near on sunday exactly 8:00 am. we watch all the news always available on the media platform in the application on the site, as you prefer, and for now we will all see you in the next issue at 16:00. good afternoon. this is a program who is against on channel russia 1 and in the dmitry kulikov studio 19 members of the us congress signed a collective appeal to biden calling for them to stop providing military financial support to ukraine and instead advocate for peace through negotiations between the two countries. it is clear

that biden will try. this letter is not notice in ramstein. today , a regular meeting of the ukrainian military support club chaired by the united states is taking place, of course, kiev, as usual, has a lot of unsatisfied desires. we will follow the news from rammsteino, in the course of our program, another passionate desire of ukraine to join nato, this maniacal desire greatly irritates the members of the alliance because. they understand what is behind this and therefore prefer to get off with vague promises. for example, how stoltenberg does it, ukrainians are the future of ukraine in the euro-atlantic family of allies have agreed that ukraine will become a member of nato. uh, the main focus now, of course, is on how to ensure ukraine

wins. well, then sometime after the victory , the german minister spoke to pistorius about this, let's see. the decision on ukraine's membership in nato, the door is slightly opened, but now is not the time to make it closed, for this, first you need to end this conflict. this is an attack, and then in new time it is necessary to think carefully. this is not the question that now decided out of a sense of mediocrity, because it really matters. you must do this with deep understanding. you have to make a decision with a cold head and a warm heart, and not, on the contrary , some kind of fucking zhamsky, and there is a nurse opposite. you saw, this is the one who spoke on visas. well , i liked about whom clean hands were not enough. just clean. well, probably just with clean hands, there are big problems, so here is the third component. for some reason it didn't come in. well, in general, it’s clear that you called all the time

our attention here. yes well, here, it is possible now to the end of the week already some. well, bring some amount, because it's interesting. as i understand it, this became the main content of yesterday's bazaars between uh stoltenberg and zelensky that's because even this zelenskaya gang is now beginning to understand that something went wrong, that nothing is wrong, that something went wrong so everything, dear presenters, this week went wrong. the first time ec a we discussed this more than once in your studio. poland is white then slovakia is further, romania, yes, uh, they imposed direct sanctions i’ll call it in a word, yes, but against ukrainian agricultural goods. and what did i do next and i said, well, listen. and how do you introduce it, and we are here , we are like collective bodies, what will we do , so let's so now we will drive, understand,

that is, if you seized the initiative and instead of entertaining the situation and ukraine is shocked by how wait, and no one from ukraine, uh, at the eu level, discussed this as a partner. with the country that received the association this is a very gesture - he is very tough such an attack, you know, because we don’t have a trade. uh, and problems across the sea to walk and i take out the grain. so now we have also closed the western border, and without warning. this is a very tough second again. eu we also discussed in your studio, i think, last week, when the eu decided to allocate 2 billion, and then said 1 billion exactly for the purchase of weapons by the eu as a collective body. they did not agree among themselves, warsaw and paris argued and there is no decision to really conclude a collective agreement and the eu to supply weapons, even the minister kuleba can even imagine, but he true well, unfortunately he said, but

nonetheless. he, too, as it is called in ukrainian, directly growled against the eu and now it is necessary. here you have shown that they even say what he said yesterday. in kiev, and what he is saying now, even in words, there is already a discrepancy. yes, i didn't speak in my mind. and as a matter of fact, it's worth what he said sometime in the future. now look, he used the word to secure victory. yes, that is, nato wants to provide victory for ukraine against whom against the russian federation yes. that is, it is necessary, again, to the side next to the side of the non-helper, but victory should be everything, of course. here is another thing that worries zelensky. after all, everyone understands what is behind these words. here yesterday showed their negotiations. yes, and yet he says, we need something more that you, uh, promise us all the time, yes, the question arises, by the way, among the members. nato, the population of the nato countries

has a question. and what does ukraine want more and the answer immediately arises, because zelensky asks it's time for you to fully intervene in everything. of course, here you are, otherwise you are us in the grass or we already have losses , crazy prospects are bad, the only possible forecast for improvement is that you are interfering? let's call it the admission of ukraine to nato or call it guarantees, but we understand what is meant, it means that you do not need to directly intervene in the conflict. we listen precisely because we understand what is meant. we don't accept no guarantees on this we are not going to give you a reason. let's do it ourselves. so you show here , the more cold showers. when you showed the minister of defense of germany, the same one says, something was covered, but after the end of the conflict with a cold

head and a warm heart, and not vice versa with a hot head. yes, we then understand, that is, ukraine now zelensky and the team. there is only one chance. go blackmail and say, either you take us over right now or what, and or we give up we say that we will not concede the contrast. we we are talking about the fact that we are stopping this massacre, because the goals that we have stated that we are going for here and there, you know, i continue your fantasy , poroshenko comes out from around the corner and says, so move away boy, well, go to jail understand with a detachment of exalted patriots and speaks to the americans. poroshenko arrived ready to fulfill any of your orders. i agree. i'm waiting for an order, this option immediately, because if the zelensky team has already fit in and signed up for this. as you like to say, the contract was signed. well probably there are, yes, then

there is no reverse gear. there is only one, but again, you know our ukrainian trick. yes , macron, what does he say about the guarantee, what does he say there? you have some unhealthy interesting things with china. well , it’s bigger there, which is not what the makhron says. yesterday i spoke with bendin on the phone and after that an official message came out that the parties discussed concerns about taiwan and expressed their full support for their cause, the situation is very bad for the ukrainian authorities. and god would do nothing with her says ukraine is in a very bad situation, because i see it written in white thread or in black and white. ukraine must go on the counterattack, ukraine must may 30, 10, april 30, may 10 , june 25, but we must go to the slaughter. we don't have any other option. here is what is monstrous for me personally. well, you see, well, there must be some other way out. well, is the whole world

really going to look at how the ukrainians lead the naming lead to the slaughter, you understand, because the world is not here that we are you yourself chosen, you know? you yourself have chosen it all. and by the way, you're having an important discussion about what you're saying in the studio right now. it's late ignition. i told you, it was a year ago exactly in april last year, when the whole istanbul story broke, why did i tell you this? you see, now you are saying this, in a year. well, after a while it will become a significant factor. well, the consciousness of people in ukraine, how long will it take? i don't know, i don't know what you're outraged about. uh, so to speak , the relationship between ukraine is necessary, as i it seems that everything is fair, yes, ukraine is not a nato country, it is not a party to the conflict. and what do you want ukraine to do? no, i say, you want

ukraine to become a nato country and zelensky wants to become a party to the conflict, this should be the starting point, so, of course, we must resist in every possible way. no no. guys, please don't drag us in here. there is a fifth article. in general, in general, well, then the old song about open doors. well, i ’m direct memory of it, i’ve probably been hearing about open open since the ninety-fourth year, so to speak, the doors are open. yes, i, uh, asked a very simple and understandable question. now, you know, i'm lost in the numbers. some say we have allocated 175 billion, others say 250,250. how much was actually allocated? i don't think anyone knows this number. but the flow of financial e, is in full swing. i'll show you 50 billion here. in my opinion, yes, he only allocated our

support for the same 65 yesterday and is not weakening. i am proud of the progress that we have made in total , the members of the contact group have provided ukraine with more than $50 billion in security assistance. this is a tenfold increase since our meeting. that's just the last few months. we provided equipment and training for nine more armored brigades for ukraine. this has already strengthened ukraine's position on the battlefield. a european consortium is providing leopard tanks. countries continue to coordinate their actions. so why is he there in ukraine? here's what you're missing. something. you understand, you still need to pump again. so to speak, through the world press pumps information that we are for ukraine done. everything no one knows how many of these billions there are. how many tanks actually drove there? what is there? what help? they really did, but for the layman for

the european layman. here he is listening to it all. yes, he allocated 100 billion there. this is 55 billion. they think they have it. well, everything that this country needs was given, and then, and then this is the question of ukraine, and here i asked a question about the macron. uh, beijing is there for a peace plan and everything else, you know, i agree with the opinion that, after all , the europeans understand something about this, something they understand they are counting. and suddenly something goes wrong. well, let's assume ukraine is still under pressure. the west launched a counteroffensive and failed. what to do next here russia went on the offensive and it is now going by leaps and bounds. what to do with russia europe can't influence russia's position states can influence russia on russia's position these europeans can't? apparently decided. and let's we'll try somehow just in case with china what if china can. well, there is one problem there is china. maybe i would like to. well then we

give up the taiman, maybe china will think. is it possible to make some kind of political statement? in trade for? what does politics work for in exchange for what does not happen here. so, do me a favor, and i don’t owe you anything, so, of course, the video, if the last one, i won’t, so to speak , apply. yesterday i asked a question vasily. i say asel. you are not embarrassed by the fact that during this period of time everyone is convinced that we are helping ukraine financially. ask a simple question. how much debt was it written off for ukraine? well, at least one goal was written off no. the decision in yesterday at 2.000 was transferred, not a cent was written off, not a single one was written off at all. do you know why this also makes me think? hmm. they initially understood what to win in this war. they shouldn't have showered this country with dollars . the most offensive thing is that

those people who suffered from these weapons will suffer to pay these debts, you understand? these people will have to pay these debts and are hated on this country. we have already had 100 years for a long time. how long has he been accumulated debts of seventy billion in 2013. e dollars today 173 billion dollars 100 billion in 3 years 100 billion. who will not give this money? yes, there is an option , no, there is no ukraine, dolgov well, here's an option. yes , interesting, especially lately. to analyze why so carefully analyze to look at the nuances, and the statement of western politicians. here, who changed the tone, who remained the same, well, we heard stoltenberg this is absolutely. here, what a year ago, what half a year ago, what a month ago is the same thing, that is

such are the ideological clichés ideological victories of ukraine in general, all countries are members of the alliance for ukraine to become a member of nato without specifying when and look at history in a completely different way there , in fact, if you carefully look at his speech, this is a polite form to say no but so to speak, so that they don’t pick on you, so that the hysteria doesn’t start right away, so that they don’t become e on twitter. uh, write all sorts of emotional indignant statements there and to them, but, in principle, he makes it clear that in general there is no conversation about anything in the foreseeable the future. we don't have any illusions here. and this is interesting. there will be more and more such statements, but the problem is that politics, but in general, it has become too public all over the world, and in the west, especially, events are being held. that's how mandatory programs are. well, in the same place, stalin is already the eleventh, and every

time this poor man needs to say something in what, uh, you translated him like that, but very emotionally. and here you were sitting at that moment. well, someone ran away. it's a pity he's boring. here it is this obligatory program. uh, as we are in a boring lesson at school, we necessarily read the program on in principle, of course, the most interesting thing happens behind closed doors, where the meeting of experts takes place, where they really think about what to do tomorrow after tomorrow a year later, here it is, and the most boring and already very tired of repeating it. these pseudo-patriotic slogans are the same every time , which means, it only means that the victory of ukraine is boring. this is them. i begin to sympathize with them, but i’m only running a table there, in my opinion, at work he has a contract for this. everyone needs it, but still, as far as it is,

and thinner and artistic, but conditionally he already has a bergau only to utter chants. well, you understand you again to you. yes, because everything was recorded very well, that they recorded the phrase. this is right. this is right. that 's because, for example, i always appreciate your participation, yes, in programs, because we can very easily remember about your participation. well, as it were, to be yes , it’s worth turning to the quasi-l and immediately bach’s memory comes to everyone, as it was there in reality deed. well, come on, i’m interesting, i’m telling you that the mistake was made then, yes, in april , in fact, earlier, when he tore, uh, the minsk agreements, zelensky blew it up, it was already predetermined earlier later, but after the failure of the minsk agreements, they refused to comply well, i can't make any other public decision, 19. yes, yes, at least in paris 19. well, he keeps making

mistakes. right now, thinking that pronate is getting out. and a very serious mistake, by the way, here, well, i draw your attention. e, driving ukraine is literally in a deadly peak with this case, literally not figuratively deadly. deadly enter. why? well, you look at uh, how the press secretary of the president of russia peskov discussed nato. here's another thing, or i remind you, then yesterday he was expressed to show his aggressive soo. waiting, which we have said before. to start a special war , nato operations obviously continue their line of absorption and drawing ukraine into the alliance , and our president also spoke about this potential threat long before the start, special military operation and all.

this once again demonstrates to everyone and those who are inclined, at least a little, to think with their heads the correctness of the president’s decision to start this operation , based on the interests of the russian federation and the need to ensure its security , we are dealing with an aggressive bloc that considers our country as an adversary and encroaches on security our country. everything is clear. yes, i meant it when i said that zelensky was his ball. now ukraine is literally being sentenced. this is what you need. a yesterday, in my opinion, here the engine also said very clearly and transparently not ukraine's accession to nato absence. in ukraine , it is the target of a special military operation. it was said before the evil of one of the purposes. yes, uh, special military operation was said verbatim, therefore. well, that's even a hypothetical assumption. that some kind of, as you say, and who has it, who and ukraine well , will it be in nato is unacceptable and

unacceptable for russia, which means you won’t understand this. and that this will not be enrolled. what price will it cost everyone the rest, and this is what zelensky does. he breaks himself. he demands with a flock in london yelling. we should be begged by nato so that we should join there. despite the fact that the position of the russian federation is clear and transparent, it is accurate and russia will not retreat from it. do you understand? this is obvious, and this means a sentence not just for the state let's be clear, but this is a sentence for very, very many people. here's the problem. e about the economy and ukrainian finances. we have already said i proceed from the fact that there is an open document. sorry i will quote the ukrainian ministry of finance, on its website it says the structure of the budget, budget revenues , in a separate line, external injections and assistance in international organizations of $ 15 billion and that's it. this is what they are officially,

they say this external has come. the rest is taxes. there, accordingly, everything that the state collects, as a state, is still yes , that is, here are 15 billion. but perhaps there are some shadow ones, but it’s not more than a billion, it’s just more and it’s impossible to pump through any corrupt system. here in such conditions. well, be there, i don't know 16, maybe 17 is all, what is given in real money , the rest is what makes the order. for its military-industrial complex and europe, the united states generally gives guarantees, that is, it’s not even money, it’s guarantees for some kind of loans to others. this is not real money. it's just words it's not even well they it will be. it is natural to call money later. why? actually, as it were, zelensky is denied. but what is it to explain to him that this is generally only the first plan of the game, because further there is the arctic race, where nato, so to speak, is already trying on for the next phase. there is a further chinese race, where already in official nato documents china is called an enemy. well , what is there to explain to him why he is not there now for this, not for this, they removed him. although i must say that zelensky, nato

structures and other globalist, and hmm , large organizations are very lucky, because he does everything. on the. i think that even poroshenko would not have done it the same way somewhere . and this one goes right where they need it too. and here you know such a paradox, because you need all of europe plus turkey and, accordingly, this is not necessary. here are the european ones. some other politicians already have the macron’s state in their heads that, in fact, our national interests should be in something else, but nato’s strategy and the strategy of those who want to continue what is happening now is completely the opposite. and now this is the main one. here, as they say. here is the mismatch of the dualism of consciousness european politicians and the last thing that ukraine can do to change the trend now, because so far it is, of course, such a substance, every next move. well, you have to do it, but it worsens the situation, well, first of all, for ukraine and the west on the board, but it is possible to break this vicious circle, but if today zelensky’s entourage quickly surrenders,

perhaps one of them even then stay alive here. just. well, you need to take and hand over this regime and say, no guys, well, ukraine's projects have already ended on this. this is the only thing that can still be done today. although one must understand that western ukraine will definitely go to poland and the rest will simply cease to be a country. well, maxim is interesting, by the way, to this. mentioned this several times. uh, i would talk not only with the macron, which, for example , he would say to colombia, somewhere in colombia, i wonder what the president of colombia said after talking with the biden, learn from whom? returned some time ago , they bought enough russian weapons, in particular, the helicopter authorities in relation to weapons. such weapons will not be sent to war. it will not be sent to ukraine, it

will not be sent to russia, period after a conversation with mr. biden, both the subject and the subject indicated are interesting, because colombia bought russian weapons from us. but so, this is something that ukraine can be used, but in doing so , it was the most pro-american suffering. and this is the first ever left-wing president and such a cool turn that no one expected from him, not even in terms of what will not be sold to ukraine. and what does he decide to say no to baidu, but the fact that they ceased to be tight against venezuela in this was to this and and now he has almost friendly relations with maduro and the president of venezuela? this is for the americans, this is the strongest blow. i don't even know what to compare it to. but it's like if in the post-soviet space there kazakhstan or belarus would go over to the nato camp somewhere. that's something like this for the americans. well, yes, i according to this you

represented this position, i appealed to this she got divorced. yes, she divorced additionally up to a harsh answer directly after a conversation that should have led to another, and she looked at you alexandrovich because i have a story. here is one more acid. he, of course, that's all he said. well, maybe in the strategy that maxima knew. well, like ours and yours. well, in principle, in principle, i do not know what should follow after these arguments of his. i think it is necessary to distinguish here in such military conflicts it is absolutely normal and natural when the attacked side the attacked country also invades the enemy 's territory, for example, in order to hit the supply, but as long as the cities of the civilian population, the civilian area, are not attacked, you will have to put up with this strategist. this is it that ukraine should

have the right to strike at the territory of russia along the supply routes. i have a counter question. since the supply of this nazi state is carried out through the territory of germany, we will not be cities , only supply nodes. well, it must somehow be, well, the same, true, there life through germany is going on. no, i'm not mistaken for polish women, it's hard for me to agree with maxim yosin, but in this case, i'm absolutely in his position, because i told this story, that is, it cannot be perceived as taken out of context. there are several things in the phrase that need to be very clearly understood. well, as far as nato is concerned , maxim said absolutely here. i agree. and germany stated a clear position. it is quite clear that in the coming decades, at least there will be no nato but for ukraine. but as for this speech, well, if here in moscow they didn’t understand who it was directed to, i’ll explain now. this speech, this phrase is directed to russia, because what is said does not mean

that it was said for ukraine that you can bomb there and you can do it there, this is a conversation about those red lines that russia has long ago outlined and who spoke, and whom we spoke all the time. why don't they bomb? these are the railroad tracks that the leopards walk on. why don't you break up the echelons, through which weapons are supplied to ukraine and what did history say in this phrase? it lies not only, firstly, this is not a call , it is impossible. uh, don't watch the whole conversation. this is a phrase taken out of context. this is not a call to bomb russia, it is simply a statement of the fact that during hostilities, if there is a strike on foreign territory, and at the same time, civilians, the population of infrastructure, and so on and so forth , are legitimate. that is, it is legitimate in reverse and first and foremost and first and foremost rammstein yes, a legitimate target. but i don't know, but

you see, no, we say knows no, no. no, don't confuse two different things. we are now talking about the conflict between russia and ukraine, and we are talking about the fact that these two countries can fire at each other. and just as he gives ukraine the right to fire or say that you can do it, you can do it the same way. this is russia yes, the meaning of his phrase is. yes, by the way, i'm just curious. did we ask him or something, huh? yours and your interpretation if the german defense minister and why then do you bring this data, why do you comment on his speech on german television? no, i'll explain why, but you understand the story, mister, no matter what contexts you bring to this, that what he said, he said it, but it depends. this is not about russia, how is it? well, of course. no. that i saw you took now one phrase there for an hour and a half of television. and that mr. kizivetr is sitting opposite,

other people are sitting opposite. you need to listen to this whole conversation. and then you'll understand it, otherwise it just looks like they just took it once chik-montage and said no. i did not do any editing, i specifically say. this is what the story is and is, if the story from this story follows that the minister of defense of the frg considers it normal for ukraine to strike at the territory of the russian federation, while he says that with some restrictions. do you understand? here the two cannot be interpreted. he said it's okay. this is literally said. it's normal to say when such blows are struck. by the way, i have a question. this is who said, the german minister of defense well, supply, by the way, ukraine through germany is happening. well, that's what he said, russia, but what does russia have to do with it? tell me. and why so far not a single echelon with leopards has been defeated, because if leopards do not exist on the territory of ukraine, i am where they

are not. and how do they get there. and how to explain to you alexander viktorovich i explain to you because you are engaged in, well , there are no false questions, i don’t deal with victims and you say alexander nikitin in turn for a second. alexander listen to me carefully. if you want to know the answer, i know, no, you don't know it. and maybe you know, but you probably don’t interpret any trains that lived in and other polish bases. with equipment in ukraine they do not go. this is completely false information. they ended up in ukraine once again. now. listen to me carefully. all this goes under the guise of passenger cars in trailers and other means of disguise , no echelons that go through the territory of ukraine and no one bombs them, they don’t exist. the legend of such patterns that russia does not

bombing is a ukrainian action. and you know where they come, then where they are unloaded. that's when they come with these echelons, there is a final destination general i have no servants in the order of attention and echelon. well, they come somewhere, i point out that they themselves said it, i say it again. no, you said on a separate train, covered with special boxes under the guise of passenger cars. all this is delivered by other means of disguise, about which you speak, i agree with you, but they are on the territory of ukraine well, no, funds arrive. well, that is, they, that is, they are unloading. they are somewhere they are then sent further. is that not the goal? no, wait, this is the goal and those that read,

listen carefully to his alexander some dude. this is what history says about russian territory. they are about ukrainian you, here are his russian phrases, which are actually not directed at russia russian territory with missiles this program. i told you about it. if you did not wait for this, well, at least in such a way as to correspond here is the question that he is asked. he will translate correctly from german . this is one question that comes in the context of the conversation on this question was this answer. i don't discuss. well, if you don’t discuss, then you don’t know

the truth, then well, let’s know, i don’t know the truth, i’m just saying what it really is, if you want to use only this one-sided perception and statement of the answer to this question. then you're right. and if you want to know the real truth, then listen to what i'm telling you. well, actually, it's wonderful. it's possible to go nuts, that he will tell us the real truth? no, not dear, the real truth, therefore, under this program, hmm, it means, i will start from the general, i will come to the private, which means from colombia, which means he is why the leadership of colombia made such a decision. i think, because we have worked practically have worked. we worked in africa, we work in latin america, if it worked in eastern europe, then the border should be it would be western europe, so we allowed, they insolently reached our borders now germany here they are such things. they say that they allow the goal, which means that the laws of another russia and then complain, he says, you know our internal affairs. uh, peskov

speaks out. yes, we never interfere in other people's affairs. he is right, but i say, in vain you should not interfere. you do not intervene themselves impudent. they think it's possible, so mr. need to be restored. you see, it is necessary to restore this most eastern europe on the border. that's when we start they won’t understand this thing, what does it mean, uh, they can’t consider that they saw germany lose, which means world war ii, two world wars, they spent. so now they will tell us. what are the purposes of laws? what goals are illegal and uh, that means ukraine. you know, here it was correctly said that what can be done. so, when hitler was, then, yes, they had the wehrmacht, people who wanted to save germany, they even drew a terrorist, they tried it didn’t work out. well, we must proceed from these mistakes, that how they did not managed to do. so some piece of uh the most to save ukraine well i want to say that i hope that this is an old whore

of the old state will help ukraine to maintain its existence or defeat russia but this is just nonsense. this is an illusion. and you understand this naivete, because the slavs in order to kill each other, this is the position of the anglo-protestants. they will finance this, spitting this fire with oil until you destroy all the last words to each other, and then say, well, sorry, it didn’t work out, but we all helped you that like you demanded a medal. well, they couldn’t, they couldn’t. sorry. sorry, i just heard a call for war with nato. you could paint over the restoration of the gdr. yes, this is a call to war. no, it's the people. yes people of germany they can call us here we should have several republics. they are calling the mordvinians from the coal games, rebelling against the russians are calling on the presidents of estonia for the millennium to this film menace festival. i'm just independent. i don’t

agree with maxim about the war with nato, so to speak, but i always thought and still think that the monkey way. well, it can be productive. well, yes, but they didn’t mirror ape, mirror ones, you understand? well, well, that's how it is, yes. well, i know that there are axes and the whole they really exist, by the way they point to well, to some strength of the project that stood behind the german democratic republic indeed. yes, in fact, but, uh , the whole history of this german people is somewhat wider than the period of division into the frg and the gdr is true. this is what i think is significant. is an essential uh cause uh, by the way, that's yesterday again touched must correct himself. i showed one piece. e from mr. um hmm kennedy robert here is where he talked about

how everything is right, but i can't really understand him yet, because he talked about how everything is wrong elsewhere. here i am, honestly, i still cannot work out my attitude to mr. robert kennedy. well , see for yourself the war in ukraine is a huge problem. for our country so from the geopolitical point of view. it accelerates the rapprochement between russia and china, which represents the worst outcome for us, but the question is why we are in ukraine because the austin secretary of defense said we are there to wear down the russian biden presidents, said we are there to overthrow vladimir putin if that is why we are here killing. ukrainians as footmen in a mediated war between two great powers, then here's one last thing. no one talks about it, 14,000 ukrainian civilians died there, but 300,000 military personnel died there

, russians kill ukrainians in a ratio of seven to one to eight to one they can no longer resist this what we are told about this war. it is not true. so, yes, and yesterday he told me what a fine fellow his son was, that he was in the foreign legion there, but he was not quite, it turns out, well done, this is called the nato war with russia she admits, says austin, says we are in ukraine to means to deplete russia biden , he says, we began to show that this means that they are anatoly, i’m on the right standing, who says that i call for war with nato now. this statement can be considered that they call for a war with russia, they practically participate, they do not call, they do it at all. they are waging it. so, what's real, honestly, they're just kind of like you have this, you know, strange rapport. yes, the americans do not call. they would often participate in this full growth just indirectly so far. er, so

to speak, they don't want to confirm the fact. the participation of the united states of america directly, but they, at least, manage all these processes, starting from at least since 2014. since the moment of the coup, they have fully institutionalized entered ukraine and rule there. eh, all these processes. something else is very important here. here. i think that for the ukrainian side. here is this speech in relation. especially the dead is you know it, well actually. i thought it would just cause a lot of people to go, because until now, first a special military operation. this information. not only is it secret and very often they try to manipulate not always. lucky how is it did reznikov comparing with those killed in the earthquake in turkey trying to say what really. well, not many of us have died yet. in fact, our regime still has a huge potential. we are ready

to continue to do this. that is, you know, to tell the truth, how many people died and how many more? dies as a result of this counteroffensive, which they are preparing , will it or will not, but in some form. and by the way, in some video it is already on, yes, judging by the condition, it has been at least the third day already. we don't understand yet where they are, by the way, yesterday in public. i don't remember someone from uh, the ministry of defense said, we will not name any dates or directions in contrast, but it will be, but it will be. for example, it is difficult for me to imagine how this can be done in practice, if the active phase of hostilities unfolds, yes, well, let's assume the direction of kherson or zaporozhye there. well, i think it will be absolutely obvious. you can tell me about this, where it will be, but i want to emphasize once again that there is an understanding of that. we very often we discuss americans, we believe that they are so hard-nosed. they've rested all to the last ukrainians. they are sincere, as they say, americans

in general, they never say anything sincerely. they understand everything perfectly. i'm not inclined to think. they are also sitting there, all idiots, but in fact they understand what the outcome of the war will be, but the americans are not interested in me, because i have already told them at least 5-6 options for getting out of this situation, how they will get out of this case, and i think they will find a way out, maybe even in disgrace, but exit without loss. and here's what will happen to ukrainians to do. here's what ukraine is doing next, and what europe will look like well , which has contracted for this american project, and you know when we are told, we should do business with europe. yes, we don't mind. well, they always stand in a pose, as if they want to drink some water from a stream. we are not eyes, we do not see emotions. well, that's how you can understand what europe wants why europe doesn't want if we see only sirloin places, because we don't see anything. we do not communicate directly with them. so you know now, after the tour of er lavrov in latin

america, we see a completely new result. yes, and now i think that we need to continue this tour around the world. so the arab world must be said, and i must say something about southeast asia that needs to be strengthened. it means vietnam there and so on, our position, because the americans now want their opposition efforts around china, and the japanese, they are all involved there, which means the australians and we must step up our positions in southeast asia in the middle east, that is, the arab world or we'll see that all this europe is just noisy, capricious, bitchy woman for the covers of such a civilization. you see, you know that there will be screaming arrests and so on, but the whole world process will go on without them, and they know about it, so they are panicking at protestant europe, not sorry, how sour. for example, the ad immediately after it is true. hello natasha. that's the meeting.

you look great. premiere on the channel russia wedding, your brother will not last long. kolya do not leave me at 21:20 on the russia channel where she pays for purchases not only conveniently pay fast payment system without getting up from the couch. benefit has never been so convenient. pay for your purchases with a button and get rustic or for the price of one opt for fruit-based pills. try berries just one at night for

comfortable morning relief and bloating. you have everything now don't forget all the seeds from martin , i can buy one for 600 rubles. by check, collect a collection of unique coins and win prizes for an airplane with pyaterochka meet a new card for life from vtb share free transfers and catch 1,000 rubles with your feelings. after the first purchase. get a new card for life on vtb.ru. the first thing

for those who are important to be the first to share, fresh cats who are important. suddenly, euphoria showed us its true face. we do not need to look at the same screen to be on the same wavelength, what we spent on. i would earn money and it is not necessary to always be at home to feel like hosts. how gloves change

you, how people change no one knows how we will change more and what awaits us around the corner. what is this new logo? mts yes, but that one, that one whether you already have the same loan, compare will help you find out for sure. check your credit raid, apply and find out which bank will approve a loan on the best terms on compare if a loan then in the application compare moscow coffee house on paydays, a combination of tradition and cutting-edge technology of the highest class. a taste of pleasure, buy a smartphone. technopark

bonus video 30 years. pay less bar of the amount and new sneakers are equivalent. we watch to know everything about russia the best historical series, we watch for free without registering or on the website, the whole world is worried about the events around the kiev pechersk lavra, forgetting how holy this place is for everyone in our studio the incredible story

of the real miracles of the kiev-pechersk lavra, and what prophecy zosima made 30 years ago, which had already begun strongly predicted about falling lamp. remind me you know, according to the theologian , you tore off the cross, and the live broadcast of the premier immediately drops at 16:30. this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1, we continue our discussion. well, this week, of course, janet helen is significant and we discussed this through the fact that the dollar will either collapse or not, but so far everything is going fine, so to speak, from the twelfth floor to the sixth. eh, for now, everything seems to be fine, but uh, she also allowed herself to talk about the requirements in relation. at the same time , china said that she would definitely come there when the situation was good. so

by the way, i wonder, she's such a thing. we discussed this with a gay this morning in a program on radio solovyov, it’s interesting, look at the biden, he says, well, when will it turn out situation, then i will definitely sit. you 'll talk to us, blinky says when he folds. actually. well, then i couldn’t stand it anymore, you say, damn it, the movie we are with this, which at one time lies, we talk. vat, we're not going to, now eling. and what's going on with a little power? well, in principle, if a gay man wants to talk to someone, then the other side should happily run towards him. and yes, talk in general. and then something the situation does not add up. well, not surprising. why look at china's helena chinas his support for russia is alarming evidence that he is not serious about ending the war. it is imperative that china and other countries do not

provide russia with material support or assistance in circumventing sanctions. we will continue to make the position of the united states of beijing and companies located as clear as possible. under his jurisdiction, the consequences of any violations will be the most severe, as in the case of national security. we will not compromise on the protection of human rights, this principle is at the heart of how we interact with the outside world. world i saw with my own eyes that the government of the people's republic of china, it has introduced technology to reduce the chinese people and control the technology that we are currently exporting to dozens of countries. violations of human rights violate the moral code of the whole world, they also violate the auto-wielding principles of the united nations, which are signed by almost all countries

, including china the united states continues to use our tools to stop human rights violations wherever they occur around the globe, but a fossil. well, very briefly answered the representative of china ivan russia has always adhered to the principles of not joining nick frontation and not targeting a new type of relations between large countries, based on mutual respect for the peaceful existence of cooperation. this is fundamentally different from the small closed circles and bloc confrontations that the us is engaged in. no state has the right to interfere with the russian federation and the prc. i would like to ask a question. but when elin, and who is she that's who she is. here she is about human rights there about the fact that the united states will be there. who

is she, as far as i know, deals with finance, and in one part of her speech. she said that we would need to interact with china somehow. she says that if you have to break it, it will be bad for everyone. no, but the fact is that at first she says that we need to interact with china. we cannot solve certain issues without china. well, either bad, maybe, and then just this castle, which she is made of sand i built it with my own hand and smashed it, saying that you know that we will put pressure on you with human rights to use it there, then everyone in xinjiang is there too. eh, you and whatever you want, and we'll give you e, that means all the most interesting. she says in china that you shouldn't help uh bypass the sanctions, i wonder when they are those sanctions that they imposed against. from china, they will forbid china to bypass them too. you must not bypass. you must not bypass. how do you circumvent our sanctions scoundrel. well, it's simple. well, it's true you said, fossils, really

monster fossils. this is a rarity relic from a past era. here is a scary relic that she herself believes in what i will tell you. you will agree with me does not believe. she is by no means. you just took it off my tongue. because there is such a people's people's broker sign, if a financier starts talking about morality and ethics, then in the financial of this education, obviously kirdyk comes, because this is, as we used to say, patriotism is the last one who adheres to the villain of morality with the ethics of human rights. last the financiers of the case, there, indeed, very much to the bride, by the way, they didn’t talk about the united states themselves. yes, they meant exactly the opposite , they interpreted something there. we have everything right. that's because the author of this statement meant that even a complete scoundrel in the ideology of patriotism. maybe, e, to find a renewed living human essence

, something yes, what did the author say, something can be found in this situation this is not the point. well, if they are financiers, and janet yelling is a financier, believe me, it is of a very high class, it really is. so it's great specialists, but the situation does not just go by itself. here we are, however. on the last program , we talked about the worst thing that could happen, er, to the economy and to the managers who run the economy. they lost control, they really lost control. they do not see any movement of funds. now they are talking about discounts on russian oil, but they do not see the part that is not in dollars. and this is the situation when reality is creeping under your feet , it makes you weave the most incredible statements about human rights. er, have to do with the us dollar by about? well, i don't know which one. and the whole point is what they stop exporting. e your inflation in china, that's the trouble. you know, i see the meaning much

easier. here you are her statements and in this idiotic dualism you understand what 's the matter, and this statement is a political framework for what europe will force to do . we appreciate economically, in general , the threat of a crisis. maybe, but values above europe, your values ​​​​are above or below so that you were above quickly breaking off economic relations with china on the run. you must prove that you have values ​​above that you will not prove to be flogged. this is what will happen. look at what will happen in the near future. america will not break soon. well god you're not. after europe, america will break off relations, and then, if it does, and the first one to defend the values ​​of human rights and so on will send europe yes, we didn’t

agree with dim with your phrase that i’m tired of a fossil from a past era, just it is from a new era in a past era, american leaders did not have this, whether they were healthy or not, healthy cynicism. there was real politics, knowing what goals they had to achieve. they could turn a blind eye to some of their ideological values, and therefore supported pinochi himself , this is the south korean dictatorship. given that, what about dictatorships, but if they are so correct, well, in general, uh, then south korea should have been criticized, and i can criticize a lot of tough and i can example result in the end precisely because they showed this cynicism and pragmatism. they won the cold war and brought down the warsaw pact. soviet union and now it's a new era that shows. how the american elite has changed now the ideology

is above all, and they even the chinese could offer some kind of deal, for example, we turn a blind eye to everything that the gays have listed on you to take on and the persecution of the opposition. but you will help us to crush russia. but this head doesn’t come to them, so today’s only in to some extent, for the kremlin , easier opponents are more convenient than tamika egon for the soviets. it's just not that they are such idiots and ideological is an ass on them. in fact, they press, no, they don’t give, they don’t give, but they understand that it’s impossible to agree, that the price of a deal from china will be tantamount to subordinating america to china they understand this, and they don’t want to make any deal with china, any deal america from china is strategic american . i'm

talking about the fundamental situation in this i mean, they're certainly not idiots. they hide behind these bugs, trying to close the real problem of not ability. e behave from a position of strength. how are they used to doing it? thank you for talking. in the past in the past particular. they called from berlin assigned another military. yes? got it okay? ok then. by the way, i don’t get confused in modern german titles, and in no case should you pronounce the old ones, but very briefly. i don’t know if the information was passed here, but, in my opinion, it was already passed somewhere that two leopard tanks became less of those who were supposed to go to ukraine in poland trained there with the ukrainian military, we spoke here, but we have already said. in general, i already have nothing to say, except for two towers, but no, but this is not a joke. they write about it. by the way, they write a lot about this, because the question of the ability of the german military and the ukrainian military to very

quickly transfer to this equipment and work with this equipment concerns not only tanks, but also just this conversation about possible deliveries of aircraft, therefore, in including germans and history say no euro-fighters and tornados are not even on the agenda at all . do you understand what's the matter? and why am i? well, maybe there is something wider in the context, why? i argued with you, because in general this is the whole history of the german position. well, including measures, yes , which for some reason said to herself that i was not accidental, that i was lying, there, and so on and so forth. yes, this whole history of german promises and their consistent rejection makes me take the position that i am taking, because here is from merkil to in order to put helmets and bandages here, and now they say that they will never put planes. well, why should we believe? here in this or about the fact that fear zimmerman

says that she decided that the german soldiers will never live out their last days in the bundestag, she intends to move to the european parliament. and there he will lead a group of liberals, of course, that's why i have a question. why should i believe him? i prefer to proceed from the fact that you should not believe. i am very offended. for uh, the relationship of the west. generally to ukraine, even today's ukraine yes , zelensky and the authorities are on my side, but to ukraine why are they treated like this, see didn't have time? he says something that ukraine is all members of nato according to the fact that ukraine will be in nato as a correct story, i agree with you said, wait. wait 10 years for an opportunity and so on there wake up hype. i just said espresso learned. i just learned orbán's question from the press. what, yes, what is pressure, this is stoltenberg, yes, what does he say?

i just pictured learned refuses, that i gave no consent. well read, no agreement. you see, here is germany against. i tell her against. here it is pouring. and what's bad is that no responsibility. this table, this one, will not carry it. he will be lying tomorrow the day after tomorrow. well, this is a monster of a smaller aba. but the fact that kenady, i literally thesis is that the shadow sanatorium called the numbers. i doubt 300,000 killed. but even if we are talking about the fact that these are 300,000 losses of ukraine, the total is common. yes? this is 300,000 healthy men who they could raise the economy of ukraine , a family could live, they went to planting, you understand, that is, these are these two moments, right? we are deceived by the europeans of nato, and the americans themselves tell us what we got to. i would like the ukrainians to wake up today, just right now alexey well, by the way, what jennet elena said is

very interesting, because you need to bring it all in. there are some such, you know, indicative. e work at history departments, journalism departments and udov students, because this should be shown in one text. well, i absolutely agree , at first she called for peace with china, then immediately threatened, then a paragraph. i believe that i promised to punish everyone, so to speak, both personally and by the international community, but did not allow anyone to interfere in american affairs. in general, this is, as it were, the standard of what they will do. the funniest thing. that's all. and that's what she wrote there. she didn't write it. she wrote a text. she might even be somewhere inside there and wondered what they would do. the only thing. can colleagues i bet. in my opinion. this is a very weak financier, because she could stop everything that bernanke started up to the amount of easing. that's when it came. here's how a drug addict has already got the final on personal mitigation a lot of money and she didn't make the country get off of him. you are still doing this. this thesis about a strong financier requires clarification within the framework of the discussion . i agree, by the way,

the government does not necessarily require dima to understand now, but the situation there is extremely simple, i continue then. they can't practice, uh reduction in quantitative easing bias. they fly in the bank because of this, because most of them took off. and when this is just the beginning, this is just the beginning, but the fact is that the main reserves of government securities, and government securities at a completely different percentage, i exaggerate with the discount rate, then there are very big troubles right away, so once again there is a reality here is economic financial reality spreads like a wet rag. here you can imagine this sex, that's all the steps. here i am i would like to correct my colleagues for all the steps they are taking. these steps are forced. this is how chess is. box. they can't do it any other way. i'm here with you. i talked about it, but you're good. now i have formulated reality, creeping without a metaphor, crawling, it’s not clear what to do with it, holes have to be plugged with an ideological second, this is what he was talking about,

maxim is just a couple of words after all, here. uh, i was very touched by your dispute over the statement of the minister of defense of germany. i'm a little on the other side. i would like it take a look. you know, what hurts me is that the german defense minister has no right to say such things about russia , he has no moral right to say it to me. this has always hurt german journalists and politicians and so on. and the further they allow themselves to do this more and more often , you understand, they historically do not have the right to pronounce this. it’s just that here it’s not even a matter of context, nor in some kind of it, it just should be a taboo for them, as in some other issues. how about the holocaust and so on. you must be gay right, but why didn't i appeal to this? you know, because i'm into everything . they see abandoned it, yes schultz said we have the right. oh so you

are right then you will be responsible for it. if you think you have the right to forget. uh, the great patriotic war and 28 of ours he raised our dead, then you will answer. for this right - it is always a responsibility. so they also acquired responsibility, so i didn’t just operate on morality. that's all right now, watch the program to conduct and see you. on the russia vesti tv channel in the evgeny rozhkov studio