who does not look like everything ilya filippov viktor vinogradov vladimir averin alexei karpukhin elena lead? all news is always available on the media platform let's watch and by this time everything was with you denis remember ovnov see you. good afternoon. this is a program of who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio of dmitry kulikov , criminal charges against donald trump will be brought next tuesday. a grandiose political show with elements of a criminal is expected. it’s hard to say who

will benefit more from him, trump himself or his opponents, as if on cue. europeans cared about relationships. with china today. there is the prime minister of spain following. behind him. french president macron is expected to arrive next week , along with ursula fondyrlein next to them and the minister of foreign affairs. japan is going with chinese counterparts. met everyone who wants to demand that china change its position towards russia will scare european markets up the trees. china is unlikely to agree to this and so on the economic war of europe ponies from china will become a reality obviously that the united states will try not to directly enter into this war, at least until the complete depletion of japan's european forces, it is clear that the situation in the world is over, tense and a turning point in the value

of true sovereignty has increased many times . president lukashenko spoke about this in his message to the belarusian people and the national assembly in particular, he said to ukraine. considering the extreme security threat, the russian federation was forced to take extraordinary measures, including crimea noticeably in russia. remember without firing a shot what's there happened and why didn’t the ukrainians then heroically defend their native land? the future will have to figure it out. the events in the east of ukraine became a continuation of the policy of destroying everything russian and the ideology of fascism already fascism is turning into the practice of killing those who disagree and setting fire to the flames

that the people of odessa were burning, remember. the extermination of the russian population, provocations against russia and its leadership forced the president of the russian federation to take measures to protect the russian people. well, this is a fragment from a rather long part speech, which describes the entire background of events, including current events, but after that, alexander grigorievich made an important proposal. i'll try to take the risk . stop fighting. yes, many now, especially in russia, can say, well, we already stopped, and then in the donbass, another moment, another moment, a different situation, and taking into account those conditions , it will be necessary to stop hostilities, a truce should be declared without the right to move the regrouping of troops on

both sides without the right to transfer weapons and ammunition by the manpower of technology, everything is dead froze. and if the west once again tries to use the pause in hostilities somehow. to strengthen their positions, again by deception. it was russia that was obliged to use the full power of the military-industrial complex and the army to prevent the escalation of the conflict. well , such a proposal would have been voiced by e natural during the daily briefing. and in the presence of presidential secretary dmitry sergeevich peskov, of course, he was asked the question at the same time. e with the memory of the initiative. eh, chinese. well, in particular, what dmitry sergeevich has already said. i have all the information i will lay out the package according to this context, and then we will begin to discuss.

in the context of ukraine, nothing changes, a special military operation continues, since this is today the only means of achieving the goals that our country faces , the president of russia himself said that he discussed the plan and its separate position, but we hardly think it is appropriate to compare these two sets of ideas. i mean, the one that was voiced by the si chairmen and the one about which he spoke. now president lukashenko they are not realized at the moment in connection with her desire. more precisely, the impossibility of the ukrainian side to disobey their curators of their commanders, these commanders. as you know , they are not sitting in kiev and insist that the war continue dot dot in several exiles of this punctuation mark about lukashenka's speech, he must be carefully listened to and read between the lines. well, in fact, he offers.

freeze hostilities, but it's hard for me to imagine that without first agreeing with the kremlin. he would have voiced this initiative to peskov if also it is understandable to listen and read here carefully, not implemented on an initiative basis, but why not because we do not want to, but because the west will not allow ukraine to do this . there was another such tough tough one about the use of all types of weapons by russia. he said that there is both phosphorus and united uranus and an enriched wound. he understands the thesis that we have sounded. i just have to abbreviate no illustrated. what do you mean answer with all your might? yes, figuratively, as is typical of alexander grigorievich, simply, but sometimes such images are doubly intelligible. that is, what putin cannot say, well, simply because of his temperament. i keep the prototype, because

i have singled out another moment here. why this proposal was made, because the next level is really next. we have been discussing this a lot, e. here you go. e, lukashenka, for example, said that tactical nuclear weapons on the territory of belarus are not the end. it will be necessary putin and i will decide and we will bring here, if necessary, strategic weapons, and they must understand this. the scoundrels there abroad, who today are trying to blow us up from the inside. and from the outside we will stop at nothing, defending our countries, our states and our peoples. there good and evil investigator can be asked. i'm not really arguing with you. simply, well, how would the hypotheses of the division of labor harmonization, we

do not know anything. yes, it’s not that we don’t know anything, yes, maxim thinks so. yes, maxim thinks so, and it is not by chance that lukashenka issued another warning. but repeatedly in recent weeks and months. we heard from western leaders that the goal is to defeat russia. lukashenka said that russia could not be defeated by nuclear weapons in this case either. i'm just quoting verbatim here, i don't remember. and as he said, well , in fact, if these are the cases, yes, if russia faces the threat of its own destruction and disintegration, then it will use nuclear weapons. it was spoken in plain text. this is how we say it, well, semi -hinted officials. this is what they say only u in tv studios some experts. but lukashenka said this out loud, but this is a reason

to think, because you are doing some kind of alternative, e.g., to victory over russia . but then you either accept such a result. this is this version of lukashenka voiced it. he is an ally of moscow, maybe moscow does not mind , can he try? yes, you know , i noticed that all people or politicians of the highest level who are trying to find a solution to this conflict no longer return to 2014 anyway. here whether we like it or not, we are returning to 2014 anyway. why because we absolutely objectively give the cause and effect of what happened she tells you? no , let's put it aside, let's sit down and agree on something, that means february is over, it's already been thrown aside. some say no. well, it's pragmatic. others aren't. wait until we answer the question, what was it? we will not give this objective assessment. we can talk about anything. uh, let's say

now agree on uh, a truce and everything else i can understand, let's say. uh, interest in a truce, let's say that one is trying. well, no, it would not even be correct to reconcile. the caution with which zelensky speaks about the counteroffensive, but why is he doing this? because on the one hand, the west seems to be pushing it. here is your weapon. let's step on. give the result they and he and kuleba are somehow trying from this counteroffensive. well, brush it off. why is this happening very big risks very big risks and uh, it's connected, there are three scenarios. yes optimistic pessimistic and realistic. well, it’s optimistic and understandable there, almost pessimistic too. it’s clear with all the consequences for zelensky’s government. and what a realistic scenario it will be, we don’t understand, we don’t know, because we really have his alignment of forces , technical capabilities, and so on. we don't know how. how

this will end for zelensky is a very big risk. i'll just remind you. in fact, we are, of course, somehow unpleasant to talk about this, but ukraine is seriously preparing for an election campaign for parliamentary elections. and in the event of a defeat as a result of this counter-offensive, there will be very serious consequences for the zelensky regime . he is very much afraid of this, hence the demands that are impossible on the one hand. give f-16. we don't have enough tanks. give us this. give me this, he demonstrates all the time, no matter how ready ukraine is for a counteroffensive as a result of the failure to fulfill certain obligations on the part of the west a. e. in fact, well, with respect to lukashenka, listen, well, they froze the conflict well. and what will be the political process will be, zelensky forbade himself to conduct the negotiation process, negotiations cannot be frozen. why because

absolutely clearly expressed any attempt. uh, approve the current status quo- it's in russia's interests to reject the plan from here. china from here, in general. that's just not the desire, in principle, to go. from a military scenario to some kind of political and diplomatic one. well, there is no such desire in the west, because the initiative, well, fine, but it is absolutely not realizable. it's hard to disagree with the sand here. but if i would start from the inside of the moment, since the process of pressure of the ukrainian authorities on e, dhoniks on the leaders and, in general, on the seizure of the kiev-pechersk lavra continues. e processes, but not stopped, there is a government decision to abolish, just to what you say, do you have this podoliak? yes, he said words for which, in principle, well, if at least some norms of civilization and rights were valid, it would be necessary to judge and a long

time. he said, the only thing left to do is kiss it in plain text. everything will be a kiss only a kiss will remain in ukraine come on let's then. i will not aggravate this situation, it is already acute. and i will tell you who directly makes the decision today in ukraine , including the palaure, see yesterday. uh, the head of the sbu went to the report, and uh, he reported the situation on sleep for several hours. uh, the us ambassador to ukraine has already arrived at the president's office today. and there, yermak reported to her the situation as it was, that is , here you are, the operational leadership of ukraine is implementing specifically valid signs , uh, the united states is everything in ukraine. if there is such a thing, if there is a kabanda face from her, and people monks will simply be thrown out into the street, that is, either it will be in a mild form, it will be in a hard form, no influence on this process. unfortunately for me they are. there are cultures. is zelensky does not accept there is

a us ambassador and where did we already have it from? wait, so we already had seconds. here. i don't want you to sound like that, you understand, well, i don't understand responsibility. yes, here i am, if you thought. over there, i thought so, and so you can hear no. that's why i asked you a question, so that you could clarify no, of course, that they obey the orders of the american ambassador they do. it is voluntary by one's own choice. they appointed themselves this chief. they accepted it, so you say they don't participate. i now beg your pardon. yes, they participate, they certainly participate, and they say what they filed, what danilov says, you understand, well, you can still say a number of kwerks. well, they are ugly people. i don't want to pronounce their names even in this studio. this is really a pack of people , zelensky's team. i sign here with the definition, uh, of a woman of gender, regarding,

freeze truce. i would start, i would continue the topic of alexander lukashenko's proposal with a statement by the prime minister orban of hungary, it was said today, mister. well ban-e spoke about the fact that last year the leaders of the european union discussed themselves, and the introduction of peacekeeping let's see. a year ago , the collection was about whether it is possible to send lethal weapons to ukraine hungary then and now they said no, but the strange west also hesitated. so i'm now the result, maybe now it's just a flyer or how many planes or shells with sran-containing elements or troops? we are close to the fact that in the conversations of european leaders , the question of which countries should send troops of some kind

of peacekeeping type to any form of peacekeeping troops or is it better not to send borders has become legitimate and accepted. he is a politician, but i, as a citizen of ukraine , absolutely clearly understand what we are talking about, what is it about supplying only weapons to ukraine, and all the weapons, or still sending in troops, what does mine-making troops mean? what does this mean, who will introduce it? to the troops? hungary poland romania or with the whole or each of the countries - separately, where these troops will be stationed in transcarpathia in lvov us bruce on the dnieper where what is it? and here is the statement. eh, obviously. we we understand why orban i at least understand exactly. yes, i understand that there is, if such a position is being discussed here. two positions, if you want to lead troops, if you don’t want, that’s what lukashenko answered option b then russia with all its might and put pressure

on nuclear weapons, including options. and here's a change, a truce or as he said lukashenka is all frozen. what is it for ukraine today? how is it how it should be? here, uh, i'd be in favor. i 'd love to be in favor of this offer. i am for even no tribal contests. well, how many people do i have dima? well, in theory , what do you say, we should have a denser counterattack or how the offensive should be . at least i'm trying to analyze. what does it mean, what is russian, it is kaiet, 1953, it has been frozen, since then it has not been defrosted well? and where frosts, according to what lukashenka's entry is now, which will or will not be prepared in this case, so you talked? yes, you know, that person often talks about our only shows, all this, or petrov

with valery, when they described hyde park. here entered all your worries laid out, what now to do with your worries? i don't really understand. and how these people here in russia in ukraine are not worried about all these things or for them, everything is clear. do you think you or you are their concern? subtract or multiply? so i asked a question, dear max answered already have some anxiety relief. maybe some more. sorry about max's answer - this is max's personal opinion by the way, by the way, i'm not sure if this relieves anxiety. this amazes him. this gives rise to him, you know, because you can’t take it off with one hand, son. it's not such a simple matter. you understand what's the matter. that's when and you including all these years. why did the spiridons in this speak on nu relate to such a disregarding question? yes, that's how it is. here ukraine does what it wants, and does it right, close to the text. you are such a stance occupied. so these are the consequences. it was

easy to understand then, then it was easy for america to speak for us. whatever we want, it does. and now you are looking for the same easy way, but it will not look like you. i'll try to remove some of the concerns. in fact, ukraine is already doomed. and if the conflict is stopped, in any form, according to the korean scenario, according to some other, that is, it means, well, a few things. and, firstly, more often, it will be presented for payment to any ukrainian authorities. zelensky it will be or anyone else, then there is a credit load one way or another will begin to flatten a and the financial system, and any government loses its legitimacy, because e and zelensky feed his administrations exclusively with war and military mythology. if it disappears in society, questions arise anyway. what's next? that is, for the sake of which this is still another consideration i have

about the korean script. it sounds very often, but no one wants to be there. well, let's go inside a little. this is a very bad scenario. this is catastrophic for ukraine. and after frosts, and the war in korea south korea is simple. well, she lived through 40 years of a fascist dictatorship with millions of people killed in prisons. before the seventies. well, somehow i started to get out of all this , that is, it’s completely hell, here’s a liberal economy and everything else, that is , anyone who knows a little about the history of the korean conflict there will say, no, we don’t want that. everything was fine with us even until the hours of the koreans until 14.00. and i don't know who beat whom better the north koreans or the south. here you are right. maxim look to watch you know, it can be hard, but

they didn’t officially hand over their women as a revenue item of the state budget to prostitution in north korea, but in the south for decades they officially handed over their women as a state, as a state policy american soldiers and entire cities handed over their women i forgot how they the abandonment of these women, as they are called in korean , were organized by the korean authorities to turn them in as prostitutes, and this was a profitable item for the south korean budget. so there is always something to compare. i think i still i will add. it feels like it's not. please check yes, i will add a couple more words. this is what the end of the war or the freeze means, just the end of the war means, and in any case, any country, that is, any policy, economic structure. she lives by some myth, some dream. ukraine does not. now there is no other dream and no one condemns. how real is it, except to defeat russia. that is, if this disappears,

then you need to throw all the mythology aside . that is, one way or another, you need to somehow to build relations with russia to put up with russia humanitarian issues. well, in general , to discuss everything that does not fit in the head of those people who have been there for the last three years. they destroyed the remnants of the state and it was, in general, so-so they finished it off to the end two words, does it suit russia yes, of course, it will suit russia in any scenario. what did you want in the end i didn’t expect you to notice such a position, because uh, well, we often discuss with you that it’s normal i only greetings but we have a position in this case everything matches what you wrote. i agree. i will say harshly with two crises. do you understand? why is this impossible, because for america it is a complete loss of control over its asset. and for the authorities in ukraine, this is the collapse of power. yes, chaos, and from which they can

not take their feet, but this is short, if what sergei writes. and it's a downfall, it's because this regime is american. the leash can only operate in war mode ; mode is not working. here i am. well, sorry to interrupt. uh, yes, finished, well, it's interesting to the theory of conducting peacekeeping forces, where there are a lot of all sorts of different questions. here is the relationship of dmitry sergeevich peskov, this is a statement that is very important to pay attention to. and if we are talking about some serious agreements, then, of course, this is a potentially extremely dangerous discussion. you know that such forces are world practice, and not usually

used with the consent of both parties. in this case, potentially. this is a very dangerous topic. that's all, yes, everything is very clear, and so on, what are you going to lead to, if you are going to introduce something peacemaking somewhere. so tell me, come to moscow tell me what you're going to do, don't come, understand? this means that a difficult situation is developing there, as in ukraine such an orthodox world. here are the captures of the preparation of the capture of temples. and here, some people think that the purpose of this is to turn over to the dog allegedly to seize these premises. well, what difference does it make which orthodox church in ukrainian or orthodox ukrainian yes, from matriarchy and patriarchy, it means to select moscow, but this is an intermediate cycle, the task of the antichrist

is to destroy, all russian orthodox this land. just destruction. there are approximately many such people in the history of mankind and therefore the capture of this temple of these temples. this is an intermediate link. and here's to take what you know, even if they capture there will be no grace. it's only stones, there and so on. this is a dangerous and misinterpretation of the situation. what does these stones mean? this is a thousand-year-old, which means temples prayed to by the holy ancestors prayed by people, on all these walls their voices of their prayer are imprinted. they bring grace. even. if the antichrist captures this grace, it remains there later, isn’t that why many people who ruin temples and let us pray carry these stones on them. so the targets are praying. restore these temples. why else? sometimes, uh, the temple of christ was restored by the saviors, because they do not lose their holiness. give holiness to this antichrist, it is absolutely impossible, you will not

give up, you know this is the logic. what, well, well, well, there's one good thing to leave. let's take it with us, give it to it. no, you are agitating this defeatist mood now. i'll tell you now that you don't. why about yourself. so you are warm studios here, why are you agitating yourself? so who are you calling? i'll tell someone, but i call. in general, i am addressing the russian intelligentsia, if there is one, and such, er, very authoritative monks, who should, in general, but show their position by appeals. here is not only an appeal to the orthodox world, an appeal to the slavic world , an appeal to humanity in general, what is today this is happening and it is necessary to say this, but to state your position, because the peoples of many of their countries. they are waiting for some kind of signals from russia , from the russian intelligentsia, from russian thinking thinkers, there and so on, because there is an official position, it means, uh,

people's position, and this connection between peoples is impossible. yes, let it be destroyed. for example, we see the opposition in north macedonia is fighting, which means that with their power, so that they, well, no matter how they pass, uh, planes, that means ukraine glory to me now i'll tell you what slovakia means, it's there. uh , above the supreme judge, who filed a complaint with the prosecutor's office against the supreme power of the slavs. that is, today they are in kiev, which means they are fighting, they must be morally supported. yes, here i am, to be honest. here are those who fight in greece in slovakia, i support spiridon, of course, and you are always sergey. and you, i, of course, agree with the patrol. what will you do, then once again put your support. i am very flattering and really like it, yes, but i would like that authoritative people who know in the world as writers how thinkers, like monks, which means

they are honored, because they will be heard , we will speak. yes, some certain people will listen to us, but we need all the slavic pan-orthodox authorities who must convert , and also a blessed world, and the slavic world is poland, our toughest adversary the slavic world is slovenia slovakia their croatia leaders who arrived today in kiev there is no slavic world. this is the police representatives, there are no slavic world pieces. we must draw the people to our side, the peoples who in general, it is waiting for some kind of moral support, so that we want it, we know they appreciate it, otherwise we declare them enemies and that's it. we know, we know and appreciate them. see everything here with a difference of views. everyone is ready to morally support those who oppose ukrainian nazism and the destruction of the orthodox church. i think that if i just produce in russia it will be 90%

understand, regardless of seeing the right, this is the case. e , there is no really slavic world in this, this floor was remembered by our intelligentsia from the end of the 19th century, which was sick with the delirium of the proto-slavic world as the basis, as well as with a new political self-determination. here i want our political self-determination. from now on , brad was dispensed with in due time, the process said a wonderful thing, that is, it did not have time. what will be worth a thousand words when there will be a strength of hand, and what is happening now in ukraine and the destruction of orthodoxy and already the threat of physical destruction of carriers, orthodoxy is in fact, that incident was and that explanation for which the russian soldier is fighting. we fight not only against historical nazism in ukraine, we are fighting, as the ancient romans said, for the altars of the hearths for really places of power for

our shrine, his pechersk lavra is one of the shrines of universal law. the fact that the false patriarch bartholomew is, in fact, a servant of the antichrist in this situation with his tomos and the support of raskolnikov e. it only says what is really there. uh, there are traitors, uh, apostates who made their way into very high, uh, offices and uh structures, but what is satan, it's god everywhere and this and that monkey the person that the zelensky company is now trying to implement in kiev is really hmm firstly an attempt to further deepen the divide between the two slavic peoples slavic exists and uh, geopolitical and purely ethnographic. it's just that he has many hundreds of years of school. this is a fact. and the demarcation is not only confessional, but also geographical, and was correctly noticed about poland and the balkans. and by the way, uh, konstantin leontiev wrote that it is a mistake

to rely on the intelligentsia of the western slavs, because it is the relative just here of this european ideology, but the slavic world under the leadership under the leadership of russia this is really a geopolitical reality. and if we try to play, uh, that's equal rights in all sorts of european with a form of democracy. well, of course , then we will be losers, because the slavic world is really now extremely disunited and heterogeneous, but, of course, our hand is not being applied to this now. tell me when he was united from his homeland and so on. this is the first question. and the second question. you know, when yes indeed there is a linguistic relationship. uh, in that sense, uh, tribal kinship is deep. yes, slavic indeed. there are plenty along the line. uh, creeds of the past. yes , there really is, but it cannot be like she is slavic, because e does not

match the contours. e, slavic e, resettlement is a big geopolitical flaw, and not earnings, that is, we will. well, yes, and on the head and happy, well, the logic of historical development. why then can they do us this way, but we can’t, because that i tell you your thesis. how do you scream here all the time, that we are different. so prove that you are ours to each other and the nakos must be introduced there, as they do. that's all dosvidos we will disperse and we will never get together then, because, because we others will come out talking about a multipolar world. where did it go with you, now the peaceful roads of the world of sovereign peoples of sovereign states. where are you now forming, i don’t have enough

closer poles and i don’t give a damn that tataya are not slavs, so keep everything down and call everything russians. yes, that's it, that's it. here is a rake option, once again i say you need to understand. well, as it were, when we say that our strength is in the truth is right, i am really strong in the truth well, then you need to follow your plan so that you don’t fake it anywhere, because no one will believe you when you tell me in one of my programs about the free self-determination of sovereign states, and in the other about the fact that we will introduce something to them there, you understand? i ask where is the truth about the world of free self-determined states or about what we will implement and have not finalized for more than a minute. do you understand that slovenia is more

croatia and not freedom soba, or how in bulgakov’s novel someone comrades to them, comrade alexander comrade alexander poland self-determined is not free, they were captured and occupied by the americans, how is croatia like their words right? and what do you want you to do the same i - no, we have to help. i don't want the difference between us and you to me, our whole history is long enough to understand and draw lessons from there. this first. secondly, i actually, in truth, believe that the world that lies ahead belongs to sovereign peoples and sovereign states. who can be like this is really the main principle of the new world order. and you comrades are a little behind. i would say so softly in the nineteenth century, few can yes

, indeed, but this is a matter for another discussion, but the words of the rim. i would like everyone to remember to be in front of themselves before. all truthful, but you understand donald trump travir said, i want to show this about relations with russia a gas station with a bunch nuclear weapons and calling putin an authoritarian tanker with a legacy of nuclear weapons and the old soviet union is exactly the type of simple-minded thinking that led decades of failed diplomacy and eventually war. and what will this war lead to such people as don’t worry and ron desantis, very similar to each other, who insist on our arrogant attitude towards russia as a deeply inferior country that has no history, no culture, no pride, not only ignorant and stupid, but their relationships make peace negotiations impossible

absolutely impossible under my administration. we have been tough on russia , tougher than under any other administration , but we have also shown respect for russia and the russian people, we have shown an understanding of russian history and the fact that russia lost over 20 million lives in world war ii. they fought alongside us. similar neocon rhetoric mocking russia's nuclear weapons as well as hints that putin should be tried and allegedly executed as a war criminal. only increases the likelihood of a deadly nuclear escalation, in fact. this testifies to the lack of depth of frivolity and inability to understand the intricacies and complexities of foreign policy. you cannot do certain things. and finally achieve peace. now is not the time for learning as we face the possibility of nuclear war and our leaders. if you can

call them that, they led us to this, and here we are , the word nuclear was not even mentioned during the trump administration. now she is mentioned. every hour of every day. we need a statesman and peacemaker with white house, and not someone who recites thoughtless and reworked theses in order to win the approval of a failed foreign policy establishment that did not know what they were doing in 2024. i am the only candidate who can prevent world war iii. i will prevent world war iii, no one else will. it is clear this is such a sharper development of what i noticed, by the way, since january, many of you have been here witnessing all this. moreover, i argue that trump adhered to this position throughout his first term other the thing is that they interfered monstrously, and he was forced to spin, how to shoot at the camels of the syrian desert in a frying pan, so that before that he warned everyone to get out of there in

hiding. all i will shoot, everyone is ready, then i shoot, driving the fleet to the coast of korea and back , even the gentleman slightly demonstrated sanctions. well, the position, yes, there was this one, well, i say that if it's actually a miracle that i was elected then, because if there was a clintosh, then everything would be in the sixteenth seventeenth eighteenth year in a bright bright form. now the question is now the question is clear that if it is still holding on, then there is a group behind it. influential people and a loner would not have survived. this is completely obvious to me, and now they are going to imprison him, and 30 counts of charges are going to be specifically imprisoned in this way. uh , on tuesday, he will serve charges that have never been for a minor infringement. gu living movement 150 years ago, they are 130. here but there was no such thing. and, of course, it will be

an event on tuesday. well, let's see if they put him in jail or not. it's up to you to choose suitable win or not win and the most interesting even if he wins will he be able to do at least something? so what is the question? uh, i don't think he'll be allowed in before the election, to be honest, because, well, it's kind of destructive. that's a very long story. well, let's just say that it destroys the bet on which the american establishment staked everything , because the escalation in ukraine means that almost everything is staked, well, at the dawn , choose any color, that is, the person who comes says, don't we, playing in a new way excuse me, but what is everyone else doing. what to do? all vk what do a huge number of american diplomats who have been doing for decades? well, it’s good that they have been preparing for this war for years, that they need to resign. it just doesn't seem to work that way to me, most likely, i'm guessing. yes, here are some tension relief. she will come at some point, but we have seen it, but i

think the americans will choose. well , some new softer leader, who, well, that's fine, most likely for everyone. well, the question of his age, in general pretty hard to ignore. they are of course for the last 8 years. they got used to the fact that at the head of the country, well, in general , there are, to put it mildly, very elderly people, but in 2 years they will be quite elderly and trump is elderly by 8 , almost one and a half are left, well, one and a half and biden too. in general, it doesn’t look like an energetic , powerful old man, the leader of the russian revolution, therefore, well, he doesn’t like it before santi. well, i think that most likely, get annoyed, we’ll all see how polytech works. it's great that you've started noticing this already. there is a landing. here's how cool said. i - says - behind the trump mountain. yeah, i won't let him get arrested. here, uh, in florida, i don't admit it, this political all justice is very subtle, very clever.

as political technologists write, because trump will be imprisoned or something else will happen to him, but for trump's electorate. e landing will be the one who did not betray there? yes, that's exactly how it was chosen. well, read the sign alexander, we look really defending the trump now landing with uh, conducting his election campaign. perhaps not in a year and a half, but in one electoral period. maybe so, ah, the future trump is really suspended now, but literally by hairs, but according to the us constitution, nothing prevents a person even with a criminal history. what is it called in america to take the presidency. uh, if trump is not sentenced to a real prison term, then nothing under american law prevents him from nominating his candidacy, after all. uh, bill clit didn't get fired from the presidency because of the monica scam. on the contrary, it makes trump. might even be more popular followed as well cursed

crime. uh, yes, but still. all the same. uh, nevertheless, the biology scandal did not happen, so you can't underestimate trump. moreover, he demonstrated himself as a person capable of practically, having lost everything, to rise again both in business and in politics, therefore, for now, the trump factor from the election race in the states, uh, cannot be written off in any case, but in the landing, of course, it’s a matter of a very powerful move, of course, aimed at advancing his future career. so far, haven't lost anything. he uh is in the lead, and quite noticeable in matters of meeting the republicans is what we just heard, we understood and the americans understood why they would operate there in the course of their future. i still think of the election campaign instinct of self-drying, which is the strongest of all people, but he criticized pay attention, naming non-democrats by name. what we are used to, but two of our fellow party members

of the landing party and not the roma who went against obama at one time and lost from the republican party, but. and yet. i wanted them to be criticized by the entire establishment of the party, including those who don’t particularly like him in this situation, very tough statements were made by senators and congressmen up to the third person in the united states, uh, speaker of the house of representatives kevin mccartty, who said very harshly that what the democrats are doing now. this is an attempt to use the concept of the judiciary, which is sacred to us, as a weapon, and not to unite. and i don’t think that it’s easy for the democrats to put tampo-, e . that's why i was in his opening speech and said that it would be another show. we 'll see such and such there, but i would now , as it were, complete the first part of our

conversation. eh, your thought or even a little bit , so to speak, raised it up, it is interesting to listen to the performance. trump and the fact that they discussed the submission of aleksandrovich lukashenko why is your thought an instinct for self-preservation and sensations? eh, the worst? what can be a nuclear war, which yes, which trump uses well, political scientists and new yorkers would immediately write that lukashenka gave uh, trump a good pitch. agree. yes, but they could give them yes, such an axis will appear. you see, look at the political trump lukashenko. uh, of course landing. will be able to relay trump's thoughts, which are generally quite popular and benefit from the fact that he is younger and not so, let's say. uh, well, uh not

that offensive, but there's a problem with what trump is voicing about the fact that only i can negotiate. only i can, so to speak, remove the threat of world war, it is reinforced. know than the previous one term. exactly, you know, yes, and he has a ground in it as they say, they have nothing on your nobody. we interrupt for advertising, then immediately disappear. she is not breathing, just on monday at 20:00 20:00 - this is big hit this is masha she makes her first order on apteka.ru with a discount already 11% kill, and you are

the solution for every day from vtb convenient vtb online transfers, this is when one number is enough to make someone's day sparkle with new colors, when you can please your loved ones even from afar and get support at the right time. register in vtb for free card for life and every day will be better. go to vtb and everything will work out. and spring is already here and here and in general in all pyaterochka stores there is a warm cyclone and blue prizes. make purchases register checks in total from a thousand 100 rubles. a week and win a cyclone of spring prizes in pyaterochka well, it's time to finally cashback more than thirty billion

bonus rubles on all videos and eldorado 30 years in the top two two twister deluxe for 169 rubles. kfc dj, that's why i left you as the host of the first hobby show in odnoklassniki. amazing people are waiting for their interesting hobbies, watch and guess the passion of heroes together with the stars. and this is my hobby. and watch the new hobby show with odnoklassniki users only on the site ok.ru my hobbies. its ok? but how delicious cool loves the taste? a novelty in the artra line of cream arthroxicam three-room composition promotes

accelerated penetration of components into the focus of pain by modern painkillers maximum concentration of arthroxicam for accelerated penetration into the focus of pain during the easter circulation russian lotto, each winning ticket from each ticket sold, part of the funds will be transferred to charity. buy tickets and on the stoloto website i am sure that you are buying osago at a bargain price on sravni you will find it cheaper. get osago with savings on the number one service in russia if you have insurance, then be sure to compare it on the website and in the application pay less than maslobod 108.90. if you miss new music from tens of millions of tracks. embedded appliances

or too boring. exit one by another person. do you remember your name? on

channel russia many shows that open up new emotions i'm in love with this song premiere today at 21:30 on the russia channel alexander yatsenko in exchange for a pound of sugar, but also received a round golden thing with hebrew letters obliging not to sell and return in exchange for a kilo of sugar . at the end of the war, you will return without a bag and sold the future.

this is a program, who is against on the channel russia 1 e we continue our discussion. and so, while we were completing the previous part, it must be said that the security council was holding a meeting on the most important issue. according to what the president of russia will now say to all of us, changes in international life have required us to seriously adjust key strategic planning documents, including the concept of the foreign policy of the russian federation, which outlines the principles of the task of giving priority to diplomatic activity. the ministry of foreign affairs , in coordination with the presidential administration, the security councils to governments , carried out large-scale and painstaking work to update it and bring it in line with

modern geopolitical realities today. we decree the approval of the updated concept of the foreign policy of the russian federation well, here is sergei viktorovich lavrov, the minister of national affairs, here are some of the characteristics of the logic of the document . start of a special military operation. in particular , it is stated to be unprecedented in recent decades. international level tension is recognized as the existential nature of the threats to the security of the development of our country, created by the actions of an unfriendly state as the main initiator. we are directly named the united states of america as the conductor of the anti-russian line and, in general , the policy of the west aimed at the worldwide

weakening of russia, but it is characterized as a hybrid war of a new filter. these are the characteristics in the new hybrid war doctrine, of the type. clearly, now you need to read the doctrine itself. yes, it's very difficult. here, but the second principle that i managed to see in advertising that we look at the world as a community of cultural and historical civilizational organizations, i don’t tell further humanly with my own language, but this principle seems to me very important. yes, there are different civilizations , different civilizations have the right to uh, their historical. e, existence, but really it is necessary to understand it is necessary to read carefully. this is at first glance. here is from what i saw there and looked and heard. this is a fixation. well , actually fixing what both the president and ministry of foreign affairs. and in general, and we are in the studios and so on. here's a fix on, uh, what's going on in the world with international

politics and so on. and you know, in fact , this abyss that exists there and hmm in general, just even in the perception yes, there the world is its structure and so on. she 's here we just uh, here in the studio we listened to trump yes, who talks about nuclear war , that something needs to be done and so on. you see, in parallel with him, biden spoke, who, uh, talked about the fact that transgender people americans form the soul of our nation. you see, you can laugh, you can grin, you can spit in the end. but you understand this. this is a very serious thing, of course, read what they write, uh, people here on fox news in the comments about this speech and the fact that he said it inside and it’s clear that, well, these biden words. mostly inland were turned. yes , about the struggle there with the republicans with the conservatives, there and so on. but the whole world hears these words. and how do you think

he will react to this about the country? where the soul of the country is formed by a transgender? it seems to me that most countries and peoples will not like it very much. yes, this is the position. if you americans want to live like this, live like that, only you have a rich reservation experience there , make a reservation for yourself and live like you do. hey, offer. today we had the whole program, well, more big. rather, part of the program was devoted to the events that take place in the kiev-pechersk lavra. and just like that, circumstances arose that a new concept of external policy and one of the priorities of moscow, but, just the same, the protection of the russian orthodox church is called. it is very important. i 'll allow myself to quote the priorities of russia's humanitarian policy abroad of counteracting the company of russophobia with the protection of the russian language. russian sports culture russian orthodox church and so on. and

here is a very important point, really to those events. occur in the lavra, they should not be treated, well, it is clear that believers treat them very sharply, very cordially. but, and there are people who do not believe and here we all must understand that this is not only a struggle for religion, not only a struggle. here, as raik said, such a wording for the premises is, first of all, a struggle for our history, for our russian history. why is it that we all remember so well? yes , nestor the chronicler is one of the most iconic figures. this is a monk who was canonized, not only by our church, but even catholics revere him. and so i will remind you how it begins, but the tale of bygone years. it starts with a unique phrase. this is the tale of bygone years. where did the russian land come from? and who reigned there in kiev, and so on, that is, this is our history, and indeed the fact that this doctrine was adopted is, well, it gives me personally. here is the ground

for some such quiet joy that indeed we will defend these frontiers, but an important one. in which i also wanted to remind you, you know, here are people, believers , they pass on other information from mouth to mouth, such a kind of word of mouth about what kind of prophecy we are. i will now announce it to you when the last monk from kiev-pechersk leaves laurel. yes, there is such a prophecy in 3 months, and the dam of the kiev sea will break through and the lord will punish kiev for desecrating the shrine. well, i absolutely agree with the maintenance, but about the doctor. i will say i am very glad that this doctrine was adopted, that i am very glad that understanding about hybrid warfare has entered the doctrine. well, our academy made great efforts to bring this concept into circulation, and we gave a scientific definition, and that's exactly what anya was saying just now, it's just a struggle for one's own spiritual space space. it not only means, uh, the political one is a little wider, and that's just

the opponents of russia. they want everything in every possible way. to narrow the geopolitical space of russia and geographically, economically, cybernetic spiritual cultures are everything. that's just the fight against. so the russian language is a struggle against monuments. eh, cyrillic and so on. this is just, and the narrower your geopolitical capabilities are, you slowly go to uh, reduction. that is, you are going to lose your position, so i hope that further already she must go. here down is the order to find specialists who can put these doctrines into practice. there is not much time to get all the points or the main ones there . yes, who uh paid attention to, uh, it says that special importance is given to deepening ties and coordination with china and india and not named

friendly global centers of power. that is, everything is more or less understandable by china, but you see how india is singled out from the total number of other countries is not necessary. yes, india will go, the fiercest struggle, because the americans they are also trying in every possible way to take india to their side. to attract her just yesterday. e hmm washington , i don't remember exactly, who did he put some administration official made a statement about india that is not an allied relationship. but yes is so close that there are no such tests of relationships, on either side. here , in the place of the canadians, i would be offended in the place of the british. but in general, they also want to attract india. therefore, now it is very important, especially in the year when india presides over the g20 and it is quite possible that president putin will go to delhi i agree on the time myself, but this democratic declaration, which was not signed, is complete nonsense.

here, although there are many pages, six or seven pages, it means, well, everything was accepted there for the sake of one thing, they discuss russia, this is one point, it ’s interesting that india didn’t sign this particular point and brazil yes, and armenia, yes, yes, here are a few. you see, here for the sake of, well, everything was started for this, well, because no one will read rubbish all the newspapers should have published one point with the reasoning of russia and so, india did not sign this point, and the fight will be serious. i agree with you. i've drawn attention to such a point in this concept of the new yes, where it is said about security why about security? because, as a matter of fact, uh, we remember when russia did. the us-nato proposal - that was a few years ago then maybe if the parties at least started discussing, uh, the issue of security and russia's security vision. maybe there wouldn't be that large-scale conflict, and the situation that we have before us. here it is written that moscow seeks to ensure

security equally for all countries and on the basis of the principles of declarations. here's how to find this principle of reciprocity in reality, that is, the security of one side should not interfere with the security of the other side , and especially neighbors. yes, you know, what is needed for this is to kill, the parties to the agreement had sovereignty. now, if they have sovereignty, they proceed only from their own interests and no one else's consensus. always to be found can't be found if if one of the parties is a conductor of third external interests. everything will be impossible to agree on. you can, because this is a fake fake situation , you know dmitry, in order to assess the new doctrine of russia's foreign policy, you need to study the old doctrine, see what was there and what was accepted now and understand in connection with what it happened, and i think ukraine is in this plan played an important role, as a detonator

of technical processes, here are tectonic shifts in its policies that are taking place and, uh, they have happened and are happening and will continue to happen, because i believe that the time of blitzkriegs in this war. it has already passed. there will be no war. it has acquired such a long protracted character. if you want a war of attrition and all this time these shifts are its political ones, they will also react to them, respectively, it will be necessary to react completely differently. you know, i will still once again return to the inestra chronicler that i spoke about. i want to remind you that since 1997 , ukraine has been trying to win over nestor the chronicler to its side as much as possible, but, in my opinion, 9 november now here, if my memory serves me in the ninety-seventh year , the day of the ukrainian language of ukrainian writing was celebrated for the first time. yes, that's all that is connected, that is, they tried in every possible way. show that nestor who wrote the history of russia, the history of russia yes, and the successor is russia, that he is their ukrainian and that

is why the ukrainian language and so on. it's just that we might not be able to see it from here in moscow. yes, such a quiet glanders, all these processes were going on in general. now they have come to what they have come to. yeah well, uh the construction of ukraine as anti-russia, that's where nestor is there and that's it. you can go there. yes, that's all, yes, and bandera, yes, in the end, and all that. in fact, er, here is a fixation of what is happening in the world. she is definitely important. yes , we have already talked about this, that in much of what has now got it was discussed. it's not just not a sbuk. you barakhty that once something switched, suddenly a special military operation appeared, and we changed our understanding, ukraine, for all the importance, for all the soreness of this issue of ukraine for us and for ordinary citizens of russia and leaders of the country, and so on. it's still just one of the pieces. here is that hybrid war. just whatever you want to call it, but it's just a fragment. it's very

painful bright. uh, such as a trigger, there and so on, but here is this war. it's been going on for a very long time and uh, actually. here is what is now fixed, it is fixed, just that stage of this war with the west, uh, which has now come to what we have come to now. you know, by the way, i'll add here to what you said, i like it, by the way, the method of work of our state power, because right there with the concept of law refers to law and legal documents always draw up the prevailing state of matter and understanding in society. they formalize it in a legal way, and you see, from changes to the constitution to changes in doctrine, this is what you said, our legal work and registration. in the right of it all follows. understanding and awareness

of the current state of affairs, they are so from something there that came to mind, and this is very important. this means that the historical approach is much more than a liter here, it is taken into account today. i have everything right now, watch the program and see you soon. the information service of the russian tv channel continues its work on the air, you watch the news. my name is maria sittel hello , a thousand russians were trapped in a snow trap on the m4 don highway between trucks and fenders in general.