they guaranteed, of course, that everyone must gather with them, and everyone must guarantee the peace of poland. but she must not do anything else. this is the most important thing later, he is actively provoking germany , that is, boorish statements, while the company in poland is obligatory about the fact that our country will never be occupied by any aggression, and in general this is not an aggressor. and we will be the first to enter berlin, and they really count. in march 1939, hitler tore up the fact, not the attack from poland fits of rage the fuhrer, exclaimed the poles miserable incapable of anything boastful gang. it's also good. known to the british, as well as to us. yes, it is not heard that chekhov and polyakov present to us this rabble who is no better than the sudanese and indians as sovereign states. a month later, hitler approved

a plan for an attack on poland, code -named weiss, being on the verge of death, more immediately went over to the opposite camp and entered into negotiations with england and france, it seemed. now nothing can stop the creation united anti-hitler coalition. in the summer of 1939, english and french diplomats arrived in moscow. the main topic of the negotiations was the question of how the soviet troops would approach the border with germany in the event of a war. in the event of a war, our delegation demanded from the british french negotiators that they give firm commitments on behalf of more that the soviet the troops will be let through the polish territory and england, france turned to the dekuchu that, of course, poland

should let the troops through, answered arrogantly, that there are no such circumstances that foreign troops did not let through the territory of poland , the soviet boots the polish land. probably, but they were counting on something that they would not be attacked last, or that they would be protected by england from france , but they themselves had just seen how england and france act when it is not beneficial for them. what is mulcher collusion. this is one of the most shameful pages of world diplomacy, the most vile treaty. yes, they give to be eaten, like a piece of meat, czechoslovakia does not even ask her if she wants it or not. is it really poland did not have a feeling that the next one will be? by mid-august 1939, the negotiations reached an impasse, the head of the french military mission in moscow, general duet, reported to paris without a doubt that the ussr wanted

to conclude a military fact and did not want us to turn this fact into an empty piece of paper, the failure of negotiations is inevitable if poland does not will change its position, however, the polish authorities did not intend to change their position. commander-in-chief of the polish army, marshal ryts migly, said there is no guarantee that the advice is really will take an active part in the war, in addition, once they enter the territory of poland , they will never leave, its marshal was echoed by the minister of running, who speaks with the germans, we risk losing our freedom, and with the russians , our soul. on august 23, 1939, the soviet union signed a non-aggression pact with nazi germany, which went down in history as the molotov-ribbentrop pack. poland

showed self-confidence, self-confidence, because first of all relied on the power of great britain, france, that she would throw germany with all her power and protect more. they they relied very much on their own, they believed that they did not win, and finally. here the polish spirit will not save it. they believed that they would win on their own in a clash with germany on september 1, 1939, germany attacked poland in response to this, france and great britain declared war on berlin but did not take any effective measures in order to help their new ally. the polish army was defeated. after 2 weeks , the polish government fled to romania at

dawn on september 17 , soviet troops entered the territory of western ukraine and western belarus. troops. at the end of september 1939, the second speech, the commonwealth ceased to exist. fate was no longer very unenviable, poland paid for it. let's apply this term to the hamburg account. she paid, that is, in full , honestly, on a well-deserved hamburg bill. that is, here's what you deserve and you will get more than 6 million dead concentration camps continuous on the territory of poland politics and the solution of the final polish question. that is, the poles, as a nation, in principle, should have disappeared. from the map of europe here. what is there was fate and what was the price for the fact that you and this monster and predator decided to play

some allied games. here he is, how do you feel about it, and what did he want to do with you? and what he almost did to you, so here everyone must draw a historical conclusion for himself . wounded and devastated poland was finally liberated by soviet troops at the beginning of 1945. the decision to recreate the polish republic and establish its post-war borders was made at the yalta conference at the insistence of stalin on the territory western ukraine and belarus were left as part of the soviet union in exchange for poland received part of the historical german lands in the west in the battles for the liberation of poland, more than half a million soldiers and officers of the red army died. in 2017, the polish authorities adopted a law banning communist propaganda. according to this document, all

monuments to the soviet soldiers-liberators on the territory of poland must be demolished. well, yes, but a couple of words on military topics once the conversation turned, all this, what was said here,

of course, is correct on the one hand, as it were, yes, but on the other hand, my deep conviction is the action in linear logic. we will not be successful, of course, these talks about the fact that let's mobilize another million, and then another million we will dig up trenches everywhere, so to speak, let's put, so to speak, dugouts of three logs. this is a voluntary retreat to the middle of the 20th century, a voluntary retreat into the seriousness of the 20th century. yes, if we do not demonstrate, the real superiority is not in the number of people, but in striking power. yes, if we do not demonstrate the ability to paradox, and does not roll on the corridor to which they attacked us, in which they rolled up the determination to be used. yes , including determination, we will have a lot of problems, a lot of problems, because this is exactly what is possible. let's knock out another million, another million, dig your trenches there with shovels, so to speak. yes, build, damn it, even, and we have a grouping here. she has no right to fight on our territory, you will divide it on your own or on ukrainian, and we must be safe

, do not touch us, and we constantly confirm this every time when another circus with european politicians comes there, and we do not touch them. we don't touch them. here they have already shown the eu summit, no longer will ramstein move to kiev and we will all play in some incomprehensible nobility. yes? well , of course, these are not nato citizens, as it were, yes, we have no right to touch them. they are official politicians, then after some time we find out that someone also said something like that to someone. it seems to me that actually here, if we are to evaluate a serious situation, yes, then this should be done. well, how about sober look. this is linear logic. and this is an attempt to roll back our country to the middle of the 20th century. and here, so to speak, no matter how much you mobilize, yes, they will find something to answer. if they are invulnerable, i will find something to answer. don't worry, so to speak, yes there are those who want to say so, and the country and so on and so forth to form a group. and now we will talk. now, if belarus is attacked in white, then we

are, yes, if they go to the kursk region, wow. here in ukraine it is also possible what they need is obvious, how to say yes, unless there is a completely obvious superiority, uh, prearranged over that for that logic that they impose on us. yes , i think it can stretch like this. well , this is an unmeasured perfect number of years and not in our favor, but i could be wrong. it would be better if i was wrong, of course, yes, but nonetheless. here 's something for me to say, e suggests yes offers. i propose, for example, now armenia i, for example, propose to do something so that our aviation strategic madonna wear massive strikes, they sit on the airfield and talk about the fact that they have the same air defense if we cannot cope with the air defense of ukraine tell me, please, which one, in my opinion, can we cope with? what country’s air defense can we deal with, and then why all these planes , why all these airfields, so to speak, this is all for which it has been built over the years, and so on and so forth. it's the same question. i think he has a right to exist. i want yes, so

to speak, that missile technology that we are talking about, so that it carries such blows so that no one would get hurt from it, as it were, yes boring. i want all sorts of europeans , as it were, for a century, to forget how to cross the border of ukraine and would call their own, so to speak, this dick zelensky there to my place in poland, i want this. because that way the war will end faster. and if this does not happen, it will be longer and more people will be needed, so to speak, and even more resources , and so on and so forth. how well you look. they agreed to fight, as they fought there in 41-45. this is how they agreed to fight. this is what they what they need is what they need, and not what we need, again, i can be mistaken, but it seems to me that we can’t do that before, that is garbage, but i think so in my opinion. that's just the way it is , it suits them. that's at the beginning of all these all these situations, when they became very scared. then yes, not because they didn’t know how we would act, but then we made it clear that we mean some rules of the game

that we follow this ex. uh, prime minister of israel because on the one hand what he said about that negotiations with ukraine stopped the west in the first place, so to speak, yes, but the americans and everyone else, and this confirms ours , so to speak, well, the reasoning that ukraine is nothing more than a consumable, because in fact. understand, yes, there was an opportunity to agree on something, there was an opportunity to stop the bloodshed, but the west did not let you do it, making a choice in favor of what in favor of the fact that since there is such a stupid side as ukraine with such a stupid people, then it must be spent it must be spent, as it were, but at the same time, as it were, yes, it puts pressure on russia and there, uh, things will go further, but uh, this is also, as it were, an obvious thing. and by the way, saying hmm that's also a big question. by the way, i know that our ukrainian colleagues. everything is there, everything is there , while this very thing predicts some sort of rebellion in ukraine. i still don’t see any rebellion there, yes, like heifers on a string, as if they go where they were told, as if, yes, they are twisted, they are silent, as if silent, silent, silent, how much more must be lost,

then, for them to say something, and did something like that? oh well, and the second is that something like this is a boiler, this is the exterior minister, israel said that putin promised not to kill zelensky. maybe this is true? maybe it's true, i don't know how, yes, it's not confirmed. not to say so, it is not refuted, but it is clear that the case was on march 5 and on march 5 there was another situation, but on the whole in my opinion. yes? or you don’t need to start, you don’t need to beat so that you don’t get up. or it was not necessary to start a war, this is a matter in which to exclude no course of events can be ruled out, but it seems to me that none of our enemies can correctly assess this generosity. he says that on the same day, zelensky jumped out like hell and said that he was fearless, that he was fearless. although, it seems to me, in any war. well, let's say neutralization. uh, the tops of the state and the question of the capital, as if this is a priority strategic goal. no, the tops the war is going differently the war is going differently. again , so to speak, i do not pretend to this knowledge, but i

you just read historical books, it says something like that, and this is so and this is so. why, as it were, yes, everyone is trying, it means to eliminate or neutralize. at least the top of pretty much the state or let's say. uh, means to make a question deal with the question of the capital. why, because everyone knows perfectly well that this radically changes the course of the war. and when do you inform these people that they are not personally in danger? well, what to be afraid of in general, then, look, they personally are not in danger of anything, european politicians nothing threatens, nothing threatens the americans. in europe, nothing threatens the states. nothing threatens, what they are afraid of then, if there is ukraine with their ukrainians and russia with russians, but even if they beat each other, it means, as much as you like, that here, as it were, what kind of america i discovered. it seems to me that this is an obvious thing. yes, it seems to me that this is written in black and white, so the task. what is the task to get out of this logic, which is beneficial to them? in what ways we have a mass of people with big stars, so to speak, and powerful

powers of the ways, apparently, should be or if they are not there, they must be found. it seems to me that this is extremely important, because this logic is linear, as it were, yes. she. well, let's say, so i've said it here many times, you'll say it. i hope that no one has this doubt, i am absolutely sure of the historical victory of russia in the rightness of our cause. i'm sure that god is with us, but with all this, you know god helps those who do something themselves, yes, trust god and the most, and don't make a mistake yourself. so with everything you will come, with all these things, as it were, yes, you don’t have to be fools and you don’t need to play other people's games over impose your own rules as much as possible, naturally. clearly, there is a natural limitation. but i think it's extremely important. this is extremely important. yes? here, in fact, about such thoughts i feel contagiously wanted the general. well, you probably don't mind. or maybe clarify well, about the stupid ukrainian people. i think on the other side of us any people will be stupid, except for the population of the united states of america , it's just that it will be consistently

declared stupidity one way or another. and there is no need to write illusions about drawing masters, including strategic aviation strategic aviation, actually. here is designed for rocket 55 cores gear. so i want to remind you that this is the main weapon that carries and targets for strategic aviation is located behind a large puddle of north america. this is the main one where it should be directed. now, with regard to conventional weapons, i completely agree that the guys are walking around too freely, including in kiev, but nonetheless. let's see if we can, depending on ukraine, i will i assure you, we can and we can and in fact. here's what they showed you today. how much his air defense system has been destroyed also speaks of this, and this task is not only the example of aviation, but the task of everyone, starting with our special-purpose artillery groups,

aviation missile forces, was confirmed by bomb rockets in conventional equipment. well, and so on and so forth, plus, of course, the reconnaissance means that these goals should give out to do it all at once throughout the territory of ukraine. well, it’s probably difficult. but to isolate separate areas. and it is quite possible to simply clean them. perhaps that interferes. what is it that is interfering? yes, in fact, with conventional weapons. and it interferes with the fact that today the plant only reaches the serial production level for the needs of exactly the group that exists. that is, you understand perfectly well that in any war, no matter what it is, there is a system for delivering single massive strikes against water, there group massed of any kind , there will still be losses in the war, in general there mathematics is clear mathematics. this mathematics and no more than where it is clearly

considered how much the loss of the enemy. how many losses of our own and how much our industry is the ability of industry to compensate for these losses so that the combat potential of those troops that are not reduced, i assume that today, when we talk about the fact that finally march, the industry should be exactly on that pipe, when we are 100% provided by our born forces, then i think, probably this is a process to apologize a little, at least for a month or two, while that we are advancing today and our main groupings that are moving forward are provided for, than to carry out this offensive now is the second question. if we take the common potential of nato and the russian federation, it will take about 3.5-4 years. so like this, like this, for all types of aircraft, and off we go. including a serious advantage in cruise missiles, like that, he also argued and talked with me. this

potential is not yet in ukraine, because yesterday i talked with our guys there, they didn’t ask me to say hello, also those handsome when the eighties clapped, all his gum, says hello. pass so unobtrusive. well, i say, well, this is separate. go. now let's talk straight. that's what it is, yes, in order to completely isolate ukraine, as the system happens, the elementary series does not need a lot of them, they are limited. somewhere around 40 to 60 km, nuclear explosions in the air, the entire air defense system was covered as a result. she'll just burn out. it will be a priori not economic workers tell, but what it is can't do it guys. we understand that we simply have a ratio of conventional weapons that we do not use from ours. well, you understand that in matters i am talking about, these are weapons, especially tactical operational tactical. yes, we have a clear

advantage. this is our advantage. why do the americans say that they will defend south korea with conventional and nuclear weapons at once, and, yes, they cut off the topic. come on, we, too, in this case, let's say, guys, the first leopard forest that appears will get hit in the head with a vigorous bomb. that's all. at least let's say. no, well, at least say we will produce, and when i even speak here among our colleagues, well, not here with your colleagues. and when they say it's nuclear armageddon they say, okay? well, you break me down. what is tactical ammunition, i don’t know operationally tactical. and what is a nuclear airborne space underwater explosion not to know. what are you talking about here, then you are standing if you are not an expert in this matter. i do not climb, where i do not understand anything. and in this matter, this is an interesting logic, because what if well, i'm kind of educated, you know , such nuclear decay is probably worse, but nevertheless, nuclear weapons. you understand how it works perfectly, what is nuclear

armageddon you don't have to be a military man to understand what a nuclear exchange is. it doesn’t matter strategically what kind of landmine happens? wait a minute. i’ll agree to the end, you now talk about the forces of strategic deterrence, which we insist on, yes, the use of nuclear weapons, 152 ammunition, etc. 24 km, roughly solid gold lived for how long yes, what's the difference the big difference is huge, because the strategy they stand in place. they look there, and we are working here on earth and it will turn out quite normally, and the radius of damage is the radius, that is, from a point of 1.5 km. here the case is not at all joy in this case. wrong. what well, if they have already delivered leopard tanks, after that they will supply tactical nuclear weapons to ukraine so, is it necessary to warn this so that there is nothing to be imported to ukraine? well, here i am telling alexandrovich about it. so you explain again. it is at the moment impossible to do. i even that's all. well

we have funds one one chinese balloon. taught all american politics for a week off perfectly. let's why because you think standard? let's launch three more, it's in the way. this, by the way, is a good idea, it's interesting. it is important. seriously. see. if e germany by the way, they will put it that way. i don't think nuclear weapons will be delivered either. well, yes, a java-bearer. we are locked in this logic , this is it, but if we start dictating it and do it first, of course, but try to drive it. they understand that we are already beating strategists here, of course, this is already such an escalation that wants to take risks, like do you still have business here on earth? uh, i'm sorry. yes, i say, this is the most important remark. i just don’t know, maybe now it’s not like that, but let’s say 2 weeks ago it was still like that, and in terms of monetary pleasure , i just also met with the guys, as if on the ground and all that, there is a problem when monetary

allowance is mobilized, but seriously higher monetary pleasure. uh, contractors on the same, so to speak, e in the same position at the same rank, this creates an unnecessary disproportion, so to speak, yes, some, if they weren’t a psychological problem, as it were, and potentially creates russian just that’s all. this queen is extremely important to call them. so to speak, in these most by lifting. naturally, i do not understand monetary pleasure. the goals require that for contractors, every day in the service is considered as finding duct tape, because, well, there is such a problem. i'm not arguing, i'm just i say that what is the difference in calculation, what is mobilized is considered from the first day of even study, and for a soldier it looks like it turns out the difference, but they do the same thing, and sometimes even more. understand, come on, you still do it. here. i agree that it is not necessary to follow linear logic. there is absolutely no need to be afraid of what we do not need to be afraid of, we need to win. that's

it. that's it, we need to go to this in the ways of demo weapons that we have. i remember that, too, nuclear weapons. it's not just some bomb, where lying. this property of the entire russian people has been gained through suffering, the most difficult times are precisely russian. this is our property and we have the right to use it to protect our motherland to change the doctrine. it's probably a paper to write. here is the decision to make. this is probably worth it. well, about the non-linear last one. madura called for the creation of a bloc of anti-american states. we as reacted to it in any way. why why if it is obvious we are able to say so, well, almost war. why explain i would be happy with this idea, maybe we are waiting for something. but, to be honest, this topic is such a debate. if it is impossible to use tactical nuclear weapons, why did the state offer money for

its production, because in the sixties there was an idea that these tasks could be used against states that did not possess nuclear weapons in order to save forces , money, and so on. yes, i read the documents of the general staff of our soviet provisional command of staffs on this matter. this is exactly what happened. for this you do everything shells. but let's say it's consent because america has practically developed, probably, a weapon to fight soviet tanks with an electronic bomb. they are developing nuclear weapons for this, you know perfectly well the principle of using nuclear technology. it does not become non-nuclear technology, will you have it hydrogen neutron or any. another or there is a classic classic, but here we are talking about something else. there are issues that the military must decide, because the objective is not the use of nuclear weapons must decide

civil authorities. otherwise, we will be a military dictatorship. no, no, that is, of course, this is a matter that the supreme commander and the military, but not the civilian authorities, decide. wait, and this is the civil authority, elected by the citizens of the civil authority. no, there is a calling , sir, there is a speech directly in front of the president. yes, but there is also a nuance in the work of tactical weapons. after all, this is not the most destructive weapon. so what is it? this is not the most harmful weapon of the much more terrible in its consequences, for example, chemical logic and so on. and this, too, is decided by the civil authorities , no doubt it was the civil authorities who decided all the time to sign treaties, and the impossibility of its application. yesterday, two cases of the use of chemical weapons by ukraine were recorded, yes. and who will not hear us, but it should be decided by the authorities, who then need to answer this. here they are already using the weapons

that we believe should be and in any way. here we are then, as we must, we must specifically this particular case, this particular happening. i can probably make it out so to speak, but the problem is, now, by the way, on this occasion, that we are the first of them, the most important thing that we have not done. we did not explain to the whole world and did not threaten the west that we understand what kind of war they are waging against us to the world, firstly, that not a single person, including maduro, will say, if we shy away with nuclear weapons, there would be an incident sort of, even more yes, we don't give a damn about it, at least one person or not. if we decide what to work, if because eternal then there will be an increasing focus on the opinion of the outside world. every time she got russia into trouble. always and this is our big problem. we are always trying to find out what princess maria alexandrovna thinks and when we start to act on the paradox of the impudent harshly, why is it so on the paradox of the nuclear you must be fine. which one should come out? yes, i do not know

the leader of the smugglers to destroy all. well, which one is very easy to name? well , it's like, well, what will i not name? how is it on the air there is a company that deals weapons are not smuggled into nato without them in ukraine. it had to be done, that moment the northern streams. the same day it was necessary to make for them a consumable for them strange expenses in his place. no one else will come to the place of this saying that the entire supply chain will fall apart. it never works like that. there is money there. always, it turns out lyudynorbieva ruined the chechen opposition, and this will not stop the supply of weapons. in any case, you need to eat creative. certainly. well, listen, well, stop , of course, it's not that the charyan has fallen apart. republic at all. and if you look at how the stand is going all over the world, the arms barons are regularly removed and regularly reappear as it was and is and will always be as he wrote, comrade marx well, you

are not a marxist, but mars burned down, but at that rate, the profits on which they support crime entrepreneurs for big money. they will do everything and even though they are such nuclear weapons or 60 therefore, therefore , the connection is like hunting, which are nuclear weapons with russia south korea. they are not away from the doctrine, which have three, well, they did not cancel the publication. no, right? we must speak now. oh, suddenly we will be condemned here by a country that used no other way out. yes, well, what if we say in advance what is what? we will not touch the advantage, why and for so many years we spent money on this. if we initially say that we are generally incomprehensible hamsters, they are a bear and therefore go in our face. we must look around all the time, and suddenly the hare will fart in our direction. if we do something wrong, instead of just putting a bunch on his head and saying

you will continue to say something, and also paw the motherfucker, although he doesn’t want to, because the paw will have to be dirty, how difficult it is for men nightmare yes, yes, here’s a discussion in the studio, uh, reminded me. to me one saying of the classic of the new japanese literature renesque akuta, agave, he died in the twenty-seventh year of 1927. i even did before hiroshima nagasaki. it seems to me very important its time, remarks life is like, a box of matches is treated seriously stupid stupid not treated seriously. dangerous meaning of this statement in in the continuation of all our conversations, especially in the speech of sergei sanych, the fact that carelessness in relation to life in relation to the assessment of what is happening is an extremely dangerous thing. each of us. uh, especially being

in this studio, which watches millions of people around the world responsibly, not only for themselves , for their loved ones, for the society in which we live, for the country. and of course yes. on the one hand, we are analysts and my experts, but the greatest responsibility lies with the people who are vested with power in social and political institutions. and we are great we understand that they can be like open public ones. so naturally and closed, and here it is panopsy. how did our show start? these people, and above all , bear a great responsibility for what is happening in the modern world. in 597, in the book, the step of the planet earth fixed its hierarchy. uh, world power, he identified five categories. uh, the owners of the game are the players. uh,

assistant players, pieces and beaten pieces. and of course, this is meta- this is not science. yes, this is a metaphor, but very often it is a metaphor that allows one to penetrate into the nature of the true authorities. and by the way, uh, well, a few years ago. my colleague. like-minded person. e well-known in belarus kirill evgenievich kokte, who wrote an excellent work called the theory of metaphor and political institution. so the metaphor still has theories. and so, and in our country in russia , oleg markeev developed this concept in brilliant novels. oh, by the way, his death is very strange in 2009. it leads many researchers of his work, what exactly revealing the nature of power. he paid the price for this. so, he brought out three. uh three the main positions are the masters of the world game. this is again the players and pieces, by the way, very revealing. what else in the middle of the xix

century. these are the masters of the world game premier, uh, the british engine disrali called as the masters of history, that is, there are such creators of history, so, but to today's division, yes, the owners of the world game, players and figures. the hosts see everything the whole alignment. yes, world politics determine uh, who and how to play players independent independent? yes, to some extent independently, but still they act according to rules, uh, which are determined by the owners and, moreover, by the owner. it can be easily changed, and the players in turn move the pieces. moreover, the figure does not understand what she is doing, and she may even have breakdowns, personal tragedies, in particular. many. uh, analysts write that these breakdowns can be observed corny in

alcoholism and drugs such a figure. we know very well, on which in the end, uh, many, uh, and even players converge. in particular, the last ones. hmm, this one here is an interview with e naftala on bento that we recalled today, and the fate of one of one of these figures suggests that, in principle, this one here is understandable. yes, there are independent players, there are players with disabilities, but there are pieces. and so it seems to me that in modern europe, and this, by the way, the first frames of our program perfectly showed, and independent e high-ranking clerks, who could even be called players. no, they don’t exist, e the fact is that the real normal government, which plays its own game, which has a specific goal, must have knowledge, and power, who do not possess this knowledge or possess only partially. it only leads to destruction. it sows stupidity at once

, and so on, and at one time, evaluating the revolution in france in 1848, marx and engels wrote. now we know what role stupidity plays in history and, uh, how the bastards know how to use it. this is a player is a player. yes, now we can still walk , yes, on our territory, but you understand, the independence of the players, it can vary, because there are no players in europe, but i would say that, well, if europe looks a little wider there, then of course, well, that is, we look back at the degree of independence, of course, any player. maybe, uh, because of his strong-willed qualities. yes, uh, by virtue of support in europe, there are worms, there is also hungary who play, which is not a coffin created

by an enemy that becomes a player. he was not a player, but the environment made it possible for him to become a player. that's exactly what was not a player, if bloggermania conditions could uh give the player some kind of handicap, but i'm talking about uh, this stupidity, which the bastards can use yes and it turns out that a certain part of, uh, european. uh, uh figures, uh, and the owners are pure water bastards because they use the most, let's say, unscrupulous methods of struggle. and the goal of the game is any. what an achievement of certain goals, yes, which set the owners, yes, and today once again in history we are faced, or yes, with the hypothetically hypertrophied goal

of the west, this is the destruction of russia, but we have our own goal. yes, the revival of the country, the preservation of the country, and therefore, here, here, uh, you need uh use all available arsenals, and everything can be defeated. and yet, i am inclined to what sergei alexandrovich said about the alternative steps that are not calculated by e, by the owners and players on the other side of our actions. this is a very important approach. this requires knowledge. we must know their problems very well. that's right, we should. yes, they are waging an indirect war with us precisely because our elites are well known. we will go. we must read it well to know, and for a year they have been beating their foreheads in the same place, they supply more and more weapons. no, no, they read everything perfectly. they, of course, read. they were sure that there would already be such unrest in russia. i just wanted to ask a question because i don't really understand. here you are interested in formulating their

tasks to destroy us, and our task is to be reborn. it doesn’t happen in battle that was once said and that it still became a slogan. kill the german, schwartz, do you hear? kill the german how many times you see, only once. kill at the front. that’s all, this whole shobla is called the germans and it doesn’t matter who they even called our goal is global to be reborn. we can only defeat it naturally. now, if we formulate the task not to win. and if you win, then true courage begins in the absence of reflection on the consequences of your actions. as other japanese said, who technically could not read any havana, because the samurai ran out before. yes, but here it raises a question. and, if we do not break the consequences of an act, then they begin to fear you. well, it is the determination that must

be prepared. well determination must be rational, and the japanese check everything. well, what is important, and therefore it is necessary to what i said that knowledge today is power, if we use the knowledge of different people in different areas, starting with technological technical military and ending with a really super intellectual product that we have specialists somewhere as we have said more than once to kill the needle. uh, with this needle, we can and they will think about their problems, starting. here is a good example of dim with this ball. yes. uh, the chinese did the same, they did the same, and there are a huge number of the same examples. they themselves must get bogged down in their problems so that it is impossible for them to think about what other tanks to put there, so here, uh, we are talking about an integrated approach in setting goals and in uh. e

use of funds, that's just so that these bastards bastards remember for the whole century lying there, at least. yes, and the nearest one to meddle here, it is impossible for any parameters. connect the acceptance of payments by qr-code in the tinkoff business application and accept payment via phone or terminal. open an account for business, but tinkoff.ru receive credits instantly and without a commission in full. he is so alone with wilson you can fall asleep in just 20 minutes walson lovers of sleep electronic audiobooks in one place to listen when it is inconvenient to read the choice is always yours they are attracted to each other to read when it is inconvenient to listen. switch

from text to audio to one, already from the first day of admission, the severity of the symptom of influenza and sars begins to decrease, regardless of the type of virus, therefore kagocel above the antiviral measure carries money. cherkizovo imagine what we're going to have for dinner tonight i'm cooking meat, i can't resist my own farms and natural spices, cherkizovo and it's so delicious for me a new platform on which there is something to catch with a dimer now in your hands a powerful set of games and exclusives and cloud gamer to play from any computer at maximum speed

for those who do not tolerate restrictions in image quality, look, e-sports, if you like scooter dumplings, then you can do with them. so they are cooked in the traditional way. prescription. do you remember how the minutes drag on in the gas lines? no? install the tinkoff app and pay for fuel in the city section with a cashback of up to 10 percent tinkoff city meet here tinkoff he is such one with pasta and mashed cutlets, only cherkizovo from his own meat. super season, simply incredible

sergey lazarev and valeria got up all seven out of seven times. yes, this has never really happened. i really think that everyone sings sergey i see you are a happy season.

watch tomorrow at 21:20. outwardly the jews from here will bring you to the rank. this is the front line. this is where to withdraw from the directors of the liquidation. save what it is remember, we never lost it, even in bad times no one does. they pray meet. here 's the infusion, they've been praying for it for 2,000 years. and how will the groom be in hebrew? you don't know, i want to shoot? you just show how to throw

he's just francis, but let him be the first best pope in the world. listen, good people,

so i'm ready to commit to say french. laws criminalizing lgbt people are sin and injustice because god loves the lgbt community. i hope this is actually some kind of humorous site posted. i hope it's not true that the criminalization of homosexuality is a problem that cannot be ignored, the french first told reporters on board the plane after returning from an african trip. i understand correctly that pope francis will finally come out with a bull condemning the lord for the destruction of sodom and gomora and will personally apologize

deeply, experiencing the deaths of their relatives in the two higher mentioned settlements and compensation on behalf of the catholic church, therefore, now you are generally talking about everything, therefore, when you talk about something about the fact that we see something we are doing by satanists. this is just pure satanism, and the lord has already once ordered the satanists to remind you that the garden agreements were destroyed by fire and the grays coming with them with the right weapons. dmitry your words. well beautifully went into the trump cards. yes, i mean a little different description the west has, but in any case the european parts of it are accurate. ah, to talk about the fact that someone is a player there, someone is not a player, someone is a figure and that's it. this is the fundamental one. i think there's a guess here. it is not true that they are politicians in general in europe of politicians. no, well, that is, someone tried to

make them out of himself, but there are no politicians there. and those who tried to be at least a little bit cleared them out. in many ways and uh this is a corporation on this people are quite high placed in high level managers, who receive appropriate bonuses high salary content respect in society uh, and uh, carry out office instructions. they do not understand the meaning of what is happening, they only remember what they read at the trainings. as in any large corporation, yes corporations, for example, have a code of ethics of some kind called a or b or c codes of ethics. these corporations also have them there, everything is very good. everything is very similar, in general. these are the so-called elite. it is always a particularly european part there somewhere in other parts. the west has strength who are trying to resist this, but

for europe, this is definitely an absolutely refined representation of a transnational corporation. and only she expanded so much that she captured. everything is not there, politicians. no. well, yes, there are choices. they even sometimes interestingly passed from the sixteenth to the nineteenth year, until they enlisted their posts, but these are typical people who work in large international companies have such our citizens. who works in such companies. i myself worked for such a company, talked with people, who work there. they have absolutely the same psychology and once asked one of the citizens who work. she was very proud to work there. i ask her. that's what you told me. and why are you there , like, what's the matter here? i thought maybe money. maybe something else. i say what the company does in general. so, like, what's the point? well, you know this, flour, well, what are you, i work in an international company. there can be nothing more than this. and that's it, and then the way of life you

think, just like that, so to speak, the finnish young lady went, so to speak, to shoot on the phone, and here i am at this party. yes, not with us. that's all any managers here in large companies behave like this as soon as they grab this one. well, how would your chump fence. they behave like this and behave here with the same psychology. everywhere jones on himself. something more thinking. yes, so to speak, they arrange other parties, but they behave the same. ah he increasingly-??? cocaine there with all affairs. well, at least he went. well, at least i went to fight my cheeks, by the way, saying, why then, when he first arrived, it was dangerous. and then, as it were, they allowed it. he knew that if they don't hit you next to zelensky. i think no. i think that he did not particularly know, again, whether they are plotting against each other, of course, yes. in any transnational corporation. there, all the departments are with each other, like spiders in a bank to squeeze their budget. this is all the fifth tenth. yes, this is how it 's set up. we assume that they have, but

really some kind of political component. you see, this is moreover, the most the main thing for a year and a half is that europe is now completely losing its political destiny or it was not, they have never fundamentally built such a european elite that is managerial in its essence, which is why they love to obey the higher authorities who sit in brussels and the brussels authorities to the washington authorities . and this, by the way, was a very interesting creation for trump when he came to them in brussels and began to tell them that i do not need you. you are nobody to me this is a wonderful photo when they everyone is looked at as if they had no severance pay. so, for example, i looked. if we don't accept that they're just the way they are. we cannot fight them. by the way, i insist that they really don’t understand a lot about us, but something from the point of view of the reaction of our elite, they understand and understand well, there is inertia.

analytical centers are working. here is another one. how to say so, no, contradictory, by the way, that's what they are, so to speak, managerial. this means that they fundamentally and always brought up without responsibility, because this is the system of a transnational corporation. this one is like a pyramid. most importantly, nemo should go upstairs in time. that's it, there's nothing more. and there there can be only the most sneaky people, so to speak, it is clear that they are trying to unscrew something for themselves, for example, a new budget. here drag this is any even an american film. look at how these corporations live all the time to each other, so to speak, they understandly sit there until they hit in the head and brought up in them irresponsibility moreover, they are absolutely sure of two things. the first is that even if there is some kind of nuclear war there , it is not limited such that they will survive. well, somewhere in the contract there will be such a clause. it will not be executed. saint do not

believe in the contract. this is the first second. i am absolutely not here, i am 100% sure that they knew from the very beginning there would be no maidan students in moscow. first of all, because the americans knew it, no one in the biden administration. they are generally, so to speak, around the opposition think tanks, nobody about it from the very beginning did not speak, and their task in society is not in this and with this task. they're doing great. they locked up. e russia from a military point of view in the theater of operations strictly in ukraine, which we sergey alexandrovich spoke about from a technological point of view, they forced our business ita. basically, as she said , redirect to asia. here we are now. turkey has long been trying to withdraw from service our civilian aircraft carriers boeing airbus, but there is nowhere for them to be serviced. now they have a big earthquake tragedy over comrade help. they refer to it all. now, now the big question certainly cannot fly. what will you ride? but this is also such a very question all

this redirection. you see, import substitution, when one import is replaced by another. this, after all, is also really, yes, if we are talking about that. that the russian people, uh, begin to settle down in the war war, this is not only happening in our southwestern strategic direction. for all for all that our prayers are now with our warriors, there, the war takes place at so many points in the technological one, in the economic one, in the infrastructural one , and in any other one . it is necessary to build a completely different country. we have so far, by the way, by the way, these people are an amazing thing. with all the fact that we consider ourselves smart , wonderful advanced, certainly not satanic. so far they have us, in spite of everything, they are only a spirit, they could not read us, but how will it work? we in this situation seem to have read very well, because they are searching. and we say, well, this is already unacceptable. but they blow up

the northern streams. well, it's a terrorist attack. they turn off the elevator, we say, let's try to trade in yuan. understand it is necessary in my opinion in this situation. finally , start taking initiative. and by the way, it's a shame. that the first to create a bloc of anti-american states was proposed by some maduro, and not by some kind of motor . well done kim jong-un, fuck them. you see, they put such a god unmeasured, it turns out they did an eprst with him. why because they know that he will say exactly that, yes, he will do everything he can politician, well , of course, you can not go through the topic of the earthquake. we talked a lot about the turkish situation. assyrian , because tartus lataki suffered. aleppo aleppo

is also there, and the citadel is a monument. the world has suffered. it is interesting how the west will act. and this is the territory that is controlled by the government of the legitimate government of syria, how will they provide help, or in this case they have political expediency, will again take up the human. he'll see. well, actually, yes, but , you know, elena georgievna made such, uh, such analogies, i'm not a doctor, i'm just a candidate of sciences. and now i can’t get rid of the feeling that i’ve seen it all somewhere, and i remember the films of the stalinist couple, that the intrigue, that roma was enchanted, that’s one on one, especially when i saw the images of these western politicians. they are so caricatured, behold, there is always an enemy. he is so caricature, very accurately captured the characteristics of each were churched. this is bukharin or some petty dirty trick that harms, poisons and so on.

it feels like we are confronted by these actually caricatured images in such an absolute evil, and all we say is that we don’t forget the logic of these films from 1919. what it all starts, everything is gone. not very good at the front. as many five hundredths say, then just deserters and cowards didn’t know these words, which even chapaev take there, they all run, uh, and then a person appears. well, usually this is the same iosefitsirenovich who puts things in order, which, as he puts things in order. first, he mobilizes everyone, he says, the communists go ahead. all others are second. he cleans the rear, as i still remember the phrase from one movie. they say that now the communists detachments of st. petersburg workers will go to the submersible quarters. they went and found 7,000 cannon rifles in uh the english embassy and found out what they were preparing and the next moment. he

acts against. that's what sergey alexandrovich was talking about linear logics, for example, e. well, it's not a movie anymore. this in reality, when stalin was like this, uh, the rebellion on krasnaya gorka during uh, the defense of petrograd, and stalin m. almost literally protsi. uh, such a report. lenin wrote that i was told that from the point of view of marine science, everything that i do is wrong for my personal interference in business. it would count science, and we won the third. i assure you that i will continue to do so. that is, it is actually all the time these qualities. they are known. this is the will of determination, cleaning the rear, mobilization and unpredictability for the enemy. that's what happening. now. let's be frank about what we all talk about and what their analysts write about. we don't like it. we argue with this, but russia is fighting and the opposition to the west is an order of magnitude lower than

its superpower capabilities allow. or at least a great power by an order of magnitude. below. that's what we're talking about. russia is not using its full potential to use nuclear weapons, not to try on things not only in this. in fact, the west has driven russia into the logic of iran of the iraqi war, where, as they write, there are two approximately equal sides. they are writing at the front. established balance. listen. what kind of balance can great russia have with the zelensky regime in principle. it's just that there iraq was stuffed with various soviet western weapons, iran there were all these uh geshefts, rankontrols and so on. and they, as it were, equalized them like this, they clobbered each other for 8 years, then they will go there, then they will go here. here they are driving russia exactly into this logic of their goal, obviously, yes, the color revolution did not happen, but russia, by such

actions, so that we do not say, yes, they put forward well done society rallied. we belarusians are with you. yes, and not in words, but in deeds, but at the same time it lowers the status of russia in the international army. and even now, if you continue to act like this, in principle, you can defeat the incredible strain of effort with a lot of blood. uh, heroism can be won, but it can get out, but russia will come out of this war, weakened in this case, if it does not show determination, so i brought stalin. how to put for example, and what did soviet russia win? in the twenty- second year of the civil war, she left the great power no, and had to, then to restore this status with the hardest efforts. she won, but was immediately forced to demobilize the army there six times. she was thrown back in conditions of non-recognition and isolation, and in those conditions it was extremely difficult. once again i say at great

expense i restored my status. here is the question that arises at this stage, what do we want. well, yes, victory at any cost or a victory that will ensure the creation of that very new world, because the victory of russia does not guarantee that this new world will simply be possible to win, so undermine all their internal social positions. that's what we laughed at so much maduro proposed his death to the american states that well, let's say, i don't separate you and me. here we are our union state, because here is the logic. we should have a shared one, but we don't offer. we say nothing to ukraine there, but we offer nothing to the world, what we offer there . latin america and steps are being taken, but each time it feels like we are a little late. that's impossible to say. that's what russia, in principle, threw down this challenge. it's already huge. this already commands respect, but further steps must be taken. and and this is

just an indispensable condition, yes, to achieve victory. if our discussions are here, here we sometimes have a talk with sergius aleksandrovich. well, what can we here shake the air like he says, we were given this bedside table here, but if what we are saying here will contribute to the resolution of these problems and the historical analogies that we bring here. it's the same anyway. uh, not the first generation of our people that has been put in this position when we say about age-old russophobia. oh, and many years of confrontation with the west. so we have a positive experience, not only north korea, iran or venezuela, and we have this victorious experience, we have this experience, when we were just reviving and now drawing these analogies. we are natural. well , we just want to give you a hint. to those people, i don’t know the military, well, as i correctly said, comrade general here specialists

should, because we are still people in civilian political authorities, but most importantly, this is how we go to the front, we we travel across the country. we see that people want this, this is the request of society, what we are saying to vladimir vladimirovich here. i want to combine two theories of games, the theory of players of pieces, and the theory of monakers of managers. and imagine a house in which a different game is played on each floor here on the billiard table here chapaeva here in good chess. and someone thinks that he plays poker and is very good at bluffing the rest of someone betting the old fashioned way. at the same moment, with the same cards , playing the folding fool is really a real fool every time. how to throw him some cards, he rejoices and itches. what are we going to do now, but in fact, this house may belong to someone, their differences. no, who is playing something. i 'll tell you about monaco. so. if you take a small party or some

power there. they believe that they are sovereign players looking at the global world. no, they serve the interests of a limited liability company. completely, but i would greatly underestimate not to leave them all in one row. so we started today with anlin, burbock. i think she's with this joke about leopards. and our professionally came out. well , everything was invented and it already happened. here you say that something reminds. it definitely reminds me of something one german. uh, current political scientist. now i asked a publishing house in russia to find such a book about the details of how american business financed the fuhrer. and why was it necessary? here i see how she is lena ber god today very clearly understands with whom she is flirting. she does not speak with the ukrainian people, she does not poland neighboring says. she speaks directly to that american big business that needs the fuhr in germany, she was everything in the top three contenders for the chancellorship. today

, the polls show that she is ahead of scholz in popularity in germany. yes, she deceived her voter. so what? well, they promised weapons not to supply, well, we deliver, but yesterday's, and morality today is normal, well, leopards, but i beg you, who are the russians and here it turns out that he is a big player. who owns this house of historical events clearly highlights certain people who follow a certain route, and she is a manager on the line manager - this is secondary, she clearly won applause in the hall in which other politicians were sitting opposition politicians. she showed that without sholtsy. it could just as well be in the cabinet of ministers, and maybe the chancellor was clapped there by those who today have also been replaced by the chancellor for a month, they really don’t care about external forces. who will be chancellor there? the main thing is that leopards are supplied while as the chairman with the traffic police say today, that suddenly, after germany announced that it was ready to supply leopards, there was not a single application from any european country,

that is, they all spoke out politically, but this one is about such a popular procedure when you need to send a request . they don't make it to germany. they all disappeared with the horizon and right here. whether you like it or not, you like it there, or you don't like it, no matter what we say in this studio about the fact that there is no water in crimea, in the west they are silent. e in the donbass genocide on the west is silent propaganda of the kremlin as soon as solovyov says as for the nuclear bond of the bomb, alas, the kremlin scares through the mouth of solovyov , everyone immediately hears it as soon as the studio begins to talk about the fact that a nuclear strike is not necessary. it must be armageddon as explained. it can be, so you know, 24 km, flew 1.5 km, funnel funnel, where the funnel. you know, the germans ask me if the train rides in it, all the disgusting , corrupt, vile elite of the european union, which clearly says we will continue to finance. we will continue to train soldiers in the mode in which you are now fighting, the war will not end. no, she will continue to

question you. but if there is an agreement not to bomb politicians, who is stopping you from breaking up the railway track before and after and they, by the way, had a dress code, they explained that when you are next to zelensky, you set up to be photographed, do not try to wear, for example, green clothes. that's right. that's because you'll blur, then about the champagne earlier. politicians. came there with klitschko on the balcony. there hmm drinking champagne. now they say, not a single photo. this does not mean that he does not drink champagne, but they were able to actually take the train. well, here, here, here they would be cut off, well, somehow on buses. i don’t know, really , the next ones didn’t go down for the sake of tourism, but because they would be scared, but they are not afraid, and then i return to sergey who says. well, listen. this is my interpretation now. and where is the ultimatum? where is the red line that no one sees all the political. uh, players. they are colorblind, they turned out to have a line, but there is no red color, they really will transfer the polish ambassador

in berlin earlier . pavlov, you will give pavlas in general about him. never heard. and now he says that in a week there will be a munich security conference, and there they will directly discuss the delivery of aircraft. and i want you to not discuss, so that you come to a decision when you put it on. here you are on the eve of the munich conference. i just i will say. well, how many 2 weeks are left, there are incomplete, here is the true moment, because they are confident in safety. they don't feel this security. they have not only a category of thinking, we are managers who are corporate berlin do not need to answer this question, because if you, god forbid, answer it, you will be imprisoned in germany, because germany is a criminal place with some statements. berlin is not necessary. but the rumor is to talk about the moment when you need to change, if there is support among the people, and i constantly talk about it

ask in russia will change the doctrine doctrine with such support of the people published study of the hungarian. someone e about the support of the peoples of the eu countries that supply weapons to ukraine, only nine countries more than 50% have the support of the people, the rest are less than 50%. that is, the government decides on the supply, but there is no support from the people. here, it is the whole democracy. this is how it will continue, but every time the discussion rises every time they speak, i don’t find out they say, but in russia they will have laws observe. yes, there is a law, and one must act according to the law, the only sign that something can change. this is when it will start at the official level, as did urban , he asked the people for a referendum, he arranged the issue , he arranged it in this regard. everything is very simple, as soon as the first bell rings, that the assembled expert group. there, the commission of the security council in russia before the light of the federation or in the house, that is, according to the protocol of the state , will begin to reflect on how

the military doctrine is changing, and how many more leopards can you really put a leopard? they will embroider the road in sevastopol with a cross ; they will not embroider ; they will be customized this spring; so, when the doctrine changes, then they begin to listen, when the doctrine changes precisely on the use of nuclear weapons in the same way , when they talk about space in exactly the same way, when they talk about tankers, which for some reason can block the suez canal. i fully agree that if you play according to their logic, then this is their game, and those non-standard decisions that may be they should surprise them then. i think it will become peaceful very quickly now advertising. more precisely, we will continue with the new composition. from the injustices of the treaty played a huge role in everything in the further development between the military world, the most prosperous country in europe at the epicenter of the global crisis. the crisis of german

industry is much stronger than the united states of great britain march, gold, which cost about 10,000 paper years. it was already worth billions in circulation. was about a hundred trillion. in in search of germany's salvation, fascism chooses. a large part of the population required a government that could toughly and clearly deal with the challenges that the most economic crisis bears . premiere sunday after midnight on the russia channel grandiose premiere on the russia channel please love fedor chaliapin he is a brilliant amazing artist, where was he, what kind of grunt

was not cut? from february 13 at 21:20 on the channel , russia deservedly voted for you

will turn from a strict judge into an enthusiastic spectator. this is all valeria's emotions, we were all captured and thank you. and how musical magic affects irina ponarovskaya , they will follow you. come on, all together, the battle of the seasons

everything hangs in such a thread is worth calling max to tell who you are. why did you come and the hair will break the time of the daughters on saturday and sunday at 13:05 on the russia channel 60 minutes. we have a special issue, we start with urgent news 60 minutes. don't miss tomorrow at 11:30 and 17:30 on russia channel can get in touch. once again, it’s true

, you are surprised that the european madness that they say, but we will probably help these syrians, but with these we have no mechanism. and of course, i think that now zelensky has the main problem, he will probably say that russia hasn’t blamed it yet, but in order to divert attention from ukraine, he already has only one thought, that everything that happens in the world in order to divert attention from ukraine, he already needs to keep his attention on ukraine all the time because it's happening. yes, nothing happens. the truth about the losses is gradually coming out, and it is so terrible that ukraine prefers to remain silent. today, in this regard, is the day of such revelations, first there are american experts, then the turkish press, citing israel, suddenly starts talking

about the real losses of ukraine , while the worst thing for ukraine is not only what they say, these are real losses, but they show that well, an order of magnitude less than the loss of russia, that is, all ukrainian propaganda is a lie, second very important point. suddenly he said, it’s clear that, well, he can’t even remove zelensky as the minister of defense. she. so you're just the degree of his competence and capabilities are severely limited. that is, some rumors were not spread, including people close to zelensky, that now we will change the minister of defense, nothing of the kind is being found out. why? well, clearly, why the concentration? ukrainian politicians are not defined by completely different people from not quite other countries. this also needs to be clearly understood. it's the same, well, destroys the illusion that zelensky is a bold additional

fragment that he would have told, because he still agreed. what, well, yes, that's the promise that putin gives, he always keeps. well look, here's what bennett is telling. i worked out the following formula, we provide as much humanitarian support as possible, but there will be no transfer of weapons and left putin aware of all his steps. so, for example, i told putin i was going to open a military hospital in lvov, when they called him , he called on the phone. i want to inform you. he answers. if you give me you will promise that you will not use the hospital as a shelter for soldiers or weapons. if you don't use it military, that's no problem. send me the coordinates and i 'll make sure it doesn't get blown up. and

this lord, then everything was done here. all his bravado is on the head, because he knows that if putin has given his word, he keeps it, and what he yapps will be topped up, but this is generally ridiculous in front of me. notice, yes, how our country still fulfills, but still, the elements of the diplomatic protocol. and when dmitry sergeevich peskov was asked to confirm or about the correct words of banton, he said that we do not disclose our practices or our rules, the results of bilateral negotiations. well, let's get back to this topic again. well, look , the turkish side claims that ukraine has lost over 157,000 people killed. 234.000 previously 17.230 in captivity military instruction 234

nato soldiers write turks not volunteers but soldiers 2.458. it's basically comparable. uh, with losses, you need 5.360 dead in iraq, that is total difficulty. we only counted more than eight thousand various foreigners. and, of course, terrible numbers destroyed by technology. well, it's clear now. now it is clear why even in england they began to send out messages that for ukrainian refugees, that they are required to appear at the embassy of military age. it is also interesting here that europe shows that of course, sorry. but no one here needs you ukrainian refugees. you are meat. you must go to war. and by the way, you 'll be fine. here is a ukrainian journalist

the media asks the military and he answers with optimism. i talked to the guys who take out our 200s and 300s. they said that an untrained fighter, according to their rating, lives in bakhmut for four hours on the front line, so, yes. hmm, this is some very negative statistics. i think it's longer. but if we talk about negative statistics, then listen to what douglas mcgregor, a former colonel of the us army, says that the elderly, when he spoke to the us secretary austin from general mill, he really told them that 257.000 ukrainians had died, including 257.000 soldiers in civilian uniforms. today. in ukraine

, there are approximately 18 to 22 million people left under zelensky’s control, this number is approximately equal to the number of inhabitants. the netherlands cannot win a war with such a population. vladimir vladimirovich well , by the way, it is no coincidence that the army of the netherlands has already ordered the debt to live in fact. now they are discussing it, it is slowly joining the german army and i am watching the dutch press already writes. listen, when we lost the war, that is, here you are, there is no longer such an army, with regard to losses near artyomovsk. uh, here again, the dutch volks crane today put an article about, almost detailed chronology there, when the battle began, almost on the streets they paint in artyomovsk, where what battles are fought, and so on in detail there with descriptions of where what battles were

for what factories and so on. as a result, it is concluded that the city does not have any military strategic significance at all. the question is why did you describe these battles for so long and in detail. yes and so take it, well, our liberation. troops, respectively, just a symbolic comparison will matter. yes, like the hoisting of the red banner over the reichstag in 1945, that is, an amazing comparison. yes, that is, it turns out to free artyomovsk from these ukrainian nazis, which, in fact, is tantamount to the capture of berlin in 1945. according to this very dutch newspaper, well, that is, even if such symbolism, then and then, i only for, but it's clear that there is not only a symbolic meaning, of course, judging by the photographs with which the same article is provided, yes, and many materials from the artyomovskaya of these western journalists. now they are digging trenches

in the open field of western artyomovsk in a hurry, which once again indicates that they have additional defensive lines there , up to the slavic kramatorsk, of course. no, that is, there is an open field and, accordingly, there are such fortifications that have been prepared for 8 years. tinted such large powerful e, by and large west of artyomovskaya. no, that is why it will be very important to break through this line of strengthening this line of defense of ukraine while continuing these wild comparisons made by the western press. listen , in germany they were really indignant at these words of vladimir putin e where he reminded that again tanks with german crystals appear on our soil on the land of ukraine in historical russia yes uh. that's what these parallels with nazi germany and so on. i really look, after all, how it is podoliak said what tanks with christs, who saw them? yes, as if he does not see. with what crosses are german tanks going to be sent

to ukraine but today the daily mail is printing. so that's also interesting. so you know the anticipation. now that's interesting. to finally wait for the battle of these obsolete russian military hippos. e. with the latest german tanks, and this is right, here, as a parallel with the battle of kursk in 1943 and then a huge article of the battle of kursk. how many losses, how many tanks, they themselves draw such parallels, so what excuse me putin was wrong. here you yourself are drawing parallels against the nazis , hoisting the red banner over the reiksta. i restlessly revive this nazism at home. and, by the way, it is not by chance that now here is a sensational case, vagaya. they hid some kind of online education course, where they taught children to be good nazis, etc. well, there's a scandal, in principle, sorted out. this is not ukraine. for now, it seems shocking, but at the same time

that the authorities say something, but a violation of the law. no, we cannot legally prosecute them. well think nazism preach. well, if russia was praised for it and so on, it's another matter. well, the last. i know the time a little you just said. zelensky is tired, i told you in detail yesterday how many parties of the movement really fought in italy. pacifist activists are against zelensky performing at e, the most popular san remo song festival. oh well, and today the organizers, under pressure from the public, said at least they backpedaled, they said there would be no video message. what everyone opposed, and are going to, by the way, demonstrations are still being held on this day, we will read out some kind of greeting from zelensky on a piece of paper. well, you know, a little, but, nevertheless, for people who are fighting for peace, there really is peace, and not for what seems to be peace from zelensky’s point of view, these notorious 10 rules of the world are 10

points of peace. uh, for them it’s some kind of no, but pobeda vladimir nikolayevich, you know, the mentioned numbers have a difference of 157-257. i think somewhere in the middle. well, maybe both are catastrophic. this is what the ukrainian authorities hush up, but it's all a disaster we remember the masterpiece. eh, cinematography by vasily bykov, only old people go to battle, and why do we know the old people? this is not by age, but by experience there are 10 sorties. he is already an old man, that is, he has some experience. so in ukraine today, only the poor are fighting, the rich and wealthy have left and taken their families. the rules sold the business or mothballed it, it is impossible to give a better gift and it is clear that they paid for the departure. those who remain are officials. yes deputies, they bought armor from they took their children there from here , they steal, they send them there, the only money left is

the poor, who rush about inside the country, but they are , in essence, caught, caught, the hunt is on. on these poor people and so on. they are from the city in the countryside. there, women are trying to create some kind of self-defense, protecting their children , protecting the children of those who have arrived, and so on, they take everyone in a row. and those who are not fit for service and age over 60 and so on. why is the military commissar atrocious and the case just brings them to the order and they say, if you don’t get enough, yes, go yourself, and don’t commit atrocities, they grab. but if they catch someone else wealthy, you need to wish. they work there for the same salary and so on. so here's a specific example. there is also a city of monasteries, because you need general specifics. uh, this is the cherkassy region near the city of uman, somewhere up to ten thousand inhabitants , the military came there for a rotation on vacation and tried to drag them with the military commissar. to

attach them to the distribution by weight. so not the local people. i realized that they are not local and that's all, as they direct in a row. to the side he asks one street or the other way for apartments removes numbers with them enters skirmishes and so on. they just stood so that they don’t want to, they say, we don’t don’t want, that is, we don’t want to give the children to be slaughtered and point at the houses of the authorities, and instead of power, and so on, i’m watching a video sequence in kharkov, a blogger, he says, guys i went out and somehow caught my eye, then i started to analyze some women in buses on the streets. well, there are up to 10% of men. why are they hiding? we saw videos when they change clothes in a store, somewhere, and so on. it's true more times, touched by not only poland in europe this is generally an unprecedented case when the poles give out individual data that have worked at the enterprise. this is an indication of the authorities to the embassy,

​​the embassy sends a summons to urgently come to you with a summons, if you refused to file a criminal case, this is the main thing. the lyaki came out, that is, they are raking out from there. everything is in the direction of where the war is until the last ukrainian and so on. now the siphonchuk, who makes the opening , the deputies do not fight. children do not fight and so on, when they ask me, do you want the defeat of ukraine, i say yes, but defeat this regime is criminal, but i want its defeat to be a salvation for ukrainians, because the least people will die, it is necessary today to save people, and not the zelensky regime . come on, give us weapons, but soon zelensky will have to ask germany, except for leopards, which, as it were, he begged for asbegons. these are sponge souls. yes, because it is necessary to strangle people in a different way. no need for probability. there he tried to adopt some

experience and steps of the ussr because he would have to suppress the internal point. he will certainly. well, on the issue. personnel of their reshuffles. and you know, it is very interesting there what personnel reshuffles are on demand. from the outside, inside one reznikov's gang , this is not an ordinary person. i personally know him, this is the most experienced lawyer who has already collected compromising evidence on everyone, he says, how are these guys a sweet berry. we ate together, yes, and i will be the only bitter berry, but would you like to share a cell with me and so on, and therefore we began internal rearrangements. let's give him something, and he says i don't agree, and that's why the whole thing slowed down this process, because he says, i was giving away numbers in general, brought something personally, what claims to me, but the edge is trying to make it, and then the story can be extended. how it was? remember with roman nasirovala. we are here with you, this is the head

of the tax administration of ukraine under poroshenko in the seventeenth year, 2 billion. this is his trifle. you know, they were arrested. until today, for five years now, he has been going to court in greenhouse conditions, sit roman someday , we will release him, because roman was also divided, therefore, this, of course, must be destroyed in terms of, so to speak, lines. and we'll see how it will be, but it is necessary to save the ukrainian people. well, if there is more about the gang here, of course, there is an external factor, because they really pressed zelensky, they pressed him on power and demanded to give up the characters, there are certain ones that are needed for tougher management. it is clear that zelensky, together with yermak, they do not want to give reznik the chief schemer, but, that is, he was appointed. actually on the ministry of defense in order to control military budgets, and he he sawed volzhsky very successfully, but he was related to whom, who raised him, and he is in yerma

, this is all this is yermak, this is yermak, this is the second fair, of course, this is yermak's team, not lawyers. they participated in many things there, but at one time he was rice of the 95th quarter, but, and he specialized in raiding and was such a rogue for ukrainian lawyers. they are special lawyer guys. basically, that is, in this category they are specialists in making money, that is, they knew who to bring in, so they cut the money. this is one of the key activities what they were actually doing. but if he is less a lawyer, he is a lawyer, he is no longer an honored lawyer. well, then you can already yes , but still a lawyer, they know a lawyer, so, well, actually, right now, this is the dirt that is happening there. it will now take place before a certain replacement, but with the option of external control, this is not so, and, uh, it will seriously affect the controllability, that is, it is not the americans who butt heads with the british. who will put the sbu of the ministry of internal affairs, uh, on naboo, whose people whose creatures will be there, because, well, ukrainians

already by tradition in the ukrainian government. people do not obey the vertical. they are looking for their support. that is, they must run to someone in order to be either promoted, or supported, or protected, respectively, they perform the tasks that come from there. show me someone who does not depend on the external ukrainian vertical, but still, in terms of numbers, the number e means 257,000, which i think is quite close to reality there. and this is an understanding that the ukrainian army is not a year old. here, it's just completely disposed of killed, and the total number. in the sense there are different interpretations, there are four hundred to 600,000 400 dashes of 600,000 killed people. there , her wounded, the injured, are among the military. i practically do not take peaceful, because almost no one read. that is, it is extremely difficult to count, uh, the number of civilians there. and let me remind you, yes, a year ago, according to the un federal official data, there were 14,000 injured, 14,000 dead, 14,000. and even now ukraine would have lost 260 already. that is, you really wanted it when you sent it. and

the troops, well, there in the donbass when they started in in mid-february, you really wanted to resolve the issue in such a way that people don’t die, and so that you get in the end, that is, here is the result, here is the result that you just came out with, by the way, today zelensky a, as for a mobilization at the office on zelensky’s website, an appeal was published today demanding bring changes to the legislation so that people’s deputies are already going to fight, they not only fought in the verkhovna rada. therefore, i think that among the people this topic is maturing, but discontent p-, uh, the fact that the government really pushes them simply to slaughter, and they themselves are in hothouse conditions. she definitely is. concerning? bennett's interview there seemed to me a number of markers that are actually very important for understanding events, firstly, with what joy they remembered this topic right now and why zelensky was suddenly reminded that i was listening

to you a year ago then putin promised don't kill and you're still alive. a. is it because the americans have now decided to remind that zelensky may be playing too much, maybe his role somehow fits smoothly about the 14th assassination lie, well, of course, lies , of course. yes, and here, firstly, and that is, the stupid question itself is removed. yes, that is russia in fact. if indeed it was as the brand says, yes, that is, and we see that there was not a single fact of a real attack on zelensky. yes, that is, therefore, there are certain things, that is , confirming that if guarantees are given in russia, then they are not violated, but even now , if guarantees are given by the americans, everything is done with precision. until the opposite, and therefore a year later the revelations that appear wonders. listen, maybe zelensky will be offered to be someone else after all. that is, in a different quality in a different form. that is, maybe it's enough to be a living ruler already. maybe it's time to move on.