we took so much money, we are so ashamed, the title of the people means nothing to me all this money, which well, really, well, what is it for? maybe already we need to wake up and understand that in a tough dialogized world. we'll just be torn apart. dim , you have written a lot of work on this topic and one brilliant book with authors. thanks, yes? uh, thank you, uh, a book, really important to us. i am grateful to you and feed george. i who wrote reviews about it. it is called the ideology of russian statehood timothy sergeians. dmitry kulikov pyotr mostovoy, but we considered, really tried to consider what ideology is, in general, how to talk about it? how to think about it and what is our ideology. well, from the very moment of our manifestation of the russian people from the moment of baptism. up to the present day, how far it has been possible to judge

the readers. well, you know, in that, uh, in the formulation of the question that you have just asked, here is something else that is important. here, look at us and we do not fully realize this until now, the most advanced experience of life in beyond the ideological state that was the soviet union and it advanced attention. now i am not going to defend or denigrate anything in this story, because we need to extract knowledge from there , and knowledge has nothing to do with evaluation , and we, like no one else, understand the possibilities beyond ideologization and its limitations. well, yes, of course. we remember georgievich also likes to talk about it. the main film producer of the country was eighty salty. right down to the scripts, and the film

alexander nevsky is an overly ideological product, who has invested a lot in us. so many of us still believe that this is actually a mental film. well, yes, that it was alexander nevsky who directly said this, and stalin wrote it there with these lines. here, and stalin's phrase of other writers. i don’t have it for you, because in this sense he understood, yes, that there are some who can write, by the way, he was a very devoted reader. bulgakov's truth to bulgakov. it didn't really help these nuances are all important. here is what i am discussing now. and it really allowed us achieve very high successes, including the defeat of german nazism. you understand what is the point of ideology, this knowledge is always outdated. and we treated this in the same way as

our opponent now treats it, as faith as in the fact that the truth is forever and forever and unchanging. well, we are faced with this history. yes, immediately in the fifties and sixties, and suddenly it turned out that no one at the institute of philosophy in all departments and departments could write. it was stalin who found out not the political economy of socialism, which she it took him before stalin was stabbed to death. he realized that no one could write this. not the critique of marxism that was needed. it needed to be updated so to speak. and no one can do this, because at the moment when society is closed by dogmas and any criticism is prohibited. it 's just, by the way, what have they now completely come to? that, of course, leads to the death of a number of functions, which well are the most important functions of development. yes, we always say the soviet union entered its own crisis

then, when i could not give birth to an update of the project, this is true. and why he could not, because the dogmatic over ideologization. there are pluses. it has its own pronounced disadvantages. this we know. and by the way, you see, it seems to me that when we say that we don’t have it, and so on, there is a more powerful thing behind this than the unwillingness of some officials or some dark forces, although the prohibitions of the west are so to say on the development of an ideological product, it was precisely so to speak. yes, well, that's because we don't know until the end of the answer. we understand that we need an ideology. well, how to make it not dogmatic, like, because we have already lived through everything, we have this answer to the end. no, they don't even think about it. they still have a long way to go. with what they arrange for themselves in this sense, they really do, and

therefore the parameter includes e in the late e late soviet union, by the way, i think that knowledge, and the new world will be exactly how knowledge is born now is worse than this gigantic confrontation. who what? well, who are we, because when i i look at our runaway elite from akunin to bykov, oksimiron grebenshchikov there, any surnames there, people don’t like insim very much, and they all think that the people are extremely bad, the people are terrible. he is for putin, so the question. and who are we, well, i'm definitely not talking about these, of course, but they just left, they could not answer the question. who is this people? they know who they are elite, which the people should be listening to, and the people told them to go, get out, and in no case do not return, but who is the people? here's how to define you, that's who we are, well that's pretty easy to define. and if this is quite a lift from

this, it is quite simple to combine, because these thousands of years of history need to be understood that as a result of 1,000 years of history appeared appeared in this sense in relation to civilization. it can be said that unica civilization is multinational and much religious, in which the unifying essence is above ethnic and above religious and in principle. there is no such thing in the world. is there a different degree of progress along this path? well, there is no such thing in the world , it is a unique civilizational product. here it's here. i am responsible for this. that's right, it's necessary no, here's what we are, how we differ from them. yes, this is what he wrote about, dostoevsky is russian per person. all people all people are russian, you know, they exist, by the way, the soviet project

invested so much in the creation of this person, if it weren’t for him, maybe he wouldn’t exist, because there is a modernization of the people that took place under the soviet project. this is also the uniqueness of how we differ from the people of azov. how is it different from a liberal european? yes, and how are we different? patriotic american, you can answer right away, you just understand, here you take a video on the material. here is how ours relate to captivity, and how they do it simply on the material and on the material you see, what differs even more and since i have several trips behind me. let me show you, just now this material is here today, as it explains a person. well, speak russian . well, for example, in relation to captivity. special appeal to the russian soldier, keep in mind that the ukrainian army is a volunteer battalion in fact, russian soldiers are not taken prisoner, everyone understands that there is no need to take anyone prisoner, what to do with

you then we have too much of you. you will then be in the khak tribunal, then cry that you feel bad. uh, fed in our uh, in our prisons, so keep in mind, we understand everything and each of our soldiers understands when we look at what you are doing with our cities, when we look at what you are doing with maternity hospitals in hospitals. we blow up our cities, hospitals, kindergartens. our children are in basements. and we just there is no choice. we understand that your nation, in principle, needs to be destroyed. if we want to survive, therefore this war goes on destruction. and our troops, all our people know that no one should be taken prisoner. here, by the way, is the answer. and we have more than four thousand of them. yes, about four and a half ukrainian prisoners. we have about four and a half thousand. yes, we feed them, we feed them, they don't understand that he

quotes poroshenko's famous phrase that their children will sit with you. yes, there are some quotes. first, go sit in the cellars. this is right here about cities about cities. i interrupted myself by saying that i traveled all these years, in the donbass and talked with the fighters constantly and a lot, but nothing like that. he is nothing of the fighters for these eight years there, who have families and children, yes, behind the back, which was shelled under the threat of nothing like that. no. this , by the way, you are talking about europe, how it merges with europeanism by this very thing to destroy us as a nation, all the time i wanted europe well, starting with ivan the terrible and from the concept when they realized that orthodoxy will not disappear new package eurostation. they want to include a sanction against the patriarch. and cyril is a european, purely no, devils. this is centuries old.

you ask, we know who. of course, we know who we are, we sometimes forget. yes, and it's bad. well, how we forgot in the eighties, they forgot very much even and even earlier, because i say there that this is the turning point in which there is a refusal to fall in love with europe well, which has a number of tampas, in fact , yes peter i is well done, because he brought us the science of engineering, and we were able to stand on a par and compete and fight, but there was and this love for europe, where everything is the best, we experienced a few. and dad from the last sixties of the xx century to the present day, well , shoot from the sixties and everything else was before. but we will live it now. they will help us to do this, because what i tell. by the way, this is a staged video. here too, but it is made for them first of all. it

should inspire them and the second you know what it is technical video volodya it should explain to ukrainians. why are there no russian prisoners. why are there so few of them? they do suffer. and by the way, seekers in the context of perceiving the arrestovich danilovs, all the rest, we do not have an exchange fund. it is necessary to capture transnistria with 147 big people. yes , well, about 100, about 100. yes, well, it’s clear that it’s necessary to hide, therefore, this video should explain to ukraine why they weren’t imputed to anyone, and by the way, based on against four and a half thirty azov people, they began not to take prisoners on azov . look with the azov people. there is another story here, you can see it all. here's how. how to say? by the way, today yevgeny yanovich said, great. yes, look how the entire igilov structure was reproduced on azov, the structure of an instant difference. that's it

. we are for ent- that is, firstly, they admitted that these are hostages. they hide behind them once and they are ready to exchange them for the resources they need two, which means, uh. well, here's what the people who worked in syria in iraq and so on said. this is an absolute technique technique, igilovskaya evgeny he said, why are you surprised instructor yes, the same instructors are the same, like igil, like azov, people from british intelligence and american intelligence teach this tactic and all this behavior, as if we they didn’t know where you parted from this very forbidden igil is also an interesting thing about the state of the book, it’s called the ideology of statehood. and here you need to understand what happened to the post-soviet space. they had to make up for the lack of history and

experience of statehood nationalism and nazism forced. this is not an excuse. well, in the sense that there was nothing to sculpt there was nothing to sculpt. and by the way, well, the british know all this very well, they perfectly sat down on top of this, parasitizing perfectly. and ukraine is happy from two things now, and we must clearly understand this. they realized that there is a coin with two sides. on the one hand, it was allowed. nazism racism against russians and allowed them to kill, and moreover, they give privileges for if you kill well, and this is that the genuine western system, in which part of ukraine joined with pleasure, joined with pleasure and took this place which of our writers is published with pleasure abroad. those who constantly breed russophobes which of the

directors are invited to many film festivals those who hate the power of the russian people, but we endured all this, we pretended that we were entering europe, we signed up for the project of destroying russian identity and signed not even in the ninety-first year, de facto signed gorbachev well, we never did. well, let him be deceived. let him not understand the role they play, but we still have not made a conclusion. well, at the end of 50-60, this desire took shape, especially in these circles it was called the sixties. the intelligentsia also appeared there. they were not in power. excuse me, but raisa maksimovna gorbachev and all these pupils of all this time and these circles in

quotation marks of circles and these circles. gorbachev what do you want i'm talking about the personal quality of the stavropol tractor driver, volodya and i'm interested in the system, which made the stavropol tractor driver general secretary. you understand that correctly, don't you? this is the right question of the system, but in its pure form, of course, it has already formalized the betrayal of national interests and ideological failures. and the way he let all these people in here, we still can’t uproot them to this day. well, we're actually writhing badly. well, if we return to the present from gorbachev, then, of course, we live in conditions of a total war that leads to the post and it has long ceased to be the west and has become the west, because he squandered all his foundations which were built by christian western, civilization, a tractor driver - this is good excellent. no, it's a great job. then they have to get a divorce,

yes, a tank businessman. yes, an expensive problem, when you grow up along the party line, they try to increase your intellectual level, when you graduated from moscow state university, but the feeling that you were doing something else in public work there. i'm not even talking about the accent. i'm not talking about incoherent speech. i'm talking about the level, we can not all the time was immediately, after talking with him, she said it was possible to deal with him, because he was ready to be such a bad boy who, for a jar of jam, a basket of cookies, everyone loved him betrayed the country. and so about the price. no, this is a very important remark, because the whole country of a man is now the whole country, so that she understands, accordingly, the whole country. i am a young man. it felt and saw nothing from april 85 somewhere in the year, the summer of the eighty- seventh year was in a state of euphoria and

mikhail sergeevich was doing good because in compared with e. gerontocracy to the kremlin, of course, he was talkative. he was young active and he went out to the people. and here it is, uh, well, in fact, i bribed it, as if something was not understanding of large processes, society was not ready for this. well, today's affairs yes, to this total war that the post-west is waging against our country in all directions, but even monuments participate in this war, in fact, knocking down the monument to zoya kosmodemyanskaya with a noose around the neck. v. chernigov she was hanged for the second time posthumously on this once. yes, the bizhu mocked her, he was joyfully applauded by all this ekhovskaya bastard. yes, removed from the pedestals t-34 tanks. in fact, too, go into battle again this time the metaphysical battle for our memory. so because of our future, in fact,

hmm, a war is being waged against e russia as absolutely right. it was said very specifically here, uh, a multinational civilization, a lot of religious, well, a lot of cultural and against, but our victoriousness, which fixi in our entire history through the most difficult years, many years retreats, but the return is to that of his statehood.

hello, i'm already in crimea, the weather is wonderful 30 degrees, no one is rushing to the most interesting place, when i tell them about what i feel, they listen, but they don't hear. and that's bad. no one can rewrite our history. this is just one of the folders prepared by the soviet accusations for the international military tribunal in nuremberg. well, no one will close the borders for us. always together always online so strong. wow, it doesn’t seem to break, we are watching the masterpieces of the world documentary classics new items exclusives without

registration. or on the site it was decided to entrust your film group with the shooting of material for this film, do not be afraid of responsibility, the material will be watched by the first oscar and this war is not only against russians, this is a war against armenians, belarusians, ukrainians, jews, and

millions, but representatives of different peoples who are in those who lived in the soviet union defeated nazism and their descendants today. so , by the way, e does not put a sign of identity between nazism and anti-semitism. that is nazism does not necessarily have to be anti-semitism. yes, of course, this is what the americans stick together all the time speaking zelensky, but already the jews. it cannot be nazism. how else can it just not be. here it is, no, no, no, fascism is all together. this is a fas. it was not fascism. so, but nazism may not be anti-semitic, or it may be anti-slavic anti-russian, of course, what it is what is ukrainian to this, so it turns out that this is a war against our victoriousness and this is not a reaction. and by the way, here let's say the current moment. for example, the same

war of monuments against st. george ribbons against the celebration of victory day and so on, in fact. uh, those are hmm specific steps. we are witnessing today the revival of the global nazi project in its time - this was perfectly recorded by the well-known novelists yulian semyonov. he put into the words uh, these words the mouth of his character. but this is not a literary invention. it's really. the quintessential position of the nazis. so this character said those who are now 10 years. and they don't need us. they will never forgive us hunger and bombings, but uh, those who will come in 20 years will look at us, they will need storytellers as a legend, they will need uh, people who will promote these ideas and they will appear and

now then when it is first pronounced instead of a word. hello in the personal address the word heil. from now on, we will begin our great revival , muller said that, as we know, the head is the pope and, i repeat, this is not a writer's eduka. these are the words of thought that fixed the relationship, escaped hiding nazis the future. well, of course, no, not an outstanding writer, heinrich müller , probably, i don’t think, they made a mistake, probably, in one time lag. not 20 years later, a little later, this happened, and they probably made a mistake not in that, or rather, they probably could not even imagine that this was the renaissance according to muller. yes, this great renaissance will begin on the territory of the former soviet union, which won, but rather the nazi

beast. uh, why a global project? i said a global nazi project, because ukraine - this place. where does this origin begin, but without the support of great britain of the countries of the british commonwealth of the united states of america of the european union , this ideology does not work, and moreover, look. eh, what we are seeing is that this is the globality it is directed here as well. vladimir vladimirovich has already said not in a modern form, not only against even here, there anti is like anti-semitism against russians, but against everything connected with today, uh, a turkish journalist sent me a wonderful video where a boy is walking along streets, like here at the turkish town and listen loudly on the phone. e russian music suits him. uh, the representative of ukraine and suddenly

starts talking. why are you listening to russian music here? and this is nobody. yes, because these are turkish journalists in lviv and, accordingly. eh, this is the relationship. uh, because i don't like ukrainian, because russians say i'm azeri. he says, listen ukrainian is absolutely right. but the important thing is that this post is the west. he used the ukrainians, and in for many decades. uh, as the biomass from which these orcs were formed , the new curtain-sh assault squads, which today in particular are sitting, were waiting for efficiency. we have because we did not work. yes, we owe this global and with ours. this is what we need first of all, yes, to form and remind

whom to work in our country. led, that is, there is nothing wrong with that. just in another. what's in them to accuse of this today they worked in ukraine ukraine was in a friendly fraternal state the question for us is correct, the talk show does not prohibit anything. we have. it's just that we could work, that we could carry, they worked as presenters, and the dialogues of the state were not e was forbidden. now it is prohibited, as the constitution turns out. well, we on earth we will definitely win. i have no doubts, but in we will not win if we do not offer our global project, yes, there will be no global project for us because there with understand locally, because if we do not set such a task for vladimir dodolfovich. we need to solve locally. we have people now. listen, i was in mariupol. i looked at the

military guys there, they are all right. here they clearly know. that's where the enemies are, where the friends are. i, of course, because we need to pull up, we need to collect our own. no need to try to make a global one will lead to losses, because it is perceived that global projects win. like communism, for example. well, he’s not here, but he’s in his time, right, he’s still like of course there is. yes, of course, there are at least six of them, but this is chinese communism. yes? no, there, of course, there is a title that he won in our country. yes, this is a feature. when we even talk about communism in the soviet union, we have only been crushed into a national form due to this, and we managed to bring it to us. this is our

eternal attempt to escape into the global, and we are losing the people. first, i agree. secondly, if you look at the material. damn, democracy is global. figas 2 for 40 countries will be these because of the western world, which and so it was, it does not come out of the americans. there is no agreement with your neighbor, you need a political platform. that's what i convince there is good, by the way, by the way, the concept of liberal democracy. in general, it has spread throughout the world. and it is colonial in nature. and then he crushes everywhere. well, we must also offer something, why should the world listen, everything is built very simply in america , they work, what hollywood here they show says, we want it too, correctly i say, there are no problems just about, then they get it turns out not true. you want to say that the soviet project was not global, it just wasn’t globa, but it survived when it abandoned globality. that's right, that as soon as he refused when only gorbachev

subscribed to globality, stalin did not, only the gay world revolution refused to become miro the system of socialism was a classical form, but again it was crushed everywhere under national specifics. i will tell you more harshly the world system of socialism was called politically correct soviet rhetoric, fixed by the yalta preservation of our occupation of eastern europe well, it was. no, well, not only did it not take it, it was not included in the world, firstly, if you look at it, it really passed. now now now now now now laos vietnam cubes three different cases there, if you look at the philosophical view of cuba they of course, for a long time were much closer to trotskyism to mauismo and not a word of them, whatever, so they were very different in their own way . what was my idea that we could certainly help?

about my ideological project, by no means am i i want to propose, do not ask in russia, we will offer people our project. we don't need anyone global, we start from russia, but it should be interesting. everyone does not need this to be the biggest misconception. what is interesting? everyone has. here our people begin to live. okay. if people around see that the power of truth and understanding comes from us, then they come to us. otherwise, this always ends with the tower of babel, when the project tries to become global and subjugate the whole world. it is always doomed to fail because god there is the tower of babel all interested ended in bad advertising.