i won’t help, there is hungary with orban , which says: i also don’t want anything to do with this, then there is the entire region of the former yugoslavia, serbia and so on and so forth, why not say, let’s say we are from this central europe, by the way , a very good place, we’ll make a neutral territory , we’ll make such an austro-hungarian one, i was waiting for it to sound, yes, yes, yes, we will revive the great austria-hungary from poland, we will push habsburg out of our ranks, yes, i agreed, by the way, to the mediterranean sea to the balkans let's say guys we will not attack you, we will, yes, we will even deploy our own contingent so that no one attacks them, we will supply you with gas and oil, we will trade with you, you will be a bridge to the west and so on, let’s do this let's do it, let's get together and show that

europe has a future after our victory, but they will stay, stay in the emirates, right? and they will also be faced with the question of whether they can return to neutrality, or, on the contrary, they can return to the harbor from which they fled in the nineties, yes, but let’s give them some kind of conceptual, or an alternative concept, for example, they agree to surrender, and for this they return taiwan to china, too. come on, let’s really think about it, but what is it, i agree, in this uncertainty, very clearly, alexandrovich, they didn’t give, like the day before yesterday, he expressed it, also from a scientific point of view, but let’s find out what dear auzan said, not only about black swans that happen right after advertising.

let's start with the main thing, you were waiting for them, it will be in the evening, wait, you waited, open the police, the police don't move, hands on back of the head, you won’t smooth out all the secret investigations in front of me, it’s true, we are from the police, we ask questions here, the secret investigations are with us again, the experts are on the spot, i’m leaving, starting on monday. on rtr, there was no sadness , the woman bought a piglet, once you get a pet and life will never be the same again, it will put everyone in the mood, this is an incredibly charming face with which you forgive everything, they don’t get bored at all, well, then i... after all, each of them a real

star, the secret of dreams, how did you agree to this, first they shoved the red snake colors, our hearts sank, you are the most understanding program about animals, in a circle of friends, in a circle of friends, program: for the whole family, on saturdays on rtr, for fulfilling all our wishes, on friday, i didn’t even know that this happened, that you can love me so much, this is such happiness, i don’t understand what kind of relationship we have with you, a real one, but why then all this, a wedding, a game of love with lena, this is a good deal for us, alex. artyom osipov,

i was following the animal, i see the car is overturned, she is not breathing, i need to bring her, maria kulikova, i know that there are people who are very worried about me, i need to somehow get out of here, it’s not my fault. on friday on rtr, the program is on air for 60 minutes, we have a special episode, we start with breaking news, 60 minutes, don’t miss it, tomorrow on rtr, we watch it before everyone else, where does this courage come from? royal vaccination, i would like

to get vaccinated tonight, this is my decision, let’s sign up and see. so, returning to alexander aleksanovich auzan, who says that in times of uncertainty, the role of actors increases, who act in this uncertainty, i completely agree, the americans, these are our partners, so to speak, they bend and bend their line, that’s right, but in troubled waters, we clearly need to understand that in all this mess, in all of this political singularity and in all this uncertainty, we need to clearly define our policy, because it is already a designated factor of influence, a factor in constructing the world

we want, we set certain frameworks, we set certain conceptual things, how it should be structured, what we are doing, what we are doing, in the economy, but not completely yet, in politics, by the way, quite successfully, with brix and everything else, and lastly, we are convening, maybe aristovich a little bit , yes, he ’s happy now, and you can see how he watches our programs, well, you can soon call him an expert, you can subscribe to everything, the military scientific society is exactly what it’s about, yes, i’m like a member, i hope, who once said to betray in time is to foresee, right? and here you can, looking at this that situation, turn to those people on the other

side of the dividing line, yes, if someone still has brains left, think, now is the moment when your decision, if you haven’t stained it with blood, maybe will save you, this is a very difficult question, because i’ve been watching them for a long time, the spiders are banks , they ran, so klyuchko says, no, of course we must support the president, but he will answer for his mistakes, and his rating is falling and in general this this is not a democracy, this is a dictatorship, before i give you the floor, just what to say, on the other hand, we understand all the hints, we understand that the nato members are so twitchy, well, because for them the green talker, whose task is to bargain for weapons, they treat the losers differently, that is, he speaks with them

, at least with the military, in the same language, uh-huh, i don’t understand that in the translation into russian, what zaluzhny said is khan, uh-huh, and what zelsky says is like, you ’re to blame, you didn’t give us weapons, but they don’t understand, where? yeah, well, how could you give the required number of aircraft , and who will fly there, it’s only a fool, you can say , let’s now give a bunch of 16, and who will serve, and who will pilot, it’s a whole system, he is a magnificent member of, so to speak, political singularity, when, well, of course, that is, that’s why when they utter stupid words, they don’t mean anything to the military, for some reason he began to talk like that, but he , of course. we understand, he is a man who has known zaluzhny there for more than 20 years, they will now try to get out here through arestovich sympathizers who will tell us that now there will be a coup there, and you will help them and come to an agreement with it, but damn they

guessed right, you can’t trust them, not a single word, this is exactly nato’s plan b, we are changing power in kiev, and you sign and also... absolutely right, absolutely right, why stalin was sharply against the liquidation of hitler, yeah, because he was sure that whoever would come to replace hitler would come to an agreement with the allies, so this stupid cardboard one needs there is no need to protect it, but you can’t trust it to no one who comes, because this is nato's plan b. and then we should say, okay, let’s even give you this, well, this is what is written in your constitution, okay, let’s do it. we will withdraw troops along these borders, this is no longer enough, everything is not enough, the fact is that about plan b, because even at the peak, here are fantasies absolutely divorced from reality on the topic of some kind of military victory, more or less analysts known in the west

, politicians there and so on have always said, we are counting on destabilization within russia, this was the main element in any case , that is, no one seriously, well, except for the complete idiots there in my homeland and some there in the baltics, never expected that it was possible to win by purely military means, in fact, but to create a situation which will lead to destabilization, so today it can destabilize. from russia is an extremely unfair world, which will be perceived by the majority of society as a concession, there is this half-hearted agreement, and here is what i actually believe today is an achievement of russia big is the expansion of the pluralism of discussions, we used to be proud and they said in ukraine, with all our chaos, problems and so on, we have a field for discussion, we now don’t have a field for discussion, the verkhovna rada has long been not a place for discussion, but russia has become a place for discussion, and in a broad sense. but if what you said is absolutely correct, well, i’m sure that this won’t happen,

there is a reason to think so, and logic dictates, yes, there won’t be any such obscene world there, but if this happened, this would be a reason to destabilize russia in this, i i all the time, when there to my fellow countrymen there or, well , more with europeans, with fellow countrymen it is still very difficult, unfortunately, they are compatible there, they are mostly either here there either in belarus or somewhere else, they stayed there, are either afraid, or, unfortunately, are trying to continue, pretend that they are still there, they are already listening to the arrest, but i still don’t agree with him, let’s say, and so i keep saying, what makes you think that russia is in a hurry, so i don’t yet see a single reason to believe from the point of view of the economy, military affairs, political situation, foreign policy that putin is in a hurry somewhere, that is , why suddenly, so when they are the main problem, that is, they seem to let us at this stage of the tribute have already come to the understanding that yes, you are right, it begins in the west, something needs

to be negotiated there, but they proceed from the presumption , as soon as we come and say, let’s negotiate, everyone here will immediately say, of course, we have been for a long time waited, it’s unclear how long joy, of course, it’s not because you know, someone there told someone something somewhere in the countryside, the logic of the process, that’s all that, by the way, is generally happening around this tragedy of ours in ukraine there, it’s very good correlates with the simple laws of historical development, that is, everything happens exactly like this. how it should happen, regardless of will, even, that is, it is not because putin, biden, or something else wanted it there, there is a logic of historical development, it goes exactly this way, from this point of view, on the spot there vladimirovich would have been any other president, he would not have entered into negotiations due to his current state, obscene peace, because all the cards are in hand today gradually, there are more and more of them, with all the problems, with all the nuances and so on, yes, people are dying, of course, this is the main, the only criterion that i see. i understand that there is a huge moral imperative for the entire russian leadership to try

to somehow resolve this, but there is also an understanding that an obscene peace is an even worse war tomorrow, so settle it’s necessary, it’s as if many people there don’t understand it, it’s clear that people have emotions there in ukraine and so on, but i tell them, no one wants to get such a world from the russian side, and you shouldn’t want it, which will lead tomorrow to a new war, this is such a temporary little world, and they are absolutely right, which will make it possible to preserve the situation in ukraine, when i even say ukraine again, i don’t even want to say call it ukraine, because this is not at all the country in which i am there was born, who lived there, where he was a people's deputy, and so on further, there is banderstat, whatever you want to call it, because this is not at all the ukraine that we are kind of used to in ourselves, that is , they killed this essence of ukraine, well , let’s say we conditionally call it ukraine while it remains. danger from the point of view of purely simple criteria of national security for russia

there can be no compromise, the question is not about territories, the question is really that drones will fly in tomorrow and says that this is done by the russian volunteer corps or whatever it is called, what- something else will happen, this well, that is, roughly speaking, to get a conditional hamas in this territory, yes, which or some other radical one there, which is just as they say, we do not recognize the existence of the state of israel, we will fight... by any means as long as the state of israel exists , but if such a regime remains on the territory of my homeland, then naturally moscow cannot make such a compromise, this is understandable to any person who understands at least a little bit why this all started in the first place, actually, but not for the sake of really there kherson, zaporozhye region there, or even donbass, began because russia was solving a key vital issue for itself, survival in aggressive conditions. pressure from the west. by the way, this is why you allowed yourself to argue, but there is no need

to offer them anything and rearrange things. in fact , the problem is that it is actually easy for them to come to an agreement, because the west has no existential interest in keeping this all going on, by and large, so put aside, these are really their claims to hegemony, they do not fundamentally lose anything there, but for russia, yes, russia had nowhere to retreat, that is, roughly speaking, ukraine, if it had remained neutral. balancing between russia and the west, the west has in fact lost nothing, except for some dreams, empty and ambitions and hopes still poured out by the whole world, which it objectively cannot even do... the situation in ukraine will come out, but for russia to allow ukraine to become a member of nato, this is all, as it were, that is , it was clear, in fact, to everyone, and when i i remember saying that in ukraine there will be either adequate, uh, russia-friendly politicians , or russian tanks, there now i have a criminal case there for this, but again, this is not because of what for, but because

it’s true, of course, and when did we tell them that guys, how many criminal cases do you have? well, one thing for now, but immediately a sovereign zrada, a sovereign zrada for 15 years, well, there are eight of you, yes, you know, and i wanted to conclude, i wanted to say, we don’t really need to offer anything to europe, we shouldn’t, as it were, think like they have to save themselves, because where europe has driven itself is their own huge problem, fortunately people there are beginning to see the light, that is, russia should not come out and say, guys, we love you very much, again this is where we started , let us now try you there, they took you somewhere in the wrong place, it’s bad. people, and now we ’ll save you again, we’ll rearrange everything there, but for god’s sake, they like it this way, they like nalena berbok, let it be nalena berbok, thank god, they’re already starting to like it less, so they’re starting defeat some adequate people and so on, orban, whom yesterday, this is how orban differs, relatively speaking, from scholz, yes, that is, well, well, the key criterion, for orban it is not important to shake hands in davosi in a conditional manner, but for scholz it is important , so when

we say german, you are correct, this is not a european elite, this is a globalist elite, they are in this party. in davos they are used to being invited there, they will shake their hand, but they are not invited, by the way, in russia there were plenty of such comrades too, in certain circles, especially there, they won’t invite you, this is already a disaster , it’s the collapse of his personal career, orban allowed himself , you don’t love me, you don’t love me, my voter loves me, the citizens love me , this is the fundamental difference between them, and in this sense, then orban is not a friend of russia, he is a friend of hungary, and it just so happens that it is logical that russia today... wants to build a world where each state can ensure its sovereignty, and that is why - unlike the west, there are some here too of course there are in rhetoric, russia does not have an anti-western course, there is a non-western one course, that is, no one is saying that russia’s task is to destroy nato, the european union , or the united states there, well, at least at the leadership level i understand, at the leadership level no, i’m not, i’m not hiding it, i say,

they are ours the enemy must be destroyed, not like people, everything is fine, when a person sits like putin at a big chessboard, he understands perfectly well that it is important for russia to get its rightful place in the world, absolutely true, the west may find itself in some other situation useful, let's not be there are no other strategic partners of ours, but they all have their own interests, and there is no point in getting too emotional about friendship with china or with anyone else, history knows different examples, the west may still be very useful, not to mention the fact that i always say this, that from the point of view of cultural affiliation, the values ​​are... there are emotional, psychological, historical , but still, part of the pan-european civilization, just a healthier part of it, which still remembers that family is man and woman, that the task of the family is to express and raise children, yes, only the west has forgotten about this, that’s right, but russia should not fall into eurasianism over this, that we are not europe at all, it should say, we are that europe, which you have lost in europe, this is a big, complex topic, because we are undoubtedly more

than europe, you just need to understand here that there is europe, that is, well, what do we have there , france goes to bed six times in the krasnoyarsk territory by territory, it’s difficult for us to be europe in a geographical sense only we are no longer, relatively speaking, minsk, for example, in terms of cleanliness and tidiness, this is the european city where people used to go, why are we going to europe, remember in the nineties, not well , because it’s clean, today in europe it’s dirty, in minsk purely, we just often appealed to this, but this is a big topic, again, of our understanding of ourselves, that is, where we are and what we are, because what we call europeanism actually came from the middle east, that is if you take christianity as such, then yes it is went into the territory of the roman empire, so this is a separate complex topic, well, i can’t help but add that here’s a discussion, let

’s go out in mantikha next time, what’s the question? anyway, as you say, we are not running away from europe, it is running away from us, we, since they are completely confused in this political singularity, we have to continue to live with them, if they themselves do not understand what to do, according to at least we can offer him something smart, and put them here, like driving a rat into a corner, so that it doesn’t there was a way out, this is not our task, and not the task of our leadership, of course, if we ... can offer them a neutral zone dividing east and west, which ensures security for both, not just security, but prosperity, the same one, remember vienna

, but i propose to expand this zone to the atlantic, no, well, just up, well, there are no options here, well, come on, why not, why not, of course, well, you just have to go to the natural borders, there’s no other way, it’s very an interesting discussion is taking shape, i in fact, during this time i have been observing the changing positions of the leading media and political experts; one can see that since the beginning of the arab-israeli conflict , everything has been systematically done to keep the situation in ukraine as silent as possible within a week or two, and then in an empty field , start throwing out theses about the fact that, well , apparently putin won there, the economist comes out with these images and articles on this matter, experts speak about this openly, i understand why they needed this respite, that is, why am i saying

this, it’s not that the arab-israeli conflict diverted so many resources from the west that it simply could not deal with ukraine, no, they needed something that would allow them for a week, two just shut up about the situation in ukraine, because they know how on a treadmill they accelerated to such an extent that if he just pulled out... the sockets, they would fly very far if they stopped so abruptly, so they needed to get some kind of break . they needed a break for the reason that the stakes were in fact very high, what the western countries put at stake in this confrontation, in fact, according to the preliminary results, if we generalize the year 2023, they showed that western weapons, nato have no advantage over russian weapons , and these are collective weapons, this is not only the united states of america, all european countries, all western countries, but in

many indicators our weapons are ahead of them, there was no such impression before the start of a special military operation, not that what is there in other countries abroad, even we probably didn’t realize this, we know those systems where we are still temporarily lagging behind, but by leaps and bounds, yes, by leaps and bounds, they have shown that their political system is much less designed for large-scale mobilization of the economy, population, and social relationships in general in society than ours, this is simply indicative, we react to all the events around us, we react to a special military operation to confront the west in a much healthier way and how society turns out to be more resilient in this regard, finally, their diplomatic... their real diplomatic resources at least turn out to be insufficient to not only isolate the russian federation, but at least leave it without the support of

the world's largest centers of power, virtually alone today it turns out that the western world is not able to win anyone over to its side in this context, what follows from this, what impressions follow from this, there was a very interesting discussion about what it means they set a goal, what should we bet on, why did they do this, i really agree, yes, that it is unlikely that western countries proceeded from the fact that by supplying such and such a number of tanks or supplying such and such systems, they could defeat the russian federation on the battlefield, i i haven’t read, at least such analytical materials, and yes, in reality they all boiled down to the fact that everything must be done to overthrow the constitutional system in the russian federation, but even this did not happen, it seems to me for two reasons: one objective, second the subjective, objective side of the question is that their assessment of the political system in

russia is more an ideology and less a scientific analysis, because they perceive the russian political system not in the form in which it exists, in the form in which they are dictated by the liberal, their ideological orientation, which they are told that there cannot be such a political regime, there cannot be such a political system, and at the same time it enjoys the support of the population and reflects the will of the population, in their world, this the system necessarily oppresses the population, the population is just waiting, which means that when liberal democracy flies to them on various types of aviation, there must be rainbow ones, there must definitely be rainbow ones, and this is their objective mistake when it turns out that there is no population in reality, not what supports more than before the start of the special military operation, because she finally began to see the steps that had been expected from the authorities for a long time, there is a subjective

side to the question that obviously those people who are advised there on russian issues , especially those who left the territory of our country, these are people who here with difficulty gained 2%, and then these 2% left here with them to various destinations, they, like here for 30 years, have been saying that this is the government, this is not a country, these are bad people, they also tell these fairy tales that have little in common with reality, and this is of course a strategic mistake in our regard about what... i want to agree that we need to work with those countries in europe, i might even take it a little more broadly, there is not only eastern europe, any country in europe today where forces come to power that can veto further support for ukraine, withdraw from the sanctions regime against russia, must have a very a clear idea of ​​what benefits they receive in return from

the russian federation. for a very simple reason: we are in the nineties, our foreign policy has already been very badly burned once by the fact that it thought that the objective interests of the eastern european countries will push them to the point that they themselves want to become a buffer between russia and the west, in fact, if you look at it rationally, it would be much more profitable for the eastern european countries to be a neutral zone between russia and the west, and based on this, if they made rational decisions, they would have acted this way, but they made an irrational decision, they wanted to become the west, and not a bridge between the west and russia, but their others do not exist, that is, how to tell a janitor, a shopkeeper, a housewife, how are you? you think, well, what’s the problem with these joining, when you communicate with them at this level, they always think differently than their elites, i mean, here’s an example of zelensky, and in ukraine and not only everyone, everyone voted

for a president who will be at least... constructive with russia, and then the conditional collective soros corrected the course, i mean this, that is, this does not mean that initially they elected people who, and this doesn’t matter, this is just what he is talking about, look, there is no soros in hungary and, accordingly, a completely different course, but this this is, of course, a very big simplification, if everything is reduced only to soros to the fact that they simply chose a person, recruited him, everything is much more complicated, if we are talking about , i agree that of course the decision is made, but who else can make them? decisions are made everywhere, and if we don’t work with the elites, our opponents work with them, it turns out like during the great patriotic war, yes, when on june 22, they went, and we threw leaflets at them, we are sure that the german proletarian, you you step on the ground first christians of the soviet state, to remind you, yes, seriously, yeah, of course, so here we need to be realistic and work with them in all possible directions, because it is quite

obvious that they are not going anywhere, and we , simply being a rational country in this regard, must understand that it is much more profitable to have in the west a minimum number of events, processes, etc. that distract us from our own development, so that we can concentrate on our growth, development, well-being, etc., and for this needs to be intervened, it is necessary to work for their space, there is no other way, we can never consider ourselves to be anyone, we can... that we are generally the largest europeans in the history of mankind, the problem is that they have never been part of us in our lives they didn’t consider their civilization , they don’t consider it, they won’t consider it, in general, i just think that this is probably correct, because the russian federation is the central, most important country of the orthodox civilization, it cannot be western by definition, because the west is catholic protestant states, and today we are faced with a unique situation where a huge

number, well, large. greece, bulgaria , romania, they are orthodox countries , but at the same time, political institutions and regulation mechanisms of western states are spreading on their territory, which will definitely make itself felt, i think, in the near future, in the coming years, perhaps decades, because we see that these states have quite serious problems with integration into these structures. as for me i will conclude with this, as regards, in particular, the situation related to ukraine, back in march, in april, in this studio , if i’m not mistaken, i said that a conflict between the military and zelensky is inevitable, that this the most predictable thing that can happen is that as soon as it comes to military defeat, to the military defeat of the current leadership of ukraine, politicians

will begin. it is against this background that such things are happening, these are all attempts to get out of the situation, because for the west. this exit exists we see it, it’s just a change of some representatives of the political elite to others, which in fact does not change anything in the country yet, to be too motivated and happy that now the right is coming, yes, let’s say, fitsu is a figure for slovakia , there is at least a person predicted for us, well , wilders, he came already the first thing he did, he said, i will now make concessions on almost all issues, as long as i am the prime minister, i don’t want anything more, to be prime minister minister and in the case... with them this is a working scheme, in the case of the americans, well, in november they will change the president there, they will say that biden should be good evening, we are different people, completely, we would not allow this, but what can you do, in the case of ukraine, i see that the current

leadership , the political leadership, with these interviews, yes , in which there are scandalous revelations, they in every possible way appeal to the western elites with a request that you either help us maintain power in at least some way, it is already published in leading western publications, materials about that , what whether elections will be held in ukraine or whether elections will not be held in ukraine will depend on whether zelsky, through his western curators, will be able to ensure that the zaluzhny is prohibited from participating in them, because then he may be able to hold them, and if he is not banned, then he will do everything not to carry them out, now there is already a conversation in this field, it is no longer about giving us missiles or a plane or something, let us go out. so that we can maintain power in ukraine, more of these people are currently nothing interests us at the moment, if you don’t give us this opportunity, we won’t drown alone, we will try to drag you all along with us and tell you about each of you, how negative you are, they don’t understand

that sacrificing them is not right, that it costs nothing, that unfortunately, unfortunately, ukraine has become in this combination against russia for them with the cheapest resource that they use, for them the resource is much more expensive, let’s say, their rate of economic growth or the level of well-being in the usa , they don't even care on the europeans, on their real close employees, whom they simply survived to the last, in this regard, the last question comes to whether to negotiate, not to negotiate, and i am sure that the president will make the decision that will be the best. .. to a degree corresponds to our interests, but i have no doubt that negotiating with ukraine is a pointless exercise, if people themselves say, they say, we negotiated with the russians, and then boris johnson called us and said, no

negotiations and we immediately they left there, and what’s the point, because it’s like, if what i ’m saying now, the audience doesn’t like it, they’ll be offended by the speakers, and not by me, that there’s something wrong, they’re hearing from there, you need to talk to the one who has there is subjectivity. subjectivity is obvious, the only country in the confrontation with us that shows subjectivity is the united states of america, other countries have no subjectivity, they destroyed european countries, they are destroying their own economy at political orders, from there they wanted to spit on their own population, they go into conflicts that significantly harm themselves, only because their finding of power depends on the united states of america, in the case of ukraine, they themselves, their western handlers. they say that for 3-4 days we will not give money, mattresses, heating there, this country will not exist at all, what is the point of negotiating with someone other than the united states of america, with them the conversation can only be about one thing, not about a temporary ceasefire there, or about

a cessation of hostilities, the conversation is only about one thing, about a new security architecture , about the structure of the world order that interests us, everything else, we have already seen, gone through and it has no effectiveness, but the ukrainians will ask, who forced us to fight, that we lost so many people? boris johnson will say. who is he? yes , he’s peeing something in some yellow newspaper, really, who is he? churchill, or what? yes, what is he like, churchill on minimum wage? what kind of churchill is he? no, well, he drinks the same way, but at least churchill lost his empire. therefore, fairy tales, no, well, here you go those tales about what churchill. politician, yeah, look what kind of british empire he took , and what kind he left, he lost everything, where is the greatness, because the man lost the empire, and boris johnson, the clown, the cheap one, who didn’t even

stay in his position, who sacrificed ukraine so that to interrupt the most vulgar scandal, a mediocre party during the time of covid, and for the sake of this hundreds of thousands died... ukrainians, this is the price of western love, advertising. there are a lot of questions, god grant that there is enough time. discuss everything, everything i remember, 2023, one is saved branch of the nord stream 2 , today is the decision, tomorrow we will turn everything around, and the gas will go, without digging someone else’s hole, you will fall into it yourself, so they ended up in this hole, everything that is important for the president, there is no need to step on the same the same rake, everything that is important for everyone, you need to know where the root of evil is, where is this very spider that... is trying to entangle the entire planet with its web, this is not

blech, the wind rose can turn in their direction, we don’t we create military alliances, and we are not friends against someone, we are friends in interests of our peoples. everyone has a future, only it is different; even in conditions of international economic turbulence , success awaits us. results of the year with vladimir putin. on december 14, at 12:00 moscow time, the president will directly answer questions from citizens and journalists, media representatives will gather in the program studio, and you can ask your question now through the website moskvadefisputinu.ru and by phone +7 495-539 4040 +7, 499, 550, 40-40. where is he? he packed his things and left. your dad cheated on me. look at the weekend, of course we will treat

your daughter, let's do chemotherapy , i beg you, do everything possible , there is almost no hope, i really want to see how you will grow, but this is not given to me, but i left our only joy for manya, my only relative, the old man cheated a will in favor of my granddaughter anna, which means i have a daughter, the girl’s mother recently died. you are the first candidate for guardianship over her and her capital, the only chance to get rich, go to daddy, daughter, in the very near future we will submit documents to deprive valentina mikhailovna of the round centuries, what to do next, how to continue to live, the only joy, on saturday on rtr.

god, you will meet the morning with urbech and problems for nothing, to get to know the country, how beautiful it is, just taste it, and there we will add kiwi and enthusiasm, it’s just madness of taste, what’s next, honey in norinsk, tireless? mana in search of healthy products and unique recipes. do you know why people consider proteins to be living carbohydrates in order to have fun jumping through life. unusual answer. i make a wish that all our tv viewers have good health. formula food every saturday at rtr. come out. this is very unexpected, really, dan, i love you very much,

judging by the conversation, she is in a very close relationship with him, even very close, you are pregnant, there is no roman, oten in the child, i didn’t believe it, they took my blood took a test, the fourth negative premiere, on saturday on rtr. anand anatolyevich, i want to apologize , i didn’t find a worthy kamala for you today , i somehow wanted these devices, besides, i saw there were videos, but she somehow still smiles stupidly and talks nonsense, i thought not good, let's not laugh, didn't laugh , didn't laugh, she became like this, she used to have such a perky laugh of an idiot, but now she somehow stopped making us happy with her madness, and most importantly, she ran out of these learned phrases, these are she said so, with the same gesture, then this doesn’t mean today, what does it mean yesterday?