in afghanistan yesterday we were supplying jihadists who fought against assad like putin is an evil man, but

does that mean american taxpayers should unload their enemies without further investigation? i don't think so, which is why we never have a real debate. on these issues, it's easier to talk about preserving democracy. if we find a state of war, and as congressong mollton said, then why don't we vote properly to allow the use of force of war, or we are going to act in ukraine as in yemen as all over the world, that is, to wage undeclared wars. i think many will be against the debate, because the real goal of these politicians is to change the regimes of russia and not to protect ukraine, they are ready to send billions of dollars to kiev, which will line the pockets of crowned officials exactly like when it was done in afghanistan we see going to war, and the american people do not i know. sorry for quite a

long time, but of course, this voice is always in the minority, but curious nonetheless, please. i , this speech and, in general, those speeches that lately, they don’t give us any reason to doubt at all that the issue here is not something that is not about ukraine. it’s even a question. not so much about the confrontation with russia, which concerns only russia, we are talking about a systemic crisis in which the american side puts it first of all. eh, my purpose. uh, absolutely dominance in the first place, ideological value. probably the rest of humanity is very bright about this. it seems to me that she said, if i'm not mistaken, the deputy minister of finance, but to america, which said that we are like to the global financial and economic order, as its instrument, we will admit only those countries that have liberal democracies, that behave morally and share our

values. here, since if i am not mistaken, that pingauer said that a person is a metaphysical being, he cannot, without metaphysics at all. olga buzova can't do without it, yes, yes, when she heard it, she thought that she looked up so many words at the same time wikipedia, it is unknown , meaning that a person cannot exist. only today, only with what surrounds him in the present moment, he still has to be driven by goals and values ​​that are often associated with uh, such. uh sometimes, let's say it can be. um, maybe a sacred connection with the ancestors. sometimes it may be religious traditions, which are the strongest of all metaphysical ones. well, just like in the west, it is quite predictable. a few centuries ago, one could observe acute crises of religious christian values. there, this role was gradually taken over by values liberalism that now claim

to be a religious home that should be debatable, it should not be debatable, either you share them or you don't deserve any right to continue to exist about it. we are quite open today. they say you have to be moral. what is morality in this world. so i saw the speech of the madam, psaki, who said that it was simply blasphemously unimaginable. and that such cruelty, which she observes today, is due to the fact that children are not allowed to choose their gender before the age of 18, that if this is not put an end to, it is not at all clear what the future of this country will be according to the law, yes, and she really had tears. it’s just, uh, so this is one example of such morality, and in fact we are told directly that this world will be a world in which the struggle will be conducted on the basis of very powerful e-value systems, first of all,

that will be opposed to each other , that is, here it is. about what you know, here are some specific interests in a particular state. eh, this speech is directed not only towards russia, i think this speech was listened to very carefully in china as well, which absolutely definitely does not fit into these values, the benchmarks that the americans were talking about this speech should have been. it seems to me to listen very carefully in the islamic world, which absolutely does not fit these criteria of latin america. africa is not at all one side of the world that is going to follow its own cultural religious historical traditions, no longer has the right to exist and to enjoy access to these tools. obviously, to fight against this mechanically, that is, when we are opposed to a whole value system. and in response to this, we are simply trying somewhere with diplomacy, somewhere. uh, heroically conducted special operations. we are trying to fight these mechanical ways to me, not opposing

our own concept, but to win in such a confrontation. it is very difficult, because our rivals clearly outline the picture of the future for us, they clearly explain. what are they striving for and what will they bring all the surrounding humanity to. in response to this, at best, we are trying to prove to them that you and we correspond to your values. why do you say that we are an authoritarian state, we are a democratic state, although democratic authoritarian and totalitarian states. it's basically an invention. the west is not this is not some. e given nature, which is mandatory. this is one of three. well we 're trying, of course not. we accordingly it to us they say that our political system does not function in accordance with the expectations of european countries. we say no. it functions for us, the way your function should. it functions worse for you and we constantly play the game with the rules that are imposed on us and try to win in that game the rules that refereeing, which the jury, which are absolutely not

with us and the fact that we are an orthodox country, i think, was it would be very appropriate here for us to take the confucian principle, which states that in order to control the outside world. first we need to govern ourselves if we really want to uh promote the image of a conservative country the image of a country that uh has uh a proposal for the outside world that we oppose globalism and all other manifestations of this liberal such idealism would be nice. it seems to me that we should start ourselves first of all, because it is quite obvious that we have significant problems with this, connected primarily with the sphere of culture. and in the field of education. there is a lot to work on for us and in the practice of trying to sit on two chairs to sit out from being silent. uh, classes will focus the position. i think her time

is absolute. yes, that's how the real he is, he just frightened me. here is such a position. i think that it is absolutely time to end with this position, because we are already seeing such a vivid transformation of the position of such people who opposed, uh, our special operation has begun. it is from the fact that all of russia is against it. well , what to do? no russians want this. well, how did it become clear that over 80% of the population gradually began to talk about the population of russia, not we, but they and the population of russia became those. who , like today, i don’t even want to pronounce this last name. the phrase has already been spoken today. here is another such fugitive that russia has no right to continue to exist, that it simply must be destroyed. but this is to speak in the output, that is, countries that i do not deny, people can disagree with the social with the economic policy, whatever. but when your state

is fighting against saying that your country needs to be destroyed is exactly the same as saying that your parents need to be destroyed , your family needs to be destroyed. uh, all your loved ones, there is no difference, there is absolutely no difference between this and gradually. we understand that if these people nevertheless take an active public policy position, they constantly speak out. but at the same time, they say that the population of this country does not understand anything, it is not suitable for anything, you can’t deal with it at all, because that they support the special operation. eh, what are they counting on, apparently that they will be able to return here only when there is already a colonial administration, that no one will ask this population, that no one will return, and the people asked the cost in general, the person wants. i think the people quite clearly say that the people want a successful large-scale completion of special operations, which will fully fulfill those goals that are permanent, except for the team. i think the people who want.

people don't want much more. that's just to there, the operation is understandable, the people demand something else, the people demand to abandon the meanness of the nineties , the people demand answers to all the questions that we, by the way, in this studio constantly pose to give a historical assessment of this stage of our development. people want to understand, and what are we talking about here? i just gave a lecture there yesterday and there are big people holding big positions, and they ask me one question. they say, you tell me. why does it even make sense? the existence of russia and our people, i say, actually, consider positions, which you occupy is you must give me the answer to this question. they are i to you, but the people who want a deep answer. the people want to be told, that is, what is there, you, we are not butting heads with ukraine. for us, this is not a question at all. if you set this task, you would

finally use the army, and not the forces there. 15% of the peacetime army and the people, therefore, they say, listen, let's already security is also an intermediate stage. let's talk about ourselves about what we see in the future with this constitution in which says that we should not have an ideology. and we are offered more than strange definitions of democratic freedoms. they, accordingly, what we think of ourselves, we feel the people in general, this is not a simple question, and more i absolutely agree. and you know, if we draw such an analogy, that the people and our country are such a collective, single person, biologically in any person. the most. the main instinct. most importantly, his goal is to preserve his own genes of his own kind and his continuation of his own is not just of some kind, namely, in the first place, in fact, any people, any nation. first of all, it

strives to preserve itself historically, to preserve its type in the future. and we, therefore, want to be not just a big country, not just dominate and have a great influence in the world. it can't be pointless. we want this in order to survive, how the people will survive, as a culture, as a civilization. and if we can't do it in the future, then this world will be deprived. e thousand-year history of russian culture because we see that our opponents, they are not against the current political leadership of russia, they are trying to fight for them. this is just an intermediate link that should introduce to what is fully said. it is necessary to destroy russia completely. do you understand that they deny he is in the blood? in short, yes, i rested on the word legally. yes, for us, legitimacy, then the topic for us was saying that we see something else. they generally believe that

not only a russian person should not exist, but a mention of russian culture of no russian world should not be absolutely culture should not be literature should not be theater should not be cinema should be there should not be monuments there should be no mention. in principle, this is a fairly systematic attempt to destroy everything that is not there the first time. you can name at least one. telecardigen you can generally name at least something that would be related to the culture of carthage, despite the fact that we understand that if carthage opposed the roman empire for such a period of time and in military plan was successful in different periods of history, which means, for sure, it was not a small economy, not a small culture, of course, and where it was all erased, everything was destroyed, and there are a lot of such examples in the world. i don't understand what they are talking about. they feel like the heirs of rome

. they see themselves that way. we'll have to defeat them carthage must be destroyed. well , of course, now they repeat it in poland in london in washington in berlin the same phrase, trying to make a new carthage out of you hadi yakovich took it if the word was taken, continue, i just i wanted to conclude by saying that in order to actually win, uh, a convincing victory, which we all strive for and everyone is healthy and our population in our country strive for this, there is no need to wait in order to carry out systemic reform changes now in order to to change all these problematic issues, about which we are talking about it. it is as if from the creators remember when it was. uh, the coronavirus was raging. went. rumor has it that on the 20th everyone will be locked up, everyone will be imprisoned. then let's after the holidays. then after the new year, then after the may holidays, then

after the holidays. so, as it were, we are all the time waiting for something in order for the special operation to be successfully completed, we need to wait not for it to be completed, we started reforms, but on the contrary, now we need to carry out the most important changes and structural reforms in order to sing the operation to be completed . not that we will win, and then in europe they will already begin to discuss changing them in return. no, we have to play on all platforms. i want to bring here. eh, in conclusion such an example. see how they interact with us. uh, let's say turkey creates 10 problems around us so that we can get a concession on each of them. a concession here, a concession there. then they got into syria, we will negotiate with you. there in the balkans, the south caucasus is the middle everywhere we are forced to negotiate. somewhere we yield in order to get something somewhere. we are now reduced to the fact that a problem has been artificially created for us at our borders in ukraine , our historical territory, and we are constantly we are trying either to give in ourselves, or to get some kind of compromises on the territory that

was imposed on us from the outside in a completely artificial way, instead of creating problems around ourselves and constantly trying to put pressure on other problems, so that by the way about problems. i've told about the problem on terekhov's frontier pant. i want to thank the people. i got a call from everyone who answered this question. everyone was severely punished there. we talked about problems with russian citizenship alexander alekseevich einstein at home posted all the decisions made in 2 weeks , the issue is being considered and people receive our compatriots abroad russian citizenship. that is, finally. here is the hardest question. so, it turns out, when there is a desire, we can solve it. why is this not possible before? why not before? but do you know that the war began? no, i'll say it, so it's the same as well, why wasn't i born 15 minutes earlier. then i would n’t be late for anything well, sorry, sergey alexandrovich if i was born, no, i arranged it 10 years earlier

i’m so upset that no one will ever destroy my state. there are works of democracy. so he said and returned, you asked alexandrovich well, i didn’t have a service weapon that in the ninety-first year, go out and take people with you and prevent it. i fall beloved state colleague. well, let's fix it. here, a very important thought was voiced that the west had been preparing for a long time and now they are embarking on the final solution of the russian issue. it's just that now they've been going to this for a long time, we've done it many times we discussed it based on all those networks of benefactors of these sleepers that have existed in our country and, unfortunately, still exist, so this is the first thing i would like to object to you a little about western values. i believe that all this is absolutely a manipulation tool. here are the contradictions. no, they are only interested in making money. yes, we see it now. well, in the philippines, the who yes son of mega corrupt brand samarka with the younger one becomes president and the usa is waiting for him with open arms, because it is within their

concept of a son of a bitch, but their son of a bitch will be, therefore, they will have problems with him. they just bet on the great boxer. yes, they didn’t agree with marcos there near kiev. no, there ’s compromising evidence there. you can through it normally. oh who do you want? fished in the philippines. but that means, in fact, the congressman said everything, why 40 billion dollars are given away not part of mexico what is the president of mexico the abrador screaming about, fighting in hysterics there, because the humanitarian crisis on the southern borders of the states help mexico help central america to solve. real problems. this is unprofitable, because it is necessary to give 40 billion to ukraine so that, well, it is clear that five or three alone will reach ukraine. that is, it is an amazing opportunity to master all this. and that 's why all of these here, just like afghanistan, we are talking about why such a collective insanity. well, actually, again, comrade, speaking congressman. all said, if you're trying to talk about real issues, who are you,

putin's wing of the republican party senator, rand paul, who's blocking the spinoff? right here they take out some photographs where he is there with our politicians of some kind of reception, he says, all out, spy. i hope at least one photo of at least one american politician, who is it? could have avoided us. a graph of a rumble kissing a biden and then nothing. well, we understand this, this is the hand of the one who needs an arm and a leg, so they show the people sitting watching and, uh, so to speak, he was now kissing in this regard. well, it was necessary to accept to throw in this story during the presidential campaign. we showed. well in fact, trump would have won if it weren’t for those falsifications, about which now even a special film was made about 2,000 mules who founded there and carried ballots, but another important topic that we raise many times here is that without waiting end of the special military operation. it is necessary to adopt all those laws that had to be

introduced a long time ago. ok then. well, you launched, the most important is actually a flash mob. uh, with a question to all people in important positions, making key decisions. let everyone speak about the attitude to svo, and i received an answer already i deputies. uh, the local dumas of yekaterinburg require my leadership to rein me in so that i don’t dare questions about their relationship to putin’s policy and to theirs. they dare not tell solovyov. oh, you solovyova, now we have a huge battle on this score. you there, who considers yourself unknown, tell me how you feel about the special operation that you are hiding in the wall of the yeltsin center? and? well, come out into the light, god, which of you was in the donbass which of you and what did you do to win? clever people because there are a huge number of sayings on this score, but if you make a boil, the avka is on fire. as a matter of fact, but we have stars. the so-called there,

but in culture, media officials in different positions and a huge number of silent ones, who correctly they sit out, someone wants to lie down until the new year, so to speak, and return. actually, they leave. these are the deputies. there are some other regional officials, but why can't they all be forced. if you are in a government job public office. you must decide. if something makes you feel uncomfortable in this situation, but leave. then let the social workers work and wait for you in the settings of the national economy, then they wrote vladimirovich. why are everyone sent to us all the time? we are fine, but still. this is the first moment. he is waiting for you, and even now london is not adopting laws about this. well, the salon is waiting. the darkness of artists who have already proven themselves from an understandable point of view and they have a concept, the same galkin on

in august, there are some concerts on the poster, but our legislation is so imperfect. i talked to the promoters there. they can’t even terminate the contract with them within the framework of the current legislation, because, well, how can there not be such a thing, such an article is another frightened patriot. well, we don’t even have an article, so to speak, for some direct or indirect there. that's treason to the motherland or international, it sounds like it's scarier, no matter how you scare the nets from them. it is necessary to call a spade a spade. well i'm trying soften, but nevertheless it turns out that even if you are the owner of the site there, the announcer, you cannot put this conditional galkin out in the cold because we have such laws. you cannot, according to the labor code, if an enemy works in your organization, and he wants the defeat of russia there in social networks, all sorts of things, so to speak, carr of heaven. you don't have that. you have to come up with options for him there, so to speak, shortening the agreement of the parties. the enemy is on fire, i

kindly ask you to leave, but why can't the labor code be changed? why not another legislation and other our all, uh, means to bring our acts in line with the mobilization nature of the situation in which we find ourselves, we are working through, now we recalled. yes, great, what will happen? well, if you've started to shed, let's keep asking. i conclude, i want to say, starting from the rumor of

khinshtein, who yes, after the story with this courageous alexander from riga, suggested giving citizenship according to a simplified scheme, but nonetheless. why is it impossible, in principle, at the state level to officially recognize, let's say latvia to give it the status of a state dangerous for the russians, well, or some such wording, and on the basis of this, well, it’s really already to carry out total sanctions against them. why are we not responding? well, in those issues where the decks are already obvious from latvia and estonia, who tried to throw our journalists and satellite into prison there. i mean , there are a lot of questions like that. we are asking in this studio. that is, what needs to happen. in the world there, in relation to us, in relation to our people, there must be a realization in the elites that the situation on february 23 will never return. based on this, it is necessary to understand, that's just what everything is back of the road. no, the reverse speed does not turn on, no matter how someone would like. i'll rephrase your correct question then. that is,

that we need sanctions. that's what we need the goal of total sanctions in protecting our interests, well , punish, well, so that they don't exist, as it is still direct. so, well, they will throw journalists there, but before that they threw our journalists in prison. they closed the thugs of our media there, and, well, estonia she is an estonian citizen, but she didn’t violate anything, you just auto-work on the russian media, a criminal case is sitting, so to speak now in latvia. i understand the deputy of europe, yana zhdanok, 72 years old, where the indignation of all hrcs, we hrcs are european structures. it should be disrespectful, you understand, well, how else are you, and we are not talking about weapons here and we do not threaten with missiles, then they must suffer economically, and it turns out that way. they are all like that. come on , we are now russia there, but looked nothing happened. then. come on, there's more. well, such why are we surprised, then we are in vain what you are trying to convince me of, because a person who is not against

missiles under certain conditions, but it is simply necessary, when you take sanctions to take to know why i said that there are now those who oppose me i'll finish it, and then i'll return it to you. well, we also raised this from the last time, if a person went to hell from russia spits at us from there, yes, yes, we cannot decide his citizenship under the constitution, but why can’t we pass a law then on confiscation property that they did in the same ukraine well, why? yes, we can’t even confiscate ukrainian property, what are we talking about. we're even the property of fucking gordon and the fucking green that's in the russian federation. we do n't even freeze what's yet to happen, for us to say no, you have to bang your fist on the table. they seize the property of our banks. we are nothing , we are like that, well, but the dpr of the lpr, the truth is also the answer. no, we don't take anything. they just steal our money. yes, there are billions, and we, too, are nothing.

say what a nuisance. well, if anything, we can answer. consider it is not necessary to know when and how unconditionally, but it is also necessary to beat in the same way so that the enemy does not rise later. and so it's pinching in pieces. well, sometimes now the europeans have imposed sanctions against us, who is worse off. while they are suffering. they are looking for some way around them. they blame each other for this, they have a disagreement. we are now leading the world, in general, well, by and large, the situation with food will be critical to impose sanctions, for example, energy is necessary on the eve of winter. not pumping much now, but the sanctions have already been introduced in part so that we will not be able to pump gazprom into their own storage facilities against these sanctions have been introduced against this, where they will now look for gas, why activate something? everything must be done on time, because

now, of course, it all offends me now it offended me when the bronze soldier was removed there in 2007, right? well, the point is that one could, of course, be indignant at imposing some kind of sanctions, but then we were completely dependent on transit. our desks were not ready. first, we prepared the port, and then moved it there, and belarus, by the way, also moved its products. we didn't shoot ourselves in the foot, and they were left empty-handed. well, you can't build a port in one day. therefore, to impose sanctions, you can resort to more stringent measures. know why and when you impose sanctions. what is the main goal? the goal is very simple, they have us offset. uh insist on change and regimes and we he our sanctions can cause political cataclysms inside european states. this is what i understand, the goal that these cataclysms dare the current ruling

regime. this is what i understand, some other people will come with whom it will be possible to work this goal in a different way, it is fully justified. it has real results. what modes do you like more, and i don’t like any of them. who do you want to put? this is, by the way, an interesting question. it was necessary to prepare to prepare prepared to choose, but for now you know, ard will go. in germany, because it will be an even bigger mess. i, for example, supporter of kamal harris in the united states because it's a mess right now and there's going to be more. if if she comes to replace biden, why don't you like it? kamala karris, with this we will show you her. here you asked kamal there we will work together and continue to work together to solve these challenges and work together on the basis of new norms, rules and agreements

to work together to unite global efforts. thank you all this is an urgent matter of acquisition for us all to know that we will to work together. you understand this very well, this is the president. genes connected with croco in that in the sense that now there are different groups in the american establishment. in principle, we agree that a person occupies the central position of the president is a person who, in general, is necessary, with whom he is connected, when kamala comes, it will generally be an empty place. i