good afternoon. this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov unknown drones attacked iranian military-industrial facilities, the world media express a wide variety of versions, and only the adviser to the head of the office of the president of ukraine, podolak, wrote an address to the wound. ukraine warned you the iranian foreign ministry summoned the ukrainian ambassador, your don post reports that the abrams tanks will be delivered to ukraine only at the end of 23 or at the beginning of the twenty -fourth year. i wonder how it feels schultz, who received assurances from the united states about the joint allied action , is a former foreign minister and is now a member of the european parliament.

she fatyga called for the complete destruction of russia in her opinion, it is necessary to referralization of russia creation of free and independent states in the post-russian space, in addition, she announced in brussels a forum on the decolonization and hemperization of russia surprisingly, with the loudest voice against the continuation of the war and the nuclear threat today became the voice of former us president donald trump. look at your weakness and incompetence, joe biden brought us to the brink of a third world war. we are on the brink of a third world war. if anyone does not know, becoming president, i will bring peace by force, which has never happened before. if i were president , there would not be a war between russia and ukraine even now, despite the huge loss of life and the destruction of most of the country. i would make a peace agreement

within 24 hours, right now. it could be concluded. peace agreement here interesting, at first he wrote it on twitter, we discussed it with you on friday, well, not on twitter but on our social network e, we discussed it with you on friday, as a fact, yes, but what was written turned out to be insufficiently curious another, that it sounded within the framework of e public action of the opening of the election campaign. yes, this is an event. this event was held as part of an election campaign and the consequences are interesting, because the topic is, firstly, that president biden has brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. uh, became the subject of e-selection companies inside the united states and i think trump is not merging with it. not well, absolutely rightfully, of course, but certainly for trump - this is largely work for his republican tractor, which is especially

skeptical, but with regard to biden's policy in ukraine, yes. that is, you can look at any public opinion polls, for example, for a third of e, republicans are only that is, 2/3 do not support a third support permanent unconditional support for ukraine and most republicans believe the fact that the current ukrainian conflicts, namely, even from the half-time of the united states, this conflict , its participation, it occurs aimlessly without a strategy and really threatens the whole world with a nuclear catastrophe, therefore, of course, trump as a person who is nominated for the republican primaries. you need to say what you would like to hear from him. i think that the whole world should sneeze from the big bell tower. well, uh, but the fact that this is a nuclear threat concerns the united states directly, and in the event of a showdown of nuclear relations, it is clear, that they will find out with the americans absolutely all these stories about the fact that i’m going to live in europe there and see how we respond later. well, no one believes you. yes, because

what's the point. uh, ukraine is there or europe when the main opponent is the united states and most importantly on a comparable carrier. grain weapons, that is, the force that can actually be encountered in the event of a nuclear conflict is the united states, they need to be eliminated, and not europe and ukraine, yes and despite, for example, the same thing, the analytical center rent corporation not so long ago yes, published a large risk report, this is the participation of the united states in a protracted conflict of attrition with russia yes , and the risks of a nuclear conflict are definitely the risks that, in general, the population of western countries and the united states in particular, but simply lose interest in ukraine and this very conflict, where they will become very unpopular. i think that trump is now, of course, betting on this so that in the twenty -fourth year, by the main part of the us election campaign, the relatively ukrainian agenda will be unpopular. she will pull the baytan administration to the bottom, and he can talk about what you see, i have already told everyone for a year and a half for two years

that it was necessary, yes, and to start a peaceful settlement with russia and there was no need to drag out the situation before this situations where we are losing our abrams tanks, we are lowering our weapons. in ukraine, without a goal, without a strategy, so here i think that trump hopes for it, and he strives for this, given that he really wants her to return in november 24 and even january 25 of the year. to be more precise, in the white house, yes. at the same time, uh, well, at the moment, we cannot extrapolate this into the future, but now his rating has become much better . firstly, he has risen very strongly within the republican electorate to 60 with more than a percentage, if i'm not mistaken, and he outperforms by some decent percentage, but bypasses biden in the competition, respectively, if biden is the democratic candidate. well, in general, this is what is happening, of course, you can treat trump differently, never. i don't, well, don't embellished and did not exaggerate, but i always say that he has, of course, a phenomenal instinct. so here is this question about

what will happen, well, america’s machines have already hung up, it’s interesting, by the way. we will discuss the territory of the koszulze sascha , but it was, of course, beautifully done. we go together, well, i saw with the shults that he was coming, and then suddenly it turned out that the abrams. well, in the best case, the end of this year today is january 30th. the end of the year is december. well, that is about 11 months. what will happen in 11 months find the territories where there is a military clash - god alone knows. but schultz is already supplying everything with abrams. in general, until the end of the year, but i digress further, the question arises and ukraine warms it up. thank you, by the way, for this, about uh, well, now the planes are already planes. right now, and red, who oleg told, is very interesting. they understand analysts. okay, there will be

planes. well, let's say it will drag out for some time for a month by two by three. and then what’s next, what will happen next after we deliver the planes, and ukraine they keep on losing. in general, this question alone is being discussed curiously woke up. this is indicative of pompeo. i really had a hard time understanding it. what is his position, or maybe he did not make out. but the fact that mr. pompeo vibrated, well, in the spectrum today is 180 °. well, see for yourself what he is discussing and then maybe someone can clarify to me what is really there, what needs to be done? today every day it creates huge risks. for us, for america , the risk that he uses tactical nuclear weapons, the risk that he leads to cyber company here in the us to send the signal we need to put an end to this. i know only one way to put an end to providing

ukrainians with everything they need. i am not advocating irrational checks if they are willing to defend their sovereignty and risk the lives of their boys and girls. i am ready to help them to do this against an authoritarian regime that kills civilians, then you must find a solution that has two features, firstly, it must be suitable for both the russian and the ukrainian people. everyone is talking about zelensky putin, there's just a lot going on here, so you'll have to find something that's good enough . second, we need to find a long-term solution. i live in the real world and nothing is ever permanent. well think 10-20-50 years to six months or two years. putin has not returned to this if his successor has not returned to this word. we have the opportunity to use american power, not our soldiers, sailors, pilots, power

for fast. the solution to this for a relatively long term solution is to be an american mission for the american people. well, that's somehow very contradictory, but at least what they say, uh, the ukrainian police are idiots and kill their boys and girls, in principle, i like it. well, i'm a little worried about what will happen after this, when the ukrainian boys and girls run out, what will happen after this, isn't it time for us to deal with this issue now. here is how i view it. well head of the president's office of ukraine, yermak wrote today that all long-range missile aircraft are practically in our pocket, referring to the fact that the poles support us. there are still other countries that support us, that is, go ahead, what you said, that in ukraine we think we are strategic . now, that is, they are heating up this e thing, why did i start yermak, you understand? and

the same phrase further on, literally just stupidly took the phrase and unwinds it at home. uh, one uh, telegram channel is enough, popular in ukraine i know the people who are behind this channel, and these people who are behind this channel, one to one they say the same. but these people are now in vienna, they have been cooperating for a long time, the united states of america, they even have a relationship with management. and now the office of the president, then it was the presidential administration. and i have a question. if america, on the one hand, sends a signal , you understand, that is, well, but, as it were, well, you can fight, but abrams will not be soon. abram everything will be at the end of this year or in the beginning of the next, and on the other hand, the same americans through, let's say , the ukrainian gasket, and then the voice of yermak says that, well, how are we supposed to fight, we have to go, because not only

tanks. we'll have planes, soon we 'll have long-range missiles. and this is the duality that comes from the united states of america, and she understands how to be now a ukrainian or those boys and girls who tell you pes how to understand them, so america is with us or if it is not with us, then how can we be and can we really find some kind of compromise. why the mess in my head comes from these signals, and the second thing you understand, dear leading end , you said it right, here, the month of january is over and what zelensky is talking about zelensky is talking about again, quickly, quickly, quickly. let's have a weapon. let's have a weapon. let's get weapons, because we can't keep up. here we are preparing for a counterattack or an offensive. well, without those weapons. we 're not going anywhere. and such a pause in the rhetoric in the statements of politicians leads to the fact that in ukraine, strictly speaking, there is no plan. but how can we really

act today? what to do, do you have or have you never had this familiar state. well, in order to switch off, it would be good to have the strength to be able to contrast the next one, but they are not visible, therefore , uh, that you didn’t have a plan and don’t have it, the plan is simple. pompeo said this, if you like to bury your boys and girls good children in real life with us the number of dead that we ukraine receives every day. here's what's happening on the line. you have not connected ukraine. this is with all the previous history, and not a single conclusion was made, do you understand? well, by the way, pompeo is interestingly cunning about tactical nuclear weapons. michael and why is the protector tactical , do you think that we will be

? the rhetoric is deliberately structured this way, because he still does not dare to say that, in fact, he is afraid of not tactical nuclear weapons about kiev strategic about themselves. well, what seemed to me remarkable was pompeo’s speech. well, firstly, let’s not forget the candidacy itself, that even though he is from the republican party, he is one of the representatives of the most hawkish wing of the republican party, when trump was in power, it was pompeo and bolton, but the most hostile things were announced to russia, and in general, one could expect an unambiguous position from him. just here in this here is the mainstream. i speak for staggered. yes , one could wait, but here, uh, at the same time as such classic statements that any representative of the current democratic administration could utter, all of a sudden. we heard two things. well, i noticed two things. maybe someone noticed more.

the first solution to a way out of conflicts should be suitable for the russian people, but this is what new, in general, because so far we have heard from washington that only this aggression for the free world and so on should be exclusively suitable for ukrainians, and so on, and here already some rudiments of compromise, suitable for russian people. interesting. it seemed to me that the second thing that seemed interesting immediately after that followed that no one e should expect to fulfill his maximalist dream something like this close to the text, in my opinion, i say this is also a new moment, because e the official rhetoric of the west well, almost all western countries , america is exactly what we will not negotiate behind the backs of the ukrainians, the ukrainians themselves will decide. what are their goals in the war? and what are the goals of the ukrainians, we know they are maximalists, it’s generally to take away everything, and it’s also desirable, so that the empire is only cooler than them. well, in general, well, on their level. yes, at the level of some ukrainian figures. yes, here it is,

of course. surprised being a former minister of foreign affairs at the level of the position i adhered to yes, but you still know that. here you can just ten years of experience. there, half of the russophobes have become twenty since the age of fifty, well, someone is smarter, someone is more cunning, if at the moment she decided to say it frankly, but it seems to me that this is to some extent a gift from russia propaganda, because in conversations with adequate europeans and westerners in general. you can say, well, what do you want us to exert maximum pressure on us, so that , uh, they realize their dreams, such as fatyga. in general, this rather gives us a counter argument. well, in general, everything. actually. yes, i'm the only one about adequate ones. you know, i know when i say that they are adequate there. that's when e westerners, well, this is a member of the european parliament, and the ex-minister of foreign affairs of the office of the president, but their sign is of the office of the president, but the fact is that she hangs an article she wrote in order to

announce the forum in brussels as the capital of the eu forum, in which she represents, invites representatives of twenty peoples of the russian federation who need to be released. that is, it is quite official in aiming. this is not the public history of this brussels will take place under the roof of the european parliament. as i understand it, at least, but maybe in the european commission, so about the so -called adequate comrades. west i 'll tell you when they are, when one of them will come out and say fatyga finished by a fool provocateur. and she pushes us all to a big world war, she is russophobic, when it's not you and i who say it here, but when someone comes out to the westerner and says. and where are you, how does he evaluate her. then i will say that there are adequate politicians and adequate people, and there is an adequate position, because here trump came out with a political

proclamation. notice no one else spoke. with this, you can treat trump as you like, well, the political position and declaration of the political trump has been implemented. well, by the way, you don’t know that it will somehow affect something. uh, here's the man in nato who's in charge of everything. uh, there is planning, in general, more serious than the head of the nato military committee here. he talks about it differently. what they showed us was the text of the conceptual agreement that they sent in december 2021, in it, in fact , it said that we should return to the situation before 1997. this is what they are striving for, this is their strategic goal, but you don’t believe that we are talking only about ukraine , but no, we are talking about returning to the old to the soviet union, the nato countries for decades were confident that we own the initiative.

we were the ones who decided to go to afghanistan to go to iraq these decisions came from the nato countries so we had the initiative we said when we were going with how many troops to the coconut and yes and so on. now we face the threat that is russia. she comes to us uninvited at any moment she chooses. so we have to be we don't. names to prepare, because it is up to them when they come. we are ready direct confrontation with russia we are ready, what we did after the start of the war. these are the battlegroups on the eastern flank. we have four military units in the three baltic states and in poland we have increased our presence in these battle groups. in madrid , the leaders decided to create four more battle

groups slovakia, hungary, romania and bulgaria . are we ready for a nuclear war and do you believe in such a possibility? i think it is extremely important that we all continue to believe that a nuclear war cannot be waged and will never be won. rationality concerns only this question. notice, when this question arises , rationality arises, and before that it did not arise, we owned the initiative. we pushed nato forward, the initiative was in our hands. we went to afghanistan a. then , suddenly, russia, not motivated, began to move

sideways in our history. so where is the rationality here, where is the logic here? it is not here, it appears only at the moment when the nuclear threat begins to be discussed, so there is the essence of nuclear weapons. i would said the lord is blessed. there, with a bomb, she saved humanity from many wars that would inevitably have arisen over this entire period, if there was no threat of the use of nuclear weapons, but when we talk about this or that character, and this is the admiral i don’t know, that’s what it costs, but i know well, it's fatyga. that's when we talk, she makes the first statement. so that they don’t declare now, sikorsky is active there. that hasn't been heard for a long time. now he is active, she got her out to poland, but under walesa's pre-election campaign in poland will collapse, which is for a member of the european parliament. this plays a role, but the main thing is that the polish politician is now in a big fight. at the same time here for russia on the one hand. there is no good news, because both liberals and nationalists are all

russophobes, but on the other hand. this is the swara that arises, she creates here, as here, to the maximum, she says, curious nuances. they will be visible and the contradiction with ukraine and the struggle and criticism of the current course will be unambiguous rhetoric around the military costs, but here you need to look specifically. here is the same fatyga. she was the head of the international department of solidarity. well, she was one of the leaders, 81 years old. you see, she has russopho. at the level of physiological reaction , i saw her performance - it's real. so she just hates russians, well, i don’t know how, maybe something causes an allergy in someone. this is how it is rooted there; on the other hand, there is a more global problem. there, trump said biden said we are seeing a systemic crisis of institutions back, and it would be fine it was their problem. it's our problem who to talk to. here they are so funny old or vice versa, but such a decline

in the authority of the institutions of the presidency, as in the usa or in france, uh, the chancellor in germany has not been for a long time, you know, they could criticize the president, they could discuss his dirty laundry. they could have done something else, but the institute remained the authority of this after the statement that merkel makes after biden's behavior. after from the macron, but some funny verbs appear, even as i understand it, what is possible in russian, because what are you discussing. this is an important characteristic to show johnson, because everyone has probably already discussed it somehow, this, of course, this, of course, is fiction, all british newspapers, so the headlines putin promised to kill boris is so modest. eh, headline. well, further interpretations threatened boris with murder, and so on, the yellow stripes were all the central newspapers, while they also made good circulation. eh, got good attention. uh, how the story began e johnson

announced the bbc announced the film by johnson, which is called putin vs. the west tonight they will be showing this movie. everyone is already waiting, as putin is against. west here john spoke there. he said fight. you say that ukraine will not join nato in the near future. he said so in english and not the times, the next time in your opinion is how much i answered? she will not join nato , look at the future and you are fine . you know, in fact, only desire, you know, that's how he began to threaten me at some point . uh, you know i don't want attraction this is a pain for you, but with this rocket it will take about a minute something like this he said, and i think that judging by that tone. uh, the very relaxed tone he carried and the seemingly

detached way he had, he just played along with my attempts to get him to negotiate. well just a song, of course, that's exhausting now completely headlines came out that putin threatened to kill johnson with a bit of a hefty missile. well, because the journalists asked. and peskov, this is what dmitry sergeevich johnson said. this is not true, and this is a lie, and moreover, i tell you i will say this or a conscious lie. she probably needs to ask for some purpose, did he take it, or was it not consciously and in fact, he did not understand what president putin was talking about with him then becoming a little uncomfortable back to the interlocutors of our president. i uh know what it was about. there was no conversation. speaking

about the challenges to the security of the russian federation , president putin noted that in the event of ukraine's accession, the potential deployment of nato or american missiles at our borders would mean that any missile will fly to moscow in a matter of minutes. now, if this passage was this way, you were very embarrassed, if the situation. well, embarrassing, i don't think johnson didn't understand what he was then told. i think he committed in a conscious act johnson lacks the heroism and popularity of the trip already. not just to kiev well, they don't give the required level of hype. now we need one like this. well, it's johnson. apparently, the fantasy is limited only by his hairstyle, because i didn't get around to saying that. here he threatened putin, because johnson causes hostility and involuntarily associated with the figure of boris yeltsin and even

more boris godunov, whose name is associated with the onset of unrest in russia, its weakening. that's ill knows they are worth the kingdom when the evil wandered the order. boriska only as cockerels for the greatest. and about fatygi, of course, but this is an example. well, such, indeed, nothing obscured by russophobia , right, yes, there are indeed caveman attempts. just made an impression shuddered, when i read, well, you know, huh? but uh, i read an article here, well, in translation figaro, uh, tam uh, the former head of the european bank for reconstruction, uh, and development, jacques tali , uh, so he also talks about what should happen to russia in the future. so it differs little from fatygi. well, it just might be. well, it's not all that sharp , but that's the very parallel that he draws one historical. he says he is

already in his forty-second year in the us and british. he calls the anglo-sections so, and they were already thinking about what to offer to those strange ones, who, therefore , should, uh, continue to live with them somehow. that is, uh, some kind of bright image of the future, they should have and we should draw, and russia , that is, this is a parallel, which is rest. yes , in his article he talks about what it means to deal with russia, as with the third reich. she directly says the same thing, in fact, says almost the same thing. here he talks about what is needed, well, that is , softer, only softer, some kind of bright image is needed. uh, draw the future. uh, russia about how she lost, naturally be able to fit in. here in this, uh, here in this world we need to be right away. now we have to offer. yes, it's hard to talk to them. yes, they are annoying to talk to. well, what can you do, we need to offer them some kind of future, how they can live

well with us. yes, they should be offered such a european-style renovation in their country, so that they would be delighted with this and go, you understand, therefore, they are so different. it would seem that. yes, uh, after all, there are french politicians and, uh, a commentator, and i don’t know there, yes, some kind of former functionary. and just so purebred. eh, purebred russophobe. and they say they about the same thing. well, in this sense, yes, and europe, here is a curious factor despite the fact that america is clearly the chick of this whole thing, the planner, the designer, it is clear that they are in control, because it was gorgeous, by the way, uh, what the dismissed person said, uh, the head of the biden administration, uh , ronald klein, if i remember him correctly from memory, he said the quote was gorgeous. i worked with a great man who ran

for many months a war in europe that hasn't been seen since president truman. it's almost verbatim a quote. so the head of administration is grateful to biden for being a great man who ruled the war on the european continent and a big one that hasn’t been since the time of truman. europeans. all though it though all the rest do not leave themselves such a place, although schultz tries. late already, of course, well, very curious. eh what's going on? we will now discuss with alexander viktorovich. i'll show you the schulz first. this war between russia and ukraine from providing financial humanitarian assistance to ukraine or supplying weapons, nothing changes and always did everything possible to

prevent the escalation of the war, which would lead, for example, to a war between russia and strange nato for us, this is out of the question . we will do everything possible to prevent this from happening, and we did it all the time, well, it’s clear that he answers berburg, yes and well, in this sense, close this topic, he says, we don’t have a war, e with russia, but what is everything these words? that's interesting, uh, head of foreign affairs. uh, italy also means gathering- well, he tries to keep his face upright. we are extremely concerned about everything working to achieve peace. we, as decided by the parliament , are ready to supply defensive weapons and offensive weapons to russia because

we are not at war with russia , we have nothing against the russian people. we are only defending the independence of ukraine , i wonder what all these words are worth. after all that's happened in these months. well, i can only say arches, packs and cherubs, you understand, that's why this is my life. well , as for the salt with salt, you are not far from the truth, really. it seems that something inside him trembled, either they whispered to him, or he understood, or he saw, really. here is this cunning feint with the ears, in which germany turned out to be a friend in the role of a supplier of the main supplier. e tan the americans turned out to have nothing to do with it. you know all this, these are really games that i don’t really like, because even such an ostentatious disorder of scholz does not lead me to the thought you know that this is serious a few days ago, and a representative of the left party

will, uh, commenting on the echelon with tanks that are moving there along some snow-covered road. he said, look, while we are talking, our leopards are already moving to the side, and in the direction of russia , well, they attacked him. all the newspapers described it all as fake. that's where they move in that place. uh, there's snow everywhere. and we don't have snow. everything is warm here, one small little newspaper called merkelmanin is a newspaper that is published in land, brandenburg, which i remind you, is just adjacent to poland. that is, this is the borderland, she wrote that we decided to carry out our fact, check-tyk. we really checked everything. decided to find this place. this place is called eastern brandenburg in those days when this representative of the bundestag referred to, there really was snow, and it was terrible. indeed, several trains with leopard tanks were passing there, heading towards russia, we asked a question. they write it.

they asked us a question. ah, they described it to the bundeswehr all this was shown. answer us these questions got the answer. no, no tanks go to ukraine, but they go to latvia because we have an agreement with this country, what we are doing there, a certain exchange group leaves from there, another one comes in their place, therefore, this echelon is really in passed these days. there he moved to the east, but he did not move as you would think to ukraine, he moved to latvia, but the truth is one question. they didn't answer if you watch this video. well, there are probably 30 of these tanks. what 30 tanks, they are going to change in latvia, as far as i know, there were two battalions, two companies, but i probably don’t know there, well, 15 tanks can be more nato, a company is 14. well, i’m sorry, i don’t know, i don't know, you see, i'm not an expert.

i just read, well, well, well, let's say this is so, but i doubt very much that even if there is an exchange of a change of composition, that they are removing tanks, or rather, they are removing some tank ones, and others are brought in their place, although such germans. maybe the crew should move along with the tank. well, they moved closer. that's where they are now. well , as i understand it, there is a very short distance from latvia to ukraine. you understand what to do here important you look and you are looking for material things. yes confirmation. but enough, uh, they are already in rhetoric. here, as far as i understand, this is the main editor. e. drill, uh, they asked him, jacques schuster they asked him, he answered. it seemed to me. it's very like that. well, again, in my rubric and in my core. uh, new sincerity, very sincere replied. improving the back line the war began. we saw some red

lines and it was said again and again that first germany would not supply armored personnel carriers, and then main battle tanks, how red. you are really reading this line for germany, what i really think, in principle in a war of character that is constantly changing , there can be no red lines. in the sense that there are almost no red lines that can be relevant forever, we have to wait for the development of events now, i would say, perhaps even earlier it should have been said that the red the lines, if drawn at all, will be answered by the strongest man in this alliance, the president of the united states, and the germans will respond if necessary. i think that this is news, firstly , you understand, there is such a principle that the red lines have the utmost flexibility , then all those who are worried are right, but already three or two or three red lines have already crossed, it is obvious that further e by planes

solve nothing. and then it will be necessary to swear that the start of nato hostilities against russia is aside, and right here understand that a situation will arise. ukraine will not win on its own. well, a million boys and girls will die after that ukraine, when a million dies ukraine is deserted in the military sense and supplies will be destroyed further, what should nato join next, the poles themselves will not climb. it is necessary to fight directly from russia without a roof; the poles will not climb along with everyone else , joining nato, this is a direct point of our doctrine about the threat to the existence of our state, nuclear doctrines. here, if necessary, enters completely into the war. our doctrine appears foundation. yes, here, in fact, the whole story, well, the second one

is interesting, he understands this. he says, well, if the president of the united states orders. let's go well, how else without an order anywhere, especially for the germans. you understand the order. yes, maxim, i'm talking about jones on your permission, but such an interesting story. this is a different interpretation of what putin said or allegedly said to him, but it seems to me that we need to take advantage of this situation, because dmitry peskov sounded very convincing, and in general, there is no reason to suspect that he cunning when he says that he knows the content of the conversation. and what putin actually said. it seems to me that this is the case when it would be possible to make an exception to the generally accepted diplomatic rules and publish that fragment of the transcript of the conversation of the then prime minister of great britain with the president of the russian federation where it would be clear what putin actually said well , and, accordingly, it is better to do it quickly, until they come out. eh, everyone there, in my opinion, three episodes will be from this film, so that people already

know what really happened there, what in fact putin said, in a similar manner to other statements the statement was made with johnson from agreed. yes, i'm not sure that we should cross the same line, this macron is doing this a lot of people who have done it. ah, publications. well, i'm not sure, i don't deserve storm johnson for us to break the rules we think are right. yes, there are two components of ukraine e. maybe she can win on her own. can she fight on her own or not? let's take a look at the first here is the official publication about what life in ukraine presents itself to budgetary life in january 2023. here ends. january. yes, 4 billion 20035 million dollars ukraine received this month, three of them with something. this is the european union sandalwood and 1 billion united states of america part of a small issued ggs. that's all the money that comes to ukraine, that is, more than

80% of ukraine lives in the economy of ukraine - this is other people's money, other people's money. now let's look at the military components of what they say, i apologize . well, in ukraine there is a lot of criticism and every day it is said more, people are experts, even some politicians will not let anyone try to deceive us. we have no weapons. they are trying to push us to the slaughter in the month of february in the offensive, but no one gives us weapons, and in this regard, well, it was such a remarkable one. uh, the secretary with the nbo at the beginning of the condensation. uh, zelensky danilyuk, he now works in britain. well, he also occupies there, and he says, publicly respected ukrainians or not. dear nobody, you can’t put anything in february in march, but consider this before advance. that's what the picture is now in ukraine where? and very interesting information, the new york times, if i'm not mistaken, the kid probably knows better, uh, published in such

interesting information that the intelligence community of the united states of america puts, uh, this drone attack on an iranian facility and for a massage. that's it in my opinion. this is very curious. story. it is clear that it is also used there, including in the internal political struggle, because ron desantis is known as such an ardent hawk, uh, in relation to iran? here they explain it this is what happened with iran and that israel wants to get out of the criticism. oh yes , the united states of america for a neutral position on ukrainian. uh, this, uh, means, uh, the ukrainian crisis, and so on. but the fact that this is how the american press. in this case, there is a drain that puts forward, israel in my opinion. it's very curious. alexander is now all over europe, i don't know how it is in america, well, in europe. wheels from the former so -called opposition circles who are recruiting against russia and for ukraine here in

leonid gosman visited berlin a few days ago. i don't know, are you such a politician or not? i don’t remember him, but i visited there and he visited the jewish community , and uh, there was his big speech, i won’t tell, but in the end the performance came there, there was a hall of 200 people , 200 people came. he says, we announced a fundraiser with the help of ukraine, as a result, we collected 587 euros. well, in terms of, that is , each presence gave the gosnun 2 euros 90 cents for the needs of ukraine, this is not because people are stingy, but simply because stories about the fact that everyone in the west and everyone there in germany and in berlin and in the same jewish community is just so ready to lay out money to help, nothing like this disperses a purely propaganda wave for us. what they would like to see, well, guzman was smart enough, to be honest, how much he collected. at least he was honest about it. how many others are there? they say we collected a million and a half million there. i think everything rests on the

same 2.90 as the gosman 2.90. yes, but it reminds on the one hand, of course. ostap bender on the other hand. that's about the community. that was holocaust remembrance day indeed. well, one that has historical significance, because, well, this is an exceptional event in the history of mankind of destruction, so when on precisely the day of remembrance of the holocaust in the german bundestag , the holocaust is relegated to the background and all this horror is relegated to the background, and in the foreground , it turns out, the main thing is why they gathered to remember those uh hmm who belong to this very lgbt and how hitler tortured them against the backdrop of six million, uh, dead burnt exterminated jews. it’s interesting, uh, somehow public organizations will react to the fact that they are put in one row,

otherwise they are here about the fact that our minister said that the russian question is a historical analogy, well, with the jewish question, and before that, it remains a little bit. by the way, if you listen to a fatygu, and everyone else, then it turns out that way, yes, it causes. e, so to speak, e protest that you can not put in one row. but this is what was put in the bundestag. it turns out you can win already appeared reaction in all the media, when they write about this meeting the same one goes the same paragraph almost in memory, but those who died in the holocaust sinte and roma and e, representatives of a non-traditional minority. that is, it is now obligatory for mention on lacus victims remembrance day. now we need to mention the whole line. i do not rule out that someone else will appear later. any additional, well, bon voyage, what is called bon voyage advertising after it continue? but for now, goodbye everyone.

sklifosovsky anniversary season today at 21:20 finalists of four years in the battle of the seasons all together. who will be the best of the best at 21:30. inspired by sports, pick up on wildberries a universal image for walking, training and outdoor activities from adidas. we take cherkizovo. you take good care of your health. that's how vitamin d is the latest generation of strength, supporting the nervous system, immunity, muscles and bones

in the winter. you can not wait for the courier, but order on apteka.ru 10% discount on the first order moscow coffee house on a share taste of pleasure i love recommend they took a loan from sovcombank up to 5 million. and now you use the color of the wallpaper in children's loans from sovcombank to the branch and corners conceived done coupon 5.05.0 2 twisters for the price of one on wednesday at kfc when did you already achieve a lot? do not stop 30 years megafon is just the beginning. thank you for being with us why united electronic audiobooks

in one place to listen when it is inconvenient to read the choice is always yours to each other to read when it is inconvenient to listen. when we got married, my husband set conditions only turkey. it is not greasy, hypoallergenic muscle mass is useful for children. what can be cooked from a turkey is all indian, dad from an ecologically clean region of russia from his pavel you can cook any dish that will always be both tasty and healthy.

never use and never will use hormones. and what is your name? god, i recognize that look. anton, you're in love with you drawn for simpletons to rewrite life, choose

brighter colors. you are a beautiful young woman. by the way, i intend to fuck with you today anastasia vedenskaya is divorced, i would keep my mind on him pyotr barancheev. nick you alla yuganova. sergei makovetsky excuse me comrade the partisans wanted to talk to you. i am a ruve yankee watchman and a synagogue chaz. that is, a singer. can we stay with you, we have nowhere to go, we cannot return home, they will kill us there. no, you can’t,

right on january 30, the director would have turned exactly 100 years old, leonid gaida, the actors instantly became stars. little is known, we found grown-up guys and will tell for the first time. who grew up little heroes of films on channel russia this is the program, who is against on channel russia 1, we continue our discussion. here is one line of the us election campaign. yes, we discussed it on trump, but there is a second one, it is very relevant now, it is seething. by the way, i don't know how they'll find it there. uh, way out, while they pushed the border for themselves until mid-summer, meaning breaking through

the ceiling of the state long. yes, but in terms of rhetoric and the heat that stands in the confrontation between republicans and democrats. basically, this is a new level before so seriously they didn't discuss it. look here, uh, senator cruz detailing what we were here 15 years ago to tell. we are faced with a debt crisis runaway inflation in the economy caused by uncontrolled spending, but to appreciate the significance. let me add a few more statistics to the ones we have for the year 2000, which doesn't seem to be that far off. you know that the national debt was five trillion in 2000 five. so what happened since 2000 , george w. bush came to power republican?

and in the 8 years of bush's presidency, the debt to win trillions of dollars increased to ten trillion dollars. thus, we doubled the national debt, 42 the second president accumulated a debt of five trillion dollars and 43 and doubled it to 10 trillion dollars. the eighth year barack obama comes to power the national debt forces $10 trillion 8 years later public debt. doubled again to $23 million. thus, in 16 years, two presidents, one republican, another democrat, increased the debt by 4 times in five to 23 million dollars. $31 trillion. that 's reckless. if you look at the rise and fall of great nations, you look at the roman republic, the roman empire, which bankrupted itself by inflating the currency. you look at our maritime republic people

buying a loaf of bread in a wheelbarrow full of cash the washington democrats are trying to steer us down that path. and you are absolutely right. listen in the new republican majority house of representatives, we need to use the blue to stop this uncontrolled spending and debt that lead to inflation. it is now necessary to damage the americans, throughout our country. here are the americans. here, uh, the malek will tell his point of view in my memory, so that a high-ranking person with a history of circumference is definitely a senator with a history and a soritet, so that everything is described in such detail in my memory. this is the first time. well, you can say the speaker is positive at first. uh, two spans of 8 years, the debt doubled. and now everything has grown by one and a half times in six, the dynamics is positive, as some sales director will say, you can give an award. as a matter of fact, sir. but seriously, i’ve already stopped looking at direct

official statistics lately, because it stops, just like the exchange trading mechanism , pricing stops working out, i’ll look for some indirect ones. here is the european well closely related. naturally , with the staff at the statistics agency, they noted with a handful what proud people they are. they have reduced consumption so far. approximately 20-25% energy consumption, but they say modestly. well, perhaps this is because we have disciplined people and a warm winter, guys, not a single warm winter without a drop in industrial production will reduce such an economy. saving electricity. this means that the iron industry is worth it, but the indians have long been known to have long since left there. nuria didn't even leave. they suspended the production of furnaces are warmed up to work in idle non-ferrous metallurgy. yes, a lot of what is most important is the structural industry. here in the same 3-4 months, when they will discuss again, return to the issue. sudefault in europe this will already affect

the product lines directly. and just look at, uh, what can be the increase in production. what even with a drop of 20-25% in energy consumption? this is impossible. it's impossible, not with the help of any economy. even if they washed, only there their paws at four points, i don’t know for 4 seconds each, this is impossible. this is industry. if you say a very important thing, it will be interesting to look at the statistics. yes, because maybe, maybe we will become witnesses with you, a miracle that has never happened, that is, a 25% drop in electricity consumption and the presence of economic growth is easy. here is such a miracle. yes, i literally became it for you in one minute. from the same series, i’m a bit like trump thought, or rather, trump counted a dollar for 200 rubles. it was therefore considered so exactly so. can you count the problems here? no, you know, dima, but

i never cease to admire the americans, who are actually bankrupt. yes, they rule the whole world and feel normal for some reason about the roman empire the republic told you well too. i feel you know, i remember relatively speaking, 100 dollars in the nineties and 100 dollars. today it is, in my opinion, very different 100 dollars, you understand, if not one in ten there, well, ten will not fail. yeah, well, i just, i just understand that these are different units of measurement, in general, what you can buy according to the sensations. show 100 dollars in the nineties. i don't think you can buy it even for a thousand dollars now. now about now about the inflation tank there is inflation, what to do now about this you know, the americans have one principle that they don’t, in fact, they spend in ukraine, they said, you guys fry, and the fish will be, you fry the fish, you just won’t get it, right? well, they are discussing abrams. they

're now saying, well, we'll put them there, er, early next year, but history is history. not about it. this is not a story about tanks. this is a story about money. this is a story about the ipc and they want the americans , they cleared the topic of tank deliveries, but they themselves are in no hurry to deliver them so that the germans delivered their tanks and tell me, please, whose tanks will burn in ukraine and whose tanks will the burning tanks be on the front pages of newspapers, american or german, of course german, and then the question will become, but i wonder whose tanks will then be bought by the countries of the european union, when they burn german tanks, probably american ones. well, it's all a story about money, you know, not a sermon. not about territorial integrity. and by the way, i'm here with all this, the americans will not remove the issue in the near future. uh the offensive of ukraine will not be filmed. why,

regardless of readiness. how many leopards will come does not interest them. it doesn’t interest how many ukrainians die there, but if, nevertheless, biden’s visit to europe takes place in february, they will definitely force ukraine to launch a counteroffensive or call it on the offensive, whatever you want, in any case and in any outcome. they will make them do it more already said that, uh, he would love to, but he will not go to ukraine to ukraine no, he will go to europe last year. and in general. i don't think it will make it this year. well, to be honest, all this is more connected here, not even with his visit, which will be, if i’m not mistaken , the third, but first of the twenty-second year in europe, i mean, yes, and at first there was an election campaign, which just starts in the middle around february. he would really like to show that but you see. how i successfully defend democracy in ukraine in quotation marks a. now i will also successfully defend the democracy inside the united states is no longer from russians, but there are trumpists and so on people who took the capitol by storm. so on this i will just

try to start that same election campaign for the twenty-fourth year. here's the thing about ted cruz's speech. it's all, of course, quite funny sounds this man who began his election campaign, and with an election career in the bush jr. administration and was just the head of the federal trade commission in the system there. even then, he somehow did not resent the growth of the state debt. well, now he's angry. they all such. it's interesting there. uh, democrats, republicans, democrats, republicans do one another, and that is, of course, so absolutely, and, of course, to bear on the growth of public debt. it is colossal and everything would be fine and wonderful. yes, if, for example, the rates in the united states were zero and the payments on the public debt would be small, but now the rates have risen, of course, to service such a public debt, the most expected this year is 1.2 or 1.5 trillion dollars will have to be spent only on one hundred percent of this public debt and of course , republicans, which is now shaky, but most of the representatives' habits will be pressed to the white house in every possible way in order to reduce spending on areas that are not the most priority in their opinion. and this may also be

ukraine, so here, too, time is working against the biden administration. i agree that they, of course, would like to show some kind of success on the ukrainian front. for these six months, because then there are already many uncertain moments. will it be possible to agree on the same further support for ukraine for 20, finally, 23 years, twenty-fourth - this is a question, perhaps it will not be possible, will it be possible to win military attrition? well, most likely not, so now, of course, they will try in every possible way to incite the ukrainians to their offensive. i hope to turn the tide at the front and then force russia to agree to its demands, if this does not work out, the situation for the biden administration is sharply complicated today by another important event. e happens we haven't discussed it yet. a visit to moscow by pakistan's foreign ministers is not easy. what foreign affairs, but still the head of one of the parties that are part of the ruling coalition, and pakistan is the most important country in asia in general, the fifth most populous nuclear power in the world and it is very important for moscow to diversify

oil supplies to asia because for now we are too dependent on two and partners china india it would be very good to have a third partner. pakistan is about this will be discussed. as one could understand the statement of the pakistani officials, so it does not see, including the oil ministers, the plans, but grandiose. i would say oil minister they expect that deliveries will go drop by drop, and in serious volumes. not just one or two parties. oh, and up to thirty-five percent of pakistani oil will come from russia, but that would be a good story. why didn't they try to negotiate? before that, there was a visit back in november, but yes, ours did not agree to the same significant discount as for india 30-40% according to the pakistanis, they demanded, moscow did not agree. well, let's see what will happen now , uh, i think tonight, in the evening

, the results of the press conference of the minister will be known foreign affairs of pakistani and our minister lavrov well, and then quite quickly events should develop if we reach these agreements. this can be a serious help for the russian budget of ukraine, the inspector arrived in ukraine and not one inspector, but as many as three such three-headed snakes are representatives of the pentagonal, and the administration is representatives of the very structure that finances in social isolation and all these yes, and and these three representatives were photographed, naturally. eh, intro. hello hello greeted quietly. went to work and the first thing they did. they uh, published the site did said. dear ukrainians or in general who? maybe knock? whoever knows about some money, about some schemes, and then and so on, inform us. well, we've come to really clean up the mess. i jumped out of this situation. i think it's

the same what misfortune fell on the ukrainians. now you know, now the real political life of the national cause will begin in our country. yes, and to be brief, dmitry, for the second week in ukraine, events are shaking, we the officer is fired. we dismiss the heads of the ministry of departments. today they announced another 10 dismissals, including vice-premiers. they even want to fire gerashchenko, you understand, that is, i’m shot, i just, i just don’t understand how connected these two events are. yes, if the auditors and this is storm, uh, inside ukrainian politics. i can answer you. e , depending on the exodus, if the amount of corruption is at least 20 percent and the stolen will be published by the auditors. then i can tell you that then the eyes will open and it will become. it's clear, how monstrously the ukrainians deceived the holy americans, how insulting and hard it is for the americans

to be offended in their best feelings when the partner whom they respected so much and who was not so cared for. so cruelly deceived them, stole so much money and therefore lost the war with russia over pakistan if it is possible to really agree on oil with pakistan, but these are not revolutionary changes in essence. you slombade karacha would have a saying here that three of pakistan are ruled, and this is the army of allah and america and uh, the second important point about the long us and started to take on the campaign very big concern is that the americans have bet on a global escalation what we see in iran is an attempt to draw in latin america continues to pull, despite the change in leadership in the house of representatives by the mustache, china that's a big one. because the debt clock is ticking. eh, very short. not so long ago, a serious reduction in bonuses was announced even for india very briefly. indeed, as far as pakistan is concerned, uh, still, i'll correct my colleague,

the situation is more complicated there. there are still very strong positions of the people's republic of china at the present time and accordingly, uh, most likely, the deal will be connected with iranian mixtures of russian oil. here, you know, i want to tell you , in the fight against corruption here, to the americans, the main thing is not to turn on themselves, because i think that they just knew everything very well, who, where, why and how. i think there is a purge of politicians. they are corrupt. they just need to clean and form there such a political field, which, without any resistance, without any there. e, i solved all the questions that the americans will not have. i think that the issue of rationing theft is also worth it. there is also the issue of rationing theft. well, somehow you still need to keep yourself within the framework. here. uh, i think the americans are a little annoyed by this. by the way, i don’t see the slightest potential in all these people to blather against america

, so i don’t see it, well, let's see, let's look at today, i have everything right now, look wist program and see you tomorrow. the information service of the russia tv channel continues its work on the air, you watch together. my name is maria sittel hello fire support jet art batteries are moving deeper. for more than an hour now, we have been driving along such a continuous impassability, assault groups are already on the perimeter.