the information is an unfounded assertion that russia is allegedly preventing the higher education of grain from the territory of ukraine by sea, because of which, allegedly, the world is threatened with starvation for everyone. it is known that the export of ziran is hindered by mines, installed by the armed forces of ukraine, they are something else that hinders the export of grain. explosive, you understand, this degree of absurdity is such that they will continue to say that the grain itself does not want to leave the territory of ukraine, you understand this is beyond , in general, everything reasonable and everything explainable. let's just go through the fact. explosive devices are placed everywhere by the armed forces of ukraine, including from agricultural land, port facilities , sea areas, the russian military, on the contrary , stressed, on the contrary, they are working to deactivate them and about 2,000 hectares have already been cleared of mines.

imagine the ports in mariupol berdyansky resumed work, after the military of russia and the dpr cleared the territory and fairways from explosive and other objects, and on may 31, the first dry cargo picture loaded in the port left mariupol for rostov-on-don, it cannot be refuted. this is confirmed by the data. well, this is not just a statement. this is a statement that is accompanied by facts, photo materials, please, geolocation and so on and so forth. russia is ready to provide conditions for the export of grain from odessa to other ports on the black and azov seas, as we have repeatedly said at all levels, the russian armed forces daily open maritime humanitarian corridors for the unimpeded movement of ships, we emphasize once again that in the event of

demining the water area, we will be ready to provide safe export of grain, including escorting the transport ship to the international waters of the black sea. russia is also ready to supply its grain to all countries in need, but once again. we would like to emphasize and we very much hope that this information will reach the end consumer, it is the west that, for the sake of its political, by the way, and commercial interests, has introduced restrictions on the entry of foreign ships into russian ports for servicing russian ships in foreign ports, and also created insurmountable barriers in insurance and, uh, banking transactions. i'll repeat. once again, russia is ready to supply its grain to all countries in need, if the united states and the eu countries

really want to solve the problem of the world year, which they now only say they must cancel. appropriate restrictions and then all those who need it will be able to get it anyway, but obviously. we will, apparently, repeatedly return to this topic now to what is happening on the cultural and humanitarian track, because, uh, of course, this is what the collective west has come up with and is trying to implement. this is the total destruction of all those achievements in the development of our civilization, which have not been proud of for so many years in connection with the order of the government of the russian federation on the termination of the memorandum of understanding between the government of the russian federation and the us government on the principles of

cooperation in the field of culture, the humanities , social sciences, education means media , which was signed in moscow 2 september 1998. and i would like to note the following large-scale deployment by the us authorities. as you know, the campaign to discredit russian culture, if at all . the phrase is, in principle, possible, but in practice they are trying to implement it, the aggressive steps taken by the us intelligence services and law enforcement agencies against the leadership and activists of the corruption council of the organization of russian compatriots, who have traditionally been engaged in promotion of the russian language. the history of our country of tradition is actually completely undermined, the activities of this structure as a whole, what the united states of america is doing now, their satellites in the persecution of the russian cultural and historical heritage on a global scale, has a goal. they talk about it directly. how they formulate the abolition of everything

connected with russia is an absurd wording, an absurd logic. but perhaps we just live in such an era. and probably they really don’t understand what they are doing, and western countries don’t particularly hide the fact that the corresponding decision is being made by politics and no one to us consideration is put under attack the legacy of russian writers, poets, composers, artists, engineers, and even topographical names. well, this is not a blow to us. this is a blow to world civilization. here, what's the problem? the absurdity and futility of such a campaign is obvious to all sane educated people who have the intellect such actions of the americans led to the further preservation of this memorandum. it just lost its meaning, the corresponding note with notification was handed over on june 1, and to the embassy the united states of america in moscow once again

draws the attention of the american side to any unfriendly attack. e washington will be followed by an inevitable, adequate response to the situation when the us administration is exposing the real persecution of the national culture and all its carriers. i would continue to promote in russia as if nothing had happened. but my value projects and so on under some kind of memorandum is more unacceptable. incidentally, this is a similar story, but from another sphere in connection with the occupied kingdom of norway, there are no friendly lines in relation to our country, after the start of a special military operation in ukraine by oslo joining the anti-russian sanctions of the european union and attempts to exert economic and political pressure on our country, it was decided to suspend cooperation with norway in the field of nuclear and radiation safety during the meeting of the profile commission of the norwegian the side was announced a freeze on further work and the implementation of joint projects under

bilateral agreements. well, of course. eu diplomacy i believe that, as you know, our diplomatic academy has developed and published the so-called diplomatic dictionary. so i think that there should be a separate item. e, an explanation has been made about what am diplomacy of the european union of the times of the barrel is, a can be expanded a and give the prerequisites for the formation of this phenomenon, but one way or another. i think that this name should be entered into historical dictionaries in the appropriate context. so we drew attention to the recent joint statement by the eu high representative for foreign affairs and security policy jose pobareliya and others. actually the representatives of the european commission on the occasion of the world day for cultural diversity for dialogue and development. a. it seems that the date was originally intended to contribute to

the day itself. yes, yes, the format, and e, should have contributed to the rapprochement of peoples of different cultures. so in the eu, it is used as another reason for inciting conflict rhetoric against our country. we fully agree that cultural diversity is a fragile concept, apparently, this is precisely why the european union failed to maintain its subjective meaning; commitment to global cultural dialogue was simply replaced by open calls from a number of eu capitals to ignore individual languages, national culture, artistic literary musical masterpieces. under the ban are russian literature, the work of domestic composers at the art exhibition of our films. tv channels news resources. by the way, even restaurants of russian cuisine are conducting a targeted campaign to falsify history, including the role of our people, in world war ii, a significant increase in cases of vandalism and the destruction of soviet

monuments is recorded. what we tirelessly say and do. moreover, brussels completely ignores the mass cleansing of everything russian in ukraine and the baltic countries for many years. what a lot of years for several decades, and all this began long before the special military operation, which they now cover up their uh, unsightly actions. we talked about this all the time. i'm not talking about public now space, i'm negotiating so many materials. it was transmitted as although it is strange to transmit anything at all. these are their countries. i mean, the baltics are strange members of the eu because it was going on there in the relations of the russian-speaking population for decades, in fact, they should have been fixed, just in brussels and in the very same european commission, but for some reason they didn’t fix it, so we helped them and transmitted a large amount of data, which they took into account. and by the way, speaking at some stage, they even expressed their concern about this

cause, but they didn’t take any specific actions, because they didn’t know how, but why now we see from the sanctions they can introduce and even steal state private property under political pretexts, they can close the media , block accounts, what else they can, and they also know how to make sensational lists none of this or anything like that has ever been used to put in place those who for decades persecuted the national minority in their territories, and countries now in particular i'm talking about fishing. that is, it turns out. all this was done on purpose in order to destroy in every possible way everything that is connected with our culture by our common culture. it has never been privatized, it has always been said that people who are involved, who are followers and

keepers of the culture of our culture live all over the world and supplement and enrich it with daily work, it is obvious that the promises of the european commissioners to protect and develop culture that were voiced in the statement are far from real aspirations european union and i would put it like this, maybe they want to protect and develop a culture of cancellation. and this is completely different. the history of misunderstanding is caused by the accusations of russia, as they were formulated, in the deliberate destruction of the culture of ukraine, its institutions and heritage, in general, about what? generally people who make such statements. they generally understand anything, and in the history of our common space, modern realities. we have a huge

number of worth monuments. ah. i don’t know, i don’t know, it’s not easy, the street is a huge amount of e geographical objects objects of culture monuments connected, uh, with our common common history or with the history of u ukraine as u and the republic that was part of the soviet union and beyond, and how who and when tried deliberately, as they said, to destroy the culture of ukraine unlike from our neighbors to similar behavior. we have never been involved in the demolition of a monument to ukrainian figures and the renaming of streets named after them, we do not and never did. here is the question. how the pumping of the kyiv regime weapons, which are then used for destructive actions, including in living quarters, is consistent with the goal declared by the european union to protect and restore ukrainian

culture, this question remains open. in general, there is another manifestation of the destructive logic of brussels, which is ready to give up the basic principles of international humanitarian cooperation and politicize the culture of sports, scientific and technical cooperation in order to achieve its own, its own or formulated goals of tasks. and, of course, youth politics. it probably has always been, but it has always come from some civilized framework. yes , such is life. really. many areas were subject to, and this political influence from the outside, but politicization and so on to double standards. well, it's not about double standards anymore. and the destruction of everything that humanity has been going for centuries and millennia of its true intentions in the european union, by tradition, are trying to hide behind some such beautiful slogans, as they write out, as they know how to

do it. well, it does every day. it's getting worse obvious consequences of attempts to fence off. this russian culture is already making itself felt. ah. by the way, about everything that is connected with the abolition of pressure on e, there is a humanitarian track and so on. as you know, in the field of the united states continue to carry out targeted repression, no pressure, no impact of repression against russian media journalists. they are methodically clearing their information space of any news sources that do not suit washington . it has been for many years now. now it entered some kind of terminal stage for its washington because it completely destroyed all illusions about the true attitude to such basic concepts for democracy as freedom of speech and dependent journalism, pluralism and so on. here comes the entire arsenal of means under the pressure of dissent, in addition to

direct bans, the bank accounts of our correspondents and representative offices of russian media that cooperate with our reporters , operators, in general, everyone here, everyone who at least somehow touches. e with the russian media presence of the united states and then all kinds of restrictions are imposed, opportunities for paying salaries are blocked, financing for renting premises, and so on, they do not extend visas, they do not extend accreditation for russian correspondents. they refuse to issue new ones against the background of the fact that when we take retaliatory measures, hysteria begins there, it is completely forgotten that retaliatory measures are being taken and the story is being circulated that some american or anglo-saxon journalist allegedly suffered from the russian power machine. yes, that's all response measures. moreover, for many years we have been taking

these responses months later. after we used every opportunity to convince our western so-called partners of the harmfulness of such destructive logic and actions against journalists. we tried to use all the possibilities of diplomacy, all the possibilities of cooperation and interaction in order to prevent such a development of events, when washington purposefully destroyed the russian media presence in its country, but, apparently, the plan was long term. everything is being done by washington so that any production and production economic activity of domestic media on american territory is simply impossible to be banned from falling under

restrictions, and so on. here is just one example. i can enumerate the list, because we have received factual data directly from journalists and the media, a huge list in order to apply to them, well, here's just an example until the seventh of june. all legal and u.s. individuals are ordered to terminate any relationship with russia's three largest tv channels, first russia 1 and ntv, on the sole grounds that they are now directly related to or acting for the russian government. they do not hesitate to threaten companies outside the national jurisdiction with secondary sanctions for cooperation with russian media operators. well , that is, just to make it clear what is at stake. that is, if we are talking about relaying a signal through a satellite that operates in another parts of the planet, is not connected with the united

states or american companies at all, then measures of influence will also apply to him. in washington and what they are, and we know very well what they already know, not even an eagle. it's something heavier. washington is actively attracting the largest it companies such as google apple, which owns facebook and instagram, matt twitter and others. uh, to his russophobic line. this is being done in conjunction with squeezing out the russian information presence of the states and is being done. this in order to simply block all digital resources associated with our media. that is, the cleansing is going on global dissent anywhere, the alternative point of view is different, and

the submission of data is other data that is provided on topical issues. they wouldn't leak anywhere. the refusal of the american side from the practice of open censorship of the russian mass media will not remain without reaction. and this, of course, is not censoring, but simply the media from the entire media space, that is, they have no complaints about form of activity, e russian journalists, chickens, items and so on. they would very much like to find something to complain about, but they did not find any flaws in the transmitted information either from the point of view, or simply the presence of journalists and correspondents on their territory. points there were no complaints. so, if the work of the russian media operators of journalists is not

normalized in the united states, the most stringent retaliatory measures will inevitably follow for this on monday, june 6 at the press center of the russian ministry of foreign affairs will invite the heads of the moscow offices of all american mass media to explain to them the consequences of the hostile line of their government. and perhaps they will understand better their regime in the field of the media and in general media issues. we look forward to tea coffee cookies for us. ah, and now, by the way, to the question that our journalists who work in the western media space endured so much. here is just a sketch of how to truly relate to the value

of freedom of speech, and our anglo-saxon partners in quotation marks a few words about the traditions of british propaganda. this is just a real british series that we learn about how london takes care of freedom of speech, but in fact under the pretext of the development of the media. he is simply engaged in interference in the internal affairs of russia of other countries. the theme is inexhaustible. i can tell you for sure, we have already found out that these well colonial traditions are rooted in the bloody in the history of the british empire, revanchist sentiments in the united kingdom are still strong the european union at some point simply began to interfere with their implementation. and this was also one of the reasons, by the way, for brexit. so now we have come to the stage when individual evidence. the results of hacker disclosures are documents from open sources. the results of journalistic investigations. all this allows you to put the puzzles together into a single picture, and it turns out to be

terrible. as a result, i the interested public gets a complete picture and what what is important is based on the facts that have received such cross-validation, and the subversive activities of the foreign office are the british foreign office around the world, of course, the british foreign office. one would not cope with his order officially. go to the british council structures, the british media and, of course, trusted contractors. if necessary , structures are created that combine the diplomatic intelligence, military and propaganda potential of the british state mechanism with the participation of american curators. well, where without them, as they say, the anglo-saxon anglo-saxon eyes are not vyklyut. yes, they won’t pull it out, but the hand is also present there in washington, well, just a small digression. uh, just like to say, i'm the succession of the worst interagency london practitioners

. so the other day the newspaper e daily news edged. a has published a book review. how to organize a coup d'état it was released by an expert on the history of espionage subversive activities roy cormac quote from this book during the cold war great britain had a special media program in the middle east in africa and parts of asia in the mid-1950s and until the end of 1970 a special branch of the british foreign office headquartered in london increased instability manipulated the mood of incitement to commit crimes exacerbated inter-ethnic conflicts with the help of anti-communist propaganda. the end of the stages, what is it about the activities of the information research department. uh, in fact, it was created after the

second world war by the leybari government to combat soviet propaganda in britain in the mid-sixties of the last century. 360 agency agents worked in this department. in fact it was a top-secret writing unit for now the attention of news reports. clear. what kind of news is this, and this is disinformation, this is precisely the culture of fakes that has been formed, as we now understand, over decades. in britain , they did a great job of falsifying the statements of official soviet organizations and representatives, and so forward from 1965 to 1972, the department released at least 11 fake reports on behalf of the soviet state press agency. news can imagine the level. on the one hand, this is not very

much, but only at first glance, because it all happened at turning points, and in the history of a particular region they were an attempt to influence. in the course of events, british agents used various tricks to prevent the expansion of the influence of the soviet union in 1963 . they issued a statement on behalf of a fictitious international federation of democratic youth, which allegedly claimed that africans are a quote from a fake produced in britain, uncivilized, primitive and morally weak. the forgery received wide coverage in the african press. many newspapers reacted harshly to this statement. well, it doesn't look like anything . yes, of course, one to one dodechek has not changed, people are full of the same secret operations to combat the influence of russia through

husbands and fakes. today we just turned around at full capacity at a new historical stage baton from the information research department, adopted, established in 2017. the so-called, but they were no longer shy department, according to your russian unit it was called upon to implement, uh, the british strategy. in russia, the coordination of primarily information and propaganda efforts in the russian direction is evidenced by data from the government portal information disclosure , according to which up to 21 years in the framework of a specialized conflict prevention fund to promote stability and security. the british foreign office carried out a large-scale program to counter disinformation and develop media, including in russian, the program notes that the united kingdom is interacting with a number of partners to improve quality.