see you good afternoon. this is a program, who is against on channel russia 1 and in the studio, dmitry kulikov is released, artyomovsk, he will also bang the flag of russia, hoisted over the city, many thanks to everyone who fought in this battle and the wagner assault detachment and the entire unit of the armed forces that acted there honor and words to our heroes. yes , the summit jessive approved plans for further struggle with russia and recognized china as

the main threat to the world. in the same place in hiroshima biden. heard zelensky and publicly approved the plan of the ukrainian offensive in europe all together, as if on command, they are calling for the supply of fighters at 16 in ukraine. although they counted yesterday. this is impossible, with the question subsequently of such a decision by the european leaders. it is not discussed, and the consequences will invariably come not only for the europeans, but also for the anglo-saxons hiding behind them in accordance with the new foreign policy concept of russia in which this term appeared. here is what he said about it at a meeting of the assembly of the council on foreign defense policy of the minister of foreign affairs of russia sergey lavrov the form that it developed in our foreign policy until

recently has completely exhausted itself, and we have also entered a phase of the most acute confrontation with the aggressive bloc within the united states, the european union and the north atlantic alliance, the task has been set loudly and openly to defeat russia on the battlefield. but do not stop there, but eliminate it as a geopolitical competitor to the western expert community. the number is already openly discussed, the order received for the development of scenarios for the dismemberment of our country and not it is hidden that the existence of russia as an independent center is incompatible with achieving the goal of the global dominance of the west well, within the framework of the west itself, it is clear that they dominate. uh, the united states in our new concept of foreign policy. we have used a term that is well

known to everyone anglo-saxon until now in doctrinal documents. uh, not used, but it reflects what the anglo-saxon world is. e, subjugated, well, first of all, the whole of continental europe, despite timid attempts, uh, individual politicians from time to time time to recall the task of the strategic autonomy of the european union but the trail of continental europe and the rest of the so-called collective west, including the countries that are located in the southeastern part of the asian continent and for all of us, a new reality has come. this, as i said, is also reflected in the end of foreign policy, if we take trends. that what is happening now around ukraine, of course, is accelerating the transition to a multipolar system

of international relations. well, this is the public part of the minister's speech. foreign affairs. i talked to many participants, i couldn't go there myself to participate, but i spoke to many participants of this event. here is the non-public part, which was discussed and how it was discussed, in principle, by many of our political experts who were there. er, well, the event was very well received. well, not in the sense of the event. and in the sense of the content yes of what was discussed there, and the concept of civilizational e, the essence of our country of our people. here is absolutely dominant, as well as the realization that e with west and really entered into a very long history of showdown and confrontation. not by our will, but by circumstances. this statement is probably extremely important. here are the representatives of liberal

circles, or e. here is the so-called party of the world, which, uh, believe that at some point you can stop looking, how would everything come on, come on, let's stop here. yes, that is, now let's give way to you somewhere . and we will continue to live as before. let's go to milan. we will visit london. that is, we continue to live. well we’ll quickly settle things right now, smooth our hair here, and everything will work out. here and in gs7. and and here, uh at the meeting, but one simple thing is being said. there are two options for the exit, either we have them or they have us, that is, there is another option. it is not envisaged anywhere, it is simply not envisaged, that is, the united states is today gathering the g7 as an organization not a platform for negotiations. they are not going to negotiate with anyone there. that is, just as they really wanted it to be so, that is. well, not yet. there is china and russia and all other sites. they are reforging under a single propaganda platform, that is, which is simple. they begin to brand russia and china. these are the main

enemies against which we must move. today, however, scholz spoke out in this path. he said he says when ukraine wins. we will continue to arm her. that's where it's interesting for you, or there we'll move on to you. well, since i will touch on that topic. oh, rodion, i want to be here. it goes in the context, of course i do. that's why i support what they said, there is a curious thing. here a crook, he said, then several more leaders said, then after the victory, and by the way, the western press writes a concept , you know what they are preparing for you instead of nato, they didn’t see the concept is very simple, it’s called the ukraine of the new israel you must be so, but you knew, means, there, that sets out no entry. nato will not. yes, forget this, here, and the shipment of the most modern first-class weapons, the preparation of the army, so that you continue er. gibli en masse, this is what the west is considering and this is

a real plan that they want to implement, understand? here i am, in principle, in tune with ukraine wanted to be israel. here they are offering no nato any guarantees, only the supply of weapons. you die on the battlefield. now, for the sake of it, confirmation will end that no peace agreements will end now, even if they end, they will be walls in the concept of total destruction, and alternatives in the form of russia in the face. china, that is, in any case, yes, that is, ukraine, that is, in this studio. vasil must remember or in another studio. that's a few years ago. we we say you have to be crazy in order to want to start a war in your country. just let them into your yard and tell the guys that you are all fighting here. yes, now you are enjoying it. today you have already taken a sip, you have not yet fully felt anything, not fully felt the puddle. what is the war in your yard, so now we must clearly understand, or we gathered all our strength and transferred

proved our right to exist. here , either us or us necessarily, or us necessarily. ah, that is, forced to exist in the world according to the rules, the one which they are supposed to for well, who actively impose it, ukraine well, according to the rules of the world, by the way, shamelessly. i said, biden, there were two events, but there was not much else that was funny. if we have time, we 'll talk about funny things. and now, as it were, in fact. here's biden, u said at a press conference about what american leadership is. once again, how important it is that america's global leadership is presumptuous on the part of the american president. but i think if you ask one of our colleagues, you will understand that the security and prosperity of the american people is greatly enhanced by working together with our closest allies and partners to build future economic strength , resilience, and a better known and more stable world, and on many of the issues

that matter to the american people. accelerating the transition to clean energy preventing another pandemic fighting china protecting ukraine the meetings i had with my fellow g7 leaders made us more united more determined determined to make great progress in the coming months. well, that's so cool. everything is for the welfare of the american people. here, as it were, it was approved; all the rest signed up, mind you, the defense of ukraine and the fight against china directly. uh, it says there, and the second is yours. and so i would pay attention, biden, you deserved zelensky, something happened and biden's public statement that, well, i checked all the plans. they are good all set f-16. now it is not necessary for this. here we hope that at the very soon. we are sure that even in this the offensive of ukraine will begin, because

ukraine must justify our hopes close to the text. well, agree. i conveyed exactly what biden said, so the printing of the offensive plan that zelensky biden brought. or rather, the text. biden, put a public seal, biden, i affirm, so, by and large, the president of france managed to lead the inclination forward. uh, on board zelensky in japan to lead , not only is he successful, the only thing he doesn’t i managed to meet e zelensky with the president of brazil and that's how it all turned out. i'm what because it's really a success in some way for me. uh, the politicians of france are precisely and these are not just words, look further what you said, dear presenter, yes, we all saw what the bideno said. for me. this grief is a tragedy for me personally. i just didn't see it. uh, zelensky wasn't there. there was a biden

who said he missed, who spoke about the troops, who spoke about the plans, who said it would be that's how it will be, a here is the role of zelensky in this, after all. he is still president for some part of ukraine. i don't understand the video at all. i don't understand the movie famous. why did he go there? it was possible not to go, it was possible simply not so much. uh, let's say look. eh, well, it's just nothing to me. here he is, like a man, generally sailed away somewhere. there was a cloud, but what was there, besides the cloud, there was a very good photo and yermak posted where he was sitting, presidents biden, zelensky and the ukrainian and american and american delegations from left to right, the head of administration and mr. saleva were there, and it was sullivan who later explained what would happen and what would happen next with ukraine and let's see, and then you will continue, firstly, about crimea, yes,

yes, the ukrainians got the opportunity to strike at russian celeb. do you think that crimea is part of ukraine, of course, crimea is ukraine, this is an obvious thing. do you think that ukraine should have weapons that can reach russian targets in crimea yes, we have placed restrictions on ukraine being able to strike at their territories within internationally recognized borders? we said that we did not allow ukraine with the help of american systems of western systems, this is telling russia well, he said three times that he would. i want to convey here. hello, some of our some of our people here, who argued, by the way, where did you go, blinkina? all in all, he was interesting. why do i say he was, but mind you. yes, no, well, not medina, he was

absolutely invisible. yes, it's already been three weeks since the zaluzhno zaluzhno disappeared and the pancake, swarming on the day he got it, but public statements. no damn, the movie says it all. lebanon well, mind you , sullivan says the same thing that he said, damn it, and now, probably, the speech that you have in mind, i will also show. our approach to providing weapons materials to train ukrainians met the needs of the conflict so during the first phase, when russian troops were advancing on kiev, the main thing that the ukrainians needed was stingers and javelins, we provided them during the second phase, when there was more ground fighting in the donbass needed there was artillery and 155-mm shells for the m-77 howitzer. as the struggle evolved, so did the opportunities we gave ukraine and what the president really had in mind in february. this is where we are.

in the midst of a massive effort to provide ukraine with everything it needs to launch a counter-offensive this summer and that was everything from tanks to bradley hymers infantry fighting vehicles, artillery ammunition and other f-16 capabilities are not part of this kit and the president made it clear that for the purposes of this counter-offensive on f-16 compared to everything else what i said was not in charge list, but now that we have delivered everything we promised and put the ukrainians in a position to make progress on the battlefield in a counter-offensive. we have reached a point where it is time to look ahead and ask what ukraine needs as part of a future force to deter and defend against russian aggression as we move forward. so here's the escalation. yes, look here, how interesting. here is what he asks, zelensky asks and begs. let's forget. just. yes, there is

an american plan, yes. uh, so there is a plan a phased escalation in which the united states should remain as much as possible, we talked about this more than a year ago in april in this suga of last year. we talked about this, that there are american plans to stay in the back rows as long as possible, preferably some even behind the scenes to take such actions to draw everyone else into the conflict and while they are achieving this plan, because everyone else seems to want. thank you very much what you showed because for me it was a photograph that you mentioned. i can also show it found by the editor. wow. here is that photo. yes, the delegation is sitting here. yes, here are the people who make the decision explain. how does e make a decision, explain the interpretation of the sneakers, which are still publicly and there is a performer on the left? yes,

here, which are here. you see, someone is hiding his head, someone is a performer somewhere. i mean, the ukrainian delegation, which cannot even say there is, because. well, what else to tell them, they only have to carry out now further. this is unfortunately for me. tragedy. why because when salim he said summer would be contraception? i don’t know when the summer is the first of june, the summer is june 20, i don’t know, but it will be but the second one in ukraine for a long time, instead of the president’s office , the concept of military country is being considered, and what will happen to ukraine then, that is, yes, it should be armed to the teeth. i just thought armed how like finland , how who it turned out that the paw opens just like israel and now look dmitry, you understand that there is noise now, ukraine is not in nato ukraine in nato what he said no no no no, yes, no need for ukraine in nato let 's not let the american plan, because there are no formal agreements between the us and israel that, uh, israel is not a nato member. it's just that there is an agreement that is being fulfilled by the supply of weapons, technologies, and

so on. in principle, there is, there is one difference, only one question, there is one difference, yes ukraine is not israel and so, and so everything is everything else you are right, but i wanted to say. and how many people, how many people are ukrainians will remain in this area. and on what territory in order to serve everything that concerns everything? the latest data that has now passed is that there are no more than 18 million left on the territory of ukraine, but the current controlled 18 and i think that this is very very plausible. and when biden says, how many russians died near bakhmut, i listened carefully. i wanted to say something, but so many ukrainians died, he told me. how many princes is correct. yes , he can't tell me. yes, bid-biden, indeed. he only said. uh, if one a small moment even for such a large number of troops in general for the entire period. it was not from the russian side. i understand that i

just wanted to say that my father could probably say, but so many ukrainians died and i am not the president of the united states directly responsible for the deaths of these people yet. why is it that president biden will be directly responsible for your stupidity. you agree to give the command. no, wait, he gives a command, you accept them and carry them out , and you did it, cheerfully you asked for this position. good plan about equating ukraine with israel well, in addition to what you said, there is another very big problem. we need to find as many more jews in ukraine who will work, like those jews who worked when they created the state, israel. i want to remind you that the state of israel was created not only with the ionic idea. and after the end of world war ii. it was created as a place where they could, where jews could find refuge for themselves ukraine ukraine has none of this, so it’s even stupid to say that someone will equate it. i think that the first who will rise up against this israel is because in this way there is a glorification of the holocaust and

there will be an attempt to equate completely different and completely different serious things. discuss. yes, you have the right to discuss it. i don't argue. now. i want to emphasize how i feel about this, you know, when the rabbits mated, you don’t understand, they are stupidly bred. yes, yes, but this is a stupid divorce. how to tell ukraine what it should check, well, continue to die? yes will be like in israel ah. wait like they said before it will be like in europe not like in europe it won't be like no it won't be like that. here you will have both at the same time and as in europe and as in israel in general, everything you will have is dying. here the question is simply that it is going on in this way, but you understand that there is a belittling of the helm of what was in exchange for the current situation. i think that , firstly, israel will object to this. and secondly, i do not agree at all with the fact that the americans gave everything to israel american.

eh, the israeli powerful technological scientific base gave the americans a lot to create, including weapons, so here we are talking about the fact that the americans directly gave everything to the israelis. this is not so at all, moreover, and moreover, what is happening today in ukraine and the fact that today they are trying to pull up some schemes to this. and here's how we can do it. in order not to enter into nato, but to give ukraine this, perhaps it is silly to talk about this topic, because we are not talking about ukraine now. if you listen to those today the words that you said showed biden and those who spoke there, then we are talking about that war about the war of support, the stubbornness of wartime, and it is clear that ukraine simply does not exist in this at all, who will speak in the foreground. we don’t know yet, maybe they even want to go through with fire and sword and think that now it will end and we’ll go further. here the far east means, here, look about israel, that you seriously took it apart. that's right. it needs to be sorted out, but it's redundant.

attitude to this situation, because it's just cheese on a leash, well, which he was the european union you europeans of europe uh, the civilization of civilization. this is another cheese. here, uh, and here, if you look at the plan, it's real, about which the king speaks. yes, as in stages, they pulled in. uh, because america really set it like that. first , really those javelins, and then let's drag everyone. yes, then it means guns and maxillaries and let's drag everyone with tanks, schulz, they generally boarded. and what, what does not ask where the abrams are, what is it keep quiet? here the scenario cannot be about f-16. i see the following scenario, you understand, they are preparing for the next stage. well, based on the fact that counter will not bring us anything here.

and the next stage is in such a moment that it is necessary to involve , well, at least polyakov in this whole story, how to involve should be combined with two airfields - it’s impossible to place in ukraine for xvi it’s impossible, where will we be in poland here, let’s two in one bottle let's make more entry into the war. don't don't don't on your own. she goes to help herself its decision and the location of airfields. it's only because of one in romania to finish the debt. yes, sasha. only in such a scenario, one can really talk about the allocation of f-16s and they need to be deployed somewhere, but on the territories that the ukrainian regime controls, this is, well, nonsense. yes, therefore, they will corrode more and more from you for the war. i think so, i don’t understand, if ukrainian aviation is stationed there, which periodically says a genius beats these planes there, why are there f-16s on the territory?

uh, look, it's one thing that they have an mig-29 left there with production lines for their maintenance, and it's quite another to create production lines. in this service at 16 on these same airfields it is completely different so, at least experts tell me who er. well, it looks like they figure it out for me. i say again, i am not an expert in aviation, especially military aviation, but more than once, so to speak, there is an opinion that squadrons should be based. well, it's impossible there. well, either they will fly in, well, how would they take off from there, but then fly away to hide in poland, allegedly actively carried out, and it seems very doubtful to me, because the poles perfectly understand how it will end? and they don’t need to order it in general, we’ll see, we’ll see, yes, that is, one more thought was voiced, with which i, uh, would like to argue.

and that this confrontation in russia and the west , uh, will necessarily end in someone's victory, or they are us or we are not at all, because it is impossible to defeat a nuclear power and there is no need to draw analogies with the first and second world a war that ended in unconditional surrender. a a. it is impossible to defeat russia on one of the sides, but on the other hand , it is impossible to defeat our opponents, who also held a nuclear one. therefore, sooner or later , we will still have to agree on developing a new security architecture. part of this security architecture will probably be. and the very idea that ukraine will not be a member of nato and show me a man in moscow who would not be satisfied with this. now, as for the summit in keroseme, what am i paid attention this west, which sergey viktorovich lavrov spoke about, is not

so unified, but it seemed to me, because on the one hand there was a european approach. hmm , its essence boils down to making this summit and the policy of the collective west as centric as possible for ukraine. please note that zelensky a flew there on the plane of the french presidents. then i read already now interesting materials in the french press. how exactly french diplomacy and not at all under pressure from the americans. it was their initiative, their idea, and they didn’t push through everyone, starting from the saudis, where the intermediate landing, as we remember zelensky made, and ending with the japanese and all other europeans. about now we have integrated into this french stream and pay attention that it was the europeans who made the most radical statement about the f-16 aircraft, and on the other hand, we see the approach that was personified by the united states and the host of the summit, japan, and this is just, uh, the essence

approach is to make a-a summit as chinese-centric as possible, that is, anti-chinese. and here. eh, let's just reverse note that the europeans were very reluctant to sign the anti-chinese clauses of the joint statement. somewhere. they were able to soften them up. the press also writes about this about the f-16. still, americans are more likely to speak out. well, yes, let the europeans supply their planes, well, somehow, such a frenzied enthusiasm, as from the words of e, joseph bayle and the leader of european states we do not see, therefore, i am such a trend. yes , uh, 16, interesting. you see, uh, the decision on the supply of 16 is still made by the americans. nobody else. this is their plane. no one else can make the decision to commit the f-16 to combat. this must be accepted by the americans. here, and the barrel and the europeans are happy. let's go americans. take it

at 16. from there, from norway, where you can single out, but our typhoons. uh, these same rafa or that's it. everything else, they will not be involved. this is already we sort of decided that the americans are your move come in and can’t do it without fanaticism, calmly according to the residual principle, it’s possible. it doesn't matter, i just americans have to accept about it. decision and it will be difficult to hide here. yes , it will be difficult for the americans to personally accept. this decision is not for someone else p16, here, and about the european whole thing, i was pleased with bernard e, audrey levy. here is an outstanding person who is involved in all conflicts in all bloodshed and the culprit of many of them. here he comes up with a clever idea. but what if zelensky's zaluzhny's strategy for bakhmat is

to get out of the city in order to better return it back, in other words , an inverted trojan horse. i believe that this is some kind of never let ukraine continue, let it be that you are brilliant , in all this information war, the combination of the fall of artyom and the liberation of artyomanov’s made worthy five kopecks and henri levy has been known for a long time e extremely critical statements regarding russia since the time of the chechen companies in the nineties. and, that is, this is another idea. yes, although well, yes , it is believed that there is a major postmodern philosopher, everything, just one to the other, apparently, and does not interfere. what about this summit? it really struck me. well, firstly, this uh, some kind of uh, childish , you can say scandal with the president of brazil and ukraine, who was supposed to meet with whom,

who refused someone? yes, and zelensky seems to be hinting that the brazilian did not come to the brazilians. they say that the end has not come, and here, in fact, there may be an answer. well , uh, all the questions that vasily rightly asks, uh, during all these months. he gave the best answer. uh, the president of brazil he said that zelensky is an adult . do and let him answer. by the way, i i never understood that maxim said that the french press is so actively talking about how france is actively weslayselen. excuse me. e question well, what for france was, you know, what for actually, there i read that it led almost to the organizational collapse of the japanese. i will kept this article japanese. i, too, since when kishida met with zelensky, just on the day when

the zenpin was sitting, he was in moscow, and someone said that zelensky would be online everything, there he was shielded for him in the speech section and enough, but you also need to understand that there are seven leaders of the seven plus, invited about 15, presidents, who need to be in a couple of days so that everyone is somehow with each other on a version. well, on the one hand, the macron decided to show that here he decides something, and he carries it because. well, on the other hand, what else can he fly zelensky through, wait for the american in 2016, but you bombed it yourself, maxim, you read it in detail. can you explain i can say why, france samsung was the most detailed figaro and based on conversations, well, with someone from the staff. e administration of the president of france further. why did you buy it? but i'm selling. don't scream.

i’m quoting them. hmm, that means their justification, firstly, and france thus stands out among all europeans as the main lobbyist of ukraine. and secondly, security problems are being solved, because france is a nuclear power and has made something official french aircraft. well, it's not possible. this is already a serious conflict , this is the problem a and b i well, in general , further technical points are already there, like i criticize, but the explanation is quite completely dull. yes? you are probably not used to me criticizing macron, but in this case, read it when i read his tweet. i really didn't like it. how to say, excessive emotionality, that is, here it is, but, unfortunately, my big one dropped somewhere to the level of anna lena berg because there were such solid

slugs, and i generally hate tweets, because they show squalor in general here of the present times and finish - that is, a few slogans and in the end, but for the victory of ukraine, then there is, yes, still somehow here more caution yes, yes, comrade short version comrades. i did your job, of course macron. that's all. now a second, i did not understand, why comrade si? zelensky's explanation that because of france i am fulfilling the agreement. the e that was reached between the cdpinion, and the macron. here, in kind, here the macron takes zelensky and says, you see, i am carrying out our peacekeeping mission with you. why well , not exactly a combo story, of course, of course yes, the whole summit was opposed to china, that's how it went. sorry in japan yes one of the most important countries

of the anti-chinese coalition now, of course for france well, i think that for mr. macron it was somewhat critical, but again, signing with all these belts, you can and so on, please, what did you interrupt? of course i saw it. i've seen china's official statement here, which is very tough and very in this sense, extremely anti-jezevan. this is a body, and the country france - separately well, of course, yes, i didn’t interrupt the agenda, if you interrupt why does china need a powerful, well-thought-out systemic statement, how does it relate to the eccentrics gathered there, because it was a big summit at which a lot of declarative anti-chinese statements were voiced; that france has not signed up for any real anti-chinese action. there were many statements that there were so-called risking, because you need to separate yourself a little, but i did not understand that this was a sanction

i didn’t sign the communication, she signed it, but in this communication there were no real anti-chinese actions, only statements and calls for the fact that let’s gradually separate from china, etc. and so on. if there were no zelensky focus, china would be more powerful indeed. i think that they could well take some already serious sanctions against china. france did not want to switch their attention to this. we discussed everything within the framework of the g7, which is essentially a presidential event. and the most important event of this event, the coordination of the delivery of f-16s. not china quite right, the conspiracy version has one flaw well. uh, in today 's world, secret diplomacy is generally impossible, because we know how the same french, unfortunately, and uh, what was said. well , now the negotiations were being made public, so i can’t imagine in a nightmare that the chinese and the frenchman, two lydia , agreed on this, damn it, it needs to be like this. mega scandal them. i’ll tell you honestly, if you americans thought that they

should go further at this step than no comments macron, by plane and zelensky on his tail. well, there was no impact, by the way, the latest drawing, but this did not affect everything. this is the official uk stance on jeans. family group demonstrates unity of purpose on china china poses the greatest security and prosperity threat of our time. he is becoming increasingly authoritarian at home and assertive abroad. the group of seven showed that britain's reaction was in complete agreement with that of the allies. i am something i didn’t see a macron that would come out and say suna what are you, and why am i here it’s all there wasn’t, an unfounded statement, a solution, there were statements of other leading things. malik is in this final comm. well, why do xinjiang, which everyone was all the more, and even more so for you to touch. these are the diseases. they were real evacuation actions of some sort of

anti-chinese had not been agreed upon. they are not included in this communiqué, therefore, in some ways, we probably succeeded. although, again, i don't think it was understandable. i do not think that there was some kind of macron conspiracy, but no. i think it's just that the macron was motivated to move away from himself a little bit now anti-chinese history. well, in general, he did it. i will honestly express a version that is not connected with any of your versions. fine? that's for everything. it costs a person. mr macron that's because it's the elusive joe who nafig niko maxim said, nafig no one needs. and so he did it in order to show that joe is not so elusive, someone needs him. well though to zelensky, who can be given a plane , everything else is meaningless. this is a projection of personal inferiority and mr. macron, nothing more behind these well, personal psychotrauma. maxim may i say so? okay, that's what the language of political correctness, yes

, between words, excellent learning, yes, personality traits. here is such an abyss of alternative talent. it's even further than features. that's why my version is such a manifestation of the personal characteristics of the master personally two-faced characteristics of personal characteristics. mr macron. keep small. sorry for revealing. oh well, as for the f-16 fighters. that is, look guessing, right? when they are delivered, how many will they be delivered, where will they take off from? i think that the situation will depend on exactly when to put them in what situation, yes, that is, you and i perfectly understand that there is one scenario that many in the west, including ukrainian lobbyists, are striving for , but now arrange a counternab to defeat russia on the battlefield to impose russia has its own requirements. there will be some sort of freezing of the conflict, then we will supply these very fighters as some kind of security guarantor in the future. and perhaps with some status.

well, not a nato member. well, for example, you already mentioned this closest nato ally today, israel as a country, but , after all, israel is not the only non-nato ally of the united states, many countries have such a status and you egypt is pakistan taiwan in fact. well, quite a large number of countries, so if you wish, you can, of course, give it to ukraine. this is an option one of the most beneficial options for the west is number two, if they are already being delivered, of course, as part of active hostilities, but here yes, it is quite possible that they will take off from poland to cross their border obviously. they put it together with long-range american missiles, because everything is done for this. here, launch missiles, then fly back to poland because, well, as it were, closer to the front, most likely, it makes no sense to deliver it from there, given that russian air defense is already working there, therefore there are many such obscurities here, but in any case, they will be put. this is, of course, an important escalation. yes, this is the step that america purposefully takes. i would like us to notice this, by the way, in the case of deployment on the territory of poland

. no wonder i wrote this report to them. uh, the bow will be the first blows, because it will be the use of polish airfields to strike russian troops will be direct. uh, no participation indirect. it's absolutely perfect. uh, fuck, since you're the united states specialist of all, uh, everyone's been paying attention to history. when biden said shatab, look. mr. president , are the republicans negotiating in good faith? this is happening in stages. i have already participated in these negotiations, they began. shut up well. thank you, shawty nisha. pasha shamsha. yes , but still he says, shut up somehow shut up yes, please, please yes , it is clear here that the main problem was connected precisely with this discussion of the national debt ceiling, which is strongly absolutely yes and unconditional

allies. america is a little nervous in such a situation, biden has to interrupt his negotiations, call constantly washington to negotiate further negotiations are not from a dead point. they are not moving anywhere at the moment. well, i think that all holders of the american national debt, including japan , europeans, british, for example, uh, and other countries. well, they also arrive in a very nervous state. yes, if it happens, after all, a technical default, to be honest, i wouldn’t particularly believe it, but you never know, suddenly it will happen, they will be under attack. well, this will happen only if a very influential group, one of the americans , decides that it needs to be done now. now, if there is such a solution, then you can happen. yeah, find ellen brisk, that says we 'll have tax receipts on june 15th. well, we may not live until june 15, do something. well, yes, here on the one hand, it seems, yes, if

you understand, uh, the statement was on the fact that on june 1st they default and then 15 days of default, then they receive new money and somehow individual questions emerge. is such a scheme legally possible, but default, then without any decisions of the congress, uh, digging out, but, probably, in the current political situation, they will say that it is possible . no, there are technical issues. can they not make payments without calling or calling the system in the same place. what is the meaning of the technical. which well, periodically they announce at trump. yes, they pressed, there was such a situation, they do not pay salaries to state employees, respectively, the closure of the government is a little different. well well the same thing. oh no, still, a technical default is a more serious story. here they are already refusing their debts. and at the same time, e is a republican. yes, this is makar yes, he surprisingly made a positive statement that we discussed everything with old man joe, drew red lines, and

are moving towards some kind of agreement, that is, apparently the republicans. well, if you believe, this statement, after all, they don’t want to go to the end, well, it’s just that the democrats are blue, let’s see yes, if the macron still wanted zelensky to talk about their warm relations again, well, probably, achieved. now the next stage will talk directly to the second second story. it has to do with listening. well, at the household level, it looks very simple, that is, president macron brought the clown of the main world clown. e, in which, thus , everything is quite boring for this party, but he brought such a one to the anti-chinese one on a new stream, and everyone on the media agenda started talking about ukraine and not about china , that is, not so much time china was on the agenda, it was in the information paid, because zelensky you really diluted and diluted quite strongly with this presence of yours. was it profitable for zelensky? of course yes. then artyom took the mask, yes, that is, and

they provided him with a new platform. he is there, maybe once again once again a piece of paper. you no matter how he performed. he importantly, that he there arrived. yes, you banged him, he says only we stayed. well, yes, and then i had to refute in half a day that he didn’t mean that he received the installation, listening to vova, what are you, this is a training manual. there are 3 more days. we needed to pull. and you gave out there now , was it profitable bytes? well, of course, yes. that is, you are talking now, but now they have a serious problem with public debt with the possibility of default, everything is about that is, they were ready to talk on this topic once again , pump up the story related to the counteroffensive in many times they said that there will be counterattacks, there will be to interrupt the informational agenda is a failure. so they will interrupt her and, accordingly , these statements, and such muddy statements by biden that she is about to begin therefore, we are very much looking forward to it really being able to start in the near future, because there are too many parties who are very interested in it, so that it starts now, at least, draws

informational attention to itself. by the way, well, do not contradict you, yes, without debating with you. i think that the americans delayed the decision to meet zelensky, well , for a long time, because all these launches of american rumors that he will urgently leave, because there is a default and so on and so on. etc. uh, i think for the americans it was . it was an important decision point, at least for the biden sullivan blinkin group and the prestige they decided. will they publicly sign under counter-warfare or will they not sign for profit or disadvantage now or the day after tomorrow and have decided that they will sign under contrasts. so this is the blueprint for this solution. yes, according to their e hopes, yes , it should lead to some results that will suit it adds, so to speak, in favor of the fact that this contrast is being prepared

as a serious event. they are a checkpoint imitation from zelensky will make you go to your death. seriously, we will break for commercials right after it will continue the zemstvo doctor 8 years later in the previous series. and what does he do here as a sponsor, well, the surgical department has a hectic life. olga ends. with the return of the ex-husband , he came on a white sponsor's horse, right? schoolboy it looks like i found an investigative file, i don’t need to talk to you about myself. olga does not know that the problems are just beginning. and

what will you do if they start digging the zemsky doctor 8 years later, continued watch today at 21:20. well, we have the first drug in stock, the second one too and the third one is available in a dosage of three and 10 mg, where such confidence comes from with the honest sign application, you will find out which pharmacy has

the necessary medicines in stock, and this is definitely the state labeling system honest sign, be sure on wednesday two twisters for the price of one in the kfc app everything that we love grows in gardens bring the traditions of ancestors, native land and juicy fruits, sadydoya, first-hand quality sovcombank pensioner can get special conditions, so one others are already taking a loan, others are happy with the interest on the deposit, what you need in the branch and online age. solve questions watch videos powerful smartphones and stylish tablets at attractive prices already take your stars on fire. so they already exist. meet exclusive content from authors and bloggers on any topic of interest will provide you

with exclusives from your favorite authors. find your center. you sit and do nothing. enough. download the national lottery app and play on very special terms. does he personally each smartphone moscow coffee houses a combination of tradition and advanced technology of the highest class, and the taste of pleasure. love to recommend gloria jeans is not a dream come true. this is the reality of discounts from 40 to 70% of the price from 99 rubles. gloria jeans in life good luck. hope fills you with their lunch, fritme workers many tasks your break fills their meat sauce sytin hot meat with noodles fills crying warm sunset of the joy of life fill cry if someone says that he saw prices, lower, most likely. this is a huawei duck smartphone for

20.99. and everything is in installments in eldorado time flows. choose the power of natural water. you will also meet your favorite musician here, and, if you're lucky, your loved one. we will be together a meeting place in vk where to buy a dream in the country or in the battery bar every 30 minutes, the winnings are instantly credited to everyone at

my expense. download the national lottery app and play on very special conditions. personally, every smartphone loves you a russian coffee pot and will tell you why moscow coffee houses combine traditions and advanced technologies of the highest class, and taste pleasure i love moscow coffee houses, i recommend my sister in russia 60 years ago, his father, a young soviet engineer, ernes, met the russian beauty lyudmila and fell in love with his daughter forever. unfortunately, could not do we started a large-scale search to take place in the family after almost 50 years, malakhov today at 16:30 on the channel, russia this is the program who is against

on channel russia 1 we continue our discussion. this is where i asked too. why did the macron need this, yes, and we exchanged very different versions. here, here i have also have this question. there is such a general secretary, he is good. and then suddenly he posed the question point-blank. so i'm asking why? well, see for yourself. the bratwood system and the security council reflect the power relations, the powers in 1945 the global financial architecture is outdated non-functional and unfair against the backdrop of the economic turmoil caused by the covid-19 pandemic and the russian invasion of ukraine, it has failed to fulfill its function as a global security system. the time has come to reform both the security council and bretton. woods institutions, basically. this is a matter of redistributing power in

accordance with the realities of today's world. well, ingeniously, nothing foreshadowed. well, okay, if about this one about usb reform he has been talking about for a long time, and whoever i have not talked about it. and basically, everything, but like this, so that the secretary general would come out and say, the world's financial uh, the architecture is outdated, it needs an apology. think wow version. i deep thought explains a lot. you can , of course, suck at covid that russia attacked ukraine as if it had never happened before in eight waves, nato expansion has, well, had no effect on the security architecture that has been established. well, yes, probably, he may not have been an insect then. but in general with regard to the united nations. well, you know, here. eh, when they have been fruitfully substantively engaged in the implementation of the second part of the grain deal package for so long. i

feel like i can watch this forever. you see , they have certain obligations. which they are obliged to fulfill, that is, this is their part of the obligations. here he is. yes somehow trying to strive to accomplish something there, but so far i don’t see something that he succeeds in. i want to come back. uh, to gs7 in general , following the results of jail i understand that, uh, the americans in general, they completely lined up all their allies, every single one. they completely control them, they will finance and will continue to finance. e ukraine, they do not refuse. no from one of their plan and the goals and objectives that they set, they clearly designed everyone to solve a global problem. do you remember in the last gear i assumed that after all to burn the technological point of view of the biden is inappropriate to meet zelensky was such a version, and i think it would be correct. why because in fact he still has an agenda inside, the united states of america, but, apparently, the situation

is so complicated, he was forced to put zelensky next to him divide, emphasizing the responsibility for the counter-offensive, which mr. will be obliged to uh this responsibility. and this i remind you of a counterattack with an absolutely unpredictable consequences for the united states as well, but nevertheless, apparently, the situation is so complicated he had to do it he did it, let's see how it all ends. i'll be honest, no, i'm sorry. by the way, i think one of the motives. here, they say, zelensky was not torn, well, he was not torn. i think that was one of zelensky's motives to get a public situation that the united states will share responsibility for what is happening. this will not help him in any way, but the desire. i think you their balls were you yes, you have to learn to separate, in general, the interests of zelensky the interests of ukraine these are completely different interests what i would say zelensky travels around europe

he does not solve the issues of ukraine i can. to state with firmness, if zelensky did not fly anywhere, they would allocate 375 million. they would give everything that is needed, all the weapons, and so on, without zelensky well, these voyages are just him he solves the issue of personal security, no more no less and you took everything and more than that, he got the opportunity. i think bypassed would be very nice to say someday he will say, if he is alive, that we took the decision to start the contrast together with the president of the united states in hiroshima. well, he might say, but to be honest about the fact that biden, the united states of america will be divided there. there is responsibility for the counteroffensive. i highly doubt you understand, they will say, we did it all, respectively, we set everything up. but yes, but inside the country, they will not say so. well, it seems to me that inside the country they are not so immersed in the issues of ukraine. there and

and so on, as far as we are and, uh, those present here, i would also like to draw attention to another region that, well , it is getting hotter and hotter, the south caucasians are getting in mind, uh, today, the prime minister of armenia said a lot of things there and about the csto, from which they may come out, and and about the russian border guards on the iranian border, and uh, what else does it whine on the other hand, there was a statement about the fact that they recognize the territorial integrity of azerbaijan, which includes karabakh, this is such a very serious statement , which today they are discussing very seriously and everyone, in general, uh, is still wondering what is behind this, but on the other hand , the activity of the british and americans in armenia attracts attention , uh, with literally these days there for the secretary of state, m-m for issues europe uk is located. there are also two very high-ranking officials of the minister of defense of the united

states of america, and they are still passing through the same place. working meetings on the line, uh, this one here, yes, there is international cooperation. in general, all this, as it were, evokes such hmm a bad thoughts. to be honest, i also paid attention to the press conference of prime minister pashinyan, i do not agree with the assessment of the gii that it is getting hotter, on the contrary, things are moving towards a settlement, by the way, because for the first time ever lady of armenia - declared that she was ready to admit, and that nagorno-karabakh belongs to azerbaijan. but this in general, uh, will have plowed consequences for the republic but nonetheless. it's clear what's going on. uh, diplomatic activity is now uh greater than ever through for 3 days, both pashinyan and president aliyev will negotiate in moscow with president putin , then they meet, in my opinion, on june 2,

already under the auspices. e politicians in chisinau and in general, as a result of this, probably, like some kind of a peace agreement, but if they haven’t signed it yet, but we will see its rudiments, we will know , we will hear, yes, having seen, we will know we will hear we won’t guess. so the key issue here from my point of view is people's safety, you know, i'm sorry. uh. and yes, thank you very much. uh, if you read the ukrainian press, last 4 hours 5 hours. yes, in ukraine no one writes about the bangnut. in general , no one writes anything. everyone writes, but these sabotage groups that entered the territory of the russian federation from the territory of ukraine write different writes that they are not ukrainians. come in. here it is again. here is this notorious legion of russia and how is it, that is , all the information topics in ukraine today are focused on this, take a rest, they don’t say a single word, and now they don’t say a single word about the statement

zelensky you said so. he really said that bakhmud our heart was further retelling further predicting the question of how ukraine lost bakhmut or did not lose you know, that's why this question of the vase is this question of ukrainian people, citizens of ukraine , ordinary people. if for how let them ask less zelensky, he answered them at first lost, then found in half an hour, what you don’t like, but you understand this is a lie, he is the president as a result of hostilities , the armed forces of ukraine either left, or they were taken out to leave the territory of the city of bakhmut. yes, this is zelensky's responsibility, and this is zelensky's responsibility not only for the city. and for those lives, for these thousands of lives that perished there, bakhmut of them, the number of graves. well, i why do you understand so to throw the topic to the fact that here russia is bad, and

we now or in general did not say anything differently. well, now a second of alcohol further you throw the topic. well, if you want to live in a bubble, you are waiting. well i am the topics that read want to live in this bubble. now they will sell you a collision there. she is at the border. by the way, well, already very, very much, stopped with losses in relation to those who climbed there, but they say that it was a gigantic action, people are now watching your programs in ukraine. i want to say son, what does it mean simply, well, they want to know the truth, if in ukraine they don’t talk about it. you see, people are watching. and i don't want to know the truth. i don’t know if they are watching your program, it means they want to, if they didn’t want to, if they watch our programs, then most likely yes, because they face criminal liability for watching our program. yes it is it more likely. yes, with regard to reading, uh,

psychologists. a physical operation that serves, by the way, by the way, are there smart people, then they must conclude. yesterday zelensky said what is left of our hearts. yes, then the truth did not admit it, and today an imitation counterattack on the border followed, a smart person should say to draw a conclusion. well, it seems that since we are tambling this, then they will bang. he’s artyom, this is all a smart person should say, because imitation violent activity on the border of the belgorod region is needed only in connection with the fact that there is a loss of bahnut. you can see everything, the riddle has been solved, but you had the right idea that there is an attempt to share responsibility. i still don’t agree with the genius to the end, of course, the americans do not follow every day what is happening on the ukrainian front, but reads certain signals yes and in. first turn. that's how the press - it serves. yes

, and what kind of background is the discussion of the situation? that is, now he is not prosperous, therefore, as we see, a lot appears. yes, there are critical articles about the situation. e for kyiv even sometimes panic articles appear and so on. this, in principle, creates a certain threat to the bytan administration. they spent a lot of money, and first of all, a lot of weapons for the ukrainian case. well, the ukrainian project is our own, and of course, well, we will have to explain ourselves already during the presidential race. what did 1.5 million shells out of the three million that were in the pentagon's stocks there are tens of thousands of missiles and so on. this is still not a small amount of a considerable amount of weapons. although, of course, a total of $150 billion spent on ukraine on a scale american budget - this is not much, but if we look at specific cases with ammunition, weapons, equipment, and so on. it's quite a lot, so here it is. i think that he still creates certain risks in his next presidential race, and one moment, briefly, literally about the statement of gutesh, as we know, the theory has long been that let us include many new participants in the un security council. yes, westerners say that let's

turn on some germany and so on. russia, in turn, proposes to include , for example, india or brazil. so i think you’re saying that you definitely don’t like such a concept, although it would be worth suggesting, given that he himself is of portuguese roots. that's how he would react to the entry, brazil would be a good question. well, about reforming the un security council - this is generally, in fact, a dangerous thing, because hmm the un is an organization that was created by the winners and an attempt, of course, to dilute the security council in this way is nothing more than an attempt to swap the winners and defeated, therefore, i would evaluate this situation very, very critically and would relate to this. indeed, as an attempt to change the world. in uh, the united nations is a dangerous attempt. today i have a good day with me. everyone disagrees. here, and about the hot thing that maxim said about the south caucasus, i will clarify hotly. i did not mean that there is close to the war and so on. i meant

that some such words and movements that , well, will take the situation to another level and some new ones will begin. yes, there are processes uh, and in the case of the csto and in the case of relations between the countries of the south caucasus and the countries of the region of turkey, russia , wounds, and so on. and this was what dmitry meant. you asked him during the program the question of how many ukrainians live said the figure is 18 million. i don’t know 18 or 20, but i remember exactly that 10 years ago ukraine was offered the ukraine agrarian superpower project. and this project involves no more than 15 million people. so i think these events that take place vasily in our country. well, it is connected with the fact that the population of ukraine in the final option, if it remains as a sovereign, or part of it remains. that will be about 15. uh, agrarian kept millions of people without any industry without anything. yes, well, here is the solved version of the program to chat. the main thing, not the main thing, is the global financial

infrastructure, because sami brix to which all countries have contributed an alternative financial world system. and this is what the americans cannot allow, it comes out , he says that we will discuss it here. no need. there, as a general world problem. here i see it conditionally, cunning move on today everything right now watch the news program and see you tomorrow. the information service of the russia tv channel continues its work on the air, you watch the news. my name is maria sittel hello group strike with high-precision weapons on the dnepr airfield, all designated objects destroyed