alexander, we can park here, yes, but if we turn the corner, we can't park there, there's a transit zone for parking, let's try, let's try, this is the very edge of the restricted area, you can drive, you can't park, the point of the trip is lost, we try to park, that he writes, unfortunately, scooters are not welcome here, it's surprising to see nevsky free of scooters, until recently. the bars at all the metro stations and bus stops were filled with two-wheeled transport, the dense human flow was cut through every now and then by daredevils on scooters. the restricted area is huge, four historical districts, admiraltel, central, almost the entire vasilievsky island and petrogradskaya country, about 7,000 hectares, where there are most of the sights and where there are only sidewalks. the first to note the positive effect were doctors. there were quite severe fractures of the collarbone and long tubular limbs. and there were even fractures

of the pelvic bones, over the past week, almost no one was admitted. smolny did not come to the idea of ​​​​restrictions for scooters immediately, this summer three times. during the forums, economic and legal, as well as the naval parade, kick-sharing companies were prohibited from working in the center for safety reasons. residents asked to extend the ban. the city center is more of a pedestrian part. priority should be given to pedestrians. we have a lot of walking. tourist excursions, so when citizens on scooters start trying to enter a group of tourists, so to speak, it is not always safe and it does not always cause positive feelings. moscow has a different position. in some areas of the city , the speed of scooters is limited, but there are no plans to ban their movement or the ability to park. in the thirteen-million metropolis , 4 million people actively use the service every day. we

have configured the scooters in such a way that they comply with some traffic rules automatically. for example, they cannot accelerate faster than 25 km/h, and when entering recreation areas or places with heavy pedestrian traffic, they automatically slow down to 5-15 km/h. and yet, accidents , including fatal ones, do occur daily. here on pavilskaya a thirty-seven-year-old from yekaterinburg drove into postgai and died. here on belorusskaya a girl literally knocks down a pedestrian, in these shots a scooter driver drives away, having knocked down...

shoots, well, it's already the third bullet , it hits him in the back, bruises, but everything could have been much worse, here is the shooter himself, a year and a half ago in may, my wife was knocked down by a scooter driver, a young guy, 14 years old, he broke three ribs, she was in the pervaya grad hospital, after that you can see, well, it turned out the way it turned out, guys, forgive me, people often take out their anger at riders on scooters, throw them into rivers, onto trees, even onto rooftops, beat them, break them. this scooter will be written off, it has already served its purpose. each russian city tries to regulate the movement of scooters in its own way. in taganrog, they decided to take them off the street altogether, because there is no legal basis, scooters just appeared in the historical center overnight. abandoned personal mobility devices were found throughout the city, which were collected and taken away.

specialized parking, the entrepreneur has not yet contacted the administration, in rostov-on-don itself , the speed of scooters on the main street pushkinskaya to pedestrian was limited to 5 km / h. the service immediately ceased to be in demand. in kazan , scooters were requested from more than thirty streets, the world experience is also different. in paris, as a result of a referendum, the work of kick-sharing companies was banned. 130 euros per year from each rental scooter, all the same , hundreds of two-wheeled drowned people are lifted from the single-rail every summer. anna from ivanteevka, i also probably wouldn't mind throwing the scooter that hit her daughter into the river. they place these scooters all over the city here, it's a business. they do this and there was

an incredible speed on it, two people, i was wiping off the blood, i was with my child, all these screams, it was all terrible, and they stopped, and then once they drove away and disappeared from the scene. mom said stop, but he didn't stop, this scooter is somehow bad, this is the main problem, in the case of scooter riders' violations, the very principle of the inevitability of punishment is absent, whoever hit three-year-old zhenya will be punished anna doesn't know whether they are responsible, there is no way to identify the rider on the scooter, the traffic police officers for this small fine of 500 rubles at 12:29, there is no need to chase them... although such sharing companies are not very interested, as they say, nothing personal, just business. fines for scooter riders exist and are prescribed by law, but firstly, their size is microscopic, and secondly, in order to issue a fine, the offender must be physically understood, that is, literally by the hand. that is why they now want to introduce legislation

state registration of scooters so that cameras can read the numbers and automatically send fines to rental companies. kicksharing in moscow is currently operating under a similar scheme. scooters are tagged with large inventory numbers that are read by cameras, the city transmits the information, the company can apply sanctions to violators, but it may not apply them, it is not obliged to report. now our scooter can understand that two people are riding it, we issue fines and block accounts for this violation only if we have photo or video evidence. rental services in moscow began to equip scooters with helmets, introduced an adequacy test, and also acquired a staff of scouts, people who monitor violations of the rules, you can’t go drunk, for this you can get a fine of 100,000 and block your account, we also park correctly, only in parking lots, kick-sharing companies supported the idea of ​​the moscow department of transport to increase fines to 100,000 rubles for those who ride together and for transferring accounts to children, but most importantly, a law toughening

the punishment is now being considered in the state duma, the draft provides for a fine for drunk driving from 20 to 30,000 rubles for speeding from 500 to 5,000, for causing minor bodily harm from 2 to 5,000 rubles, for moderate bodily harm up to 15,000. another option is proposed by the public chamber - to equate an electric scooter with a moped. and then a driver's license would be required automatically, in the case of drunk driving there would already be liability in the form of deprivation of this license and a fine of 30,000. to just hang a fine, then it turns out not very reasonable from the point of view of, for example, electric bicycles. why? another painful question: infrastructure, an electric scooter is too heavy to ride on sidewalks and too light for the roadway, in case of meeting a car , the rider is almost certain to die, separate lanes are needed,

there are few of them, who should deal with the issue of developing bike paths? the question is serious, because it is expensive, there is a concept in st. petersburg, which is presented to the transport committee, its cost until 2030. rubles. well, for example, we build 25 per year for the construction of the metro. these kick-sharing companies do not pay a penny in city ​​treasury. now st. petersburg is trying to develop a scheme under which rental companies would pay for the construction of paths themselves. electric scooters are, by and large , older than traffic regulations. the first modifications, they were called autopeds, appeared in new york back in 1915, when traffic was not regulated by anything, only... 15 years later , traffic lights were invented. it is interesting to look at the newspaper headlines of that time. for example, a single devilish cart can add new horrors to the city life. in general, the mood is about the same as today. but the history of transport knows many examples when new things took root with difficulty.

and the cars and railways we are used to were also once perceived as the spawn of hell. history shows us that , of course, progressive ideas win in the end. that is, conservatives either convince them, or they convince themselves, if they still manage to promote this new solution, while all the advantages of electric scooters, accessibility, convenience, speed, pale in comparison to the nightmarish statistics of accidents, but if infrastructure is created and strict rules are developed, this type of transport could add not new horrors, but new pleasures to city life, vesti. and we return to one of the main news of the evening. as a result of the shelling of energodar from the ukrainian side , grodirnya caught fire. this is a cooling system facility of the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant. according to

the latest information, a kamikaze drone was used for the attack. the emergency did not affect the operation of the npp in any way. everything is normal. nevertheless, the infrastructure behind the npp has suffered serious damage for the first time. due to an attack by the kiev regime's armed forces, we have just contacted a rosatom representative, as a result of shelling in the ssu on the shore in the area of ​​the grad at the zaporizhzhya station. a fire broke out today, the ministry of emergency situations is currently working at the site of the fire, the fire is being eliminated, the operation of the station has not been affected by the fire at the moment, there are no threats, no radiation accidents, the station is operating normally, all six units, as before, are not working is in a state of cold stop, an unprecedented threat to the integrity of the station has been created, mr. grossi has repeatedly emphasized that there should be no violation of the integrity of the station in ... in the case that the city is burning, this speaks precisely of a violation of the integrity

of the stations. that's all for today for those who missed the live broadcast of our program, a repeat on the russia 24 tv channel after 23:00. we say goodbye on this, all the best, see you next sunday. a little later, sunday evening with vladimir solovyov, right now author's program nikita mikhalkov. pesagon. i welcome you, dear friends, to our next issue of the author's program besagon tv, which will be called where does a person begin. i think that you will understand why we named our program that way, but

as usual i want to first report to you that our previous program on the channel russia 1, on the channel russia 24, in social networks, vkontakte, telegram, odnoklassniki, zen and so on, was watched by more than 11 million people, which of course we are very happy about and thank you for your attention to us, i also wanted to - take a second to tell you the following: look, this is a list of our official besagon channels, everything else that you see in the telegram channel, on other platforms, these are scammers, extortionists, fraudsters who cannot be trusted, they ask you to subscribe, they will insert my photos, do not believe them, real resources, here are the ones that i just showed you, i cannot help but answer the numerous... questions that were asked to me about the olympics, you know, i do not

i want, frankly speaking, to dwell on this in detail now, because this topic has already been sufficiently covered, condemned , and so on and so forth, you remember what we are talking about, which seems to me to be somewhat encouraging, that not only we, not only in our country, are outraged by what people saw at the opening of the olympic games... in paris, but this affected a huge number of not only christians around the world, but also people professing other religions, remember this reaction in different countries, including in france itself. but you know, it's just sad to think that we live in a period of time where this could even be approved. all religions should be upset offended right now, seeing what happened.

disgusting, this is not art. journalists, what are we doing anyway, saying that these are public figures, bloggers and even athletes condemned the concept of the event, calling it a disgrace, a french journalist for the publication wrote about the opening ceremony of the games as a show and moreover brought. you know, as they say, in a russian proverb

god marks the rogue, you remember that when raising the olympic flag they first tried to raise it, it turned out that they were raising it upside down. this is a very interesting sign, it seems to me that it also has its own sacred meaning. do you know that according to the etiquette of state symbols, an inverted flag has several meanings. listen, firstly, it is an insult to the state of the nation, secondly, it is an international sign meaning that the country is in a dangerous situation. and asks for help. thirdly, the science of flags says that an inverted flag is a sign disasters or defeat in war. i don't know if it was done on purpose or not, but i'll repeat it to you, the god of copper is rogue. it was in this connection that, when the flag had already been hung correctly,

the witty internet users had this image: look, you know what it means. 666 is the sign of the beast, it is the sign of satan, by and large this is generally true, because it is absolute satanism, to mock the last supper for the whole world, it is punishable, maybe not immediately, but inevitably. but today i would like to talk about something else, and i think that for us no less important... than the olympic games, and by and large much more important, what is the basis of the future of the country, it is the people, it is demography, look at what the state duma deputy pyotr tolstoy says about this, listen, i will just say briefly that we want to ban the adoption

of children from russia by citizens of those countries where gender reassignment is permitted, and an initiative is being developed that... is aimed at improving the quality of medical services provided in the area of ​​providing services for artificial termination of pregnancy and an initiative is being developed in fact in the coming days it will be introduced to the state duma on the recognition of the right to life health protection before the birth of a child, this is very important, and our doctors are talking about this, thank you for your support, that's what's interesting, although the words spoken by peter ... tolstoy were met with applause, nevertheless, immediately there was an absolutely opposite, negative reaction to what he said. immediately there were concerns about a complete ban on abortions, about the middle ages, obscurantism and so on and so on and so forth. his proposal implies an amendment to paragraph one of article 18

of the law on the fundamentals of health protection of citizens of the russian federation and now. it will sound like this: everyone has the right to health protection both before and after birth, that is, it means that assistance should be provided, including to the unborn child, fortunately today medicine can do this while he is in the womb of the mother, and this is not, as it were, an operation that is performed on the mother, but this is an operation that is performed on the fetus, that is, another being.

individuals are completely different, they can be similar, they can be of the same nationality, skin color, eye shape, but they are individual, and therefore, each unborn person is just that - unborn, a new individual, a new unique creature, the highest creation of nature, but if we break away from reflections on universal human ethics, the results of termination of pregnancy, that is , this embryo, it can be used for treatment, salvation, even saving other people

from various diseases. but let's turn to the dictionary on biomedical ethics, here's what's written there: the ban on using an embryo or its tissue for biomedical research is based on the opposition...

we need mechanisms, we need a certain degree of scientific and medical freedom. obviously, at some stages it is possible to do so quite calmly. and it is possible to use aborted human embryos, so-called fetal cells are used, but it is impossible to obtain them without, so

to speak, killing the fetus, and a fairly large one, as is considered to have reached 12 weeks of its, so to speak, existence, i want to make a reservation right away, gennady tikhonovich sukhikh is a great professional, he is... a doctor of medical sciences, he heads the academician ulakov center for obstetrics and gynecology and perinatology, where his merits have been recognized by the state, he is a knight of the order of merit for the fatherland, he is a laureate of the state prize in science in 2022, and so on and so forth, he accepts the most difficult cases of his life, saves a huge number of people, his role is enormous in increasing the birth rate, he says something completely... fair, with which it is impossible not to agree, the so-called fetal therapy, it can save from a huge number of diseases, for example, from diseases

of the central nervous system, down's disease, parkinson's, alzheimer's, multiple sclerosis, kidney disease, male infertility, impotence, diabetes and many, many other diseases, and if you look at it from the point of view.

the fact is that research in the field of embryonic stem cells is associated with something controversial, the right to decide whether this pregnancy will develop or not, belongs to the woman herself. tell me, where is the ethics here? is it ethical to flush biologically invaluable material that can not only save, but also revive another life down the drain, it is absolutely fair.

sewer, but here the question arises: why were 2 million abortions performed? and what number of these 2 million abortions were mandatory, necessary to save, say, a woman's life, here a conflict arises between in the cause-and-effect relationship, you understand what i'm talking about, let's now

look at how this law. number 180 fz correlates with article 17, paragraph 2 of the constitution of the russian federation. look, the basic human rights and freedoms are inalienable and belong to everyone from birth. that is , legally, a child in the womb of the mother, he is not considered a person. his rights are protected from birth, that is.

pages and even the translation is so crudely done there unsuccessfully there these you know how not in russian everything from there sits uh jeffrey sachs uh sat under yeltsin that's what they did and what did they do on this for russian for citizens or something in favor of citizens worked no they worked for the benefit of - the west for their own benefit given that in september.

1993 of the same, anticipating what was written in the main law, our leading scientists prepared a conclusion, it is dated september 3, 1993. from the point of view of modern biology, genetics and embryology, human life as a biological individual begins from the moment of fusion. the formation of a single nucleus containing the nuclei of male and female germ cells and unique genetic material, it cannot be likened to an organ or part of an organ mother's body, so it is obvious that abortion is a deliberate termination of human life as a biological individual.

look, just... professionals and so on and so forth, but what do ordinary people think? moreover, this survey was not done in the middle ages, not in the last century, it was done in 2024, here is the opinion of people, the opinion that a child before birth is already a person, is held by 77% of russians, 72% allow abortion only for medical reasons, according to research by the institute of sociology of the federal

scientific research... no, that she simply must at some point allow another person to appear in her body, he grew for 9 months, i cannot imagine this, and i cannot, so she lies down and says: now is the very moment when i will give birth to a person, and there was a person inside me for 9 months, he lived in me, a living person, small, that is, she walked all the time... a person, you understand, can you imagine, in a woman a person, a living one, not just some kind of organ, but simply a living person in you, he pushes around there, can you imagine what goes on in a woman's head emotionally, then she gives birth and says: it's him, and you, she takes it, we know each other in principle, good, good day, and

what can you do to a man more powerfully, cooler than a woman giving birth to a person, i just can't imagine, nothing, i really want you to understand me correctly, there is no talk at all about such a thing... there is a ban on abortions, that's not what we're talking about, we're talking about individual attention to each case, if i may say so, especially since we have world experience, very serious experience, abortions are completely prohibited, for example, in andorra, honduras, nicaragua, el salvador, malta, the philippines, the vatican in a huge number of countries, aburta is prohibited, except in exceptional cases, most often these are... medical indications in venezuela, egypt , indonesia, iraq, iran, liechtenstein , micronesia, mauritania, the united arab emirates, algeria, brazil, bhutan, qatar,

costa rica, mali, morocco, monaco, libya, nigeria, peru, poland, saudi arabia, uruguay, chile and many, many other countries, these issues are resolved in a very clever way in the united states of america.

farmers who feed america, they continue to live by their own laws. this, by the way, can become a reason for very serious problems within the united states itself. elder pais and svyatogorets, a monk of mount athos, who was canonized by the russian orthodox church in 2015 , said that when the state takes responsibility for committing an abortion, then...

automatic rollback of the country to the level of an ordinary agrarian power loss of any chances to form any significant sovereign geopolitical contour, that is

, in fact, exactly what those who want to destroy our country are trying to achieve, but only without any bombs, without blood, without violence, with their own hands, and now... this issue is being raised at the official level, listen to what our president's press secretary dmitry sergeyevich peskov says. every year there are fewer of us, we live in the most... this is what peskov says, while in order to

maintain the population, at least at one level, the coefficient must be 2.1, almost twice, and why are we so calm about this, because the level of population decline in our country is maintained precisely due to what, due to immigration, and this somehow relaxes us, if you look.

assimilated by migrants, not the indigenous population assimilates migrants, what do we hope for, on the contrary, can this suit us and the remnants of the indigenous population , i want to be understood correctly, it is naive to assume that, for example, a ban on abortions can solve the demographic problem, absolutely not, but i am trying approach this. from a slightly different angle, because the danger is not in the abortion itself, the danger is in the flow, in the conveyor belt, in getting used to the attitude towards it as a natural thing, to the lack of respect for that very life that has not yet appeared in the world, but it already exists, it is given by god, that's what we're talking about you...

is given by the offer of some other alternatives, that is, the only alternative is to simply give birth, give birth and give birth, they explain, oh, how good, this is, of course, your main goal in life, and if you don't give birth, it will be terrible, how wonderful, how great, then it turns out that it's diapers, that it's sleepless nights, that it's problems everywhere, from the moment of birth to the maternity hospital, where they bully you, yell at you with god knows what methods, yes...

about the horrific things that happened during the war and how after the war the front-line soldiers were not allowed to tell the truth, they created tame veterans who say:

it is written that such and such a deputy, here some draft law appeared and immediately to them in the office, so if they said to adopt it immediately, then it must be forgotten forever, and if they don't say, then it's disasters cannot be touched, they must be adopted in three readings at once, just right away, automatically, and pay attention to the posters that ms. idelman uses in her speech, and these posters really... there is, by the way, generally about advertising, this is the kind of advertising that deputy yana lantratova saw on the streets of moscow, this is how she assessed it in her telegram channel. i don’t know who approved this advertising, but doing this at a time when the birth rate in the country

is at a terribly low level is a crime. at first glance, the topic is understandable and correct, men defend their homeland. their parents, children, they are our heroes, and how will a woman, a mother, perceive this picture , today, save the child, do not have an abortion, and tomorrow he will go to war, so what is this, a mistake of the performer or an order and who benefits from it, and do we not feel some kind of specific very psychological impact on such a subconscious level, as if by chance, as if, as if so... just by chance, as if even nothing special, this is what we talk about all the time, this is what is about those who ready to open the gates of the besieged fortress from the inside, and you listen to what the doctor of the university of toronto, scientist and writer ian garner writes about our country,

three cute white children, another one is on the way, icons on the walls, dad serves in the navy, russia is full of this terrible ethno-nationalist, fascist iconography, i know that what i just said is being bleeped out, but i have no other words, that is, think about it, a happy family of three children, the wife is expecting a fourth child, the father serves in the navy, an orthodox family, judging by the fact that the icon on the wall. and all this together, this bastard named ian gardner, calls fascist iconography, that is, a mockery of the last supper, at the opening of the olympic games, transgenders who grimace in front of the statesmen of all the guests

invited to the opening of the olympic games in paris, a man calling himself a woman in the boxing ring who beat up real women, swimmers who hide their genitals because they stick out and so on, this is all normal, and a family with white children, with a pregnant wife, and a military father icons - these are fascists, that is, you understand to what level the hysteria about us reaches those who...

it follows the testament of, you know who, the fuhrer's personal secretary, martin bormann, who said the following: the slavs must work for us, to the extent that we do not need them, they can die out. the reproduction of slavs is undesirable, they can use contraceptives and have abortions, and the more the better. and is n't that the answer? that is precisely why after stalin issued a decree in 1936 about abortion ban, they were... allowed for a time, you know, when during the great patriotic war in the occupied territories of the german administration, it was

the nazis who put this issue on the conveyor belt, to decide who should live, who should not live, who is needed, who is not needed, who is important, who is not important? listen to the interview with inna yambulatova, she is the secretary of the hippocratic medical forum, unfortunately, due to our timing, our time, we cannot... show it in its entirety, so we will show only fragments, but i highly recommend watching him entirely, well there was a man with a mustache who believed that poor ugly schizophrenics should be sterilized, or better yet killed, and those they conceived should be destroyed in the bud, as he said, well , actually, do you like this kind of morality, it was his fight, it was the third reich, yes, it was adolf hitler, it was the t-4 program, by the way, a very serious one. the annerbe t4 program, which was ideologically justified, and actually implemented,

moreover, we encounter the first concept of surrogate motherhood in t-4, when m forced insemination of a woman, one gives birth, another is given the child to nurse, a third is given the child to raise, i am not sure that many of those who are broadcasting today, should poverty be alleviated, that they would have survived in this program at all, under this program, the majority would have been destroyed. well, let's go back to history: stalin dies, and my namesake, nikita sergeyevich khrushchev, on november 23, 1955, issues a decree lifting the ban on abortions. why did he do this? this is very interesting. look, there is evidence from one of our intelligence officers, working in washington in the seventies, oleg vladimirovich pilipets, who received from the former ambassador of the united states in...

with western countries, the three most important ones are the reduction of armed forces, condemnation of stalin's activities, lifting the ban on abortions, and as we remember very well, all three demands were met, and the key demands are: the reduction of armaments, that is, the weakening of the country, condemnation of stalin. that is, condemnation of the one who was the leader in the victory over fascist germany and

the extermination of the population through abortions, this is what we had to do so that we could sit in the hallway of one of these three countries, and note that these countries themselves were in no hurry to settle the issue by conciliar, for example, great britain... abortions were legalized in 1967, in the united states in 1973, but in 2022 this law was repealed and legalized only in certain states, and in france abortions were legalized only in 1975, look at what an amazing coincidence, so who demands that khrushchev allow abortions in 1955? who writes us a constitution in 1993, in which the protection of human rights begins with his

birth, but not before, and it is very interesting, how do they justify, say, the absence of children and the unwillingness to have them in today's world, to breed poverty, poor conditions, nothing to live on, which is largely fair. but it turns out that this is not the only reason, look, south korea, the most prosperous country with a very powerful gdp, a prosperous country, as we know, at the same time can you imagine that in 2023 in korea, 57% of strollers were bought in south korea for pets, with which... happy couples walk only 43% for a baby. in korea today

, the birth rate is 0.72. this is. this is the lowest rate in the world in one of the most prosperous countries. how can we explain this? i do not know, but it seems to me that this is the hypertrophied egoism of humanity, the greed to share benefits with someone new, the desire to improve personal life at the expense of the life of another. today's person to have everything at once is an artificiality into which our entire life, artificial intelligence, artificial meat, artificial men, artificial women, artificial distance learning, you can exist in this artificial world and feel great, i want to remind you of one

small episode from our film a few days ago: oblomov's life, about naturalness, look, his life is subordinated to a goal, to work, not a single unnecessary action, an unnecessary step, a word, here he is healthy, rich, at 60 he looks younger than you, and why, andrey, at 60 you need to look 60, not 35, right, only then at 35 you don't need to look 50 years old, like you, ah andrey. well, your gold miner will live another 100 years, earn another 100 pieces, but what for? everyone thinks only about how to eat, what is harmful, what is useful, what doctor to be treated by, what waters to go to, everyone thinks only about how to live, but what for, no one wants to think, and this is

a wonderful common phrase: to live for yourself. and what does this mean? isn't this the very thing we often talked about, when the quality of life is determined by the number and the quality of pleasures in this life. remember aleksandr sergeevich pushkin, who wrote these lines at the age of 35: it's time, my friend , it's time, the heart asks for peace, days fly by, every hour takes away a piece of existence, and you and i together... we assume to live, and look, we'll just die. didn't pushkin live for himself, creating his great works, including these strict ones, because living for himself, it turned out that he lives for entire generations, and for centuries. well, okay, look, for example, at students who study at obstetricians and gynecologists are taught to perform abortions

in the sixth year of sub-internship, it is mandatory. the training stage is absolutely correct, because there are circumstances in which they must be able to do everything, but with all this, with all this, it seems to me that in the same academies there could be courses that teach the doctor to try to help a woman save the fetus, and not just help get rid of it, because if this were the case, there probably would not be such a... fact, such as, for example, the fact that for 30 years since 1991, only in state in medical institutions, 50 million abortions were performed, think about this figure, from 1920, when abortions were allowed, until 1991, very approximate.