[000:00:00;00] revealed by the supreme commander-in-chief, no, i can reveal it, i have already revealed it, this state needs to be liquidated as a whole completely, since it cannot be denazified in parts, i just again see the presence of some excessive optimism, where there is this optimism, well, let’s now everyone will be crying pessimistically, there is no need, well, you want a person who by nature is in any sa... all international affairs, after that we will kick out of the studio all those who are happy that in ukraine everything is not going their way plan, then

to those who feel some kind of false optimism, who will remain, i say, i say, i’m not talking about this, that means, but about something completely different, about a more sober assessment of the situation, based not on this slogan of yours, let’s pessimism is bad, optimism is good, i’m talking about realism , about realism, this is not at all the same thing, realism, a criterion of realism, for example, such that we were told for a long time, we were convinced that after all we were olympic. movements can be returned back and forth, but finally, when russia had already sent hundreds, they finally decided moreover, he not only stood up to russia, said that these games that they will hold, finally, it seems, the cutoff has passed, i propose to build on the realistic ones, even if they seem bleak, to stage them anywhere, this will not

make the olympic committee ours in this program. there is no other, and i’m talking about the national olympic committee, the national olympic committee has nothing to do with it, bach has nothing to do with it, bakhov is the international olympic committee, no, we did it, i did it, i didn’t i’ll all be there, i just don’t understand what realism has to do with it, what kind of realism, your realism is like that, let’s send it, send it, then what? what is realism? well, listen to the assessments of some of our sportsmen so far, well, why listen to some, well, there are 150 million people in the country , you can always find some who you don’t like, well, 150 million do not have a platform, they have platforms, they are always journalists, representatives of the political ruling class . these stars - and others - famous people, they don’t sound here, they sound in the whole

country. on the whole side too, if desired you can find the entire television broadcast somewhere - this is not only your program, no doubt, but i am responsible for my program and spending time discussing what was heard somewhere in a marginal segment about something, well, you can do that, well why then did they discuss something here that was heard in some san francisco, because san francisco is not a marginal thing, but somehow, with 15 billion chinese, 350 million americans, the two largest economies in the world, it is now possible to organize a colossal ...in taiwan this is the third conflict that fundamentally affects us, this is a situation on which a lot depends on them, how the situation in the middle east will develop, these are two of the three nuclear powers, two members of the dream, that is, if instead we discuss an athlete who is somewhere something- then he said, well, okay, let’s do this, but there is a channel there called match, well, we can discuss it there, which means that we are acting too slowly, where

we could, where we could be more decisive and slower, based on the fact that often realism consists in that there are so-called self-fulfilling predictions, if we assure everyone that nuclear war is inevitable, inevitable, it can happen, it will happen, there is no doubt, it is necessary, but we must fight to prevent it from happening, why fight for the means? strange, a nuclear war solves a specific goal, not every nuclear war leads to destruction, how do you know, because we already had a nuclear war, two atomic bombs were dropped on the territory of kheroshima and nagasaki of japan, why is this not nuclear, this is an application nuclear weapons, you said every nuclear war and so on, every nuclear war leads to destruction, then this will not lead to the nuclear collapse of humanity, good nuclear, well

, any military man studies the issue, not the issue of nuclear, yes, both tactical and strategic, too, but there rsv, well, uh, argues with the whole chain of you, yours. reasoning, here, but you are talking about nuclear war as it happened, and you have come up with a tendency that not everything leads, well, this is obvious, basic knowledge of the subject and reasoning, this is not enough in terms of nuclear power in terms of power the charges that were used are already many times greater than what happened to heroshima in nagasaki, we saw this, the effects of radiation, we tragically observed with everyone, at least our generation in two cases. one on the territory of the soviet union, the other on the territory of japan, and by the way this did not lead to the global destruction of humanity.

so, maybe i will continue to finish, regarding nuclear war and the fact that experience has shown something, here i categorically disagree, but that’s not the point, i again say, i’m not touching there migration problems are already tired of discussing, but everything is not there , in particular, the fight against this, the european union needs to be pushed so that it falls apart, it is already pulling at the seams, again today there is outrage, the czech republic said that it froze there, symmetrically, i want to understand , what is the point in continuing diplomatic relations between the czech republic and the russian federation, given such behavior, we can break off diplomatic

relations with at least someone on our initiative, without referring to the fact that russian citizens live in the czech republic and we must protect their interests, here let it be they will leave there if, without interest, without the protection of russia, they cannot live there. they can live, let them remain, it is impossible, based on the interests of ten or thousands of citizens living somewhere, to restrain one’s own foreign policy, here i am, this is what i’m talking about, whether this concerns the olympic movement, some other international ones, more decisive actions, secondly, it concerns internal, external, or rather the last, internal external aspects of our life, recently actively and somehow not critically, that we stand for traditional values, the values ​​we stand for, who

whether they come together completely, all this, and serious progress in the implementation of the corresponding policy, we are already completely winning in all directions, this is exactly what i want to say, a more active policy... external internal, in my opinion, should be carried out, well since you challenge any of my proposals today, i’ll stop there. no, i listened to the end, i realized that we must move to complete isolationism, breaking off relations with all countries, this will help us, and we will also we must now organize a wild benz inside the country, trying to get into different communities, trying to say that your traditional values ​​are wrong traditional values. by the way, what are the traditional values ​​that are different in the north caucasus compared to the central zone, what exactly did you mean? this means that i didn’t talk about the first complete isolationism, so i mentioned everything, well, we are now

going to ruin the czech republic, we need to break with america, we need to break with finland , we need to break with the balts, they all bullied us, i named only two countries, also like this, i he said, start with at least someone, well, okay , why stop, you’ll come right away and say, not enough, not enough, two sides, what? through the czechs, here the problem is different, if we break off diplomatic relations, we will not be able to protect our property there, and this is essentially, and they have more of this property there, we don’t have them, arguments against this, i would like to remind you, in in the beginning, we shouldn’t have discussed the international agenda at all, because vitali tovic said that americanists don’t need it and stop talking about finland, and talk about the czech republic, well, i'm off, no, a second, a second, well, no, well, first of all, it's not the same, that means all the arguments. against, against, i know, he will demonstrate at least once, he says, and then the next one, the minister of foreign affairs, implement it, but that’s what they say, no, this is too delicate a question for me to answer quickly, well, you don’t seem to run, you seem to be standing in direct contact with

the studio, yes, san francisco is all grass in china, the facades are whitewashed before the arrival of big people, a special reception, the chairman of the people's republic of china, this one, san francisco, the chinese leader, yesterday there were also a lot of them on the road, it was interesting, by the way, to look at anthony blinken’s reaction, how he retired. we talked for 4 hours, but - biden would not have been biden, at a press conference, which in general went well, the prince who, uh, created this provocation, and maybe, uh, a dictator, again, blinkin’s face, such a boss, such boss, you have to work with someone like that, it’s very difficult to say, american analysts