[000:00:00;00] the security council resolution is part of international law, so we talked about it today and i honestly have known each other for a long time. we have a good partnership. i think this is the kind of conversation. it is impossible to try to postpone and postpone. we are now at a stage in the development of international relations when the moment of truth arrives. either we will all resign ourselves to the fact that someone alone with a group of their satellites decides how humanity will live, or humanity will live on the basis of the un charter, here, in fact, a very simple choice. nobody wants any wars. god forbid, but it is imperative to present arguments and demand answers from those who violate the astrophone. and i assure you that more and more countries, especially countries with their own

history with their own culture and their civilizational heritage, but they want to take just such a position, because once upon a time this conversation must be inevitable. i really hope that it is he with her roots. the charter of the greatest document of all times and peoples will play such a catalytic role in the development of such an honest dialogue, i repeat once again, without ultimatums, without threats and without attempts. it is the power to solve problems, including the power of financial and economic. what else do our western colleagues have, er, by abusing their position in the world system. well, i think it's already just limitless, as far as negotiating decisions are concerned. yes, we are for negotiated solutions. as you know, we are immediately after the beginning of

march. uh, president zelensky proposed negotiations. we agreed. but the way she behaved ukrainian delegation at the talks. as president zelensky himself has already behaved, refusing, uh, to confirm what they received a week ago. new proposals, i spoke about this more than once. this, of course, is depressing. apparently, they are not particularly interested in negotiations; they rely on what they have been promised now. uh, those who urge e not to give russia and win, and vice versa, those who call to defeat russia and destroy russia, that they will continue this line by pumping ukraine with weapons in huge quantities. a i if this continues, of course, negotiations. it is unlikely that they will have any result, but i repeat, once again we are committed to a negotiated solution, and we are committed to a ceasefire, which we are

doing, every day, announcing humanitarian corridors that are ignored, in particular, those who settled in azov became militants, militants of the battalion , azov who walk with a swastika with emblems. symbols of the nazi ss battalions vafan ss and about which, by the way, president zelensky answering a question from a cnn journalist, i think he said, well, we have a lot of such battalions. they are what they are. here is the phrase they are as they are in the interview. they cut it out completely it seemed, it's still a shame, but to present a person with all his hidden thoughts to the western democratic community. that's why we are ready to negotiate. if someone has an interesting idea and we will be ready to listen to them, and mediation as such. well, at least now, at the

previous stages, the ukrainian negotiators did not speak . we are our team meet together. well met on the territory of belarus three times, and once met on turkish territory. these are platforms for negotiations. we are recognized. and tema to others for their hospitality for organizing these negotiations. uh, but uh talk about mediators at this stage, in my opinion, it's too early. we want to get an answer to the latest version of the draft document, which we submitted 10-12 days ago and about which the ukrainian negotiators did not report to their president. at least a week later, he was not aware that such a document had been submitted. thanks because the secretariat was mentioned. i want to say that the secretariat fully respects and

implements all the resolutions of the general assembly and security councils today, if i feed them about something, it is that it did not allow them to be part of the norman format in order to follow the implementation of low ones. create a very clear view that the minsk agreement did not work, on the other hand. i would like to say that i understand that the russian federation has many claims. however, it provides for a large number of mechanisms, in which it is possible to consider similar concerns, namely through the appeal of an international court, as well as other mechanisms that

are provided may change the ukrainian troops are not located on the territory of the russian federation i confirm please lenta.ru. good afternoon, valentina shvartsman ribbon of the hand, if i may have questions for both speakers, sergey viktorovich, as expected later today in the un general assembly, a vote will be held on the draft liechtenstein resolution in the right of veta , which is supposed to be the language of the general assembly every time one of the countries of the five permanent members, the security council imposes the right, a veto, this is how moscow evaluates such initiatives and how, in general , the russian side refers to proposals for reforming the security council and in particular initiatives that involve the abolition of the imposed veta in the event of a if ah well after

the appropriate vote in the general assembly and without let mr. mr. gr. how do you personally, and how do you think the un secretary general, is it necessary to reform at all mechanism is right, thank you very much. as for the resolution that has been submitted to the general assembly? it is clearly stated that it has nothing to do with and will not affect in any way the negotiations that have been going on for many years on the reform of the security council, and the right of veto will not go anywhere. i can responsibly confirm this to you, and the right of the century is one of the supporting pillars of the united nations, uh, without it, and the organization will go to pieces, because uh, the great powers are permanent members of the site security, of course, and above all rely

on the princes. the unanimity that has been concluded and which allows avoiding sharp clashes between them is another matter that now the world has become different, they want it. here the americans publicly declare this to be unipolar forever and ever. but, uh, the objective process is going in the opposite direction, the world is multipolar, and we have said more than once that the security council must get rid of its main defect, the dominance of one group of countries out of 15 seats, 6, and belongs to the western countries and their allies. of course, developing countries are not well represented and we have repeatedly stressed that we want to see representatives of asia africa latin america in this body on an ongoing basis directly mentioned our

partners from india and brazil in particular, but there must be a candidacy from africa therefore, here is the resolution that was mentioned, which involves the discussion at the general assembly of the situation that arises after the application of the powers in the security council. she doesn't related to the reform process. uh, in general, it is aimed at democratization, but decision-making and we are ready to join consensus, if it develops, it is very important to work on the basis of consensus, because many of the resolutions that are adopted even by a minority of votes, then sometimes begin to prevail on those or other directions beneficial primarily to western countries, but, frankly, i would go even further. uh, the security council may be deprived of the opportunity to adopt a resolution not only as a result of the application of one

or multiple branches, but also as a result of abstention while voting 6-7 countries. this is also a case when the security council is split and, probably, the general assembly should not remain indifferent to their situation. so, yes, i think that this is, in principle, uh, a healthy process. and if a country uses this, it means it has a way to explain its vote, and uh, well, in those cases, when it comes to the russian federation, we will probably be able to explain such cases convincingly, and those or our other positions that we hold in the security council. if i can explain the

reasons why this right was created, the veto in the bylaws many years ago. this is to avoid a situation of confrontation between members. all this is security between permanent members and such a contradiction could lead to a global war. it was an element that prevented such a situation and also understood that the passage of time was important. the positions of interests of this or that country of a permanent member, therefore i am a supporter of a moderate use of the veta right, but i don't know, i don't know, i don't think it will be possible to get a majority, 2/3 in

the general assembly in order to change this right, veto, and have all five countries agree on it somewhere. i think that the security council needs to be changed and reformed so that there is a fairer representation, for example, africa, because africa was a victim of colonialism, firstly, secondly, as soon as many countries are dependent. they got independence. it was already formed into international institutions and organizations. that is, they are not represented before, because all this was formed before them. therefore, i believe that in many areas. i finish with this security we see copper representation. uh, developing countries, i need to change my questions to the minister. lavrov ah. first question. please tell us how russia responded to the ukrainian side's proposal to

hold a special round of talks on the territory of mariupol. the second question. and how what measures are being taken by the russian side in in regards to the build-up of the americans did not put to arms kim thank you yes, i heard about such a theatrically presented proposal of the ukrainian negotiating team. here is the team that communicated with our negotiators in belarus in turkey and then hold the next meeting in mariupol right at the walls via video conference. azov steel. well, i can say that the theatrical gesture is really ukrainians love to stage everything, apparently they wanted to. uh, one more heartbreaking scene to stage, if we are talking about serious attitude to work. as part of the

negotiations, it would be better if they quickly responded to our proposals, which i have been repeating for more than 10 days. how they are on their side, which, as it turned out, even zelensky had not heard about. yes, supplies of weapons to kiev well, not only the americans supply weapons, they prefer to force europe to do this, although they themselves also take the appropriate steps, and we have said more than once that as soon as foreign weapons are on the territory of ukraine a this is a legitimate target for our special military operation our troops on the territory of ukraine our troops defend the rights of people who have been bombed for 8 years and regardless of who was in the normandy format or not

, they were all silent. including germany from france as the authors of the minsk agreements all these years, the entire russian-speaking population of not only the donbass, not only the two republics proclaimed, but also, uh, ukraine as a whole, was subjected to cruel oppression. and look, it's all there. uh in statistics. what laws were adopted in relation to the russian language in relation to the media in russian, and not only russian channels were banned ukrainian channels were also banned if they were in the hands of the opposition parties of the parliamentary legitimate legal party. well, and much more, then the decision was finally made to ban the russian language in everyday life and once again emphasized the nazi ideology and practice was implanted. everyone shyly hid their heads in the sand both inside

the norman format and outside the norman format. format. and those weapons were weapons that were already imported to ukraine at that time. they really posed a threat to the russian federation military bases, which in particular the british built on the sea of ​​​​azov, directly posed the same threat and unfortunately, we did not hear about any sympathetic voices, and from various parts of the world, when e he was already as a last attempt last fall invited the americans and nato to conclude treaties aimed at ensuring security in europe without resorting to expansion membership of military-political blocs. right now we are dealing with the elimination of what threats and the elimination of those actions that the west has taken in

violation of its obligations not to strengthen its security at the expense of the security of russia o loaned 1 diplomat from the taliban government. please tell me, does this move towards recognition of the taliban government in kabul and the second question. is russia ready to work with internal afghan political forces? in the department of their involvement in the new inclusive afghan government, as recently proposed by iranian president ibrahim lynx and mr. kuterishu's questions. and how can you comment on, uh,

the illegal expropriation of russian diplomatic property in the united states, as well as washington's abuse of host status , when a number of diplomats, including russian ones, are often denied visas to participate in events, he, what steps and action is being taken by the secretariat to involve the united states in fulfilling its international obligations and, secondly, to afghanistan. you urged the us to release afghan assets in order to avoid a humanitarian economic collapse in the country. what steps have been taken in this direction? thank you. we did indeed accredit, uh, one diplomat who has already been sent to moscow to work in the embassy of the new government, the taliban movement. and this does not mean

official diplomatic recognition. we are here e, we are, as it were, in e muson. er, acting in unison with afghanistan's key neighbors recently. we had a representative conference in china in which we participated together with the central asian countries and pakistan iran and we work on the basis of recognizing the realities that have developed we have regular contacts with irrigation through our embassy through e, representatives of our departments, which, among other things, consider issues of economic cooperation, i note that during the period of the soviet union's stay in afghanistan, more than 140 enterprises were built, which became the backbone of the afghan economy. well, i’ll also indicate in parentheses that for 20 years of stay. there, the nato coalition has not built a single such enterprise, everything came down to it.

only k. well, you yourself know what it was leading to and how it ended. therefore, we want to lead the matter towards full diplomatic recognition of the new authorities in afghanistan, with the understanding that they will fulfill their promise and create an inclusive government. not only set on confessional point of view, because now they have uzbeks and tajiks and khaza in the government but they are all taliban politically, but it is precisely political inclusiveness that should determine our next steps, especially since the taliban once again proclaimed such their goal, we are working with the political forces that are in afghanistan in kabul, first of all, there, both the former president korzha and the former senior official gave it away, they are interested in the dialogue of katalia, they would also become in our contacts with the movement.

taliban. we, uh, encourage them to have such a dialogue, uh, which means that u continued in a substantive way. as for afghanistan will start with afghanistan, we decided from the very beginning to actively cooperate with the taliban and we carried out a large-scale humanitarian operation in afghanistan, but we understand that this is not enough in the absence of liquidity and cash , disastrous consequences for the people of afghanistan, we say that the international

community should create un conditions usd 500 million we are pushing the world bank to he releases the agreed amount of liquidity to afghanistan as quickly as possible, and we are working with central banks and the us treasury to remove the hurdle that still exists, uh, in terms of unlocking the reserves, which we hope to be today will, the practice of all countries that have frozen assets. we really believe that everything should be done, perhaps for the benefit of the people of afghanistan, and we are also seriously interacting with the talibon regarding the creation of an inclusive

of all the grasping government. also, directing men and women and uzbek tajiks. in order to cure the process in afghanistan, it developed so that there were no tourism manifestations inside and outside the territory of afghanistan and there was respect. respect for human rights two issues are of particular concern to me. the first is the opportunity for girls to go to school, especially high school and university after university. there was a negative decision recently. i hope it will be changed, as well as women's rights to work as representatives of different professions in this

country now female employees work in the territory. i hope that all member states. including the russian federation , visa requests will be processed as normal business as usual. this is necessary for uninterrupted operation. and i hope that the strange understand the whole country. we will reach an understanding. this is what we have with diplomats. such is the manner. it was a live broadcast with a press conference following the talks between sergey lavrov and the general united nations secretary antonio guteris. vladimir putin

today presented state awards to the russian winners of the beijing olympics. a solemn ceremony was held in the kremlin’s catherine hall. the order of friendship was awarded to figure skaters kamila valieva alexander gallyamov mark kondratyuk anastasia mishina victoria sinitsyna and skier alexei chervotkin were awarded the figure skater. nikita katsalapov and skier denis spetsov. i am very glad to see you and congratulate you on your wonderful performance at the 24th olympic winter games and present state awards. you certainly deserve them with your talent, hard work, skill, your devotion to the sport and its value to ideals. without any involvement, the brilliant victories of your yes and all our olympians, russian athletes have become a real decoration of the games. many. e, fans, not only in

our country, all over the world looked at it with admiration and rejoiced, and you again proved that you are among the very best athletes in the world. the olympic champion skier took part in the solemn ceremony. veronika stepanova today she was awarded the order of friendship labor i am the same age as the century. i was born in january 2001 before my very eyes russia has again become strong, proud and successful. not everyone in the world likes it. it is obvious. but we are on the right track and we will definitely win, as we won at the olympics. i am very proud that today i receive such a high award from our

country's president. thank you very much for raising the banner of the country high, and we will not lower it. also today, vladimir putin awarded the title of hero of russia, deputies of the state duma from chechnya, to adam delimkhanov, the corresponding decree was published on the official internet portal of legal information, the document states that delimkhanov was awarded the title of marriage and heroism shown during

a special military operation on the territory of the donetsk and lugansk people's republics and ukraine. download the application that's all you need. now all the news with video live broadcast of all tv channels and the largest collection of movie

programs in your hands on the application or on the website free without registration.

vladimir putin and turkish president erdogan spoke by phone , the kremlin's press service reported, discussed the situation in ukraine and russia's efforts to ensure the safety of citizens, including the organization of humanitarian corridors, the russian president informed his turkish counterpart about the progress of negotiations between moscow and kiev in connection with erdogan, who was affected by recep tayp with a question about the situation in mariupol , the president of russia noted that this city had been liberated and military operations were taking place. they are not conducted there, as for those blocked on the territory of the plant. azov became ukrainian soldiers and militants of nationalist battalions, then the kiev authorities should assume political responsibility and leadership out of humane considerations. give them the order to lay down their arms, prisoners of war are guaranteed life, medical care and treatment in accordance with international legal norms . vladimir putin and recep taip erdogan also agreed to continue coordinating the exit of turkish ships from the black sea ports along the russian-organized corridor gla. all turkey

we also discussed the development of bilateral relations,