[000:00:00;00] they rejected the initiative that proposed to allow, despite the neutral status of the country, the re-export of weapons to ukraine, the german newspaper dzyudovich zeitung writes that one of the perpetrators of the terrorist attacks on the nord streams could be a ukrainian soldier, but his connections with kiev have not been established, in my opinion, the version with aliens. it could be more convincing the united states is making every effort to convince the world community that they are not a party to the conflict, do not wish russia harm and generally want peace, however, the facts say back, yes, and the president clearly contradicts the statements of his administration, but president putin is holding a meeting of the security council dedicated to issues of internal stability, opening the meeting. in particular, he said

dear colleagues, good afternoon. you know that quite recently, within the framework of the relevant presidential council, my colleagues and i dealt with issues of interethnic relations in the country for the russian federation - these are extremely important issues, i mean. e that we are 190 ethnic groups living in the country today we will deal with the same issues in relation to ensuring the security of russia, in this case , domestic political security, taking into account the efforts that our ill-wishers are making for all time and are intensifying in order to shake up the situation inside the russian federation a. you and i must do everything to ensure that under no circumstances will you allow this to happen. well, the most important thing. it is clear that, well, the situation has now been drawn quite deeply and the only hope that can

be with our enemy. it is connected with destabilizing the situation inside the country, they do not see any other hope. by the way, they are freaking out because of this . but you discussed this yesterday. in general, this week it has become very noticeable, because the situation has moved to the point of decision. and that's how interesting they still feel they have an affair. well, people who don’t understand anything, here, which i don’t know how to hunt, there go butterflies , they catch, they are engaged in gathering. here, and here there are such powerful titans of geopolitics who easily destroy everything. well, it’s interesting, uh, and the kyrgyz, he spoke about three principles, blinks on i’ll show you more today. he spoke about how he loves russia in general directly. no, maybe he loves terribly here, but biden. u, speaking to the air force, told how powerful they are and what they are actually doing in ukraine

. see from more than 50 countries we have provided historic security assistance that has allowed ukraine to defend itself. i was there many times before the war i spoke in the rada was there during the war. the u.s. air force and space was the backbone of this operation, providing airlift and logistical know-how to transfer cargo to reload artillery, combat vehicle ammunition, providing missile attack warning through space reconnaissance, communicating with no other nation. this is generally like a hyper right in the world all over the world does not have such capabilities. how are we doing this movement, yes, it was so interesting, they are one different nation. here is the new master race. at us, or something, you know, but something else is interesting, that everything we did is the basis of this operation. this is what is said directly

to them by texts. yeah, on top of everything kirby, er, blinkin and all the rest of them is the basis of the military operation in ukraine, what the united states does . well, that this is the highest nation is not news. in general , only churchill really disliked the germans and hitler personally because hitler believed that the germans were a higher race than the english. and it's like in that joke than an american. better than the germans. yes, yes, so there is nothing new here. uh. well, and the fact that it is frankly reported. this is also not a stipulation. it's not a mistake. this is a show of strength, as they understand it. you know, all this is our tool. with his help, we will crack russia, yes, we will open it like

a tin can. so approximately what will come of it. well, it’s like reflection is not allowed here in relation to such texts , you can’t ask such questions. and if not, i want it just like that, and if not, then yes, if not, but then what will be very interesting, but they also relied on internal unrest. in russia in 1917 it turned out i'm there, and yes i5 yes, yes, yes, yes for sure, and in general, in the ninety-first it turned out yes, 2011 nothing happened from the word at all. so i think that nothing will work out now, because well, we seem to have learned this historical lesson, but at the same time , you know, it’s also interesting how they work, and so dumb. that's it, it's parallel. now i'll show you pancakes. yes, this is the best friend of the russian people andy damn

, well, look here. we are our allies partners acting in response to putin's invasion with the same goal to help ukraine defend its sovereignty, territorial integrity and independence and stand up for international rules and principles threatened by putin's ongoing military let me say that directly to the russian people, the united states is not your enemy peaceful the end of the cold war for over 30 years. we shared the hope that russia would come to a bright , free, open future of a fully integrated world. we have tried to support stable relations and cooperation with moscow because they believed that peaceful , safe, prosperous, russia meets the interests of america yes, the interests of everything. eh, world, we still believe it. well, let's put an end here. that's enough,

you know, well, we all lived here in the nineties. after the spin of the cold war, we all saw the politics of the united states over the years. and it is necessary to have such a feature, which, probably, is the main thing for their politician. and get out that's talking like he committed, well the absolute truth is broadcasting, and everyone should believe in it and choose either on the one hand there will be pain that promises, uh, canoes , or on the other hand there will be practically pleasure and a happy life that the russians promise, damn it choose what you see, what rich choice. this is work. there is an alternative. true, an open future open society is an open future. the main thing is that there is an alternative. so here's an alternative for you. here biden is twirling and a happy existence. crap. what do we need? i forgot to say one word to blinka

prosperous well-fed rich, russia that's how it is then yes, it's okay then it's quite personal, you know? here sasha you would be right. sorry logically, climbed wrong. it is forbidden. it is so to say. say why not, because if only the rich, well-fed, prosperous were true. then it would be possible to exchange the rich with this prosperous infusion. well, since a rich , prosperous saint is an absolute lie , humiliated, a beggar, offended, then well, i'm sorry for god's sake, in fact, this kind of revelation from the side of the representative american research. they are also very useful. eh, well, we no longer perceive them only with a smile. ah, but he also speaks to the whole world and, uh, and it is important for us that

such statements sound in india , china, brazil, south africa, where a meeting of foreign ministers just took place shave uh, because, well, by and large account. this is the very exposure, but the military confrontation that the radio is now well, if not live, then close to what weapons are being supplied and, by the way, the confrontation this and globally. and from the side of the global south, and even in america, it begins there is no need to send weapons. that is, we send weapons. you are prolonging the war. we 'll talk about it all over the world. as you understand, and against the background of this , such statements look self-revealing. and in principle, this is beneficial to us, because in any case, any naked american king is better for us than, uh, dressed up and pretending to be uncle sam there, it’s interesting, it’s your son who loves this topic. yes, the same, damn it, ken i did not become my. well uncle, but show, but it's interesting, and he suddenly said that he welcomes any country

that will bring russia to the negotiating table. so you said a month ago and repeat after that that china and china and brazil are engaged in this business, but it's all calculated , semyonova likes to talk about awareness, the fish is destroying yes, which they don't remember what happened 3 weeks ago. ah, from all the events of the last 24 hours. the most interesting thing seemed to me the summit in chisinau, i don’t know where we are prepared , we can do anything. we can discuss this, not just didn’t take them, i understand. yes, yes , yes, yes, well, i’ll tell you some things myself, that there, well, these are the leaders of all european states, except for turkey and san marin, they came there. well, russia wasn’t even invited, but it was interesting to watch president zelensky and his press conferences from his negotiations with

moldovan president maia sandu, and what struck me more was that the ukrainian media came up with a quote that these words that sandu allegedly uttered . well, that is, there at the beginning they honestly quoted, then quotes, such as what we will invite, and the ukrainian troops over time, so that they climb. yes, with russian peacekeepers in transnistria well, in general, the office of the moldovan president was forced to refute all this. well, in general, it was an interesting moment, but the most interesting for me , frankly, unpleasant, and it was a meeting between presidents zelensky and aliyev, which means, and if you haven’t seen it, dear viewers, please, on my telegram channel. it's posted there. so, in what an absurd situation the meeting took place. well so the part that's for the press in english. you can imagine the level of zelensky’s

english proficiency, when it means that they are approaching each other, greeting each other, then aliyev is shaking each other’s members of the ukrainian delegation. everyone, of course, in camouflage, the whole conversation is in english, which means alif, of course. well, you know, he demonstrates to the russian language. in this case, i just pay attention to it, but zelensky looked, of course, comical, because it was heard that he speaks english, but english is impossible. here he is not in able to conduct, but intelligible negotiations, because we heard him speak normally, but another thing. maxim, let's go, that's just so serious. well, these half-witted they are every delegation. and at every press conference they suggest using english instead of russian, this is the position of a half-wit ukrainians paid attention to

press conferences, journalists even apologize if they ask a question in russian, because in english they can’t even have such precedents, so how is it interesting, by the way, also the plot. look yeah so look carefully here. well, if there are ini nerds we propose to introduce negotiations in english. well, as you rightly said, aliyev speaks english. well, he also taught him, by the way, if i'm not mistaken, right , you know, he speaks well, he says, well, if you want to speak english, i will speak english, well , i'll have fun at the same time, because well, as you rightly said on i there, well, in english you know that, but when i hear zelensky, well, i get, uh, such a pleasure of a humorous show, in general, well, you want to be. you know this clownery. well, play for god's sake. well, now, of course, yes. i, of course, without such terms, but peculiar to you. and i'm

so calmer, but what still unpleasantly surprised me, because given the whole background. aliyev his experience of his, of course , deep down skeptical and squeamish attitude. here is to this distancing from the russian language, that he himself must be given his due. he does not allow himself inside his own. still, it seemed to me that he could find some way to dissociate himself from this a little. look for, uh, vladimir aleksandrovich well, something like that. well, let's go, who puts it in russian i didn't find it and i didn't think it was necessary , i think that after all it testifies to how our life is changing and even, in general, close partners with whom there is no one. yes , you are honored to distance yourself from the language just in case, because, well, it’s true, but honestly, i’ll tell you. this is your reasoning looks ridiculous, but no. seriously. well, well

, you know, everything means, if you don’t see there, no trends that are good for us, that’s all, what is happening in the world, everything is fine , only positive maxim again. here, look again, you understand, you feel that you are wrong. well listen to me. well, listen. first of all, i asked gio not to participate, faggot. secondly, i listened attentively again, you start everything, because you feel that the soil is bad. i'll explain, i'll explain, i 'll explain, it's very very calm now. if you don't bother me. you try not to interfere with saying, i just don’t need to hear from me again that i’m wrong. here it is again. you see, for some reason you have attracted an argument, allegedly that i am talking about everything in the world, that everything is fine with us there? you just used it as an argument against me. well , what is not true, about any whole world in our discussion with you? no, i

didn’t use such arguments , i didn’t make a crazy assertion, that everything in the world is good and everything is fine. and for some reason you decided to restore these arguments to me , now your attention will always say at least a little bit of what may seem negative right away. but emotional. okay, you're right. yes, maxim says again, i have described my point of view to you, i see it as protocol and that this is how the situation was arranged. now, if these strange people here offer me to speak english, but fine. i will speak in english your proposal. no, no , what's the difference. there is no gesture here, i don't care. could it be in turkish or azerbaijani, right? it's strange, yes. it would be strange. it would be strange. here. well, okay, okay let's say so at maxim he likes to build some kind of versions like that, but

this is also your right. maxim i don’t decide you, this question will not be spoken to him in english, i really hope, and the president is also finished. he's also english , i bet he won't, but i could lose. i'm not going to argue. maxim you love for some reason. here, and here now the president was such an explanation, because he also speaks english well, but ah, it's understandable. it's all right, all right. let's list everyone who speaks with us, ok in english. this will be an argument they argue there, but i would return to the situation that i nevertheless discussed. it seems to me that it is much more important in terms of its deposition, because from what zelensky said, something else is really important for themselves. he tried to curtail the need and immediately got hit in the forehead, because zelensky said, if they don’t give me an accurate road map, i won’t come to donate myself.

after that, blinkin birbock stoltenberg came out, and they said everything, everything, everything, there will not even be a discussion of the issue of entry, because there is war and this is me in my own words and i think that they are well aware that anyone who signs e on ukraine's entry into nato at this time will sign his country's entry into the war with the russian federation and no one will do this, what will they do now zelensky after this statement, and i do not know whether to go to nato or not . he was promised the advice of nato ukraine nato instead of joining you like it. i really don't like it, i especially don't like it. here at the beginning they showed two leaders of ukraine, really their real ukrainian leaders - this is president biden and uh, foreign minister uh, damn it. so biden, when he says, well, one feels that a person in power

makes a decision. he says you are vasyl, you are my instrument, you are ukrainian society. you are all my tools. you are the state of ukraine, you are nothing, you are nobody, you are just a tool in my hands. i thought of everything, planned everything , delivered, organized. i give you your task to be tools in my hands against russia, this is saying in plain words this does not suit me. i don't like it but the only thing i hope is biden soon leave after all and not me, i do not know, i do not wish him bad. but what he fell after this speech. i still think that there is some kind of weakness in his legs. yes, that is , after all, but his legs are not such waves. well, let's see, yes, let's, while the blinkent is a more cunning devil and he is really the devil , because he pours two on my brain and on the fragile brains of fellow citizens like me. here's one cold other saying one thing,

here's china, that's possible. and the world needs to be attached let's think about it. i conditionally interpret in my own words. that is, he told me says, here is another track of peaceful development. perhaps yes, but on the other hand, again , ah. here, and the second he says, independence is territorial integrity, not democracy. well, that's it, this is chewing gum, which we have been feeding for decades, but on the other hand. he still says that we will stand with you. that's to the end and so on, but nevertheless, even blinkin said yesterday to zelensky. no, vladimir alexandrovich i won't. all correct conclusion. what conclusion do you draw from this? i understand, i'm shocked because, well, if i am an instrument, no matter what conclusion i make, i will use it, because something needs to be connected in america. i mean myself in no way. that's all you are talking about now, because after all, you are watching this now, you are talking like a person who has been for quite a few years. here we have a discussion already so to speak, well

advanced. for very strongly, but for the press harmonine. i'm sorry that i pronounce it with such an accent. yes? for him, this is an exemplary situation. well, what else do you need to say in plain text zelensky promised ukrainian. now we will go, we will go to fight for the fact that we are fighting well , everything will be given to us. yes, well, at some point in order to win well, so that we are sure that victory is ours. this is guaranteed by the entry of the united states and nato into the war in the nineties, when i was still a young kid and now and now you were told there would be no entry. just so die firewood hype. well, you can get a lot of synonyms here. here is approximately any of them, as they are called, but who threw whom zelensky and ukrainian people or, uh, british? zelensky, let me tell you exactly

what zelensky threw, the ukrainian people zelensky that, well, i and all the people who voted for him did not vote, but he simply took all the citizens of ukraine. he first threw us under the tank of war. and now he 's trying to sell something, but he can't even sell us anything, because sapwood has already been banned there. you said something new about the swiss parliament. may i quote your attention to this. the president met yesterday. e switzerland zelensky moldova there the same at the summit and that came home figuratively speaking and the swiss parliament invited against exports. e weapons in ukraine so zelensky went home. all that is, or can be, vice versa. it's good that they don't give us weapons. it's good that there won't be a counteroffensive . it's good that the ukrainians will not die in the fact that where this is trying to lead us further, but who is trying to us zelensky or biden. now i don’t quite understand, because if biden says a counteroffensive, but zelensky can’t yet.

here you are mistaken, again this is not for me zelensky can't. this is biden. it can't be much worse. and here is zelensky. by the way , where is he laid down, but i will ask him this way, because he comes from time to time. he spoke with mark there are interesting things. well, for example, they themselves released a report on the meeting of the headquarters, at which there were uh, slinsky and shpaf or someone there, and there was no discussion of strategic issues related to the counteroffensive. it was they themselves who were other subjects that appeared after our service. if you understand this for a moment, he is really appeared in a very strange way in the office. yes, he sits like that and waved his hand like that. so you see, it was a few seconds. well, obviously done, so to speak, i saw others on purpose. by the way,

check me there were others. there were no others for that matter maximum photographs in which he casts shadows. he spoke perfectly, and it was clear what he was talking about? yes, he said and just waved his hand. yes said, of course it was the only video. i'll put proof in the movies it's there. well, in life too. proof in life is called a person should hold in his hands only in the store what to keep for today's morning, but uh about it is necessary to let me discuss the worst thing that happened yesterday when the president of romania spoke and said no european union no european. the union is no fast accelerated and so on, only reforms must be slowly and confidently carried out. that is, he said, no, you see, both the window and the door slammed shut, and i don’t even know what else to slam. no, wait,

the corridor remained where i told you everything, the corridor remained. here is the corridor to the front left. no, look there. that is, precedent assistance. i am confident that the ukrainian forces now have the ability to liberate more of the occupied territories. but we need to do it. more we are working on a multi-year aid package with secure funding. this will provide ukraine with deterrence and defense in the long term, it will help restore the security and defense sector, as well as the transition of ukraine from the equipment and soviet-era training entirely with nato is the most important thing for nato and of course for ukraine to win this war. and we are providing an unprecedented level

of support at today's meeting and at the vilnius summit next month, and it is clear that the focus must be on maintaining and intensifying military support for ukraine, equipment, ammunition and supplies. this will free up more space. i am talking about this because we have to be extremely focused. on this ukrainians. asking for more and we mobilize and mobilize more and more support because it will be a tragedy for ukraine and also dangerous for us if president putin wins in ukraine it will make the world more dangerous it will send a message to all authoritarian leaders to use military force to achieve what they don't want and it will also make us more vulnerable. ingenious corridor understand? he's still a coward. he does not want to sign, for

this he himself does not want to fight. wait, fool, or something, in the first place you will never notice, no one promised this. it was necessary to be able to to convince ourselves to convince ourselves that if we get rid of russian, by the way, for eight years we got rid of russian, how we didn’t calm you, calmed you, you got rid of imposed, by the way, by the way, and on sex. here you corrected them. they will tell you directly. excuse me, who? well, ukraine well , all the time, it means that she wanted something from russia all the time she was demanded to attack her, she behaved aggressively. here arranged various provocations. well, uh, ukraine did it, because you promised to say, ukraine well, you promised stand next to us. no, sorry. we promised to help you, but we have doubts to help you. see how much to download military intelligence. e britain is not in charge of special operations

is not located. here on the territory, in order for this to become a fact , zelensky and his general should come out and say everything that has happened since march and before that, by the way, also happened under the guidance of british intelligence. this will be the number. you know so much food for thought. so many interesting topics. don't know, what to start. well, you know, you should be thankful, these are blinks on this akhtemberg, that they are telling the whole truth, because they say, why are they not afraid of anything. we no longer need to carry out some secret operations in order to pull out documents that i don’t decide something in secret offices, but the world comes out and they say that, so we are for chewing gum for peace, that means love is there and so on. today, they are not impudent, they are obviously hypocritically talking about it, and here this, it means blinking, which tells us that we, and not enemies of the russian people, that for so many years they wanted russia to enter the free world. here are the nineties. i say, i lived in russia, it was hell, what they

did in russia, it was hell, you know, and this system is not new, you know. and yet, it means that there, in my opinion, on this very one, and in the 19th century there was such a jeremiah bintan, which he proposed to create. uh, it means a concentration camp where you have to control criminals with the help of pain and pleasure. yes, and they are not only that, but they say that they are ready to work there for free as a warden for free, that this system run? now they have decided to spread this panopticon to all countries where they can do this, and they wanted to turn it into russia. here is such a panopticon, where completely. pleasure will rule and well , as they say, it's good that we were able to get off this disastrous one for us. uh, as they say roads, the second thing i wanted to say, in my opinion, the second about the first. well , maybe you accidentally, of course, the word panopticon here, in my opinion, is inappropriate, because bentham offered nails.

wait. wait, don't argue with me. you i agree about the mentam. it's all right. only this is no panopticon. this is a management method. yes, all peoples and the way they are subjugated. what kind of panopticon is this? this is realpolitik absolutely now this is an absolutely real method of anglo-saxon realpolitik. this is what i wanted to say. continue, please, so now, as far as vladimir putin's speech is concerned, this is security in domestic politics. yes, this is one of the most pressing topics for our country today , the most vulnerable, one might say. that's what international relations say. i think, that we have no problems between national relations there is a problem. elite is in the elite. there are people for whom it is in their interests to kindle this non-national committee inside the country, because we saw how it happened at the end of these soviet years, everything was controlled from the center. you see, from moscow it is with elite

i'm excellent. i remember it. i know the people who were doing this, and they later pestered that they were doing this, that is, yes, the americans gave the cia a role there. well, it was a generator locomotive, which means from moscow controlled all this by the soviet elite. today paul's elite escaped. well, someone stayed because someone else is sabotaging. we see that this same dog passes going on. we see that some kind of graters begin among themselves, and all open, the mission of each other blames something, that is, there are problems, this problem must be solved somehow. well , in order to identify them, you need no special body. that's how we twist, i can't refuse it, because some kind of org. give them powers he see such, that is, what is normal on a devotee professionals. yes patriots and give authority, let them really be engaged in calculating to clean up this, that means, uh, space. this is too serious an accusation that there are elites in russia who burn interethnic relations. yes there is

thank you yes a ryan i understand that elite is a dirty word for you. by the way, i never use it. you noticed because the word elite and its function. this is a direct anglo-saxon design. well, yes, yes, yes, attention, as i was told, yes, in another way, how to say? that's what you get people. wait what are you worry about people about yourself, take care that you understand what you are saying, and then, and then to people, because because you look. well, elite is a saxon concept, denoting groups with shares. the authorities are real and therefore they operate with this , understanding what they are talking about among themselves. and when we start to pronounce it here, then nothing but an internal scandal happens. here please note that we do not have groups that have a share in power, in

principle, there is no other matter that our entire history is all the time an attempt by different groups get this share for this revolutions were made and all that stuff, but that's another story. and when you use words behind which it is not clear what we have, maxim's reaction occurs. can i have one river? can? tell me, please , it’s neither good nor active, but the former elites who were with us today are all on the run there, i don’t know in which countries and they weren’t part of it. this is uh rei here again this is not the elite. these are artists, well, beautiful mechanics. artist klimanova artist on chubais artist, what else? wait, all these former vice-premiers. well, so what? yes, wait, i don't know for me no. of course not, well then, of course not. yes, i say you won’t pronounce the word no, in

our country of reference for this word. i say when you use it, you destroy public communication by going back to linkin's words. ah, in fact, well, probably there is a self-disclosure in some sense, yes, but he does not address those who have passed the nineties. and where does anyone know the nineties from our stories, and from the stories, by the way, of other people who, uh, notice in our country directly idealized. and now it means that they began to idealize the 90 that it was a wonderful time of freedom , you listen, here are many of those who left. they are now saying, what is the nineties for you? this is a question that is constantly being asked by a referendum. i don't speak. this is a great time, when here i am, finally we are when we sighed , when it means that the country was so free, yes it’s impossible and when i believed that our country could have another way, there and so on. and that's it, and it's understandable. everything is addressed really young people. and now when

young people who can put 190 in their heads, it really was such a romantic time of change, there and all that. although probably, in a sense , there was a time for change, but they can now take the words of blin when they perceive it in a completely different way. listen, it turns out the americans. in fact, they wanted to be friends with us, it’s normal there, but somehow, it means that we broke it all. maybe we'll shoot again. still. we can agree. i would still go to these words. e, treated would be wary, and uh, understanding to whom they are addressed, with regard to stoltenberg. you noticed from the words that ukraine must return all its territories. he repeats more territory all the time. return, well, even more territories. well, what happens several times, he used this construction here, well, it’s clear that there is a translation, but, but it definitely differs more territory from its entire territory. this is absolutely

the refrain. uh, he slips and you know he has fatigue already from this post. e yes, until which very already he is there yes, he sits for a long time, uh, that's all. very so nervous, but the person is clearly already with such an excitement and with such an e that, well, you need to do something like that. well, go there already. well, now, we have already given everything and we still have to give more, and we seem to be unable to give any more. and you also need to understand. here is the despair in his voice and in his movement. i see, it's annoyance , absolutely annoyance. yes, there is another point, you understand, uh, they understand that that's how much they won't give. wow. here in this situation it's all pointless here's nothing will happen

, it will not be possible to destroy russia ; this is for success. and what to do to step back, everything will collapse, but to take a step forward. it's scary to go to war. and now stoltenberg hits like electricity. that's why he's shaking his hands like this from awareness. here is the dilemma. well, agree. here is stoltenberg. still there even year and a half ago. yes, when everything was he and now they are absolutely different people. it's noticeable in my opinion. yes, but why am i talking about this one, so to speak, the choice to enter the war, which means that the next step is a nuclear confrontation. well, look at the former american intelligence officer. do you think that the american foreign policy establishment is aware of all the danger that is happening, given the nuclear potential of russia no, i think it is not. i think most in the west just

brush off this risk, arguing that russians will never agree to this. i myself heard people talking, it's even on the record. they said that the fears are exaggerated, that the russians will never do this, because they understand that retribution will be soon and inevitable. this kind of irresponsible attitude towards what could literally become a disaster for humanity. this is a dangerous step and a big problem. we must constantly keep in mind. that there should be limits on what we can do and where we can go, because the russians have nuclear weapons, and because you can’t put russia in a position where they can give in to despair or decide that they are threatened by their potential danger, because they are really capable of using nuclear weapons and there is no chance that russia will succeed in ousting ukraine, especially if you start advancing on crimea and then decide not to use tactical nuclear weapons . yes , trying to explain to others. but it's better,

of course, to believe that the russians are afraid of retribution. well, at least putin said everything. a why do we need if we don't exist? why should we be afraid to give something there? here, uh, most of what western politicians say in public is, of course, uh, circus posturing and the actor is nothing. why because look here is the same blinken. yes, yes, they behave like sectarians in this sense, the main scout is right. this is a religious faith they lead like sectarians, but when they return to a closed office and ask each other questions about how you will win in russia, we will give 50 aircraft. and they have a thousand and a half, we will give 500 tanks. and at there are 2,000 of them, so we will not give people to this, but we will not give our people. and that army, that is , they are in a closed office. i understand that there is no good military exodus for them. well, and,

therefore, the only thing for them, uh, the light in the window. how did we start our program to make it so that we ourselves surrender , that we leave, that we break the political system, that our soldiers run away, this is their light in the windows, because they say military military victory, here is ukraine, uh, sovereignty and wait for this, but there is russia, which also has a territorial integrity excludes the donetsk-luhansk people. this is not the situation is not resolved. you had a response. yes, i have a response. she is by the way to everyone and starting shed. well, you are very accurate in this story. so you need to remember that when you listen, well , anglo-saxons, otherwise you need a term now. yes, yes, use the doctrine of the foreign political term. so, when you listen, you must understand that you need to follow not what they said, but for the default figures. and what are they doing here? this is so clear,

you can see it. and what is not visible, what is not said is visible, then there is, if all this is already recognized that it is we who are waging war, so in ukraine against russia with all these means the question is what is not said and what should be guessed by those to whom this is addressed. what will be the next step and there will be no collapse of russia, they need a nuclear war in europe because this is the only way to seriously destroy europe for a long time and return the situation that was in the forty- fifth year of 1945 to regain dominance. soot has no, that's what they want to organize. how to organize it. this is the second question, but it is in the figure default. so it’s too early to rejoice and they confessed everything, they didn’t admit anything. they gave you all the cards that you have already seen. it no longer has any value. and you even keep track of those cards that are left in your hand, and which are hiding there in the sleeve . good question. i affirm that what we

have done in belarus is an order of magnitude. cooled down was more it's just noticeable, of course, yes. it's just noticeable, so yeah, we're doing it manually, okay? no, wait. well, here you are logical, take two things separated. so amassing troops at our borders. yes, more romania and so on. hmm, here we are placing weapons in belarus, strengthening the kaliningrad position and doing something else that we have not announced. it is clear that we will use weapons if they really attack. well, we don't have a motive just like that. well, of course, yes, but when they see that a surprise is ready in belarus, and i notice. the poles suddenly lose their desire to cross the border, attack, join the war , and so on, if they planned, they would rather

they are afraid of it, they are strengthening their own poles, they are only afraid that it’s hot for them, of course, yes, because they explained it. we are sorry for you, if you judge, if you don’t judge, by the way, if you ask for permission to occupy 5 regions in western ukraine, most likely, we’ll give it a look , consider it and maybe give it, come on, so we’re bargaining for this. yes, behave yourself. nobody is holding on to you. well, this can be explained in the case when it is directly aimed, therefore , missiles in belarus until there is no explanation, it was for them meaningless. now the opportunity has arisen, but i would still turn to the words about freezers about polyakov. this, in my opinion, today or last night he said that, uh, that you need to defeat russia, you need to defeat russia once in 100 years, there is such a possibility. again, they are talking about these 100 years once every 100 years . there is such a possibility that it means to solve

for another 100 years while the past is a possibility, what a provocative question. so that's what he said, right? in 100 years we will resolve the issue. this means that ukraine will be in its own borders. this means that the neighbors did not begin to say what will happen, and we will be safer for the next centuries, and everything will be fine. and now it is necessary to re-it was he who addressed. this is to the question that the poles, of course, reacted to, uh, the deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus is another matter, that they themselves are not ready , if big brother agrees, yes, if big brother agrees, well then, maybe we would would not mind, and the big brother has a different task. how to send all of them to the war to sit there, oh what are we talking about? yeah, but they don't want to, yeah, about what's going to happen here. and if there will be nuclear lava here, who are the americans. they are sasha, they said it directly, i don’t remember

whose story, but they will find the editor now a few months ago six months ago, it was directly said that the fate of europe does not bother us in one of the sheer faces of americans. i remember this quote exactly. in terms of nuclear confrontation. it was said straight out of the box. no, i don’t think that this is a reservation , we will interrupt for advertising, after it you will continue. i i present to you, but the owner of the village is the premiere on the channel russia, the director of the reserve did not allow you to build an incineration plant, for god's sake. i'll help you, do you hear? i want us together i'm not going to lose it now that i just got it back, what's the ferrywoman gonna do dream valley. on monday at 21:20 the legendary show continues i am a strong

woman. here you are lucky with me amazing people both horizontal and vertical and vice versa, today at 21:30. so all year round about the sale on the ozone silver ring with topaz for 799 liquid glass for a car for 999 children's orthodon mat for 729 two delicious point spain barcelona burger bun and tomato sauce cheese triangles, lemonade

in spanish delicious and point well, the first drug we have in stock the second one too and the third one is in a dosage of three and 10 mg, where such confidence comes from with the application of an honest sign , you will find out which pharmacy has the necessary medicines in stock, and this is exactly the state labeling system, an honest sign be sure. here you are now my kfc basket for 169 rubles. russian lotto presents vova presents a new funny at any moment. choose your numbers or 37 luck, win millions and match any number in

the app. everything flows thoughts, rather time life. choose the power of natural water benefits of minerals freshness, gorshtau, natural anti-stress formula in life clothes fill you up your break fills meat sauce sytin hot meat with noodles fills crying. a warm sunset of the joy of life is heading, if the stars are lit, then they already exist. meet exclusive content from authors and bloggers on

any topic of interest will provide you with exclusive haters. we are sure that you are buying osago at a bargain price, but compare will find it cheaper. apply for osago to save on the number one service in russia if you have insurance, then be sure to compare it on the website and in the application. fashion for real life moscow coffee house on shares taste pleasure love recommend cherkizovo presents try it. i wanted to taste delicious, write to roll your nerves to vices. they do not crawl

out of the khitrovsky slums of the criminal with gilyarovskiy. yeah, it will be difficult today for valery popenchenko. on the russia sensation channel, they were the first siamese twins in the ussr who were successfully separated and since then, no one has heard anything from them. and that's how thunder from a clear sky news one of those very siamese twins gave birth. how it lived all these years, the most closed

family of the soviet union live. premier this is the program, who is against on channel russia 1 , we continue our discussion. well, that 's all you are, i'm serious, we're serious there, but we were arguing in terms of concepts, and at this time, although here how well to discuss, but at the same time, all civilized humanity is discussing this, what happened to the biden. yes, well, probably everyone has already seen civilized and then see for yourself put quotes do not put quotes. i 'm so categorical that in russia, uh, the fall is less discussed on travel than in the united states and in europe. well, let's see. yes, just for this. ah, oh beauty, haven't you seen it? yes, he writes, well, he did, yes, he makes an impression. well,

it was the sandbag that was to blame. well, there tv people, filmmakers know, yes, this is a load, which should light fixtures stick so they don't fall. well, uh, well , i wonder who put, so to speak, under his feet all this. well, he fell. he fell very hard and at that age, of course, such falls are very dangerous. there is nothing to discuss here. well, then it’s interesting, the american press wrote. pay attention to the american that the day of misadventures for the base. she's not over. he also hit his head. and about the helicopter area. well, when did you sit down? the same can be done, the only way, well, vanity, but especially on a full scale. that's clear, that's clear. what well, well, well , right, even the video was shown, by the way, they could not show it. that's who works inside the headquarters of the biden, not on a canoe, but, but you understand what's the matter. that's about sanitizing

the decline of america looks very impressive. well, i already imagine after this video trump , of course, spoke out and i won’t quote, but in general terms. he probably said something like this. i'm ready to kiss the sand that you walked on, because, well, the confrontation there, of course, they have a terrible one. but in general, i'll tell you, dmitry, you know, i'm here i look at this whole story, of course, you can discuss it all there. well, all this clumsiness of the baidan. she will be compensated by a flawless running mail. and it seems to me that it’s quite difficult to make predictions today about how this will all end, because, well, there will obviously be no fair transparent elections in the united states at all, so let’s see how it is. everything, for god's sake, you always build such with i ask you a question. and if he, god forbid, does not live, but this can only be with one provided that in one place there is both sand and cement and water, which i do not allow, therefore, in

this regard, i think he will still live to see the election campaign, because you know, as they say, uh, she doesn’t change horses while crossing . yes, and in principle, there is no one to change them yet, well, there is an obvious candidate there, who could at least somehow be comparable , relatively speaking, with canoes today there is no trace. well, to the question that you discussed. i want to go back to myself there themselves here yes, and to the fact that we already heard from inflammatory. in particular, they will start with zelensky his ultimatum, he actually presented an ultimatum, they say, either give clear signals, or i won’t go to the summit, what is the reason for this. this is due precisely to the understanding that there are no prospects for ukraine to join nato, and somehow it is necessary to relieve ourselves of responsibility within ukraine, at least differently, how to explain to people what they are actually fighting for. what kind of security are they fighting there, relatively speaking, and what kind of umbrella do they want to hide behind, if there are no prospects for joining in, and he thus demonstrates. i want to join nato, we have done everything to ensure

that ukraine joined nato, but sorry westerners. that is to say, our colleagues. they absolutely do not set themselves the task of including ukraine in nato structures and , accordingly, taking on some responsibility and obligations to ukraine; in principle, well, what we said is an absolutely hopeless idea. it's uh, we've talked more than once. yes, in principle, it is necessary to assess the situation based on desires of ukraine and not its desire. concede anywhere, as if to nato or the eu yes, but based on the interests of those who make the decision, but in the interests of those who make the decision, but ukraine's accession to nato contradicts their interests, therefore, of course, no e joining nato will not be about it. by the way, i said today, secretary of defense ben wallace yes in plain text. there he said that, well, you don’t need british, yes, uh, don’t, there’s really no need to give high hopes, because well, there’s no prospect in in the near future and even in the long

term, the performance of ukraine is not. yes, he said harshly. you must not repeat the mistakes of the past. by giving. uh, through the world with such a candidate as ukraine, actually, actually, after everything that happened. well, maybe wait for some fifth of july. yes, after that, zelensky would have to sign the decree of the president on the cessation of hostilities in ukraine. here, of course, frenzy in negotiations with russia, so, in principle, it should have happened like this. i'm talking about a person who has at least some kind of subjectivity. there is a head of the regime there, but at the same time , zelensky will never say. they don’t take us even to their own population, look, we wanted to, because as soon as he says this, he will immediately have a question. and what have you been selling us for the last 9 years, what will they take? yes, you didn’t know now

that you are being deceived in order to watch, but in order to simply preserve at least some image of a probable somewhere bright future for zelensky. need any handout. he needs any signal from nato, because the council ukraine nato will be prepared there, some other priorities will be prepared, and so on, so he will come , uh, rejoice that human propaganda will give something - this will unwind, yes, of course, and literally a couple words about biden, just a couple of words, firstly, do not underestimate the peculiarities of american medicine. they kept the chief justice for six months on ivei in order to re-elect him at the right time. and secondly, do not underestimate the cunning of democratic party because the democratic party. why is this showing up? why is this choice? here on the air, because there are people inside the democratic parties who understand that it is impossible to go to the polls with such a person. he's in such a state right now. and what will happen in a year, he will simply

lose any primaries, lose any choice, lose any debate, so it is highly desirable that biden now withdraw , pass at least some primers, watch the democratic party. at least they put someone sane, and there are mail and press and that's it. the rest will wind up his votes. well, you know. well, look at biden, how he fell, which means, yes, somehow i was offended by a man of age. so pass. uh, so, uh, there could be dire consequences. and so i want to advise you know why he falls, you understand? he has such an attitude in his head, which means that you must show that you are cheerful, that you are young. you can run. you can quickly climb the stairs to the plane there and so on. and on this, i therefore agree with you. you are a very important thing. i'm sorry i interrupted, that's all when he, well, sort of leaves, as the image makers have taught him. here time, do this pose and run for a light jog for a person at that age. all this

mental tension that he definitely needs to make it look at the same time gives rise to fear. what if i don't get better. well, in general, those who forced him in this way, starting with a bicycle to act proves that he is young, when he is dumb, actually played a disaster. i agree. well, you said what i wanted to say, and you said it, i just supported, so i wanted to give advice guys. what to him? it's just okay to walk without it. here are his movements to calmly climb. you understand him normally there, yes, in principle, if everything was honest, then after all, an old man, and even the head of the country, he should be unhealthy and vigorous, and they had such a wise president. he, yes, roosevelt told basil in the morning, of course he did. and what? so that 's bad, right? no, he was powerful. and by the way, i think he is still in the lead in

the nomination. uh, so to speak, the best presidents of america were elected. well, yes, indeed, after that after that they cut down this yes in the previous part went into heated discussion. poland, i don't understand one thing here. here, i cannot agree with the opinion that sounded that and in poland they were somehow very afraid of the deployment of nuclear weapons in belarus and changed the tone of the statement. firstly, i did not notice that it changed, and it was brought here in the studio. the old statements of prime minister marawiecki are quite in the classical polish spirit, and secondly, what changes for poland when there is an iskander equipped with nuclear weapons from fly from kaliningrad, in a straight line to warsaw 277 km, and there are much more of our nuclear weapons than in belarus therefore. i think this is a false thesis. eh, maybe, maybe, e what is changing, of course, the colonels and above of our general staff would tell, but i will just say one simple thing

that i understand, i loved geography since childhood. yes, firstly, the alignment of forces, and secondly, geographically compare the kaliningrad region with belarus, the placement of retaliatory strikes. well, all that follows from this once again i am not a single stability, but i i understand the difference between the kaliningrad region and belarus, i feel it physically , i look at the map and feel it. in addition, the kaliningrad region is an enclave and belarus no, at least these arguments. well, in my opinion , one of the neighbors in western ukraine in hungary, prime minister orban, is changing the situation very much. today, in simple human language , he told the situation, of course, uh, the ukrainian media exploded in criticizing him. he just spoke up. he said look you 're talking about what kind of attack. what kind of counterattack can you count how many people are needed there, more tanks, more planes, more, that is, it is

in human terms. he said that there is no way to go into contrasts, because this is death. it's just for the slaughter , you know, and the critics came. e hungary i believe that he is one of the remaining reasonable people who speaks the real thing briefly. well, you need to understand that no matter how much we considered the fall of the woad on the next one there, it means that this is real. i agree in many respects it is not specifically addressed to us at all organized. this show is part of a big american show. this should not mislead us, and who governs the country , how it is managed does it with the help of a large group of people who are quite competent and crazy at the same time. that's not biden. well, it's just decorative, because he says you can cut it out of cardboard and put it like you know, there are such advertisements. that's all.

and it will work very hard. that's what 's interesting, but the group behind him is strong this group wants to stand behind the president further, therefore, it is necessary that a democratic president be elected, therefore, it is necessary that in some way a sane person. i went to the polls, regarding, literally a couple of words about more than what they said, yes, and poles are poles not only poles, poles are romanians. many have learned from the placement not because they are afraid of a military threat. no. they just look at the issue of complexes. the last few months. moscow has taken a number of demonstrative steps that show that it starts as, to paraphrase putin starts already seriously. this is nuclear weapons. this and the way out. yes, all this is the application of combined strikes. a lot has been done in kiev, and they are afraid. next, what will happen? you know, we have discussed many times, here ukraine's desire to involve some additional countries in this conflict. but today i thought that in fact this is extremely

unprofitable for the zelensky regime. no, that would be beneficial. if this victory could be achieved in the short term, then yes, and if in the long term it turns into a process rendering services to the west, then there are big risks. actually, what will he live on? ukraine if the service in the war against russia will be provided by other countries, and it seems to me, here they have, uh, a rather difficult situation. and how does it all really fall apart? well , i heard linkin, yes, who began, so to speak, in uh in sheep's clothing to talk about negotiations. willingness to attract, there , and brazil and china we are ready to sit down at the negotiating table. i think these are not empty words. they are abandoned for the future. when, if the counter-offensive, which has been talked about many times here, does not go according to the scenario, then perhaps it will be necessary to sit down at the negotiating table. well, for sure, you still have to look for it. who writes the text. with whom does he sit down at the negotiating table and with whom will he actually need to negotiate? yes, i think that everything is both simpler and more complicated at the same time, because blinkin is contributing to the fact that they

have planned the so-called peace summit, where they will try to draw the untraced and neutral to their side countries. at least in some quantity, and for this, sheepskin is just right, it’s just for this and that’s what i need for today, i have everything right now, see the whiskey program and see you. on the tv channel rossiya vesti in the studio evgeny rozhkov hello, the main thing by this hour was evacuated from shebekino the film