and they shoot at you, but space doesn’t shoot, but intelligence data is given in real time on the ground, it resolves with all due respect to the intelligence officer, you need a weapon that this weapon will form into a living fire weapon. now, which is directly controlled by these, but not necessarily starlin can be destroyed more expensively, but let the satellite give it. yes , everything must be destroyed. in fact, alexander i looked, that's where it comes from and where did this terminology come from today, we speak there in e. the west says, here we will have to destroy. we have to push back year ninety-seven . hmm. i just remembered. e. quite recently we showed a video of these excerpts from german propaganda but on the life of german propaganda in the ninety-ninety-first year, when hans dietrich genscher. e. this is about the expansion of nato,

i showed it and you had it many times, and he says yes there. we agreed that there would be no expansion of nato, then he sort of goes back on his words. what happened and how did it all happen. and why is it all it changed when he said it. it was the ninety-first year, and in the ninety-second year, and in the month of april, the so-called doctrine appeared. wulf, after all, everything about which we almost completely forgot, we very rarely talk about it, and so, if we read this doctrine in the ulf, it accurately describes today's requirements. west in relation to russia. nothing has changed there. exactly the same, let's share. let's not allow it. uh, uh, the re-creation of some new powerful regional powers that we will uh to interfere and which may threaten us, we will not allow the development of new types of weapons, regional conflicts, and so on, when this doctrine appeared. wulf, after all, she was in general. this is very

ambiguous from the united states accepted, but then it was slightly corrected, but, in principle, the application of this doctrine led to the fact that the generalsher resigned. well, it's not just him. there were other reasons, but in particular , this was also a reason. why was the generalsher forced to resign, because in fact it is not corresponded with his plans with the plans of the german government, which, in principle, was thinking a little bit about something else and just a few days ago, and our chinese colleagues in one interview. i won't name it yet, but then i'll name a suitable time. our chinese colleagues, talking about that time and remembering that time. they so fragmentarily showed a piece of one document. well, there is this document this document is dated march 6, 1991 march 6, 1991 in bon, representatives of, uh, four countries of the leading nato countries to discuss the strategy

for developing the security of eastern europe and on this at this meeting. well, i will say this, there were representatives of the united states of america, great britain, and germany, of course, and france from germany, there was a state secretary. khrobok was such a stas secretary at the ministry of foreign affairs, who was responsible, among other things, dealt with issues, then nato and the development of nato, and this document is on two pages. uh, the document that was made up by the british, which then went directly to the oval office of the president of the united states of america and was kept under the heading secret in the british state archives a document on two pages, which, in principle, under the paragraphs there, in my opinion, 10 pounds, shows the main directions of development of the e-structure of the security system of eastern europe

as imagined it? these four countries, i note the soviet union, russia was not there. that is, there were only these representatives. here is mr. khroma who spoke there, including him. well, there, as it were, not a quote, but there is a link to and in this official document from the state hospital, and he said that we, in general, our line is such, which is the line, about which our minister of foreign affairs spoke , the line is very simple, if this line is expressed geographically, then the forces of nato and nato in general and in general all the structures of the defense alliance of the north atlantic alliance e should not cross the line along the border of the elbe river, this is the elbe that goes. well, here is the general, mr. comrade general, the colonel knows well, this dresden magdeburg, uh, hamburg is higher up there and goes from the czech republic, that is, not the oder, which is on the borders between germany and poland a along the border of the elbe. that is, this is approximately the middle of the then

still, well, eastern lands, probably germany, and he said, this is our line. we would like it all to remain, and oddly enough, everyone present agreed with him. that is, this is absolutely accurate. documentary confirmation that, at least, even at those negotiations where russia and russia did not yet exist. where else they did not invite the issue of not expanding nato to nizhnyaya, they understood that idiots and traitors were controlling from the outside. well, yes, who manage to worsen the offer in relation to what was at that time. it is obvious that all decisions to withdraw our troops from east germany are mediocre, absolutely carried out, and all these operations. well, when we took out all our bases and destroyed ours, this is a real betrayal. that is, they can choose whether they are degenerates or traitors to medium-range missiles. well, that is, what alexander says fully confirms this the west was ready for completely different conditions,

mediocre politics. these conditions have managed to worsen and still have not endured either a historical or a legal attitude to this issue. well , what happened? for this year it was e in march of the ninety-first year in april there was already a zatkrin. wulf after all, but a lot has happened during this time in russia has changed. right. as you say, vladimirovich, the authorities have changed, relations have changed. uh, god bless america, a completely different thing has appeared a feeling of completely different military principles, according to which russia was ready. this smell with the west, including with a united germany , i don't know if there has ever been in history. well , at least the state of the russian principalities, when they went to the ardu, there for the label someday. here is an even more shameful moment than yeltsin in congress with all his vile speech. he really said there, he really said the seven boyars. he

said god bless america and russia and the poles. are they there? have you arrived? of course not, no what are we talking about when invited. yes, that's right, of course, they came, but even then, at least this one was here, and this one went there. bless america to swear there and he said, lord this one.