but we add, nor discount on smart devices, we complement the ideal ingredients. in one subscription , you already overpay at a bargain price, and the first connection is free with age, changes in vision can change the usual things. taufon was created to nourish the restoration and youthfulness of the eyes. taufon triple action for a clear look. and now the live broadcast on our colleague's channel came last night and this morning there are a lot of questions from the media regarding our reaction to the unprecedented decision that was taken by some members north atlantic alliance a and the decision that prevented the visit of the minister of foreign affairs of russia to the republic of serbia. and

of course the unthinkable happened. i understand the interest that you show in our assessment of these outrageous actions, but what happened, in general, was the deprivation of a sovereign state, but the right to pursue foreign policy. serbia's international activities have been blocked, at least for the moment in the russian direction. well apparently here we won't beat around the bush this is another very clear and instructive demonstration of how far nato can go to the european union, in using the most low-grade low-grade methods of influencing those who are guided by national interests and are not ready to sacrifice their principles of their dignity for the sake of the

very rules that the west instead of imposing international law, and if the visit of russia's ministerial homemade products to serbia is perceived in the west. as almost a threat of a universal scale, then, apparently, things in the west, uh, are very bad and vaughn the cries that have recently been heard about the need for serbia to make a final choice about what i heard yesterday, the former foreign minister was the former prime minister, and sweden's foreign minister. carl bild. he made loud statements that the worst thing that serbia can do in order to promote its european perspective is to accept the minister of foreign affairs of russia in belgrade how do you like this statement or, for example, the united states ambassador to belgrade, mr. hill, published here somewhere just a few days ago when

was announced during my visit to a large article, but under the name of the third is not given either east or west where exactly in such expressions and in such logic i talked about the prospects for relations between serbia and the united states with the european union and with the russian federation and well , here, in my opinion, even to the inexperienced observer. it will be clear that, uh, there is no place in brussels not only for the sovereign equality of states, which is enshrined in the charter of the united nations, but even for the notorious freedom of choice, which brussels constantly talks about. there is also no place, as it turned out during here are our last year's discussions. and when we proposed concluding a treaty on european security, offered the americans and nato members

, we were answered by no principles of the indivisibility of security, including the need for the inadmissibility of strengthening our security at the expense of others. nato will not accept, only the principle of freedom to choose partners. now this principle, which the west has erected at the forefront. the west itself trampled on serbia from the point of view. west there should be no choice no freedom of choice partners. well, in general, this is cynicism. e he er, hardly surprises us? uh, the west clearly makes it clear that it will press, not bending any of the most low-profile means and such hypocrisy. eh, it has already been shown to us several times. e, including e. during the tragic bombing of yugoslavia in 1999, those who believed in their victory in the

cold war and in their right to build the world exclusively according to their own patterns. it is this mentality that manifested itself in the events in the event that we are now discussing with you. i am i know that there will be many explanations in which we have not yet heard explanations, and the countries that refused to let the russian board overflight will say that they were ordered by the european union and nato, in turn, will say that these countries themselves made independent decisions. well, you know all this very well, but the main thing is not this. the main thing is that no one will be able to destroy our relations with serbia yes , very useful, timely meetings were planned with serbian president alexander vuchim

minister of foreign affairs. nikolay silakovich with the speaker of the parliament ivitsa dacha than with the clergy of the rural orthodox church. eh, and of course. and contacts would be very, very useful, but in any case, through all other channels , these contacts do not disappear, and we invited foreign minister nikolai silakovich to pay a visit to russia in the very near future . i hope that the plane on which he will fly a scheduled or special one will not be subjected to another shameful punishment from the outside. eh, who lost everything. uh, the propriety of brussels a and his e clients. and we were planning to consider, uh, a broad agenda, and we wanted to talk, of course, about the rapidly

developing co-strategic partnership in our bilateral relations, but we also wanted to talk about international affairs. and apparently. the brussels puppeteer really didn't want to once again give us a platform for us to state and reaffirm russia's position in the serbian capital on both the kosovo problem and the problem of bosnia and herzegovina. but they didn't want to. probably so that we expressed support for belgrade’s initiative to implement the open balkans project in the interests of improving the strengthening of relations between all countries of this region, but now it is obvious to all of us that they want to turn brussels, namely nato and the european union, the balkans into their own project called the closed balkans at least, it is difficult to draw any other conclusions against the background of

what we are now observing. and here's what i wanted to tell you, for sure. do you have any additional questions, please, i am ready to comment. murat gadzhiev please. not heard. now we hear, yes, we hear sergey viktorovich you answered most of what i wanted to ask, but, nevertheless. what measures will be taken to ensure that this meeting takes place and whether such measures will be taken by entrepreneurs, the second and second question. if possible, and now you yourself said an unprecedented step, because they have made three countries in a row closed their airspace , or there is a danger that this will now become the norm, that now ministers

from different countries will simply be closed here. uh, air country space in order to, uh, shield their fear. thank you. i think this is not something that will become the norm - it has already become the norm for the european union. and for nato, i brought you, uh, the noise that accompanied this decision, which was heard in the west in the media speeches of individual politicians. oh, yes, they are more and more afraid of the truth, there are more and more trying to escape into some kind of fictional fake reality that fills the screens of a social network with any information resources. and how do you know completely blocked on their own initiative all alternative media. uh, and uh, they want, uh, their, uh, electoral task

to be solved by duping their voters. and if such a choice was made, and i have no doubts that the choice is worth it in this, then brussels decides that it will decide the fate of all european countries once again shows what it really costs, the one whose status is being sought, and the applicants to join the european union a and e, c. in general, i explain a very simple candidate, how it has been repeatedly stated, including by the militant josep barel, who demands that the ukrainian situation be resolved exclusively on the battlefield in order to defeat russia, the candidates, as he emphasizes, are obliged to follow holyly at the stage of preparatory preparation for membership . fully unquestioningly european

policy in the field of security and defense, which, as everyone knows, is sharpened to the utmost in an anti-russian vein. that's the whole answer that awaits those countries that, but are trying to find, but a balance of interests in the context of maintaining their relations, e and with the european union of developing relations with the european union and with those countries that are not members of the european union. we very much appreciate serbia's courageous stand in this regard. uh, personally president aleksandar vučić, who emphasizes that he will not engage in anti-russian activities, but the european union wants exactly this. he wants exactly that, uh, all candidates take on obligations of a russophobic nature, but the situation has certainly shown what it's worth. membership

of montenegro and north macedonia in north atlantic alliance and why does nato need such countries, they need it solely to , uh, punish russia in order to expand the anti-russian foothold in europe and create, uh, threats and create mechanisms, as i said, containment is not at all something, but what require article ten of the washington treaty on the establishment of the north atlantic alliance , which, as we quoted not so long ago, but assumes that the new members. first, they must meet the criteria. and secondly, the most most importantly, they should bring added value to the alliance in terms of strengthening the security of all its members. well, what kind of security i'm looking for? security was strengthened by montenegro, north macedonia but, as a tool to contain

russia, as well, you know, i sang along with the big uncles, they coped with their role quite well. i feel sorry for these countries. these are two people friendly to us with beautiful nature and a wonderful history, which uh, they uh, honor and uh appreciate our relations in the past. uh, but the current current political realities, of course, put these countries these peoples are in a very unenviable position. well, yes, as far as. answers e. you know, we, uh, will never undertake something that further complicates relations between peoples, this is what our western partners are doing. er, they're getting into more and more trouble at home, not only because they're putting the socio-economic situation in their countries in

a very serious rut, but also because more and more intelligent people in europe are starting to wonder. why make russia an enemy more and more and more people, but remember. uh, like shared with many european countries. we performed very, but the great and, uh, proud. speaking of glorious history, about history, and probably here. i, uh, also want to return to the failed visit to serbia. and i had, among other, uh, events , a grand ceremony planned. ah, visiting. e, the eternal flame in memory of the liberators of belgrade, where the recording was to take place. uh, in the book, honorable guests. i planned to write the following text and now you think that i

i convey to the serbian people we will be worthy of the memory of the soviet and yugoslav soldiers who fell in the fight against fascism serbia and russia are in solidarity in efforts to preserve the truth about the history of the second world war, we will not allow the revival of nazism. please consider this my message to all those who visit. majestic monument in belgorod serbian news agency tanyuk, please yes tanyuk , serbia dear mr. to visit serbia, that is, they banned, uh, the passage of your plane into the airspace of three countries, what was the reason for this? does this mean that you will be obstructed on any other route in the eu and nato countries,

or only this applies to a visit to serbia, say thank you very much. you know i uh can't guess about other routes about other countries if nato has any plans, uh communication doesn't exist at the moment. uh, i have an invitation from other countries, and which are from those countries that are part of nato now at the moment. no. i don't expect anyone in moscow either, uh, well, as for the reason, well, the reason was discussed in the serbian press, uh, for several days. uh, back then, in the croatian press and in the press of other countries of the western balkans , there was such a version, for example, that lavrov is now one of the most unwanted guests in serbia, because he decided to get ahead of olaf schols, who is literally going to the balkans, a these

days, and shel was allegedly very dissatisfied and even offended. and what did serbia decide on such as him i leave it as an impolite step on the conscience of those analysts who write such things , i think that this is humiliating not only for those people whom they describe, but i am looking for a reaction. they are trying to predict. this is humiliating, first of all, for the media themselves, which, in this kind of exercise, are trying to find additional readers or viewers. serbian newspaper courier please good afternoon, the battle has been transferred to petrushevich courier, dear mr. minister, taking into account the fact that from the very beginning of the conflict on ukraine serbia is under pressure from both sides. but essentially in connection with those events with which it has no connection. will

russia, unlike individual western countries, have more understanding of the national interests and position of serbia thank you very much, of course, yes? we see how frenzied the west is reacting to what is happening in ukraine, which only proves our rightness, the rightness that we presented to the whole world by explaining. why did a special military operation begin and after showing retrospectively for many years one decade of our efforts to prevent the creation of threats not somewhere in 10,000 km, but from the russian federation right on our borders. they explained that if the united states considers itself entitled today to declare that belgrade poses a threat to some kind of world security for

european security and tomorrow they start bombing belgrade, then in a couple of years they decide that another country located in those 10,000 km from the united states and cancer poses a threat to them the lands of the city are erased hundreds of thousands of civilians are killed, and then more decide that in libya, too, across the atlantic ocean. there is such a country, libya, which is for the united states well, it’s simply necessary, but it poses a threat that must be destroyed, but our explanations are long from the inadmissibility of nato’s advancement, they are admissibility, and support for a coup d’état in ukraine is the admissibility of sabotage by both poroshenko and zelensky of the minsk agreements that were achieved with such difficulty all these warnings as well as warnings of nato moving right up to our borders.

they were simply ignored when the russian people continued to be subjected to complete discrimination in ukraine. uh, and when laws were passed banning the russian language, when the nazi order of the theory and practice of nazism was imposed, and the west applauded all this, presenting the whole process to the world as an achievement of real democracy, and at the same time continued to support neo-nazi. uh, the armed forces of ukraine in their uh, daily shelling of civilians of civilian infrastructure in the donbass, we have no other choice. i am in detail said. i'm just reminding you now, but you know, uh, the brussels line in the balkans and the ukraine . uh, it's essentially the same. only in the balkans does the

european union favor those who infringe on the interests of the serbs, while in ukraine nato and the european union support a regime that has long declared war on everything russian. and here is a very interesting observation. i already mentioned it when i was interviewed by the media from bosnia and herzegovina, it lies in the mediation efforts of the european union here in the balkans after kosovo every referendum unilaterally declared its independence, uh, some process began, the european union was invited by the general assembly to mediate between pristina and belgrade. here he mediated quite successfully in 2013, an agreement was reached . the building of the community of serbian

municipalities of kosovo and in 2014, when the coup took place and the operation of the so -called anti-terrorist forces in ukraine against the donbass against the russians began minsk agreements, and which also established certain rules for serbian municipalities in kosovo and for donbass, the european union solemnly promised to support the special status of both north kosovo and eastern ukraine , the status, which consisted of not very difficult things , firstly, to allow people. speak your native language serbian in serbian russian in ukraine in russian. allow them to teach children in

schools in their own language, allow them to use this language in everyday life and to allow some autonomy in matters of law enforcement and in matters of economic ties with neighboring regions in the event of a slope with the north. kosovo serbia in the case of the east of ukraine with russia are absolutely identical to the agreements aimed at respect for national minorities in full compliance with international european conventions, and on the rights of such groups of people, in both cases, the european union solemnly proclaimed that it had achieved success and in both cases, the european union failed shamefully and was forced to. it was by recognize the essence of the matter, saying that he cannot persuade kiev to comply with the minsk agreements. and that he cannot persuade pristina to comply with the agreements that were

concluded with belgrade, so there is something in common between how the eu approaches various uh regions of our common geopolitical space. what goals does the european union pursue and to what extent is the agreement with it able and capable? tv channel russia 1 aleksey petrov i beg you good afternoon aleksey petrov weighs these russia 1 you have already started talking about ukraine i i would like to develop this topic in the context of turkey. moreover , your visit there was announced. what role, in your opinion, can turkey play in the issue of normalizing the situation around ukraine, especially since it claims to be such an intermediary platform. how promising is the format that was initially formed with the ukrainian side and subsequently was torpedoed by ukraine itself, and finally. what is your position? what is your assessment of ankara's position

regarding the possible entry into nato of sweden and thank you finland, well, the last question. i won't even comment. this is a sovereign matter. ankara, as from any other country that is part of one or another alliance, unions of the organization, and here i am. you heard one of the zealous members of the european union , in my opinion, and they demanded from the baltic states, when the sixth package was being discussed, the so-called sanctions against russia was demanded to deprive hungary of the right to vote, because she was abusing the rule of consensus. but this is just a paradoxical statement consensus means only one thing that everything for if someone alone is against, then there is no consensus, so no one can speak against it.