here's before continuing. i just want one more time for the audience. remind me who biden is? well , listen for yourself. and yes, biden is a person who could well work in some news publishing house if he understood, after all, how iraq or iran are spelled correctly, someone thought when i called for sanctions against russia. what addition to nato australia japan will and support these sanctions? how scared? kim simply cannot convey this, he didn’t know this about his country for sure, how frightened, south korea also cannot be conveyed, because it is, because something like this happened, but he is not aware, but here it should be noted that biden is a person known not

only for reservations, but also rich in imagination, in particular in relation to his past. then he pushed such that even his hips said man but you feel. come on anyway, well listen one thought came to my mind when i was told that issue 72 was already here. i was appointed to the academy in 1965 by the senator i was running against. 1972 never planned like that. i was only 29 years old. when i ran, he was a great person, not because he wanted to be a football star. and you was the debate guy was

that it was over, the leading question, who was a good guy, was also a good guy. he said to all rybak i told you, yes, only one thing and he took my microphone. if you accepted my assignment to the scaloon academy, you would still have one year and 3 months of actual service. no problem right now. there is only little problem until the last word is a lie. that's just a lie. all because by the time jacob was supposed to be appointed, he had already completed a bachelor's degree in business. and if you graduate from a bachelor's degree, you can't get into the academy. they specifically took those who had no previous education in any biography, this is not there, it is not in any of the

documents, and it turned out that this is another fragment of their biography, which this man completely came up with another nuance that explains biden's passionate love zelensky they have in their biography page absolutely remarkably similar. just like zelensky went into hiding five times or four times from being drafted into the army, so biden had five or more deferrals to stay out of the vietnam war. so they are both dodgers. yesterday they buried two marxists and covered them in a fraternal way with kumach. one of them was a left-wing deviationist, the other, as it turned out, had nothing to do with it, but this is already from the soviet yes and the soviet past. so, by the way, the words are not popular there was a very famous person who wrote these words died recently. unfortunately in new york. well, that again builds such a complex chain and leads us to

yuzuleshkovsky, who really had a rich biography and biden, who invents his rich biography on the go. okay, he 's famous, but a serious publication directly calls for a coup d'état in russia although i call them serious buildings. actually. it is there that a bunch of such cretins write that, compared to them, canoes, for example. it's simple dividing man, means, if you don't know, we have the biggest businessmen. there, more than a dozen of the largest businessmen were killed along with their families. i went through the entire forbes list there, but i didn’t find it. and what else, what did you know, we have re-arrested big statesmen, at first the operation just sits. well, here we were told that surkov, too, was sitting here recently, margaritas, seen from the head of the day ago. oh yes, i heard about my close friend arkady vladimirovich dvorkovich that he was in

jail and i called him. he said no, it's like everything is fine, but westerners do not pay attention to such trifles. so the atlantic writes. until the empire of moscow is overthrown, the world will not be safe. all these publications substantiate the main goal of the west to weaken and break up russia from the inside, to fragment into parts, at the same time, analytical bases are being adjusted for the opinion of our country in the genocide, attributing to us the creation of mythical filtration camps, the forced resettlement of ukrainians and ukrainian children, who were rushed to learn the russian language, the destruction of ukrainian culture, while the west do it yourself they are doing everything to ensure that hostilities continue as long as possible in ukraine, although some come to their senses, especially after they open the refrigerator. this is very popular now, uh, the caricature in italy is quite cruel

and very, very accurately, you open the refrigerator, and there zelensky finishes eating the sausage. well, i conclude my introductory remarks. and it's amazing how the west accuses us of their sins. while, when you know, a simple question, more than a million refugees from ukraine came to russia only since the beginning let me remind you that before that, 3.5 million ukrainians were special for the operation; like no there are no. no, it turns out that it’s not enough to get to sochi. that is, that's why you have these guns already in sochi. yes, and vacationers are climbing into the crimea. when do you ask questions? and how many people do you need to escort one and a half million, and how do you imagine it? which camps where

they are on this speech there is a phrase that it turns out we deny the existence of the ukrainian people and ukrainian culture, so this is genocide. we have half of the ukrainian government. we have half of the ukrainian army. if we dig into each of us, if relatives or friends who live in ukraine, we deny ukrainian culture, which only flourished under the soviet union in full light. let me remind you that in the russian federation the ukrainian language is the state language, in particular in the crimea and no problems there, by the way, as well as the crimean tatar, which was not the state language when crimea was part of ukraine, that is, here are amazing lies and a transfer to us. but when he does not notice that i'm sorry, all ukrainian officials start talking down zelensky about the need for destruction. by the way , like westerners of russian culture, the pole declares the need to destroy the russian world a little

, the prime minister of poland it is stated that all rubbish must be killed. appears as podlyaks russians need to be castrated and the enumeration goes on, then, excuse me, of course, you remember the genocide, but, although you can’t admit it. what is really going on in this world? may i start with you? so stand beautifully, i have such a representative team today, and starting with you. that is why i often emphasize that you, well, firstly, you know tatarstan brilliantly from where for many years? get elected, and just one of the dividing lines that say that russia is colonizing them, in particular, tatarstan is written in this article they talk about the need to break into national apartments, and the second moment surprised me here when the offended leader sausage, also known as the russian genocide in the donbass, is a funny

person pretending to be chancellor schultz, this shame of the german nation, and for some reason, during a telephone conversation with president of the russian federation vladimir began to talk about the need to release the nazis of azov, i thought that, surprisingly, nothing has changed, the german chancellor demands the release of the nazis for gold. everything back to square one. i was interested in the chancellor. at the same time, out of habit, he yelled. there heil ukraine something like that or offended sausage, it's impossible now. you know, for our ears, the words that tatarstan is an example of some kind of colonization, it sounds monstrous. yes, we ca n’t understand, oh, what is at stake, how all sorts of historical associations arise

due to the fact that the german chancellor seriously demands from russia to release the nazis , outright nazis, and consider this as some kind of correct, probably, a signal from the west regarding russia, you know why? it seems to me that today there is such a shocking intellectual situation in western political science in western thinking at a high political level, they can not yet find any adequate answers to the situation that has now arisen in connection with, our actions, the conduct of a special military operation in ukraine. i'll take a little half step i remember back, uh, a recent delivery and a speech and

a reaction to it precisely in the western establishment. that is, well, the mildest thing is that he is an old senile. and why, after all, if you remove there, uh, the issues of territorial concessions, which he talks about, kisya, you’re the main message is different. he already uh, like a detail, and most importantly, he says that peace without normal communications with russia is impossible so in modern western thinking, this approach is those of kiser - this is the antinomy of pure reason. kant is wet fire. take it, take it, take it. it's simply impossible, on the contrary, their mentality today is a continuation. eh, you know such a collective dog, pavlova e. here the west is a collective dog. pavlova who is used to what it means, the more she gets rid of the fence. the more she barks and bites, the more meat. it turns out in this logic, they continue to

think, and therefore they continue to evaluate everything that happens. in this logic, hence the evolution from bushy senior's strategy relations between the collapsed soviet union and russia let's tolerate it, but we'll adapt it somehow to ourselves, we'll ruin the economic ones, we'll impose our values. we will take oil and gas from them, we will decide their military-strategic capabilities and we will do something so comfortable with each other in the post-soviet space, from the post-soviet space to the modern one. already logicians, er, denying this doctrine. burg was wrong boo- bush was wrong. it had to be achieved. it was necessary to finish off this damned russia in the ninety-first year, and today the logic there is a conditional biden strategy. johnson is a military victory over russia and the subsequent destruction of russia in general as a phenomenon. well, again, for this is already you for

us an antinomic mind, because we cannot imagine such a course of history by definition. i like that you are quoting our simple kaliningrad philosopher. yes, he was buried in the russian land in the russian land. yes, that's how it is. never left her, yes. so , i will now formulate one thesis that is unpleasant to me, like everyone else, present in the fact that such a pavlov's dog appeared, we are to blame ourselves, unfortunately. now, if we recall the entire twenty-five-year history, starting from the ninety- seventh year, to which it is now customary to refer, because then the fundamental documents were signed about russia, nato , the following was taking place the west was taking a step forward. and we beat the diplomatic drums. well, we behaved like that, we were supporters of international law. we said, so you can not violate the agreement. they boasted of doing the following step by step step by step 25 years of this movement and in

the answer is our polite guys, what can you do? yes? and it was said in different stands. this was said in different and very convincing. it would seem expressions. well, the last most striking one is you yourself at least understand what you are doing, yes, putin, if you are mistaken at the un general assembly well, this is already the fifteenth year. yes, yes, well, the process is ongoing, the process is ongoing, and here comes december. last year on december 15 , and we are rolling out our proposals to the west, and he perceives this with the old loike logic. here are those previous 25 years. ok then. well said, well in once again they were excited, but once again they showed their dissatisfaction with nothing in their heads in this regard does not change. and when we said what will follow if there is no answer, which, uh,

reformat our relationship, if there is not an adequate answer that suits us, that will give back. uh, for us there is already an understanding of what the world will be like if it does not follow, put something in the answers, and we said, if it does not follow, our military-technical answer will follow. that's even when we discussed all this after, and december we thought all the time. and what is it? and none of us can have mister kedmi. sometimes, in my opinion, he talked about it, sometimes vladimir rudolfovich well, out of habit, he’s dying there. and major yes, and we agreed. well, yes, maybe it will. and this is how it happened, few who waited, and now it seems to me that this whole construction, which you wish for 25 years, is in the minds of diplomats on the political map. the whole mind has broken down and today it requires a completely different look and search for a solution. i'm coming back here

jelly. this is such a political minority today. in the collective west is a puzzle. it seems to me that the global task is to ensure that in the end the kistinger and those who follow him become a political majority. i never get tired of repeating that our military operation in ukraine is, in a large universal sense, a tactical task, when we say that we are solving specific tasks there, genocification, demilitarization, protection of our fellow citizens, protection of the russian world. this is historically our land there our people live, who find, against whom the genocide, in which we are accused, is being carried out. of course, we will solve this problem, but in my opinion. the most important thing is that today on the territory of ukraine, as on a

large sheet of paper, a draft of a new global world of order is being written. and we have three main arguments for this project to be written the way we see it as an argument. the first is the unconditional military victory in our military operations in ukraine in a special operation. how is she this victory will look like? at what geographical boundary, by the way, this largely depends on the ukrainian leadership, which in my opinion. now he is plunging into a state of this, irritating not understanding what to do? there are many signals for this. and at that turn, where this capitulation will come, at that turn, the stages of fulfilling this task of ours will come. this is the first second on judging by the statements. the routes of these lines are somewhere in the 100unheji area. that is, you have to go there, because the feeling that england feels participant in an armed conflict. that is, it

will have to be about, as if me with a conditional reflection, with which i started something, the reflexes of this collective pavlov dog should change around the world, as svo is successful, but for this purpose, the stick should be harder, as in relation to any rabid dogs, right? and not only to beat. you know how often a dog gets angry at a stick, we need to look carefully. and who keeps the leash of this dog with him. this is also understandable. it is necessary to beat something device leash, second, the second, of course, the most sleepless argument will be , among other things, what you said, how it will end. well, in the near future, the so -called sanctions war against russia will be very winter in my opinion completely. it is clear how it will end and will be resolved by the fact that a collective west, a which is not used to experiencing very serious shocks. they will experience a completely different

mentality. we understand what it is to tighten our belts , we understand what difficulties are. what is e motherland fatherland of the fatherland in danger and for this now. about whom? talk about yourself, right. thank you. you are talking about yourself. you are talking about your friends, and you are talking about the people, yes, and we have the most powerful e, a layer of officials who are ready to tighten their belts with the people, but not yet vladimirovich, who has failed in import substitution, who continues to steal, who is not able to complete tasks, set by mishustin and do not even remember what instructions were given so far have not been shot. we have such a problem, too, i understand it perfectly, but this is just the one the case when the semitones are over. it won't work, any official who today gives even the slightest signal in this regard

will not work, he will definitely. well, not only will he lose his position, but these examples already exist. i'm afraid he'll lose something else this partition will happen. whether we like it or not, this deep-seated russian people. he will still force us to act in this direction. and i'm pretty sure that this attention, uh, the influence of the dollar, which is inevitable today, all these energy problems, what today also concerns food security. it will be such a colossal blow to this result of the sanctions war that you will definitely have to change something in your head.

it pours, it pours, it smokes, it melts. why do russians smile so little in the center of the brightest world , the blackest holes are born, but everything they do does not count. and why are the russians smiling so little trying to drown out. it has already been we repeat russians. why are you so little? are you smiling? are we smiling? when what is planned happens, when we meet with our soul mate, we smile, and at the end of each long winter we smile just a little bit, we through the ties a stalk rises to me. it is the earth that smiles, you stand on it, you feel, like strength from the feet. a face rises in my head and smiles itself when, where there

was only ice, cities appear, when our first goes into space, when the one who should reach victory reaches, and then returns and smiles.

well, the third third argument is the third our answer. we must not only preserve ours. this is more for andrey valeryevich, the advantage that the backlog that we have created in our military-strategic superiority in the west today, because it is a guarantee that they will not

commit fatal mistakes. today we have this advantage, they know about it. they know that today we are a corps ahead in this matter. this stops them, just from not realizing the task that i called after e biden and jackson, the destruction of russia by these. uh, so to speak, by force, because the victory in ukraine with all the support of this regime. they never hold. here are the three arguments. we should be presented in order for the kinchenra mentality to be rewarded in general in the heads of western politicians, and they realized that the map of the world would be different. i would agree to a third. point i have a nuance, because when we talk about strategic weapons, yes, and when we talk about conventional weapons, margarita sivna and i were there at one event talking with very professional people who tell us, can you imagine, there is a company manufactures

drones. ours are excellent, they work only for them one problem. they are shaken every day, by checking authorities, and every day they say that we have now been put in prison. he says guys. let us work for the front. we have to work, because the wild number of entrepreneurs who are now producing what is needed is under such pressure. here putin meets with titov, says the most important thing freedom of entrepreneurship. who should hear it, if it’s a nightmare even those who are directly related to the defense of us are mocked by these ukrainian warriors, your warriors, who say, but we hid, looked, here and there russians, uh, in a number of products imported electronics. how do you understand it? this is how to understand, i'm talking there with big people of the ministry of defense. they say that the military-industrial complex has shifted everything for us all the time. although, we are a reservoir of money. as much as you want. first, the fulfillment of all orders to the right and the rise in price. no, but now that time is over. everything

now should be dmitry fedorovich ustinov , who in his hands collects everything that is necessary for the army and simply organizes production day and night, using there belarusian experience, they have microelectronics. there is a matter and so that we have not declared from anyone, only one answer to this one. in general, the correct rhetorical question, which we all understand, that it’s probably, well, it’s very bad that it is, but, probably, it was necessary to put us all the country as a whole, russia, our people, the situation, or either this or that, in a different way, to realize getting rid of well, because you understand the terrible, let's be objective, and the military special military operation against ukraine ended a long time ago, that is, the entire military-industrial potential of ukraine was destroyed already palpable. yes, we are at war with nato weapons. we are fighting against nato weapons against nato, the military- industrial complex, that is, what it is, how it is supplied in what

volumes, of course, if you like it and for nato the opportunity to understand how their equipment works in real conditions of real opposition, we begin to understand their strengths and weaknesses to look for your answers, but the question is for us. that is, from what moment will we move on to completely different tracks, and with gigantic respect for people who are involved in both government and private sector there military-industrial complex. but that means a completely different level is needed. maybe there do not know the motivation for funding mutual coordination. not not, as i correctly said to the conclusions on one of the transfers, the question is nobody's fault. and now the most important question. what needs to be done so that these tasks are solved, that is, it is only about this. well, i personally just press to the patient on the callus, because returning to tatarstan, the work of me was like this at the beginning of the 2000s. i am active in the duma promoted the idea of ​​​​supporting that 334 completely our russian. flight, which was already put on the

wing then. so he didn’t fly, he flew, i don’t want another plane, i don’t want to say anything bad about this plane. he is a good plane. only today we are engaged in the fact that we are those 80% of its import, export components. yes, it means that we are importing and modifying our national component, the soviet union was able to solve the problems of working under sanctions not only with an infinite number of complex schemes. when it was impossible to calculate that ours that is not ours, but the fact that the state security committee had a directorate t of scientific and technical intelligence, which they brought everything they needed to find. i am sure that we still have specialists and know what to do? alexander mikhailovich what shall we do? well , i would support my colleague, but i would have one remark regarding colonization, if you look at the past years, and the west has not changed itself in any way. uh, cheap labor china, which today has

transformed into another country, cheap economy, cheap raw materials that didn’t work out only from us to many other countries, in fact , he continued to live in the same paradigm, as he always exploited everything that i considered mine and used for this i repeat. e economic mechanism in the form of a financial system that enslaved the whole world not only the dollar, but also the financial institute, but speaking about what is happening today in the world and speaking of a special military operation, agreeing that it really ended and it was the west that framed us with proxy hands ukraine and we are fighting the west, apparently from ukraine, but in fact in reality, he still demonstrates his fear of a direct conflict with us. and this fear is not political, it is apparently of an animal nature, but economically they are not afraid, and they are already openly declaring that the goal is the destruction of russia, including in the economy, and therefore i am returning here to my favorite topic, namely, what if we do not create the prerequisites

for the transition to a new economic model as soon as possible. it will be difficult for us to present ourselves in this struggle under the new economic model. i still i think the need to return to strategic planning. yes, we have a law adopted in 1914, federal law 172, but the law was adopted in many positive ways, but still it was adopted at a different time. it was adopted in those conditions that, although they were already changing, but this is not the situation as it is today, so we say that today based on the need for tragic planning. we need to stop arguing about what is the best private sector plan or one or the other both. gotta keep eating government tasks. scales. the whole country, the whole economy has state resources, but if the state sets a state task and allocates state resources for this. well, it means that he should determine the goals and objectives, and the institutions are also state-owned, and the mechanism, please, is the private sector. the private sector will never take on itself

not only the development of a state scale, but also tasks, but also their implementation without state support. therefore, we return to the topic of cheap loans without low collateral loans. interest rate, but enough to lower it in parts. but what we do is we fix the interest rate, then we subsidize half of this rate with state money. well, maybe we will immediately make a lower rate, maybe we will make sure that private capital is interested in this, we need to attract it. after all, if we understand today that we want to build a model in which profit will not be the goal, but the goal will be economic development. this is only the task of the state. i repeat with the involvement of private capital, which is simply mobile, more interesting, but give it an eye. i don't close unfortunate banks unfortunate businesses. let them live in their segment, but there are areas where the state. must

formulate a problem. we say we need to win, including in the military sphere, but how can we win without economic potential? how to win without the fact that today we cannot ensure the mobility of decision-making, we must understand today. i hope this is done by the government. i would support this idea but i would ask such a speed up. i really hope that we are developing an analogue of the digital state plan, where we understand what specific products are due to what? in what time frame should we produce and should not separate ministry give instructions on individual ministries. light everything together and see the whole picture the whole picture of our country and not save it today, but make the development task of the future have to come in strategic planning, which is definitely not only one three years, but beyond we have this situation will not change. we live in a different world. and once in the world, we must plan it too, therefore, the digital state plan, as a result, the digital ruble. possibly another currency. that is, we will connect our allies there. we must

definitely create an institution for development. well, here we are proposing to create a development fund economic development fund territorial development fund these are institutions that are incomparable , there is the industry development fund under the ministry of industry and trade. a wonderful institution, but today we we hear that the authorized capital of this fund has been increased by 20 billion rubles. well, that is 20 billion rubles. this is what we want to build in order to increase gdp by one percent, we need, uh, i was specifically interested in this proportion. china uh, the proportions are one to two. we are one in three or one in four must finance. and if we have a gdp of 130 trillion, then, accordingly, an increase of 1% gives us the need to finance the economy in the amount of 43 million rubles. so let's give this money more than that, where do we get it. why are we tied to currency earnings there is no longer currency earnings in the form in which it was, respectively. we have to make it so that rete-5. watch

the possibility of earmarked funding is colored. yes , whatever you like, but this is understandable funding under the control of the state. all institutions of control are there. the only thing that worries me is that currency regulation, which we considered as the most important institution for regulating and controlling the export of capital, is now subject to changes, not 80%, but 50% of foreign exchange earnings are sold. we open little by little windows for export of capital. why is it necessary to save the exchange rate is not important for the economy. e for the stability of this exchange rate, but give entrepreneurs a stable exchange rate that the state can influence on it more precisely during active time, and then both their partners and their partners will decide on their plans, therefore i fix the digital plan for the digital ruble, be sure to have large-scale institutions that can finance all this hmm all these projects, and they should be directly subordinate to the president and sure that the digital state plan is in the form of an institution. and should be

created within the government, reporting directly to the president from the digital death provided, this is your dream advertising. it’s not scary if i bother you with pleasure, my colleagues and i recalled that in 2001 the planes were already on the wing, yes, and i remember that in 2001 we had a wonderful messenger of our own. icq was called and we

didn’t need whatsaps and everything else at all. what do we use. now we had the only mail at that time, which was used by all mail.ru. we had our own social network developed beautiful at that time odnoklassniki a few years later, rutube was ahead of youtube in terms of audience and everything developed remarkably, until the decision-makers made a decision, which, unfortunately, still very often fall down when we talk with people responsible for the economy and other things sometimes prevail such decisions. what exactly everything should be marketable. this is bullshit, this is once again deceived us, not everything should be market-oriented, and they have those industries and those companies and those industries that are key to maintaining stability in society to influence geopolitics, including the whole real big medica, it has

never been a market at all. i'm not talking about such trifles that the bbc exists on taxes from citizens. yes, and this is a tax on tv, a person may not want to pay for the bbc and never watches the bbc. but if he has a tv, he pays a tax that goes entirely to the budget of the bbc in germany, exactly the same story with state television and moreover at the expense of these taxes are still contained separately such gendarmes who walk the streets, look into the windows and see if a person has a tv. and if he is, but the tax is not paid, then the person is facing very bad times. i'm not even talking about such trifles. i'm talking about that. an example of someone who demanded some kind of profit from twitter, while twitter developed for many, many years and was a completely unprofitable event with huge profits. in my opinion, only last year it began to bring some kind of profit from everyone else, but it was and is clear to everyone that we need this state

they say that elon elon musk is a private, all a private person, a private enterprise. but that's nonsense too. well, nonsense, we published an investigation many times that this entire empire exists at the expense of state grants aimed at certain and completely tasks , we were simply fooled, as we were fooled at one time, with freedom of speech. that this is good and wonderful and leads only to good results and did not tell us one little thing, then we are talking about freedom, and their words are not generally a word, in principle, a their word so fooled us with this market. of course, i do not call in any case to return to the times when we had to, as i did in my childhood in the eighties. we stand in line at the store at 4:00 in the morning, because two packs of oil were issued in one hand. and if here we are together with my mother or even three of my sister, then as many as six packs turned out for a month. yes, it also led to this, excessive overregulation and excessive state planning, but there is some kind of golden mean, i’m unthinkably offended for my industry for

medicine, which developed beautifully, but it was impossible to explain to anyone that friends, if you approach medicine, that is, to those processes that provide a stable country in general, as such, these are ways of communicating with people. these are ways of conveying any information, yes, to their own population. i'm not talking about the population there, if you treat this as a pot, as a business, you will have a very bad time, very sad. do you know what the name of the first nuclear explosive device was called, which was tested when there, in the forty-fifth year of some there 19, or something, august, you know how it is. it's me, just the irony of fate. it was called a gadget, directly officially it was a gadget, a gadget, you know, they have gadgets, but we don't have gadgets. we don't have our own nuclear explosive devices in our industry and no one still fully understands that this is actually a

disaster. you rightly say you need a digital ruble. we need digital planning. and what will happen to the digital ruble and digital planning if the internet is turned off tomorrow, they already are seriously discussing. they discuss it not in the light of whether it is possible to do it or not, of course, it is possible, but in the light of whether it is worth doing it or not? and so far, what converges to the fact that it’s not worth it, because their internet with us is like their military base with us. yes, they are through this their online function of foreign propaganda propaganda. not only spitting on all our laws, by the way, this surprises me not only some statesmen who have the feeling that youtube just cares and cherishes and breastfeeds. why volodya why because the hands are not ready, and why the hands are not ready was the order they shot anyone for the fact that the hands are not perfectly ready, and he had an audience no larger than youtube had years ago. well, youtube has

evolved. and iron no at all, stalin was. yes, when asked. and why they were made, he said, how could we not shoot you for this yesterday and the next day. it was such a task. what was the task, so that everything was according to the laws of the food business, and annual bonuses. and so on, how much is the investment, and how much is the profit of the meetings of the soviets shareholders and all these. we are talking about our country, about a country that costs exactly as much business as it costs to run into it. it was all before my eyes. why was the rutyug ruined? because to invest in rutube well , it's a colossal amount of money, it will never pay off, because there is a competitor like youtube with which well, it's impossible to compete with him. that's a lot to invest. but then we will lose profits, we will not bring them on the head, and there the shareholder will have more to say. how much money integrators paid to bribe a variety

of officials in a variety of, which the guys say. why give it to you? now we will put such blocks, such that it is there, you know how much we addressed the face. with the requirement and face and in our legislative bodies. wherever we didn’t write and go demanding to stop the pre-installation of youtube and other things on those gadgets that are sold in russia, we were told. no, it's impossible. it's impossible, but other people came into you and suddenly it became, perhaps, completely like this, a why wasn't it possible before. but i don't know, now i don't know, for example, i should have guessed well. it was impossible. what about a fighter? why was it impossible to land? but now he said, he suddenly no. but when he suddenly fled, it suddenly turned out and considered it being investigated, the multibillion-dollar property abroad was rewritten to close entrepreneurs. all of a sudden everything came out. with us , it’s always like this for a person to walk for 2 seconds and that’s

it. it becomes known about him, and at the moment when it was spoken about directly, no, what, well, don't. well, because these connections from the nineties, it’s like it’s not time for children to be a native little man. but it's not good here, it's good for me there. and here we worked together, and here we were together in the same party. and now, how here it all interferes, it all interferes, and both colleagues said before that that now other times have come. oh, how did they come, if the people are the same that became everything, right? well, the same and the same checkers. here you explain to me, we have been talking here for months for years about the fact that in america there is a deep state deep the state that actually runs the state and often this happens against the will, or at least the postulated decision of the presidents of america, as obama promised to close the gu for two consecutive terms. and by the way, i have no doubt that he would like to close it. i read i read

his first book, which he wrote when he was still 28 years old in hope audiocity and there he expresses quite an anti-imperialist opinion. yes, that is, it is clear that in his head something is not quite what came out in the end for 8 years of management. we are already silent about trump. we are talking about that there is a deep state. it's there for these e, pulling the ropes. well, listen, and we have something that our president has already said many times. well, how long will it take to plant a pre-trial detention center for economic crimes. give freedom to business. this is the only thing that will save us. only this will save us our prime minister. you and i know him well. he is generally with his own hands, he is from this environment. yes, if the president, at least ours from a different environment. well , he still understands how important it is, then the prime minister also uh with his own hands, what is called it touched everything and knows how it is done, and they all insist on it as a result. checks are growing, those put in a pre-trial detention center for

economic crimes are growing, there are no more places in the pre-trial detention center when the supreme court is sounding the alarm. ah ah ah. what are you doing? who controls who are these hidden deep people who make it all so contrary to the will of the president, contrary to the decision of the prime minister, contrary to common sense and contrary to tomorrow's survival of themselves in general. i just want to look at them. why is it so but this should stop all the same, if there is strategic planning in this sense, right? you can't give it away. apparently we can’t, which he simply said and decided by itself, returning after all to the main theme of all the last months. if you'll allow 2 more minutes. i believe that this is not all. in the ninety-seventh, ours began. here is the creep in this race, and it began in the sixty-second during the cuban missile crisis. why in america, as you know , presidential right and legal presidential

right, if the court made a decision like this on similar cases, all the following years will be made exactly the same decision. this is case law. mentally, it extends not only to the courts and to jurisprudence, well, it extends to them to the logic of their decision-making. here they are in the sixty-second saw that we are very fast. and in general, having still a large margin, they were frightened and crawled away, as later, in his memoirs, khrushchev himself, who alone, as we know, made this decision, i do not consult with anyone, as he recalled that yes, we lost, but because they gave up. yes, they didn't miss anything. did they say that they would not attack turkey in the kitchen , they removed their missiles from turkey, they removed their missiles from turkey a few months later, admitting that they were outdated and they had much cooler submarines, and they were simply not needed there. this is general mcnamara. he painted all this himself and so on, who at that time was the minister

of defense, but we yielded and they saw that in the situation of taran we were the first to yield. and what they suit. we are now in ukraine, they are us arrange this same ram. raising the stakes with endless. these howitzers arrived yesterday, what are they called there? yes, and a small expert, but i understand that these are those who can already reach far, they will soon arrive, but still, they are already further away than what was before. now now those who are already quite far away and already on our territory are being planned, and further and further and further they are testing us again, because on the examples of both the sixty-second and then already further than the ninety- first ninety-seventh and so on, they saw that we are fighting, when there is a direct war. yes , everyone knows about us and the great patriotic and other before that great patriotic 812 and so on, well, in such situations, when, it seems,

there is still no war, but it can happen. we are the first to give back. we've done it somewhere a few times, will we do it this time. i don't know the chance. no, well it seems to me, yes, that you just ca n't do it. that's all, we just can't if khrushchev yes task why are they going to tarangi? no, i know it. you know it, they don't know it. but no, they don't know why, because they live on precedents. she has, they have precedents, when we backfired more than once in critical uh circumstances, and they don’t understand yet that now is not the case, they just don’t understand, and so they raise the stakes. well, because there is no chance , we will simply cease to exist as a state. of course there is, so the task is not written in the curve. there is no chance to remove putin while there is putin , and they describe it. how to remove it. they demand the atlantic conspiracy in a straight line paints a few

scenario. i advise safety, that is, they constantly give on this topic. they demanded a conspiracy with all these sanctions long ago. actually, not yesterday. nothing before before, remember, there were still sanctions, and even before crimea , there were a lot of different sanctions regarding ku. magnitsky which in general, and what about the magnet? yes, there would be anything. they wanted what they wanted, for all these people they sanctioned to come and plot and throw the president down. one of those people who are usually called an oligarch. here is tigran all the time remembers. he talked to him, of course, i won’t give his last name. the result says that the washingtonium meets important people there a year ago, and they say, well, how is it? we ’re imposing such sanctions on you, but why can’t you come to putin and say, well, that’s it, the share stops and sits here saying, in general, you don’t understand anything in this country and you won’t understand anything. it's just that their face laughed, they go to

ram. and we have no choice. sasha permission from where we started let's get back to decolonization. you you know, who screams the loudest, the stock market is just those who are this thief and so that's why the term de colonization appeared, because de facto europe today is a colony of the united states of america, a new colony, like we were in the nineties the same colony. well, we managed to rebound thanks to our president and the decision he made, otherwise it would have been the same. and this is nothing new. they simply then wrapped such a beautiful wrapper, and they sold it to us under the guise of democracy. here is the freedom of speech, what they talked about and

different different other slogans the goal was you alone understand the goal alone will appropriate our resources will appropriate our natural wealth to divide russia into many small evil states, yes, which will all bask among themselves, but they showed us to yugoslavia how it is done, and that’s it. it didn’t work out, and therefore, this is anger, it is no longer restrained or hidden by anything, but for you and me, a special military operation. this is the first act, this is the introduction, because the war that is now going on we have discussed many times in the studio and said economic warfare, colleague's informational warfare, e is not only economic not only informational

today. the war is for faith. for the right of us as a people to believe what we want to believe to love who we want to love. and to live as our ancestors bequeathed to us, as we consider it necessary on earth by birthright. hello i'm already in the crimea the weather is wonderful 30 °, no one rushes to the most interesting place, when i tell them about what i feel, they listen, but do not hear. and that's bad . no one can rewrite our history. this only one of the folders prepared by the soviet accusations for the international military tribunal in nuremberg, no one will close the borders for us.

i will evaporate always together always online. the people are so strong. wow, frozen will not break, we are watching the masterpieces of the world documentary hero. we miss it so much right now. classics novelties exclusives 15 years for free without registration. or on the site

these wars are not the first. 19th century napoleon 20th century adolf louisich hitler and every time the whole of europe came,

now the same thing. remember that it started there also quietly, one company, the second company, the third company. and we really have no room for error. and it's very good that now it's coming. the realization that you need to stop lying. we must stop lying to ourselves, stop lying to the leader, stop lying to our own people, and be responsible for our words and actions. and to all of you, go forward towards the goal determined by the transitional commander-in-chief, just as our guys do in special military operations. why am i still sincerely convinced that there is a war for faith, because in russia it is an orthodox country. and by orthodoxy, i understand

christian orthodoxy, not a purely orthodox faith - this is when they live absolutely peacefully on our territory and build together, one state, all traditional religions, traditional islam , traditional buddhism, traditional judaism, orthodoxy, and all this becomes extremely intolerant to our colleagues. they say, we are destroying the ukrainian culture. what kind of culture, look at the devils who were dragged out of the basements, and found that they see tattoos on chest on the back baphomet. it's the demon of the underworld. that is, i can’t call this face a muzzle. unclean it manifests itself in this too.

holy scripture says what has been is and will be what to do is and will be done and not. nothing new under the 19th century sun came to paris ingredients in the 20th century. we came to berlin, we will come to a place where they are trying to enslave and humiliate us, it will not work one question, but before that i want to show you one small fragment, uh, i want to show the machine gunner in the zone of my marine, probably, but he is with a machine gun which is

the first marine brigade of the illustrious fleet, we are constantly threatened by the wunderwaffe, that is, at first it was 155 caliber. and now it's a chemist, what's it called? yes, what they are trying to deliver, but actually exists in nato. this is the kind of weapon that could bring a fundamental change and will not allow us to solve our tasks. no, they do not have such weapons. we have such a weapon, unlike them, but we use it. and for the most critical targets.

uh, you understand why they drag more and more long-range and, in their opinion, effective types of weapons, because our guys are included in special military operations, they continue to clean up the territory of ukraine from uh devils from these, pushing them further and further from the borders of the russian federation from donetsk from luhansk to kherson and they understand that sooner or later? everything will end like this, at least for the time being on the dnieper. they are dragging these systems here to force the ukrainians to shell our territory. how do they do it in absolutely defenseless villages on the territory, belgorodskaya, bryansk kursk region, why yes exactly in order to drag

out this conflict as much as possible, to drag out the fire of ukraine as much as possible, and they will never allow zelensky to sign any documents that he would be ready to sign, but he is not independent. we have a type of weapons that we will not yet demonstrate non-strategic statistical, that is, if we need to, we still have something to surprise us with. by the way, i looked. it seems to me that there is still a change going on right now. after all, they changed the age limit for the possibility of signing the first and second contract. i just why think it's important, but i talk to a lot of different people. that's who wants to go to war. these are guys. there are younger than me and my peers. well , because they know how to do a lot and clearly understand, and just many of them were worried that they did not have

such an opportunity, including by law, they want volunteers to volunteer, because , of course, the people support is enormous, plus we have young people not much, but our democratic pits we objectively have more people. there's an average age and adults. and we are still at google as we can , yesterday i told my colleagues during a pause, then the day before yesterday i returned from a working trip to the far east, i was in khabarovsk in komsomolsk-on-amur and looked. how the work is organized at the enterprises, uh, the defense of the industrial complex communicated with the people, you know, i returned full of enthusiasm. i saw how unanimously powerful here are the inhabitants of hmm quite remote areas support our president support a special military operation support everything what we do from one side to the other side. they work tirelessly. here at the same

komsomolsk aviation plant, where our most modern aviation systems are produced , including now work is underway on the production of a superjet, which already consists entirely of our russian components by almost 50% - this is young people working. and so i walked through the factory. i communicated with them. their eyes are on fire and they love what they do. they understand what their products are. will help protect our country, and they will their fate in their the future connects only with russia, so you and i can be calm. vladimir quote can be needed or how? let me guess? who said huh? our economists must put an end to this discrepancy between the old concepts and the new state of affairs in our country, replacing the

old concept with new ones corresponding to the new situation. we could tolerate this discrepancy up to a certain time, but now the time has come when we must finally liquidate. this is not a match. it can be anyone, stalin i i think the economic problems of socialization, but i 'll get back to it, but still i can't bowed down to tell me, really. uh, so they announced the culture of the abolition of russian culture and the soviet one. and in fact they are producing a culture of substitution. here's what you said to the wunderwaffe, look, they're trying to make zelensky a churchill, it doesn't work, well, they won't pull it, mariupol stalingrad well , listen, well, what a stalingrad and prokopenko radish, well, not a pavlus, let's be honest, but a linguist. and this is correct prodigy. that is, they have miracle weapon is constantly hoping that now we will win something here. and why are they talking right

now about the division of russia into colonialism, because , when they created a committee, the liberation of the peoples of russia in the fall of 1944, they are trying to create a conviction in the information war with this agenda that they will win, but if you are talking about the division of the enemy. right there, i'm so sure of victory. what well, let's think about how it is there, tatarstan chechnya how are we going to share it all there. this is such a decoy, a certain substitution, and but certainly we can reason about it absolutely agree that it did not appear today. they always assigned the role of a colony to russia, but they could not understand why they manage to break these russians? and we must think not only based on the conviction that we are right. and what methods to do it? by the way, this is stalin's business, why am i saying this? i want to congratulate you all. today is a holiday. we have may 29th. yes, check by the clock,

and the nuclear power plant declared this the day of the eurasian economic union, we approved the holiday symbolism once again gathered discussed. well , why does the twenty-ninth still have an agreement of the fourteenth year? but i want to say that in this situation, returning to stalin's quote, but russia cannot afford such passing summits, and belarus cannot, and everyone else, simply assemble that dkb themselves. themselves, the eu, as it were , did not work cool. the eurasian economic commission for its preparation in order for vladimir putin to share his views with his colleagues. on the course, including the special military operation, the president lukashenka again told the truth to the uterus, and that, well , they gathered, there, uh, the president of kyrgyzstan absolutely rightly made a claim that there is no freedom of movement of goods within the eurasian economic president. putin agreed, but these are not the ones that are needed at such a time. and exactly how much? this is already happening

70 years ago. i'm here with you vladimir path a little argued. that's all smersh yes, i'm a big liberal, just a thief. my program started in 1952 in moscow in april gathered at the moscow economic conference. i'll just remind you what the fifty-second year is. this is the height of the korean war. this is the height of the cold military demonization of the soviet union personally. stalin is a victorious soldier in europe. well, now they have already crossed all the boundaries. well then it was too. oh-oh-oh, be healthy and the soviet union is a counterbalance to the general agreement. tariffs and trade are a reptile, the so-called predecessor of you is gathering its meeting of 49 countries, by the way, the germans were most interested, and almost 700 there representatives sign 60 agreements, including 19 with the participation of the soviet union what are they actually talking about? freedom of trade on new grounds with

minimization of america's role on de-dalarization on the creation of preferential trade conditions for developing countries and that's it. this is done at the suggestion of the soviet union six months later, stalin writes. e work here, this very economic problem of socialism in the ussr, but, by the way, it also looked like a talk show. there he collected works in response to comrade sanina vendzher, notkin, alexander ilvich. that is, stalin argued. here we have you see, here it is liberal history, historiography has created such an idea, stalin e. here is such a blockhead sitting in the kremlin there whom to shoot in the fifty-second year, he only thinks of torturing, uh, even there exiling to camps. how to create a gulag stalin thinks how to create a free trade in the fifty-second year? stalin writes that it is necessary to revise marx's position and that some of the foundations of marx's political economy do not correspond to current conditions, and stalin did all this

in the 1952 year, because it became it is clear that it is impossible only by military means, this is one front. yes finally, atomic weapons appeared, it is impossible only ideologically, because you will not convince everyone, there will be people who will not believe , i will think. and where is your gesheft, but you also need to economically outplay the enemy. it's not here in '62. you probably started, but it started with the fact that the soviet officials at first six months later. after this meeting, they began to play up, then stalin died, and on other grounds, in fact, the soviet union began to build its own savings, then in the fifty-second year. stalin proposed the alter globalism model even then, in which you and the soviet union and, by the way, china played key roles. this moscow meeting brought china out of isolation. china has been under the most severe sanctions for the forty-ninth year proclaimed by the prc china no, it is not recognized. that

the so-called bamboo curtain was announced, then , as now, china was simply very weak, the two main opponents of the soviet union and china were the iron curtain and the bamboo curtain in order to isolate china makes a breakthrough and so on and enters the world economy, and since the fifty-third year, our then leaders decided to integrate into this world economy. they decided to build into an economy where they dictated the rules. you will remember one of the main concerns. here we are talking gentlemen, and in khrushchev's brezhnev era. what was one of the main concerns of the leaders of the economy when they were knocking out the fund and so on, the foreign exchange earnings for the currency were ready to do a lot, so now it seems to me that we should also one of the most important conditions for this victory of ours should be a new economy. it’s not just that we are now swallowing three in e you’re like a haircut caftan trishkin

caftan those problems we are trying to eliminate that have arisen over 30 years, but we need to propose a future program about every summit of the csto eaeu, cis you know uh, our president alexander grigorievich if the meeting it is not ready, it is not held, there is no meeting, if there are no different alternative opinions, the president of kyrgyzstan expressed specific claims. they should be immediately eliminated in wartime if they expressed claims to kazakhstan to kyrgyzstan regarding the vote. ah, in international organizations. this topic should not hang in the air at the level of the parliament of military diplomats. it must be constantly pedaled that's just in this way with concrete steps, and in the economy in the international arena in ideology. we can create this way of victory that everyone believes. beautiful i like the way you think

advertising. yakovlevich a small clarification not only in the kgb had such a unit, it was also in military intelligence and no less effective. so no need to run guys, they worked. in the sweat of his face and successfully. and not laying hands. everything you need to work well. don't make a no longer needed

discord. there was competition in the work of the outstanding bodies that stood and stand to protect our people , healthy competition, and all the results were in the face. uh, this one was talking about the problems of the economy. you were so traumatized. what is happening in russia did not understand anything like that capitalism is nothing socialism and what communism is, and now they operate with it absolutely without a clue, and i think, here. the basis of capitalism has also defined the pocket of arsens very simply, what is the meaning of capitalism profit once again. and you decided to build

your economy. pure capitalism is the main profit and what kind of capitalism do you think they call entrepreneurs? i am sometimes a rude person, rightly he is interested in profit. in production, the profit is the smallest in trading , the profit is larger in speculation, the profit is larger in profits on the stock exchange are even higher, and therefore this is how the economy is built instead of being productive, it is profitable, starting from inflated speculation on the stock exchange and ending with the production of the latter. and for trade, here are those who import, it is easier for them to earn, they earn more. because import works according to

the system, if you call it a bone in plus. that is, the price is plus, my profit is everything. is production different? and when you tried to build a military industry on the same base of yours, you still have relapses. why should he develop when can he buy and earn? and who gives you the task of developing capitalization will develop what is more profitable for him? and the army is not on the profits of work. these types of weapons, or these are types of products, or what margarita spoke about, the state needs them, and in the state, who decides they decide to farm them out, and that's how it turns out. and if the state has

inviolable. and you still have them. they are not touchable, this is how the nomenclature was. you now have a new nomenclature to touch. they cannot. they can be transferred from one place to another there now falling apart here. i remember how chubais bargained with the oligarchs. at what price to whom to sell communications invest this was still the beginning, hardly anyone remembers now, and i remember, it was my eyes. this is not my good one. i can do it by the head grabbed. what have we come to. here in russia during the crimean war, the failure of the crimean war was largely not only because of the government or because of the unsuccessful introduction? did not have. there were no guns, there were no

cartridges, because the same capitalists did not deliver, they took their money, they delivered, and the supplies stole, and the soldiers had nothing to fight near sevastopol in the 19th century. and when was the second time ? in the fifteenth year there were no shells, there were no people dying. and they counted money, there was no food, and there was no food in the army, everything that can be stolen. when there was no this great patriotic country on a different basis, you are now fighting, call it whatever you like. but at the same time, completely different laws operate here. it is impossible to conduct military operations in the country by straining, to one degree or another,

the defense of the country by its industry by methods, with which you built speculative capitalism, i don’t understand and this continues, but what kind of corruption do you have? and corruption is where it is only in the state apparatus. nowhere else can it be corruption, who takes a bribe an official. and what? and what level is she? lives and prospers i just don't want to, i can name officials who do n't take less than 50,000 dollars in cash for doing what they owe. he must do it. what kind of rogue are these us here not not not not here the colonel was taken by the colonel from him a billion, he bathed them like

scrooge mcduck fractured. note. this is only on our side and we gave 14-15 years. yes, now that’s how his last name was zakharchenko. they took the colonel from the budget of moldova, they separately bought apartments in which the money was, while they explained to the whole country that he was the only one who stole nothing from a criminal group . . can you imagine how many such corrupt officials colonel such their several such officials we have the legion this is your state apparatus from top to bottom, it seems they began to clean it, but let's see, they began to clean it with such methods. they will clean you up first. not not now. tell me, so politely, our country in this regard still does not want the

road is still far away. here. about cuba there and true or true, huh? at that time, the americans had enough forces for russia, they didn’t take it into account, they didn’t know. in the event of a nuclear conflict, approximately 20 american cities would be destroyed. well what will happen to city ​​when a rocket hits megaton it's clear that about 20 american cities would have been erased. the fleet that stood it would have been destroyed, because torpedoes with nuclear warheads were already aimed at these ships and it didn’t matter if they made a torpedo, there would be no fleet. it's all that could go, russia cathedral. god was to enter the soviet union, there was no more strength and calculation and strategy, but already not bad. i say that the victory of the americans was much greater and the calculation was

correct. the strategy was that in order to prevent an attack on the soviet union is enough force to deal an unbearable blow to american concepts and it worked, because even the destruction of one city was for the americans, then it was not tolerable. well, the strength to win, the united states was not in a nuclear war then.

accustomed to watching videos stopped working , install, open, watch russian channels and all series of movies and cartoons, educational programs and documentaries for free without registration.