well, you won't let me lie. i talked about it all the time. no need to try to change you break. you know, as people say, you don’t have to be a cowboy with a vegetable base, you don’t have to pretend to be, so to speak, a european gentleman. no need to pretend to be, so to speak, chinese or japanese or anything hello means that you don’t need to study, but you need to remain yourself to understand. here are my strengths. they are such and such and such and such they must be used, they tell each other that all this is not working now. this now it’s not like that now it’s not like that, and so i want to support everything that was said here in economics, including, in my opinion, unfortunately, again, i’m not an economist, i can be wrong. i have the impression that the struggle continues in our economic approach. of these two beginnings, this is one beginning, that which, well, it simply screams. listen, the situation has changed, the task of others is to act, first, faster and more decisively somewhere along the paradox, where it may be, in general, across all the rules, where it is really events about everyone. these here, so to speak, are like curtseys, and the other one is still like that. well, yes, we were wrong, but we are still right.

we are still right, because we continue to have a diploma, so to speak, we have such and such a diploma, we were there, we were filmed, we read many books, and this approach is ideological and, first of all, it concerns. it seems to me, after all, our financial power, which i have no answer. here they stole our funds. there it is correct in the case they say to pay, such as debts, and we pay. i just don't really understand it. they say that russia is now for the first time, there may be a default. i tell him, send you some mother. you have stolen our money. you took everything away from us and say, but before your christ, tell the west that we are declaring a default on you. you bastards , robbers, bastards, scoundrels get out and do n't owe anything to anyone. i think this is a problem, but in my opinion. this is a problem, just about what they are talking about, it is ideological, there is a part of people in whom it has climbed so deeply into the soul. this secondary and mind and brain. and also, by the way, this is secondary, oddly enough. the idea of ​​their exclusivity is supported, they

have been talking for many years that they know how to do it, that they are the best at understanding. and suddenly such a bummer. this is an internal conflict between the fact that it actually turned out that your opinion about your exclusivity is not supported by anything, but on the other hand. here is some such you know through yourself such an ambition. no, we will prove that this is how it interferes. find the best solution. this does not mean that it is really so to say, it is necessary to forget everything that was, but this is an attempt, you know, but still affirm, no, we are ideologically right. i mean all those who built liberal financial policies. all these things. no, we 'll get back to that. and behind this, what is behind these. here it is now more lost earlier, as it was good. we are the smartest, we all know how to do it. you do not advise us. we'll manage without you . yes, and i want to go back there, but this is absolutely flawed, so to speak, a position that one must understand that it will be impossible to return there. well, it won’t work in one water in these two times , new quick paradoxical solutions are needed. them

of that experience, but absolutely idealized, yes, and dilogized astrological from tasks. there is a task. how is it right here? he said that it is necessary to produce such and such a thing. so what can be done if we discard all the laws there, it means to read traditions and other things, what needs to be done so that this is this this is this and this is what needs to be done, and not just what to say about this it is considered princess maria alekseevna or wrote there some i will give smith or i don’t know who doesn’t care, who doesn’t matter. yes, it’s no less than some alison herself there with her economy there, or some other moron there, so to speak, yes, not completed. well, or rather, maybe they were good for their time, so to speak, but time is changing in this sense, i don’t think either, i think that there is an unlimited time limit, because these are the consequences of the sanction. they will still overtake us, now we need these questions decide. and, by the way, the second topic, which i want in particular. here's a hold, so to speak, khacha about those territories where we already controlled. i believe that the territory should become larger, but where we already control, no doubt. we just need

to try to implement these new approaches. so they wanted to do with the crimea did not work. so they wanted to do the dpr lpr. did not work out. i remember it well. i remember that at that time it was a lot of conversations of consultations, a lot of papers were written, but let's do it here, like we have never done before did. and maybe it will even be. and for example, we are a model testing ground for running in some new techniques, which later didn’t work out here, why, but all the same, see point one, because if it worked out, it would turn out that we need to do it differently here but don't want to do otherwise. we are already sitting well, we are the smartest, so to speak, we manage everything. we have it all sorted out. where are you going with your projects? no need. i know this story very well both in crimea and partly in the dpr of the lpr. no need. although it is more difficult there, because there was a war going on. naturally. we don’t need to show here that you are smarter than we were talking about, you look, you will succeed there. and we'll have to do the same here. no, that will not do. so now. at least

you need to step over it a little now, step over it and show, among other things, to the residents of ukraine that it is possible in a different way and let it become here for someone, it can be some kind of unpleasant surprise or threat, but then really personnel policy needs to be changed personnel policy. it is necessary to change it well, so to speak, you even know, we have it there, they say that there to shoot it and hang it there. yes, no need, even give them an order, so to speak, three orders. let them say so. there is no main. take it away, the main thing is, let him be a man, so to speak, you still don’t understand, damn it, writes memars. i don’t know, but let him , so to speak, take it and create his own school there, i don’t know, for especially advanced, especially gifted, and so on and so forth for a lot of money. let him live in peace. well let he doesn't interfere. let him not climb, so to speak, into the ideology of decision-making. this is extremely important, and try to know this here. we know a little bit, so that's half a shot. i beg your pardon, so to speak, but it won’t work out as rude, because it’s too dangerous a time, a dangerous time someday, maybe it was possible 10 years ago to afford this now, no, now it’s impossible. i think this is an extremely important question. moving on, by

the way, to ukraine yes, i also raised this topic here, so to speak, too. and why no matter how happy we are in general with everything that happens, although it seems to even say so, is it so, otherwise quickly and quickly, but, nevertheless, the russian army, so to speak, achieves success. and by the way, the loss ratio is, of course, there, uh, it's going up. here are all the last all the last months all the last weeks e is not in favor of the ukrainians. well , there for them, for many. there, just to be attacked, they do not want to report these things. there, in some places , positions are simply overwhelmed, what is called paths , and so about the corpses. yes, and about that's why we don't have happy faces, so to speak. here is about it. here on my last trip. i saw, uh, those corpses of ukrainian soldiers. rejoice in this. maybe only a sick person will rejoice at this. maybe the only way to say this to a person who has nothing at all in his soul. moreover, these are our people who spoke our own language. it is they who can rejoice in such things, this is the tragedy of ukraine in that there

are people in power who can rejoice in this and, by the way, so to speak, uh. this is western school is correct. you showed kirby here, so to speak, who didn't give a damn about the afghan kids there. remember, so to speak, too, hillary clinton, who looked at sadism and laughed. yes, yes , they tormented me when i said many times here, what is it really? indeed, ukraine has become europe in terms of moral and ethical degradation. it is today the vanguard of europe a cult, a cult of violence, a cult of death a cult. eh, and i don’t know any , so to speak, completely wild perversions and joys about this savoring the transformation this in the show forgiveness of this, so to speak in pleasure. today, in fact, the main path of development of western subcultures and ukraine is the place where this is where this is where these things are realized. and i personally think that let them be there, whatever. let's again, with regard to there across all the rules. and this is by and large. our earth is not ours from the point of view of great power, but from the point of view of historical

destiny. these are our people, some of them, as it were, deceived one of them. uh, i didn’t understand something in time, they just forcibly drove someone, therefore, speaking of goals. yes, i know, everything is fine, what president putin says about the fact that we will not stop anything, maybe we don’t need to occupy and so on, but i personally think that our goal is at least the reunification of you exactly the slavic orthodox ethnic group of the russian belarusian and of the ukrainian people, how it will legally look like you can as much as you like, so to speak, but de facto it should be, and this, by the way, will not be a game. it will be a serious draw. victory will be a serious success on really. they are afraid of it. they have been afraid of this for centuries, and therefore they are now tearing their hooves like this, not only because they, so to speak, there is something they want to somehow weaken us. and yes, indeed, they are in the future, in principle, in the ultimate goal. would have seen the destruction of russia without any doubt. well, this process is very important for them. in addition to, so to speak, purely geopolitical economic things, they have

paid attention to this for centuries, there were no badgers yet. there was no america, but they are very we seriously thought about this, this territory is there, well, conditionally there or meter long, as you wish, so to speak, yes, borderline. for some reason, it always bothered them very much, because this is a watershed between one understanding of the world and another understanding of the world, and they understand, so to speak, actually metaphysical, if you want, importance, that's the only thing in this territory, again directly, how to call it there on this very thing is another question, but i think this is what we should strive for. as for belarus, i think that and this is a historical task. this is the historical task of survival, on the one hand, and on the other hand, the historical task of growing above oneself, because in fact, belarus yes, so to speak, like here it is, i think that in some kind of association this is the prospect of upward growth. and some transformation, as it were, yes. here in these little little sliced ​​\u200b\u200beurope, sliced ​​into small, small houses, so to speak, into small, so to speak, such nooks and crannies, somewhere in this nook you sit and no one don't touch. in fact, they fear russia as a

historical destiny. this challenge here is an alternative that historically they have not experienced for many centuries. this is what scares them, maybe even many of them do not understand this, therefore, yes, their goals are limiting, beyond any doubt, their goals are limiting. yes limit destroy destroy. if it is impossible to subdue, then destroy, nevertheless, one must understand that the task should be set on a larger scale. i agree, for example, let's say maybe president putin can't talk about it. talk or you know. did you know that president putin said president putin may have his own opinion on this matter i have my own and let, by the way, by the way, many people know that in our country many thoughts in this sense are much more radical it seems that president putin is very hard you are mistaken, dear gentlemen. officers, peers, and others, and so on, and gentlemen, you are mistaken, it seems to someone, probably, that they may be lying to themselves that there is such a big one russian people. he is dreaming, so to speak, of how to live there in a liberal democracy. and one

putin forces here this most. eh, i ’m flying this military operation. you are wrong. that's literally me drip so to speak. i talk to people on the street. just recently, he says, one grandfather is coming up. he says that you are saying that you are playing lightning. it is necessary to say that it was to destroy when they now came to the president to zelensky, yes, and that’s all, yes, and everything together with this zelensky and there would be no ukrainian of the state and there would be no one to help them, too, there to the heap, so that they do not plow, that's actually how the mass of the conditional russian peasant thinks. so, but not at all, but not at all. no, well, it's true, but somehow all of these agree somehow. i just remembered right away, this is a famous film where ilyich reads. uh, they come to him and read the letter. what do you offer? what to do with fists, and you write, uh, it's already too late to shoot, but also an excellent idea to shoot like that. i'm kind of in my eighteenth year. i am like

jokes, really. i still went up to three credits written by a political scientist. yes, i understand the arguments that do not allow us to do this. i understand the reasons, i understand, but those who think that in fact, as if there is some kind of mumu about this . yes, you are mistaken, because in fact . the codes, relatively speaking, of a mass russian citizen there, they are much tougher, radical, the most traditional question that my peers and younger ask me. they say you guys can tell me the defense's heart national guard. make bases for us, where we could retrain, so that the hands will remember. because we understand that if necessary, we will not give up our homeland to anyone, regardless of age. we'll go and break. it's just that there is an understanding that the people have such a feeling, and why did you say, very deep, just very deep, than the right thought. and why do they

hate putin so much, but because putin is the first and only of the leaders of russia and, probably, the last of all the soviet unions there, who just understands the challenge as existential and does not play these intellectual intellectual snot. like, well, well, there will be no russia, but that's okay, but humanity will live, and he somehow expressed the ultimate wording. why such a world in which there is no russia and here, therefore , all this squealing begins. yeltsin's still all sorts of packs belotserkovsky begins to scream. are you, how can you is that the threat of nuclear war? the west starts screaming. what are you, how can you, that is, some kind of approach, but let russia die completely by its own population, but the world is not to be touched. and we say, not guys, well, russia there will be no peace if there is no putin, that's why they are so

afraid, because they understand that putin will not go, there will be no compromises. well, yes, it's god, but i'm just literally a couple of times, because to what was said. this is the first in 30 years. in fact, an attempt to throw a challenge to geopolitical dominance and absolutely boundless rudeness by the west, which has established on this planet that here a on planet earth therefore, everyone is so quiet, but therefore, including everyone, is watching how this thing is going, therefore, unfortunately, i also do not agree that there is an unlimited time limit. a very close person, you have been together since childhood. you look after her. take on the operator

digs will come. are you sure what you're doing? everything is correct. clutch leadership of the country humble yourself. you have already filmed from the company, the cable, no one gave such material your report is unique from the creators of the film battle for sevastopol thanks to military operators. we can see the truth with our own eyes. the first oscar

dear friends, i invite you to our new release of the author's program besogon tv called this release will be is there a noble rage? i hope it will be interesting, i look forward to seeing you.

odessa on april 10, 44, she was liberated from the nazis, but on may 2, 14.

it seems to me that they are all watching, and therefore it is important not to rush anywhere, but it is important to understand that the time factor exists, but in any case, time works for us to rush. we cannot imagine let in any case, that is, but you can't be an endless indisputable process. yes, but here you need to find that norm, when the skating rink fulfills its psychological task, because it’s just a very important result here, and they will be, but still you need to understand, not at any cost. not

at any cost, not at any cost, but not at the same time, again , in some places it is always necessary, according to a paradox, somewhere something must be taken, so to speak. and somewhere you can get by with something, because you have to understand that all of them are weapons to help. yes, the last sentence. just for me it is important because i will return to what i started. uh, but nevertheless, nevertheless, of course, if we talk about the metaphysical goal , it is important that people do not die, even our opponents, even our enemies, as well. haven't matured. i think, if you want water, - he says, and what is the goal, so that they see the light, putin explains 100 times in this sense in this sense, for me, as for a believer, the restoration of holy russia is a fact of this insight, because that from the other side i see only devils, whom this holy russia does not allow to live. she them across. like this, like a bone across the throat that has become. i think that it is extremely important to understand this, so almost every speaker today, when speaking, paid attention to such characteristic very rudeness. and the feeling that the

americans can dictate and, in general, western countries can dictate to another state. what is the right way to behave? here is an example with india - this is just a vivid example, because india is a very large state, but, in principle, for every day you can collect 15-20 such quotes, when western countries consider it possible to point here the political system to justice from the economy to human rights. well, behind this to me consist so deep historical cultural hmm and the roots that counting on the fact that this will ever change is completely pointless, in general, the word civilization itself. here sergei viktorovich lavrov used it in his speech. we always, uh, now pay a lot of attention to the civilizational approach. it also has the origin of ancient roman civilization in ancient rome. meant a slightly different phenomenon, if we compare it with how we understand it here, and in what context we use then civilization understood, if we

literally translate this word this is a reduction to a proper citizen, that is, civil this is the correct behavior or the correct norms the correct traditions. there is something barbaric that surrounds. here is a civilian civilian is exclusively the romans and here is what surrounds them. that's all barbarians who live wrong and it is necessary to educate them and make them citizens. and that means making yourself out of them under your own spread the culture to them. we are today. we understand civilizations a little differently, we mean different civilizations, which are held together by spiritual, primarily religious, cultural traditions. after e ancient rome, if you look at the middle ages, we will see that this civilization has come to the point that we have the same religious affiliation, different confessions. and this denomination came to a dogma, for example, it is not the fallibility of the pope of rome; in russian, the term without fallibility is more often used, because it assumes that the pope rimsky simply cannot be mistaken, he is always

right, when in particular he appears there with various appeals, then in the era of modernity. they generally came to such an ideology, which was supposed to be the teaching that is contained in the west. the philosophy that arose in the west, it cannot have any alternatives, because everything that contradicts. this ideology is contrary, just almost a natural phenomenon, because human rights. which became a consequence of the development of this society acquired a natural status. what? of course there is none a person with these rights does not have. just by the fact of your birth. for this, the state legislation is needed, a society that shares these values, otherwise those are the rights that a person has by birth. well west uh, insist that there are inalienable natural human rights that are here just by the fact of birth. well , you can go to africa south of the sugar some touching. only it is completely broken by children. mowgli the so-called phenomena, the child

turned out to be, let's say, a wild forest and grew up in a flock with him this function is speech and it got there, therefore something is somehow not realized, therefore it is strange to talk about it as a natural right, because it can only be realized in the presence of society. with that certain level of development, it is absolutely accurate, and despite the fact that this is any sane person. you understand that this is nonsense, but the whole thing is based on this nonsense. the doctrine and the whole political philosophy of western civilization that says that if you do not accept this, then you are either authoritarian at best, totalitarian at worst. state. you have no right to exist, you have an anti-human regime, you must destroy it. and this is the brightest democratic. well , yes, because how can an elitist autocratic state be destroyed, only in an absolutely democratic way and uh, this is the thesis that there are some things that are allowed for us

, what is allowed for jupiter is not allowed for a bull, this is quite acceptable in the world, in which er, there is a correct system. we have the wrong system. she got you to understand what it is is based not only on some discussions and performances. today we have a constitution , for example, which initially, in principle, for the most part was compiled on the basis of those political and social institutions that developed in western countries, but never. developed in russia, most of the world has such constitutions , these political institutions in the west have under them, social institutions that do not exist in countries of another civilization, social institutions should always be based in our constitution the only thing that really makes sense is the amendments. yes, here are the first movement amendments. well , seriously, i'm talking about amendments - this is the first such first movement in the direction close to the values ​​that actually unite our society, and these social institutions are without value.

they just don’t work, and this is what caused us. this is a shake-up in the world that exists today, because this universalism and this dictatorship of one type of one model of the value of institutions and other things, and is typical not only for internal devices. they are trying to do this in international relations. they impose their principles and state institutions on the international level absolutely and here you need to understand. so we are in such a conflict, in which we already have the leadership of the country directly, he says he does not hide it. it says we are trying to free the world from this western yoke from this dictatorship. dictatorship on a global scale is impossible due to the immutable powerful, ideological and theoretical base that they possess and, uh, they put it into practice through a very well-built propaganda. but one must be aware that this propaganda is also mistaken. and we see that they are trying to convey to the territory of

russia the ideas that they are trying to convey here . they are now beginning to refract in a slightly different direction. if initially, at the time of the start of the special operation, the main bet was made on the fact that the population would be frightened and show that the majority was opposed, allegedly against the special operation, thereby causing dissatisfaction with the government, which did not work out in the result of all the steps that have been taken. western countries from economic measures to the information war of the atmosphere of fear that they tried to create, we got such a result that the support of the president increased by 20%, and supporters. uh, normal relations with european countries have become two or three times less according to the results of the latest survey. after all, before that it was 51%. now, if they are mistaken, there are already less than 20% of people left who believe that a normal dialogue with them is generally needed. this is a number significantly less than half already remains. this is the

result of the first stage of this information war, but now the main focus is on trying to convince the population that, uh, in our country, that the special operation is going badly, that everything is bad. you're not doing well. so, uh, you have swung at such steps, and you are not succeeding. this is exactly the same spoon as the first stage of this information war, but it is already a pancake, they already understand a little more here. the psychology of our population, because our the population is such that it is impossible to frighten it with confrontation . it is absolutely impossible for humanity. it, on the contrary, perceives how it is necessary to invigorate the challenge. yes, this is an interesting task. now we can unite, consolidate and show the whole world what we are capable of. and here, the second is already tuned to the psychology of the mentality of our people, who can perceive any kind of power, but not weak, who can perceive. any kind of leadership, but only not losing, and therefore it is very important that the population clearly

it was understood that everything was going absolutely fine , the task was being carried out on time and exactly the tasks that were originally set by the country's leadership were being carried out. what tasks are we talking about and i will end here. i'm following the discourse very carefully right now, which is unfolding backwards. and what they say is just a special operation in ukraine in general, sensible people, they honestly admit. they say script. here. yes, they tell five six seven, someone eight scenarios, but all in one the voice says the scenarios in which russia loses military in this conflict does not exist, it simply does not exist, because as soon as it could hypothetically happen russia could use nuclear weapons. and on this. uh, the special operation will be completed, so this scenario is not even considered. they understand that there is no possibility for ukraine to win the war against russia , even hypothetically, if they understand this and they continue.