and they are already dividing the territories there, how it will be russia will disintegrate, of course, so to speak, it is there, i say, belarus is generally there. so to say, most likely, she is going to poland in its entirety, or to do some part there, regardless of this , that is, it’s clear, there are plans, as

they say. eh, napoleonic, or rather napoleon a , will end up as a prisoner, yes, yes, but for this it is necessary. well, for this you need to organize, and in my opinion. as they say, here's what about what uh, what we are talking about here and now and now about what, well, we need make some fundamental decisions make a decision because indeed the situation is such that i am absolutely sure that we will win this fight, i am absolutely sure of it, but the fight will be hard, we will win simply because we have no other choice now, unlike from them they have a way out. still, there is some. but we don’t have any, so you need to understand the scale in general. e. tap dramas and this, which are happening before our eyes, are already here, as they say, the laws of marx, they no longer work.

there is already something from nietzsche and already close to freud the psychoanalysts have begun because of it, therefore, here we already have to do everything in a serious way, well, with supporters, no, that we are used to deal with it extremely harshly and now we will figure it out, too, western superhumans have turned up for me. to squeal here yesterday's eurovision in this regard, of course, at night you look at it all and think. all of them yes, joyfully for the nazis , it means to think about it and at that moment a supporter of the same nazi idea flies on you in america, with the same symbols they kill people, as they are now, but in no way, as usual, they will pretend that everything is fine. it just happened to be an ad.

my stoltenberg happily declares here that they will help. yes, that turkey, like, has nothing against the entry of finland and sweden, that is, stoltenberg. now for erdogan, he says, he also says in russia everything did not go according to plan, he says. so that russia is retreating from kharkov without seeing, in general, in fact, what is happening on the battlefield? well, i think our ministry of defense will answer, when the time comes, clearly and understandably. well it just shows how much they keep track of everything that happens. and that in direct nato they are at war with russia, they can simply tell us already, you hear directly. here we see you and all of you are our goals. no

, well, it's clear that schultz didn't have liverwurst there, because he allowed himself to. he said he wasn't a liverwurst. well, melnik is nervous, so he called him liverwurst, he's not liverwurst . krakow krakow ham. i don’t know, whatever, i can already say directly that not taking calls from these people is not about what to do with them talk. i'm generally tougher time. we must understand that they are fighting with us in hell, so we must declare war on everything. and read, proceeding from this, legitimate purposes are not only what is on the territory of ukraine every time i say so to me then they call, they say, listen, well, do not scare me. why not scare something? maybe it's time to get tougher sergey alexandrovich well, about the tougher thing, right? here, of course, you also need to find a middle ground, but nevertheless, you need to understand a simple thing, and it seems to me, just to say so, well obvious, if they do not see the possible consequences for themselves, they have nothing to fear, there is simply nothing, that is, roughly speaking, if you understand

that nothing will happen to you, then your hands are untied for any geopolitical experiments, then for you. this is simply taken out of your, so to speak, comfortable stay of the situation. and in this situation, anything can happen. let everything happen there. if we are americans, we are europeans, that is, when there is nothing to be afraid of a nuclear strike, we do not need to be afraid, because russia will not dare to sanction a response to this, there is no need to be afraid, because russia does not dare to do this, which, by the way, suggests that there is a significant lobby within the russian leadership that does not allow this to be done. so, you can play with this lobby in the future yes, as it were uh, then there is nothing to be afraid of at all. as for being afraid, there is nothing and no one to be afraid of, so we can do whatever we want, so i would like to respond to the discussion here about sanctions. i agree sanctions are needed by the time good spoon for dinner everything is needed, so to speak. e verified golden mean necessary plans and so on, but there are several factors, the first and this is public opinion. here we talk a lot about the fact that one of the main, so to speak, guarantees of our success is the consolidation of society in this society. we need to periodically report something and we need to

show that we can do something, we must understand this society. e that in fact there are grounds for consolidation. to do this, something needs to be done, but to tell the society, and this telling is not power. but we are with you, yes, in fact, there are some - we have such plans, so to speak, but we will not tell you about them. this is a losing position. we recently discussed on may 9, talking about what to say, that this is a huge mandate of trust, a mandate of trust. it is not eternal, and it must be based on something. it needs to be worked out somehow, so public opinion, on which the consolidation of the country depends, on which success depends, is extremely important in the current situation, so some obvious sometimes, perhaps, bright steps, it is necessary to demonstrate, and to tell what you know, we will later someday, when it will be winter. we 'll do this, and then winter will come. we won't do it. yes, this is the first thing to say, yes, that is, here you need to understand that yes, of course, everything needs to be prepared and that's it, so to speak. well, now he has prepared for the moment, but nevertheless. there are people called the people of russia with whom you also need to communicate, and

so on, and simply rely on their inner, what is called immanently, inherent patriotism, which supposedly will never end would be, to put it mildly , naive, the second, what i have already said, when we do not show these teeth. west, he has a completely simple opinion. it means taking some serious steps towards. the west is not capable of russia, but within the russian leadership. there is a certain lobby that will slow down to the last and which, as i said, believes that its survival of this lobby is tantamount to betrayal. well , somehow it will help, we can work with him. yes, maybe it's not, although i think it is. so in fact, but even suppose that this is not so. there is no such lobby at all, but when you do not demonstrate understandable steps, our opponents, so to speak, have such a conviction that it exists. it is necessary to find it, update it and work through it and the third. if you declare something, it must be done otherwise no one will be inside or outside. uh, means to trust your words and take them seriously,

so yes, of course, regarding counteraction. of course they are needed at the right time in the right place. but when they simply do not exist, and we here, people who are also not empowered, tell what you know, they can say so. well, in general time, yes, it doesn't know anything, consider that it is may adopted by the people to see, nor the decree that passed the result. here, in fact, the result comes, then at first it happens right away, sometimes they decided to take a monument. the european commission, yes, we need bright pr, which will actually give people a feeling, so to speak, of strength. it is important to represent in our information time. this it is important to tell those that we have such a thing here, so to speak, e is coming. uh, behind-the-scenes judo. like how we will win, but maybe you won't see this a little. that is, i understand what to say. everything, it is necessary. yes, as it were, indeed, and calculations, and it is not at all necessary to devote everyone to your plans, but

nonetheless. it is necessary here to choose the golden mean, which will be most effective. she will work. yes, as far as the economy is concerned, the same thing, as it were, yes. you know, with a small supporter, so to speak, of socialism and not at all a supporter of communism, but, nevertheless, really the economy, at least more state participation is needed, because there are critically important things, so to speak, that will not be done without the participation of the state, when we constantly say no. rain is also a question even again when we constantly say no. it doesn't suit us. we will be based on market principles and solve problems based on the principles, so to speak , the question arises, but if you have not solved these problems in 30 years, where is the hope that you will solve them in a year in a year in 34 we then explain to us, what is, so to speak, your brilliant strategy, if for 30 years you have not been able to do this. how will you do it in 2-3 years, and we have no time to wait. so we allowed the parallel to import, while writing, so to speak, such a list of who is allowed and who is not allowed, maybe, on the contrary, we should have gone to write what is not allowed. and everything else. who what? maybe a visit there will sort it out or to the question, so to speak, about

launching our own production. here's us. uh, we found out a few critical moments. yes, about which we did not talk here. we don't have enough there. this is missing. there are only two ways in which we can, i.e., make up for this deficiency. the first is to buy where we didn’t buy before, but now we buy there relatively speaking, the same china and so on, maybe even violating everything, so to speak, the rules of the norm and so on, the second buying this bird is to copy. i don't see anything wrong with that. yes, but you don't have to try it. for this, by the way, and even abolish patent law do it de facto. and de jure, you can tell everyone that we have a patent right. we are for everything good for international standards. as it is periodically so to speak, we do it and it’s right it’s good, but who can give such a command, who can start such a process, even from the point of view of the same copying, a private entrepreneur will not undertake this if he does not understand, if he will to understand that he is responsible, that tomorrow they can press him and

twist his neck, he will not do this. especially will not invest huge money. he does not know what will happen to him; he cannot work in such conditions on these very conditions, and therefore it is pointless to blame him for this. this can only be done by the state and only by guaranteeing 100% certainty that everything will be provided for the whole process in a different way, there is no way to expect from a private entrepreneur that he will take risks, so to speak , . actually. in terms of one's own freedom in the end, let it be to take risks for the sake of the motherland to live, but there are, as it were, but they are a minority, well, large projects are their minority, in fact, as if waiting for it to somehow form by itself. this is stupidity. now most of the large entrepreneurs, to be honest, are sitting on such a change, because all their production for 30 years in a row was tied to external communications on payment systems. many are simply on a sense of patriotism. it vibrates like this because they don't know what's going to happen to them. here you need

the state may not be named. this is socialism. you can call it whatever you like, but in fact without the state. these things will not be done. all this is obvious. this is what i've been talking about here more than once , but it's not what i've said, there's no genius in it. set a task. and everything that allows you to perform this task, all this is suitable. what is it called capitalism socialism there is still some of it is not even. there's no value, but there are people who shouldn't be involved. they must be understood that they are guaranteed even let it be private capital. well, tell them. even if you're here will break the law. we clearly guarantee you that you will not have problems or change the law. that, in fact, is all. it won't work any other way. it won't work at all. that is, here you find alternative sources of supply, which means you can either arrange for yourself what you can or are trying to establish. for example, now there are a lot of things. you just need to directively give the command to try to copy if

she actually should go to development, there are 10-15 years, try to copy these things, nothing so terrible, so to speak. i honestly don't see it in the end. china has become china just didn’t invent anything like that. in fact, from what they are now than they are now filling up the world, they bought copied what they could copy copied because they could not copy it. that, in fact, is all. well , without the state. it's impossible to get by here. and by the way, here, if you look, so to speak, the ideological formula for the future here, of course , is simply its social justice and the achievement of its goals without e, more of its participation by the state of the economy. they still say so, two more important things are impossible. we were talking about russophobia here, as it were, yes, here it is on ob. well, so to speak, the statement of marovetsky is marovetsky when he said that russian measures are a cancerous tumor. so to speak, it should be removed and so forth, he simply expressed. uh, it was the quintessence, indeed the attitude of the west to to the russian people to all those who consider themselves russians and to the russian state project towards russia, uh, the quintessence of attitude. west is

hatred for russia, yes, maybe it's trite, but nonetheless. i want the russians to reach the russians and all those who consider themselves russians. really. in fact, everything that is happening today in ukraine is just an aggravation of our eternal struggle with the west, and the meaning of this struggle of the country of the west, the destruction of russians is such physical destruction, that is, the russians are here, if they stay here they must renounce what the russians were to me to renounce and become traitors. if you do not refuse, then you must be either dead or a slave? so, in no other way, this is exactly what we are talking about from the point of view of the west, and you don’t have to invent any of these same multi-colored pictures about the fact that well, they are just against putin, but they are just for democracy, it’s not true. here marovetsky clearly said, after all, what is the russian myth, after all. these are the historical realities of life habitats of russians, where they had the right. so to speak, to defend their interests, as it were, starting from the right of statehood, ending with the right to at least speak their own language. this is what

we are denied, this is what we are denied, you have no right to anything, start your own language, end up with your own state. and, by the way, when the project of the russian world, but at one time, how it began to develop here. uh, they slowed down, but they slowed him down, here, first of all, people sitting in high offices, some still are sitting. they themselves were afraid of this russian world. ah-ah-ah, after all, it's all, it may be unknown. what will end including here and abandoned him pushed him so to speak, yes, you know, you were looking for in a dusty corner. everything is on the sieve in economic ways. we will solve everything with economic methods. economic methods and approaches in the territory of the former soviet union have failed. let's be honest, and ukraine is the most striking example of this failure of a business approach, both to building the russian state and to solving problems for it means beyond its borders, it completely failed, because from the point of view of business, ukraine is much more profitable. in fact, it was to have a good relationship with russia and with the west, remaining between

them, but ukraine chose another for it, they chose another. she chose another does not matter. and when they actually began to bury the project here, the russian world did not think. and what will you do with the millions of russians who are outside the country. that is why, among other things, we have tens and hundreds of thousands of russians in ukraine the blood of people who feel they are not russian. and that's why they hate russia, that's why we have tens and hundreds of thousands of people here inside russia, for sure tens of people, including young people. being ethnic russians, but hating russia as soon as they left the universities because they were brought up there, they leave the universities. they don’t know how to do anything, they don’t know anything, they didn’t build anything, they didn’t create anything, they didn’t see anything, and russia no longer they no longer love, despite the surnames ivanov petrov, so to speak, and so on and etc. this is also important, so, as it were, besides money, there are things much deeper money will always be, you know, there will be no russia, there will be no russians, there will be no those who start, and there

will be money, so money is good, but money is a tool and even the last thing i wanted to say because uh about everything, the rest is great. let's say others about it, as it were, yes, they say little. now we are in ukraine in relation to the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, a process of direct destruction is taking place. now to say so, yes, apart from that they kill and beat, so to speak, the priests are selected by the parish. right now. they actually broke, or at least they break completely through the knee, so to speak, the pescopat of the ukrainian legal church, and a decision is being prepared according to which some kind of assembly will be assembled, not a cathedral, so to speak, church, but a certain council of bishops and laity, which will have to demand autocephaly, then there is complete independence, they did exactly the same in their time, when after the collapse of the soviet union patriarch filaret came denisenko, they assembled a cathedral of the laity in exactly the same way. and who are these laymen? we know it will be people from the sbu, it will be people from the nationalist community, so to speak, who will finally break through the knee, so to speak, the ukrainian orthodox church. as a result, we see a process in ukraine in

which they say that they are against the totalitarian past, but in fact they are reviving the most difficult ones. e forms of this past state. uh, claims full control of this church claims to make it absolutely manageable. so to speak, a toy that christianity will have nothing to do with christians in ukraine. i think it will end up with christianity not being there. this is the process of destruction of orthodox christianity. i think this should be understood, first they will replace christ with a nation with nationalism. then they will merge, this with others, so to speak with other schismatics. after all. it will be latinization and further complete disintegration, complete disintegration and in fact the transformation into an anti-christian sect is important more, why am i to all russians. eh, how should i put it this way, before that i said that the russian must understand, what is at stake. moreover, on your destruction and all those who are considered russians by all orthodox christians in ukraine, i must say it is about the destruction of christianity and orthodoxy in ukraine. as such, it is important for those who are ukrainian orthodox for those who

consider themselves here, i considered it important to read , because about everything else wonderful he said that others are very important plus tonight, in my opinion, a wooden church has already been burned down in the odessa region, and such facts are happening all over every day vandalism is taking place. but i also heard this information that is now trying to seize the ukrainian orthodox church. in continuation of what sergey said, the strongest campaign under the leadership of the united states is now going on all over the world in order for the orthodox church to exclude the russian orthodox church from the orthodox churches, which they recognize this pressure on the greek this pressure on all hierarchies in europe and in the united states that is russophobia. today it is already proceeding in the most natural and

basic way of the existence of the russian people in orthodoxy, to exclude the russian people from orthodoxy and to make orthodoxy without the russian people. and hostile to the russian people, this process is now headed by the americans. with help. it's much more dangerous and much more, uh, hostile, because it's not for me to explain what it means for the russian people to be excluded from the orthodox world, at least by officers. uh about what u you do not have a law, they canceled the prohibition article, and the ideology is correct, but it is in the constitution. they adopted a large number of amendments to the constitution

, in my opinion, more than a thousand were proposed by everyone, the problem is that this part is located in that part of the constitution , in order to change it, it is necessary to go through a complex procedure there. yes, there referendums of everything else is a difficult procedure, it is impossible to pass the time. it means the highest parliamentary bodies of the country. this is not capable procedural ability. yes, the time required for the amendments turned out to be significantly less than for the de facto rewriting of the constitution . i i do not give my assessments, my attitude to this is sorted out by dad. constitution and until they decide not to go out. in our country, according to the law, changes to the constitution in these parts are not enough for dads, and moms also just need to

do colossal work there, so do it. i suggested for this from the very beginning to write another constitution is still there you have elected people. chancellor of germany i don’t know, i’m good at sausage, i understand, liver, sausage, it’s the cheapest, so it’s the definition for it. that's right , the cheapest of the last remnants of meat is made liber sausage, not comparing with krakow. why is it more, and this is really, that is, the ukrainians have an absolutely clear definition of you are sausage, but the cheapest, but this is a german expression of a proverb. i'm

just what whether? ah, but the last remaining piece of meat is a booth, just sorry about the uk. it 's overkill too big. good weapon. sarmatian. uk doesn't need nuclear weapons at all. enough one or one and a half took on a multi-purpose submarine with zircomani and about 560 power plants in the uk in 10 minutes will cease to exist and the whole of great britain will return to the stone age in 10 minutes. nothing else is needed, no nuclear weapons, nothing in the stone age, she will be back in 10 minutes. what to do there with two

submarines with american missiles, these are trifles, this is also not necessary, that is, for the americans to spend nuclear weapons on the uk. ineffective why is rogozin a generous person, and rogozin is a generous person to him with fittings. there are more suitable targets not the uk, i say again. best of all, 40-50 power plants in one gulp, and still there is no country. and it's good. this is true and not only in relation to the uk to any country with nuclear weapons. it is only against you and nuclear weapons against civilian purposes. there are more effective means. glory. god is in the hands of russia. so i carefully read lavrov's speech, but it is

very interesting, very correctly , almost everyone made me happy. it was determined that russian foreign policy for a very long time sought a compromise. and in every conflict they tried to come to a compromise, it did not help. determines this did not lead to positive results. it can be assumed that if the foreign minister says that the policy of seeking compromises has not led us to a positive the results of the logical conclusion that it comes to an end further goal will not be to find a compromise, but to find a solution to polish compromises. if i understood correctly or, as i understand it, lavrov, she did not allow russia to really and sufficiently achieve

your state interests, and thank god the second thing that i liked was that he referred to the conclusion and to the assessments of people who are not in the world, primarily karagans. this means that they are serious about everything that is done in foreign policy, even people who are not. it 's very good and uh positive, but on the other sides. it seems to me that in your politics foreign policy pursued, and in recent years there was a chief consultant anesthetist. he said that none of your actions should cause pain or inconvenience in your area. here, so that they do not feel anything anesthesia. i hope that he will be fired and your foreign policy will be without

arrest. and in order for them to really feel that such a representative is like that, it is very necessary to find an anesthesiologist next to you and say everything is free. well, the fact is just yesterday your president spoke to the president of finland i was interested in what the president said, and the president of finland said an unexpected thing. and the words of the president of russia were unexpectedly not as harsh as i thought. that is, what the president of russia said turned out to be a pleasant surprise for him, he expected the worst. it seems to me that in this case, the courtesy of your president played such a thing. they take calculation as weakness. and i hope that he was afraid that the

president of russia, not understanding his tactics in this conversation to warn him what russia is doing if and this is not in putin's habits here, i hope that russia's actions in response to what finland has done is this vile ungrateful act. will make both the president of finland and the people in finland change their minds and come up with what tragic results will this bring to the finnish state?