the leadership, including more than once, presented the formula that all the peoples of palestine, regardless of their ethnic or religious affiliation, are under threat and have the right to choose their own form of government, but we will not go into depth. we can have relations with any country in the world. however, priority. we give back to those countries that are independent and carry out their policy of countries that recognize supremacy. third forces in the international arena. we are not interested. we also do not consider the united states as our partner in the same way as the united states cannot be partners. they are looking for servants, lackeys, any country that does not want to serve becomes an enemy for them from the american point of view, there are no friendly countries at all, and the past proves this. even those countries that used to help the united states saw that americans do not consider their independence, another a group of countries are countries that are close to us. in what way is today? it no longer accepts

unilateral dictatorial decisions. many say that democracy is in internal affairs. it 's good. but then we ask them, should be democracy in international relations? how is it that in domestic affairs dictatorship is bad, but in international matters dictatorship is good. this is the point of view of the americans, they consider themselves the beacons of democracy. however, we have doubts that you will truly fight for democracy. why then do you say in the international arena that we have money, the power of a bomb, a weapon, and we should rule the world. we do not agree with this. we are close countries that believe that all countries should take part in world governance. the current cabinet of the government is the thirteenth in a row, giving priority to building relations with neighbors, neighbors are paramount for us and the policy of the current government - this is demonstrated by the visit of our president. in

russia, it is indicative that we are close to russia in several areas in the first place. we are close in our approaches in our positions. the new russia wants multipolar international relations. this position is close to us, neither we nor new russia will tolerate unipolarities, and we will oppose the iranian people have been opposing this for 43 years opposing the american arrogance of american exceptionalism. we stand for equality for the equality of all countries of the world in the international arena. we believe that it will be better this way. russia our neighbor is a huge country. a powerful country with huge economic opportunities. and we can cooperate on many issues policies are good neighbors policies of development opportunities complement each other and link iran and russia we do business with russia as an independent country, the islamic republic of iran is also sovereign and will not join anyone's banners. however, we are in favor of relations between countries in the

new conditions, we managed to expand and strengthen our relations, which was in the interests of both the new russia and the islamic republic. it must be said , mr. ambassador, that economic superiority is in the american arguments about democracy. today, more and more countries around the world doubt iran and consistently holds. uh, the right to an independent policy and the right to make this choice for yourself and now russia adheres to the same position. what changes do you see in world politics in this regard. today, the international scene has already undergone significant changes since the collapse of the soviet union. americans celebrated victory after the fall of the ussr. they said that the liberal democratic order had won a crushing victory, some american thinkers. they even declared the end of history , they declared that the meaning of the concept of the end of history is in the victory of liberal democracy. it was stated that

the most advanced management model human society is a liberal democracy, and the main example of a liberal democratic state is the united states and they perceived the liberal democratic ideology as a prophecy, as a message that needs to be spread and implemented throughout the world. they believe that they are americans who have a divine right and they believed in it, as they believed in it and others believed, invading sudan, invading grenada, invading afghanistan, invading iraq , they said they wanted to spread the liberal democracy in the world. however, over time, american hypocrisy became apparent, committing the crime of killing people through anti-human acts. they brought terrorists to power in these countries, who were supported according to their logic. terrorism is not bad if terrorism is directed against the united states if the terrorists target other countries, then it’s not bad even the americans help them create

terrorist organizations, as donald trump admitted that we created isis by the americans, the previous president and his secretary of state. it was great recognition. this has led to the fact that now there is nothing left of the former america. and you see, this is according to the latest events of such hearings that have now taken place in the united states, and no one could imagine america weakened weakened in many directions in the nineties. they imagined the world as unipolar, that we americans alone were the force on the world stage. and now we see, when we are negotiating with various countries, that even middle-class countries do not accept american words and do not obey them. i believe that serious changes have already taken place in the international arena. and at the heart of these transformations lies the fact that the unipolar world is finally outdated today's world. today's world cannot be unipolar, it does not want to be unipolar, and the americans themselves already understand this. why do they consider china their main threat today,

because china is becoming stronger every day economically and the day when china becomes the first economy in the world is not over the horizon, so they seek to weaken, china why would the americans weaken russia because russia has a huge territory. russia has weapons hypersonic missiles that have recently been tested and have no analogues. but the us and the west have nothing of the kind yet. they cannot tolerate someone else's superiority. they do not accept, neither russia, nor china, nor the islamic republic, even india are ready to accept. i understood this. according to the latest negotiations with india on the goals they wanted to achieve, the world today is not what america once imagined it is no longer a unipolar world where they run everything. this world has changed, this will not happen again, but what can the experience of iran and russia teach everyone today? mers the experience of life under sanctions and the experience of western

resistance, we have been the islamic republic of iran for 43 years under sanctions, of course, the sanctions of the last 20 years have become the most difficult, although some argued that they only strengthened their sanctions, the ruling regime in iran is different. it is said that they achieve regime change with these sanctions, however, the regime of sanctions pressure is not is a legal measure, as it generally weakens the people, which they actually seek sanctions. the first thing they get. this is isolation. countries. they wanted to isolate iran second, so that the country's economy would collapse, that is, they wanted to collapse the iranian economy. third, they seek to turn the people against the government. this is what they are trying to do too. in iran, they are doing the same in russia, in all other countries under sanctions, the same thing. however, take a look at the

wound examples for all 43 years. they never could to isolate us, of course we have experienced unpleasant times. however, iran is not a country that can be isolated. iran cannot be isolated , not only because it is a whole civilization , not only because we are part of history, we cannot be isolated, but also for geopolitical reasons, we are in an extremely important point in the world, the islamic revolution demonstrated that we have a very significant position in the world, therefore iran cannot be isolated. they also wanted to destroy our economy. they hit us, but they couldn't destroy our economies. i will give you two examples, one example concerns the coronavirus, when quarantine was introduced, many countries suffered, most seriously. damage, which required them to make the most serious financial injections to preserve their economies. each of the european countries has spent several billion, the americans have spent trillions of our money, which is abroad. they do not return us, they did not give us medicines,

their attitude towards us is cruel. however, we were able to overcome the coronavirus, keeping up with other countries, the second example is that i was a deputy of the iranian parliament for 22 years. i remember how the volume of the non-oil sector of the iranian economy was $1.5 billion, but despite the sanctions by 2021. our non-oil sector has grown to $50 billion. that is, despite the sanctions, we have achieved impressive growth in various areas. including in biotechnology in stem cell research. we have made significant progress in russia is the same, russia is a very large country. you have a very powerful tool in your hands energy tools in your hands your grain people who are born and grow up in harsh climatic conditions. it seems to me that sanctions will only strengthen your national economy. russia's economic opportunities are extremely wide. and you can use the sanctions as an opportunity,

as a chance that we have realized in our country. we have spoken to other countries under sanctions in the past. let's create a club of sanctioned countries to stick together. why is it necessary sanctions violate human rights sanctions hit the weakest sanctions the most hurt the government directly. they directly harm people, as people start to earn less and become weaker, so they lie when they say that sanctions against the government cannot be allowed to be legitimized, the sanctions regime is a regime of oppression of a person. we will definitely deal with this oppression . and you say, a club of sanctioned countries, but here you really need to remember that countries that do not join the sanctions or are under sanctions at the same time open up new prospects for them. economic cooperation, if we talk about the future. russia and iran, what are they?

where do you see them today? in what sectors of the economy? i see bright prospects and wounds. russia has shown that they do not care about the issue of sanctions. we are two neighboring countries, the sanctions will pass sooner or later, but we need to cooperate in a serious way and we have huge opportunities for cooperation. one of these areas is the creation of a north-south transport corridor, the optimal route connecting east asia with europe is through iran and russia therefore, together we must develop this route as the second area of ​​cooperation. it can be energy. we must certainly cooperate in this area, fortunately during the visit of our leadership of our cabinet to russia and also during the return visit. mr. novakov tehran , this issue was raised and we started to work in this direction. the third area of ​​cooperation is our common economic needs for you. fruits vegetables building materials bags

shoes leather products need many other items and the islamic republic of iran is ready to supply all this to russia. we need cereals, technologies and much more that we can get in russia, our relations are actively expanding, because there is a sense in this, a basis that does not depend on sanctions, which do not depend on from today's state of affairs. we are two neighboring countries, we are connected by the caspian sea, which is a sea of ​​security and cooperation. iran is a large country with various opportunities. russia is a very large country with very great opportunities. and we just we cannot but cooperate with each other, moreover, as i said earlier, our views, our positions are very close, you see today the risk for international law and international institutions , they have long been in danger of being used as a tool, we are 43 years after our revolution

this is good , understood these international institutions are intended. why some say we care about peace and security. why does this institution not oppose the united states, which endangered international peace and security organization, legitimizing the us invasion anywhere, even if the state does not pose a threat to anyone and complies with all international laws, or take, for example, israel has issued a lot of resolutions on israel. which of these resolutions has been implemented, those resolutions that are directed against the people of palestine, those that are being implemented are the same that are directed against israel, they simply create the appearance of condemnation. let's talk about human rights. how many human rights institutions do we have , and what about human rights, how are things affairs in afghanistan the americans stood in afghanistan for 20 years what did they say when they entered afghanistan they said that they would build there? state after 20 years of building a state

in what state did they leave afghanistan, don’t human rights apply to the population of afghanistan look at other peoples of the world , let’s take yemen killed in recent years, the yemenis had human rights people and people. americans are simply destroying international institutions. something about human rights. there's the next problem. terrorism terrorists. they are operating with might and main in the region, they have captured most of the cancer, they have captured a significant part of syria, they have captured many other areas, they are committing the most brutal and inhuman acts. in relation to women, men are beheaded and people are burned alive. and what happened, we see how the terrorists are helped. do not be an islamic republic. if there were no cooperation between russia and iran where would the terrorists be now. our innocently killed general qasem soleimani played a huge role in countering, but instead of to thank. the americans were so

angry that they simply destroyed the person who fought against terrorism. is this not evidence of us support for terrorists? if they came to the war to fight terrorism, they would stand shoulder to shoulder with us, and would not kill our commander, who fought terrorists and the whole world sees that they are using terrorists, like a tool. if they want to invade somewhere, then everything starts right there. and where are the international institutions, where are the international institutions that are fighting against terrorism and protect human rights, protect peace and security, they only churn out resolutions over and over again without any guarantees of their implementation. behind them are the man-hating forces of the west, and especially the united states, in my opinion. we are witnessing the collapse of the world's morality. the mass media do not show what is really happening in the world, as mr. putin said, they built the empire. and these are the right words. they do their best to

stifle the voices of truth. how do you rate today the quality of the international dialogue on the nuclear program of iran and what is the position of iran i believe that the position of iran for decades has been transparent we have repeatedly stated that we pursue only peaceful goals in the development of nuclear energy, we have never left the negotiating table, and were committed to everything treaty that signed this three main points, which iran strictly observes in the context of nuclear energy. and what did we get in return. we 've been falsely accused of trying to build an atomic bomb, what has never been and will not be in our defense doctrine and our supreme leader, who, from the point of view of shiism, is a role model and passed a fatwa, which has the force of law, which states that iran will not turn off the peaceful path in the development of the atom the second americans and representatives. countries