this person is actively commenting on the situation that has developed today in ukraine. chris, who is now between russia and america, and his view is somewhat different from the official view of washington, and he says that the americans in ukraine are wrong, as it turned out, the americans are very well versed in aspects of ukrainian politics. they know who bendera is, they know who the nazis are, tomorrow they are azov, surname, name, patronymic position.

when did the political elite, in our case, the american one, think of something? and i decided to bring it. this to end. she will do this in this way, the shares are different in the eyes, but when they get hit on the nose, they retreat, wait, and then pay the expensive price again immediately and specifically designed this package of sanctions in order to optimize the impact on russia in the long term and minimize the effect, that is, to the united states and our allies, but among those who do not like us so much on the other side of the ocean, there are still sane people who understand that there is no life from russia and without the russian people earth, and they are trying to reason with people who

make decisions that are successful or successful, and for us to judge. the main thing is what they say and have such an opportunity. so cattle ritter is a difficult question, in the end, a country that orders its soldiers to participate in a military operation, like the one that is now going on in ukraine, is responsible for russia gave such an order, but russia justified its actions, according to international law, referring to the fifty- first article , there is no un charter, the right to self-defense comes from this position

this is a minus. russia, the newly emerged republics of the lpr and the dpr, had no choice but to start this operation to protect themselves from the ukrainian forces that were concentrating right on the border and threatening the inhabitants of luhansk donetsk no. there is no doubt that the circumstances that forced russia to launch this special military operation were largely instigated by other parties. i mean, the united states of america, the european union and

nato, the ukrainian government is also involved, russia justified its military operation, because that the kiev regime posed a real threat to the ethnic russians and russian-speaking population in lugansk donetsk before the start of the operation. russia recognized the lpr and the dpr as independent republics. and before, russia believed that these regions were part of ukraine and it respected. its territorial integrity until the last moment. it was an internal ukrainian problem, the ukrainian government and some armed groups such as the nationalist azov battalions aydar right sector terrorized ethnic russians in lugansk donetsk to such an extent that they were forced to respond to it as a result of almost civil war broke out

. it's a pity, people are lying, take it. oh, ah-ah-ah, oh-oh-oh, oh, vasenka, oh, poor oh mom, it was inside the ukrainian conflict, then russia intervened diplomatically and together with germany , france in the so-called normandy format were looking for a diplomatic solution to the problem. i think that russia was honest and wanted to achieve implementation of the minsk-2 agreement so that donetsk and luhansk receive autonomy. this would prevent further confrontation. but ukraine , apparently, did not want to fulfill its obligations, and in this it was supported by germany, france, which also unfairly performed

its functions. as a result, 14,000 people died. we must clearly understand this. 14,000 people died because the ukrainian government did not want to fulfill what promised to fulfill countless small boxes here too. it was a ukrainian problem before russia recognized the independence of luhansk donetsk, a separate problem is the expansion of nato to the east. it was done in a very hypocritical way. in fact. nato was created as a defensive alliance a in 1992 , there was no longer any reason for its existence

by this time the soviet union and the organization of the warsaw pact countries no longer actually existed ; why does nato continue to exist, we are told the alliance pererossov political association, and now it is not only military in nature. but then it's also unclear. why is nato expanding to the east as a military alliance and why is nato violating the treaty on conventional armed forces in europe, which helped to achieve a strategic balance of power nato's behavior in the nineties and two thousandths. it was more and more destabilizing not only for russia but also for the whole of europe, as a result, the alliance was transformed from a defensive one into an alliance that performs offensive actions. everyone is talking about the fifth article of the nato charter of collective self-defense, but all nato wars began according to the fourth article,

according to which, after consultations, the alliance can decide that someone is a threat, respectively, nato can deal with him, kosovo was the fourth article there. it was not a defense against nato, no one attacked. there is no doubt that russia opposed nato expansion from the very first day, you just need to read the transcripts of telephone conversations between then russian president boris yeltsin and former us president bill clinton in order to understand that this is not vladimir putin's problem, this is russia's problem. i want to clearly understand your idea. nato expansion, because now i see nothing in it but humiliation for russia, what do you want to achieve with this, if russia is your partner , people ask about it, and i also ask what you want to achieve with this, we need a new european security structure. they are those old people in central europe who believe in themselves boris they understand that it would hurt you a lot if they suddenly

ended up in nato in an instant but they don’t know what will happen with russia if you leave russia has always cared about nato expansion and has always seen it as a threat to russian security and russia has voiced these concerns on numerous occasions but they have been ignored over and over again nato has continued to expand from the very beginning. we see that nato and the us are behaving disrespectfully to the russian laws of security interests, which are rooted in yalta and tehran and to what stalin told roosevelt and churchill about the importance of the soviet union to its interests. shake germany passed through poland twice in the same century, and russia doesn't want that to happen again. these are not putin's inventions, these are russian preoccupations that have historical roots the united states triumphed after the collapse of the soviet union we won the cold war were the winners and russia was the loser and we

treated russia as defeated we sent people there not to help her, but, to use it if you look at the prerequisites for the emergence of the oligarchic class in russia if you look at the corruption that arose in in the late soviet union, this became possible as a result of the implementation of economic policies by the united states and the west from the very beginning , we saw that the west had its own vision of russia to keep the country in a weakened state, politically and militarily since 1996. we praised the presidential election with the fact that we bought the russian elections the united states praised with the fact that we went to russia and did everything to steal the elections for boris yeltsin if anyone wants to talk about interference and elections, then i present to you attention to the 1996 elections in russia and the role of america

in them. okay, not about that now, when yeltsin left , vladimir putin came to his place, and here we saw indignation from the united states because we realized that russia had chosen a leader who would not continue the previous politics politics of boris yeltsin i try to stick to historical facts and our reality is there is a connection between these two things i got into government service at a time when the soviet union was the main threat we and my fellow military officers were focused on the problem of the soviet union as well as people in the state department. we treated the soviet union as an enemy, our motto was know the enemy as yourself, so we studied russia. i studied the history of russia, i plunged into it without

a trace. i studied russian, but i didn't do well. okay. i'm not a very good linguist, but i tried to look. i came to the soviet union in june 1988. many americans do not understand what was happening at this time in june of the eighty- eighth year, the entire union conference was held . communist party of the ussr if you know mikhail gorbachev if you know the history of perestroika gorbachev then changed the very essence of the soviet system from old-style communism, he made a new presidential form of government and gave power to the supreme soviet and so on. i understand this because i was there when it all happened. i've been following all of this. i understand the essence of the last years of government. gorbachev's main idea of ​​perestroika, including in all directions. political reform economic reform multinational states. i dragged. well, i think that's

what we are now so dealing with this reality, what is our country? i think our people still do not understand that they are losing their country. there will be no country. i understand what happened when yeltsin became the head of the country, because i have this knowledge. this is my information. i use them to form my current point of view, the people who advise the us government today do not have this knowledge. we're talking about michael mcfall. we're talking fiona hill i called them putin spellcasters they are people who were focused on studying the soviet union and russia, not for the purpose of understanding it, but for the purpose of using it to their advantage of economic interests. and when putin took over russia, these people , instead of trying to understand, the reasons that led to the emergence of such a president

, they began to attack him, they began to call him an autocrat, a dictator, a kgb officer, these are ignorant people. and those who advise our government today. these are the same people who work in the media as well. this is a very good and difficult question, united states. unfortunately, this is a nation that does not understand the importance of history. we talk a lot about it, we talk about the founding fathers, about our constitution, about abraham linkon , about the emancipation from slavery, the first world war, and the democracy of alente. lisa roosevelt, we say different things, but we do not understand what they really mean and what is the real story. i will give you one example, the united states of america and the soviet union along with great britain france and others

allies fought against nazi germany - this is a struggle in which we collectively won together. but when you start to study it in detail. you will find out that the soviet union made the greatest contribution to this. and that without the soviet union , victory would not have been guaranteed, and he sacrificed so much for this victory, so many so many that we can’t even name the exact number of dead 22 million, 27 32 37 million. who then lived knew it, but no, they respected it, they understood it, they saw it. and you can read the transcripts of the yalta conference to see that roosevelt understood this, understood these victims, but when was the last time the united states celebrated victory in europe when was the last time we had a parade in honor of our heroes. we also sacrificed a lot for the victory over nazi germany, we no

longer celebrate it, as if we had forgotten it and moved on russia has not forgotten. i lived in the former soviet union, votkinsk, and i saw these monuments to these heroes. and every may 9, i saw a march in the streets the immortal regiment with photographs of those who gave their lives people honored their tradition of victory russia has not forgotten this and should not forget what was done to it. i think that the russian people understand better the threat that any possible resurrection of neo-nazi ideology carries, especially in the neighboring slavic country, the united states, we are again very superficial in history. we say some things, but do not understand what they really mean you have become so passionate about the confrontation with russia that we do not see reality, for example, ukraine is a very interesting moment. most people don't know that during the second world war there was a twelfth department of the general staff of the

german army. he worked in the east. it was led by a general named gelem at the end of world war ii. he was captured by the united states, but denocified to put him in jail so that he could no longer be a threat to anyone. we took him into our service along with his entire organization, because he had a spy network on the former occupied territories of the soviet union, including in ukraine, where a guy named bandera and other nationalists continued to resist the soviet union and from the forty-fourth to the fifty-fourth years. there was active resistance for 10 years, then about 300,000 people died, 300,000 people lost 100,000 lives. of these, 200,000 were poles, a mixture of russians and ukrainians, and almost 40,000 soldiers of the red army died. it was a serious fight. and it

was the americans who funded the cia. we financed them we supported them the cia declassified, the documents of which describe in detail the relations of the organization. elena and stepan bandera also say that the united states of america financed anti-soviet resistance through organizations such as the ukrainian insurgent army and the like in order for them to resist in the territories of the soviet union until 1954. after the military resistance was broken, we continued to finance the bandera movement so that he could continue his political activity not only within the soviet territory, but in other places where migrants left canada, the usa and other countries. and this funding continued until 1990. therefore,

the thesis that we did not know anything about the real state of affairs of the bandera movement is simply an absurdity of the highest degree in 2014. we helped politically resurrect the bandera movement. we brought him to the maidan and used it as a weapon against yanukovych and we overthrew the laws of the elected president. they replaced it with a revolutionary movement dominated by neo-nazis. we are it we knew we knew so much that the us congress in 2015 voted for a law under which these nazis cannot be trained because they are terrible people the us congress recognized that the azov battalion and its derivatives from nazi organizations that cannot be funded by the us but our hatred for russia not love for her and fear of putin made us forget it and made us

support these people, the american media used to honestly talk about the base back in 2019, the mainstream media said that ukraine exists problem with nazism. but today, if i tweeted that i was blocked that there is a nazi problem in ukraine, i would be blocked for disinformation by anyone who looks at the tattoos on the hands of those who were just captured at azov steel, you know what's the truth that is not just a problem with the nazis , the nazis dominate ukraine. it's a complex issue. especially for an ex-military who was trained from the very beginning to kill his enemies and no questions should arise on this subject. with every state but as soon as you ceased to be my enemy. you

raised your hands, you gave up or you were injured or immobilized, my duty is to take care of you. i can interrogate you with questions. you're a prisoner of war, but i care about you. i'm giving you the same medical care that i would give to my wounded marine. i give you the same food as i give my marines, and i give you blood . i am required to do so by international law. not only because we were taught that. we fight like that and we believe in it new old guys. and so when i see stories like this coming from ukraine where soldiers trained by the americans are supposedly committing atrocities against russian soldiers. it hurts me. to the very heart. this is an unverified video. we live in the age of propaganda. we must admit this, because this war is very full of propaganda.

especially on the part of ukraine, they have become real masters of the information war against russia, and russia is losing this war. i say, as there are ukrainian fighters at the beginning of azovstal. every single one laid down their arms and surrendered, no one was left on the territory of the industrial zone, demining began from the point of view of america russia does not present itself very effectively in the information space, and the ukrainians work with the americans. they have specialists from the cia of the european union mi-6 information about the evacuation of ukrainian defenders. azovstal, the pages of the world media still do not converge. under what conditions it was possible to withdraw part of the military from there. and what will happen to them further, our colleagues understood this. let's get a look material on the night of monday to tuesday, 53 seriously wounded ukrainian defenders were evacuated from the territory of azov and were taken to the hospital on the vaz. and another 211 soldiers were delivered through the humanitarian corridor,

the ukrainian command decided to withdraw the military in order to save their lives. the ministry of defense reported that they did not fully fulfill all the tasks set by the command and the best propagandists in the world. it's the american mainstream media that's just flooding the american european markets with information that's fake, incorrect misleading, which is distorted not only in relation to ukrainian successes in one russian failures. the failure of russia is not that the russians are losing, but the ukraine is winning the battles. they say that russia is a terrible terrible country. whose army entered ukraine and does terrible things to ukrainians there, they wear, they steal, they rob, they kill, people who hear this see the russian soldier as a non-professional, but an animal, therefore, when a story appears that the ukrainian military torture and kill captured russians. soldier the mainstream media in the us mostly

ignores that we just don't hear about them to learn about it. we need to look deeper to purposefully look for this information. therefore, if you think that you will hear something like this in the american media, then you are mistaken, but some videos were so terrible that it was impossible not to show them, but they justify them as follows: ukrainians do not see russian soldiers as people, they rather see in them criminals and murderers terrorists people who do not deserve protection, according to the geneva convention. unfortunately, some americans believe this. let's say that a russian soldier, for example, was a rapist, murderer and thief. he committed these crimes, it would be my duty if i took him prisoner, feed him, take care of him, take him into custody, hand him over to the court. according to the law on those nar. in which he is accused and he should have been given the opportunity to defend himself in court. i

do not use the presumption of guilt and do not shoot him or torture him. that is, even if you want to believe everything that is said about russia, this still does not justify what they are doing with the russians, today's confrontation is a struggle between nato and russia for the future of russia, this is not about defeating russia in ukraine, this is all in order to be so strong and it hurts so much to hit russia so that russia can no longer launch a single military operation in europe that would threaten european countries. i don't make up those words. this is what us officials say publicly when this conflict started. the us was already providing ukraine military assistance in a few. hundreds of millions of dollars annually, we trained the

ukrainian military, provided them with non-lethal weapons, vehicles and lethal weapons, namely jivelin missiles, new javel missiles . good ones can knock out tanks on them, and the old ones, for example, those released with ninety-six and not upgraded are not very good. we give ukraine these old missiles and most of them do not work and they are not very effective. i think that the ukrainian government does not say anything about this, because they do not want to offend, the united states then we say that we should give them more help. we don't give them the best weapons. we give them old ifvs from the vietnam war. i don't think they have specialists who can fix the engine. if something breaks, they are not very good equipment and they will not last long on the modern battlefield, as far as galbi are concerned. m. three sevens they are normal, but this is not the best gun in the world.

they are difficult to use and have a significant impact on the battlefield. they don't either bring. and now we come to the root of the problem. the united states provided ukraine with weapons worth 53 billion dollars in the first year, the budget of the russian ministry of defense for 2021 was in the region of 43 billion. for the first 4 months of the conflict. we gave ukraine $10 billion more in aid than russia spends on its entire defense in a year. even if this equipment is old, even if some of it doesn't work, it's extremely high and we even talk about providing newer weapons when we first started training ukrainians. everything took place in haste. we can say in a panic we trained their designers, some of them went. in the pocket of poland quickly trained came back. today , ukrainian soldiers are at nato bases in

germany poland and are trained for 40-60 days. this is a more in-depth training in handling more modern weapons. and this weapon gets to the front line. and it can no longer be said that it does not have any influence on the course of the battle. one of the goals of the united states was to enable ukraine to kill as many russian soldiers as possible. i am i don't know how many of them have already been killed, but i know that some of them are definitely being killed and they are being killed by the theme with the weapons that we provide. and when you give $53 billion worth of weapons, you end up with a lot of russian soldiers killed , or at least there is such a prospect, so the answer to your question is yes, in the united states they are pursuing the goal of making the conflict continue. as long as possible, but there is one more aspect that we need to discuss, not only in

weapons, but also in intelligence. the united states and nato have very good intelligence capabilities without any consequences from russia because we are not involved in the war with russia. so we collect this information and pass it on to the ukrainians. and it allows them to do things that otherwise wouldn't be possible. like, for example, shooting at russian ships and dragging equipment through those zones that russian intelligence does not cover and attacking with helicopters. russian tank farm on russian territory to carry out an attack on the russian military leadership, intelligence along with weapons create the lethality of the ukrainian army, which was not there when this special military operation began. this does not mean that russia is losing the war. this means that the price of victory will be. much higher. i think we can agree that

russia and the us are serious about their military operations. and that this is not a toy for them. this is a major operation. the one and the other. let's talk about iraq us army we went to war with iraq. this was not a special military operation. we went to war. this means that we took with us everything that we were able to carry away our enemy and glad. it was an enemy we had already defeated once in 1991 and for ten years. we did not allow him to rebuild his military machine, so it was very weak. army. we have made full use of our military capabilities in the full application of our military doctrine against a weakened enemy. let's look at russia, russia has very combat-ready armies. i don't think it appeals to anyone. questions russian military doctrine is serious. i don't want russian

came to me with their doctrine, but russia did not take all its power to ukraine, and at least in the beginning it acted in a way that was not consistent with its doctrine. in fact, even today, when russia pulled a lot of firepower. it's still not following her doctrine. this is a change of grant to the current situation. let's talk about the enemy now. russia is opposed by the second largest army in europe, the army, which for 7 years trained nato, the ukrainian army is well equipped. she has excellent command and good organization. she is well-trained and operating under a nato- like doctrine, so russia's world -class adversary. it's a huge difference between what the us did in iraq and what russia is doing in ukraine, there's

a huge difference, no comparison here and there can't be russia as an ethnically diverse country, you can go to the east of the country and see that non-ethnic russians live there. you can go to the caucasus and see people there who do not belong to the russian ethnic group and yet russia is a country where it is glorified. with russian culture, but it is much more tolerant of non-russian people compared to ukrainian nationalists, ukrainian nationalists are modern descendants of german nationalists who believe in the purity of the times. oh oh shit, that's

why they are committing a terrible crime against ethnic russians against ethnic poles against gypsies and so on. that's what the conflict is going on right now to ask why the kharkiv football club became anti-russian, like the russian-speaking population of kharkiv, how they moved away from russia and why they began to fill themselves with tattoos of adolf hitler and stepan bandera why did the russian-speaking residents of kharkov fill themselves with a tattoo of stepan bandera, this is a fair question. i don't think we're talking about a confrontation between two russias here. that certain diseases spread in ukraine, which allowed such an altered consciousness to germinate and metastasize, and it began to affect the whole of ukraine. thank you for

agreeing to talk with us. i hope that our contacts will continue and you have nothing to fear that you are talking to russians, although many either refuse or be afraid. new, apparently, a courageous person and free. all the best.

russian channels and all serials movies and cartoons educational programs and documentaries

hello for the first time in the special operation in ukraine we have a lot of questions for you. understandable reason for the president's interview. we have already seen the important part we did this point, but late sunday evening on the tv channel. russia main fragments, acute topic of recent weeks decision, what putin said about this and what else he said about what is happening on the battlefield of our system, dozens will be destroyed, answers to questions that

concern all systems they can and truckers about the most important topic in recent months. we know more than the rest works in the highest degree of efficiency. moscow kremlin putin watch on sunday at 22:00. vladimir putin commented on the us decision to supply ukraine with multiple rocket launchers this week. washington announced the allocation kiev of a new package of military assistance, which includes haimars and ammunition for them in an interview with the author of the program moscow kremlin putin pavel zarubin head