you are already at other levels at the level of tactical nuclear weapons. uh, without danger, as it is believed to cause, e, a general nuclear catastrophe, although deterrence still remains the concept of nuclear deterrence was born in the sixties, the approaches of that time were worked on in the usa and in the ussr or something needs to be updated already. today, the proposition that a global nuclear war will end is still relevant. e of the existence of mankind, in no case can it be conducted, but on the other hand. eh, there was an idea that, and more in the united states, the theory of limited nuclear wars to some extent was circulated there as early as the cold war years. uh, on the russian side , it started with a period of weakness in the nineties. e russian conventional e armed forces. when , rather, weapons at a tactical, relatively speaking, at a

pre-strategic level e, began to be considered as an acceptable means to end the conflict, as he said, that is, if you lose the war with e, using only conventional weapons, then in order to avoid e uh, defeat and show your adversary your determination to use all the means of warfare available to you, including nuclear weapons. you e produce either a demonstration or a real e, nuclear explosion or the use of nuclear weapons in order to e, put an end to the conflict and move on to negotiations the most e, detailed is the strategy described in american eh documents in american e studies, but also in our military doctrine. eh, there is a provision. the fact that e russia, unlike the soviet union

who did not make such statements that e russia could use the first nuclear weapon. e in conditions where the development of hostilities can lead to a threat to the very existence of the russian state , the purity of the mention of nuclear war lately. is it a reflection of the high intensity of contradictions or is fear really growing, as it was during the cold war , real fear really appeared, but at the same time it was not real for a long period after the end of the cold war, probably the first 20 years. or about that, there was a fear, indeed, on the other hand, a rather large number of publications appeared, including military, uh specialists, which prove the expediency of using

nuclear weapons to solve military problems, that is, since it was in the fifties. uh, this in my opinion is a reflection. with the asymmetry that exists today between, uh, the united states of america on the one hand and russia on the other, if the ussr and the usa were equal parties in uh, the cold war, then the united states is suspending shipments today. here it may be, it just contributes to the fact that other long-term contracts will suffer, and to some extent, but in this strategy. and gazprom has a rational grain. yes? that is, gazprom now wants to show that if other countries, other companies do not agree to these conditions, then, accordingly, this will be followed by an immediate reaction in the form of a suspension of supplies. well, this is some

kind of bet. yeah that's what uh we're ready to go to stop deliveries in order to somehow influence the rest of the participants too. but it can lead to, uh, kind of a backlash and, accordingly, this whole system of contracts, when people start to refuse. and it supports this system, including the export of gazprom, and it will begin to slowly collapse. or maybe all this scheme will turn into something, well, completely archaic, for example, russia sells gas by barter to those who supply it with something else in return. eh, it's strategically important, after all. now there are already a huge number of sanctions that have been adopted at the level of the european union, which directly prohibits the supply of certain goods there. yes, including equipment or let's say equipment for lng that is, even if some european company or even a separate country, and it will not be able to supply it, because

there is a ban at the eu level, therefore, such barter schemes are quite difficult to implement, and within the european union well, i think the following is going to happen. and what is this disunity some different positions of european countries? and when will someone agree to the russian scheme? someone will not agree, but there is a single market within the eu, yes, therefore, in fact, those companies that agreed to these conditions, they may well increase purchases of russian gas and, accordingly, resell it, and to those companies that did not agree to these conditions. naturally, a lot of questions arise there, but about the infrastructure there. eh, it 's physical or virtual, right? that is, whether it will be necessary to transfer gas somewhere additionally, here, ah, so here it is to say in advance how difficult it will be. it’s complicated, but

nevertheless, similar things, they will happen, that is, part of these lost volumes will be compensated through, uh, other buyers, but on the whole at the level, it seems to me, well, gazprom has an understanding that it’s still european market. it will shrink in the long term. that is, it is history. maybe there is support this year next year, but the structural the european market will decline. and how long will it take the eu to completely abandon russian gas in three to five years? i think that it is. that's just about the horizon. there from five years to 5-10 years. i would say that this is, in fact, a cycle of investment construction of new lng plants. yes, if now european companies, but will conclude long-term contracts, and american companies, which, in

principle, have the resources, that is, and in the united states it is possible to increase gas production, they there is a resource base for this, but it is necessary to build new factories. and later, zhenya gas, respectively, in principle, they have, uh, there are quite a few companies that go with the projects of these plants, they are being considered. that is, all this must be approved by the u.s. energy regulator ferk. but nevertheless, there are a fairly large number of projects there in varying degrees of consideration. therefore, if they are provided with long-term demand by european countries and some kind of funding, let's say yes, including from european there are institutions there, what about building new freedoms there on the gulf coast? yes, there, but it takes 3 years there, plus there, well, 2 years, there is funding and so on. it is possible and it is. well, yes, enough can happen. yes, well,

it turns out in the future, the existing infrastructure is no longer needed. it's been building for decades and there has already been a destruction of value. yes, that is, nord stream, er, two, is essentially frozen, yes, and in the foreseeable future, well, not really, i understand. um, when can he start working? a and. well, even ukrainian infrastructure, here, which, in principle, is redundant. yes, that is, relative to even the current volumes that have been in recent years. well, that is, ukraine went through transit uh, within uh. yes, now it is actually 40, but the infrastructure. well, it is understandable, outdated, and so on, but nominally it is designed there for 150 of this one. well, such a certain degradation. it has already been implemented. well, over the past decades, and to some extent, this will probably happen with the infrastructure. belarusian yamalo

europe yes, because actually now, too, fucked europe is used, well, by 10%. 15% of its capacity, so first. naturally , if demand falls, gazprom will abandon the transit infrastructure. and the main channels will remain nord stream one because there is no transit. yes, this is actually the gazprom gas pipeline. but for e southern europe through turkey, the turkish stream is the blue stream and so on. the fact that they are traditions in the first place. thank you. it was marcel salikhov, and in another economic dimension of the crisis after advertising transport and logistics do not leave.

hello i'm already in the crimea, the weather is wonderful 30 °, no one is used to the most interesting place, when i tell them about what i feel, they listen, but do not hear. and that's bad. no one can rewrite our history. this is just one of the folders prepared by the soviet accusations for the international military tribunal in nuremberg. no one will close the borders for us. i will evaporate always together always online so strong. wow

, froze won't break, watch masterpieces of the world documentaries are now very lacking classics new items exclusives for free without registration. or on the website of the decision to entrust your film group with the shooting of material for this film, do not be afraid, the material will be the first oscar

dear friends, i invite you to our new release of the author's program besogon tv called this release will be is there a noble rage? i hope it will be interesting, i look forward to seeing you. in 1942 it exceeded death. in the camp prisoners were fed unpeeled buckwheat, we were dying. and grandmothers and children, people in search of food violated the ban

under the threat of shooting scars in their uniforms, fields, i have non-aryan blood on my thigh. our children were just vessels for them, very scary and very creepy to talk about, yes, fifteen hundred corpses were extracted in detail. moreover, their limbs were tied, in short, it was actually plump. it was with our countrymen. glory to ukraine jewish nationalists brought down the russian world throwing grenades the smoke was so through it it was impossible to breathe. why did society bring that apart

other people? despite the hostilities in ukraine, gas flows through the pipeline to europe through its territory in good order. paradox, but on that hybrid conflicts, but the transportation industry suffered considerably from the military-political crisis, more precisely, from its economic component, but it is inseparable from the rest of our regular author alexander popova talks about the problems that have arisen in poland. red points, these red points are our trucks, which are already in russia at the moment, but these

are still standing at the border crossing in estonia and waiting for entry for 5-6 days, well, the latvian border has already accumulated about 1,000 trucks. working in transport has never looked like a chore, but today, in terms of complexity, it is almost nuclear physics in just a few days, the world of polish carriers has turned upside down. we have problems after problems and time is critical time is money, but we can't predict anything is to blame. big politics immediately after the start of the special operation in ukraine, the polish borders with belarus were blocked by ukrainians and pro -ukrainian activists, which forced to suspend freight traffic from the east to europe began attacks on drivers hitting cars hitting cars hitting drivers. they seem to be gathering here such guys, inadequate let's say they are going to companies like that and yes, this is for one for two people. this is absolutely not human conflicts. mostly in parking lots.

here among, well , paralysis between the drivers of russia and belarus and ukrainians, the supply did not make warsaw wait long for a response from belarus quickly imposed sanctions against polish carriers. we are transporters. all important. we transport workers from the very beginning were critical of the protests, the polish government should not allow the protests of ukrainians on polish land, this is not their home. we do not transport military cargo. we carry products that normal people need, that is, food or medicine is managed by the artek transport company, which has been operating in the transport services market for 30 years. during this time, it was possible to establish permanent cooperation in the eastern direction. mainly with russia to this day day in the office there is a poster with trucks of the company against the background of st. basil's cathedral; now, in order to get to russia, you need to. work hard previously, just passing through belarus today, polish trucks can enter the country no more than

50 km. and only when they bring the essentials. if they want to go further east, they have to reload the goods to other trucks in belarus; now just planning the logistics is not enough, you need to clearly predict. how much gasoline to fill in the car? because when its too much the car at the border is overloaded when the driver who is waiting in line has little. sometimes for several days, there can also be trouble for the driver from time to time. it is necessary to start the car to warm up or vice versa to leave perishable goods, and this increases wear. in addition, prices are rising in order for transportation to be profitable and the transport company must charge more money for the delivery of cargo of each film any company that wants to survive is forced to raise prices even by a few dozen percent, because otherwise the business simply will not pay off, if we do not, we will go bankrupt losses. sky-high because, in addition to breaking long-term contracts, people made massive prepayments for goods and now they cannot

bring it. in addition, the blocking of accounts means that even if the goods were delivered and the money for ice cream was sold, they could not be withdrawn by all industries that were traded in belarus and russia paralyzed earlier transportgroups, if mobile transport, an integral part of any economy, if it is an industry to stop its existence will immediately raise questions. will we have bread in bakeries or will transport companies be able to work in the hospital ? how russia will cope with the urgent efforts to block trade relations with it by land and sea problems of the military-political crisis for transportation our main problems are the refusal of

regular operation by the largest container lines, they continue to operate, but in smaller volumes. uh, the two largest lines of mayer's cmsg have practically curtailed their activities, they only take out containers. a little bit of export makes the italian swiss neterem shipencampani continue to work also in smaller volumes with non- sensational cargoes and try not to change certain european ports, so as not to substitute containers. this is what closed st. petersburg, our main export-import hub, through which, in fact , all the work for the western part of the russian federation went. this is the first moment the second moment is blocked, in fact the western borders of the russian federation land transport is under great stress even for non-sanctioned cargo. uh, it essentially cut off in total with st. petersburg. we have somewhere in the order, uh 12 and 13

million tons of annual trade, all this is expensive useful payloads from folk goods consumption to various components for all types of production. here are spare parts for fine chemistry, uh, microelectronics, and so on and so forth. that is, a significant number of industries today are busy looking for new suppliers and new supply channels for e, in fact, in order to continue production in order to save jobs, our similar and export suppliers are in the same situation, both with paper and with chemistry also by helicopters, 24, in addition, three missiles were shot down. shelled residential quarters. during the day, high-precision air-based missiles hit 38 military targets of ukraine of the operational-tactical army aviation of the russian aerospace forces, 22 military targets of ukraine were hit, including five platoon strongholds of 13 areas for reducing the manpower of military equipment, as well as

four warehouses, rocket artillery weapons and fuel settlements, severodonetsk chervonoe and belogorye, missile troops hit three military facilities of ukraine during the day, destroyed in the adamovka area launcher zenith of the boom-1 missile system, as well as the mi-24 helicopter of the ukrainian air force on the site. in the chuev area, artillery units hit five command posts, 13 strongholds of 64 areas of concentration of manpower of military equipment, as well as seven artillery positions, as a result of strikes over 200 nationalists and 32 units in the equipment area were destroyed and vehicles for various purposes were shot down in the air during the day three ukrainian missiles shells a salvo day system a tornado in the area of ​​​​the settlement of tobolsk in ukraine , another british mercenary was liquidated, despite the fact that london is officially against the participation of her majesty's subjects in hostilities. some politicians are trying to introduce him to almost

heroes about how much it costs to maintain soldiers of fortune efficiency, which is not high varvara nevskaya only yesterday his name was known only to a limited circle of relatives , friends and colleagues. today, great britain is sculpting from a mercenary liquidated in ukraine scott sibley is almost a national hero when people choose to fight heroically for important causes. they are truly risking their lives. and this is quite. not only will we inevitably see many more such actions, but the heroism of a 36-year-old british citizen who served in the royal logistic corps in the past is unknown, nothing like how he ended up in ukraine, how long he stayed there and under what circumstances he died , which, however, did not prevent the largest british media to put his photo with tragic headlines right on the front page, stingy line in the daily

starley express and times extended article about sending eight thousand troops of the crown to eastern europe to contain russia in connection with the death of the scooter in the daily telegraph , the farane office telegraph declined to comment dryly the death of a sibley bad luck soldier and the loss of another unnamed briton. we can confirm that a british citizen was killed in ukraine and we support their families we are aware of the citizen united kingdom, who went missing in ukraine, we urgently request additional information , and the us government is collecting additional information about the villa of josephine, according to snen , a 22-year-old mercenary liquidated in ukraine, according to the stories of chancellor willy's mother, was killed on monday in search of what then seemed easy money in an independent man arrived through poland on march 12 as part of an american pmc in response to the news of the death, the us state department

once again asked the americans to refrain from visits to ukraine in connection with the danger of being hunted down and liquidated by russian special services. we reiterate that us citizens should not travel to ukraine due to active armed conflict and the isolation of us citizens in ukraine by russian government security personnel us citizens in ukraine should leave immediately if it is safe to do so using any commercial or other private ground transportation options. transport, however, the statement of the state department. habitually at odds with reality given artillery in combat operations. on the side of ukraine, about 300 american mercenaries from four private military companies are participating, officially operating in the united states for one day and loyalty to the kiev regime costs 180,000 dollars, while in total. the us and ukraine have already spent more than 11 million dollars on their maintenance varvara nevskaya vesti. vladimir putin

held an operational meeting with the permanent members of the security council to discuss the situation in the donbass, issues of the country's security, including in the southern direction, taking into account the situation in afghanistan dear colleagues, from the point of view of ensuring the security of the country, the focus of our attention is, of course, on the events related to helping our people in the donbass with a special military operation in ukraine, but we also have others. e questions that are of great interest. uh, from the point of view of just ensuring the security of our country, including in the southern direction, therefore today. hey, let's talk today. e of this question in relation to events. e in afghanistan and in general, in this region on this direction. let's get down to work sergey lavrov's speaker the ninth number of lavrov the west will not wait until russia capitulates to the sanctions, and

the special operations in ukraine will be completed when all its goals are achieved about this interview to alirabia tv channel sergey lavrov also stressed that the negotiations are slowing down on the orders of the west ybin if they were honest and conscientious negotiators, we could make significant progress in the negotiation process ukraine would receive security guarantees for a group of countries we stuck because of their inconsistency, because of their desire to play games every time and, as far as i can guess, because of the instructions they receive from washington, london and other capitals not to force the negotiation process the united states decided to fight disinformation at the state level. a special council appeared there, headed by a former expert on russia and belarus, the appearance of a new supervisory body coincided with the transfer of twitter into the hands of elon musk, who promised to return freedom of speech to the site,

lyudmila skiing will tell how the united states reacts to the innovation. george orwell and the ministry of truth make headlines in the american press with similar combinations. free speech seems to be forever a thing of history, say some publications of the uii . such threats not only enhance security from external threats, but also achieve security on our territory, in fact, washington in violation of the us constitution, introduces they tried to calm the censorship of the americans by saying that the new council would pay special attention to russia and illegal migration, but to the question of journalists. why then the department was not created at the state department or other agencies that counter foreign threats remained unanswered, the republicans openly stated after losing control of twitter. the white house needs a new information club biden's policy has disappointed americans so much that his approval rating is at an all-time low against biden's

re-election as president. already speaking 63% of citizens disinformation from the point of view of the white house is facts that are inconvenient for joe biden and the democratic party. they stigmatize anything that doesn't fit in with their preconceived stance as disinformation, to be honest, it was like a belated april fool's joke, but they actually created such advice, in fact. this is the ministry of truth they do. this is to be able to spread outright lies against which people will not be able to speak out and fight back. republicans have already pledged to initiate a bill that should deprive the new funding council caused a lot of irritation in the us and the head of the new council was appointed to this position by nina jankovic earlier. she oversaw the russian and belarusian programs at the us national democratic institute, among other things , helped to prepare a coup d'état in minsk, and she also helped biden take the laptop scandal and his son hunter's edition of the new york post and even called

the decision to appoint. her onkovic idiotic. it's complete madness that the women who run the council are not on jankovic veteran distributor disinformation, she accepted and promoted the fake trump and russia dossier created by the clinton company and she waged war on our publication's true and accurate reports about hunter biden laptops. many users of social networks write that biden himself has long been reminiscent of an incapacitated person and also selects rather strange personnel in his administration, they reacted to the song that yankovic posted on the network and wrote that she was mary poppins of disinformation. discussion of the ministry of truth has become a trend twitter, with which yankovic seems to be actively going to fight. she has already stated that they are afraid of the promises that elon musk, who bought the social network, to make twitter a bastion of absolute freedom of speech

washington seems to have decided to finally crack down on freedom on the network at the initiative of the united states 60 countries, including almost all of europe and ukraine, signed a declaration on the future of the internet and again users indicate that the document resembles the book of the eagle, declares freedom of expression and respect for human rights. however, immediately done an emphasis on the removal of objectionable information, which many regard as the introduction of worldwide censorship. when people who have opinions other than democracy are simply silenced. how it was successfully done in the united states during the last presidential campaign personnel 100 pieces of equipment