a woman who immediately declared herself completely, therefore, if we even say a word to a baking sheet, then they will tell us yes, because we are against lgbt people against migrants quite right, that is, we are russian homophobes and differ from the president of brazil was samar the president was sonar wanted to give in the president for this meeting to attend america themselves so that he did not understand simply that there was a sonar called into question the electoral system of brazil can confirm the message the president is looking forward to they can attend three formulas of interested parties and other events, bright man leonidovich well , it is written marat thatcher well, listen, well, you can’t do that, well, this is some kind of shame. well, it was just some, all the more so, whose sarator is called a trump and the top, which are not a single european people. i didn't even choose. but

they are accused of departing from the values ​​​​and standards of the european union, what are the standards of the european union or is it better to immediately call the state department, call them to say, that’s a very interesting career from the theater stage, suddenly decided to tell you about my meeting with president of the russian federation listen, when i visited putin in sochi in 2007, there is just the same approach, right here, she was trying to achieve something. and now it turns out that this was the main tragedy of life, and now she is trying to swear allegiance to that germany in which she had the misfortune of inseparability. whose interests did she represent? this is such a complex issue in american foreign policy in domestic. yes, whose economics or

eastern interesting, probably tried to do it, how her listen to her this teacher betrayed well done to what i am leading the tradition of betrayal in everything vitaltovich to begin with, i will say briefly. i two that met. eh, the man himself, before she became germany in this sense, everyone already knew that she would be here two years later, maybe three, when she already was. a sharp change, that is, at the first stage, zero understanding of international problems, the scoreboard at the second stage is also not very young, it turns out then, but the transformation was still, uh,

obvious. so i mean that she was also led carried uh, it all worked. the system that was described colorfully and with such pathos. so, but you understand that what you are doing now at the beginning is essentially correct, but you didn’t get a five in political science for this. this is impossible by definition, and would be out of the problem in that i put the rule out. in this we are the principle of difference, dressed for a long time already as an institute and forming a business. no no. no, it hasn't gotten to that point yet. eh, right now it is a balloon system, which we supposedly came out of it. although in fact we were kicked out of there between us speaking, here uh. yes, i have seven direct

constellation of deans discussing, mostly discussing, allegedly in such a way as to change the magistracy, that is, a formal thing. they are also important, but this is not the most important thing, but the content of what is taught. here, it was introduced, and not only, but all of our political science, our textbooks are written here, based on the fact that you get 2 points for describing a young sailor with big legs. you are, in fact, uh, not democrats at all and do not know the value of democratic institutions at all some people. you have voters there who must do something about democracy now. she is the current system. here again. and why did you say supporters of the european union of jewish

democracy. and where is your starkevich? where is your porkhalin? they are already here all the time. there were times. now everyone is ready to provide them with stands like this, but they themselves . so, why am i that there were still in our country, if i hope there will be objective people, that is, as unbiased as possible ideologically, who, uh, said that ukrainization in general is the current ukraine - this is the concentration of current western politics in all its guises there, that democracy in ukraine in europe and democracy in america. that's just on that territory they defend european values ​​inside one bunker, democracy beyond the limit

. oh, i’ll also remember your favorite heroes there, there’s a zhanker or jean-michel, well, this is a girl, then in white. in yellow it's different. yes, that's enough. well, i can't right now to make me sound mother right away. ok then. we judge by external data, we are simple natural people, of course, and people with this in appearance , so next time we will come in a skirt made of banana leaves, or something, simple natural natural people will stop, don’t scare me with wording. so uh yeah. this one, probably today we will commemorate the fu, ukrainian part, you will definitely understand this arrestovich. yes he is great dokatno, then the reactor of the school, uh, these very presetaries

of the ministries of foreign affairs in the west of the state department, all sorts of presidents. what does he say badly? and what does he awkwardly answer? whatever he wants, whatever he wants. and no one kicks him out, or was there such a gordon dream, he cannot head the union of journalists of all western democratic countries. maybe they are quite suitable for all their articles? us, again, the people of the traditional classical school. uh, it may be surprising that the faculty of political science is connected with circus schools, but this is how it is now policy is set. why are you picking on? we must work in these realities to see this deep state, the depths and the people of the cherry blossom theory has been repeatedly discussed. well, what

really will fly can be called whatever you like, then the present is the present that is in politics, that the present is politics. and what is real uh, well, in the subject today what is not. yes, this is a very important question, because look, what are the principles of life for the street, ushers. i do not see the principles of the official will, the cases are caught. yes basically a liar. if he says he is a jew, how can he swear an oath on the bible well be a follower or that he dares to joke. so who is he talking about? what allows you to tell jones why they're coming when we don't understand? what are the principles behind this personality, what can we expect from him? we understand everything about putin we understand everything. erdogan we all understand to ask the dolphin. we understand their way of life. we understand that as people they are we understand, this is their scale of values. what scale

half the leaders of the european union have family values ​​there is no family there. what kind of religion is there no religion? we can predict their next move. yes, depending on what the tv program will be and for washington, and there are some values. let's consider them. uh, how about functions o quite right, so which name is which count. eh, and in what kind of costume they go, they said that no more of these decals were specially selected before them. don't wait. i need this long 16 performance society. here's what's happening in the world today, sort of neo-sadization, and world politics is going on at such a fast pace that just these, uh, artists of light and semi-light steps become presidents, because as you know, american israel is arranged by these two

states. they brought to power. zelensky here they are talking. well, i'll say this separately, if you don't, well, i'm not interested anymore, but israel is here, moreover, information. uh, for which i can’t vouch for the facts in my hands with documents, but e ether could tell you so, uh, the reptilians, when will they go, if yes they will go so this function people they perform functions er, large formations of state interstate cats exist on planet earth and whose interaction is world history and world politics in its current version. what is the meaning of the existence of the state? and the continuation of their existence, more or less prosperous, is what

development understands, but others also want the same, and there are boundaries between them, and development without expansion does not matter in life there is expansion, this is what many people liked to say, and in general, this is correct. so that stands still, he loses. if there is no expansion, then there is no difference, which grows fat , develops, which grows thin, dies, develops. i'm sure i don't need these very ones i need. what exposure. well, look, he is the united states in russia is not enough. they were exhibited to save us from all sides once under the soviet union, this is a compression of our expansion. so what is spain called? territorial expansion is not necessarily the soviet union did not expand terry, this is real from the time, but the second great patriotic war

war, yes world war ii , there was no territorial expansion, but half of the globe was put under control by the relevant institutions. etc. here, the united states . well, they have some kind of state there, you know? yes? here, well the same thing, the american empire exists. she completely surrendered to herself. e. e, this is the most europe as we know that personality does not play any role. yes, those whom you name are not, that's all they showed they play? no? yes, now, but then where is the decision center, because now with whom to negotiate. now now it is, by the way, so that's why the expansion of their country of their civilization. they call windows. you see, everything is fine, so the americans are really some kind of club eye. and what is the problem that uh nato uh expands this natural normal process of development of an advanced

civilization. moreover, for ours. but the fact that russia, from where here to russia, russia does not allow further e, expand and even claim to regain part of the corporal, this is bad. this, naturally them. that's what's there and these spiders that lead the whole process. e, but that mass of books exists of riddles, what, israel is masonic, but this is in the break is a cello shaft. this is known. they left it without. do not bypass everything world politics. today, in any case, the middle ages did not know the existence of the jews, so the forces of nature blamed all their troubles. well , you can resist now that, well, uh, the west , they now blame russia for everything, of course, absolutely

they see the hand of the trump kremlin behind everything. we them elected. yes sasha i’m answering directly to your question, it ’s also a mystery to me where these five six seven eight people are sitting, who uh make decisions and who move, uh, who are driven by these scholz ursuls and other uh, is it class interests, or is it national interest, but we understand that's wider than just the american national interest there - this is more than. uh, actually, the united states of america, some indians there or other mexications. no, it's something more. i don't know, but what is it, but is of course, what, and such people are sitting somewhere. we have it naked, that's what claims to putin that is, you can live a lot of claims i have. and the fact that he is now this conspirator. but

upstairs, sitting and openly showing themselves, they must sit down there somewhere and hide these conspirators. no one should see them , some mystical forces of parliamentary parties. these are all the scenery, all these, uh, mechanics. here the machinery is being smoked. should lead the audience to delight. is this a bitch, or vahtanghat? it depends on how it is there is no other. and so it is. what else are you missing? write ride. yes, something, and how did it happen that a fool is a fool, because this performance needs a fool. how did you assign channels like that? well, the real problems, he understands that fools have been chosen for the role of his counter-partners, so

he says, what should i talk to them with fools? give smart, and vladimir vladimirovich putin is simpler. yes, vladimir makes it easier. he says you first sergey viktorovich. you say yes, that's right, when a tragic actor the actor does not come to the circus as a zaine, but to the arena and must now yes, it’s hard for him. well, i don’t know , yuri nikulin the twins coped, but a separate separate great clowns, great drama and the church came, and not vice versa. but, on the contrary, whether he could have done this is another matter. so, i am making an answer to your interesting question. it takes a few hours. here, uh, let's go. exams to enter, probably on the nose i can't. this is

the first civilian underwater vehicle that was created in russia they are made in russia in skolkovo maybe absolutely anyone can get it for free . what, by the way, 99% of people also don’t know - these are cacti, you can stroke a cactus and touch it with this process, they can successfully distinguish the sizes of objects. well, friends? hello, you are so scary, i'm afraid of you. i want to reach the level where people can trust robots, the fourth industrial revolution will take place in our country. love

history of russia look in the application or on the site for free without registration.

the question is that we are somehow here before russia renounce this expansion. well, when you are already in a straight line, they say that we want you, and not only drive you into a bearish corner, but also destroy you. maybe directly declaratively open. moreover, you are still a conspirator putin, you are in full view here, and the coincidence of the two roles is to openly proclaim what we want in particular. e that repeatedly said that's all. you miss my ears, what 's left is enough. here we have foreign policy delays, in general, its appearance in public. we can

not destroy. now nato nato is our enemy, it speaks for itself, but the european union, we can try to split gouging additionally drive in customers. why oh why? i don't need? i can say this separately from the goal. first , answer the question. why, and then how than that at all? well, you are in any case you, then this is what i articulate than running. for this purpose, a hacksaw saw kudamskaya must be held by a hand, and this hand must be firm. you can destroy something. if only you are firm. you can't soft destroy tv so where do i go if our country? here

now, apparently, we have a special relationship with serbia there. yes, we can now defend serbia, we can take and break through a land corridor. we can completely solve the economic problems of serbia, behold, the surrounding orthodox countries spit on all decency that has ever existed and forbid the passage of our foreign minister. we can do some demarche. well, yes, there is rogozin’s phrase with the aroma of a visa and permission are not needed, but it’s still not possible to solve a specific measure, different sets of measures can be offered, well, actually the church history is the same political history. there is also a lot about it. no. no, we are not yet equipping ourselves to the level that nothing will work in a big country, self-sufficient, which no one is going to help. and everyone asks her for help , we can’t wait that first we will settle ourselves inside , then, uh, we’ll spend them sleeping somewhere , it will be good. no, no, when they lost their

inner unity and in expansion they lost everything longer, so that you argue not only with me. and with someone else. here i complete, then again this garden angels soft or mentioned scholz you care what he is, that he is from the whites aptly sgt gdr how well it goes was absorbed by the federal republic of germany according to all our country's name. uh, the soviet union then we are legal successor and so on. why are we not interested at all? fate, the territory of which the lands that were part of e, where - used to be the frg of the state duma, was, according to the constitution, an anti-fascist state in history. now, if the nazis were there in the positions of the frg, then they were expelled in the state duma. uh, by the way, in addition to all her other wonderful things,

she was engaged in search. these same former, nazis and so on. it was anti-fascist, and you are now and how is it that neo-nazism is flourishing in europe, fascism. dgr something destruction. well, let's have fascist states. uh, prussia is the cradle of militarism, germany, bilitarism and nazism is a different thing, any, big. why are russians that they are fighters? why the soviet union betrayed the gdr, not only when what i'm talking about, because they lost their name, this is another question. why now us accuses of all fair discipline, and we are something like snow and angels to the standards, kohl soon she began to remember her childhood, happy or unhappy years there. that's what you did c d d why are you watching 30 years? yes, what is more, the absorption of the gdr and not improved, e to

the level of the average frg e life of these territories. why do they vote differently your country is split? your country is not united, maybe we will issue these pretas. and the corresponding action. well, whoever blames us, although the most that now i will present claims to the netherlands that they forgot as soon as the russian tsar was against the rejection of belgium from her and said that this was against all principles. then the truth gave one of his generals a swell of fate, our policy is you yourself about this child you tell in the past that if i was there for sports or shooting, this is a crazy conversation. yes, i'm just saying, be sure to hang other good-natured, shoot regulators. yes, you yourself said that we do not have an inactive policy, so this should be abandoned. how do you refuse? yes you propose again a reactive policy. here are our

jet on schulz accuses. she says merge while you did. it's 30 years old. what's the answer when my actions once in 1989 drop a single claim? g. what in response , no complaints at all. they will not understand such a historical period at all. we are talking 30 years ago. this is no longer even a deep story for them, as from the tatars, pre-mongol, as they say, no doubt. yes, the only thing i will say is that at the end it is a farewell, i will talk about being shot and hanging. here the landing page said that the capitalists themselves will sell on a rope on which we hang them, an ingenious line, but these times are gone now they will not sell on a rope, because they know that if they sell it, we hang it on them, eat it or not, it has disappeared . yes, what are you supposed to hang here?

i said the quote is outdated already. by the way, i like something, why is it so important for me to understand? here are the people, in fact, they are still initially much smarter than the european american government that is chosen for them at the same time it is interesting that they tell him that it is putin who raises prices. putin raises prices, and even a number of commentators are already saying the guys got it. look, that's just over two years of biden's presidency. his lies are finally catching up with him. as the american economy collapses, gasoline prices rise australia beware all of us next, no one believes that vladimir putin or trump, or racism , or climate change, or whatever is not in trend, is to blame for all this. today i don't know, maybe by monkey people took off the rose-colored glasses blame the person who excuse me, i need to make a serious face of the person sitting in the oval office the problem

in the jabaid, the so-called intellectual bankrupt those who support him are intellectually bankrupt. all the elites, this is precisely the essence of the problem, please, let's start over, because i listened carefully to my colleague. i have three thoughts, including what the elite is and how to get into it, if suddenly someone is going, well, point one, how can i seems to be the whole history of mankind and especially it is connected with western europe from the collective west. the so-called stories of ideas are many of the things that seem unshakable to us. and almost there not sent by god in fact. once they were invented, but in the format of a certain intellectual model, it just happened. eh, it's fate that this has become commonplace and sometimes we do n't even know the authors of these same models. well, that is, let's say the concept of sovereignty. here we are now. for

example, we are talking about whether these are more sovereign states. this is a less sovereign state in washington since 2004, there is a so-called peace fund, which is from the sovereignty of countries, and actually the concept of the famous fail states, which today is recognized as not politically correct, we must say frigil states, fragile states. this is their creativity and, again, all concepts are used, but not everyone knows that these are specific people who once came up with this. that's exactly the same in the xviii century in the shermantov came up with a system of checks and balances. and it seems to me that this one is on what built a modern smell, that is, not only the division, but namely the power of the state to the executive legislative judiciary. this is, as it were, half the trouble, and the second, as it were, part is that the elite diverges into different categories, which is why there is no single decision-making center in fact . it seems to me that this is intended, because there is an elite of money, there is a ruling elite

, there is a bureaucratic elite, there is a creative elite, and yes. closely related, but still different categories of people. that is why it is very curious let's say. now, if it was possible to measure the effectiveness of decision -making based on the results with some kind of magical device. well, the conditional america summit . here is the one that is taking place in los angeles, and here is what happened last week in june, and when the bilderberg club met, because these are such informal associations. elites who do not produce any resolutions. they do not give interviews to the press at the end of all this, but let's say the format, but of the tripartite commission, but of the one created at the time georgian or belderberg club from the point of view that we have such an over-concentration of elites in one place is much more representative. than, for example, some kind of general assembly or joint, and where it is

generally represented, well, functionaries, first of all, who yes speak on behalf of the state, but still, but represent only a cluster, the political elite. in general, everything is as it seems to me. i like in such a thing as the system of recruiting these same elites, and it begins with the state. and as far as we have, well globalization has increasingly penetrated into the pores. in general , the entire planetary organism took place primarily infrastructural globalization. here are the very ideas that arose there somewhere in france a or in the uk or in russia. they eventually spread slowly or not quietly around the globe, and here is the recruiting system itself. elite that is, where do you get those people who will lead you, and those people who will be held in their hands, and the means of production will be distributed by those people who will create meanings, because the knowledge elite is very often forgotten. this is a common mistake that is made in many states and actually without those people who will be

engaged in social engineering from those people who will draw an image of the future for you without those people who will be engaged in high-quality journalism. it will be too late for you to start to freeze and stall the system as a whole, therefore, in fact , it seems to me that a is the strength of any state. especially with some such global tasks , the imperial tasks are that all the elites are in more or less degree, adequately represented, of course. elites need to be educated in this sense. by the way, i wouldn’t be ironic there on psaki and with them, but what about the commentary? well, are these graduates of the ivy league there or are they graduates of ok with the fact is that all colleagues who work in the field of higher education will tell lies graduates of graduates, discord, that is, a diploma in itself issued by a particular university is even. e, absolutely does not determine the quality of the intellectual product that we have on

output, because in fact, a person has a huge number of personal inclinations and the actual potential. this is important, that is, the same psaki. e about him, in general, they remember how well she swam on her back during her studies and, in fact, everything was behind this, and because of some outstanding intellectual achievements. although, yes, she really has a diploma from a prestigious university, just like an oxbridge diploma, which, does she have a passion, but again, this is such a semi-conspiracy theory of deep states. deep state it doesn't really have anything to do with conspiracy theories. she is on my mind. this absolutely substantiates what i said a little higher, that is, the task of dividing the elites, because things are, uh, like that. well, quite such global social projects. it's one of the people who, let's say, uh, technical infrastructure projects, but moving forward. this is a little different.

yes, from time to time they all need to be collected in one place and given to them some kind of common agenda, and they will implement it with the help of their own tools. and in cities and villages, when they disperse, but in general it works exactly like this and it turns out, they are not included in any elites. why, again, because i don’t remember even once that they all gathered us and told us a common agenda, which we would go through the cities and all the way down, if, again, a number of our compatriots were brothers on the mission, and i called there, but again you need to understand that these are people who went to absorb their meanings and broadcast them. yes, conspiracies. i just have a question then. it's just like a reality that's all there is a certain god from the machine there is not a god from the machine there is a certain, but a certain center in which centers are formed for these centers serve someone, because

you know how we now take the west as the most dominant civilization in terms of self-presentation. i will emphasize precisely from the point of view of self-presentation, their task in general, it seems to me, is very simple to keep in the hands of this very elite, which is actually not numerous, but the power itself, resources and money. the whole capitalism of the rich is built on this the poor get richer, and the middle class allows it. uh, actually getting rich, we would not see loud falls, but the main thing here is changing global meanings. why is it good, because then there would be no world war, if there would be a single control center, such a globalist approach happens, because not only western civilization comes up with ideas beyond western civilizations. see what the world naively reads world wars always inside

western civilizations when you say there is someone who is capable of handing out such a level of the tasks of which i am talking about god from the machine, then some higher intelligence. but this is some higher intelligence. these are absolutely living people then should not die sometime, but we see how trump suddenly comes into the same structure and then biden comes, and these are very different approaches and very different countries, but it determines the fate of america and that is why whether angela merkel is sitting in her office or olaf scholz is sitting in her chair, german policy does not change globally, yes it does some elements, but germany is still in germany, from this we simply absolutely deprive not only the people of the right of will, not only of the elite of the right will, but we sincerely believe that if there are relatively speaking, two clans of the rothschild rockefellers, and the whole world history and you're playing these clan holders. such conditional categories are always among the

elite in real life. it's never like that within families to keep all this in that, by the way. and the main problem of recruiting people is that children do not always live up to the expectations of their parents, for which a the task is to survive and fight for resources on this planet, because every year resources, if we take global infrastructural swings, are needed for them. global resources need to create global and near-information. uh, the maximum concentration of resources in the hands of the elite was in the middle ages, if well, of course, yes, that is, look, of course, they had a bow of wealth. wait just at that moment the world's wealth is known - this is the form of government. that is, a form of government and a monarchy is a government. and we we are talking with you about the a format of the state system of government ruled by kings, which also sat two funny boys and quietly carefully

played with toys. no, no, just 0.0.00 is one hundredth of a percent. i actually solved it. with whom to fight where to go organized? we were the crusades and so on, but they were not alone, there was also the roman catholic church of the roman catholic church, when they wanted, they took the antipas and enjoyed it as they wanted, there all these games appeared the word sovereignty, after all the word sovereignty. yes, this is obvious. yes, the state order, which was born in france and the baden comrades , had to justify the separation of power, sovereignty, hence sovereignty. maybe, among other things , this will never go further, and so on, yes it happens. this is from the fact that the gorsky people there owned everything, including people on this earth, then he was 19 years old. less has already appeared, but we take america to america after the war, it owned

much more, as a share of world gdp than it is now real? west, that's all. pay attention, the whole history of european wars - this is a history, first of all, of internal wars, that is, in germany france in spain portugal endless lives, but look, but this did not stop. the elite decide at the end of the forties to create some kind of european structures. i, respectively, it with eurot. and today we already have low agreements there in lisbon. today we have the european union absolutely non- complementary to each other. i have a feeling that we are simply due to human characteristics. trying give structure to ordinary chaos, because in fact everything is much simpler and ends within the framework of one human life. absolutely. that is, that one should not try to explain to higher meanings what is actually explained simply by human stupidity. but i don’t think that elite recruiting is stupid, because they recruit poorly. well, if you

recruit, if you used to recruit smart people, and now you recruit fools, everything mass falls in the hijacking of too mass the old it falls in general, in principle on the planet, that is, painfully do not do. not because, but there and somehow the elites do not work well. and because the lady is really better, everyone else is much better. worse go down, because adam was created by the lord all the rest. yes, no education system can be higher than the people who teach in it, so they killed the future generation. here you standing teaching and leading said that you are killing the plus. do not forget digitalization, digitalization, has killed a lot and at the same time no one said at one time that there printing business, then everything was killed by force. yes, the actual redistribution of labor, and everything is much simpler, but in reality it is much easier for you if it were

national. and you understand what you are talking about and what you represent, you are represented by national leaders who are elected by the people and they answer them under this pressure, because if it seems to the people that you are fulfilling the order of a conditionally club with an unpronounceable name, where you can beat on the doors carcass, chubais, then, by the way, he was there, that's why i say him, then further you have question. yes, it’s better to take villas and a carcass, chubais will be persuaded not to interrupt, therefore, perhaps, but at such a moment. it seems to me that it is just the fact that in the nineteenth early xx century the project of socialism appeared as a completely different method of social engineering, and they collided with each other. these two concepts immediately after the war, even, in principle, before namely, therefore, such a bet was made on the fact that he would help hitler, they thought, just the anglo-saxons as a result, we generally see, but on the sad the result is therefore, in fact, this whole uh,

the socialist project. he doesn't let go anymore. today he was practically in charge. sorry about the title, which was the same. well, and what are you, like, it seems to me that catholics pay in germany, which was. well, that is, i chose a certain point in time, this happens not always, because, well, really, if you have a system of checks and balances. you can live like in the usa as the strugatsky brothers said, the people of the north are wise. it seems that the notch, of course, is not dashing, because that's what really confuses me. now the quality of management is significantly lower than the quality of the people you meet in everyday life. people bought comfort. didn't buy any. listen, if you bought our people with comfort, we wouldn’t have a country already. it's not just myself. yes

, i am. well, then, of course, like that. yes, people around the world are very small. and when you talk to people in different parts of the world and different parts of the world and just wonder how in the end everything develops from them the world government. why is the very idea of ​​a world government vicious and mediocre, because it does not exist by definition. you try to leave our oligarchs in one room. they agree among themselves, they can’t do anything, and you want a world government, where you know the level, what level is the number of moments, become expensive. here we see the european yes , of course not. we see the european left in power. who is the oligarchy. well, they probably said agreed, they are not about that. no, they're not talking about that. and who was against yeltsin from the oligarchs there were many at least one at least one of the oligarchs who then could not agree. this is not the point , because for them the main problem was zyuganov, so they agreed against zyuganov and for them then it was yes a lawyer. importantly for them

it was just a toolkit for solving problems. we are now, by and large, faced with what? we see europe yes, and there what interests it protects is not accidental. even the same berlusconi, who was of interest, would turn out to be italy's friend, he says, we must abandon the right century. what it means that it is necessary to give the poles in the face of the hungarians so that you do not dare to fail when they begin to rule, the balts, whose interests in their own peoples do not exist at all. or a ukrainian who is now dictating in europe what they are talking about, what give us the right not to be ukraine take us bourgeois. let us escape our country. we do not want our country to be allowed to join somewhere. completely remove, in general, the very essence of the people you are removed. this is an understanding of the deep history of the tradition of culture, bolshevik wanted a bolshevik or a populist. why because the

bolsheviks were extremely far from the people, because they are like an affectionate theory of a minute and the first extreme. no, they were close to neither the people nor the proletariat. this is the passing part. you see, it means that the whole society is already about the fact that, among other things, the elite. she is still being educated, that is, not only studying. there, let's say in some western or not. western universities. she is still being educated. and uh, there is such an unwritten tradition passed on by the people from which it comes out, this also happens. that is this, for example, is what the roman empire did when it took sons, conquered territories and raised them in devotion to itself. what i wanted to say in the united nations is an unwritten rule, absolutely nowhere is it written anywhere in the charter , but this is 100% true for 77 years, as it were. it is confirmed, and cannot be the un secretary general, but a person from the great five. that

is, it cannot be a person from russia from china from france great britain usa why because it is considered that if, for example, from taking americans are the head of it, well, everything, you can just dunk it with your hand. and if he is a russian, he will, of course, lobby for russian interest , and so on and so forth, when people are not chosen from the top five, they are still looking for some kind of affiliation with them by the countries that i named, because the same, and pan gimon was called pro-american. why because a boy from south korea as a child went to this demilitarized strip between the two countries and the american soldiers gave him chocolates and spoke to him in english, that's what upbringing? that is, i mean that anyway, every person is an elite, not an elite - it does not matter. he is extreme. stephen because he is the sum of his experience, both intellectual and sensual as well .

it is quite obvious that the share of nuclear energy should grow and not less than double. but what about nuclear waste fast neutron reactor they make it possible to ensure the use of fuel in a completely new way, this is not waste. it's not trash. this is an element of further work. they are quite in demand for the needs of the russian nuclear energy industry until 2040 uranium here is the demand for plutonium. but all together it creates the target audience that the energy industry is going to, if we achieve this, the fuel base increases towards it's time to make a breakthrough

one of the most educational models, yes, as it turned out to the americans of the leadership education program, now they say don't tell anyone, what exactly finished. that is , it is different. yes that is why, in order to avoid any affiliations with the big five, they chose a wonderful gtrsha, who has written on his forehead four letters of nato, well, or that's it in french. yes. e, as they say, who was the first to get up, and

elite i somehow brought a half-liter hard fate at the turn of the 20-21st century in the company of someone who was considered, and hmm , it was the second and third row of promising young leaders of russia the team of mikhail borishch. khodorkovsky i can tell you that we no longer had a country, because they thought exactly the same way as their european counterparts think. and some even asian counterparts. these people thought outside a certain temple of national sovereignty, they think precisely of global values, but i will briefly tell you that i think this is a rather difficult topic for me, but talking about the elite, since i do not belong to the elite . i grew up on the outskirts of moscow, where they carried knives to school and where in the tenth grade there were several people who were forbidden to attend classes and were convicted. yes, that's why i

have complex relations with the elite. we and the muzzles were finished in the russian corps. no, i don't. well, i did. i graduated from the usual general education moscow school. so. i think these galleys, how did you get carried away? by accident i'm generally here by accident i'm lazy, what else was pure true a couple of times. but well, if you look at the situation, we are now discussing the situation in europe, then it has developed from two things. the first is, of course, the americans' fear of a strong generation of european leaders. ah, the eighties early nineties. well, of course, there were strong ones. or we can treat them differently, even a major against the background of the prime minister of britain, who was considered but with this pozhozhom thatcher spoke insultingly about him in every possible way, but against the background of the current ones, but this is a giant of thought. i'm not kohl now yes, the same yes

schroeder come on, schroeder already had what is called the third grade chirac yes rings . it was a turning point after what? the destruction of the european elite began to lead these gray ones to nothing now let's look at who brought. these are absolutely constructed, guys, guys without a biography. well, angela merkel , at least there is some kind of biography of pioneer komsomolskaya well, also with vague spots, and the rest don’t have it at all now. wrestler johnson was known a few years ago, only before he became the minister of foreign affairs, as a character. films about

travel. he was still looking for his family. you know, we have it and look for me there, yes, there, valentina leontieva did a great job of leading people to a heart attack . here borscht johnson did it. these are the people absolutely yes means designed by people. yes. and if i know, and he was looking. he found what he was looking for his roots yes, the hair stood on end, yes, so that the hair became smoke, but these are artificially designed people. now let's look at the second point, what is late globalization, this time of pre-house, what did you ask what is real in politics, i will tell you a very cynical thing and i won’t even get a deuce, the only real one in politics. it is will other than will. in politics. nothing else is tinsel. what is the time of perth chaos late globalization is a time without will. when i sort of

understand that now they will grunt about this financial crisis that is now unfolding, they said 4 years before, before that, with a break for a pandemic. all same saw these processes. everyone saw cheating during the late second term of obama, when they frankly cheated with gdp indicators, but everyone saw it. the americans laughed at this already. but globalization is a network that leaves me with very serious and positive moments. the network makes it possible to sacrifice any of the nodes. keeping myself. by the way, i have such a suspicion wild that they prepared ukraine. just on the mortgage, it was not a resource. they experimented on it, what would happen there, but on the other hand, any network leaves very few opportunities for a specific person, a specific node

, to make decisions. so he sees that this is a thacher, but he has written gandhi and he will read that this is gandhi and this time of lack of will, which formed the demand for leaders without a biography without programs. how did this program with which he came to authorities? does anyone remember and i don't remember. what kind of program did boris johnson have, everyone remembers him when and how he parachuted on these means on suspenders. what is the program of the current italian leaders? what is the program of the dragee? yes, they don’t have a program, they don’t need it. they are elements of almost weak-willed elements in the network, rather looking for a control center. maybe only three places. you can look for them in the usa, but we are unlikely to find them. it has become too turbulent there, you can look in england, maybe we will find something, but you need to look for it on yachts on

yachts in the high seas in banking centers, where it is decided where how we add zero to which account, because it doesn’t matter in general, it doesn’t matter which side this is the meaning of the network, but there is a nuance. this is the whole story. this network did not have a plan, it would have been built based solely on the plan. and that time will continue to go on like this without the will of time really. by the way, i agree that they bought, for example, a western hmm, they bought a western voter with comfort. and the oligarchs replaced democracy, because what they are now called democracy is the power of the oligarchs. this, by the way, to the question we were trying to sell peretakratiya here. the oligarchs tried to sell us under the guise of meritocracy, but plan b when something goes

wrong, they didn’t have it. i'll tell you what political will is. but today there was an event that, in my opinion, is absolutely a turning point in the development of the system of international relations in the coming years. today, the iranians have turned off the camera mats are committed to fundamental events, the iranians, the forces of political pain have chosen from the comfort of entry into western integration, moreover, i will say into the european economic system and the creation of tools for our own strategic security. they chose to create a strategic security tool. this means we are closer to a nuclear war perspective. no, it’s completely different, because it’s obvious that you mean that they will now go to work on the creation of nuclear weapons proper, and it’s obvious that it’s pretty hard, let’s say it’s not

obvious, it’s quite difficult to exclude the possibility of using tactical nuclear weapons, obviously. a country against iran absolutely. i think the usa may just fuck about once, but understanding all this is an opportunity to stop development. iran, you understand all this, a rocket is constantly firing somewhere, understanding everything, these are iranians. anyway, they chose the path of creating a strategic tool. but there is no continuation of the line of compromise, we are setting up to integrate into this network to stabilize the economic situation, which is not easy for them, which means that something else has clicked for them . these are the pies. but that means they're upping the ante. so they see that something is happening. this is realistically speaking, there is no conflict now between autocracies and democracies. this is chatter, of course, chatter, which is an effective conflict, which actually reveals a deep crisis. this is between nation states. and above the

state formations, which are controlled by a completely different type of elite but if you combine what you say, why is there such a deep hatred for countries with very different formats. there, china, russia, hungary, this is precisely what is connected with this. that's what europe is right? it's not clear at all. what values ​​there are in the group now, it ’s really incomprehensible now, when you talk to them, you do n’t understand. what values ​​do they have about something , who controls you, who are these people? who will elect them in this way, to whom do they report? what interests? what are their core values ​​just like here we are talking about complex complex vibrations, for example, about biden. he who? the leader of the united states of america is a president who swore on the bible, who considers himself a catholic, but supports homosexual marriages, law enforcement and so on. i don't i want to say whether this is good or bad, but there must simply be some kind of correspondence between the views and what you support. it's not obligatory. this, by

the way, is a deep misconception. here, i always thought that when talking about politics in terms. well, there is tolerance is a fundamental simplification of politics. because they just win, only a principled policy. if you look at it, only deeply principled people are really great politicians. we may not like their principles. they have erdogan. and this just leads to the presence of will ; unscrupulousness with the will is not connected with greed . but with a will with such an iron one, there is none. at the very beginning, they turned on a video on which angela merkel attacked, and this is the woman who for the first time forbade her party to decipher its name, because she did not want the owners to be

associated with the word christian, how would she decipher as the christian democratic union under her party began to appear everywhere. just like cdu, and no more, no less, and zhirinovsky yes, i stopped deciphering here very much. by the way, you just said it is very symbolic that vladimir volfovich was shy. the word liberal in the name of her party, she embarrasses the word christian, this shows where our country is heading and where germany is heading during her speech. she said she told a very interesting story. she says, yes, there really was such a situation when i turned to gerhard schroeder. he hasn't been chancellor for a long time to help me, because a german citizen of turkish origin was arrested in turkey. i wanted to summon him from there, that is, the current german chancellor did not have the resources to respond to this issue. but gerharder, the former german chancellor, could help the issue and uh, you know this crisis of leaders, i can give

an example that our citizens may think interesting, connected with the people here, which i have a very good relationship with the italians, whose last elected example is a minister who went to the polls and people knew that they were voting for this party. we vote for this person. as prime minister was silva berlusconi and after 2011. look , 11 years have passed since the eleventh year until today. italy did not have a single prime minister who would go to the polls, i take the russian did not leave. uh, the rector of e university balcony mario monte became prime minister in order to hold out until the next election for the next election. berlusconi went bersani became prime minister, iriko leto, who was not the leader of the party at that time, after some time, enriku just resigned on his the place came to the tnts, which at the time of the elections was the mayor of florence did not take part in this race at all held a referendum lost the referendum left. instead of him came pavla dzhentinik, who had previously been the minister of foreign affairs. pavlovich did not leave the case, luigi dimaeva

and matrius go to the polls. alvini's two main candidates for premier becomes up to the center of the university of florence. after that, conte and the new parties go to the polls and we get as acting prime minister. now mario draghi, no italian has ever voted for any of these people. i don't speak directly. he didn't even know what to vote. well , i remember the difference, - he said a very funny phrase that the average life time of a prime minister in italy is less than the bushels on the highway. ibid next forty-seventh year to 2000 in italy the government changed on average every 7 months, so this is quite confirmed by the person. there he only managed to repair the office to make a patent to hang up and here already. well, the new government has arrived. eh, and here we are we see this example and we observe such a situation, in principle, practically in most european countries and these countries, when we listen to their reaction to, uh, russia, to our foreign policy. please note that every second or

third performance. they say russia behaves like it did in the 19th century. she needs to stop acting like the 19th century. why have they clung to this for 19 years? why do they always crap the 19th century in the 19th century russia was the third state in the history of all mankind in terms of its territory in russia in the 19th century centuries, people like this, as they called him copernicus, geometries, lobachevsky mathematician, hmm so we were doing the greatest mathematics at that moment , physicists were like uh, popov uh, for centuries we had such chemists as butlerov izinin, we have at that time there were doctors and in whose honor i was now worried, and dmitry ivanovich mendeleev can’t be attributed to separate categories at all, because he is generally an encyclopedist. it is impossible for him to attribute to him any separate branch of science - the literature of the 19th century. this is pushkin griboyedov tolstoy chekhov dostoevsky music of the 19th

century. this is tchaikovsky glinka rimsky korsakov mussorgsky it is clear that this is russia. of course, they don’t need them; they need russia at the end of the 20th century, where the peoples of russia, unlike how they defend their country today, are fighting on the front line to protect their own. for 8 years they live in a state of war and, as a single fist, act together at the end of the 20th century, they were busy killing each other, trying to destroy this country and finding some additional resources there in order to in order to carry out separatist activities, they do not need a russia in which there are such figures that i just listed, they need a russia in which the entire stage, all of our cultural space is occupied, only by sodomites, they need no one else russia in which the main message that will be received by young people cultural will be cadillac money completely different forms of perversions that are interpreted with this by our

young generation, this is russia which they need today, but i want to disappoint these people, because it won't work. our country has a special historical role. that is why our country every time faced with trials that i thought were very few. what people are very few. what nation could endure and then rebuild again. statehood is still of the imperial type, all this is happening, because our country has a special role, it cannot be just that, you know, 100 years after the fall of constantinople, it is in our country that the wedding to the kingdom takes place according to the byzantine rite and ivan iv considers himself successor to this business. and today, several centuries later. after that, the president of our country, putin, led by russia, he is in fact the leader of the free world, because freedom is not what our western opponents are trying to convince us. freedom is impossible without truth, because if there is no truth

, there is no freedom, truth is always transcendent. it is not subject to man, a person cannot revise the truth to make any changes there, and today russia is a country that is the keeper of this truth, and i want to advise these colleagues who are constantly trying to conflict with us. they are today, to say the least. in the language of scripture, today they simply personify sodom and gomora. nothing else. i advise them to read what was sodom and gomorrah and pay attention to the fact that if there were 10 correct nicknames there, at least that, the lord would not have destroyed them. i them. i advise you to find, at least in your ranks, these 10 righteous and start the path to correction, because what they create their own state with their own theoretical foundations of statehood. this is a very fast run on the road to self-destruction. they deprive themselves of the foundations, not of those, even of the values ​​of traditions, which are important for us not

to absolutely give a damn. here, will they be courageous there or will gradually turn into some kind of sexless creatures. let them do whatever they want on our side - this is fortunate. do not distribute any more. they deprive themselves of even the grounds for what made it possible for them to be a republican state what they considered a democrat. by the way, because of this , nothing will exist in the near future. and this is extinction. elite gradually. i gave an example of one italy, no one can explain, here is none of my european colleagues, he can not explain. how he himself influences the formation of the european union, which regulates his life to a very large extent, none of them understands. what is the relationship between the prime minister and his average rating, let's say the government in italy has a standard of 20-25%, this is there was only one president, the former communist giorgio napoletano, who had 80%, but he had no resources . today i saw with my uh, a good and very

friend just from italy, he told me. he says, i don’t know already, he says how to explain it to me, he says to many bawlers who all the time somehow call russia to some kind of constant battle, they want to provoke her. he says i didn't know how to explain. he says, you understand, he says, in italy every day i see how two italians stand on the street and yell at each other, but in russia they speak. what if a conflict starts, and a scuffle usually ends with someone passing out? he says these are not the right people, he says there is no need to provoke these people. this is not an italian approach at all, because he said that this is an absolutely transcendent view of the russian people of the transmission is of quite practical importance, because for some period of time it will obviously be necessary to hit the headquarters, you need to understand, yes, where these are, so that they are located, so as not to god forbid you have mind, we are going to beat the headquarters here. we are not an officer's widow morning, so that we ourselves are not,

this will not happen, you will not wait. it's from again, that's what the trouble is. just some kind of you and i wonder why you are being brought up so young by comrade dean, and comrade academic dean of the candidates we are mushniks. we guys are simple chains and you will see how russian education is blooming. now now, excuse me, but who chained you in these balloon chains ? i want to remind you that we all went under the table, and you were already a size, therefore, here you know, drop the balloon chains from the cartoon somewhere, a pike, who had nothing to lose except his chains, yes, yes, and then, his goal was known, where did it come from, so let's make it simpler, if you have been coexisting with this system for so many years,

if you please, in this, among other things, you all partially blame yourself. sorry deans, so you are responsible. for that is the german system well , that's right, but you came and joined. the formation of the russian federation arrived yes, you can collect them, but you followed their decrees, and read them criminal, of course you are comrades. let's somehow be stricter, otherwise the ministers will start holding the meeting here. we decided to blame the dean on these strelochnikov. we have an arrow epigraph to our conversation can be the words of a classic, after mahatma gandia, there is no one to talk to, to be honest. hmm, i agree with my colleagues, i say, there is nothing to disagree with by and large. there are, in particular. they are not fundamental. we, in which we once again

discuss the greed of the elites of the west, we once again fix our gaze and try to understand what is there and in for god's sake, i'm sorry, i'm tracing this is not the first century that we have seen in russia or in the russian empire. well , i won’t say cringing, but ingratiating desire, despite the tanks of the gun, we have allies, only all this is good, but here, so that they love us, no, the west so that the west still loves us, so that it understands us, and therefore now in which once in a respected studio of respected vladimir rudolfovich, dear people. we discuss. that's how they degraded to the level of oligophrenics from churchill to boris johnson yes, that's degulya to means, uh,

incomprehensible orientation, means macron, so that 's how you are. henry correctly said they like russia at the end of the 20th century. i want a patient. and what kind of russia do we like, what kind of russia do we like, a. isn't it time for us not to pay attention at all to what is by and large going on there? i'm not clear but the method is very simple. well, we wo n’t agree with the elites, you hear, they don’t want us, the press, uh, in the case of the shoemaker. yes, if you go to the old city, you will become a shoemaker. this is serdyuk means with the press ended with artiv, an example of this is cutting out with a jigsaw , all at you. not well, all whom well, and let them live as they want and let's seek understanding. here are the very people of france who remember what margarita is there

, and the very people of germany who yes remembers their origins. the netherlands and so on, which the knights of the round table remember. maybe someone else. let them remember. this is through hunger, cold through problems in personal and social life, which we in particular can arrange for them. that is, to achieve understanding of what is happening with them, we can say that they are radio-controlled. so the toys are in the hands of america after you opposed, i agree, but we don’t agree with them from this, and it seems to me that we need to turn around to our country inward, because the second part of the moralized ballet has already come it has come loudly on february 24th. there is no way back, and as a result, we need to define the

definitions. tolerance, xenophobia, and so on and so forth. this is all superficial that has come to we, when we uttered the words written by mayakovsky, the negro cannot say, because someone, somewhere, somewhere decided that this was wrong. not tolerant. no, reminds me, by chance, on the set, you know, i shoot in krasnodar and in adler. sorry, and i need a black man who plays an armenian. it’s such a comedy here, because it was a negro who reached some student in krasnodar, which means i don’t remember who arrived, his name was gustavs, he didn’t learn armenian. well, as if talking about the fact that this is the son of the festival and here is the grandson. where is the negro? please put the frame a little to the right, that he is coming to me. why is he russian-speaking, he was born in krasnodar,

everything will work out. he says, tigran, you are insulting me personally, he was born in krasnodar. they are almost unimportant to armenians right away from krasnodar. he knows that you insult me. i say why brother? sorry, what happened? it was i, an african american, that got me here, because, well, there was no chain, no normative vocabulary, afra, kuban i say, go stand in the frame too, so jokes aside, and we must deal with the inside. oppositions because if we were at 41, this is a fermenting vacillation of different thoughts, look, and it seems to me that the west has now wonderfully found a new form of influence on our inner political life. they work through the arch-patriots, it seems to me, because the guys, what is so slow, but why not where is the atomic bomb. why don't we move the thirteenth division? why is the taman

division still standing in the stables, do you understand? that is, they are such simple words you can get off and listen lord god, my grandchildren are just tallikhin and this khachevsky. we need to deal with all this, we need to work on unity around a certain idea, because if we are with you, this is right. perhaps we live we are surrounded by the world. we need to understand how we position ourselves, but it's already clear to us that they don't need us alive. and it doesn’t matter to us at all, but they do n’t need us alive in the form of fried or boiled or boiled, or harm is not important. and so that it doesn’t matter to us with testicles, we need to gather inside. and stop sitting on two chairs. here, i don't understand, it's none of my business. as they say. those

legs are not on my paycheck. yes, but i don't understand, if someone sends weapons, uh, to ukraine why do you need to talk to him on the phone? and if there are three, then it means baltic dragons or three of these pseudo-slavic dragons of the balkans , the baltic emirates, when you and these, by the way, in the literal sense of the word, so here they are, of course. we have diplomatic relations. here they are necessarily with these people with these states. are we like the soviet era, but there was no consciousness of us, but we had the last one now on through another neutral embassy, ​​if our russian-speaking people want to apply. i'm talking about the fact that there is such a need among the people. bismarck was right about what is. yes, there are no ways to wake up and not a single one to drive into a lair,

but we woke up. we need to decide on the top, are we awake or not awake? i was on a jury that had to deliver a verdict in one very difficult case. and i chose responsibility, and i chose trust, and i chose forgiveness sincerity.

justice compassion mercy love conscience and how did you do it, and how would you do it? and what did you choose? what would you do and i ask you not to look. in this story , try to feel the truth of everyday life.

the great russian singer sovetskaya alla borisovna pugacheva suddenly said on her israeli vacation now, she said, but if you believe in polish or some newspaper, that if you initiate proceedings against galkin, then i will tell the truth, seriously. i thought i know man, 10, which if they open their mouths, i will start talking. no, i’m just talking about what it is, do you really want to tell us that alla borisovna, given the colossal

people’s love for her, she has been silent all these years or lied no, well, it’s just real, because now i just, well, i would really i wanted borisovna to really tell the people the truth , unless in this they are the mission of a great artist, who undoubtedly is alla boris . that's it in particular, guys. we must appreciate the chance that we got more than this chance. will. i'm sure. this is a chance to formulate an idea. name the ideologies or ideas around which the society has united now intuitively. it seemed to appear around the supreme. but this idea should not be enough, which we offer to everyone. and as a consequence of dualism can not be at this moment, when the individual. that is, you know, so they left, well, after a couple of months again it ’s impossible it’s impossible, like zhenya mironov, being just a

liberal cultural flag, he went up and went to the dombas. so we are a year ago then how are you i won't give it now, you understand? and this is better, because i know that zhenya did not lie, because it is very difficult to lie. when you come and look at you eyes in these these people. there on aliya there are angels. and so it is necessary to gather around this and stop being. here we are a little more. well, how is it in the west? well, maybe the west after all? well from that's wrong. we have no way out and the sooner they understand this power with a ruffling and you separately, or maybe not individual characters in our power who have not yet caught up with what is happening and they think that we, well, everything will return everything will return, but it can't go anywhere. i want to say, the sad thing will never come back. and if he returns, he will not return to a state called russia, and for them there is no value in this

state. well, that means they have to say goodbye, they must either resign for this purpose. we must, among other things, look at our own constitution and at the many restrictions imposed on us by no one knows who, mind you, how interesting. for what it is not known, it is just known that we are reading for what they really are, that is, they are not here. no, i was talking about the constitution now, well the constitution and look how interesting in america is the founders of the constitution is absolutely a hero, huh? their names are the god-creator, and in russia it is the people who worked on the amendments that's the law on the amendment. yes they are famous, they are respected they happen to be my studio. and here are those who wrote the text of the constitution. i understand that sergei borisovich you haven't had it for a long time. you understand and when you take them for this point you ask. and which of you wrote this, for example, you won’t find anyone about the subsoil. yes amazing people, of course, strange, yes, when

people are not proud. it would seem that the most important thing is their collective irresponsibility. at the same time, the people do not perceive them, as a hero from the word, absolutely no founding fathers. by the way, i'm sorry . i believe that we will never be able to be completely honest and build. something really solid on the right concrete, and not on liquid. until the highest stand is judged. i agree with gorbachev yeltsin and belovezhskaya pushcha, 100%. it doesn't happen, because you can't work in this direction, there it was in a different direction, but it all lives on, and as it were, it is impossible to combine after february 24th. it ’s impossible to categorically feel the people’s lies. yeltsin ’s center is incompatible with the operation in ukraine, i don’t agree, there is a position, well, the content

of the concentration is necessary and gorbachev was not bypassed in the center, but in order to know all the crimes of these citizens and all the guilt that lies on them, so that there is it is clearly indicated that, god forbid, these particular destroyers should not be forgotten in the history of russia should be declared. only on programs high, as it should be declared at the level of the president's state. in general, in america , as you remember, yes, the lincoln memorial is located literally there, a few kilometers from memory, how about a general? yes, therefore, here to about the yeltsin center. and now, when we start to destroy it, it will happen with us, as in america, that is, the denial that there was a denial of our history in essence, because the nineties were yeltsin, you can’t cut an assessment from our history anywhere. yes , an assessment must be given an assessment must be given, but destroy. this, probably, is not worth it, because

when they started talking about the elite right now, really. a very difficult problem. we live in a turbulent society theory elite do you remember saying a great idea? but in fact , there should be a yeltsin center, there should be a gorbachev center, there should be a chernenko center, khrushchev center, no, in all seriousness, that is, all the people of the library. guess all the people in this or that world should have centers that have their library there or whatever, but in america it's called the president's library. that's when the theory of the elite was put forward by a stake in burley in the thirties. he was deputy cordal. he said that we have three parts. economic political military combination of strength of one or another part of this elite leads to foreign policy form the foreign policy put forward. he is not purely scientific . he put forward a very specific political task to substantiate the correctness of the course of his chief cordal. kordal hell was a traditional, so to speak, man, but aimed

for free trade. that's to achieve free trade from the openness of the united states. that was the chapter. now the elite is certainly more diverse, but we will not be able to form a clear part of it as well, for example, here's how to treat , say, a bohemian who considers herself an elite. really. we used to consider it cultural. well, probably, yes, journalists, who are also now being formed in the period of berlin in the period of burley, there was that radio and newspapers radio was the peak of progress well, cinema appeared. yes now it's social media. now, in fact, is the blogger an elite or not? what i'm leading to is that here we have such a movement that i just said, that's a marxist, yes a marxist, we clearly defined there is a class of the oppressed there is a class of

oppressors. yes, the proletariat is the bourgeoisie, there are feudal peasants. and now who is the class of the oppressed and who is the oppressor class. who is our elite, you understand? that is, we call it, to a certain extent, a post-industrial society. here is the prefix post means that we don't know we we can't say what it is that we can't call it industrial. i have not heard it, and the information society and the digital society and high-tech, but clearly define, here is the leading part, we can not from here. it is clear that the former structures of the party, trade unions, political organizations are crumbling - these are all attributes of the relics of the former industrial society that comes to replace them. what new public structures are these, all these various network ones,

are there instant messengers and everything else, or are these some other public organizations, that is, here too we can not give a clear assessment, and in this sense. then we proceed to take one more step, if there are no such internal public structures, then the state is also an expression of society. the fact is that the state structure became almost 1.5 centuries old. yes first it was hmm well thomasman, it was uh the wars of religion, but then, which eventually led to the formation of a new system where the state is centric. this is absolutely correct. we now have, as it were, on the one hand, we protect nation state. and how modern are you , how should it be? and on the other hand, the west has moved to another in a different hypostasis. they just crossed a completely different line. they did. i don't say step forward. they made

some kind of void when they deny the state, they are in fact, but the european union is a concrete denial of the state. this is the creation of the organs, and where there are no nations, there is no national state, how can there be a national leader and the state is a manifestation of human nature? i think yes. but this is what i think, this is not the way they think, because yes, depending on the essence of this human nature, let's say, if these people follow the natural laws of nature, then this state is natural, and these people pervert the laws of human nature. then this state is what many states are a tool can be a tool in the hands of the elite, this is from what else the united yes, but while the state does not destroy the first elite, which, if you like, what we call conservatively, which follows human nature, and the second elite which destroys the very concept of man and what is, of course, as an economist you remember, probably the theory of

the mmc yes, where to go? that's right, when there are no other intermediate steps between the step called the state monopoly capitalism and the step called socialism, quote. lenin is not a problem. and what is the basis for the fact that the production of the lord, i’m not an economist closer to you, when the lord created nature, he did not divide it into cells of sciences, and this is the main problem of our time, because we live in an era of synthesis. nau. knowledge based on this when we try to over-smash. it’s on these cells that we always get by, it’s absolutely not right by . here now now. by the way, i showed such an interdisciplinary approach, as we call it, because in fact, based on

this theory, our production is growing. internationalization. moves us to that to a single wholeness. we are just another matter of corruption, of course, all citizens will leave russia corruption will remain. but if the citizens will be like her, maybe the fish will start, about which she literally did not hear. yes? no, no, what are we talking about, that is, then there will be no corruption, the state always carries the manifestation of the people who organized it, why am i leading to look why are the people who now lead the european union many of them have no families many of them lost sexual orientation many of them do not feel their, if you will, national cultural identities, uh-huh, i'm going to this, and this is not determined purely by economism, just the economy is often determined by psychology. i would

say that for the global elite, for the global world, a person who is deprived not only of his national national cultures, including even his sexual orientation. he easily manages easily, because it is torn off, because it breaks away from the category what is good, what is bad. and so, when they say that we have the first american who wrote there, kennedy wrote about the people of the world, yes, in the early nineties and he said that here are it-shniks, well, guys, programmers, these are people of the world, it doesn’t matter to him where he will work from in russia there in the usa to fiji it doesn’t matter it’s his product, as long as he can transfer his knowledge. that's where the customer and get paid for it . that is, this is a man of the world, which, in fact, is the current trend - this confirms that these are people of the world. i'm just saying how quickly the elite has graduated, here we

are talking about dancing now america itself what is the summit america this mechanism was in the ninetieth year in the summer of the ninetieth year, bush puts forward the idea of ​​nafta and the establishment of a free trade zone of two americans before the eighty-ninth year, father was created. here is the ats and the free trade zone of the two americas - these are two huge associations that are pillars of globalization. in principle, the adoption of common rules there and that’s all, and the united states actually squeezes the enemy of its then trading european union and the huge eurasian space between these two main pillars developed. this mechanism was supposed to to become america's summit in principle, the idea in ta died in mar del plata in 2005. now it is a breed, that is, the then american elite. can i name names now? i just do not want to name them, who developed this plan, they are specific.

or the task of establishing american leadership for a certain period for a rather serious period. now it has degenerated into these meetings, which, in general, are empty current american meetings. the elite has nothing to offer, so here the main problem of the create-create-is not only inferiority of the elite, but also in the fact that we are going through a turbulent period that we ourselves cannot yet determine, in russia in this case we need to decide, we have already decided as a national state. that is, we preserve our statehood. now. what kind of state, because otherwise we cannot prevent the influence of the outside world on us. it is this influence that needs to be transformed for our benefit. well, the outside world influences us. well, we do not change, you understand, we look around. well a lot at this time is gone are changing. yes, i think i was born old. yes why well, look first we operations the world

spoke in a different way, how could india have phrased it that way? yes, this is the minister of health, as he said, enough is enough, this is a wrong practice. yes, your problems are global european. ours do n't concern you. how could we talk to the americans like that, could a saudi a-a, not answer the phone, or in dubai not answer the phone, when president sasha is out, too, national states are a subject that rushed. why did i start the question. they are simply national, they are today a reflection of the natural nature of man, of course. and by the way, batman, i'm really worried about him, look up to the twentieth amendment, lord it

's certainly terrible. alik is such a philosopher. uh, very, probably the most famous, probably living jürgen, habermas. uh, 90 plums for 100 years. will soon be on the site now, peacemaker means, yes, he was caught on the minatoit site for us, because you said that, by the way, the main ideologist with the dpg spoke out for a dialogue with putin, where do you come from, so to speak, scholz scholz? here it could not protect the scholz themselves now cannot protect it. over there he is not there, he is just there, as the ukrainian ambassador is already wiping him calmly on his feet. and he , so to speak, from khabibas. moreover, it cannot protect. so here is habermass. e earned such a theory of the communicative mind, and he proceeded. in general, from the fact that well, humanity is

becoming a lot of people. here we are, roughly speaking, 100 years ago there were a billion people there on earth. yes , it's getting bigger and bigger. yes, at the same time it goes all time. eh, the division of labor within society, that is, different professions are becoming more and more differentiated, and therefore it arises. here is this big, big culture of specialists, yes , there are also elites, semi-elites of various cultural financial within financial ones, there are also some semi-financial ones, which are with stock, and some are from insurance, and some are engaged in futures, and some are hedging it turns out that there is a whole uh, struggle between them. that's where they differ from each other. this for us. they are all financial there, and there is a huge variety. oh well, and hobermans himself was in favor of dialogue. that's exactly what he formulated the principles of this communicative mind, you need to have the ability to change, there are other things. eh, everything. it is perceived very idealistically and perhaps

it somehow worked there in a certain period of time. ah. now he is being sent for this number. but the fact is that there is another phenomenon of social networks, which, by the way, has also had a very strong influence on degradation. elite she to a large extent, by the way, is also associated with this phenomenon. we, when we work in social networks, there is a simple principle. oh yes, we like it. yeah, uh, who likes? yes, somehow expresses a similar point of view, we somehow add them to our friends and so on we friend. yes, those who do not like baths are sent somewhere, in the end they happen. this is encapsulation, when a person is surrounded by his own mirrors, he accumulates, and he actually does not hear or see anything else if the networks were organized in such a way that you somehow randomly get other people there, and you can’t also remove them. and you can have the so-called negative inverse. here, as in cybernetics. yes

, not only everything is positive for you. yes, not only mirrors, but there are none here. these negative connections are gradually getting rid of them and therefore people live in this environment. here, if you take those same galkins and others, those who left, here, if you listen to them somehow. that's even out of the corner of your eye there take a look at their society and so further. they really live by their own measure, and in this world it absolutely seems to them that this is how they consider everything. and if someone thinks consciousness, yes, yes, if someone, uh, as they see, well, on tv, they see that someone speaks differently, but he says it, because he was paid, because that they were all somehow bought there, they were punished there, and so on, but they all think the same way as we do, because it is impossible to count otherwise. we are all agreed here. everything is like this, but this is the story, it is complete. going on and in these bengarian clubs in some, that means,

commissions of some meetings in that same davos forum where the same party gathers, everyone sings the same songs, everyone, so, uh , they talk about it, again, no one is going to hear no one. what claims does lavrov make to these comrades all the time. they do not hear, we told them this, we told them, we told them 10 times , they do not hear it. they see us all the time when they don't really hear. they really don't want us with this situation make. well, on the one hand. yes, the willingness to change, the willingness to hear, is a good thing and it’s not bad that, by the way, we pay attention to the west and listen to what they have going on there forever and the ostrogalian meaning was also interesting for the gloomy german genius. and the fact that we ourselves need, but somehow the end to lead and unite. here is the question. it's really. yes, what about what? uh, and here's this one, if we really want to have us on something. they influence there to split europe there as they said. yes

indeed we must have some kind of fist, yes some strong thing. and it is some of these things that do not allow us to do. uh, what has just been said about uh agents. uh, we came to pay attention to that typical well-known nomenclature, which we call grenade-eaters, who, uh, have long been identified as people who are listening to the fatherland somewhere. what is going on there, well, there really is a huge number of people who, generally speaking, uh, don’t seem to receive any money, they don’t seem to talk about some kind of liberal values ​​or something else, on the contrary, they drew the letter z on their avatars, but they melt away a completely different song, and such agents actually exist and, uh, as far as i’m certain, i have intelligence data there, yes, and which are already checked. yes indeed it is. a serious ukrainian and american project that is currently underway, on which they are staging,

which they finance directly. we are unhappy. rusnya. he is called dissatisfied with the fact that there is not such a pace of the special operation, that some generals behave in a wrong way, what didn’t they do there? something not that the power is there, there again there is not so much lack of drones, and here it goes, it goes, that is, there are some stories about the fact that all the time, that we have something all but wrong. and here, uh, the american principle comes into play, it doesn't matter, true or false, useful or not useful. there are really not enough drones. and my friends and i buy these drones every day, send them , moreover, if we have now created a whole fund on the basis of the popular front, which the popular front has created everything for victory no no look at one thing, when we do this thing, and who determines what is good for my country? well, it's just real, that is, as

a citizen of the country, i do not have the right to ask a question critically. you see, there are just people who got the trouble in the kiev region. i have to applaud this and chernihiv. right? after all? we ourselves are now saying that yes, is there where to understand? that's what's good for my motherland, which is chinese wisdom, which says in sadness about states, you need thoughts, but you don't need to pronounce words that increase sadness in the state increase should be based only on the assumption that there is a higher mind that governs the state. no, why are they doing this for a minute, naturally they knew who needed to know or this problem, this fund, this and so on, because it shows that there is no society, no people, no. but now a good number of people are sent as volunteers

are they doing everything in vain? why not? right? well, how, and you can say volunteers and without you everyone who needs to eat will figure it out, and people go pass, there retraining courses. they want they want to participate, they come to participate in the form, even if something goes wrong, where are you with her perfection. they must proceed from the fact that, god forbid, you tell the truth. it is important against the contrary, if you, uh, see some kind of imperfection, take it will become. according to the nato classification, it is not by chance that the voivode’s missile is called satan; this is a real doomsday weapon sarmat will be even more powerful; this missile can provide a trajectory around the signal. we confirm the training and combat unit arrived, the given area with

amazing accuracy, the voivode complex, which is replaced by the sarmat complex, he was in operation from ukraine, there are almost 6,000 people of missile troops at combat posts. today it is the crown of rocketry,

but you are the nineties, yes, the same state, well, the president is different. well, the same thing, russia is called. but the other president of the russian federation, and now i see what is happening. yes, i see grenade eaters. i see theft. i see the oligarchs, but in order not to network sadness, i must be silent or i'm here, for example, i see only refer. yes, that is, when people there who want to be citizens of the russian federation have been talking about it with rita and tigran for as long as we’ve been there , but we’re the main one there, who needs it, it’s glowing, i have an answer to this, too, on in fact, it's in its place. if in every decent i led everything would be in order, but if now, if you say not to be silent, then we had the experience of the ninety-third year. here i am, for example,

saddened in thoughts about the state. yes but didn't love not yeltsin, not everyone else, but at the moment when there was an assault, ostankino and so on. i thought that it needed to be suppressed for some simple reason, that i knew that if these people would take over. that tomorrow khasbulatov's proverb means with a russian rudskaya barkash. i am a ukrainian and you see the collapse of russia, that is, you do not see the support of the state. and you confirm that you supported those who dispersed the legitimate power in the country ; yeltsin was the same legal power. of course not, of course we considered this issue. that is, is there, is there different legitimacy. but why speech jurists? yes, i have an idea, i was going to be an artist. you wo n't lead me astray. and i will not bring you down with putin what you offer me. this is not even stalin 's yezhovskaya, gauge. no. well, of course, yes. all the children are quiet for you, what needs to be decided and not to

talk about anything, and the russian person is on the other russian person, when the soul hurts, he talks about it. we are having a military operation, but we understand that there is a war going on by the west, or the west has not declared a war, but we have a war right it’s not particularly important that we haven’t declared war, and ours, and this is an important moment, we haven’t introduced the status of martial law and military time has already been introduced, and this is ukraine’s restrictions on civil rights, which include, among other things, what oleg is talking about, it’s possible, only bringing certain legal status. stalin said something for the russian people about what it was a toast? he said that you in the forty-first year, the russian people had the right to refuse confidence in our government. we would have to cite a huge number of errors there. he acknowledged these mistakes said. yes, they reached moscow from breaking up the boilers and so on, but you have

shown boundless confidence in our government, and because of this, he drank endlessly. no, governments. here i am even drinking interest for it now. you are not for trust, you are for the lack of the right to a word of criticism. but this is what you would have said to stalin, the right to criticize and so on, restyling allowed such harsh criticism in your address. including from the top of gogol's generation, he shot when he began to speak and say that there were those this makes us on coffins, fly and so on. it means that stalin thanked after the victory. but what you are proposing is now for all those who are not indifferent to shut up and watch, that is, there is no need to help. yes, because what is happening, we do not need the heart to hurt. why can you do this criticism and carry the grains of enmity for a minute. since

when is criticism and grains of enmity synonymous? i have to see when some bastard commits a crime, steals, including the people, well, be silent, because what are you, what am i to be silent about chubais must answer the scoundrels who still speak for good, when he still spoke to him , i spoke about him even then. and, by the way, the same kind of people told me, no need, no need to inflate the grains. you understand that he is involved in high trust. i'm not talking yet, but it was still so right. we and the screen know very well what you are talking about. and you know what i will say, but the people must be loved and believed in. our people are wise, no one expected that such a percentage of support would be so. please keep believing. just need to be clear to distinguish if intelligence has pinpoint data that someone receives ukrainian money and conducts it, or foreign ones carry out certain

actions there. there are no questions. but when you really see the nerves of our people. they talk and work to make it better, it is necessary to act like in the government, which brings such people closer thanks to. based on this, life in the country is becoming better and more efficient, it has become easier to live, it has become more fun. that's for sure. well, there's no time at all. the first word is, of course, more expensive than the second, but the last one is gold, but if the first word was the size of the gold spare, if you weren't arguing, yes, we were looking for the answer to the question. uh. yes, i found, that is, it happened in italy wonderful, what difference does it make the classes of the bourgeoisie. uh, working peasants, managing managed italy - this is a concentrate of european civilization and the

country has existed for 70 years . everyone knows the match, vatika. well , the church and it's specialists. i was told, we were told absolutely wrong. that is, not even close you are not the only connoisseur, does not even pretend. but we just, i think, we even sit down here, that i'm telling you, they are quite the third officials, therefore they are very officials, yes, and controlled and the second, and relative to their fortress closed. they are in business with our russian fortress and we have broken through the operation in ukraine, punched a hole in them and penetrated into their fortress remark. here they are still scary. i didn’t draw

a trojan horse, of course, but the americans were once able to introduce a trojan horse to ukraine and obviously something zelensky is very curious about everything that is happening now connected with grain, because, well, today this question is also completely boorish, and some dumb ukrainian journalist, minister of foreign affairs of the russian federation sergey viktorovich lavrov , asked what stolen in ukraine, in addition to grain, russia has already managed to sell that, you always have a headache about where to steal, yes, and you think that everyone does this. i answer you. we are engaged in the implementation of the goals that were announced publicly saved the east of ukraine from the pressure of the neo-nazi regime. that's what we do grain. we explained today that grain can be freely transported to destinations from russia without any obstacles. no, for this it is necessary that mr. zelensky give the command,

if he still commands something there, and that they allow foreign yes and ukrainian gardens to enter the black sea. at the same time, it should be noted that the topic of russian grain theft was actively abandoned by charles michel, who tried this topic it is not by chance that the representative of the russian federation, the citizens of benzia, turn to the un security council. i just left when this nonsense sounded and it should be noted that later the representative of the secretary general. he said they did not have any data to support such accusations. well, initially all these are from america, but at the same time, what are we talking about, less than one percent ukrainian grain is no 20 million. it is not, if 6 or 5, in fact, in ukraine it’s quite possible now if they take it out there will be a terrible voice and already now forecasts, terrifying on the other hand, messed danilov to the generation from lugansk, who, fortunately, luganskaya kicked out and was immediately picked up by the ukronazis, and she

is now the secretary of the security council there. he also said that this is a trade bubble for us. it’s not us, in general, like we won’t give anyone any grain, until we continue to explain some of our political demands, on the basis of which it is completely obvious that the whole game of ukraine with grain is a lie. lies , a provocation in order to put pressure on russia confidently moving continues to move and it will not stop. they are that all these howls do not play any role whatsoever. it seems to me that ukrainian grain is not played here. ukraine is playing, the americans. europeans this grain really. you know, i was not too lazy, i looked at monthly grain exports of ukraine last year the year before last , the peak months for grain exports fall on september, october, november december, starting from january. well, by this time it will already

be possible for the port of odessa. no, i'm leading to what this is for nikolai. i was already to which everything was unblocked by the russian authorities in december, neither in november nor in december there was any special military operation , no ports were not blocked. then we can assume that ukraine did the same thing that was done in the twentieth in the nineteenth year , freely exported. grain, starting from january. grain exports traditionally fell three times every year; there were already leftovers that needed to be removed. now about theft. did you understand, uh, ukrainian grain is stored the main storages of ukrainian grain, they are concentrated in the central and southern parts of ukraine well, except for the kherson region, where the special operation is going on, all other regions do not fall within the zone of the special military operation, so these stories are about theft. well, in my opinion, more than exaggerated, or maybe

invented to achieve a specific goal. i look like you know. so synchronously information is somehow thrown in, then some elevators were fired on and burned down. how much grain burned down , very much, how much i don’t know, well, it got sunburned, then information is thrown that something was poisoned, so to speak. this is grain, it is unsuitable even for feeding livestock. i get the impression that in fact we are talking about the failure to fulfill ukraine's contracts related to the direct supply of this grain, where ukraine supplied grain to europe , asia and africa, now all ukrainian grain goes exclusively to europe that is, contracts before e , africa, for which everyone was so worried, they are not fulfilled. i do not rule out that this is ukrainian grain getting to europe can, then it will get to africa but already at a completely different price, you understand, this is such a concern. e about africans, therefore, in

relation to ukrainian grain, in my opinion, this topic. it was exclusively invented and pumped up in the world media in order to redirect this ukrainian grain to europe and not fulfill those direct contracts that ukraine had with asia and, uh, war. yes, yes absolutely right, you know america is degreasing. there europe europe degreases africa well, that's logical. yes, we already live say under capitalism. who is stronger here in africa has not been living for a long time, yes, but believe me, there is something else to write down now about uh, so to speak, confirmation of pavlovich's words before another that it is purely politics? let's see what danilov specifically said. yes, there will be no grain security, no one will go anywhere, because for us the number one security issue is. we have a large city, a large region. if we are not sure that we will ensure the security of our

country unconditionally. we cannot agree to this. food is under control, because it is our common responsibility to other countries of concrete russians, it is precisely putting up these obstacles in order to capture this market. you know, they also have grain, they want to say market, and then blackmail her hand because of the shortage. it should put pressure on our country, as soon as possible to find conditions that satisfies russia . sign this or that. acts of grain carriers carry grain to europe on a regular basis without any problems. i think that there are no more than 20 million tons of grain in ukraine. if there are these five or six of this, well, maybe, at best, so daniil's statement that we will not carry is also due to the same carry. actually there is nothing to sell. you know, like

in that, like in that movie, say everything has already been stolen before us, so all of egypt won't get its grain either. naturally. well, that is, uh, we are talking exclusively about political dividends, which , in fact, what is expressed in accusing russia that russia stole grain there , burned grain there, poisoned grain there, and so on political, of course, but in reality everything is happening a little differently now about supplies. uh, weapons. you know, i have a feeling that nothing has changed at all since the end of the great patriotic war. here, the wehrmacht loved such big e big cats. yes, there he is with these heavy weapons. all over. entirely called there tigers panthers. today the situation has changed a little, there are leopards and cougars. and i still remember what they were smashed with with cute good katyushas, ​​yes, and now today we have what armaments peonies are all carnations from them,

you understand? yes? well, that is, this is, by the way, also a very similar thing, yes, this is a thing. by the way, this thing, by the way, is very symbolic, but you know what i noticed that, despite all this, europe is still. yes, today i see that bulgaria refuses to supply weapons already at the parliamentary level, greece, criticizing germany for its own , is not quick, so to speak. they did not give us that weapon, so we will not supply either. germany is pulling with deliveries. it seems to me that before the europeans, slowly, slowly, but the beginning to understand that they really want to drag them into this big conflict on their territory, that is, the question is necessary. it is clear that the british are also members of nato yes, but they will not fight in britain, but will fight here in europe, and it seems to me that there are already, at least, fears that this conflict may go beyond ukraine, and this is the unwillingness to supply weapons, according to at least escalate the situation. i think there is one more. uh,

the moment you know, we often talk about what ukraine has there, uh, ukraine must fight until the last ukrainian. it seems to me that even if this last ukrainian survives, yes, during this war, then ukraine will fight until the testing of the latest types of weapons that they want to test on the territory of ukraine, agree that this is not every time such an opportunity falls, yes, test their own types weapons in direct contact with the weapons of the russian federation how would one miss such a weapon here, and by the way, they may well. and by the way, connected with this is the limited supply of certain types of weapons, which in fact, they don’t want to break even the war, but simply test locally at certain points and draw the appropriate conclusions rodion what is happening on the territory in the territories there is a stable movement forward and, uh, we are fulfilling the task that was set before us . now, despite the tantrums

that pass. uh, yes, in kiev, that is, i didn’t find a counterattack, i didn’t find it, how much they were looking for. but in the area of ​​severodonetsk or sechansk. that is, at least now e airport, which was controlled by the troops of the armed forces, it was cleared. she is territory. e in nitrogen territory. uh, a significant part is controlled by our troops . uh, there's a facility that has snipers, and there's also, well, some armed formations that's chaotic. shooting at urban areas, which means, well, i guess i'm demonstrating my presence. well, the shelling from the lisichanskaya side continues. and yet. so there is, uh, drg, which is moving somewhere there, that is, the situation on the territory. she's not safe, that is, you can't to say that everything has already calmed down there until it is, it is impossible to talk about whether it is taken now until the privolnyansky bridgehead is dismantled. that is, it will be necessary to take the entire triangle. only then will people be able to exhale more or less calmly, even in cleared territories. such as the time of rubizhnaya, it still flies through them. that's

all the same. but somewhere out there in the lisichansk region there is a battery, which turned there and again, yes, that is, they are deliberately leading. these are the ones, uh, like terrorizing the harassing fire, which simply does not allow people to start at least rebuilding their homes, put in glass and somehow feel that they can have a normal life. i don’t know, water will go, some kind of electricity will be brought up. uh, mobile mobile communications will be established. that is, this is what they do not give, but nevertheless it is happening now. there are military operations in order to move all the same, and the main road, lisichansk artemovsk, that is, the reeds have been taken there, but it’s still only going there. uh, fire control, that is, they are, uh, that is the road is such a way, well, the road of life, because the island is from burnt cars. they go along the entire road, so get there with real serious loads. it is impossible in the same way as to withdraw the column from there. it will most likely be turned into scrap, so now there is only movement between seversk, or now there where, in fact, the

commander has already prudently moved there. this is such a ukrainian tradition to leave terbats ahead. uh, well, there is a suicide bomber, as it were, but quietly leave. well, in the sense that you spend time on them, they are already them anyway. well, their fate is understandable, yes, that is, this is how they actually act, so further actions will be completely calmly verified and everything will move as expected, therefore, i was surprised that the western ones i wanted, literally, if possible, there were a couple moments took me by the soul. merkel's interview , which was literally published, but just one little moment about what when about a year ago merkel said, he says, i saw in minsk the problem is stalling in minsk, which means that everything does not work out then. so i realized that there would be nothing at the minsk talks. i want to ask a question. i mean, i'm starting to sort things out in my head. and what negotiations did ukraine not disrupt? these are the negotiations, starting from the fourteenth year, starting from the negotiations, when yanukovych was promised something, well, then europe thwarted and ukraine actually carried out a coup d'état, then there was the geneva format,

who thwarted it yatsenyuk and the company. then it means there was a contact group in donetsk, then it was thwarted by poroshenko he began hostilities again, then there were dozens of meetings of the contact group at the ministerial level, which also did not end with a blowjob, one was thwarted, and on the winter offensive, minsk-2. uh, they were constantly tearing down and have already reached the parisian format. that is, up to paris themselves, who eventually thwarted all these, where can you tell me some obligations that russia did not fulfill or those that the republic did not fulfill. and when now kuleba turns to him , miskri minsk-3 doesn’t suit us, that is, we don’t fits. no minsk does not suit us at all, but damocles in a sword that can be hung over our heads and start swinging it and we are not satisfied at all with us so that we continue to live as we lived for 8 years 8 years. ask any resident of the donbass who understands that at any moment he can fly in. at any moment, what will start anew when you do not understand what will happen for your child. tomorrow, in a year, in 5 years, that is,

there is no such understanding, and therefore there is no trust in ukraine in any case, as well as in the west. actually there is no trust. and now we see, judging by the statements that are coming from the west, such a coalition is being formed that will start dividing ukraine very soon, they will already start cutting it into pieces, while i’m sure ukraine will not be invited there, which means, but they’ll start talking there, in my opinion, poles, americans, british will take part, as the main trendsetters, and then they will say, well , guys, well, it will suit you there. not satisfied, that is, we do not understand the guarantee system, we do not understand. what should happen in order for the west to have some guarantees that will allow us to live normally, raise children and be able to live in restored cities, only one country, which can give you and i think that ukraine should understand this, what other option but to self-control there is another chance for ukraine to stay. well, at least some kind of prototype or remaining part of this prototype of this state will remain. otherwise

, they'll just tear it apart. and here is the section the commonwealth will be a childish summer compared to this schwartz surprise with something. it must be difficult. well , of course, uh, i was surprised that, well, until recently in the past, high-ranking military officers all of a sudden. uh, western press. it prints and the western press - it does not overwrite. from the very beginning, 200,000 dead mustaches, gone somewhere, well, 200,000 this is how you understand, please, this is the us liral newspaper stephen tweety, the loss of vysu can be 200,000. it doesn't mean that it's all 200 no, the paper hasn't been erased, because you understand the paper of the leftists, don't you? well here, respectively, but in general rarely, of course, such figures sound, although more and more often there is information that very large losses are allowed, even their representatives can be at the level of russian losses. this is a british british newspaper, she wrote that these losses

could be close to those that russia says about ukrainian ones, to the fact that in fact russian losses, what russia says in ukrainian understand, they always wrote there, and in the mythical ones there, uh -e fallen russian armies and so on. and then all of a sudden they need to be told that ukraine is no less. why do you need to tell? because im the same. he says we have a huge advantage of the russian army of russian military equipment and in the end, but anyone who is familiar with elementary arithmetic. you understand, when they hear all these reports, a question arises. there we crumbled, crumbled, crumbled the russian army , russian equipment, and so on, and all of a sudden, the ukrainian army is still much smaller. yes this technique and everything else. do you remember arrestovich us when he also said that four out of ten russian armies were completely defeated. this is in april or even in march. yes, it is known that it went its own way. there were always about 100 50.000 ukrainian more ukrainian

question arises. but tell me, how much of the army has it been? since then, something has fallen, the arrest has stopped cleaning it up, if you take it at a pace, in theory, there should already be 15-20 pieces. well, no, it has already fallen more. if there means, if you listen, drawing, well, everyone has already forgotten. these continue all sorts of nonsense, uh print further uh, that is, but, but most importantly, of course they are hushed up. anyway, in spite of everything, these are the shelling of donbass shelling of donetsk. you see, the tass correspondent managed to ask in france, but you know that just yesterday, the french, these very long-range guns , actually shoot to donetsk, and no comments paul ukraine there is something shoots. but it is important to convey this to france, look, you shouted so much that you need to supply weapons to ukraine so that it can defend itself. so, ask a question to your ukrainian lackeys. what are they bombing, donetsk

peaceful. no, that is. well, well, the real question is a legitimate question that needs to be asked all the time by this very european western leader, your guns are killing civilians. and by the way, about the grain. right now, the russian ministry of defense has already announced that shelling. the russian territory came from the territory, uh grain elevator and potato storage in the sumy and kharkiv regions, yes, well, we understand why yes and the ministry of defense. they want there to be an arrival, so that later they can carry western film crews, look. we here russia wants to provoke this world famine. you, er, asked here, cited these stupid data about the world hunger that russia wants to achieve. yes, uh, here. i did listen yesterday. well , today i listened to yesterday’s speech by zelensky and watched everything at this semi-closed

event, the finean shultimes, which hosted it. i honestly hung out, sometimes even the host, when i tried to realize what zelensky was saying, in particular, about this grain crisis. he, when it was mentioned to him, began hotly tell, look, because russia is stealing our grain. we've already caught a few. cases when some countries there tried to accept this grain, but we, it means, beat them hand in hand, and we need to respond to this; yes, if ukraine hits the hands of esa this same russia that allegedly steals grain and allegedly tries to sell it so that people can eat, it seems to be yes, but here, but right there she nevertheless clarified it. so russia is going to provoke this crisis. all this will be the voice of the world africa asia will starve due to the fact that russia disrupts these supplies. this is immediately heard from the lips of the same person. i'm not talking about what he said there

about the negotiations. i tried to build a statement one after another, he changed his mind back and forth for two minutes, then he said that, uh, no, fighting. it's not ours. we must stop fighting. that is, fixed immediately after a minute. he says a victory need to be decided, so on e on the battlefield. uh, victory must be achieved on the battlefield, and more and more not. yeah, it means to fight right there, he says, you should sit the russian federation at the negotiating table in order to conclude a ukrainian surrender pact. well, he immediately says that no, we will fight, that is, the man didn’t say a word, so when in the end he said, no, i’m ready to meet with putin, but not in such a way that blah blah blah, and for the rest i have no time sitting, leading so uh, stutter. i didn't understand, he said, you said that you don't have time to negotiate. yes, you know, yes, and this is, uh, a person who is trying to

articulate something intelligibly, but danilov said a valuable thing. you have fixed it. yes, first of all, ukraine is not going to supply grain. this is ukraine blocking the supply of grain danilov said this in plain text, well, here already, well, no doubt. that's what you need to show everyone everywhere, then we will not unlock it. until we have a guarantee of security, and in fact, all this hype around the grain here i slightly disagree with spiridon, not for the sake of ukrainian grain. we understand fine, and putin said about this that in general there are not many of them, and he will not solve any problems. danilov is also great, russia wants to capture the grain market. yes, russia actually, and so it captured. she is absolutely the leader of ukraine, she was not standing next to it. yes, we putin said that we can increase the supply of grain. and in principle, if there are any problems, but then again, how does this agree with the fact that russia wants to starve the world to death , but again, the main thing, uh, is the meaning of the hype.

this, of course, is the supply of additional weapons anti-shipping, which seem to be going to ukraine right now and really an attempt to create an adventurous project for military escort. here are the same bulk carriers of ships, uh, of all kinds in order to deliver military cargo to ukraine well , uh, supposedly under the guise of what we will then take away from there. corn. here is the main goal. advertising in my opinion. this is the first civilian underwater vehicle, which was created in russia. modern prostheses are made in russia in skolkovo. absolutely

anyone can get them for free. which, by the way, is also not 99% of people with disabilities know another plus of cyberhands - these are cacti, you can stroke a cactus. you can touch it with this prosthesis can successfully distinguish the sizes of objects. well friends? hello, you are so scary. i am afraid of you. i would like to give to the level that a person can trust robots, the fourth industrial revolution will take place precisely in our country. child history of russia for free

peter had the main task of entering the

international arena both in relation to europe and in relation to squeezed between the swedes and the crimean khanate. it cannot develop further. the first day of victory, which was celebrated in russia, is the victory day in the battle of poltava. vladimir nikolayevich, you know, i have such a premonition that at the next eurovision, which,

as it were, should take place in kiev, mariupol, they promised, so in ukraine let's win in ukraine in ukraine, not buranovskaya grandmothers, but grandmothers with a burden with a song. oh frost, frost, don't frost me in pure russian. here we will winter and sing not only at eurovision but what does the government have to do with its full programs. we discussed always sans and a today it is possible to somehow interim results to knock out sanctions - this is a typical crossbow when stupid authorities shoot in the leg, in fact. the people of the people, the people, are the first to feel how the biden shot in america, and not by chance. according to their plans, the dollar is calculated. maybe 200 rubles. and then he didn’t just come up with it, he looked, guys, we will break their economy, something is not right, but the americans felt the price of fuel twice. inflation is growing food is not

enough military aircraft are transported from e, europe baby food and so on. i read the other day printed. how much money do they sell their securities all the time, yes, and they are liquid, that is, all in line are one trillion tried to renew investors bought 57 billion. and why should the chinese invest money when this money can be frozen once? why do this further, they simply forgot that there are laws in society. one of them is the laws of gel, this is the outgrowth of quantitative qualitative changes , and now, when biden constantly says, this is putin's for this is putin's inflation. early or late simple american. though, but is there such a mighty putin and biden says so, yes, then talk to him. or maybe, as he said, you need to get along yes, and if he doesn’t listen, then a thought will appear, and i was at one of the

presidential elections in america and there you are not at all, so to speak, in the states, but a punched card. there is no ballot card, booth and so on, and they exclude someone will write putin with his hand, you know why for one reason they got it so much, that there might be an idea, if he can raise the price, then he can reduce or find those people who spoke with them, they can refer to trump, i do not rule out the candidate for the president of the mask, i do not rule out. and so they are driven into a corner, what is it, maybe? now we've been discussing here, er, the grain topic. i here agree with the peredon that this is a classic operation and because no one would know, but they already stole it. and let's remember in this studio we discussed one topic. in june 2020 , when 2,500 wagons of grain disappeared from the state reserve in ukraine, 2,500 wagons of grain. and what did you say? mia mice ate so they said, so they joke.

so in ukraine today there are such mice, the guys in power, that they are sitting all in a row. it's true. we discussed. it was the size. it's possible. they just said sarcastically mice ate. yes, what kind of a man is he, freely the size of this muscle. yes, we have krupnyak, so svoboda volodya says that i don’t understand, i don’t understand, i’ll tell you, i’ll tell you, this is a classic. here danilov yes on the one hand, he would say against hunger, we will fly, the other part of his speech, we will not give it all the same, and so on. and this is exactly what the americans did with ukraine, first the left hemisphere gives out brilliant ideas, then the right and they give out brilliant things. speech is schizophrenia you can't understand. you did, yes or so and no, and the first question is that we are observing the phenomenon that, by the way , everything that is happening today has already happened in this life, when zelensky understood from nato, nothing is

impossible to do the european union too i'll tell you, especially after the visit of seven million ukrainians there, to be honest, i'm glad that ukraine looked and ukrainians. what is europe once a week yesterday i was talking to acquaintances to wash once a week. this is what is here every day, yes, when they looked? what is hospitality, when they were told, please, and then the bill, and then pay for parking, pay fares, and so on, when europeans saw a ukrainian, they can’t say a lot there, but when women imagine, it was never young in ukraine beautiful women, when here are the fifth shevchenko lesya and the ukrainian e kostenko lena and so on undressing, pouring paint over himself, yelling, and the europeans do not understand that you want this was not. we have broken through the code of moral education

of such obscenity in ukraine as there has never been today, it is bad, says obscenity in the family on the street, and so on today on television. all the posters are up today . you went for three letters and so on, there is snake island and so on. it's a shame for any army, when it's tired shouted keiki, there according to putin and so on, when the ministers of foreign affairs repeat this nonsense. it broke the mother code ukraine is suffering. she does not want to see such children, but these are the children whose fathers bandera that is why i am on the side of the mother of the destitute, disenfranchised against this gang that today is robbing this ukraine therefore, in this case, the zelensky shield is some things. well , i didn’t come up with anything new, he says, you know, give us weapons, and we will win, give us weapons. haven't you heard about the miracle weapon from the demoniac hitler, he said it will be here in

forty-five, but at least he had a fau and something was counting on his own, this comes out for the sake of christ, but people are already beginning to doubt, and therefore today the government is making a brilliant decision - they will support cannibas for us. already today, that is, they approved the cannabis bill, yes, that is, you can’t really see victory if you don’t smoke a fine, but you need to follow the example of poroshenko today, he cried crocodile tears at the funeral. and i ask. and what did your son say to you? didn't send a commander there, who at 14 allegedly fought, they tell us that under strangers. he fought with harry in afghanistan and was not publicly under his own name there, but they protect their children, and kill strangers. take an example from ukraine about grain. you have n’t heard about sugar yet, how we transported reserves at

one time, thousands of tons of sugar disappeared, it was all good for us. there, we ate everything with wagons, and sugar, then with wagons, but yushchenko’s time was he was a famous beekeeper or you know, in the morning it didn’t start with coffee. with a pleasant surprise, when i opened the morning garde, the first thing i saw was this message about the situation on fronts heart severodonetsky with reference to his excellency. mr. ambassador luhansk recognized. of course, they almost emphasized it there. yes, there are red chamfers, the luhansk people's republic, but uh, this, in my opinion, is the first time in my memory. when really, well, such a publication quotes our side. yes, they quote the ministry of defense, but they always emphasize that in the conditions of war they cannot confirm or refute this data, here i directly open these in a frame like this in red, it was just so nice it was so nice it was not well

, listen, uh, it starts, there may be something to reach, but you know the answer to this question. here came literally just why they have reached the point where they have already begun to quote us, but because washington does not have a complete picture of what is happening in ukraine, as well as the activities of the ukrainian military in the combat zone. the times writes , citing high-ranking current and retired american intelligence officers, the publication notes that despite the supply of weapons to the united states, the country is forced to receive information about the situation in ukraine and from other countries and, oh my god , president zelensky’s public statements are still arresting us advise listening. yeah, it is noted that this may complicate further assistance to the administration in ukraine, that is, they suddenly understood. that something is going wrong, and they are not aware that something is going wrong, yes, because the situation on the fronts now is such that they can already hide with all these brow-wrap statements. yes, there is the ukrainian general staff, who tells everyone, god, how everything is fine with us. we're doing so well. at first we

borrowed things from varda, then we took half of him. now we control some outskirts, but we are doing well. everything is under control, no one needs it at all, because it does n’t really solve anything at all. in fact, everything is decided, there is acquisition intelligence. ukrainian intelligence knows how to evaluate a non-british non- american federation at home. sorry in e. tweeted on the avatar of the flag of the lgbt community e with stories that they are pride month. i ca n't have them. well, as it were, before that, they didn’t take it seriously, as it were, but after that, well, some kind of hiss. intelligence, i think possess very cistern information, but obviously this is not the kind of information that will not be public, like real american ones, which are supervised by the daughter-in-law. yes they do. that's it, they collect

a propaganda body, but it's real. i think they are giving information, transmitting this very information to here, well, about the fact that, well, it may complicate further, but i will say this about providing assistance to ukraine, that is, such a notorious amendment to the dash, which requires the united states of america to control all weapons, which it supplies to the countries in which war is being waged, god forbid yes, a whole investigation. here and there , i didn’t like it in the armory, there should be a special supervisory body. they owe each one to this bendura. sorry, i just don’t understand, yes, i still do this, unfortunately, i know what kind, they are damage, what damage they do, what they are called. i don't know they should each control the kauf. whose hands did it hit? what division? in which direction should the reports be issued? there is practically nothing, a very important issue for french citizens. you have placed your cannons. they hammer on the center in the center of donetsk on peaceful

objects two questions. you deliberately set the first one for committing crimes, because this crime is shelling, e.g., civilian infrastructure and civilians, or the second you set up such shit that just shoots where it hits and then the quality of your weapons is negligible, that is, let it be determined whether it is high-precision or not, that is, here they are criminals or just traders, yes, other goods. both you know for the last 3 months. here we mean humanitarian needs for children's crutches in wheelchairs, somehow, all of this, with a request for subsequent prosthetics, we almost doubled, almost doubled, you know, when you asked me from donetsk to hand over a baptismal kit. well, yes, because that's right you understand when they write for children. this is

the very idea from the fact that i am now going to do this. it just blows me away, really, it’s just clean, that’s all my humanism in relation to ukraine, because the worst thing is that can happen in a woman's life. it's the loss of her child. and when every day we see these monstrous shelling of donetsk gorlovka, all this, and no one talks about it, and the ukrainian media continue to write at night that it is from makiivka that they are shelling themselves and no one is interested at all. well, for example, i'm all . they are in general, and the west wrote about it at least once, and you saw zelensky speak with a crying voice and simply call

the names of the surnames of the children who now died from him what they say at the same time russia killed 200 children in ukraine there with something you know, if at least one child really died in ukraine through our fault, it would have been sawn to such an extent and then military, terrible and everything, maybe. it’s just that when they say specifically that it is ours that zelensky should be installed at all, though he doesn’t care, so far we have received answers with you on the butch. no, we have the names of the victims. we have a cause of death. we have place of death. we don't have anything, but the west doesn't need it yet. we will not come there, of course, but we have denisova's confession that she lied in order to get out of the italian, by the way, denisova's lie believes that this is the truth, of course, authorities. i have another wave of church commander-in-chief until the 24th. remember, he also said that we didn’t forget anything and all

the guilty criminals, and the enumeration of these crimes went on, in particular. we have a list for now . and when we start to punish them. when will we start their ship by family name, if necessary, those who are involved in the tragedy in odessa, but not, everyone lives now in a chair no, well, they just have to clearly understand and there must be a list of those responsible for the tragedy so that they know they are disgusting, so that they understand they will be found, and they they will appear, of ​​course, because there is no other way, otherwise i will say this until the retribution of their souls occurs. of course, intermediate information in vladimir vladimirovich will not calm down, in total in the city of bucha, 461 mines of residents died during the military conflict. this yesterday igor klymenko, the head

of the ukrainian police, said. and he was with the new ambassador. ah the united states e ukraine and e. he showed a stand installed there, he tells it in detail and he called this figure the truth while teaching, but butch in the bush itself. here safari is so yes here is 460, but he told the trip that the largest number of dead already, who were buried on the territory of the temple, and he told the rest e in different streets, and i do not want to predict this. well, uh, he said next that the investigation is still ongoing and not established added that there is an hour of established e, on your part, that is, on the part of the russian federation military who took part, we did not receive an answer to the main question. i am the cause of death time of death number.

now. notice these questions. they haven't answered. there is no concrete answer yet. now look to understand everything. but information and then, uh, a statement. uh, and let's not even say that the questions, but the answers of zelensky uh 461, were members of the defense. and here is a very important question. and he said that such an impression says that they are russian military men, and all civilians were seen as partizans or representatives of the territorial, that is, no, no, the status of these people is not clear. yes, these are people now, when they were handed out weapons. and when they turned out to be the old defense, they signed up somewhere. well, of course, they went to the military registration and enlistment offices, definitely or not, if the military registration and enlistment office was in such order that you go to the military registration and enlistment office with a passport and on the street, then they

began to distribute me on the street, i want to say that we still need to figure out those that i from which yulia it will be clear. when it will be clear when they handed over their passports, when we discussed today, of course, well , raise the base. yes, we discussed the public statement today. well, at least three people, who have already named two, but today there was also a statement from mr. kuleb, the minister of foreign affairs. from what e. what is the purpose of all these statements from zelensky and kuleb and klement and uh, the minister of foreign affairs, but you understand. we in ukraine are waiting for two decisions, which should be in the month of june. this is the first at the summit in madrid - this is nato summit we are waiting for the decision to unlock. and odessa port of odessa. we are waiting for a decision on the translation into russian, so that nato intervenes in this

situation and begins direct war with russia. no, it did not begin to fight directly. it is up to nato to intervene and unblock this situation. she will unlock the cards, that is, fight with russia. i think that m-m and biden will be on this decision themselves will not, that is, nato is military russia and says, we will now try to do something to capture. snake island unlock russia we on it let's calculate. they are talking about a war with nato, we are counting on an unblocking, which may be at the expense of what. and by the way, negotiations and the second. uh, the summit of the european union, where we expect ukraine to receive the status of a candidate, if you understand that our goal is ukraine for the month of june, then it becomes clear, for example, zelensky’s interview that the journalist gave yesterday began with a question. and she says that ukraine is in a deaf kutu deaf kutu, and well, i am a ukrainian language, and she asks how you see mr. president

way out of this deaf kuta, that is, further president zelensky gives the answer, but the question is the same question of the journalist, which i prepared for an interview. she says the situation looks like this. as you see the way out of here, you understand, and for me this uh, this is the very question of what perhaps someone represents in europe, in the united states of america in britain or in the collective west, that we are really on a dead end. this position already exists, at least one of the parts of the west, yes well in a dead end, that is, ukraine is in a dead end, and president zelensky further began to give an answer. like what, including about the grain and so on, but in order to go out to see how it will be necessary to unblock, the guys from the crimea showed. oh just look at national security. danilov , he said that he said that in the west they are mistaken

in order to defend against russia and go on a counterattack, it is necessary to replenish manpower. we need at least 25,000 people to send to the fruit. we don't have 25.000. we need six times 20.000. wait, daniel six times 25. what i'm talking about, that is, you need 150,000, you know, when the secretary of the syndro, he says such numbers and talks in general about the fact that we have a shortage. we had waves, but demo-e-mobilizations, to be more precise. one second 4 then this article, which was published today, and the statement of the former leader 200. well, 200,000 or something, but i, as a citizen of ukraine, have a question, yes hair? yes, these guys were dressing up, who already went with us waves, that is, where they are. eh, there is

part, uh, uh captivity, how many thousands are there? and there is some number of murdered people, if less, and there is some figure deserted, there is some number of some left, we have an endless regular criminal cases in ukraine, where people for 3,000 dollars for 5,000 dollars do everything in order to e of military age in order to escape, and then the answer today ends- loops e information, which said, the only thing that matters is kuleba. he says, dear west, you have no more illusions that everything is fine with us. we of course gratitude that you gave us weapons, but this weapon is not enough for us, this weapon, as he said, is critically small, that is, listen, you have just begun to give. you have just begun to give reassurance to mr. listovich, who says, well, for a month, that is, you understand, and it is shipped, then the ships. i am leading to what i am leading to the fact that according to the statements of the officials, the persons whom i have

named, things are very bad. we are really at an impasse. and perhaps we are at an impasse, and not only because the russian army is winning or perhaps wins we are at an impasse in another. and you know this cynicism for me is the cynicism of the grain picture. here's what, but about 3 weeks ago, when this question just started. eh, somewhere to be discussed. i spoke with one broker. then i will talk to another rocker, that is, people who are engaged in this business in ukraine. they tell me dmitry you that in february we returned a long time ago and took everything out. we don't have grain. we have corn. we have some more. cakes, which are already exported across the danube from there. we let's put weapons, but when we bombed the bridge, yes, when we woke up, no, it's important good idea, now i'm going, probably bombing, but not the whole river, but only what will go on this, see you all. tomorrow we are.

it is quite obvious that the share of nuclear energy should grow and not less than double. but what about nuclear waste fast neutron reactor they make it possible to ensure the use of fuel in a completely new way, this is not waste. it's not trash. this is an element of further work. quite in demand. this storage space is sufficient for needs of the russian nuclear power industry until 2000 of the fortieth year of uranus. here is the demand for plutonium. but all together, this creates the target rubric that he did for nuclear

energy, if we achieve this, the fuel base increases towards the time to make a breakthrough

ukrainian units fired on 14 settlements of donbass, there were wounded in the center of donetsk, they were beaten from heavy artillery, and the crimes of zelensky ’s army alexander bilibovsky. today i was under again