the next issue of federal news will be aired at 16:00. all the news is always available on the media platform, we look in the application or on the site look.ru we will see you all now. good afternoon. this is a program who is against on the russia 1 channel and in the studio dmitry kulikov is a journalist. seymour herge argues that even if chancellor scholz did not know in advance about the sabotage at nord stream, then since autumn he has been at least supported by the united states in concealing data about this incident, midritania reports that

the transfer of ammunition to ukraine with a joint uranium does not lead, they say, to a nuclear escalation of the conflict. well, british scientists have long proved the harmlessness of this kind of ammunition , they are lagging behind, they would still prove their usefulness, british scientists. the office of the secretary general, he said that the organization does not yet consider the peace process in ukraine possible, a rather strange statement for someone who should consider peacekeeping as his main goal and task. the formation of the russian chinese union creates a more serious problem for the west than the conflict in ukraine, said a former adviser to the us president on us security john bolton chairman dolphin's official state visit was very successful and fruitful, according

to both sides proof of this short conversation leaders moment of forgiveness, here 's a look now the change that was not over the table. there is an engine for these changes. please take care, dear friends. these are the words at the end of the whole meeting. i'm there, of course, there's a lot to talk about. you will talk about this today, including, of course, and well, i printed it out from the printer, and

i got 18 pages, only one statement about strategic cooperation in full in the new era, 18 pages and all the content there is no water at all, but this is forgiveness on the threshold of the kremlin palace. uh, very revealing and the words that the chairmen said there, we are in a process that hasn't changed in the last 100 years. and when we are together, we drive that change. i agree president putin said take care of yourself said have a nice trip president putin said here is a short short this scene. in my opinion. well, this is such an action that closed all 2 days of work and took off the meaning and meaning of everything that happened, you signed up first. come on, but it alarmed many, because i have several western colleagues. uh, rank say what do you

think about it, because everything else was. well, more or less predictably, a joint press conference. well, in general, the text also impressed you with the statement. uh, well, cooperation in the new age. well, starting from the fact that e remove nuclear weapons located abroad. all this is what it is so to speak, e is an interesting statement, to whom it is addressed to the run in the american laboratory , so modestly it was said, an order based on some rules is not acceptable for our countries. these are definitely quotes. well, and so on. there almost all 18 pages. well, more or less, yes, from this state, at least in honor of those concerned. people's problem we are talking about them precisely, because they seem to me, i will explain. why did i join? i'm sorry, you just said everything was more or less clear in 2 days, but here i am

i'll tell you my position. i understood that it was symbolic that in doing so, yes, it would consolidate china's self-determination, and it sounded symbolic and the leader said that hmm, this is a strategic choice , our cooperation is a strategic choice of the people's republic of china. well, i 'll tell you honestly. i thought so, well, this will happen symbolically, but in decisions and on paper. yes, much will remain behind the scenes. it didn't stay. that's what 's interesting, because in these 18 pages. if you read it, well, there is no sensation. because that roughly the same thing was being said by russian and chinese official representatives now, it was clearly printed on paper in the form of a large text of a joint e-e, and everything

seemed to be like this. e, predictably, exactly to this last phrase. and i don’t know what it is, to be honest, on the one hand, well , the last phrase is remembered, as stirlitz taught us. or maybe the show is on the other side. well, it's hard for me to imagine that they agree somehow. yes, that's what, let's say that on the sidelines, putin and xi agree. come on dear friend. you say this phrase. let them know this is something. well, sometimes it happens that something breaks to the surface, which, in principle, should remain behind the scenes. this is probably correct, but this phrase is about the fact that the most serious changes in 100 years. and uh, when we're together we have to move, 100 years, subtract. 100 years, that is, since 1923. sorry i thought world war ii was the rise of the people

's republic of china unipolar world. now is the perfect moment and there is no way out already, because, well, even the americans do not leave china a way out. yes, this is already clear. i read too far, as if the political context. he may be there, because the americans left no choice. but i was thinking about the historical, and i can say that this is after all, which means that all the problems of mankind that led us to the first world war remained unresolved. and the task is to overcome this problem. yes, all attempts to to overcome the problems that plunged humanity into this first world war, and the second was only the second act of this war. yes, but the one that was called

cold was the third, maximum. it's lasting, right? war? i spoke about this publicly, my point of view is that we are dealing with merging 100 years of war. and that's when the comrades said this. i thought, so to speak, that maybe, i was not so wrong and i was wrong in saying that this problem remained unresolved and the war has been going on for 100 years. well, this is my version of the historical is not political uh, 100 years, indeed, an important date 100 years ago , 1.125, the treaty of lausanne was signed, one of the treaties that ended the first world war, and there were many of them, and the washington system was formed between relations, it was western-centric. this is the first. the second was very much in it, and the sin associated with the definition of aggression, and so on , the third, and there a league was formed, yes, and subsequently, following the results of the second world war , the united nations organization was formed, these are, uh, all the facts are like once

proves that this age of the west is centric, after all, in fact. these two systems of international relations were western centric. they ended this western-centric international relations , a new chapter is coming. after all, it was said by the donor leader that a new chapter is coming in relations between foreign countries, but more than that , it can and should be stated that the visit of xi and communication with our president. this is the result. e. this is such a new chapter in the system of international relations, and the movement towards this very polycentrism, what we talked about in this studio more than once is, if you like, such a sentence to the hygiene of the united states of america because uh, this is a symbolic visit. and the leader of china made his first visit after being re-elected, and it is worth noting that relations are not being built against it. and for something, for the construction of this very new world, and they are not built against. yes, this is a relationship, for that is

a constructive partnership, and one more phrase is very important. e, which was said in our e by the president that the relations between russia and china - this is an example of how the world powers should interact. responsible world powers. this is what distinguishes us from countries. the west is responsible for the fate of the world and you know there was one moment. it is precisely the phrases, yes, the construction of phrases that also drew my attention to myself precisely in the dolphin, which echoes the phrases on the porch. here look at china's published position of china on the political settlement of the ukrainian crisis would like to emphasize that on the ukrainian settlement. we are steadily, guided by the settlements and the principles of the un charter we adhere to objectively and

impartial position actively contributes to the reconciliation and restoration of the coast-owners. our position is based on the very essence of the matter and the truth. we are always for peace and dialogue. firmly stands, perhaps, the history of the country. i count with president vladimir putin in various forms. for the benefit of the dynamic and long-term development of sino-russian relations, here is a phrase about the fact that you are on the right side of history due to the fact that it has been repeatedly used by the americans in

such an aftermath of the issue. it seems to me here totally not random in this place. yes, who is on the right side of history the chinese you chose he did and this is not a political choice, but a historical one directly correlates with what we discussed. uh, well, you kirgi, everything was explained. yes? let me now show you what he explained to you, so just about peace initiatives, and then you will say how they learned it in ukraine. i don't think it's fair to say that china is not biased in any way about ukraine, they didn't judge this invasion, they don't stopped buying russian oil and russian energy, representatives needed to keep an eye on moscow but never said that the president did not let ukraine in , did not bother to study ukrainian goals. and his regime keeps repeating, like

russian parrots the propaganda that this is some kind of war from the west against russia is some kind of existential threat to mr. putin is just empty talk. well, first of all, they came to insults. yes, well, that is, in china they continue to repeat, how parrots are kirby and the word mode. dima, it’s bad, so evaluative, this is it, which means that it broke , you understand something, something broke. but in general, to be honest, here i am, as a person who pays attention to logical absurdities, first of all, i also think that when logic does not fit, it means that there is obviously deception. that's why it's clear, just as he says it can't be unceasing, after all, he didn't condemn. so, if you have already condemned, then by definition you cannot be without partiality. you are already on a certain side and he does not even notice this logical nonsense, which

china accuses and puffs out its cheeks. well, what do you have, but with respect for the company. he's just an administration official, united states of america. i don't want to comment on his words. later i will say what this means for ukraine, this is a very bad signal for ukraine of the word kelbir. i would like to comment. e my point of view of what was said among themselves. what exactly did the emotionality of the components talk about, and mr. and vladimir putin, and especially you showed this part, which concerns the chinese leader's cd-singing statement on the peaceful settlement of conflicts in ukraine a. he also said that we published the political component yes , we published not just a person says he published it, we want to study this further, i hear the reaction of vladimir putin who said that china's peace plan is a different statement. it can be in part or in some part. i can agree with this to take it as a basis

, i won’t, uh, quote putin, but i understood it that way, yes, that russia yes, you can work on it and now ukraine in a second in that case you are you you are quoting in full. if you quote many parts of this plan, it can be taken as the basis for a peaceful settlement, if the west and ukraine are ready for this, which is not at all ready for this yet, the point is why it’s not ready, because yesterday, and now in ukraine there was a very fast short press conference yesterday zelensky and the prime minister's outfit. japan create a presidential issue. here comes china. that's how you first, did you call , did you call all these stumps? well, in general, what to do? if answered, no to me no one called, but, and now listen to listen we passed in different ways. well, my zelensky plan is 12 points for china to study, well, that’s all the point that i’m still up to how, and the expert

can tell you what, unfortunately for me, the position of ukraine today is no opposition, just kirby, because, no matter what president zelensky says, no matter what the minister of foreign affairs says, no matter what he says to yermak, then and so on, everyone listens to what the kirpis say. well, they went on like that. they are did they say what the kirgi said? but who is he, he did not fulfill a single point of our training manual. see what i will condemn there. here is zelensky kir, damn it, many guys, you can also here the leader of the european union, uh , one of whom we often quote, they all seem to know, but with one voice they said no, there are no proposals. not only will we not discuss china. serving china is a bad suggestion, it doesn't lead to peace and again because the cdp didn't tell russia to remove its troops. well, and so on you understand the same training manual, dmitry the fact is that today, for example, zelensky went to bakhmud today, for example, zelensky

went to the hospital, but at least zelensky himself posted these uh, his bakhmut trip on his telegram channel page , supported. uh, he presented awards to ukrainian servicemen, then he went, which means he went to the clinic. he posted all this within 10 minutes on his website. here. i'm telling you . how should an expert treat this? as an expert, i can trust that zelensky really went. what does that mean, does it matter? because if zelensky didn’t go, he didn’t go second. i went. i support my military service. i support the war, understand and doubt. you know what you're talking about. well, like you made such a contribution at all. you know, zelensky caught that, unfortunately, they didn’t hear the position of china, they heard you on something else. pay attention, they didn’t hear the whole world, they don’t hear another. and this is going to cost a lot. i

'm afraid of the world, this is where everything grows statements about uh, the supply of shells with uranium tips from here came from what, as was told by america, only ukraine itself will decide when i start copper negotiations. and when a woman yes, remember how many quotes you need to collect in general and there will be several dozen, where starting from president biden and all his officials and europeans. but it's all nonsense, it's all manipulation. wait here, look to tell. now the last 3 days will not tell the public in any case you can not start negotiations. so maybe this put here just compare two statements, if logically then the brain breaks the head breaks the whole head the whole mind, because here you come, they don’t break something, just as it doesn’t break so that it

doesn’t break. it must be turned off, not to think and listen and ask yourself questions. millions of people, just a second, and in this place the brain shutdown mechanism is a photograph from the bakhov there, yes, and they turn off the bridge. yes, it's still okay? well, you don't have to think about everything. what are we okay with. that's what it's for in this place times the switch and the brain turned off. well, you asked a question. i am compelled, but you e to describe it. sorry for the wordiness. yes, vasily said a very important thing. so that ukraine, after all, through zelensky, here is some kind of plan, after all, in a roundabout way, handed over to the chinese. this is very important, because , so to speak, being, as it were, a proxy of the west of ukraine, it transmits its plan. i am translating to china, so to speak, into russian, which means that there has never been such a situation in the world in history that the east was a mediator in great

diplomacy in resolving conflicts. and this that's just the fundamental thing, which, well , probably, really, well, changes the world, changes the world fundamentally and therefore bombs without their permission. well, russia is ready to discuss, and ukraine, in a roundabout way, passed them their proposals there. i will say right away that this peace plan is a miller initiative. china is not unfortunately not successful. another question is simple, because at different positions i would not make such assumptions here, it was zelensky who said what they conveyed in a roundabout way and if we are talking about a published twelve-point garbage, then why pass it on? she published. well, that is, what is meant, therefore , this is not a debate about this and i agree completely there, most likely, something that no one can ever fulfill, but both sides are not ready with the west. we are ready to discuss something potentially, without any guarantees of success

in the east. i think you are mistaken nothing as soon as zelensky rybnitsa is here, well, they will hang him right away, literally physically understand, the decision-making center in the economy and possibly in diplomacy leaves for the pacific region. yes , exactly, absolutely, but ukraine has a decision-making center nowhere. he did not leave , he is behind us, but they even dared to say here. yes, yes, here you are, our proposal to china, neither washington nor brussels, nor berlin nor paris, that in all conflicts of the last even several decades, europeans and americans are still mediated by such protrusions. you are discussing as if there is some kind of subject. well, even this is not a subject, he dared to send it to the wrong place. and where to they go there. alexei the lord is with you. uh, the americans approved these 12 points with their seal and said, these are good 12 points even, uh, two months ago. or maybe there is also why i

bomb so much, that no one asked them, in general , they don’t take into account how intermediaries are now . that is why intermediaries are not owners, of course this is what we are talking about. i have here, in principle, nothing. i'm just saying you know what's up. here, i’m watching what you’re looking at, and this is their unified position, of course, absolutely i am, well, i think that it’s not here either, docking. now we're done. i'm just showing you an interesting point. here, maybe this, but this moment is connected with your reasoning. there is such a unique piece, the former president of ukraine, uh, pan poroshenko, so yesterday he managed to complete the action that you alexey describe. yes, he ran yesterday to the chinese embassy, ​​yes, er, in kiev. so he talked there. and by the way, e wrote that even e, so e, the ambassador explained to him

beijing's vision of the so-called peaceful, the initiative made public on february 24 went to the dprk also informed about the first results visit, the leader of the people's republic of china to moscow, poroshenko did it. i don't know how this will turn out for him. here, there is a big one. eh, big question. here. finnish, mind you , didn’t do anything of this, although he could have made the minister of foreign affairs and someone else did this, which petya did. here. well, let's see what it does to him. go on. obviously both characters. not deeply subjective. i agree here. there is no contradiction here. we simply come to the same topic from different sides decision-making center from europe they always banked the west, they always said it would be so. and if not, let's discuss with me here. here he is leaving now. he is leaving somewhere for moscow in beijing, perhaps there will be some other decision-making points, but

this has never happened in history, well , in modern history, when it is really the west and the one who controls the economy of world trade. in the end, he pits those whom he wants to pit against each other. so he always made the final decision about the first world war ii. well, i i completely agree that this is one war of the first and second series. see, i will explain. yes , look everything is correct in what you say, besides the need to set equal prices, there is a camp, and one more thing, in which the united states has unconditional unquestioning. e authority according to various estimates. it has, uh, 40 plus countries, yes, in different koreans, so to speak. here in this camp there is no decision-making center, decisions do not move anywhere, but for 150 countries of the world it is a plus.

well, if we proceed from the fact that there are 200 of them, yes for 150 plus. eh, here. eh, really. oh this center. now, if you clarify it all like this, then it will be clear what you are talking about, then 40 plus there are another 10-15 countries and these 10-15 countries are already a gray zone, for example, the arab countries, in particular saudi arabia, are leaving this camp, who believed that the center at tam why she was leaving both politically and economically they are reducing their respect for the american national debt. they are actually today. well, or like this, in the medium term , she is ready to switch to trading her oil, such as yuan. if china is ready for it. by the way, this is a big question. and the second thing, uh, the most important thing for me sounded during these two days for the talks of xi jinping and, uh, vladimir putin, this is what, by the way, the chinese side said, uh, our yasov economic zone it is ready, what is called converge here with china's

one belt initiative, one road or the new silk road is actually a movement. it will last for several years, perhaps decades. this is the way to create macroeconomic zones with their macroeconomic currencies in these macrons. and this is just the movement to move away from the dollar and the movement. this will end in success. then, when the american debt market actually falls, unfortunately, not earlier, but by that moment the infrastructure needs to be prepared, and what, in fact , the leaders were talking about. uh, once again proves this thesis challenged by the americans. well , in general, the anglo-saxon always controls maritime trade by land north, south and west east. these two transport corridors are new the silk road and the north and south that vladimir putin spoke about, by the way, the other day at the congress of the rspp, this is the basis for the future of such an economic foundation under the new system. it consists of two things diplomacy economy. that's why speech has

more and strength at hand supplements. well, this is just an alternative to the oceans of none of these three ways to control the anglo-saxons. well, they happen, but i think the chances are less, but i'm very alarmed by the bolt. here, i always say, i always say that here is a very strange character radical well simple. how corner of the house? in this sense, he can always understand that when a bull shouts at something, he shouts directly sincerely, and the true interests of the united states, which everyone says that they don’t exist, they say, he’s idiots . we have them, that's why i'm screaming. look here. utivine we are fighting for the interests of america and the interests of ukraine we do. this is not like mercy or the achievement of some abstract philosophical goal. there are specific interests here that make

america act as a goal of its own self-defence, what it is actually doing through our friends in ukraine can ukraine win? i think it's very hard to see now. how ukraine can win. i am afraid that the goal of the white house and nato is that the situation has reached a dead end, when in fact there are no winners and losers in the war. this is obviously very detrimental to ukraine but devastating to the us as it tells our adversaries russia read china or anyone else that we did not have the resolve to defeat this aggression if we are not determined to win on the european continent what we will do when china takes a step against taiwan. i believe that security from america around the world is undermined by the inability or unwillingness to lead ukraine to a successful conclusion to the war.

this is bolton on the voice of america ukraine program, he is telling ukrainians this whole story, which in itself is extremely significant, so there is max a translation into ukrainian that you heard, well, well, yes, of course, uh, john bolton once again, showing its commitment to this domino's theory that if we give it back now, give it back in ukraine, then tomorrow the truth will sprinkle with taiwan. i don’t know who ’s next, because they usually have ukraine and yes , they don’t have any more horror stories, but it even seemed to me more significant, and bolton’s interview in dagetegraf. yes, here is also a british right-wing publication, where he stated that the very detention of russia and china that we are talking about today in the program, and it is an even more significant challenge for the united states than a special military operation. well it's me quoted in the initial program. yes, that's exactly what you were talking about. this, of course, is very revealing. that is, i want to continue the thought of maxim a. if the official reaction from the washington administration

, it probably did not arouse much interest. well, everyone, in general, expected that they would not, and would not express any sympathy for the chinese peace plan, e would somehow respond positively to the visit of the chinese leader to moscow, then the reaction from the opponents of the white house, it was indicative. yes, that is, firstly, biden's administration was once again criticized for the fact that, because of his policies , we are witnessing a rapprochement between russia and china, yes , that is, the two sides of the opponents of the united states , respectively, america, of course, will have to compete with them much more difficult together. than, for example separately. here. well, the statement. john bolton. here, too, fits into the general outline. that's obvious. that the national security strategy that was presented at the white house was hers last fall. well, what is called you can throw out the trash can? yes, because that if the theses that were voiced there , they do not work now. that is, what it was said about that you need to play on the contradictions between russia and china, you need to try. somehow pit the two sides against each other. in general, do not allow them to alliance well, now

we see that, in general, this whole policy will not go anywhere. she got stuck. and i think that in the short term , the very visit from denping to moscow will not affect relations between the united states and china in any way , simply because they are at a rather low point, and plus there is fundamental contradictions, because taiwan, which determine, in general, the vector of development of these relations. but uh, i think some attempts. still, now they will have a place to put pressure on china. well, in particular, yes. the most obvious thing that the united states can do is threaten with the same sanctions baton, for example, some chinese companies that will now plan large investments in the russian economy. there are opportunities again limited because many of these companies are so under sanctions for military campaigns, but nevertheless, attempts will, of course, be observed, but in the long term. i think that the main challenge now for the united states, not only for the biden administration as a whole, for the united states is to develop a new security strategy for us that takes into account exactly. the creation of such an alliance of russia, china and other eurasian countries, yes, you remember, you

last year several times in your style. and what will you say if china turns its back on russia three or four times there was such a minimum, you wondered. you are now satisfied. you there are no questions anymore, i have details, but until you do, well, in general, of course , as they say, the picture shows that vasil had more than one experience. here in this, well, yes, in this matter he will turn away or not. and it really stood there, especially at the beginning of a special military operation. eh, this was the question. uh, you know, i’m now my personal e, absolutely yes my my e feelings, and what i paid attention to, i e me e, hmm, not exactly what struck me, but i really paid attention to the words that the stump said the day before at first meeting. remember, he was talking about telling putin that you have elections next year. i'm very important there and so on. i hope that the russian people

will support you, first of all, this . he said take care of yourself dear friend he said to putin addressing him. well, about these 100 years, in my opinion. so, when we talk about how important it is for russia, how china behaves, so for china, it seems to me that these two phrases showed that how important it is to china, how a hundred pounds will behave in russia. yes, this is the word, right? take care of yourself, dear friend , you understand, these are the words of the president of the country, on which a lot depends. e in the future of china, because china understands what it will face in er, in the very near future, and it is very important for it to remember that the minister is already a former foreign minister, china said that russia and china will stand back to back. that's how it was the image and so, china is very important who will stand back to back. and not will it fly into this back? something not friendly

here, uh, in my opinion, this, uh, visit, he was also this to china, which very closely followed this year with a special military operation, like uh. russia will go through the economic and political internal. yes , internally it was very important to make sure that russia is stable in all these respects, both military and political and economic, and in my opinion. eh, just here is another very important result. here is e of this visit. i think i was about to say exactly this. it's just that there is a redistribution, uh, and it's fair to say so, because it was your turn to speak. well, you know, they often like to play this thing, especially opponents play and throw it into our audience. well, russia can't do anything without china. that's why russia will have to be somewhere there, which means china and so on. uh, but i don't want to discuss all this. here is a year of confrontation at all with nato and 40 plus countries

shows what russia can do. and what a year cannot do - this is already when conclusions can be drawn. yes, uh, with neutrality, so to speak, and such. well, hmm correct so to speak, yes, support there is from the side of the same china, of course, but it is not absolute. she is not of an absolute nature, she did not wear it until she wore it. so this is shown for the year. and there is another question. i think that china knows this, and chinese academic managers. uh, the nomenclature, the party, they can calculate very quickly. and what would happen to china what will happen to china if the western world leads to similar sanctions against china and this is a question for a computer game and a lot of mental analysis. and i think that china claims russia needs more than russia

and china, and russia, so to speak, on the contrary, senselessness, uniqueness of positioning, how, by the way, do documents spell out a comprehensive strategic partnership that cannot be compared with all the unions of the 20th century? because it is much more than these unions. well , everything is not directed against third countries, but only in order to understand this. we must carefully look at all the circumstances. we are equally important to each other, equally important, this is quite obvious now this meeting is this showed. it's simple, well, with such letters i wrote about the fact that we are equally important to each other, exactly immediately equally important to each other, and russia and china need each other today as part of building this most fair world order, the mistake of the united states a was that that they allowed

a strategic calculation on instead of attracting russia, which was ready for this in the nineties, they did everything to push russia away from themselves, respectively, uh, in a natural way. uh, russia always deployed towards the west and towards the east, but first of all should be concentrated on ourselves, we started. just work on yourself and work with countries, and the east, which is not accepted today. these are the most non-colonial approaches. after all, there are a lot of events taking place in moscow in general in general in russia that are not related to the west. yes, this is it, uh, african, which passes. yes. uh, it's uh a meeting with denpin. this is all for a reason, the non -western world is tired of the steady dominance of the west, and russia is playing in this regard constructive role in the formation. this is the newest polycentric world. here's my replica literally. you know how it is for me as a citizen of ukraine and if

equal relations e china from russia and russia can china allow russia to lose on the battlefield? after all, the americans say that once again, can china, if russia lost on the field, be afraid that we cannot allow you to lose on the battlefield, but now, in connection with new realities, this is possible, and where can it lead? i just want to say what did you say, uh, there, and what happened 100 years ago. i'm just now beginning to understand that 100 years ago, about 100 years ago, ukraine began to form as an independent state of the ussr as part of the ussr. i would not want these 100 years to start with the fact that ukraine simply will disappear will disappear from the map of the world, as such, you know, i think you have now given birth to an incredibly deep thought. you see what's the matter, the whole phenomenon of european nationalism has outgrown nazism.

it was a rephenomenon of the first world war and it generated by this war of the first world war, that's why what you just said is a very deep thought. you may not like her. but if the end comes to the ukrainian nationalism created within the first world war, how is it a sin of this war? that question questions in ukraine but it is serious. we were very fond of at one time, and now they like to talk about how great it would be. if the possibilities that our country has could be added to those that germany and that's how it would be yes, everything is fine and wonderful on this european continent. that is why, for some reason, in an argument about the fact that and

how good it would be to combine our capabilities, our wealth, and those opportunities that china somehow had all the time. well, if the arguments were going on, but somehow on the second they kept saying, no, no, china is too integrated into the western economy. he has too many interests there and so on. and now when we see, uh, and about china, the main thing is, after all, okay, we see china, it’s obvious that europe is there, like, uh, important economic partners. yes, there, er, with whom china worked, and on which he earns, he sees that literally overnight he can be cut off from these markets and from this one, moreover. doesn't have the right to vote here, yes, so uh, in my opinion. here it is also necessary to rebuild your consciousness in some way. you somehow reacted to the bolton on ukrainian television, because everything came together for me at that moment, when i read the translation into russian, i shuddered at one moment when suddenly the phrase of the bolton was translated and this policy drives the situation into a dead corner, a deaf. the corner is the same ukrainianism,

which i don’t hate, which entered the russian language as into politics, but, but we are not russian people who do not have a return. we do not understand, deaf deaf corner. we have. and then i realized that it was, well, now i was translating, someone who knows the ukrainian language really. here is this subtlety not mastered. as for the talker, we paid attention to the first phrase, we are fighting in ukraine, yes clearly. yes, and anna lena, firstly, after he let it slip once she had to uh, fucking back. it won't. yes, no, the last one. pay attention after all, uh, the hawkish radicals from the republican party, and in no way more dangerous than the democrats, because he criticizes the current administration that it is driving the situation into a dead end, which is not a dead end because not very actively helping ukraine, that is. if he were in power, they would help more actively, and now

four e-senators and congressmen representing this wing of the republican party demand that the new systems long-range weapons to ukraine, uh, delivered all the same. i hope that in the end the line of paratroopers and trump, more cautiously, will take up, but this is not guaranteed . republican more than 6 very illegitimately stood up for trump. he says, i don’t know this woman who is attracted there. i’m close to the text, the words there are approximately the same as who says this, a prostitute is not well, what the judge works for foros says, i know for sure i liked this construction, it can enter any film. i believe that the author is now gathered there, so to speak pulp fiction film tarantino's tenth film, so, in principle, tarantino can take this phrase in his new film. it's

gorgeous. you sanka just gave birth to a meme. we will now break for advertising immediately after it will continue. since that trip and the chairs have returned. i don’t recognize you, as if alien for the polar waltz premiered from march 27 at 21:20 bird and friends, special releases are dedicated to mothers on sunday 17:30 on the russia channel, the vtb team will offer a solution. open an investment with a maximum return of up to 9.5% on the bank division right now. the brightest dirty shades we dance up with a flame i am the star nailya red not only

outside, but also inside all day on my feet and my back gets tired and i lead a sedentary lifestyle on a controversial daily basis. but how to protect your joints, thanks to a special halogen triple helix shape, artyom promotes support. joint health. artem just one capsule a day to protect the joints and spine. running is the source of my energy when it's cold outside, everyone wants to keep the house warm. i like that you can control the greenhouse from your phone energy-saving heater has a high efficiency and burns out oxygen and is absolutely

fireproof ; , which is conveniently applied and easily leveled new stickers. collect the entire collection only in magnit and don't miss dumplings, spoons and perky beef 1790 solution for every day vtb payments online is to make the house comfortable in one step and without commission make the day more fun with the payment of the internet and tv and without overpayment will make any evening cozy. in one click get a free card for life on vtb dot ru and every day will become better. go to bb and you'll be fine. forgive youth if you miss new music, including exclusives music meeting place with new music, 4. 30 years old are sure that

you buy osago at a bargain price on sravniy you will find it cheaper. get osago to save on the number one service in russia if insurance, then be sure to compare on the site and in the application, where are my children in the subscription days for free.

time to suffer, yes, this is my husband, your son has been in debt for two months already. money should be returned. ivan died. so you have to give a candy for a long time, take it, you'll see. hope at 21:00 on the channel, russia under these melodies, the stars fell in love, got married, celebrated the birthdays of children, each song is a personal story, genuine feelings, my melody

of a show that opens up new emotions of emotion. recall everything at 21:30 on russia channel excuse me, comrades partisans can we stay with you, we can’t return home , they will kill us there, i really touched you to the core , i wish you no, husband, the groom does not touch. everything is literal. every frame touches the soul. touching story this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1

, we continue our discussion yesterday. at first i told about it in the program. here, we were probably among the first, because the news had just appeared for the minister. defense of great britain about these shells. so with the accused uranium they will deliver, well, because the news is really defiant. yes, everyone remembers that this is a long story around uh, and yugoslavia and then iraq uh, numerous public organizations and medical organizations. all this means research. uh, most of them have come to the conclusion that it has consequences. there is a separate case in italy and in greece because it is on the border with yugoslavia and so on throughout this. here is the president of russia right at the press conference. rather. she 's talking in a speech in front of a sucker e. in in the presence of the chairman, uh si said that

this is the next escalation step that we will have to respond to. after that , the minister of foreign affairs and the minister of defense said about this that it would not just happen like that. sergey lavrov has returned to this issue once again today. this is a step towards a further buildup of escalation, and a serious buildup of a qualitative buildup of escalation, er, a statement by some western representatives that there is nothing to worry about. eh, nothing is forbidden. e from the category. uh, munitions with combined uranium we do not violate any conventions, but, uh, they still remember, what are the results of the use of ammunition with combined uranium, but led to yugoslavia in iraq when tens of thousands of civilians. yes, and actually

nato military personnel who used these ammunition for themselves with injected uranium e, suffered, and there was a sharp surge, oncological yes, and other dangerous diseases, the soil was contaminated for a decade. by the way, to the question that the west, a , bakes to increase agricultural production in ukraine and e. exports of ukrainian grain, a developing country, including to africa, the use of ammunition with combined uranium will sharply reduce. and if at all it retains the ability of ukraine e, to produce high-quality non -contaminated food, as for our reaction, of course, we will take this into account in our actions. we have, uh, adherence to international norms. ah, the introduction of war. we have our own military

doctrine. and uh, as the president said, as the minister of defense said, we will have to take into account. and what about this escalation. e our british colleagues, but take it to a new very serious level. here it would seem that the deputy minister of defense said, it is there, answering a question in parliament. well, you could take it. well, after all, the deputy minister is in the conversation. yes, and hush no today. what lavrov is talking about today , the british foreign minister said we will supply, we will supply, we will not violate anything, we will definitely supply, moreover, significantly television. this something is accompanied by the fact that british scientists are famous. meme already at least for the british. and yes, and for the bbc proved that nothing is harmful no. here's how they haven't proven that it's useful at all. i'm surprised right. well, i think, in fact, the use

of uh, projectiles with combined uranium on the territory of ukraine, in accordance with the conclusions of british scientists , does not pose any threat to the british population, because these projectiles will be used on the territory of europe in the center of europe on the territory of ukraine. you know, the intention of the british to supply such shells is not so much embarrassing. how much readiness of ukraine to use these shells do you understand and in general, in relation to those units in the ukrainian army that agree to the use of these shells, but everyone will just need to be held criminally liable, how much you need to dislike neither your country nor your people in order to allow third countries to use shells on the territory of their country, which pose a direct threat, including the corresponding consequences for the population of ukraine . as a basis, but putin also said, but unfortunately, but unfortunately, neither the americans nor

kiev are ready. yes, these negotiations and, uh, zapa- insists that xi still talk to zelensky, i'm not me. so i am convinced that everyone will definitely talk to zelensky, because, firstly, he positions himself as the last one and he will behave accordingly. he will talk with zelensky, but i have a question about the sincerity of the intention of the west itself , if they so wanted ukraine and zelensky to be heard by the leader of china, why are they from india they dragged the prime minister of japan to ukraine from india they dragged the japanese prime minister to ukraine on the day of the visit of esi, na na to the russian federation , they dragged it in defiance p- they dragged it with the understanding that after all, dialogue will take place so that there is no decision, because the decision should be made only by them personally. i am all about the fact that shells with combined uranium can be supplied. it plunges me, of course, into horror,

because i remember the nineties, when donetsk hosted, and the guys who suffered after the chernobyl disaster, and i know how scary it is. i saw these children who are like blood with milk. they looked there literally as a bed being lifted into a hospital. here was a boy and he, in general, he died of radiation sickness. but i would like to say something else, because if i don’t say it now, then this topic will go away, and the topic is very important yesterday, march 21, was world poetry day, and we are with you, but we are observing that, and we have already a little more even than in a year they regain their place, and in society their place in the cultural life of russia is very important, because the poets are connected with their audience, the poets gather the halls of the stadium and this process is moving forward, and i wanted to say that about the event that took place in leninka. and it was such a reference, if you remember to the polytechnic university, yes, when yevtushenko spoke, when akhmadullina was there, it was march 18. and after the event

, a guy approached me, and i won’t name his name now, because this is such secret information . he is a scout. he works in the donbass, he is from moscow, but he has been uh 6 months already is in the donbass, he came up to me and said, we are fighting there, but the victory, our final one, will be. here on the front that you're fighting on, on the cultural front, and we need to win. and so that this victory is ours and one more small moment. and since the idea of ​​poetry. i can’t help but read a very short text, but listen to my dear friend vlad rusanov, guys, this is an important text. a poet in russia is still a poet, but they haven’t gone around in art as before, he will be a lyre of feelings, and these feelings give people are a light poet, should not rush a lieutenant colonel to shout. hooray, get involved in the first fight. he is here in the ranks of the overcoat, having gathered in

a roll among people with the same bag, but if the lead rain is pressed to the ground by the poet, without humiliating himself to the poster, he will quietly say, your mother, the guys and the platoon will step after him. under a machine gun here, but no, it's wonderful about poetry. i already understand how difficult it is then to discuss something. i, well, i draw your attention to this. you create complexity for the leader and the whole team, because what to discuss just wonderful joints. something very difficult, but really, uh, going back to the subject of these projectiles with combined uranium. uh, what 's curious, but the statements of the british foreign office, and they do not even try, but to refute the fact that this will really affect. they say that, well, the probability is not very high and the impact

will not be very high on people on the environment. but, apparently, it will be somehow, that is, it leaves room for itself in the future to respond to any criticism. but how is it it turned out that the damage to the environment and certainly damage to people. here, of course, there are a variety of assessments, how will this all affect, but here is one assessment, for example, from iraq half-jah, where they used just these same shells with the combined rad as a result , after the end of hostilities, and the increase in cancer cases in children under 14 it was twelve, a multiple, that is, it was very high. here, of course, this is one case, probably, in different countries there may be different indicators here. i think a person depends also from uh genotype and so on, but nevertheless, growth is likely to be, so this, unfortunately, is a very serious stage towards escalation. but at the same time, yes, uh, in my opinion, but the decision is not to use such shells. it still does not say that with conventional shells everything is not so good anymore. yes, we already hear a lot. of course, we hear the statement that

the west often has allegedly shell hunger, allegedly rocket hunger. well, probably still some exaggeration of reality, but nevertheless, nevertheless, certain projectile it’s not in vain that even the british ministry of defense declares that they only have enough ammunition for a day of e maintenance. uh, well, active hostilities in the spirit of ukrainian. therefore, i think that this is not only an escalation, but also cruel to me in this story with the united. one thing is not clear in the correct one with shells, why did the british publicly state this at all, because it is known that they also confirmed and well, confirmed. this is already their journalists are asking. here is the first time why they said, but they would quietly supply indeed , these shells are used in all conflicts. you see, because the irritant is this phrase about iran, because it’s scary, but i agree with a smiley face that there are different assessments of how catastrophic the consequences are for the environment for health, including we have different ones here read on the russian website in global politics in the telegram channel there is a point of view that in

general, well, it's not all that uh, deadly and scary. and even vice versa. it can be said here as a consolation that these are not some super-efficient shells, this is less effective than tungsten, which are used more actively. but where tungsten is not allowed, then they use it with a united murat, but why didn’t they keep silent why did they decide to blow up the situation in the information field right now i have no answer, but think about it, what for i think that they didn’t think about what to blow up they continue to inspire ukraine in this way, by the way, there are many opinions and one should never be guided by opinion. here you need to try to build some kind of knowledge. but the only thing i know is that uranium. e with an ural core charge is an order of magnitude cheaper than with tungsten, and russia mainly uses tungsten cores. we have it all. but the civilized west, in order to save money, tungsten cores

they do not use more expensive ones, but use uranium ones, because they are cheaper, but will they be uranium dust in the lungs of people in children. it doesn't really bother them. that's right, yes, but i'm not a military expert. i know that we have something to answer. here, probably the military will say better uh, that's another matter. well, i 'll just support the idea of ​​​​cultural confrontation, because on this front and on the informational one, if we speak more broadly, well, what's wrong with us? as they say, it would be necessary to catch up, and even such statements by the british. i think that this is an increase in stakes, because in the information game they, in principle, as they say, learned long ago. in this sense, we also need, as they say , keep up. i would now show the wind rose in the uk on the central channels. well , it's just that i'm not hinting at anything, but just show, we also know where it blows you are creative, and then you think, and then think in my face you will not meet here who will support this yes, in such korea i do not propose to do it yet. that's because this game can be played together, if they

enter like that, then, of course, it only means that they are trying to scare scare. they're not bad, but we're not afraid, let's connect. if you already know how to play, i would suggest that all citizens of the russian federation located in the uk, uh, leave from there at least 100% why do we need us here is the information we are discussing the statement of britain, but just the other day, uh, japan announced that these are the waters they have that they used to cool the reactor. yes, the ocean is also nothing to worry about. listen, well, some kind of water there, why wouldn’t they demolish it, and how it’s in unison you know, here england declares that something is connected with the atom or uranium here satanov is connected. why do we have , in general, and not only in ukraine, but in general , people are preparing us for the fact that the use of nuclear weapons once was not at all deadly. this, in principle, maybe not so dangerous and not that you know

humanity will perish. and suddenly there is everything human perishes. and suddenly part of humanity died. it seems to me that this is max’s stuffing of information precisely for the fact that they are preparing us, because a nuclear war is quite, quite true, perhaps, and in principle, well, there is nothing so terrible. well, this point of view has the right to life , uh, because look, it was interesting, yes, they didn’t use it before, and now there is some kind of transition point where you need to not just start use, and also declare that we use it. that's it, well, this is the british escalation point. the whole situation , but i think they just seem to want to maintain some kind of leadership that mr. johnson has been telling us about for so long. yes , he always wanted to be number one. here britain first bet something did it, but notice every time they came out and raised the stakes, but when

it came down to it somehow here 's britain's participation in this whole thing, it was secondary. i just looked at the data. how many financial resources did the americans allocate to support ukraine, how much did the europeans allocate? and how many brits? well, somehow the british are not particularly eager to become leaders there, that is, they initially behaved like provocateurs and continue to do the same , provoking a conflict in europe. they are no longer. they don't consider themselves a part at all. e of the european union would be why not, but if there is ukraine ready to conduct these military operations, so to speak, continue. well why don't heat up don't escalate the situation, i don't i know how they always acted for that he went there most of all, well, he went. best of all and, probably, earned the most interesting moment. i just noticed it today. uh, that means no reduction in inflation. in britain, there is no talk in february of more than 10 percent. inflation. annual growth

continues you have it. it is mainly in the field of food products, what to do with this in britain is confusion, they do not know, probably, to supply shells with an assembled tip, maybe it will help today. i have everything right now, watch the news program and see you tomorrow. in studio yevgeniy rozhkov hello the most important thing by this hour arrived somewhere hit, something is on fire in donetsk the building of the water utility and the school were damaged.