it works comfortably and safely. well, now the money is gone fast payment system a new way of contactless payment for purchases 100 hours of sale of stores up to 50% if you think you have great offers, call the number one apartment or house of your dreams. hello. kirill vyshinsky is with you, and this is

a typical ukraine program. our program is not news, we record it in advance and go out on a weekly basis. we don't compete with news releases. we talk about what made ukraine the way we know it today and, of course, the peculiar path that little russia went through in the ussr before it ended up at the current point. that's what we're interested in, we hope that it's interesting for you, and that's what we'll talk about today. one country three orthodox churches ukrainian schism the church as a tool for creating a nation expert opinion metropolitan, sheptsky head of the uniates who glorify the pope of

rome approximately one percent of protestants and rome are catholics, but ukrainian orthodoxy is not united and the first efforts to split it began to be made more than 100 years ago. there is a canonical ukrainian orthodox church, which in the world is called the church of the moscow patriarchate. it arose after the transformation of the ukrainian exarchate of the russian orthodox church, which existed since 1921 , and is its self-governing part. it unites the largest number of parishes in ukraine , more than 12,000 and over 10,000 priests on various sociological issues, and its parishioners are more than 40% of orthodox ukrainians. in defiance of the ukrainian orthodox for more than 100 years, they tried to create their own national church. and the first

attempt was made after the february revolution of 917, in response to this, the synod of the russian orthodox church allowed preaching and teaching in parochial schools in ukrainian, nevertheless , 4 years later, on october 21, at the all-ukrainian council, the delegates proclaimed the formation of the ukrainian autonomous orthodox church, excommunicated from roc archpriest. vasily sticky , contrary to all the canons, was elected bishop of the new church, its main principles were autocephaly, catholicity and ukrainianization. in the thirties, the autonomous orthodox church was liquidated in ukraine and existed only in canada and the usa; it was restored in the ninetieth year, but another ukrainian church separate from the russian orthodox church was not widespread among believers. after the collapse of the ussr in the early nineties , a self-proclaimed economically unrecognized

ukrainian orthodox church church of the kiev patriarchate was created by the former chairman of the ukrainian orthodox church. metropolitan philaret has been a dozen soviet times for more than 20 years. he was the head of orthodoxy in ukraine. in 1992, for numerous violations of church rules, he was deprived of his rank and dismissed. filaret did not agree with the resignation and in june 1992 at the council announced the creation of the kiev patriarchate, the ukrainian orthodox church supported him in this by the then president of ukraine leonid kravchuk . banned in russia, they seized the vladimir cathedral and tried to storm the kiev-pechersk lavra, but the monks and parishioners of the moscow patriarchate defended it after the attack on the temples became a constant practice of the kiev patriarchate in 1997.

filaret was excommunicated from the church and betrayed anathel for raskunic activities. none of the two autocephalous churches of the orthodox church of the kyiv patriarchate were recognized as canonical orthodoxy and only the third attempt to create a national church and achieve its recognition was successful not so long ago in 2019 about this anna efimova ukraine on april 29, 2022, after easter, believers go around in a procession behind the carpathians with a prayer for peace in the country on the fourth day of the procession participants, they are met by an angry crowd of supporters of the dog, people, they throw eggs, they insult, they beat the woman lost consciousness after she the cross was pulled out of his hands and hit on the head with it. this is just one of the many episodes that clearly demonstrate the

methods of provocation in the struggle for the faith of the orthodox church of ukraine. here in these frames, for example, one can clearly see how some person deliberately throws himself under the wheels of the father’s car, and the crowd is already ready to crack down on the priest sitting behind the wheel of threats to the clergy of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate and their families, as well as the forcible seizure of churches. all this is not uncommon in ukraine for a long time. the orthodox church of ukraine behind these axes, or as it is also called the holy church, was proclaimed on december 15 , 2018. at the unification council in kiev, the status of autocephalous was received already at the beginning 2019, when constantinople provided her with the notorious thomas, this event fell just in time for poroshenko’s election campaign and was presented as a big victory for the president in his intention to go for a second term, however, then his opponent vladimir zelensky found weighty counterarguments, a feeling of suicide, as for thomas - this is a victory for ukraine, but it seems to me

that this victory is primarily of the philaret, who fought for the ukrainian church even before you became president in those hours when you were parishioner of the moscow patriarchate. patriarchan filaret in the world of mikhail denisenko, one can indeed be called the main fighter for the self-righteousness of the ukrainian church, but only in the case when it is headed by him, the patriarch of discord, the protege of the kgb repeatedly, who changed his shoes in the struggle for church power in may 1990 , filaret became a patriarch instead of a guardian. the roc vehemently condemned the schismatic tendencies in the western ukrainian dioceses and was sure that it would take the place of the deceased patriarch pimen so much so that even the patriarchal cockle ordered for himself, but at the bishops' council in moscow he was unexpectedly bypassed by the metropolitan, alexei of leningrad novgorod, who, you know , rose very quickly in the church hierarchy. uh, well, i see, with some help again.

uh, religious intelligence agencies get off kai and so on. that is, the person was in the service. and then suddenly some kind of tragedy will return. from kiev, after such a fiasco, filaret quickly moved away from his previous views, deciding to rely on independence, enlisting support of the kiev authorities and ukrainian nationalists. for this, in 1992, the bishops' council of the russian orthodox church decided to depose the metropolitan of san as a schismatic, filaret publicly repented and promised to quietly retire during the meeting. i told him to tell me that you cheat. he says, i give you the bishop's word has become. it is known that very soon, under the leadership of philaret and the established kiev patriarchate, a redistribution of the treasury and property of the canonical ukrainian orthodox church will begin. churches. there will be a confusion of the names of the uoc, from now on there will be two canonical moscow patriarchates and the unrecognized kiev will be captured.

they will try to take the vladimir cathedral by force and the main shrine to the kiev-pechersk lavra. however , the philaret did not succeed in completely concentrating power in his hands, the religious landscape was too diverse, in addition to the canonical ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate, the uniates and the ukrainian autocephalous church pulled the blanket over themselves. it seemed to create a single orthodox church. ukraine was supposed to solve the problem with the spiritual throwing of the square once and for all, but that was not the case. so he did not find a common language with e management. as a matter of fact, ok, well, he was promised the status of a patriarch, at least, even even here, but in fact, the orthodox church of ukraine did not receive the status of a patriarchy, that is, it is dependent on the patriarchate of constantinople, and to a greater extent than uh, opts is dependent on the patriarchy of moscow just a couple of months after fruitful work in the dog. filaret

organizes, in fact, a new schism among the raskolnikov, he is not satisfied with the leading role of his own closest henchman and epiphany, who took over different governments in his own hands, but according to the local council, the decision on liquidation is canceled, the ukrainian orthodox church of the kiev patriarchate, adopted at the request of the patriarch of constantinople bartholomew to me when the united orthodox church of ukraine the results of the council itself recognized as invalid. it is clear that money matters. he plays a much more important role in this case. than everyone else but uh sharp periods of political confrontation on the church right there uh, raises a shield. uh, hiding the main reason for the split, that is, finances, and the ideas of , uh, autocephaly, uh, and above all against moscow, the pro-western orientation of the patriarch of constantinople bartholomew and washington’s own hand from the schism that is brewing in world orthodoxy is also guessed in the personalities of the two exarchs

sent by the patriarchate to kiev from the usa and canada, both bishops, natives of western ukraine, decorated the flock of patriarch bartholomew in north america for the shoulders of the unian seminary of ivano-frankivsk and the catholic university of the usa this topic itself has very little to do with the interests of kiev and the interests of moscow in this case. this is the reason, most likely, this is the desire of the united states to create another hotbed of instability, namely to destroy the orthodox world, which embraces. well, here is a significant part of a very important strategic area, the path to the temple in the case of the orthodox church of ukraine is a road leading in any direction. the main thing is to go in the opposite direction from moscow when creating pso, the main characters. do not just outline the head climbed into an adventure. here, everyone pursued very specific goals, and mostly far from spiritual life, but close to the mundane, the ecumenical patriarchy, of course, was guided

, among other things, by the wishes of overseas patrons, but over the past time it has become completely. it is clear that not orthodox and even more so the church of this organization is not a dog, a purely political project aimed at notoriety. containment of russia is not a tool to fight the russian world moreover, anna efimova valeriy savelyev anastasia popova typical ukraine about why independent ukraine was not enough of one orthodox church. we will talk with our guest expert rostislav, we are looking for chairs. good afternoon. good afternoon, it seems that after every serious political crisis or transformation, that in the seventeenth year of the past these became, that in the ninety-first year of the last century, that already in this century after 2014, there is a need for their own version of orthodoxy, this is so and why this happens, since society was, and indeed,

ideologized, in general it feels an absolute disgust for any ideology, because for a very long time it lived in an ideologized state in the soviet union and one of the main ideas, just perestroika, everything was connected with it. it was the idea of ​​ideologization, as the emancipation of society. this means that it was difficult to impose a new ideology immediately there, a nationalist theme or a radical synthetic one, but at the same time it became. stop and actualized in orthodoxy, which received freedom and people deprived of another support fell, uh, into a situation of crisis. naturally, they moved to the church. this is always the case in a crisis in a war , people go to church, respectively. uh, in order to intercept these streams, it was necessary to create their own church. this means that this generation, which has come to the new one, would have been inspired that they are ukrainians. that is why it was necessary to create a ukrainian church. and it

almost happened. uh, that's because uh request for autocephaly, which filaret filed while still being a legitimate metropolitan of kiev and all i of ukraine, and even in the eighties. at the end of the eighties, at one time, almost all the archbishops and metropolitans of ukraine signed it, which means that these acting ones are not ofnufriia. eh, and only then, when filaret was uncommitted, it means that they began to withdraw their signatures, because it’s not that they refused autocephaly. they did not want to work with an anathema and he was the leader, and filaret refused to leave. uh, it means that thanks to this, the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate survived for a long time, which was very strong in such an aryan wing, but which, nevertheless, was forced

to rely on the moscow patriarchate, because the philorean created his own church. this is from my point of view. uh, there was a mistake by kravchuk, who simply went along with filaret's ambitions and, uh, decided that they were together, which means that the state apparatus plus an experienced intriguer. they will create a church and drag most of the parishes and believers to them. it didn’t work out, but uh, the upc of the moscow patriarchate had a feeling. a serious danger is the patsakian patriarchy, because the seizure of parishes immediately began, and under kravchuk, all this was actively supported, and so on, and they made much more steps towards moscow than they would like, because if we look at the charter. uh, so uh, oopsmp, then this is a completely independent church, well, everything is self-governing, which means, moreover, the holy synod of the russian orthodox church has no right to interfere in the matter of the option, and at the same time the primate e, the uoc np is a member of the holy synod of the roc, that

is, the uoc participates in the management of the roc and the roc participates in the management of the npc, it means, that is, it means such an extended autocephaly that one can only dream of. uh, that means, in fact, there is a purely fictitious confession from the fact that they are there in some kind of subordinate position. yes, on an autonomous basis, the main idea, uh, of the ukrainian authorities, which are now practically not hidden. it doesn't matter through an independent church. it will be the kyiv patriarchate, it will be. eh, how there they called her a kiss? yes, this will be the corner of the kc through its independent church to enter the bosom of catholicism. and by the way, there is a certain logic in this. because if we are all europeans here, then we must be completely europeans or protestants or catholics better than catholics, because the pope is not only hmm the primate of a particular church. he is also

the head of a single state. the vatican, that is, uh, the idea, actually, the national church is a step. e to catholicism. yes, this is a step. this is a step towards schism, orthodoxy schism orthodoxy always leads to the fact that schismatics go to the catholics, does this mean that the project that is currently in the verkhovna rada on the complete prohibition of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate. uh, about taking away all the property of the church. uh, lavra temples - this is a serious threat. orthodoxy in ukraine is another gift to us - this is georgian fools. so, because, as i said, there is a very serious autocephalous wing in the opts mp. it's there the most influential, and if there was no constant threat of destruction, then they would quite calmly cooperate with the ukrainian state in full, as this

state wants. uh, now the pressure is on them to escape. they can only again, migrating towards moscow, what the ukrainian leadership is now trying to do. this is another shot in the head, even a little, because it is now impossible to completely destroy orthodoxy in ukraine. if they didn't if they had done it, and quietly slowly waited until the transfer of the public consciousness, then they would have already calmly received the church they needed in these 30 years. and so they created four of them and they are all not quite theirs. thank you very much, since the end of the 16th century, there has been a greek catholic church alone in ukraine, the largest catholic church of the eastern rite in the world in terms of the number of parishioners and the number of parishes. it arose on the lands of the commonwealth at the end of the 16th century. after a

number of orthodox parishes declared their subordination to pope garik, catholics are often called uniates from the union of the union between the orthodox clergy and the head of the catholics, formalized in 1596. in brest, the conditions of the unia are the preservation of worship according to the eastern rite in church slavonic and the recognition of the dogmas of the western church, for example, he infallibility of the pope. in matters of faith and morality, orthodox priests were persuaded to go over to the understanding both by repressions and by promises of privileges. actually, the union of brest of the 16th century was the first attempt to split orthodoxy in ukrainian and belarusian lands. despite all the efforts to promote the unia on the right-bank ukraine, after more than 40 years in 1647 in the commonwealth, there were about 4,000 unyatsky and still more than 13.5 thousand orthodox parishes

in the kazakh environment, the transition to the unity was considered a betrayal of the faith of the ancestors against him introduced an open fight or went to the left bank of the dnieper under the rule of the russian tsar. as a result, greek catholicism was able to establish itself only in western ukraine in galina, the history of the greek catholic church in the 20th century was closely intertwined with the movement of ukrainian nationalists in the interwar years, the church collaborated with their political organization aun, and during world war ii, its chaplains served in the gatchina ss division for more than 40 years since 1901, metropolitan andrei shepky was the primate of the uniates about him in the story of olga mokhova in 2015, the year on the occasion of the 150th anniversary of the birth of andrey sheptytsky, president of ukraine petro poroshenko personally addressed the israeli national

memorial of catastrophe and heroism. yadvashem with a request to honor the metropolitan with the title of righteous peoples of the world. it is awarded to non-jews. those who saved the jews during the years of the nazi occupation, the request was denied for the umpteenth time since 1964, not according to myths. i believe that a very well-groomed figure, but very controversial, he is indeed such a specific, but very real character of the historical era, in which the population does not know which flag to raise ukrainian moses for some for others, an accomplice of nazism and the only inspirer of ukrainian nationalists, metropolitan andreev, a native of ancient kind of galician boyars and gentry. among his ancestors, both before the signing of the unia and after, were outstanding church figures, and the first written references refer to the environment of the founder of lvov, prince danila of galicia but by the beginning of the 20th century. this is a completely polluted and very wealthy aristocratic family, if the prophet could be said to be of ancient russian origin, then his mother, he has a

polish woman, a well-known polish writer, will consider me ukrainians, and ukrainians will interpret me as a pole. at the very beginning of his spiritual career , the pussy spike was aware of the duality of his position. however, duality was a distinctive feature of his entire later life by 1914, the beginning of the first world war. he is the metropolitan of galicia and the archbishop of lvov, when the russian army comes to golitsy, he writes a letter of greeting to nicholas ii, calling him the unifier of all russian lands, but as soon as the tsarist army retreats, he writes another message. he writes, and in the third emperor of the french, a note on measures against russian ukraine from russia, where he writes that the most important thing is the arthurship of the orthodox church from the russian church and almost nothing to the vatican. why not between the two world wars, the metropolitan of sheptytsky was briefly imprisoned in tsarist russia and was released by the provisional

government in 1939, when western ukraine became soviet, he lost his relatives, they were shot by the nkvd in the same year. he will complain to the vatican that there were too many jews with godless advice, the presence of which burdens life with this very phrase to him and cannot forgive your name on june 30, forty-one. he will not prevent the jewish pogrom in lev a the next day to turn to the ukrainian pasta. i salute the victorious german army and do the destruction of the eradication of bolshevism, which you have taken as your goal in this campaign. to your excellency, the gratitude of the entire christian world and again the ambiguity in the word to the ukrainian youth, he warned galicia that swept galicia before the second world war when the ukrainians fought against the polish authorities, and a month and a half before it began, he calls on the same youth to join the death battalions in 1942 during

in lvov, he writes a pastoral letter thou shalt not kill and here, in his residence, he disposes and renders every possible assistance to the officer of the battalion nastigal and german military intelligence . strictly speaking, ukrainian nationalism. well, uh, and of course, of course, what, and so to speak, what kind of righteous man of the world in 2020 is the vatican in the open archives p12 pope of rome from the thirty -ninth to fifty-eighth years published a letter from andrei sheptytsky. it is dated august 1942. in it, the ukrainian metropolitan calls the german government more diabolical than the bolshevik government and informs the renewal of the terror regime that it resumed talk about the possible recognition of sheptytsky as a righteous man of the peoples of the world, the initiators of this claim that during the holocaust he helped in saving at least 150 jews,

sheltering them on the monastic lands, sheptetsky saving the jews. he did not save the global jews. so this is a sore point. that is, today you host, showing signs of attention. you talk about the future of the country with people who exterminate jews. you encourage those who take part in jewish pogroms. and in doing so, you save the question. that's it. you save. he saved those whom he either knew or had a relationship with, that is, well, some kind of close hot blood. staying in a foreign land will bring you some benefit and benefit in the words of the metropolitan. andrey admonished the ukrainian youth before being sent to forced labor in germany, and in 1944, when the soviet troops liberated lvov, he thank stalin for joining the west of the ukrainian lands to ukraine and tolerance for the local church. he will condemn the nationalist movement, which he previously supported in every possible way and will have time to prepare education for the moon with a call to lay down their arms in a big way, normally the jesuit approach you need uh hmm save yours

there. uh, confessional political positions. you need to save. ah, that means authority among the local population. in the end, you need to save this population itself, you will write, to anyone and anything, andriy sheptytsky had tremendous authority in galicia and did a lot for the cultural enlightenment and spiritual enrichment of the inhabitants of western ukraine. valery savelyev typical, ukraine that's all we wanted to tell. kirill vyshinsky was with you today. good luck to you. hello, i'm already in crimea. they

always listen. always online people are so strong. wow , it won't break in the cold, we are watching the masterpieces of world documentary cinema. i discovered gagarin in a new way, he is a hero, a real hero. now we really miss the classics, new items, exclusives. watch for 15 years for free without registration. website in

moscow communication a lot of time for serious reflection when the west hacked the world economy leads to inflation and threatens russian allies, which of them said what and when to putin we will show the contents of lukashenka's suitcase for the first time why is it necessary jumping out of the presidential cars, and sometimes running to them even in high heels political program, discarding other people's boring standards will allow you to see more than others. yes. it 's true, we watch putin's moscow kremlin on sunday

at 22:00. the power of the bomb planted in the entrance was about 700 g of tnt in the zaporozhye region as a result of an assassination attempt, the mayor of enerhodar was wounded. in what condition is he?