the capitals of the reich, which hit the myth of the invulnerability of the nazis, and here is the kazakh military thriller in the summer of 1941, the film tells about a small detachment that must break out of the encirclement in early september forty-first, the blockade of leningrad began, which lasted 872 days to the feat of women laying a section of the railway line under fire, gone down in history as the victory road is dedicated to the painting of the corridor of immortality by fedor popov, the heroine of the girl, risking and sacrificing their lives, saved the besieged leningrad helps deliver cargo to the besieged city on high. at the box office you can also see the british film operation minced meat with colin firth in the title role and its plot may seem like a fiction, but this is a historical fact in the forty-third year, the british scouts deceived the german intelligence services by planting false documents on them, according to which

the allied forces were supposed to invade to europe via greece and sardinia, while the real target was sicily. this forced hitler to prepare the transfer of reserves, including from the eastern on the eve of the front, the decisive battles near kursk, and finally we will remind you again, and the capture of berlin by the long-awaited end of the war tells a film recreated in 4k format. the release of the director's last assault. front-line soldier yury ozerov was led by the director general of the mosfilm film concern shakhnazarov . i watched the last episode the most, not so long ago i watched it in the hall , i was simply amazed at all, how it is. outstanding from prices. there, the subway flooding scene is a unique amount, in general, only to the world canon, someone who has not been done. in addition to cinemas,

good military films can be watched, of course, on tv on may 9 on tv channel russia 1 we will have a big premiere, a military drama, directed by timur bekmambetov and sergey trofimov, the picture is based on real events and tells about the hero of the patriotic war mikhail petrovich devyatayev. he made a daring escape from german captivity. stole, while the newest modernized enemy bomber and handed over to the motherland the enemy’s plans to launch weapons retribution fau missiles, thereby bringing our victory closer, the main role in this film was played by actor pavel priluchny, also in the frame you can see timofey trintsev. pavel chinarev and dmitry lysenkov. went through uh, 8 and did it nicely and came back. well, to be honest, i bow to what he did and how he did the film the territory will show on may 9th at 21:20. on

channel russia 1 on the big screens of the country one of the most ambitious and complex domestic animation projects has finally come out, the full-length film suvorov is a great journey, created by the efforts of three companies of the gorky film studios at once, animation studios kinoatis and the giant soyuzmultfilm. this tape, unusual in genre, combines historical, biographical and adventure elements, but it is based on a very simple love story of a simple serf, grisha and the daughter of a wealthy merchant. and where is suvorov here, you ask about this of ours, reportage alexander vasilyevich suvorov one of those generals. what do parents tell their children about? after all, his science of winning can come in handy in life, and now the soyuzmultfilm studio, together with partners, introduces young viewers to the legendary commander in a fascinating adventure animated story by grisha ver. so beloved and sony not just like that,

but a real hero from the famous swiss campaign of suvorov, under whose leadership he has the honor to serve, we received in this form, you know , some kind of heavy historical practically documentary, action movie. you can even say that he repeated several pudovka films for 1940 , but for us we wanted to make a film for the mass audience for family viewing. and of course, to small viewers. it was interesting, so we redid it. we added adventures there, added fantasies there, it was seasoned a lot with fiction, so to speak, and all historical events, animated suvorov with love and as similar as possible to his historical prototype. each of his appearances on the screen causes awe and brings wisdom. afraid means to distinguish. is it possible to turn off the fear because the road is needed. where does rejection never wait for you two. in short, seven times more dangerous, but we

created it faster than suvorov, relying on his engravings for historical portraits and even recreating sculptures recreated this image. we even have a bust, really without suvorov, which stood all the time of our production. he watched us, that is, and we looked at him. we are a little hmm rejuvenated him rejuvenated. yes, because for the movie he is younger, in which in reality he was suvorov, a great journey, a large-scale project, so soyuzmultfilm approached him on an appropriate scale, including the sounding, for example, of the commander himself, the father of all soldiers, is voiced by people's artist of russia konstantin khabensky and as musical accompaniment for the first time in decade recorded symphony orchestra, symphony orchestra. this is generally a very wonderful huge plus for any

animated film well, in general, in principle, for any film, and a feature film in particular, because it's a completely different sound than in theaters. well , when viewed, it gives a different volume of sounds in general and for more than 50 years soyuzmultfilm did not invite a symphony orchestra to sound its cartoons. the last one was mowgli. meanwhile, the black comedy is still on at the box office. and throw away the continuation of reflections on a difficult family and domestic violence started in the film dad, die, for which director kirill sokolov received a prize at the window to europe film festival and also won success to the public and criticism abroad about how and why cyril filmed this movie. yes, even with tarantino. as critics point out. the director himself told in an interview with the film industry. that's why i'm

here. leaving the colony, olga wants to take her ten-year-old daughter from her mother, a tyrant. however, she meets her daughter with a knife, having managed to return the girl, olga goes on the run, but the grandmother is not going to give away her beloved granddaughter just like that. this plot is based on a real story from the past of the director's wife victoria korotkov, but at the same time there is a lot of thinking out of exaggeration and grotesque, therefore, the wife's relatives did not recognize themselves and did not stop communicating with their son-in-law after the release of the picture, this is a small episode from the childhood of victoria short executive from the main roles, but, because when there was a lot of order, there were 10 years old, and her parents. all the time they gave her to live as a grandmother , she decided that it would be better to raise her than for vika and did not want to give her back to her parents. my grandmother had to literally steal her from the house to

divert her attention to go characters. in general, they are not similar to their prototypes. completely tear off and throw away this story, not the separation and as a result of domestic violence, this makes the film. especially relevant is the character of oleg, who is very soft in itself, very controversial, and it seems that such a whole romantic is touching, but then we see her a scene where he is, uh, drunk, and he beats, so, uh, mercilessly his girlfriend. yes? this is a very classic story for russia and especially for the regions. yes, domestic violence is a huge problem. here, despite the fact that this is only the second feature film, kirill sokolov managed to to attract very cool actors anna mikhalkova and alexander yatsenko to the project, and they appear in mbas that are unusual for them, this time everything was much easier, because it was very difficult to find actors for dad, because everyone read the scripts, but what is it about ? no? what's the

madness? but this time it was still easier, because people have already seen them or already understood approximately what it could result in and for a very long time, for example, i was looking for an actress for a role. on mikhalkov e, fabric did not work. i came in general, i propose a different role, the role of a bully, but she came to the script and said that she wanted to try her grandmother, and i was surprised, because she, in general, is a mother, a young and beautiful, and but she really wanted to, we tried sasha yatsenko and everything became into place. leave the price tag, as far as i understand, he's just a westerner. he really wanted to star in westerns. he came and said. i hope it will be like wester. i say, well part of it. as he says, i'm all in business. it was the easiest and fastest casting ever. now oh films that you can watch at the cinema with the whole family at the box office. adventure comedy artek big trip. the main roles in the film are played by mikhail galustyan yan tsapnik nadezhda mikhalkova ekaterina klimova and other stars

of russian cinema. in artek, they found a meeting point between the child, the present and the adult soviet past, trying to make a light movie about the possibility of a difficult dialogue. in the eternal conflict of the generation, the heroes of the film modern teenagers on the summer shift at the famous pioneer camp, without much faith in a miracle, they recklessly make the most secret at the tree of desires, not realizing that it is magical, how much the tree for some reason transfers them to the eighty-eighth year. in artek, the childhood of their parents, mothers, and fathers, who today are 40 with a little further, the quest begins to return back to the heroes. we'll have to make friends and act together, despite the very large cultural differences in the film is really a lot. in the role of small, but bright mikhail galustyan in the picture is also the producer of the key argument for agreement, uh stars widely known. i used, of course, a simple

word - this is a children's movie. and it opens almost any door. now there are so few children's films in russian cinema. it is practically non-existent, cinema for children, and it is with children and about children , cinema in which children take part. they are a movie in which adults take part, and this movie is about children, everything has turned out here, this is a movie about children for children with children directly, all the main characters are very different, one of the guys is a musician. someone dreams of becoming someone's pilot comes a streamer career. artek, at first, becomes the point of collision of two different childhoods, soviet and modern, but mutual interest is born in the collision. a holiday camp is, of course, a society for children. this means connecting with peers. it is very important. at first glance, such pictures are just, but such fundamental ones as friendship and mutual assistance are laid down. a family values, and the ability to help each other in a difficult situation. it's all inherent in such

pictures of the children's producers of the film armen aneken believe that the artek children's center is probably the only place from the past a childhood dream that still unites children all over the country. the filming took place in the spring of 2019 and many children in the extras were real students of the camp and the first screenings also took place there, the children were more than delighted . i think kids are such a serious critic. they are very hard to deceive. they are spontaneous children stood up and clapped. a lot of people were crying. they actively commented while watching sang along really very good movie artek got a big trip at the box office from april 28. you watched the film industry, fresh, portion, new products and stories of creating interesting films on our air in a week, see you at the cinema.

the death rate in finnish concentration camps in 1942

exceeded the death rate in german grandmothers and children in search of food violated the ban on the hip to eat non- aryan blood. our children had details of corpses, and their limbs were tied.

hello, i'm already in crimea, the weather is wonderful 30 degrees, no one rushes to the most interesting place, when i tell them about what i feel, they they listen, but they don't hear. and that's bad. no one can rewrite our history. this is just one of the folders prepared by the soviet accusations for the international military tribunal in nuremberg. no one will always close their borders for us. always

on the internet is so strong. wow, the froze will not break, we are watching the masterpieces of world documentary films gagarin, he is a hero, a real hero, but we are now very lacking in classics, new exclusives. 15 years you miss free without registration

heart you do not want peace you are here. you do not you see, young family vasily, he’s not your time. perhaps or not along the streets of moscow

hello on the air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events of the week chronicle facts comments new militarization of germany from new weapons to language materials of our program the first lessons of the ukrainian crisis modern aspects of hostilities the opinion of a former

un inspector after the battle the economy the prospects for an oil embargo a story from turkey one of the largest living german philosophers yurgenhabermas, a representative of the famous frankfurt school, fell into the category of putinists in his old age the 92-year-old thinker was subjected to ostracism for a note in judo scores, where he warned against supplying weapons to ukraine, firstly, the country thus risks entering into a direct conflict with russia's nuclear superpower, and secondly, this for habermass, more important is the anti-war, peace-loving political culture that germany painfully acquired after the second world war was threatened by paramilitary rhetoric and militant enthusiasm back in law. for the first time after

the second world war, the german language returns to military vocabulary on this topic, a large article was published by the newspaper tagis, spiegel, as the professor notes, rhetoricians, joachim, knappe, now former generals appear on television almost every evening and use military terms like that how, during a pandemic, virologists suddenly appeared out of nowhere to talk about aerosols and superspreaders in prime talk show guests discuss the differences between mardas and cheetahs leopards and cougars are verbally armed. the militarization of language, says political scientist karl rudolf korte. it shows the culture of restraint that we have known for decades. this part of the declared historical turning point of the war is simply disintegrating - this is also the battle for words continues. koftas no one,

for example, can accurately determine what exactly constitutes heavy weapons or offensive and defensive weapons. what exactly is the difference kurtoya stands for healthy distrust. we must show linguistic vigilance. this means that we should not simply repeat these new terms. after all. everything. this can indeed lead to problematic jingoism. according to him, journalists are particularly sensitive. now there is a high density of imperatives. send heavy weapons. shut up the sky, and that's exactly what people in this military atmosphere are willing to listen to. german establishment militarization does not bother with the population the issue is more difficult chancellor olaf-scholz on pervomaisky at the rally, with a passion atypical for him, he convinced the need for military supplies, the audience whistled.

we will continue to support ukraine with humanitarian aid money, but this must also be said, we will support them with weapons, like other european countries, so that they can defend themselves. it is necessary for the scientific service of the bundestan to take care of the legal problem of military assistance to ukraine. interesting arms deliveries do not make germany a party to the conflict. but the training of the ukrainian military in handling it is likely. can germany to be considered a combatant with this question, we started a conversation with a very combative interlocutor scottter american military analyst, a former un inspector and at some point, a vocal critic of us policy, doubts about the topics raised by our interlocutor. no, if you supply weapons to the belligerent side, you cease to be neutral, there are no questions. the question is, what will

the opposing side do, for example. the ussr and china actively helped vietnam during the war, which they did americans, we attacked china, russia , no, but we interfered with the delivery of weapons by armed methods, russia clearly and clearly stated what it would do? it is now so there is nothing to talk about at all. all those who supply weapons are parties to the conflict. the korean war between the north and south of the fifties is partly considered as the confrontation between the united states and its allies with communist china and the soviet union in the northern coalition was supported by the chinese people's volunteers and the ussr, which, as china officially did not participate in the war, but financed and armed chinese troops from the south of the war, the united states and 15 other countries under the un flag, hostilities in vietnam began in the mid-fifties, as a

civil war in the south of the country in the sixty-fifth on the side of the south vietnamese regime openly the united states and its allies in the siatu military bloc entered, china and the soviet union provided large-scale financial technical and military assistance to the government of north vietnam in the country there were many soviet military advisers and specialists. the wangule civil war began in the seventy-fifth year and lasted 27 years about the marxist group mp la, which was supported by the ussr, cuba was opposed by another group, unita, it was supported by the united states and south africa, which opposed the spread of soviet influence on the african continent when cia director william kolbe was asked why the us supports the fnl he said the simplest answer would be that the soviets support the empla in afghanistan in the 79th to 89th

years of the contingent soviet troops were opposed, numerous, by groups that were generously financed by the cia, pakistani intelligence and a number of countries of the islamic world, the taliban movement, which eventually seized power in the country, was also originally under the patronage of the us and pakistani intelligence services today. moomin , libya and syria became vivid examples of proxy wars, the united states played a key role in the overthrow of muammar gaddafi, france and other nato countries in syria, the laws of the bashar government, assad support russia and iran on side of the syrian opposition usa europe turkey and a number of arab states. scott, is it possible already now to draw any conclusions about the outcome of hostilities in ukraine what's new we learned about military affairs, we already knew that modern warfare is extremely lethal. the sides use very

effective weapons that bring significant casualties and destruction, this is confirmed. well, the main choice is not a new basic military mathematics, no one has canceled. who has the superiority in firepower here and ultimately takes over the field. boya, ukrainian the side may be making impressive tactical gains, but the strategically obvious move is on the russian side, since it has a decisive advantage in artillery, missile systems and air weapons . but there is the experience of recent companies. the americans in iraq, afghanistan, the saudis in libya, a total technological superiority, do not bring success. yes, what you mention. these are conflicts of low intensity, when one of the parties has an overwhelming advantage, including military technology. does not fight with an equal in strength opponents, a group of insurgents partisans who are able to simply dissolve on the ground, mix with civilians, but in each

case, without exception, when direct clashes took place, the american military emerged victorious in a direct collision, the technological advantage is 100% victory guarantee a low-intensity conflict. this is a political war. there. the main thing is to win smart and hearts, convincing arguments are needed if the population perceives you as occupiers of the case bad, but when it comes to the clash of the largest armies in europe professionally well armed and trained. this is a completely different matter here the question of the level of equipment. after the collapse of the ussr, ukraine received the fourth largest army in the country, nuclear weapons were deployed from the soviet army, ukraine received more than 8,000 tanks 11,000 armored personnel carriers and almost 3,000 aircraft and helicopters, nuclear weapons were taken to russia as a result of diplomatic

agreements with the participation of the united states over the past a quarter of a century was lost. and everything else accumulated over the years, military wealth, most of the units of the formations were disbanded, and all high-quality military equipment was sold abroad. almost all of the country's defense enterprises were closed immediately after the change of regime in 2014. the new authorities set a course to create a modern armed forces on the model of nato. small arms and heavy weapons still make up the soviet legacy in the rear. you can even meet machine guns, maxim and dshk own tank. the stronghold turned out to be too expensive for the army, and the problem of air defense was solved not by quality, but by quantity, due to the old soviet systems

, basic units appeared from the innovation.