to no avail, and at even greater losses for himself. in baku, macron was publicly accused of lying. the french president's claims regarding the refusal of azerbaijan and turkey to participate in granada are an example of hypocrisy. each of the participants in the event is well aware that it was the french country that opposed turkey’s participation in the meeting. the french president spreading false information on this matter is not an appropriate approach for a head of state. what to do with ukraine, another headache for the european union and a subject for german chancellor scholz understands that before expanding the eu to include new members, it needs to be seriously reformed. it is unacceptable to maintain the principle of unanimous decisions in matters of foreign policy or tax policy, as has always been the case. we must also be able to decide by qualified majority to guarantee the sovereignty and capacity of the european union. the netherlands are not even ready to consider it. the likelihood

of kiev joining the eu in the next 7 years. it was the thirtieth year that was designated as a certain exact date the head of the european council, charles michel, deliberately intercepted the political initiative of ursula vonderleen. in an interview with spigen, he said that determining the future of the eu is his prerogative. the head of the european commission did not like this very much. according to michel, it is he, as chairman of the european council, who plays a prominent role in foreign policy. the european council decides on the strategic direction. the commission is working on it. michel, on the one hand , accuses the commission of exceeding its powers, on the other hand, he himself exceeds his powers, promising ukraine accession to the eu by 2030, which in no way fits into the accession rule. a new spat between two leading eu officials has escalated their long-standing disputes, which have many times spilled over into public showdowns. if we recall the story of their joint visit to turkey in april of 2019, then in general the work of the entire european union was paralyzed for several weeks. in inkar

, ursula fonder was placed away from the men on the sofa, without providing her with a chair. i am the first woman as head of the european commission, i am the head of the european commission, i expected that i would be treated accordingly, but that was not the case, i cannot find any excuse for the way i was treated. two years later, another scandal between her and charles michel had to be smoothed over by other officials, the head of the european parliament roberto mizoli and the head of the foreign policy department. they think, but the timing is very vague. this is a political reference point. the purpose of setting a date is to mobilize political energy to start a movement, but this does not mean exact deadlines. i think it's time to talk to the european union to ask ourselves what we need to do. what now works for 27 countries will not work for 32, 33 or 35.

traditionally, everyone limited themselves to lengthy political statements, trying to save face with a zero result; decisions on military assistance to kiev also failed to be made, instead, as reported bilt, chancellor scholz, during one of the closed meetings, explained in detail to the participants why berlin does not intend to supply taurus to ukraine, noting the high risks of conflict escalation. the summit of the european political community, which brought together the leaders of fifty countries, is brussels’ way of attracting its own people into its orbit. political interests of new players, to whom you can promise a lot without giving almost anything in return, and keep them to yourself, but the current european union is not succeeding in this, its influence on the world stage is inexorably melting. anastasia popova, liya bernadkiina koshkina, european news bureau. well, this evening about the results of the european summit in granada and russian foreign minister sergei lavrov told our political observer alexander khristenko about zelsky’s few contacts at this meeting.

the support of europeans in ukraine is swelling, and everything is already visible there, no statement has been accepted at all, well, i went and talked with tikhanovskaya, that’s all, well, i didn’t notice anything else, another alarming signal for the kiev regime came today from switzerland, they announced a plan for expulsion 70 thousand ukrainian refugees, the swiss are even ready to pay if only the migrants would leave country. but brussels gives the green light to illegal immigrants who stay on the italian coast every day at the expense of the countries of eastern europe. our european correspondent tasya emelyanova talks about how the discussion of the migrant issue in granada turned into an international scandal. summits on migrants have their own unchanging traditions; they always end in failure and a tweet from viktor orban, who vividly, briefly, and quite censoriously explains why. brussels - legally... poland and

hungary, imposing a migration pact on them. so there will be no compromise on migration, neither today nor in the coming years, we will protect our borders both from migrants and from brussels. rape is a package of eight points, which was discussed until the night in granada, under pressure from italy, the main country for receiving refugees from africa, in the absence of the prime minister of spain and the chancellor of germany, there are few fresh proposals, they are all about money, assistance to countries on the front line, but most importantly does not change, migrants are something that needs to be shared in a united europe, but new batches of refugees must be accepted no one wants it anymore, neither hungary, nor poland, nor even germany, where mostly... please read the reports of the paris and french police, 70% is their data, 70% of robberies and crimes are committed by such representatives as illegal migrants. in sweden, the prime minister i spoke with is forced to send the army to help the police.

i spoke with many prime ministers, which is interesting, many of them agreed with me, but they are afraid of the dictates of brussels and berlin, we are not afraid. in conditions of absence. consensus border control, the simplest and most reliable means of doing something, inspection points on the border with hungary , slovakia opened on thursday night, they inspect buses, trucks, any vehicle where dozens of refugees can hide, something needs to be done, but life the police at the slovak border will show us whether we did the right thing or not, the same domino effect that slovakia warned its neighbors in the european union about, those that had already introduced. control, poland was the first, it opened 22 inspection points, stationed an army on the border, operational and engineering troops. the czech republic joined warsaw's decision, followed by austria, for now for 10 days, but in accordance with the rules of the schengen zone, the validity of this

emergency measure can be extended. the fact that pressure over migration is increasing in central europe is entirely the fault of brussels, which encourages migration and smuggling activities. boundaries. already available almost everywhere. france has not officially introduced border controls, but everyone knows that in order to get from italian ventimi to minton, you need to be patient. queues 10-12 hours, because half of those who sailed to lampedusa are unsuccessfully trying to break through there, sitting between attempts at the caritas charity foundation. most of it goes to germany, switzerland, and england. french-speaking, of course, to france. these are families from guinea and coddivo. a lot from sudan and eritrea. second-hand clothes from the church and pasta with tomatoes are not accepted with gratitude by everyone. after a year and a half, europe has learned to understand the difference between refugees and refugees from ukraine. it’s not just a matter of how they are received, where they settle and how quickly they print residence permits.

swiss authorities have come to the conclusion that maintaining the ukraine project is so expensive that it will be cheaper for the country to encourage refugees to return home for a reward. many have something to leave with, as financial times writes, words do not go well because of the state’s generosity to ukrainians who drive around their country in overly expensive cars. we are still ready to help poor ukrainians, but not those rich ones who drive cars that cannot even be found in slovakia. from lampedusa, meanwhile, no news. there is little respite in the mediterranean sea, the wave is too big. tunisia has put the brakes on sending refugees because of the weather, but when they start floating again, something concrete will be needed other than the new migration centers that italy is preparing to open. even if the guests are unexpected, you need to prepare for their arrival. the italian government has already instructed nine regions to find suitable structures, with two main requirements:

large capacity and location, away from populated areas. and with yamelya and anton chegaev. vesti, south european bureau. shameful scandal from honoring. the ukrainian nazi in the canadian parliament was brought down by justin trudeau's political rating. the canadian prime minister, according to opinion polls, is now supported by only 23% of the population. after trudeau, together with zelsky , staged an avalanche for the former ss man, the level of trust in him fell by a quarter. disgust with the prime minister reached the point that in toronto, trudeau, who wanted to communicate on the street with citizens of the country, was met with obscene armor. i won't shake your hand, you send our money to ukraine, you give money to the guy, who is killing his own country, you have heard enough of russian putin propaganda, it is impossible to listen to any putin in

canada, since you banned any dissent, this time trudeau could not blame everything on russia, he was raised with laughter, the crowd whistled loudly , he quickly sat down in the car left. in the united states, the ukrainian issue has already left congress without a speaker. and today another threat has appeared - the collapse of stock indices. markets are showing uncertainty due to fears that the white house will not succeed. with the republican majority and avoid the november shutdown. against this background , trump may become the head of the house of representatives, to the horror of the democrats. he has already received an offer. about what is happening now between the white house and the capitalist hill, in the report of our special correspondent in the united states, robert frantsev. donald trump is expected on capitalist hill for the first time in almost 3 years since january 6, 21, when his supporters attempted to storm the capitol. now. trump is coming to save congress from chaos from within, to remove congressmen from historical impasse after the resignation of the speaker,

amid a discussion of the question that, as it turned out, determines the fate of the entire american establishment, whether to continue pumping money into ukraine. trump said he plans to come to washington and hold talks with republicans to unify the party. i was asked to act as a unifier because i have so many friends in congress, they asked me to consider taking over as speaker until they... someone for a longer term, because i i'm running for president. trump even coquettishly posted a photo online of the speaker of congress holding a gavel, saying he was ready if necessary. for me, just for entertainment purposes, i would like to see trump as speaker, then we would have an ideal scenario: joe biden speaks, donald trump sits over his left shoulder and makes faces every time biden makes false statements about the economy , at the end of the speech, trump stands up, tears up the papers, and the next day conducts

the impeachment process against his opponent, this would be great from the point of view entertainment and for this show, after all , the prospect of becoming the third person in the state does not meet trump’s ambitions, his goal is the presidency. i'm not doing this because i want to, i'll do it if necessary, if they can't make their decision, the best chance of getting a post-ker will go to the chairman of the parliamentary legal committee, jim jordan. jordan's candidacy is a real nightmare for zelsky. on cnn, he has already stated that financing kiev is not a priority either for him or for the majority american voters. why should we send american taxpayers' money to ukraine if we don't even know what our goal is. we want to drive russia out of eastern ukraine or crimea, which... until we are told what our goal is, i don't think we

should continue to send money there, especially while we have problems on our border, jordan's competitor steve scullis, consistently supports arming kiev, the democrats are already looking new approaches to convince opponents of ukrainian issue, for example, to take measures to tighten controls on the mexican border in exchange for money for ukraine. among other options, the white house is considering the possibility. ask for significantly less funding for kiev, which is more likely to receive congressional support. the media is being pumped up. the ukrainian army will not last without help from washington. even as ukrainian officials put on a brave face and say support will continue, their blood runs cold with fear. they desperately need not only moral support, from the fact of receiving help from america, but more importantly, in the weapons themselves. europeans are not capable of this alone.

will it stop on the us side? talk about ukraine in general has not ended well for american politicians lately. nato should not accept ukraine into the alliance. why is this? because we made such a promise in 1990. and i believe that we will fulfill our promise. after a public dispute over the fate of ukraine, protesters in iowa attacked. car from the card of candidates for us presidents from republican vivek ramaswami, who consistently opposes sending money to ukraine. we walked into the building, there were a lot of protesters there, there was a lot of chaos there, so i didn’t see how our car was rammed. however, the police denied the politician’s version; they said that the woman driver simply backed out unsuccessfully, and joe biden also backed out on the issue of building a wall on the border with mexico. the white house gave the go-ahead... to continue construction, which has become one of the symbols of donald trump's presidency. thus

biden broke his promise during the election campaign not to build a single meter of barrier, the administration explained, the money was simply allocated during trump’s term and must be spent now. such irony: biden is completing trump's wall. i 'll answer the question about the border wall. money was allocated for its construction. i tried to reach the congressman. to redistribute this money, they did not do this, and the law does not provide for any other options other than using the funds for their intended purpose. for such a rapid changing the shoes of his main opponent trump reacted instantly demanding a public apology from biden. as i have often stated, for thousands of years only two things have worked consistently, the wheels of the wall. will joe biden apologize to me and america for taking so long to achieve this and allowing 15 million illegal migrants to flood our country. i'll wait for his apology. meanwhile, the crisis is