this person is actively commenting on the situation that has developed today in ukraine. chris, who is now between russia and america, and his view is somewhat different from the official view of washington, and he says that the americans in ukraine are wrong, as it turned out, the americans are very well versed in aspects of ukrainian politics. they know who bendera is , they know who the nazis are, tomorrow they are azov , surname, name, patronymic position.

when did the political elite, in our case, the american one, think of something? and i decided to bring it. this to end. she will do it this way before the eyes of the action, but when it gets on the nose, they retreat, wait, wait, and then pay again, dear price, immediate time. we specifically designed this package of sanctions in order to maximize the impact on russia in the long term and minimize the effect, that is, for the united states and our allies, but among those who do not like us so much on the other side of the ocean, there are still sensible people who understand that from russia and without the russian people there is no life on earth, and they are trying to reason with people who make decisions that are successful or

successful, and we will judge, but the main thing is that they speak and have such an opportunity. so scott ritter is a difficult question, in the end a country that orders its soldiers to participate in a military operation, like the one that is going on in ukraine , is responsible, russia gave such an order, but russia justified its actions, according to international law, referring to the fifty- first article, there is no un charter, an acceptable right to self-defense goes e position

i see him. russia, the newly emerged republics of the lpr and the dpr, had no choice but to start this operation to protect themselves from the ukrainian forces that were concentrating right on the border and threatening the inhabitants of luhansk donetsk no. there is no doubt that the circumstances that forced russia to launch this special military operation were largely instigated by other parties. i mean, the united states of america, the european union and nato, the ukrainian

government was also involved, russia justified its military operation, because the ethnic russians and russian- speaking population in luhansk donetsk were a real threat from the kiev regime before the start of the operation. russia recognized the lpr and the dpr as independent republics . before, russia believed that these regions were part of ukraine and it respected. ё territorial integrity until the last moment it was an internal ukrainian problem, the ukrainian government and some armed groups such as the nationalist battalions azov aidar right sector terrorized ethnic russians in luhansk donetsk to such an extent that they were forced to respond to it as a result, almost a civil war broke out. good, then

the bandits and the damned disappeared. oh, what are you, son, taking pictures of me, what are you taking pictures of? it's a pity? he people lie, take away. oh-oh-oh, oh-oh-oh, oh, vasenka, oh, poor oh mom, but it was inside the ukrainian conflict, then russia intervened diplomatically and , together with germany, france in the so-called normandy format, they were looking for a diplomatic solution the problem that has arisen. i think that russia was honest and wanted to enforce the minsk-2 agreements so that donetsk and lugansk would get autonomy. this would prevent further confrontation. but ukraine, apparently, did not want to fulfill its obligations, and in this it was supported by germany, france, which was also in bad faith. assumed functions

resulted in the death of 14,000 people. we must clearly understand this. 14,000 people died because the ukrainian government did not want to fulfill what they promised to fulfill. small. it was a ukrainian problem before russia recognized the independence of luhansk donetsk, a separate problem is the expansion of nato to the east. it was done in a very hypocritical way. in fact. nato was created as a defensive alliance a in 1992 , there was no longer any reason for its existence

by this time the soviet union and the organization of the warsaw pact countries no longer actually existed ; why nato continues to exist we are told the alliance has outgrown into a political association, and now it is not only of a military nature. but then it's also unclear. why is nato expanding to the east as a military alliance and why is nato violating the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe, which helped to achieve a strategic balance of power nato's behavior in the nineties and two thousandths. it was more and more destabilizing not only for russia but also for the whole of europe, as a result, the alliance was transformed from a defensive one into an alliance that performs offensive actions. everyone is talking about the fifth article of the nato charter is collective self-defense, but all nato wars began according to the fourth article,

according to which, after consultations, the alliance can decide that someone poses a threat, respectively, nato can deal with him, kosovo there was the fourth article. it was not a defense against nato, no one attacked. there is no doubt that russia opposed nato expansion from the very first day, you just need to read the transcripts of telephone conversations between then russian president boris yeltsin and former us president bill clinton in order to understand that this is not vladimir putin's problem, this is russia's problem. i want to clearly understand your idea. nato expansion, because now i see nothing in it but humiliation for russia, what do you want to achieve with this, if russia is your partner , people ask about it, and i also ask what you want to achieve with this, we need a new european security structure. they are those old people in central europe who believe in themselves boris they understand that it would hurt you a lot if they suddenly ended up in nato in an instant but they don’t know what will happen

with russia if you leave russia has always cared about nato expansion and has always seen it as a threat to russian security and russia has voiced these concerns on numerous occasions but they have been ignored over and over again nato has continued to expand from the very beginning. we see that nato and the us are behaving disrespectfully to the russian laws of security interests, which are rooted in yalta and tehran and to what stalin told roosevelt and churchill about the importance of the soviet union to its interests. shake germany passed through poland twice in the same century, and russia doesn't want that to happen again. these are not putin's inventions, these are russian preoccupations that have historical roots the united states triumphed after the collapse of the soviet union we won the cold war were the winners and russia was the loser and we

treated russia as defeated we sent people there not to help her, but, to use it if you look at the prerequisites for the emergence of the oligarchic class in russia if you look at the corruption that arose in in the late soviet union, this became possible as a result of the implementation of economic policies by the united states and the west from the very beginning , we saw that the west had its own vision of russia to keep the country in a weakened state, politically and militarily since 1996. we praised the presidential elections because we bought the russian elections we praised the us elections because we went to russia and did everything to steal the elections for boris yeltsin if anyone wants to talk about interference in the elections, then i present to you attention to the 1996 elections in russia and the role of america

in them. okay, not about that now, when yeltsin left , vladimir putin came to his place, and here we saw indignation from the united states because we realized that russia had chosen a leader who would not continue the previous politics politics of boris yeltsin i try to stick to historical facts and our realities between these two things there is a connection i entered the civil service at a time when the soviet union was a threat we and my fellow military officers were focused on problem of the soviet union, as well as people in the state department. we treated the soviet union as an enemy, our motto was know the enemy as yourself, so we studied russia. i studied the history of russia, i plunged into it without a trace. i

studied russian, but i didn't do well. okay. i'm not a very good linguist, but i tried to look. i came to the soviet union in june 1988 . many americans do not understand what was happening at this time in june of the eighty- eighth year, all the allied conferences were held . communist party of the ussr if you know mikhail gorbachev if you know the history of perestroika gorbachev then changed the very essence of the soviet system from old-style communism, he made a new presidential form of government and gave power to the supreme soviet and so on. i understand this because i was there when it all happened. i've been following all of this. i understand the essence of the last years of government. gorbachev's main idea of ​​perestroika, including in all directions. political reform economic reform multinational states. i dragged. well, i think that's

what we are now so dealing with this reality, what is our country? i think our people still do not understand that they are losing their country. i understand what happened when yeltsin became the head of the country, because i have this knowledge. this is my information. i use them to form my current point of view, the people who advise the us government today do not have this knowledge. we're talking about michael mcfall. we're talking fiona hill i named them putin's exorcists are people who were focused on studying the soviet union and russia, not for the purpose of understanding it, but for the purpose of using it to their advantage of economic interests. and when putin took over russia, these people , instead of trying to understand, the reasons that led to the emergence of such a president

, they began to attack him, they began to call him an autocrat, a dictator, the kgb officers are ignorant people. and those who advise our government today. these are the same people who work in the media as well. this is a very good and difficult question, united states. unfortunately, this is a nation that does not understand the importance of history. we talk a lot about it, we talk about the founding fathers about our constitution, about abraham linkan , about the emancipation from slavery of the first world war, and the democracy of the lisa roosevelt tapes, we say different things, but we do not understand what they really mean and what the real story is. i will give you one example, the united states of america and the soviet union along with great britain france and others allies fought against nazi germany

- this is a struggle in which we collectively won together. but when you start to study it in detail, you will find out that the soviet union made the greatest contribution to this. and that without the soviet union , victory would not have been guaranteed, and he sacrificed so much for the sake of this victory, so many so many that we can’t even name the exact number of dead 22 million, 27 3237 million. who then lived knew it they knew it respected. they understood it, they saw it. and you can read the transcripts of the yalta conference to see that roosevelt understood these victims, but when was the last time the united states celebrated victory in europe when was the last time we had a parade in honor of our heroes. we also sacrificed a lot for the victory over nazi germany, we no

longer celebrate it, as if we had forgotten it and moved on russia has not forgotten. i lived in the former soviet union, votkinsk, and i saw these monuments to these heroes. and every may 9, i saw a march in the streets the immortal regiment with photographs of those who gave their lives people honored their tradition of victory russia has not forgotten this and should not forget what was done to it. i think that the russian people better understand the threat posed by any possible resurrection of neo-nazi ideology, especially the neighbors of the slavic country, the united states, we are again very superficial in history. we say some things, but do not understand what they really mean you have become so passionate about the confrontation with russia that we do not see reality, for example, ukraine is a very interesting moment. most people don't know that during world war ii there was the twelfth department of the general staff of the

german army. he worked in the east. it was led by a general named gehlen at the end of world war ii. he was captured by the united states, but instead of being denocified, they put him in jail so that he could no longer be a threat to anyone. we took him into our service along with his entire organization, because he had a spy network on the former occupied territories of the soviet union, including in ukraine, where a guy named banderra and other nationalists continued to resist the soviet union and from the forty- fourth to the fifty-fourth years. there was active resistance for 10 years, then about 300,000 people died, 300,000 people lost 100,000 lives. of these, 200,000 were poles, a mixture of russians and ukrainians, and almost 40,000 soldiers of the red army died. it was a serious fight. and it

financed the cia to the americans. you funded them we supported them the cia declassified documents detailing the relationship of the organization. elena and stepan bandera also say that the united states of america financed anti-soviet resistance through organizations such as the ukrainian insurgent army and the like in order for them to resist in the territories of the soviet union until 1954. after the military resistance was broken, we continued to finance the bandera movement so that he could continue his political activity not only within the soviet territory, but in other places where migrants left canada, the usa and other countries. and this funding continued until 1990. therefore,

the thesis that we did not know anything about the real state of affairs of the bandera movement is simply an absurdity of the highest degree in 2014. we helped politically resurrect the bandera movement. we brought him to the maidan and used it as a weapon against yanukovych and we overthrew the laws of the elected president. they replaced it with a revolutionary movement dominated by neo-nazis. we are it we knew we knew so much that the us congress in 2015 voted for a law under which these nazis cannot be trained because they are terrible people the us congress recognized that the azov battalion and its derivatives from nazi organizations that cannot be funded by the us but our hatred for russia not love for her and fear of putin made us forget it and made us

support these people, the american media used to honestly talk about the base back in 2019, the mainstream media said that ukraine exists problem with nazism. but today, if i tweeted that i was blocked on twitter that there is a nazi problem in ukraine, i would be blocked for disinformation by anyone who looks at the tattoos on the hands of those who were just captured at azov steel, you know what there is not just a problem with the nazis the nazis dominate ukraine. this is a complex issue. especially for an ex-military who was trained from the very beginning to kill his enemies and no questions should arise on this subject. it's all sorts, but how only you ceased to be my enemy. you raised

your hands, you gave up or you were injured or immobilized, my duty is to take care of you. i can interrogate you with questions. you're a prisoner of war, but i care about you. i'm giving you the same medical care that i would give to my wounded marine. i give you the same food as i give my marines. i give you blood i am obliged to do it, then international laws not only because we were taught so. we fight like this and we believe in it so that and therefore, when i see stories like this coming from ukraine when soldiers trained by the americans are allegedly committing atrocities against russian soldiers. it hurts me. straight into the heart. this is an unverified video. we live in the age of propaganda. we must admit this, because this war is very full of propaganda. especially on

the part of ukraine, they have become real masters of the information war against russia, and russia is losing this war. i say, as there are ukrainian fighters at the beginning of azovstal. every single one laid down their arms and surrendered no one was left on the territory of the industrial zone demining began from the point of view of america russia does not present itself very effectively in the information space, and the ukrainians work with the americans. they have specialists from the cia of the european union mi-6 information about the evacuation of ukrainian defenders. out of tiredness, the pages of the world media still do not converge. under what conditions it was possible to withdraw part of the military from there. and what will happen to them further, our colleagues understood this. let's see stuff in the night with monday to tuesday 53 seriously wounded ukrainian defenders. they evacuated from the territory of azov to the hospital at the vaz. and another 211 soldiers were delivered through the humanitarian corridor, the

ukrainian command decided to withdraw the military in order to save their lives, the ministry of defense reported. they fully fulfilled all the tasks set by the command, the best propagandists in the world. it's the american mainstream media that 's just flooding the american european markets with information that's fake. a misconception that is distorted not only in regards to ukrainian successes but also russian failures russia's failure is not that the russians are losing. and ukraine is winning battles. they say that russia is a terrible terrible country. whose army entered ukraine and does terrible things to ukrainians there wear steal steal kill kill people who hear it see a non-professional russian soldier as an animal, so when a story appears that the ukrainian military torture and kill captured russians. soldier mainstream media in the us in most cases ignore it, we just don't hear about them, and to

find out about it. we need to look deeper and purposefully look for this information. therefore, if you think that you will hear something like this in the american media, then you are mistaken, but some videos were so terrible that it was impossible not to show them, but they justify them in the following way ukrainians do not see in russian soldiers of people, they rather see them as criminals and murderers of terrorists of people who do not deserve protection, according to the geneva convention. unfortunately, some americans believe it. let's say that a russian soldier, for example, was a rapist, murderer and thief. he committed these crimes, it would be my duty if i took him prisoner, feed him, take care of him, take him into custody, put him on trial. according to the law on those nar. in which he is accused and he should have been given the opportunity to defend himself in court. i

do not apply the presumption of guilt and not shooting him or torturing him. that is, even if you want to believe everything that they say about russia, that's all it doesn’t justify what they are doing to the russians today’s confrontation is a struggle between nato and russia for the future of russia it’s not about defeating russia in ukraine it’s all in order to hit russia so hard and so painfully so that russia can no longer launch any military operation in europe that would threaten european countries. i don't make up those words. this is what us officials say publicly when this conflict began. the us has already provided several military aid to ukraine. hundreds million dollars annually, we trained the ukrainian military, provided them with

non-lethal weapons, vehicles and lethal weapons, namely jivelin missiles and new javel missiles . good ones can knock out tanks on them, and the old ones, for example, released in the ninety-sixth and not upgraded, are not very good. we give ukraine these old missiles and most of them do not work and they are not very effective. i think that the ukrainian government does not say anything about this, because they do not want to offend, the united states then we say that we should give them more help. we don't give them the best weapons. we give them an old ifv from the vietnam war. i don't think they have specialists who can fix the engine if something breaks, it's not very good equipment and they won't last long on a modern battlefield, as far as the jackdaw is concerned. m. three sevens they are normal, but these are not the best guns in the world. they are difficult to use and have a

significant impact on the battlefield. they don't either bring. and now we come to the root of the problem. in the beginning, the united states provided ukraine with weapons worth $53 billion. the budget of the russian ministry of defense for 2021 is around $43 billion. in the first four months of the conflict, we gave ukraine $10 billion more assistance than russia spends on all his defense for the year. even if this equipment is old, even if some of it doesn't work, it's extremely high and we even talk about providing newer weapons when we first started training ukrainians. everything took place in haste. we can say in a panic we trained their designers, some of them went. he quickly studied in germany, poland, and came back. today , ukrainian soldiers are at nato bases in

germany poland and are trained for 40-60 days. this is a more in-depth training in handling more modern weapons. and this weapon gets to the front line. and it can no longer be said that it does not have any influence on the course of the battle, one of the goals of the united states was to enable ukraine to kill. as many russian soldiers as possible. i am i don't know how many have already been killed, but i do know that some of them are definitely being killed and are being killed by the weapons we provide. and when you give weapons worth 53 billion dollars, which results in a lot of killed russian soldiers , or at least there is such a prospect, so the answer to your question is yes. the us aims to keep the conflict going. as long as possible, but there is one more aspect that we need to discuss, not only in

weapons, but also in intelligence. the united states and nato have very good intelligence capabilities without any consequences from russia because we are not involved in the war with russia. so we collect this information and pass it on to the ukrainians. and it allows them to do things that otherwise wouldn't be possible. like, for example, shooting at russian ships and dragging equipment through those zones that russian intelligence does not cover and attacking with helicopters. russian tank farm on russian territory to carry out an attack on the russian military leadership, intelligence along with weapons create the lethality of the ukrainian army, which was not there when this special military operation began. this does not mean that russia is losing the war. this means that the price of victory will be. much higher. i think we can agree that

russia and the us are serious about their military operations. and that this is not a toy for them. this is a major operation. the one and the other. let's talk about iraq us army we went to war with iraq. and it was not a special military operation. we went to war. this means that we have taken everything that our enemy could carry there. it was an enemy we had already defeated once in 1991 for ten years. we did not allow him to rebuild his military machine, so it was very weak. army. we have made full use of our military capabilities in the full application of our military doctrine against a weakened enemy. let's look at russia, russia has very combat-ready armies. i think no one is asking questions about the russian military, the doctrine is serious. i don't want

a russian to come to me with their doctrine, but russia did not take all its power to ukraine, and at least in the beginning it acted in a way that was not consistent with its doctrine. in fact, even today, when russia pulled a lot of firepower . it's still not following her doctrine, it's changing the grant to the current situation. let's talk about the enemy now. russia is confronted by the second largest army in europe, the army, which has been trained by nato for 7 years, the ukrainian army is well equipped. she has a great command and a good organization. she is well trained and she operates on a doctrine similar to nato, therefore a world-class adversary of russia. this is a huge difference between what the us did in iraq and

what russia is doing in ukraine, there is a huge difference, no comparisons here and there can be no russian ethnically diverse country, you can go to the east of the country to see that non-ethnic russians live there. you can go to the caucasus and see people there who do not belong to the russian ethnos and yet russia is a country where it has sunk. is russian culture, but it is much more tolerant of non-russian people compared to ukrainian nationalists, ukrainian nationalists are modern descendants of german nationalists who believe in the purity of the race. that

is why they are committing a terrible crime against ethnic russians against ethnic poles against gypsies and so on. this is what the conflict is that is going on right now to ask why the kharkov football club became anti-russian the population of kharkov how they moved away from russia and joined them in the nazi ideology. why did they start getting tattoos of adolf hitler and stepan bandera why did the russian-speaking residents of kharkov get stepan bandera tattooed ? i don't think we're talking about a confrontation between two russias. that certain diseases spread in ukraine, which allowed such an altered consciousness to germinate and metastasize, and it began to affect the whole of ukraine. thank you for

agreeing to talk with us. i hope that our contacts will continue and you have nothing to fear that you talking to russians, although many either refuse or are afraid. new, apparently, a courageous person and free. all the best.

hello, i'm already in crimea, the weather is wonderful 30 ° , no one is rushing to the most interesting place, when i tell them about what i feel, they listen, but they don't hear. and that's bad. no one can rewrite our history. this is just one of the folders prepared by the soviet accusations for the international military tribunal in nuremberg, no one will always close the borders for us. always online people are so strong. wow you froze breaks, we watch the masterpieces of the world documentary hero. now we really miss the classics, new items, exclusives. 15 years free without registration, watch in the application or

on the website.

ukrainian mig-29 was shot down in an air battle on slavyansky, and in the odessa region, a transport an-26, which transported weapons and equipment, was announced by the ministry of defense, and the military department also reported that high-precision missiles near kiev