naturally, the opportunity for which the serbs provided would be provided in full. uh, the main thing is, uh, is it really about thoughts? she was the key to our minister of foreign affairs, assessing this as an influence attempt. uh, the west influence. uh, in this case, to restrict serbia's foreign policy and international activities. in this case, in the russian direction, in the same way, president vučić evaluates this in the same way, saying that despite such provocative actions, and behind the outrageous decisions of the three neighboring serbia country. we understand that we are worth it, but to influence the forces in the west of brussels is quite obvious and vicious. in connection, he warned that

this is not further blackmail, he, of course, expects pressure and, first of all, so that serbia turns out to be, here are the positions of not joining the anti-russian world, and he stressed that this will not happen. in this case, he emphasizes that serbia will retain its neutral position and, in part of russia, will continue to cooperate with russia, uh, on all directions without any, uh, exceptions, uh, this was discussed. when we talked with him, this was recorded in a statement by the presidential administration based on a report from the presidential administration following our meeting of the heated conversation yesterday. and uh, he voiced the same thing in the evening. uh, the president is puffy very publicly on tv. e. here it is accepted with great

pleasure and expectation that sergei viktorovich lavrov invited the minister of foreign affairs silakovich to visit russia, which will make this visit already the president has given instructions for preparation this visit. so in any case, despite this kind of provocations hindering the development of dialogue from our relations and uh, interaction in specific areas is impossible. we are sure of this and one more thing. i want to emphasize that here is the west, the european union, yes, and washington, which at every step speaks of its desire and desire to restore the stability of cooperation on the beams, to reconcile all states, to bring them to some unimaginable level of mutual understanding.

actually. and this is an example of this, uh, makes absolutely the opposite, because that's what these countries forced. and this is precisely how to take a similar step in relation to serbia in this case, and in relation to serbia, of course, as we all understand, it does not improve relations between serbia and its neighbors. what kind of interaction? what kind of consent , reconciliation and e political interaction can we talk about when it is driven in in this way? a wedge or wedges between countries located, as the european union says in the region of the western balkans and one more point already concerning your own serbia, you you can't imagine what indignation at the actions of the west e. e among the serbian public, what has

begun? uh, here sergey viktorovich was waiting for him very much. he is very popular on authority, but in serbia he would be here. naturally, the backdrop would have been absolutely amazing and events were being prepared by people preparing, troubles without any instructions. uh, in support of russia, in support of the minister of foreign affairs of our leadership of the president of the russian federation, and, of course, these mass actions. they would accompany the visit in this case as well. uh, the eu should also be aware of this. it would be thought that such actions are, well, just an attempt to humiliate serbia and the serbian people. they do not benefit the credibility and rating of the european union itself in serbia alexander arkadyevich will even anticipate my questions. i then

ask what, and the fantasy of analysts. if it is possible, so to speak, they have reached the point that they do not want to see lavrov, as if to see scholz's visit right up to mm and uh, when there may be a visit from vuchie. what is known about this? it is known, first what we know specifically your obedient servant knows and the media from some conversations, what is called a leak, also that there was discontent from berlin, but i repeat no one as official information. i, uh, did not provide this information, so i say caution with the proviso that this is a mass media. er, well, what is the fact and what is the most important thing here? this is what serbia is like at the very beginning, and it was already some

time ago, the date of the visit was determined there and back. yes you visit the sixth on the seventh of june. as the very fact that serbia, with great pleasure, immediately accepted with great readiness the intention of sergei viktorovich to visit serbia, all this remained no hesitation, not a moment of doubt. we did not catch, along the way, the preparation of the visit. the visit was carefully and consistently prepared, and, once again, i tell you that there were no real impressions of serbia's alleged or any hesitation. this is honest - this is the fact that this is a reality that was and now could it be that just the same is the intent of the host. yes , such an expectation of our visit, just the same, led to the fact that, accordingly, western partners in quotation marks essentially thwarted it. i think that

this question was answered yesterday in my statement in the best way. uh, sergey viktorovich lavrov already answered when he said that things are apparently bad, uh, in europe in the west, when they resort to such unscrupulous worlds. and this is true, and i want to add maybe one such external element of a possible picture. unfortunately possible pictures, but she would be er, really. uh, the contrast between how sergey viktorovich is greeted here in serbia and on the next visit of schultz would be, uh, on the face it would be very bright and natural in favor of the russian federation ah, do you think the current incident is such pressure from neighbors, yes, in let's put it in quotation marks, but will it affect the relationship between moscow and belgrade? i already

answered above in no way affect. we continue our relationship. we are moving forward. we, uh, now we are completing the preparation of the reception for on the occasion of the day of russia yes, we wanted to hold it with the participation of sergei viktorovich lavrov, but we will hold it today, we are waiting for the leadership of serbia at the reception to join us we will celebrate this holiday together solemnly, as before, and mass and e relations about the planned visit foreign minister nikolai silakovich in russia, i have already said that we are moving forward, despite the steps that they are trying to put on us. thank you very much, despite the fact that they are trying to put spokes in the wheels in the diplomatic in a sense,

diplomatic relations continue between serbia and russia, and hmm, good-neighborly relations with us, alexander arkadyevich botsin was in touch. kharchenko ambassador of russia to the republic of serbia and now let's listen to an interview with the minister of foreign affairs. transnistria there were regular provocations. the interview was recorded just half an hour ago. new dangerous provocations continue in transnistria according to the latest information, the drone dropped two explosive devices, presumably according to the investigative committee. transnistria - these are rgd-5 grenades on the territory of the peacekeepers' fleet. uh, there are no casualties and no destruction. however, the incident is certainly very loud and we , uh, will discuss it with the minister of foreign affairs of the pridnestrovian moldavian republic, vitaly ignatius vitaly viktorovich, can you hear me? hello tell us, please, about what

happened in the area of ​​​​the settlement of vladimirovka, right. everything happened there. here we are, no further than last week we talked with you and you did not rule out the possibility of new provocations in transnistria apparently, this is exactly how it is. yes, unfortunately that's right, but provocations and such tourist acts of sabotage continue. here is june 5th. it was sunday early morning, uh, an unidentified drome dropped two grenades to guess. this is rgd-5 on the territory of the vehicle fleet of the reserve unit of the peacekeeping contingent, transnistria, which are deployed in the village of vladimirovka, fortunately. uh, there are no casualties, there are no casualties, but the military equipment itself received partial damage, the destruction there is not critical, of course, it is in such capable state. but these are certainly very disturbing elements, i note that this settlement is located quite close to the territory of

ukraine, of course, our investigation team is working, but apparently the signals and signs that we have already identified indicate that most likely this flying object also arrived from the territory of ukraine that is, it is a diversion. quite possible. it is possible and very likely, and in fact, apparently, not the first. yes, and previously studied similar assumptions. we know, that the republic has a yellow level of terrorist danger and a whole series of terrorist attacks. i'll bring some to the building of the ministry of state security. yes , near the military unit near the village of parkany. tower e, radio telecentre near the village of mayak e, how can i comment? maybe you can name more well, in fact, on april 25-26, the first tourist acts of the most resonant kind took place, but the dropping of explosive devices from drones resembles the actions that were

carried out in the village of parkany. there, too, on the territory military unit tried to throw an explosive device fortunately. also, no one was hurt. that is, at that time we established. and that the traces also lead to ukraine, but we had another terrorist attack on may 13th. exactly in this direction , active work was carried out. we detained one of the performers. it was an attempt to set fire to the military registration and enlistment office. and there, uh, the perpetrator testified that it was an organized group, uh, which was supervised and directed by representatives of the special services of the republic of moldova. as you know the pridnestrovian side officially appealed to moldova with a call to cooperate in order to establish all the circumstances of the case. maybe his leadership is not aware of any individual actions of certain representatives of the special services, they invited representatives of the prosecutor general's office of moldova so that they could work transparently with the case materials to help us, obviously

they have some information, but unfortunately so far. i remember. it was may 13th we didn't get positive to this taoist side one gets the feeling that chisinau is not just refusing to cooperate and to help us establish all the details of this terrorist. fact and sabotage are the qualifications for these acts, but also, uh, we heard accusations from the leadership. moldova, in particular, the speaker of the moldovan parliament that they say - these are the russian special services. the pridnestrovians themselves do this, so the situation is quite tense, as we can see, there is a certain threat practically for pridnestrovie from both sides. that is, he refuses. yes moldova to help with investigations of provocations and , uh, a complete misunderstanding on this side. i understand correctly, they do not go forward in any way. no, no, moreover, i’ll note that, according to my information, my counterpart, practically a representative of the young , is currently on a rather long visit to romania, that is, apparently, the

romanian direction for chisinau is the highest priority hmm what else could be hmm difficulties, maybe the last recently arises here in relations with moldova, what is called maybe questions of energy resources questions of drug supply. what are the difficulties and problems here? well actually the problem remains relevant and acute it is clear that there is a global turbulence. there is a crisis. there are difficulties with logistics with the delivery of goods. and goods. our main problem is the most acute humanitarian one. this is the supply of medicines . the issue is not resolved. unfortunately, the moldovan country missed literally one of the cargoes, that is, the truck that was there from medicine for more than 2 months. he was finally released, but the mechanism itself, in order to transfer it freely through the moldovan territory, received medicines . unfortunately, the moldovan country did not agree and did not put into effect, that is, the problem remains open, the moldovan side blocked the banking financial activity. and in fact. e, seeks to sell its electricity for the local

moldovan currency, which we cannot but use. we can't help but take it off the bill convert for purchase, there import and so on and so forth, that is actually. uh, electricity is sold for this not an equivalent exchange. this is her main problem. decide if chisinau wants to continue buying electricity at well, in my opinion, the most loyal prices. it was an interview with the minister of foreign affairs of transnistria recorded just half an hour ago, and now to another significant international topic. can the peacekeepers of the csd be involved in ensuring security in the liberated ukrainian territories, as well as in the donetsk and lugansk people's republics. here. uh, in particular, there is an opinion of the head of the state duma committee on defense, andrey karta sexual, he said on the sidelines of a meeting of the council of the parliamentary assembly in the dkb in yerevan and i quote that it cannot be ruled out that

peacekeepers and the country of the dkb will be in demand in the liberated territories of ukraine, donetsk and luhansk people republics. we are unlikely to agree that some nato countries, under the guise of peacekeepers, will try to get in there, end of quote. we will ask comment on this subject of nikolai nikolaevich bordyuzhu. e, secretary general of the dkb in 2003 2017 nikolai nikolaevich hello hello so is it possible to use e peacekeepers in the liberated territories in the dpr and lpr? if yes, under what circumstances? to begin with, the peacekeepers are ready, they have demonstrated their capacity for operations in kazakhstan, and i will say that of course they would work effectively, but there are certain conditions. the peacekeeping contingent of the dkb is intended to carry out an operation to separation of the parties, there are, as it were, two types of operations - peace enforcement and separation of the parties. so

, operations to disengage the parties can begin and contingents, peacekeeping forces can only be brought in if both opposing sides agree to the use of peacekeeping forces. i am deeply convinced that today, of course, ukraine will not give such consent, even if we start preparing such an operation, therefore. today, i think that the use of peacekeepers is ruled out and about the dkb, but in a conflict in ukraine, plus, you don’t forget that the decision of the collective security council, that is, the leaders of all the states that are members of the collective security council, can be made on the use of peacekeepers, and i doubt that under the conditions of sanctions of such political pressure such a consistent decision will be accepted, so i don’t think that today it is possible to use it as ingredients in ukraine if the

situation changes and the ukrainian side starts negotiations. this means we will be ready, actually negotiate then, not excluding the possibility that the peacekeepers may be involved. uh sounds in lnr. such an opinion, in particular, is given by the basin with reference to the actions of the people's militia of the lc andrey marochka, that in the future, e parts of the people's militia may enter the composition of the battery. rnr, as far as possible, right, expediently, the state enters, and not the military contingent - this is the first. the second is in the composition of the dkb, as a community of states that collectively ensures security is included or located, and sovereign independent recognized of the state is possible. and the acceptance of the dpr and lpr csto only if they are recognized by all state walking organizations, so

the shortest way for the e and the donetsk and lugansk republics to be under the umbrella of the utkb is joining the russian federation, which is less time- consuming shorter way and i think that it is the most in terms of security of these two and the education of both the dpr and the lc is the most effective. this is exactly what tass itself quotes from sides of the lpr. this will be, perhaps, after the referendum is held. uh, he says, uh, officer of the people's militia andrey marochka and we will become the territory of the russian federation . secretary general from dkb in 2003-2017. we talked about the possibility of using peacekeeping forces in the liberated territories of ukraine in the dpr and the lpr. it

was the fifth studio. see you.

intense shelling of donbas killed 10 civilians under the blows of donetsk gorlovka and senovataya makeevka volnovakha with the latest details from the republic, our special correspondent , top manager of vk vladimir gabrielyan, the tragedy

occurred while crossing the river on all-terrain vehicles. how to withdraw ukrainian grain this will be discussed in ankara during the visit of sergey lavrov ukraine does not participate in negotiations earlier in kiev they have already spoken out against the most convenient route through belarus and weather surprises from the far east to the russian plain in southern siberia frosts in yakutia thirty-degree heat, where else wait anomalies and what forecasts are given for central russia an investigation team flew to the place of death of the mixer general director of the vk vladimir gabrielyan and the director of the procurement company sergey merzlyakov to establish the exact picture of the incident on the bugrenitsa river in the nenets autonomous okrug. all the latest information about the tragedy was collected by my colleague aleksakhov. near the village of shoyna