yes, and to the rescuers, he fell through the ice not far from the coast, but the beast could not get out on his own, they pulled him onto land with the help of ropes and released him. the next issue of federal news will be aired at 16:00. all the news is always available on the media platform, we look in the application on the website smotrim.ru, we'll see you all. good afternoon. this is a program of who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio dmitry kulikov , the president of the people's republic of china arrived in russia on an official state visit and in his first statement said in far from

calm world. china is ready with russia to resolutely defend the o-centric international system to stand guard over the world order based on international law. i want to stress, uh, the importance of words. china is ready to stand guard together with russia. it is very important. these are the most fundamental words, which, of course, set the whole context of the visit exactly 20 years ago , the invasion of american troops into iraq began , the invasion was carried out on a false pretext and brought suffering to millions of people, czech president petr pavel launches only one attempt at a counter-offensive by ukraine in the event of its failure of other chances. ukraine it does not provide for the banking crisis in the west continues the swiss bank loan was liquidated in one day and it happened on sunday an unprecedented action in the united states

more than 200 banks may be at risk of bankruptcy, meanwhile in the states they are anxiously awaiting the possible arrest of donald trump and at the same time criminal charges against members of the biden family who received money from china before meeting with the representative the president of russia took part in the work of the board of the ministry of internal affairs here is how he singled out two fundamental tasks now facing the department. in no case should one allow unprofessional injustice in working with people, this is the most important thing to start with. this is the first part, and the second is certainly hard to stop any attempts, opponents and their agents on the territory of our country to shake our society. this activity is

one of the key areas of work against russia by the enemy. it's obvious thing. this is clear from the nature of the actions. this is clear from operational sources. we read these documents, where they set themselves the task of rocking society from within, and in this sense, the ministry of the interior faces, of course, very serious tasks. but you need to start, of course, not yourself in the first place. what is this about? i say, in no case should any injustice be allowed, they are accuracy, but a violation of the rights of our citizens. a very accurate remark, especially among those goals that the west is pursuing in relation to our country. us it has already been said many times here that in fact and based on the status of a nuclear power and based on the military capabilities of russia to take on the battlefield. the path is almost impossible , you need to pump from the inside and pump from the inside, and they they tried to do it many times. they used all sorts of bulk there. they

tried to create a fifth column and everything else, but after a year they understand that this is badly bad. but this does not mean that the west will stop doing it. that is, they they will continue to do. throw-ins. they will continue but somehow prepare provocations, on which they will have to really. with an orientation to literally provoke the fifth column, and to speak out as well, i do not exclude that the fifth colony will also step on sore calluses. this will concern, as it were, people, well, to put it mildly, the wealthy, it will touch on a sore point, that is, a business there, an asset located in the west, located in the west, and that they make the most of it, especially those enterprises that are here, which will be close, for example, there branches vk that's all it is possible that they will be taken for a for a soft spot. how to be forced to, in fact, harm our country and make the situation shake. yes, but on the other hand, the main topic of the day is also yet to come. uh, here, i noticed back in the weekend publications. e, with links to experts in china

, they noted in china. well noted separately well. uh, well, i 'll say in my own words that uh, well, with what solidarity russia met all these tests. yes. uh, for them, this is, well, such a very important symbol, which in china, uh, is watched closely and highly appreciated and believe that this is one of the main factors, yes, which allows us to operate successfully. yes, yes, the degree of social unity of the socio-political, which it is. and we have chinese experts noted separately; the chinese are aware of this. they passed the area of ​​darkness, they know what it is. they know the results of this momentary weakness. yes, that is, which was in russia, which of which i was able to overcome - i was able to overcome china at one time, therefore , now here are today's events. i think it significance. well, as it were, it is difficult to overestimate the extreme. that is, i didn’t think here, uh, you know, there are a lot of

parcels coming from the western press. here, the issue of military-technical cooperation in ukraine will be decided here, there, and so on. yes, that's not what this visit is about. basically, it's not about that. here, today, a completely different configuration of the world is being born, which means that a separate alternative point of power appears here. symbolic things are really happening here, which i do not think and do not calculate. that after these meetings. yes, that is , some details that the western press is so eager for will be brought out. no self coming here. the first after the re-election is the very fact of a state visit. at the level of leaders and such long negotiations are envisaged. they say that everything will be discussed there, but the most important thing is that it will be taken out from there. this is this rallying, this is the unification of the interests and efforts of russia and china , which will unequivocally counterbalance the americans, who will unambiguously go against. but this group , which the americans are now trying to make monolithic, that is, this collective smell, that is

, another force is now appearing against it, which in fact will first become the center, and then will attract other states to itself. and the americans cannot help but understand this, that's why they are like that with such attention and they try to blur the agenda and carefully monitor what is happening against him. yes, uh, carefully. i know so alternative. yes, because it is both china and russia emphasize in all their official positions that our cooperation is not directed against someone, just conditionally against. if i agree with you, i'm not for sports. i understand that you agree. by the way, i also can’t get rid of, for example, my own. uh, well, ways of pronunciation, how do we do it? yes, i would too if, well, like this, i would say a word against, not meaning, uh, the meaning of, uh , causing, so to speak, damage against. in terms of alternatives. i mean, on the contrary. yes, another space is created with

other approaches. e, with other possibilities and on completely different principles , and in this sense, on the contrary, as an alternative. okay come on, so i then say appears. we have conditional traditionalists who will lag behind the un rules who will leave the traditional family and so on and there will be lgbt people who say, as it were, it means, listen, and we will live not by the laws, not by international law, but by the rules and we will promote we will have a completely different agenda. this is where the separation happens. in this sense, it's the other way around. yes? by the way, they are not hide. this is uh, this is uh! we have a lot of qualified experts on international affairs here, we will discuss it, well, in my memory, like this. such a degree of this very new sincerity, as i call it? it is of course, well, at times the reaction of the master is striking, and look at the expectation of what may follow after that. it

is written in their strategic national national security tragedies against the rules based international order and many of our allies and partners. created after world war ii. it turns out they created something there they don't like it. they would like to rewrite these rules indefinitely expanding their cooperation and relationship lately. china has not condemned putin's invasion of ukraine, it still buys the oil of the energy resource, and also gave tacit approval because it took positively the statement that it poses an existential threat to russia that the west is to blame for the war. so you will watch this meeting that will take place . from monday to wednesday presiding in moscow and the state we've said this before and we'll do it again. it's again today, if i go to the meeting to say anything, it's unacceptable, because it's just for the sake of it. conquering russia today it will only give mr.

putin more time to prepare new people to plan a new offensive when it is convenient for him to be unacceptable. it will be for the united states that ukraine should continue everything that was prescribed. go die. this is how it should be. well, yes, he also says that this would be a violation of the un charter, that is. here he is covered up. i am continuing what my colleague rodion said. i would like to talk about the following, against the background of which the visit with children to moscow is taking place today against the backdrop of a number of recent events of historical proportions and all of them are about the failures of the united states at the international level, so to speak, that is this is the signing of an agreement between saudi arabia and iran on the beijing platform and, well, the obvious failure of the sanctions policy in the same and earlier by the united states of america . however, here, analyzing this, i am glad about this, yes, of course, we should not roll into a cap of denial to experience too

much this and euphoria, because absolutely truthfulness. when you talk, they will keep rocking, really. relatively recently, i had an argument with my friend, such a patriotic citizen of russia. he says, well, look, they are leaving their authority from everywhere, respectively , even the countries of europe are declining in africa in the middle east, in principle, yes, they really can’t say anything, but we see tension. here below, yes, let's wait. now let's take a closer look at ukraine. they themselves will crack. i say no. we, of course, must deal closely with ukraine, and we are doing this, but we should not expect that they themselves will crack, that they themselves will somehow jump back, but they will abandon the idea and there is no need to swing further. we have precedents for this. i'm coming back again, besides, iran is four decades old, you know? it would seem that everything that is possible has been tried while there is a wormhole inside the country, until the iranian authorities can eradicate separatist sentiments there. the terrorist factor, and so on, america will use it, and it is doing it.

it's not covered up, doing it with a reliance on europe here's a burbak. yes, she said that feminism would direct there. uh, in particular, in particular in iran yes, this is absolute nonsense. it would seem that those who know iran, e, understand perfectly well. what is what it is and how what rights do women have in general matriarchy, if something went wrong. we understand it's not about feminism we are talking about the destructive elements of all these ideologies. yes, the same terror. yes, only yes, the same eggs, but a side view, uh, which are designed to destroy the foundations of the iranian mentality of iranian culture and so on. the same thing with russia here is a copy of absolutely everything that has been used there has been tested for years and decades will be used and, in relation to us, which we oppose, again , not only thought along with those. hand in hand with those against whom this is also happening, the same china, i remind you. again, this is not mine. words about it say in the pentagon. america's defense secretary recently said that we will use the experience accumulated in ukraine. e

in taiwan we need to arm ukraine and ukraine and taiwan they are still fools there, or what? in china, they don't see it. they understand this very well in america , they call everything their own things, by the way, i really like this trend. here but you sincerity, about which you said, really. here, even with trump , such a direct general call a spade a spade began. finally. we're not here here bushy there are test tubes, these permanent ones. yes, uh, around and around no, absolutely everything. we don't need it. recently, i argued live with one american expert. yes, just a minute and i’m finishing for half a minute, but if you are like that about the international rules about the project, everything you do in syria where did the no-fly zone over tamf come from? what right? you have on the territory of a third country to organize a useless zone to ban there, he says, this is the right of the strong. well, this is how we act, that's all, yes, and it is the foundation of a world built on what is right. by the way in relation to america , the discussion is going on, because the official representatives of china media in told

the united states. what should they do with their demands for a truce. yes, and maybe you should start. with regard to the so-called remarks of sources to the us government, i would like to emphasize that it is not the chinese side that the american side is supplying weapons to the battlefield of ukraine. the american side should stop starting fires and distributing flames. stop pointing fingers at other countries to coerce and intimidate them and start playing a constructive role in the political management of the crisis in ukraine and not vice versa. maxim at the kelbe had, exhaustive from uh, speeches very clearly , he expressed his claims to china. before that, we know that american officials also express their wishes to china at different levels, but

he listened to one of the main wishes not to demonstrate direct or indirect support for russia. china or not to these wishes with a hint remark, but we see a warning, that's why the visit is the maximum visit. as far as it could be as much as possible in general, the official saturated somewhere even pompous we oh, two asian countries can do it. and this is demonstratively, of course, this is a demonstration of beijing to washington, and in response to the fact that washington actually calls everything by its proper name and does not hesitate to say that the main one is like that. here is a serious geopolitical adversary for decades, if not for centuries, this is china this is not russia well, all of russia will figure it out, let's deal with china well the chinese, the chinese hear it. the chinese understand this in this global fight. maybe they would like to avoid it. postpone the elections. the americans do not leave their directness. for which i thank them and of course it is more profitable for them, but it is more convenient to have russia on their side in this fight.

but russia will definitely already be on the chinese side. eh, there is no escape, where else is it? what are we going to do now, uh, carefully follow these three days for the wording, because there are expectations. we remember different visits here, even in our studio they said that following the results of a visit to nature onov biden's call. well call. i mean, if the dolphin isn't scheduled yet, but the president of the united states really wants to talk to the leader of the prc, the white house, in order. maybe a few days after the completion of the visit to russia will decide. when to talk, right? yes, here, but as far as we are concerned here, we are different. yes, i'm just now for a second, just about the fact that there is nowhere to go. you know, that's interesting. eh, well, in this sense, we have nowhere to go. this is quite a long time ago and the russian federation me since the seventh year. that's 15 years for a second. yes, for 15 years, russia has declared what kind

of world order it is and what it is doing, and china openly began to join this, only, by the way, from the first election. it was also his first visit, then it was to the russian federation. therefore, russia has this line, clearly marked, and russia was the first to do it. this is a line. what kind of international order are we for ? in the seventh year it was it was said about the inadmissibility of extending the jurisdiction of the united states to the rest of the world, and so on and so forth, therefore, we, well, have nowhere to go, but not in connection with china, i wanted to say this, but in connection with those who, in connection with that strategic line, which we have chosen, well, in multipolarity or will there still be two polar world, where we are building in the chinese pole. this is the question. let's carefully

follow the wording, again the third third time. i’m trying to bring my thoughts to the end , i’ll still finish that we sounded different predictions, such as the fact that almost a military union will be concluded, are very doubtful. i think china will have much more careful language. i will read you e in the article of the chairman si which he published in the russian newspaper on the news, the last phrase. there is every reason to believe that china russia as fellow travelers in the development of the renaissance will make a greater contribution to the progress of human civilization. well, random. and why did you start not to quote, because the beginning quotes everything, but only attentive people are converted only maxim pays attention to the word fellow traveler yes, that is, after all, egoists clarify how it sounds in chinese. that one , too, liznay cut, yes, we will not, but nevertheless it is a text. i think it was already recognized

in the russian translation. there, they have enough people who know the russian language perfectly and all these nuances are taken into account, we prefer the word allies. we don't use either. here is putin, too, and he hangs on the eve. your own article why don't you cite the case not to this day? the fact is that putin uses the word partner china in in this case, the word can be used in the article, uh, comrade, if i'm a moronic, for example, well, at least it's translated there, and eternal friendship, for example, such a wording, it doesn't bother you. no, i don't mind at all. i'm just pointing out some of the nuances. yes, that's all, i agree that we are fellow travelers in the construction of a new world order on the basis of eternal friendship to equip such a thing. i'm just what i 'll explain maxim. i'm not against you. you see, when i look at these reactions, that there you are , you are in favor of calmly parsing words. i don't

against, but we must understand exactly what the huge media company suits the west, and she comes here and many here begin to discuss. the hypothetical problem is whether russia will become, well, a vassal there or something else? here is china , and, uh, china is saying in the west, here it is, like , using russia, but at the same time they are saying that they are against the fact that the chinese of russia, uh, bring them together. well, how do you tie it all together? i don't know. i just mean that there is a huge enough amount. eh, well, such constructions language sense, which is used in order to torpedo normal relations, negotiations and normal perception of people, and this task is technical, it is technically set. and technically solved.

this is what i wanted to draw attention to, because, for example, in the nineties, when i traveled a lot to the far east, i was surprised to read here in moscow in the press about the fact that the chinese were seizing the far east . to vladivostok and i don’t see it , i talk to people and don’t see it, you understand, but in newspapers, they have long seized everything from us. well, if you pay attention to the images and gestures, then, of course, the visit of the e leaders of china to russia and his meeting with the president of the russian federation from the prime minister, but very strongly and widely discussed in ukraine, but naturally in ukraine it is discussed differently than in russia uh, i would put it mildly, uh, with tension somewhere with some kind of nervous strictness. why not a single nervous tension, because ukraine does not listen to the words of kyrgyzstan and the ukrainian authorities in ukraine.

understand? what slovakiairbi - it's not easy words. this is an order an order that we need to continue to fight, and today you showed the new president of the czech republic and said, yes, the new elected was recently elected. he talks a lot, he is very verbose pr. but what he said, he said exactly the same thing that the americans say. true , he clarified that in the ukraine of ukraine there may be the right to one for a single counteroffensive, the right is not the right, but the opportunities are ok thanks to the chance the opportunity for a single offensive. that's about this one counteroffensive. everyone says and in ukraine, they also say when there was a meeting in ukraine and a video meeting , which was attended by a representative, that is , confidentially van hmm, shallows and autumn from the american side, and from the ukrainian side , everyone who one way or another was present, but makes a decision in ukraine and will remove it

from the commander of the operational task force tavria, which is responsible for the crimea , the commander who is responsible for the war in bakhmut. well, and so on. yes, minister of defense. e commander-in-chief, then zelensky came, oh what they said and what the decision was made to the united states of america and how and what command did they give to ukraine, pavel, this president, he, as it were, translated into a simple human language ukraine has the only chance of an offensive. and as a citizen of ukraine , i have other concerns. and if ukraine uses this chance and loses, if the ukrainian armed forces loses in this battle, if ukraine loses, as a counter-offensive one or there, if there are many and the last one , these victims, which are possible, why are they are needed, who needs them, whether ukraine or still the united states of america who speak kirby's words even a hint is not just a change, even a hint is impossible. you see.

ukraine was encircled, strangled or bought? i don’t know how they made zelensky dizzy and it’s obvious that, as max says, there’s nowhere to go. here is your phrase. i will now take ukraine in this situation , there really is nowhere to go , you can only hope for a miracle or for some kind of solution among pin and putin. others, but you asked a very important question. so i think, i think, i'm just looking at all this. so you say what will happen after the failure. eh, contra us here, i am grateful to you for this question, because from my point of view, this is the key question, the most important, what will happen after the failure of the contrast in ukrainian. here and here it is necessary. uh, very seriously so to say, well, approach this issue. do you think zelensky will then rush to make peace or america to him? and

make peace. i think no no yes no they will say, you will not rush, he will have to fulfill his contract to the end , captured by the intimidated, and so on. here, and this means that they will slowly crawl away, destroying everything in their path , refused so that the territory that will be liberated by the russian federation will go to the most destroyed state. this is what the contract with america implies in the next step and exit from this contract. no, if only someone wants, the americans, someone wants to terminate this contract. they have to eliminate zelensky whore. this is the only way. this is what you need to think about in ukraine, and you need to think about this, because the rest of the alternative is that zelensky then sits down at the negotiating table and concludes, well, in fact. you contract as soon as in

other circumstances with other results that a year ago was. i can't imagine i can't imagine this option neither america nor zelensky if america changes its mind, then zelensky should be removed think about it, but i think zelensky like uh, after all, professional actors could play any role and if the question arises of changing him or changing the text of his role, he will change the text of his role, but it’s interesting now look before i have you in your specialty by the way, about european theme, and, uh, a doctor for life, he will pronounce with us. well, or unfortunately. how do you like it better. sash, well, that's interesting, yes, many paid attention to the ambassador more in france . this is an outstanding situation. let's take a look at it. no more france is needed builds up tension. this is russia that

attacked ukraine, this is russia that invaded the territory. this is russia that kills people and kidnaps ukrainian children. so , if today ukraine fails to defend its independence, the west will be forced to enter into this conflict anyway. well, therefore, that our core values ​​that were the basic foundation of our civilization of our culture will be in danger, so we have no choice today. well, interestingly, after this statement, it is also, as it were, new precedents in almaty first yes, the first who began to refute the embassy in france itself, that is, the embassy of greater france said that his message was correctly understood, and he did not say anything like that. after that , the polish ministry of foreign affairs got involved and said something about the context and uh, which, of course,

did not mean that they intended to join. after that, i listened to what he said in the original and then reported to you. here e so or not so, well were reported at once what? it's just not my turn to show up. he, of course, he unequivocally said, he is very slurred there , either he is hey or altyn e, far free, but this is precisely to enter into conflict here. thanks to your knowledge of french, i trust, so i directly said to join. i why is this? val is here with the scenario that i described vasily to me, he seems to be the most plausible and the second scenario that he describes. poland that while they will retreat and burn everything that the russians get. poland will have to go to that half, which will be whole and which the damage will take for itself. this is how i understand it statement. well, yes, but here now , speaking of this new sincerity, i wasn't

listening. uh, that's it, the speech was now listening to the polish ambassador, but from what i heard. uh, i thought he had french, i have french too. yes, not the first, but there is. and it seemed to me that the french polish ambassador was not the first french either, because he skipped english endings and, in extreme cases, he would say that the two languages ​​\u200b\u200bwere confused, but we ’ll see for diplomatic justifications for new sincerity, but the essence of the matter is that we already see a kind of tendency, when some tentative radical balls are thrown through words. what in traditional diplomacy? in general, it almost never happened, yes, the ambassador is still, well, in a good or not very good sense, such a ceremonial pompous figure, swaggering to uh, again, maybe in a good sense swaggering, who says correct speech. don't step over the flags, don't step over the boring small river, as a rule, eh? and now this one is starting to change, and this is starting to change. uh, american posts,

because there people, as it were, without diplomatic experience without diplomatic international education very often come and are the brightest. eh, let's go. yes, it 's just that american diplomacy is a separate inventive humanity, so i don't know. how many what quota i'm afraid to be killed. excuse me. well, we understand exactly what. well, this is a significant part of a quarter of some kind of corps of diplomats. these are those who showed up with a large contribution to the election campaign of one or the new president, that is, this is farm in general a purchase. uh, the honorary title of honorary public service rich people invest it is converted, then into the status with which they retire. and this is a large quota within the entire american diplomatic corps, or he himself advanced to the primaries and then withdrew. and uh, became

an ambassador became an ambassador. yes, especially the post-sent over there gives, but uh, why and that's what the ambassador began to say. uh, what they think to cut the truth of the uterus here, uh, the previous year showed us the notorious ukrainian message, yes, which lit it as best he could, a who went behind all the diplomatic flags, protocol flags, but nothing. in general, the germans endured the work for half a year, but in the end they began to supply weapons and it is possible that the poles also decided to throw a trial step through the ambassador. naturally. now they will say that they misunderstood him, that he did not mean it, and, nevertheless. not technology, when radical and seemingly unacceptable things are thrown through the ambassador, but it is becoming more and more, uh, popular. yes, i'm only the only thing you understand, here. eh, i think i said consciously, especially with those remarks that unambiguously enter. yeah well, uh war. i would just not overestimate the messenger, you know? here we

always like to mix. no, it’s a grotesque example, it’s caricatured, but here it is, wait, you can’t use it, because the decision that germany would go to supply tanks and guns was not connected with bad crazy boorish clownery. miller at all. that is, you understand, if the comrades americans had not given the order, melnik could have danced his crazy dances for a few more so to speak, years and nothing would have changed from this. so i found pointing out, you know? well, no, no, the entourage and the reason is true, but the last phrase, but people like melnik and like the polish ambassador now they think that by doing so they are changing public opinion, which will turn the americans in the right direction of a colleague. you have seeded a wonderful conversation. i ’ll join the professor, because i have just a wonderful story from switzerland, which the americans are now pressing just in terms of

the urgent production of a large number ammunition and supplies to ukraine, and so the ambassador of the united states of america in switzerland, e. scott miller is such, and speaking recently in the swiss parliament, he said such a beautiful thing is outdated. no , he said otherwise. he said that if we consider talking about it, then nato is such a donat around the edges. everything fatty is delicious. but the hole inside is switzerland, he said, too. but he said this, just now there is a hole for a little neutrality in this sense. neutrality meant, this name he had a double meaning. hole that there is a hole in nato, and this is switzerland , this is the weak link. well, in terms of neutrality, of course, too, so that in general they are not shy in their statements , and the fact that they have now started a number of such statements even makes me think that they are agreed - is it not discussed or is it such uh, the line, when let's go. each of us will crush with some kind

of statements, and then the experts at kulikov 's program will be tormented by thoughts about whether it was an accident or it was such an action that everyone discussed in advance, but now, returning all the same to the visit of syntheticin. it seems to me that a very subtle game on the part of russia, on the part of china, is not to designate and not use designations that could be used by the other side against china against russia, therefore, specific words have disappeared or there are no specific words. the union of specific words is some kind of association. uh, military assistance - this is specially for me personally. it's just that this is a specially defined definition that was simply removed from this important thing, it's not important. just to understand that the visit of a statesman for 3 days a three day visit in itself. this is already an event in which you can call it whatever you like or not call it at all, but it will be clear. what is it about. well, from what worries today. uh, germany don't touch europe, uh, everyone's favorite annulina ber god but this, of course, is the financial crisis in switzerland and

the purchase of hmm credit. it was in germany that they suddenly remembered how, when the last crisis was, germany was forced to immediately lay out 300 billion. not 50, there is not 200 billion, but 300 billion euros for the immediate purchase of those assets that had to be saved, then there were 200 billion, which actually made the background for greece, then there were also crazy funds. and now everyone is asking the question on the edge of what abyss? we stand because against the background, that is, galloping really galloping inflation. at least for food. inflation in germany, everyone understands that today's crisis, if it continues now, it will end in a completely different way. it will be a completely different way. and the thing will no longer be about helping ukraine, it will not be about where and what needs to be supplied, and it will be about how to save germany and how to save europe, and this is a very serious question, which, e. here he is today, you know, that sounds, well, shamefully so. well, yes. here it is,

but we don't know about it yet. tomorrow they will talk about it very loudly. yes, you know, an important thing, touched on none and also touched it. and this is directly related, by the way, to neutrality. e. well, that's what happened with credits. i've been watching this morning, when i realized what happened, i, frankly, stunned for one day, sunday. you have to imagine what e vikin is in switzerland, you all died out, not that no one will ever go anywhere for us, and so on. on sunday , they collected it in one day, and they gathered it. not only the officials of the departments that concern the state council, which actually is, well, the government yes, the ruling structure and decides that the shareholders are the legislative shareholders. you will not ask, goodbye shareholders of 17 billion invested in infrastructure obligations. uh, people, crossed out nafig, unprecedented help, what happened, well

, the second largest, the bank will now be one, by the way, no one talks about what's on the fields. nevermind. yes, but what happened is directly related to neutrality. i approve it, so yes, the beginning of their kakha when it began to sound publicly actively in the swiss press discussed one issue. let the way we arrested russian money from us go into chinese and arab money go very actively. 'cause no one wants to stay there, so that they too would be arrested after that. well, you can imagine that if well washed it all out of there, then it is clear that they have nothing to provide it with nothing. just here is the result. that's the price of neutrality. uh, there's an important event coming up. now in our country it is an inter-parliamentary conference russia africa international of 40 african

countries, and a representative of the head is participating there. uh, the chambers of our, uh, federal assembly participated in this. yes and here is putin's president, uh, also addressing this respected international assembly, listen this whole deal was served under the sauce that it was necessary to ensure the interest of african countries, by the way, i draw your attention to the fact that during the same time during this time, despite all the restrictions and restrictions on the export of russian grain from russia to africa , almost 12 million tons were sent. and here’s something else i would like to add, if we nevertheless decide not to extend this deal and after 60 days, then we are ready to recapture the news that was sent in the previous time to a particularly needy country in africa to deliver from russia to these countries free of charge. well, this line

which i said, yes, firstly, all the speculation is about 60 days. so the president told you, well, and the documents were shown. well, they are directed, which do not leave a double interpretation, and the struggle for africa in this sense continues on a full scale in full, yes, i haven’t spoken briefly yet. i just wanted africa. let's fight, well, firstly, and the fight really goes not for life, but to death and publications in the new york times. and plums, well, as always, we know plums in new york, but about the fact that supposedly russian some unnamed mercenaries are preparing to kill the president of chad and his three assistants. that is, there has never been such a thing, so that with a reference allegedly to intelligence there, the newspaper. this is how i tried between russia and

one of the american countries on this site, and the second is a unique example of how one of the ukrainian telegram channels works and disinformation. i mean on the eve of xi jinping's visit. uh, nine chinese were killed in russia in the central african republic and this is a big hello, putin is there ha ha ha, and russian pmcs are suspected of writing about this, leading french franz press agency, but fortunately they, as link added. i go in there first, but it's not a franz press. and the usa this press of the americans is all in english and there is a phrase what rebel groups did this or what, next? even the americans write someone there tried to accuse, while the russian pmcs did not provide any evidence. here is maxim so on

guard in the information war and in exposing fakes. thank you, of course, very funny. but to hear about something like that, when there are some notes in the media that, uh, well, they don’t trust in those countries to which these fakes have been directed for a long time with an attempt to drive them in. a wedge between us, china, us and africa , forgive us, but we are present on earth in africa if the africans want to turn against us, but this will not work, because it must be demonstrated on earth by some deeds there are no deeds. well, more precisely, they are, they were and everyone remembers the colonial period. well, here our french colleagues are clearly the same, they are not in the black. yes, not winning, but i still wanted to return, and briefly the statement of the polish ambassador, you know, but in this story i put myself in the place of such an educated pole, a polish layman who analyzes the situation. that's what i have to think , then, my country through the mouth of the ambassador, my country in france speaks of an attack not his defense,

but an attack we will join, that is, there is no question. to defend itself in this way, thereby excluding nato and the notorious fifth article in this context, that is, my country wants to get involved in the massacre now. uh, without any leverage from nato, like this, one on one with russia for whom for the ukrainians e relations across the field, how to the ukrainian there? well, it is known to everyone, but in this context it turns out from my country from poland they want to make ukraine 2:0. the poles need to think about this, because i think it was done exactly in this context. it’s unlikely that it took place, as some kind of whispering from washington, poland is playing its own independent game , which is very dangerous, primarily for poland itself , poland is really playing its own game, and there ukraine has long been in all internal surfaces, and therefore now the ruling parties, and in poland, she perfectly understands that the defeat in ukraine is a disaster for them and within poland itself, that is, they

are now trying to obscure this against this background, but the traditional processes that poland has fallen into are quite serious processes , but the energy crisis associated with the closure of enterprises, and so on and so forth, that is, about poland, until now, it is justified by the fact that we are participating in ukraine and we are participating in returning, in general, our territories under control, o which western ukraine is talking about, so everything is sold quite calmly, but inside poland, and now, this is when the ambassador of this country declares this, i would no longer talk about, which means how much they began to play new diplomacy. it's easy to understand that the pole set himself up, and he really stated what they are still talking about in poland in the kitchens or in the squares, and then a person came out who officially represents poland . you know, i agree with your point of view, especially after the translation by maxim , which additionally motivated me to do this . you literally have to obey, because

i understand it like this and understand, i always follow it, not even for the words pledges. the link and here the logical link is very definite, if ukraine cannot reproduce its independence, i say it in my own words, then we will join. yes, you see how interesting it is. now, when all this is brought to the brink of death, then we will come to save the alychans of volhynia, and maybe also zhytomyr. if so let's say we'll get there, even this is a threat to ukraine in fact. it is implemented simply not in military conditions. this is what vasily is discussing. why did i link this. and what, to be more precise, when the counterattack is covered with a copper basin, then poland will wait for the loss of independence and will join. that's what he said went so that the poles knew about it, how they would equip it. let's see this. you see, well,

this is already ours, and therefore, if we lose there, then we will climb there anyway. yes , of course, we will get advertising immediately after it sold. and where is the birthday woman in labor? it was a task to prevent you from spending your birthday at work new episodes today at 21:20 and friends a special issue is dedicated to mothers and grandmother on sunday at 17:30 on the russia channel what is behind this sign behind this sign real shirinskaya school and really interesting classes, where real fifth graders are passionate about their first discoveries of more than 14,000 points of growth in small towns and villages throughout russia, the national

education project is what is important here and now the right choice of millions of women. one tablet. two components in the morning. three actions protects the vessels reduces capillary capacity increases the tone of the tape. just like one two three. this is masha, she makes her first order on apteka.ru. this is a proven gypsum plaster, which is conveniently applied and easily leveled. fall in love with the new incredibly cheesy cheddar nachos king only at burger king and the cashback in the exonal big red package rushes to your rescue at the moment when the pain makes the wall climb dexanal

is charged against the more leader in the category. this hands of masha petrova they think that next spring they will introduce a new culture in a large player complex, and they think correctly, because masha is a professional graduate. we will teach you to think with your own hands, leading employers are waiting for our graduates who can both think and do professionalism. you in good company made you remember where is your card now with the button spb no matter pay for purchases not only conveniently through the system of fast payments without getting up from the couch. benefit has never been so convenient. pay for purchases using the button, st. petersburg for a partner and get withdrawals. missing new music. choose your tracks. listen to what

others will hear in a month. odnoklassniki represent hello, i'm sergey burunov i'm standing for a hobby, watch a new hobby show with odnoklassniki users only on the ok.ru website my hobbies, this is ok 1 woman in my life who confesses love, so it will be like in a fairy tale they lived for a long time happy leader.

on saturday at 13:05 on the channel russia ahead difficult way and no way back, rescued people a real example of patriotism. i am very

proud that we had such people , the person who can cope with this task to the depths of his soul, they touched the question, there is a cavalry. it's that, it's clearly somewhere sometimes even to tears, it was just getting married. hope from the film is very strong , a very cool picture should be seen by every righteous person. this is a program, who is against it on channel russia 1, but we continue our discussion. here it would seem, yes, we are talking about such abstract things. well, it is clear that the wording. here looking for, there is something building a new world order. and here it is folded like this stone on stone, brick brick. you see,

on the sly, how quite the world order is developing. here i will show you another fragment of the speech of the president of russia at the inter-parliamentary international forum russia africa and note that, uh, it was said. yes, and then immediately there in 40 minutes there will be a meeting with the chairman. that's somehow the themes are sure to intersect, listen africa is constantly increasing its weight and its role in world affairs. more and more confident declare themselves in politics and in the economy , they are convinced that africa will become one of the leaders in the emerging new multipolar world order. there are all objective prerequisites for this. african countries are striving to pursue an independent and sovereign foreign and domestic policy on their own to solve their difficult problems. russia and the countries of africa uphold

the norms of morality traditional for our peoples and social principles are opposed, imposed from the outside, not around the colonial ideology. by the way, many states adhere to similar positions. asia, the middle east and latin america and together we make up the world's majority i have already said more than once that our country is determined to continue to build with african friends. in the full sense of the word , a strategic partnership. key phrase we are the world's majority. i think this phrase will define the nearest a lot. that's just the phrase. when which i forgot at one time on your program the world's majority. it seems to me that she actually reflects the real state of affairs, in general, what concerns african

countries. i think they have been waiting for a very long time for everything that is happening right now before our eyes. here is the collapse of the soviet union and here is such a one. in general, the situation within russia itself. well, of course, we have weakened our interaction with african countries. and now it's getting better. i think we will reach a completely different level, but i still want to return to the issue of ukraine and to the words that you voiced here by the president of the czech republic yes , that ukraine will have only one attempt to counteroffensive. i think, firstly, he expressed not only his personal position. and this is the overall mood of the european political elite regarding the current situation that we are seeing today in ukraine, why i say this, because i want to remind you that about a month ago, many european politicians spoke about the situation in ukraine in such a way that they say, if ukraine does not demonstrate some success on the battlefield by autumn, then, uh, well,

they will be forced to reconsider their search paths solutions to this situation. that is, what i 'm talking about, i'm talking about the fact that in fact, the west, of course, is very powerfully preparing ukraine for this counteroffensive. if you want, it will be all-in. yes, that is, either you won or you lost with all the ensuing consequences, from military to political, including both in ukraine itself and in europe, including, i don’t think that this will greatly affect the states. they always, so to speak, wash their hands aside and find a way out of this situation. here's what concerns europeans. it seems to me that for them this can be a very serious political blow, at least for those political elites who got involved in this story and , to be honest, e is even against not more often even against their own, so to speak, economic and political interests, which in fact in fact , it seems to me that the interests of the states are dominant here, they are so much of europe. i would like

to respond to what was already said in the studio about the visit. e china leader china leader e you know i all the time, i like to follow what was said at the beginning and what is being said now , so you first had a special military operation, including in this studio, by the way, the professor of drums spoke about this. remember the old chinese told us about the komsomol members, which are all ambiguous. everything is ambiguous. we will also see how china will react. we do not know. there has been a lot of talk about how economically yes china er integrated the western system there by the united states. and that's all, really really. yes, definitely there. there is nothing like this big politics, but let's get away from those conversations. let's remember those conversations, how china will behave as far as it will support russia, and now let's move on to the current money when we talk about, if the state visit is the first

abroad. at the visit, everyone already recognized that this was certainly such a demonstration to the west. yes there and so on. and here we are now, as far as i will demonstrate. will it be announced almost a military union there? yes, no, of course, no military union will be announced. but the fact that china absolutely clearly yes maintains this line. and by the way, this is what was shown with africa. it seems to me that it is very important, of course, that china is now peacekeepers and the whole world, this majority of the world, is closely following what happened in the middle east from , by the way, china’s peace initiatives in ukraine, no matter how we are there, but don’t concern the details , but we said that we are ready to consider it. this could be the base for work and they see the reaction of the united states of america and the west to these peace initiatives, everyone sees everything and everyone draws their own conclusions professor. well, tell me, parry parries so e komsomo.

in general, they were strangled by the most non- democratic methods. well, we saw that thin then, you know, professor, let's still be professorial political science, i know, i know your extremism, but within the framework, uh, assumed by some experts within the political struggle in china and the clan, uh, which was called associated with ex with akak herself and who presumably, according to some experts. led the course of the zentau, not one of those people who were enrolled in this class suffered a complete defeat, and did not enter the standing committee of the politburo, but the scheme, but the age limits of restrictions in two terms. in general, it was also declared folklore, but almost semi-officially, so there is such an anti-komsomol coup yes, but uh, but one word, in fact, because. that's what oh, and

putin was just saying at the african parliamentary conference, and i had a very important connection here with his article, yes, which was published in parallel in china and there he said, uh, criticized this order based on the rules, but there it seems to me, for the first time i saw the addition that this order based on the rules in the interests of the golden billion of this direct link. uh, our official ideology has not yet been, and this is just an important context of china and in the russian chinese attitude. what can be the binding of a tile ? it’s very easy to find it, just ask , ideally, this division of labor, because we have something that the chinese don’t have, the chinese have something that they don’t have in russia, uh, russia in africa is used to being perceived as a guarantor of security since the days of the soviet union when well, just a brilliant operation of our military, when somalia attacked ethiopia in ethiopia absolutely non-existent ruins,

our army arrived there, flew in a few months, did it. so ethiopia won the war. since then, russia , the soviet union, russia has not been perceived this way, and we do not have that economic power. here is what beijing can afford and become sponsors for many african countries, and this cannot be, if we competently divide, and the sphere of responsibility, then it will be possible to have very, very good results here, and to collect both. this is the case of win win, these others win. now there has been information that the european union has decided to supply a million, and shells for ukraine so that ukraine does not lost or won. why can't they move on, er, to real military

assistance, when they will simply officially enter into hostilities and will participate in this. well, you know, this is not quite a good anecdote, when they ask the conclusion, you play a point, do not play, but it plays with me. that's exactly the same in the european union, they really want everyone really wants to participate in this. no one can get out of this, because the controls are very strict, but on the other hand. if right evaluate today's rhetoric of the leaders of the european union. you know, i have a feeling that after all they already understand that this is a world of screams. we will help. we will help, it is slowly fading away and are waiting for today's meeting, of course. they are waiting to understand, probably, but i 'll tell you honestly. i personally cannot understand and cannot forgive, as you wish, any words. here you can choose who makes them run, with their pants up in front of the locomotives. well, who do we know? no, no, you see , you can eat precedents , you can show it in words, temptation, well, agree to

in fact, be much more restrained not to demonstrate your psychiatric insanity. well, that's how you understand, but this is a very interesting question. why are they what made them behave like raspberries. now, well, i don't have an answer to that question yet. he 's kind of very fundamental, you know what we're seeing today. right today, before our eyes , there is no zelensky’s plan, there is a plan of the united states of america that is presented to the world as a kind of zelensky’s plan yes , we know, there are three points russia must get out of ukraine to return the border to ninety-first year and so on to pay reparations and so on. but there is a chinese plan, and these two plans, the united states of america and china will be discussed today or tomorrow , and not only between sidipin and mr. putin. in general, all over the world, you understand, that

is, these two plans. there are two two plans of two world leaders. yes china usa what to do in ukraine i, unfortunately for my own , have always been uh, against uh, alcohol opacha that there will definitely be a counteroffensive. i always thought that it would be avoidable countersteps and you can avoid tens or hundreds of thousands of deaths of deaths on both sides and really, but i still have some chance that if biden wants to call, sit pin, why does his friend now want to order it. maybe, i 'm sorry, maybe the biden is ripe for calling putin, uh, maybe the last, but why not you? i'll tell you biden to call with a child and will threaten on the one hand, and on the other hand try to bribe something. let it be putin and agree, because you are the constitution biden biden white house, urgent. call

putin signed vasily bakarov and send a telegram. i am literally two words. that's what colleagues said and what maxim said in relation to. this is up to russia and china , which can be from 100 for africa . indeed. i absolutely agree. and in my opinion. uh, this not only applies to africa, but also to asia, the same latin america as china that russia. they are not perceived by the peoples of the countries of africa, latin america , southeast asia, in general, asia is not perceived as colonial, they do not colonial past. i've heard. uh, some chairman of the youth wing participated in this forum. yes, there is an african union there, and he just said this in plain text, nothing, not russia, not china, have never been colonial countries. on the contrary, they always spoke from the position of help and progress there, and so on, matvienko voiced a proposal to seriously consider the reparations of the colonial powers in relation to

the oppressed countries. i want to respond to what sasha said why europeans do not enter into direct conflict, you know in that's the cynicism of european politicians, that the real line of their defense. it is located outside of ukraine, right there beyond the western border. that's where their real defense is. and as for ukraine itself, they just follow the fairway. american policy, the goal of which is aimed at containing russia, including through the active phase of hostilities , therefore, together with america, they are directly involved in this, but they certainly do not intend to fight directly with russia, especially on the territory of ukraine. of course, they do not intend to. yes, let me draw a line with the words of trump today just china russia iran north korea other countries of a less than friendly nature are busy dividing the world. while our once great us sits back and watches, we are not a wealthy nation with open borders, fake elections and a terrible inflationary economy. we no longer set the standard. the standard

sets us up our so-called leader does nothing but have aids and a curse word will not be spoken by the day program for today. everything is straight watch the program now and see you tomorrow. hello , the main thing for this hour. vladimir putin appealed to law enforcement officers that in no case should they work according to the principle. stop letting go, you need to help people rather, but solving a crime about the attempts of the west to rock society and the peculiarity of their work.