on the example of afghanistan, we see that over the past four decades we have accumulated negative factors that contributed to the deterioration of the military-political and social economic situation. in this country. petya communications needs to be ready for various scenarios of the development of the situation on the southern borders, tajikistan, america and further actively. we have a father and an organization to contribute to ensuring overall security in the regions. thank you so much. now e dear colleagues ask permission to speak at the national first of all, i would like to thank vladimir vladimirovich putin putin for the organization. uh, the csto anniversary summit in moscow and for the warm welcome, of course, the anniversary of our organization is also a very good occasion to

sum up some results and discuss the prospects for the further development of our organization. uh, alexander grigoryevich, of course, uh, raised very important questions about the interaction between, uh, member countries of the csto. e, and. uh, the president of belarus touched. uh, i have to say quite problematic questions. but in general, it must be said that there are a lot of positive things in the history of tgp, because it is real. the dkb has been and will continue to be the most important factor in ensuring security and stability in the region. but as we already see today at the entire anniversary summit , we are discussing not only anniversary issues, because the situation in the csd's area of ​​responsibility is rather tense. i want to touch on

some of the issues that i spoke about, uh, the president of belarus, uh, about voting, uh, the countries of our members of our organization, of course same. eh, there is a problem. uh, often uh, our votes are not very synchronized, but it should be noted that this is not a new issue. and it's a long time. uh accompanies our organization and armenia repeatedly. she raised the issue. we have repeatedly discussed this issue in working order. i think it's obvious that this issue needs further discussion too. er, as regards interaction and mechanisms, general response and rapid response. this is also a very important issue

for armenia, because as you know in the past year, uh, just in these days, the troops of azerbaijan invaded the sovereign territory, and armenia and armenia turned, uh, codecape. e, in order to act on the mechanisms that are intended e in the regulation on the response procedure for the dcs to crisis situations of december 10, 2010, which was approved by the document by the collective security council, but unfortunately we can not say that the organization reacted as if, e- uh, as expected, the republic of armenia for a long time, we raised the issue of selling weapons, uh, from the csto member countries to an unfriendly country for armenia, which in the end

these weapons were used by anti-armenia and against the armenian people. and that 's also a problem and uh, to be honest, a reaction. e of the members, uh of the countries of the csto members during the 44-day angry war of 2020, uh and after the war, uh did not really please the republic of armenia in general, the armenian people, but i want to emphasize uh. the role of the russian federation personally, the president of the russian federation, vladimir vladimirovich putin, in the suspension of the war in nagorny karabakh and i want to once again confirm that armenia continues to be committed to the tripartite statements of november 9, 2020. i mean the

tripartite statement of the president of the republic of the president of the russian federation of azerbaijan and the prime minister of armenia, uh, tripartite statements on january 11 and november 26, 2021. well, i think that uh, all uh sum up, really very important good. uh, well, what about armenia? um, collective uh collective security treaty we are committed to uh, hmm uh further development of the organization and consider the organization a key factor for the stability and security of the eurasian region for the security of the republic of

armenia and in general, a positive mood, to fully e, support the organization and its further further development. e. and now i give the floor to the chairman general secretary. csto stanislav vasilyevich for everything to inform us about the documents that we are going to sign already. we are the chairman dear members from this security picture. i am first of all, i would like to express my gratitude to you for the meeting. uh, today's meeting dedicated to the anniversary of the accident 20 years before the international organization. it's not that much. over the years, we have traveled such a colossal path from the formation of the idea of

​​collective defense to an established international multidisciplinary organization, so we took the opportunity. i would like to congratulate you, dear heads of state, on your anniversary and thank you. hey, for your great work. uh, compared to the development of strengthening our organization, because without your constant support attention. uh, it would be all impossible on the table of your folders there is an analytical review of the activities of the accident for two years of its existence. uh, this review on the tone of calves was carried out on behalf of the president of the republic of tajikistan. by the way, the work on this review was very interesting and useful for us. here on the threshold of such big anniversaries. we tried. uh, well, look at the path taken to stop the current state of the accident and there was such a steady good feeling. we have something be proud of the successfully functioning mechanism for

coordinating foreign policy activities, within the framework of which a concentrated position of our states on topical issues of the regional and global agenda is being formed. although i agree that now it is clearly not enough. we must avoid answering consolidated answers to the most pressing questions. in our saudis, with international original organizations and specialized structures, it is preserved, which is very important , the principle of the priority of political and diplomatic means in achieving goals of the csto. and this is probably one of the main bonds of our organization over the years. we have significantly increased the power potential of the dcs to improve with the structure of equipment and the level of training of command and control bodies and the formation of a quarantine security system. an important achievement of the collective security treaty organization is the formation of a unified system for the flow of personnel, bodies, command and troops, of course, the highest form - this system is here, carried out by us annually on planned

basis of a comprehensive joint exercise. created and developed by wick chrysporte action modern challenge cargo illicit drug trafficking illegal migration of international terrorism crime with the use of information technology from this stage on a planned basis, joint operational and practical activities and special operations are carried out and the results of their means of their relevance and effectiveness are being completed the formation of collective tools in relation to biological safety. first this topic. today, i think that we will return to it, an important place is occupied by the system of crisis reference accidents, we it is probably natural that, taking into account the first political experience gained in kazakhstan as a neighbor of this system. here is today. we will also consider. eh means e. questions of perfection of the crisis system. the further development of our organization will now take into account your decisions and instructions, including gratitude for today's e, expressed, means desire and instructions. the plan for the

implementation of the csto collective security strategy until 2005, by the way, we will already next year we need to start preparing the initial data to develop a new dkb security picture strategy. for the next period 2026-2030. well, the time has come, and the situation now is significantly different than it was 5 years ago. it 's big too. uh, a lot of work, probably here. important here is the unification of the analytical component of our state, dear chairman, dear safety machine, for your consideration and signing two documents. pore ​​statement of the collective security council of the csto in connection with this summer of the collective security treaty and the twentieth anniversary of the organization of the treaty of security in violation of the awards of the agreement on

collective security of the participants in the peacekeeping operation of the accident on the territory of the republic of kazakhstan, it is provided for the presence of more distinguished participants in the deadly operation, six of our military personnel for the skillful leadership of the preparation and conduct of the operation are presented from birth with the badge of honor of the accident of the first and second degree, including the commander by our deadly group in kazakhstan recently, colonel serdyukova far nikolaevich and a number of military personnel for their active participation and the correct dedication on this operation is presented to the finding of the medal for the strengthening of collective security. the documents have passed the necessary approval procedures approved by the authorities and are ready for signing. you have to review and support these two documents. thank you for your attention, dear colleagues. i propose to move on to the procedure for signing those documents that were broadcast from the kremlin . it is

dedicated to the thirtieth anniversary of the signing of the treaty and on the occasion of the twentieth anniversary of the association itself, for the first time since november of the nineteenth year, the leaders of all six member states meet in person, the main topics of discussion will be the deepening of military cooperation and biological security issues, as well as countering new challenges and threats, opening the meeting. vladimir putin noted that the dkb plays a very important, stabilizing role in the post-soviet space and expressed the hope that its capabilities and influence will increase. i hope that the organization, which over the previous years has become a full-fledged the international structure will continue to develop , bearing in mind the difficult times, but uh, i would like to note in this regard that 1992 and 2002 were also difficult times. they never

end, but the organization plays a very important role in the post-soviet space, er, a stabilizing role. i hope that in this sense its possibilities and influence on the situation in our area of ​​responsibility will only increase. vladimir putin promised to inform the summit participants about special military operations noted that in ukraine there has long been rampant neo-nazism. what the collective west turns a blind eye to. i will especially emphasize the priority task of jointly protecting the memory of the escape in the great patriotic war from the feat of our peoples at the cost of huge and irreparable sacrifices, sleeping worlds. that's nazism. this is extremely important right now, when for the sake of countries. uh, europe is barbarously demolishing monuments to the heroes of the liberators, it is forbidden to lay flowers at

memorials, they cynically try to rewrite history in praise of murderers and traitors. unfortunately in neighboring with us in the country in ukraine has long been observed neo-nazism. what do some of our partners turn a blind eye to, and, therefore, actually encourage their activities. there is a so-called collective west, we are told, well, there are extremists everywhere, right? it's true, extremists. there are everywhere one way or another, they climb out from under the bullet and manifest themselves, but nowhere. i want to emphasize this nowhere at the state level is the nazis glorified. nowhere and nowhere in civilized countries are authorities encouraging thousands of non-nazi marches with torchlights with nazi symbols. unfortunately, this is happening in ukraine vladimir putin also commented on the prospects for the emergence of new

nato members according to him, the expansion of military infrastructure on the territory of these countries will cause a response from russia as for expansion, including through new members of the alliance finland sweden in russia would like to inform you dear colleagues? there are no problems with these states, and therefore, in this sense, there is a direct threat for us to expand due to these countries are not being created for russia, but the expansion of military infrastructure to this territory will certainly provoke our response. and what it will be we will look at, based on the threats that we will be created. that is, in general, the problem is created from scratch. well, we will respond accordingly. uh, among other things uh hmm that's besides this uh, endless expansionary policy. uh, everyone says the

atlantic alliance is also going beyond its geographic destination beyond. the euro-atlantic is trying to do everything. and to be more actively involved in and control international issues. uh, international security situations affect them and not in the best way. e in other regions of the world. this certainly requires additional attention on our part. and how is the internet at speed? what is it like? only with

us connect option. it is important for a large tech bank to stay face to face with a person in three minutes in two clicks on one call in order to justify your trust to support you, really, issuing loans every day, sovcombank is closer to people. think for a second. you have one value that cannot be taken away or blocked, and it remains with you even without money.

now the official representative of the russian ministry of foreign affairs maria zakharova maria vladimirovna is on direct line . hello. hello well, just now our channel broadcast a statement by the president at the summit of his dkb regarding the entry of e-e sweden finland accelerated entry into nato, the president noted that these decisions are very strange with russia will respond accordingly and expressed, in general, bewilderment with such actions of our, probably already former western partners, how would you comment on this? well, in this case, it seems to me that it is not entirely appropriate to comment on the president's statement, given that

i am a representative of the ministry of foreign affairs, that is, we have a common position, and here, obviously, there are several points that we have been talking about for a long time, this is even for me it seems that this was the term, in fact, will introduce political science discourse into a, like drawing in countries, who talked about their neutral status in the north atlantic alliance. here is this amazing combination of retraction of the alliance the alliance assumes , first of all, the voluntariness of the entry. the voluntariness of participation is an entry and, first of all, voluntariness is built, and always on the basis of an internal decision, which is formed both by the institutions of power in the relevant state, and on the basis of well, we call this desperation of the people, the interests of the people, the response of the people. to the corresponding proposal of politicians that we seen on the example of strange but european call

it what you want, who declared a special neutral status, who a resisted at a certain historical stage any attempts to be so to say, you know, some kind of such a part of some blocs, alliances, we saw how but this is their a position fundamentally formed and knowledge of history from the understanding of geopolitics and knowledge of geopolitics of the laws of geopolitics due to a. feeling the preferences of their people, this is their formed principled position, how it broke, but not at the expense, but of the elements normal international or bilateral relations, namely, by dragging our interests into the orbit, in practice and in fact, we saw this happen, it all happened contrary to both the national

interests and the will of the population of the people of these countries . institutions that did not belong, as if at the beginning they did not even actually support it at all, and then what to do, er, they were not associated with nato, but at the same time they developed common, as they called collective approaches to security policy issues and so on. that is, in the space of europe, which at first presented it as exclusively economic, then inclusively humanitarian, then with elements of politics, and then suddenly everyone was confronted with the fact that foreign policy, which includes various components of the economy, and the social sphere of security. suddenly they began to

cement and suddenly it turned out that the countries that were not going to. actually and they don't need to enter into them such blocks, but they are connected by hands and feet with some obligations, some solidarity. how else did it happen by imposing unilateral sanctions on these countries. this applies not only to our country in relation to our country, probably the most striking example, but also in relation to other aspects of international relations, that is, the imposition of intimidation through intimidation through elements of blackmail through elements of threats through, uh, various methods of pressure. politicians. and as you understand, sanctions concern not only the economy, but also the economy and politics. geopolitician all together, then endless exercises.

one way or another, which passed along a bilateral line, to which a certain enemy in the person of russia was imposed. although there were no grounds for this. but it was done so little by little. we reacted constantly we explained. all, well, not only not foresight, but the danger of such a path, we cited, both historical and modern examples of what this led to and can lead to and will lead to today, our position is clearly formed. she not only brought to these countries through bilateral channels. it has already been published. and maria vladimirovna i would like to ask you, here's another topic that the western government is actively discussing, of course, they want to shift the food problem, but on someone else's shoulders in order to relieve themselves of responsibility. they themselves impose sanctions, they

themselves print money in unimaginable quantities, and prices are rising and they need to find it. uh, someone to answer for this. they say scattering the blame. and how can we be here, how to explain to the world and whether it is necessary to explain something in order to show that it’s not in russia of course to explain, first of all, thank you for this question, because it’s a really relevant topic and thank you for the fact that your question already contains elements of the answer to it with you to explain, it is necessary to explain it is necessary not only uh, so to speak politological not only under the middle external political department. we will definitely do this, just like our embassies abroad, but we must answer with economic indicators with financial indicators on hand. here i am hmm to say, given that this topic is indeed every day, it is only gaining momentum, as indeed an element of western propaganda of the information war. i just, uh, took the facts, these are figures, including western sources. here

, let's see how interesting it turns out, according to stock exchange data. uh, annual sites, uh, the growth rate of wheat prices in the twenty-first year, attention in the twenty-first year, but amounted to up to 25% ah, by the way, many analysts in the west even increase this figure at times, but we let's take now stock indicators, that is, this indicates that the rise in food prices for the main segment of wheat. these growth rates were obvious to everyone and were already recorded in world statistics at the time of 21 years. this suggests that the problems with the world and food security began 2 years ago, there are a number of objective subjective reasons for this. well, first of all, this is certainly, of course, the consequences of the situation

caused by the coronavirus pandemic. do you remember the changed international logistics transport closing the frontiers of production, which many of them closed, and many, but added to their work requirements associated with uh, sleds. demological security is all, of course, reflected in the price in the final and in the structure itself, if we are talking about food security. here's just one more figure, but the cumulative value. i say again, these are world statistics. these are not some secret developments of ours - this is open information. it's just that no one enjoys me in the west, but now they will have to, because the total value of anti-crisis packages in the united states of america amounted to about five trillion dollars, and in the european union more than one trillion dollars.

japan has two trillion dollars. this is in the period from 20 to 21, we are talking about the volume of financial outflows, and into the economy in order to overcome the negative consequences of the coronavirus, and uh, there are no questions here, regarding the fact that i allegedly did not understand what was happening with food security, they understood very much and very much e funds, including financial in the first place were involved to overcome this crisis. there is another factor. these are, uh, these slogans that have already passed in a real company regarding what is needed, uh, to move the whole world towards a green economy in the energy sector. do you remember what uncalculated risks led to, poured out again and were reflected in energy prices. but it had the same effect on food

security, so the point is that when we hear from the west that just the last two months the last one. i mean , ah february, march, april, ah, 22 years . to changes in food security problems, this is a lie, as you correctly noted, an attempt to find the culprit for your miscalculations and not only for your miscalculations, but for the objective reality that took place over the course of 2 years, not two months. and, of course, the last thing, probably the craziest thing that has been done to the west, if it is so preoccupied with problems, and food in the world is the introduction of a sanctions package, and not a single one. i am i don't know how many there were. these are probably hundreds of thousands of sanctions measures that have been taken that are directly related to the

food situation. do i need to be reminded of the actions that the kiev regime is taking to block. well, for example, the ships of the corresponding e- ports. i think that everyone knows about this dramaturgy, everyone watches these shots, and all this is done, again. against the backdrop of repeated statements by the russian side about the opening and proposals to open humanitarian corridors in order to unblock the ships into which they could go and deliver food, and so on and so forth, therefore, this is a combination, and the facts should be communicated through all channels and at international platforms and through financial institutions, but through international economic organizations in order to put the climbing torn western figures in their place in their lies. do you still have time? i would like to ask you one

more question. we can talk and more than one question. i'm good, but a different topic, which is also extremely worries people. uh, this is the russophobia that has unfolded in europe, we talked a lot about this with you, including, but the last steps are the statement of the polish prime minister. this is the decision of the latvian authorities to demolish the monument to the liberators, it turns out that you know some very interesting section, that is, in fact, the baltic authorities of all western europe say that we are demolishing the monument to the liberator warrior. it means that we, as it were, are against the fact that then the soviet troops liberated us, after all, it turns out that way, so we we support hitler, as if they say, how would you comment on it. they don't kind of support hitler, they support the nazi ideology. it can have different incarnation of ideology.