these are uh slogans. these are very short and understandable definitions that attract them because they do not need to think much. here is what i got. here it is. i have it, moreover, i made some this symbol by inflicting a tattoo or making some for myself there, and uh, some word, by entering i automatically, including myself , in this group or in this structure. and the second thing that seems to me is, on the one hand, it’s purely external and on the other hand, what it seems to me is that they are educationally important and, perhaps this is the most important thing, that when a person enters this system and into this structure. he, perhaps, does not even understand that this is fascism, that this is nationalism; the most important thing arises for him, but the feeling of his own exclusivity. after all, the most important formula that was used in the third reich. that is , what is used today in ukraine ukraine according to natus and every person. he thinks i'm not a nazi. i'm not a nazi at all. he goes to this structure, and in his head he already has a cru. i'm better than others i'm higher than

others i can do it i can do it and it's no coincidence that in the third reich not everyone probably knows about it goebel created in the forty-fourth year. he was able to arrange it. the so-called specially gifted list the specially gifted list is a list. there are 390 with something names in this list included various people of the culture of art, uh writers, uh, who uh, whom the nazis chose, as they said especially, gifted whom, in the first place, could be attracted to themselves. and because they were of great value to society. they were the elite. here i return again to the elite. they were the elite. and this elite is not even anything i propagandize and not to mention the goals of nazism, the goals of fascism, but just uh, doing their work, and they were already working, in principle, for fascism, thereby actually personifying this in the form of such a kind

of cultural elite, i will name a few names, which, probably, about they are probably not known. they were on this list, but the most famous uh, the last name that was on this list. this is german koran. and we probably did not know this, but in 1933 he himself applied for membership in the nsdp and paid membership fees. after which he was given membership cards, for many years he was considered an honorary member of the msdp. and not just honorary members of the nsd, rfp. and let's say he was found at the congress of the nsdp in 1938, let me remind you. this is just the year of kristallnacht at the congress of the nsdp. he conducted and performed the anthem of the nsdpr, and in 1944, on april 20, at hitler's birthday party, he performed and prepared special holiday concerts. for him, this is a personality that to this day herbert foundation trojan germany well, this is an absolutely untouchable value. that is, this is the value of culture and no one at the same time recalls and does not say that this person was

a member. nsp deer refinstahl, which we all know very well, but a brilliant brilliant director, a brilliant woman, lived for 101 years, died only in 2003, that is, she survived everything and everything. i saw it. yes, she was hitler's favorite director, but she was also the favorite director of the millions who adored her and who watched her, from the olympic games to everything she created even after hitler was long gone and the war ended. by the way, there is one in these lists very famous figure. well, the truth is, not that one, but the surname is the defense of munchausen e. it was also such a figure. he wrote lyrical poems well known in those nazi times, known for anti-semy. these are famous writers, known to him, surname. these people created this external form of fascism, which was attractive to many. eh, now moving on to our lives. i'm asking a question. but is it in russia that the cultural elite who fled today is unclear

where who to ukraine who to israel, are they in for many years they have not personified for society among those people who are here they can afford everything they have everything they are on top of their mustaches. this is what elita is worth to her, which, of course, if they listen to me now, they will say that sosnovsky has gone crazy . what kind of nazis we are, what kind of fascists we are, most of us generally have jewish roots, while others we are there in favor of democracy. yes, you stand for democracy. but what you do how you do and what how for years you have been uh untouchable people this hmm list of the gifted is that it was in russia, this is a certain relationship to fascism - this is an internal embodiment of a certain internal embodiment of fascist content. for me it is very important and for me it is completely understandable. and here. i can't

return. it's a pity there is no quran, nazarov's step, because now they are touching something that cannot be touched, as it were, well, for many decades, starting from the soviet era for today . well what images of fascists and nazis we we see in our television, but the most favorite is the muller group, this is schellenberg, these are our favorite actors, of course, they played a wonderful video, but looking at these films. after all, we created and are creating in our brains a completely wrong understanding of who these people were. i, in uh, on social networks i meet almost every day they write this phrase of muller that if you somewhere sometime hear a zig-ha there or who knows, we go there yes , muller never said this people in people’s brains interfere with artistic work and type wonderful actor leonid bronevoy in the role of groups. müller's influx with who this nazi was just like schellingberg, and this and this

was created and is being created to this day. yes, of course , it is very good and pleasant to look at stirlitz, which is really for everyone, this is such a figure, but it is artistic. image and why in these artistic images in the same russian cinema and in soviet cinema? well, they didn’t at least create a work, like schindler’s list, i can’t say that the list is stronger than me stronger. go watch a wonderful movie absolutely wonderful broadcast. one of the strongest, which, by the way, in the west also knows very well there are other films, but i mean films. uh, where exactly the nazis are presented in the role of those who they were, animals, non-humans, those people for whom there was no price, they usually seem to us completely different from us, such films are here. i probably disagree, firstly, because hmm well, there was a great rum, with an ordinary fascism girl. just as it is shown. no. sorry we

yes, but we are talking about something. and excuse me, it’s not spring for me, it wasn’t filmed yesterday either. that is, we are talking about the soviet legacy, so it is impossible to pull out of the soviet legacy, only this film and its judges. yes, and we showed it like that, but i think the brilliant actors just showed everything difficult at the time. stalin said, yes, when our germans in the films looked like fools all the time. uh-huh, he said, but if they were such fools, why did so many people die, of course, yes, then seventeen is not that everyone fell in love with muller, of course, no one fell in love with the mullers, and for some. as you know, a common option, in general, was a russian soviet agent, and after the war of the safes, which the history of his figure is updated even more than he likes. it never happened to him. that is, but we do not underestimate the enemy, because you show

sympathy for nazism, nothing is caricatured. it's also wrong. and if i say, i want to be understood correctly, this is not about sympathizers of nazism, but it is about the fact that people, looking at television films at feature films reality interferes with what they can’t show when a person has a master about him in his brain, who plays a role. eh, groups, muller's influx in his subconscious is being worked out what i said about absolutely no, what looked good was applied to ban historical films. yes, i suggest the other way around. i suggest that you need to create films in which there would be more realities, and there, in my opinion, there were more than enough realities, where a lot of realities were there, just realities were people, which you did and studied the documents and understood well what they were talking about and you must not forget about the colossal charm of evil. after all , the cultural german peoples and professionalism, of

course, therefore the cultural german people so easily gave rise to absolute demons inside themselves, but they were with their own charm , therefore, to try it is always there, listen, but what do we, based on this goethe's faust, there is no ban, that's why we don't need to ban it. that is why i say about him that in modern conditions, the significance of the information message and the political effect uh, in the course of military operations, it has grown many times, at least, because the mil has become so permeable faster . the flow of information many times what was learned the next day, now they will know the next minute. and, proceeding from this, of course, when planning military operations, military operations have to proceed not only from military expediency, but from what kind of result. what impression will it

make? what kind of political psychological effect any other information will follow. you can achieve decisive victories victories, but how would today find out someone flies in the belgorod region or some shells or some kind of helicopters and legitimate questions arise. why is this not prevented. you can achieve victories by killing the flagship of the black sea fleet and asking questions. why did this happen? what is the effect of this and so on? i didn’t quite understand what dmitry meant when he said that it was necessary to demonstrate some other military-technical answer that would immediately enlighten the americans, for example, in regard to, i am for assertiveness for sure. i think if they're interested, uh. stability in our country is frankly making plans to destroy it, why don’t we ask, for example, those in poland who cherish the idea that lviv should be a

polish city, why don’t we, as it were, directly support this movement, uh, for the polish chairs to finally arise, if johnson and the uk are interested in ruining russia or delivering defeat. why not help your friends in ireland or scotland ? everything happened and should happen, i, uh, completely agree. i just want to say a word about the need to pay attention to other theatres, because in fact the impression is that we are approaching some threshold of possible compromises. in the south caucasus and unfortunately, the situation. it is such that the current government of armenia is actually trying to shift on us from that is, for everything that will happen in nagorno-karabakh, for the fate of the armenian population, that we must not agree, so to speak, they will agree and be good for azerbaijan for turkey for their opponents

and so on. just to get rid of this knife . or, let's say, i don't know if you are uh aware of this or not, but we were facing the prospect that on monday kyrgyzstan would have to sign a document by the united states, according to which the experiment would be a reality for those, uh, so-called er humanitarian envoys from the united states and the west who could freely operate there. in the third sector, this did not happen; instead, it was fired. filed in the resignation of the minister of foreign affairs of kyrgyzstan after the russian delegation flew there, but the problem is that everything has set in motion and we are being tested for strength along the entire perimeter. here on this. i think it's worth paying attention. yes, thank you, literally very briefly sergey you said that the idea is russia, is this undoubtedly so? what about those who ran away? and i want to say that this is a small part of the elite. they also have a very small

ideal, russia everyone will say to talk to them. yes, i'm for russia. how is that? here. i don't agree with by the fact that the question is different, they are already question the second question is, i will finish now the question is that the vast majority of our citizens are for a certain russia, for a strong russia, for russia , which is a country of opportunities and which do not trade their interests, does not trade their citizens. this russia needs to be created, to strengthen the economy, to develop the social sphere, we will continue advertising.

may i lighten the atmosphere a little? is she heavy? well, vasily is worried. let me put it to you, so that it is clear, most of all in that invaluable nonsense that you will see, the reaction of a certain gordon is important, just look to make it clear. with what same idiots. we have to deal. well, in principle, historically, if you look, uh, the coexistence of our two states turned out to be impossible, starting. as i understand it, probably, uh, this same uh-uh vladimir no one yaroslav the wise expelled ivan kalita for non-payment of taxes and ivan kalita to the backyard, as kievan rus founded

that moscow, then yuri dolgoruky built the first cream. everyone understands what was said. that is, in general, everyone understands the level of this brad. previously, it was a military export. they are present here, but dr. sosnovsky should be absent. the fact is that gordon nods happily, because colonel military expert is speaking, who mixed all the degrees of historical epochs, and it was quite difficult to drive out the person from whom you live in the interval of three years tom then found moscow about yuri dolgoruky, who lived before you ran away there before and founded moscow, but gordon does not know a single surname of a single historical fact. here is the price ukrainian political education is looking for that are sold in moscow gordon i stop by. i'm also

interested in why, and this one really thought the oak was a tree, it turns out, it turns out a mountain and from russia yes, no strong, that they haven't started for so long, that let's give you the opportunity. you know kozyr launched this idiot, on which i ca n’t i you heard the president of the russian federation today yes, you understood that the whole west can help you you can pull up part of africa as among these forty countries there are you can be satiated with any weapon. but today zhenya poddubny spoke, and he just spoke with sadness. how many of yours are dying is scary. he says, well, there are 60%, uh, they say, well, 30 million have gone longer. what a story here, the rammstein defense ministers themselves carried out. yes, there were forty people who gathered there, there is a defense of ukraine and they came from the soul with the fact that, well, now the second

this second stage of the military operation begins. here e. well, not like that, he, like other stickers from ukraine, says that here we are, well, here we are really win, then we did not win. we won tactically, and now we are preparing for a counterattack. here they are in time for us, they won, they won, well, tactically, and now victorious, well, we kicked you out from near kiev and chernigov and so we managed to do this, i want to remind you that after we had already left, we were afraid to enter for two days.

we watch it, just point the smartphone camera at the qr-code and download the application. that's all you need. now all the news with video live broadcast of all

tv channels and the largest collection of movies programs in your hands application or website for free without registration.

after the arrival of the leaders of the american ministry of foreign affairs and defense and these statements, somehow our entire ukrainian vertical says that we are preparing for a counteroffensive, and we must defeat us, of course, in these same statements, first of all, the united states of america johnson said you will lose. that's what happens , no matter how difficult it turns out that, as it were , our rhetoric is the right time for the war. we talk about what and we must win, what is it what is it true, but on the other side of real life and military events. and especially with regard to the economy of ukraine. they say that it

shows a completely different picture, in fact, completely, because if we say that we need 5 billion. then we say we need 7 billion. now we say, we need 9 billion. and then monthly in order to support us. yes, there are fewer and fewer people, and more and more money is needed, indeed, we are leaving. they don't get that money. yes perishes, he says perishes this tragedy, but 5 million left. it would seem that they do not pay. they say that they are supplying us with weapons. and the heavy equipment is coming soon. but when i see how russia is hitting like your armed forces, i remember on the program i once told about traction. then i looked again at the points, settlements where rockets reach. yes, kovel sdobunov is red. i mean, i'm just. well, i know where these are, uh, settlements, that is, for me these are not just words, and i understand how precisely you are doing this in your work.

the only thing i don’t understand is whether you have good satellites or someone is leaking all this information to you, that is, you really are so accurate. uh, hit the targets where they really are. uh, do you understand the train locomotive? and the third is not enough to see here rushing or foreign mercenaries at the aluminum plant, they helped and the third is how they fucked up, and everything and there is a terrible amount there diplomatically and hundreds of corpses diplomatic negotiations, about which we are talking to us yes, and our leaders say that including the head of the negotiating group of the army that yes, here are the negotiations. uh, almost daily or there several times a week, but there are no results of these negotiations and cannot be, even today's statement by mr. podlyak, who had information, but with turkey that

some kind of meeting format is possible. uh, zelensky and putin and then our side says that it was e said by a representative of the turkish ministry of foreign affairs. hmm and right there today, our , uh, speaker. uh, president's office mister, what does it have to do with us? well they do the part intermediary meanwhile they say that between clearly explained everything. here, you, well, meetings. this is what i’m coming to, that even this is an optimistic note that comes from turkey, uh, they say here, but we will not meet with putin because they are always begging for a meeting with putin , i just understand, i’m just right for you he said that tactics had changed. here in ukraine they say that there is no need for a meeting, because the meeting was not prepared and there was nothing to tell us from all sides

. this is what we tell you all the time wait. so we have now and our position has become exactly, how your will meet and will be negotiations. there is no idea about what to say documents are not ready positions. your position is written in london then. if our position, as you say, and many other speakers are written in london and in and in the united states of america that in part in particular in part of this with this. i agree, but then our position should be honest. if we want to fight you win the position is by definition no, no, no no, then our position must be honest, if we do not want to resolve the situation diplomatically. this means that we must prepare by military means for a real contrast, but then we must know. what do you want for the outline? you must count. and how many of our equipment do we have, and what are our capabilities. and how many of

our ukrainian soldiers do we really have? we are ready to fight with russia for 5 years a year 300 years, like some? only this should be an honest position, our intra-ukrainian. a. if we say, if we say that we are together with partners, but i i understand correctly that, well, almost under six, probably already, but millions who left, well, more than pe- yes, they have already answered, they are not going to fight. and i understand correctly, then, there are women , children, old people, they answered the women who live on 110,000 square kilometers of territory liberated from the nazis. tell me please, they are also not going to fight the zelensky perfection of the region and in the part of the zaporozhye region the authorities that now exist, i don’t understand what kind of power it is. that is, it is definitely not the government that submits to kiev is not the

russian government, this is the government, as they say in terms of the number of such and such and these people will not fight against the russian federation for sure, right? how to say. no, they won't hit your army. and so from this picture the simple situation turns out. we either talk honestly with ourselves and understand the situation as it is, or we start each other, we said honestly to our people, but your personal zelensky was not how many people died? ok then. you can not say how many died. maybe, for example, you i tell you missing person? here is such and such a number of people, here. eh, this figure was today. brought, moreover, 16,000 thousand people have been brought, officially today they are listed as missing literally lied for three. yes, he reduced it 2 weeks ago, this figure was almost 2.5 times less, you understand the missing person without the dead, well, only zelensky 3,000 more than 20 dead, yes, but if i

agree exactly by two, if we take the two figures that the president of ukraine said and uh, he'll be

president we have a leadership that claims us today that we have to fight, who in your country decides? well, we have, for example, the command is not the troops, who carries out? well, who and the head of the state believe this? i say, you are asking who should make the decision, who really makes the decision. eh, at the beginning? i said that mr. reznikov was on the decision. what he was making, so he came and said that they would not accept the program for us. who well, i answer you the question is not that you cannot understand in any way, today putin if he was waiting to understand the tragedy ukraine is that ukraine is a means. it is a tool for implementation. look, putin

says one thing, and the leaders of america and england say something else, and in ukraine there is a war every day. sorry hourly it was said the 24th in the morning. remove your troops from the territory of the donetsk and lugansk people's republics already. we can remove the troops if our partners are strategic partners, they say not to remove, here is the answer, who is in control of the situation, who gives you orders, so turn to your partners and ask them a question. and how many ukrainians should remain on the territory of ukraine, citizens of ukraine and they will answer you, ukrainians must fight to the last drop of blood. well, here's the question of a question related to the negotiations. he must talk about a certain subjectivity. yes, that is, i sincerely absolutely rationally think that ukraine today is not a subject. she is what avrov said yesterday. this is a proxy of the state, a proxy

of the state, because the power that was once elected, yes, that is, it was pure fraud, that is, they elected a person who there was simply no negative obygraunda. yes, that is, a good guy who criticized the government, that is, he was elected, but now this people has no influence on this government. that's perfect, so the power and the people. they are completely corroded and this power is completely controlled from abroad. that is, it is controlled by strange neat ones. this state is not financially wealthy, that is, for this state today the imf decides that an account is opened and, it seems, 5 billion will be delivered monthly. in order for this state to survive, that is, the imf never gives money for prosperity. the imf gives some money. but no, it means that now, of course, a loan, of course, a loan. here we are talking about only one statement that a special imf account is being opened to which approximately 5 billion dollars, five million euros will be supplied,

probably, yes, no, emf. no big deal, right?