massive military deliveries to ukraine from kiev directly to the black market materials of our program pasted the choice between democracies the grace of the plot from argentina balkan europe lavrov's plane was not allowed into serbia the powder keg is still smoking. it is hard to remember when at the highest world level there would have been so much talk about armaments. in the most applied sense, no wars around the world did not stop, but over the past decades. we are accustomed to a certain type of warfare - a clash of obviously unequal rivals, when a major power, whether it be the ussr or the usa, russia or france, came into conflict with countries that

are not comparable to them, the result was clear from the outset . so the question of the ratio of weapons was not so fundamental now, otherwise the fighting. comparable forces are leading in ukraine. the very nature of operations is largely determined by the quality and quantity of weapons, hence the discussions on this topic of different intensity and content , in particular, about how increasing supplies to the ukrainian country will change the course of the company. to give it is very difficult to give an accurate estimate of all arms deliveries to ukraine at the beginning of june, the united states apparently transferred weapons and military equipment to ukraine worth more than $4 billion, in particular, since february 24, kiev received more than 6.5 thousand javel anti-tank missile systems 1,400 stinger air defense systems more than 200 armored personnel carriers. m-13 several hundred

humve 108 armored off-road vehicles, m-77 howitzers and 220,000 shells for them. in addition, the united states supplied ukraine with 20 mi-17 multi-purpose helicopters still of soviet production, and also four jet systems. hall on fire highmors go in version capable of firing at a distance of about 780 km, on april 25, polish prime minister mateusz marowiecki officially announced that his government had already sent. polish tanks to ukraine in addition, warsaw delivered to ukraine several dozen infantry fighting vehicles grad and about 20 self-propelled howitzers 2s1 cloves. weapons included in this contract was not specified. the czech republic supplied kiev with several dozen t-72 tanks,

more than 50 infantry fighting vehicles and hail installations. in general, in general, in recent months. ukraine received various types of weapons and military equipment from australia, great britain, hungary, poland, germany, the czech republic and some other countries. however, the longer the company, the greater the need, the more acute the questions are, where to get such a volume of weapons, what types of weapons should be supplied, and which ones are not. and finally, where is all this in the end will turn out. today. we will deal with an excellent specialist and our good comrades ruslan poohov ruslan hello good afternoon. ah. let 's start with quantity. now they are writing that in the west they are writing so anxiously that soviet weapons and the fact that their derivatives are running out will no longer be everywhere and there is nothing to supply, does this mean that the era of soviet weapons is ending in the world? no, no,

they are slightly different things. the fact is that initially at the beginning of the cold war there were, as it were, two arms development branches. they were called truths. so trifle and weestentnogo. yes, that is, there m16 is western teknowgi. kalashnikov is true, there is an instant-21 there phantom yes, respectively it is absolutely obvious that now this dichotomy is absolutely false. that wonderful weapons have appeared that even turkey produces , probably, it would be better if only a ripper in this scheme. yes, the american has excellent weapons from south korea, uh, a country that supplies not only third world countries norway sweden the united states buys a certain amount of south korean weapons there, so the epoch does not end. she is transforming. and if we talk about specific reserves, we must remember that the western world is often through a proxy with the help of, say. for the past 10 years, the saudis, with the help of the exchange united arab emirates and the katorians, have been vacuuming

all the warehouses in central eastern europe and a number of other regions where there were soviet weapons, or, as it were, according to the true model, they delivered it to syria because yes, there were known cases , there is a bubble of china which is clearly had to, qatar yes, there was a well-known case of the table, but basically all sides. there they fought with soviet weapons. yes, it could have been produced in the dprk, it could have been produced in iran, but they were, as it were, clones of soviet russian weapons, somewhere legal, somewhere illegal, and one of the reasons. why is ukraine now lacking, because those huge reserves that were already largely under uh, were squandered, uh, in the civil war and but these reserves are renewable or are they really renewable, but must be remembered. what shall we say? the same countries of central eastern europe, uh, refused, as it were, from the soviet heritage, yes, and

there were a number of industries, and the liquidation went bankrupt. yes. or how they somehow transformed, there the technological chains were broken into czechoslovakia, so let's say we hope that they are serious. they will produce tanks, there is a t-72 somewhere for the ukrainians. no, i was very smiled at this story that the greeks decided, so to speak, there, given that these weapons came to greece in the ninety-fourth ninety-third year from the gdr, that is, they all had no spare parts for them for more than 30 years, so there are several dozen of this large number. there are one and a half hundred, i think, at best, 20 pieces can be collected. so they crumble with a high degree, so it’s not always when you hear some beautiful phrase. this means that all these, uh, all these units will appear there, say, within two weeks on the battlefield. but now, uh, they started talking about what if we supply ukraine the most modern weapons are the russians who will capture the debunked and understand how they make it, it really is, and there are fears. and it

really is, i will say more. i took a chance e from the screen. this tv. yes, your program to call on the russian authorities not only to develop and do something like that. hand over to all the enemies of the west like, uh, north korea like iran, and to the weird independent foreign policy like china let them spin it too and do the same to themselves, so that next we thought twice before transferring modern weapons to the enemies of russia, we have a good audience. i think it will resonate. uh, the discussion around the multiple launch rocket system, how typical is it that the supplier says we will supply you , but you will only shoot here, but you do n’t shoot here. here, according to the experience of conflicts, in general, in general, portable non-missile systems seemed to be the biggest threat until recently, and several aircraft were lost. but when you can imagine what will be staged e-e salvo fire systems are western

-made halls, primarily american, and the launch range of these missiles is greater than our agrads. accordingly, we have 20 km, they have much more. therefore, in these artillery duels , they can shoot us, i’ll say more in a number of hotheads in ukraine, there may be a desire to actually strike at targets, er, in the depths of russia, let’s say. we have large settlements, even small towns, such as gayvoron, uh, which from the ukrainian side can simply be shelled and cause serious damage, therefore, probably, the americans and a number of europeans understand that there are a number of restrictors who, in general, can infuriate russia. therefore, if at least some rules remain, it will always allow, then to establish a dialogue. if there are no rules left, it will not seem to anyone, this happened unconditionally. it's just that they usually don't advertise it because the last uh, twenty uh, summer, especially 10 years. this is, so to

speak, twitter diplomacy. everyone rushes to declare in real time. yes, we helped to drown in moscow it was we who helped kill the russian generals. and you know, this reminds of a story that, in general, and probably, a fairly large number of the adult population of the planet, both men and women, have some other connections besides their spouses, but usually no one talks about it live . yes, a does not write on twitter, but for some reason another other point of view prevailed here. according to the un, the income from the illegal arms trade exceeds $ 10 billion a year, and in terms of profitability they are second only to the drug trade, international illegal arms market. it can be divided into actually criminal black and quasi-criminal gray. in the first case, mainly small arms are sold in small batches, in the second case, we are talking not only about light weapons, but also about large deliveries of heavy

weapons, behind which, as a rule, are corrupt state structures, the military-industrial complex and high-ranking military, and not only developing , but also highly developed countries as a major illegal supplier of weapons, the united states remained states so during the war in afghanistan of the seventy- ninth to eighty-ninth years. the cia, through front companies, bought soviet-made weapons from the warsaw pact countries and sent them to pakistan, where did the weapons go to the afghan militant? or irangeld, who almost cost ronald reagan the presidency in 1986, became aware that the united states secretly, contrary to its own embargo, sold spare parts for american tank fighters to iran and the proceeds were sent to nicaraguan control. black market for weapons. it was very important for countries under un sanctions such as iran iraq north korea after the collapse of the ussr

, ukraine became the largest supplier of illegal weapons from the soviet army, it inherited a large inheritance, practically. all valuable military equipment was sold abroad. in the nineties , ukrainian weapons were ever supplied to afghanistan, and to the northern alliance. it also secretly went to iraq, syria, libya, and, according to some sources, during the reign of mikheil saakashvili ukraine sold t-72 tanks to georgia for $250,000 each. with a market price of $1 million , the head of interpol recently quite officially stated that a significant part of the weapons that are supplied to ukraine are very likely to fall into completely different hands and criminal hands, and again from the experience of those conflicts that we know over the past decades. how real it is.

the first wave of large arms proliferation in the 1990s was from the balkans; the second large wave began after the fall of yanukovych. return crimea to their homeland and the war in the donbass, when the ukrainians, as it were, began to distribute weapons with their territorial battalion, even then it was a big headache for europe, primarily the continental, but also other corners of the world now it’s completely obvious. these weapons splatter, and the big ones in very waves. you especially understand if you get a kalashnikov assault rifle or a pistol or a machine gun or even an rpg-9 rpg-7 in your hands. you can sell it for a few hundred, huh? dollars, and if you fall into the hands of a javelin, you can sell it for 5-6-7 thousand dollars, respectively, there will always be buyers, there will always be sellers. i am deeply convinced that, let's say, the

russian special services are already doing this and are also buying it out through one channel or another. well , firstly, because to look, and secondly, because, well, just less of our tankers will die and in the same way, mm private, various kinds of criminal structures. i'm willing to bet it won't even be 24 months. how, somewhere in mexico, some cartels will find something from these stocks, the same thing will emerge in africa. and , especially in the middle east, when there is a weapon there is a demand, it remains only a matter of time how quickly it, uh, will spread and how quickly, in fact, it will hit directly or indirectly on countries, supplying these weapons to the same americans, to the same british, maybe not on their territory, but on their citizens, but in the third world, well, the question to which i suspect that i know the answer, but still such is the atmosphere, military in the world, does this probably mean that the military-industrial complex already rubbing his hands everywhere and ready

to increase their appetites are preparing to master large funds and should we expect an arms race? you know there is a direct correlation between appetites, but there is no military-industrial complex and the arms race, because there are always military men, there are always politicians as a spacer. but what any war heats up is the arms market. look like uh owners. uh, bike armatin, the producers of the actor are dizzy. yes, they are already declaring huge plans there and their desire to sell to the whole world there, but it is quite obvious that here are these ritual hmm kamlani, at the same munich conference, and european arms manufacturers, that we are lagging behind, that the americans are doing well with them. everything is bad with us. and now they are definitely rubbing their hands, thank you. ruslan pukhov, director of the technology strategy analysis center, was with us. last week, the

balkans again got into the spotlight before the current events, the last war in europe was there, but already relatively long ago at the end of the last century. since then, the region has experienced various cataclysms, thank god only political ones, however, the history of the powder magazine of europe is stormy, nothing can be ruled out, and to such an extent it is impossible that even the most powerful man in the world, the president of the united states, even he was afraid of nato membership implies that we are obliged to defend any country, take montenegro why? should my son go there to protect montenegro from attack? i have exactly the same question, montenegro is a very small country with very strong people or albania is a very strong people. very aggressive people. they attacked someone and congratulate. you are already in the third world war.

a fair scandal came out then with this statement, a fresh informational reason for the refusal of bulgaria to north macedonia and that very aggressive montenegro, according to trump, to let the plane of foreign minister sergey lavrov pass . shrugs his hands nothing personal just european sanctions in serbia itself, by the way, the reaction is different as well. and why was this visit needed at all right now, only geese. in the sense of teasing europe. and the political situation in the balkans, let's talk with alexander pivovarenko from the institute of slavic studies of the russian academy of sciences alexander hello a. can you tell now? that russia has any general policy towards the balkans as a whole? or does it all fall apart into separate countries, and the peculiarity of russian

foreign policy is its high adaptability at the beginning of the 2000s, but when stabilization of the current regional structure. e russia accepted it and tried to integrate into it as much as possible. yes, this was done in the middle of the 2000s . it was interesting enough. uh, interesting projects opportunities. although, probably, not everything was implemented to the full extent and many chances were missed, but the fact is that the architects of this system, which created it, and at one moment, but mm decided to revise it and this process it is quite slow architect. you mean, here in the balkans. yes, i mean sooner. uh, let's say, from the euro-atlantic world from the european system of international relations. russia has some separate elements here. it is, for example, the guarantor of active peace agreements. but, and the basic rules they were not written by us. we rather accepted them. uh, and when these rules began to be

revised in the same bosnia-herzegovina in other regions. we didn't quite. e, they are ready for this and began to worry very much, therefore , about, and metaphorically, this can be compared with a cherry orchard, and preserving, which is experiencing about the passing times, there is yermolaya lopakhin from brussels who has a specific plan, and ranevskaya yearns for cutting down this forest. e, yermolaya lopahi, persistent. and as we remember, yes, in the background already. the sound of axes cutting is heard. this is the most playful analogy. it's kind of very but hmm it depends on how everything ended for everyone. nobody was badly hurt. it seems to me that the chekhovs are here. well, the company has forgotten. only who in this story is firs interesting, here is this firs. it seems to me that president vucic, who generally found himself between hammer and anvil, on the one hand, he seems to

be pro-russian and very, so to speak, quite a pro-russian mood in serbia, while doing everything . this should be done from europe, here they are. here's what to do, but in my opinion. uh, serbian foreign policy is determined by two circumstances. the first is the motive of national survival. the fact is that in the 20th century serbia experienced, in fact, three national catastrophes. the first world war, the second world war nineties great human losses, every fifth person. killed in every tenth world war i, and world war ii, and in the service definitely do not want a repeat of this disaster. they don't want damage. yes, that is, if you wait, it seems to me, their installation, but on the other hand. if we look again at the structure of relations in the region, it turns out that the situation in serbia is not so bad, because in recent years a lot of investments have come to the region along european lines. uh, more than 14 billion euros they are only for serbia yes the entire region yes but serbia is one of the main recipients this money. and there is not only this money, but there is a big renovation of the infrastructure, new

ports, new railways, it-sphere, and a new company is coming, and uh, serbia and, to some extent, other countries. this is not such a periphery as it was the last 10 people in the expert environment here? i refer rather to such a euro-atlantic opinion. yes, uh there is such a thesis that the foreign policy neutrality of serbia, and it, uh, concerns only the military sphere, that is, we occupy military neutrality, but we are not political neutral state. yes, we are still committed to one line or another, but this was emphasized by the state position. it is rather an expert position, a state position. she is more cautious, but here the motive is clearly expressed, so to speak, but izma, that is, this is a reliance on international law, but an attempt to prick to catch, uh, both sides, not only moscow but also brussels, on all sorts of international precedents. yes, and the kosovo situation. it is used very strongly here, again , i repeat, not only to reproach moscow, but also to the reprimand of the forces that, in principle, torn away this region

from serbia is appropriate here. to remind, of course, that ukraine is a country that did not recognize kosovo and does not recognize kosovo for its own reasons, and here there is a certain motive for mutual understanding, of course, and long-term. here is kursovsky, uh, the factor of the kosovo problem to learn. uh, it seems like he participated in some attempts, uh, to agree to find a political solution, then he took, on the contrary, a sharp position, but in the bottom line , something is happening now regarding the settlement. or that it's all aside. a. well, look. uh, the kosovo situation, it is characterized somewhere. post-streaming speaker, there are periodically some flashes in bursts of incidents, but, in principle, this has been happening for many years. uh, with some periodicity here, probably there is nothing new, but, again, the question is much more interesting about what

the structure of regional relations is like here, and not only about belgrade, but also about a certain set of neighboring countries, such as macedonia and albania, uh, and which, uh, are now forming some kind of integration association that is not the european union. it is in his area of ​​interest. this is called the open balkans or the balkan skill of schengen a, and here we have a really interesting situation. because if you look at some regional diplomatic agenda, it turns out that in the creation of this regional union it can be called a customs union, or some kind of economic union there, it turns out that serbia and albania that is, early they are somewhere interested in the fact that it took place, and kosovo, that is, pristina, and it sabotages these efforts in every possible way. uh, justifying this by the fact that, firstly, and this is not european integration. this is not honored in the eu. and now we want entry into the space-splash, they want a member of the eu, but

on the other hand. uh, they're talking about belgrade's so-called economic expansion. and this is confirmed. because if you remember a few years ago you even came across a customs barrier of 200% duty on serbian goods, a and a. pristina, quite consistently, these efforts are sabotaged and it turns out that serbia albania yes, they have a common interest somewhere, in order to appease this rather destructive position somewhere, it is believed that bosnia is a constant and persistent headache, because once yes, there was an effective treaty, but since then national construction has been strongly advanced. moved russia was accused more than once, uh europeans americans that she allegedly ruins block flirting, what is there now happening. three months ago, on february 28, representatives of the republika srpska, miloradodik

, said that bosnia and herzegovina would not join any of the western sanctions against russia, the politician also stressed that the bosnian serbs would not support bosnia's entry into nato, which is especially important during the current crisis in ukraine. agreements of the ninety-fifth year above, the country's authority is the presidium of bosnia and herzegovina, in fact a triumum, which includes one representative each from the three main ethnic groups of bosnians, slavs who have adopted islam of orthodox serbs and catholic croats. all important decisions in bosnia must be made by consensus of the three parties. true, the last word remains not even with them, but with the foreign supreme, whose representative is appointed by the un security council, this is a foreigner, equidistant from all conflicting parties. for almost 12 years this post was occupied by an austrian slovene. valentin intsko, and on august 1,

2021, he was replaced by a german. christian schmidt nosov besson could not approve his candidacy because of the position of russia and china, moscow and beijing want to abolish the post of high representative so that bosnia can become a truly sovereign state, the subjective smell opposes. appears in the narratives in the press, and the idea that bosnia and herzegovina is destined to supposedly disintegrate into several parts, but it seems to me that this is not the only possible future for this territorial entity is numb, but perhaps the scenario is more likely, uh, some uh internal transformations of political transformations, but those associated with interchangeable elites and what will follow this, but the big question, of course, and the possibility of some kind of crisis, but, uh, i would say

that there is e that, here is the second scenario, it is somewhat more likely. and what is the problem of bosnia herzegovina and the current political system is very complex built on many compromises. it really provides stability, but economically it is stability, it is provided, but by external financing, mainly by european financing and in our terminology. this is the south , this parlor unprofitable region and uh, definitely it does not suit. uh, some european countries. this does not suit germany and the new so-called high representative. this viceroy of the european union is essentially a german. christian piece and what is curious, if earlier career diplomats were usually appointed to this position, then the peasants schmidt, he , in the past, was, the minister of agriculture of the german government, that is, in fact, they sent a business executive to the south, when to rake, as they say, some then farms. these are known principles. ours was exactly the same. that's

uh, if we look at some german sources, they talk about the need to establish a tough hand, and the pressure on the local elites, and the question is, uh hmm what this can lead to thanks, alexander pivovarenko was with us and they will bring conditions guidance. the balkans and its environs, more precisely, southeastern europe, a space more than saturated with military potentials according to the global fire power analytical center, turkey has the strongest army in the balkan region. it is also the main pillar of nato forces in the balkans, its armed the force consists of over 700,000 men, 3,000 tanks and 11,000 armored vehicles, hundreds of artillery pieces and rocket launchers. including the russian s-400 anti-aircraft missile system , more than 600 aircraft are in the service of the turkish air force, of

which 200 are fighters. mostly american in 16, the turkish navy is also the most powerful in the region, half as many people serve in the greek army, but that’s all. also more than a thousand tanks. about 6,000 armored vehicles and over 150 rocket launchers. the air force is still inferior turkish, and the park of the military fleet. comparable with turkish only by the number of frigates of submarines and patrol ships corvette, there are no greeks, in general, and mine tra to, only three armed forces of romania serve 100,000 soldiers and officers, there are american patriot and m142 haymars missile launchers, but the romanian air force is represented by outdated instant fighters -21 and 60 helicopters are also mostly, the soviet naval forces are also weak frigate queen mary, the former british f-95. london was launched almost

half a century ago the armed forces. serbia has about 80,000 soldiers, officers, 300 tanks and 1,200. armored vehicles. in recent years. the country received six mig-29s free of charge from russia , 30 armored reconnaissance patrol vehicles brdm-2.rf and t-72ms serbian tanks, the fleet of military aircraft is represented by ten fighters and 17 attack aircraft, as well as 50 helicopters, of which four are uda. although it has no access to the sea , and the river flotilla of the croatian army operates on the danube, half the size of the serbian. in terms of number, composition, similar the situation with armored vehicles, tanks and artillery installations, only croatian missile systems are larger than serbia; the country does not have attack helicopters, but 12 fighters. four of them were purchased in ukraine and the modernized mig-21 in

the bulgarian army, the basis of the air force are soviet su-25. last year, the country signed a contract for the purchase of 12 french-made rafael fighters that will replace the mig-21 and mig-21 bis. less than 10,000 people serve in the slovenian army, while the country's military budget is $ 550 million allows spending much more per soldier than its balkan neighbors. the turn of the century swept through the balkans crushingly from the most prosperous socialist state, which many envied to painful fragmentation through national religious wars and external interference. then it seems to be the end of history in the european union and that's it, and here europe is in a fever. no one knows what the european project will be like in 5-10 years, but for the balkans there was no other scenario, except for integration into the eu

. no plan b but wait for new ones upheaval for all societies. depopulation is typical there, because so many have left their countries, an acute problem of aging. ask an ordinary person in zagreb that if, because of ukraine, the entire european union will shut down at the seams, if a big war starts, the answer you will get is that we are all too tired to fight. look at politicians. they periodically wave warlike banners, but to whom people leave to fight, they send money transfers home. them. need a job. earnings, of course there are veterans who unhappy, but they are no longer warriors age. so the return of the wars of the nineties is unlikely. in extreme cases, socio-economic chaos and instability. but yes no plan b. no, they definitely said the collapse of the ussr was a sparing lucky escape from the worst yugoslav

scenario. hurry up. in our open spaces , the delimitation with a new redrawing of borders turned out to be simply postponed. what the yugoslav experience teaches, the craving for the former unity has not returned, of course, people’s imagination is present nostalgia quite often, even in croatia, many talk about past. what a good time social justice stability was, there was no need to worry about tomorrow, but these are nothing more than images. there are no organized political forces that would appeal to yugoslav ideals . the legacy of the war is too strong to dream of a revival. i must say that they remember that era. in general, positively with more sympathy than here in russia they remember the soviet union in general, there is no way back, only forward, so that it does not mean after advertising we will go to another hemisphere. summit america this year is special and also influenced by events in distant eastern europe

. why do you need my megapowers? you can activate yours. activate the free transfer of a minute of gigabytes to social networks and music and much more on the new megafon tariffs . it works comfortably and safely. well, here's the fast payment system, a new method of contactless payment for purchases that will deliver anywhere. order.

there has never been such a russian cold 150 g, an unprecedented rich taste in one glass. try a real ice cream, russian cold great incredible taste. think for a second. you have one value that cannot be taken away or blocked, and it remains with you even without money. this is the value of your communication with loved ones. and we teach you. hi baby. communicate at zero on your account at all megafon tariffs - this is when it is easy to choose a high interest rate on a deposit and quickly transfer money there all services one platform

for deposits in different banks. only now we raise the rate by 5% bonus on your first deposit in any bank on financial services. register and open a deposit online domestic manufacturer with a worldwide reputation leader in the production of cellular and monolithic polycarbonate. south oil. a layer of reliability, quality at an affordable price , traveling around russia, the magnet takes care of you and offers discounts on your favorite products, shebekin pasta 58-99 magnet, buy cheaper. a tele2 subscriber on his smartphone is always charged at full rate with cool equipment, he is ready for change at any time, he can send gigabytes and knows when to buy, sell and even change for a movie

subscriber so, only in tele2 tariffs it is not by chance that the voivode's missile is called satan according to nato classification, this is a real weapon

of doomsday sarmat will be even more powerful, this missile can provide a trajectory around the signal. we confirm that the training and combat unit arrived in the given area with amazing accuracy . los angeles hosted the summit america meeting of leaders of all of the american states, the previous one was in 2018 , there was always enough noise around the forum, as a rule, because of the conflict between washington and havana, and

then caracas, but this year everything, especially. nervously, the biden administration did not invite the autocrats of cuba's venezuelan leaders to the event. and nicaragua, in response, changed their minds to go the leaders of mexico, bolivia, honduras, guatemala and el salvador sent lower-level delegations, and the president of brazil was sonar. donald trump's like-minded person right before the trip and the first meeting with biden publicly doubted that he honestly won the elections of the twentieth year, biden's leitmotif of democracy of all countries, unite against russia and china second in the region is very, actual beijing is methodically expanding cooperation with the american states, and their mood in the region, let's talk with juan pablo prada lallanda, professor at the independent university of benami rita in mexico

world and latin america part of this we can't forget the time of trump when the us derailed and multilateral cooperation and integration ideas in the us wants to secure its position on the world stage, and in the western hemisphere, first of all, to counteract expansion. china but the united states wants everyone to play by their rules, namely that the participants meet the formal criteria of democracy, so they exclude some countries. this does not enjoy the support of many other states, as a result there is no unification, and the disjunction, however the context, is itself something unfavorable tangled rather strange to insist. in the approach of democracy against autocracy, but at the same time striving for venezuelan oil to return to the market, no american policy faces very serious challenges, of course against the backdrop of the ukrainian crisis. the us needs oil. the natural source of venezuela in

mexico, for example, is simply not enough oil, but for this it is necessary to establish relations with venezuela , formal and informal maduro. need us support to stay in power, but it's not clear yet are the americans ready to go for it, if the war and the crisis continue, i think washington will have to move towards the oracus. it will be interesting to see. on december 2, 1823, in his annual message to congress, us president james monroe outlined the basic principles of his policy towards the states of the american continent. the idea to declare these territories of the zone closed to the intervention of european powers belonged to john quincy. addams to secretary of state for the monroe administration, later adams himself became president, the reason was the plans of the holy alliance of russia, prussia, austria, to return the spanish domination over the latin american

colonies, which proclaimed independence, the monroe doctrine was the answer of the united states should not interfere in the internal affairs of european countries, and the state of europe in the internal affairs of america, any attempts by european powers to impose their political system on american state or acquire new colonies in the western hemisphere were considered hostile acts and an attack on the national security of the united states. but this did not in any way prevent the united states themselves from pursuing a non -colonial policy on the continent. later, the monroe doctrine was repeatedly used to justify us intervention in the affairs of latin american states, for example, to justify the invasion of mexico in 1846 or to explain the entry into the war with spain in 1898, after which almost all spanish colonies in the pacific ocean and the caribbean sea crossed the united states remembered the editorial friction and during the intervention in cuba in

haiti not coragu panama and colombia the monroe doctrine operated for almost two centuries until the united states abandoned it in 2013. everyone knows the historical monroe doctrine, the last time they remembered washington under trump. and now she is acting. the us understands that latin america is no longer their backyard. we are now different nationalism is increasing here. and it has a growing influence on our foreign policy. this summit only confirms this. you see how many countries refuse to accept the line proposed by the united states, american influence in the region is declining and this one more challenge. their foreign policy is already too many challenges. biden. i would like to use this summit to consolidate american positions, but now nothing will come of it when you talk about nationalism. this is nationalism of

various kinds, left right, so quite right. latin america is extremely diverse. this is a kind of planning cauldron, there are both left and right and different types of nationalism. but it grows all over the place , no good in that. no, because nationalism leads to the fragmentation of the region, and the summit - it only makes it worse. and what feelings does the conflict in ukraine evoke in vosino america? we see that the countries of the region as a whole are trying, well, how to refrain from expressing a position, well, first of all, these events look very far from here, of course, no one supports the war. latin america itself suffered enough from violence of wars and invasions, by the way, primarily from invasions from the united states the united states in the late 19th and early 20th centuries occupied cuba twice during the second occupation, there was founded

american base guantanama bay in 1915-1916, the american expeditionary force under the command of general. john pershing invaded several hundred miles into mexico in 1912 the united states captured and occupied nicaragua for 20 years, and from 1915 to 34 haiti from 1916 to 24 american troops were in the dominican republic and in the sixty-fifth they organized military coups there held puppet elections april 17 sixty the first year the us tried to overthrow fidel. castro on the playa giron. landed one and a half thousands of cuban mercenaries trained and equipped by the cia, but they were unless you were micastre troops in 3 days on september 11, 73 in chile, with the support of the united states, the military path of the president of the

alienda sparkle took place, one of his former associates , general august, pinochet, a military dictatorship reigned in the country in the seventy-seventh by the americans the civil war was unleashed in el salvador, and on october 25 - 83, more than 7,000 us military invaded grenada, where the leftist government of maurice bishop was overthrown shortly before , but his former companions took power 6 years later, on december 20, 1989, the united states invaded panama, the goal was to overthrow the government of manuel in riga and establish a regime loyal to washington in order to control the panama canal from 81 to 89, the united states provided the main military and financial support to the nicaraguan contras. in their war with the marxist government of the sandinistas, we condemn the war, but

many countries also reject sanctions, such as mexico, the position of the mexican government this is a signal not even to moscow, but to washington that we will not act according to his instructions, we are different and we are independent. well, of course, the ukrainian conflict will have a great impact on world affairs for latin america. we look at the huge financial assistance that the united states provides to ukraine and we understand that nothing like this is close to us. latin america is losing some of its significance in the international arena. all attention, again on europe, published latin america understands that the conflict began, actually not in february 22. it just came to the culmination of a long process, when the united states involved ukraine in your sphere. yes, here it is understood that the difference between today's latin america and what it was a few years ago is that we have many more different sources of information thanks to modern communications smartphones. it's not like it used to be when cnn or the bbc were the main source.

so there are a lot more different opinions than before, for example. compare the twitter of the russian and ukrainian embassies in mexico city and there is support for the mexicans there and there, but i must say that the russian representation has more, in general, the russian position of latin america is gradually is gaining. thanks to our mexican interlocutor. he says that nationalism, emphasizing one's own identity, is the main trend in latin america. and what is more important for identity than national symbols. for example, the capital of a report from argentina on december 6, 1880, buenos aires was officially declared the capital of the republic of argentina , even then it was the most populous city in the country, but then in a young country its population barely reached 500,000 inhabitants. today , about 3 million people live permanently in buenos aires. people and another 3 million. visitors recently, president

alberta fernandez proposed to move the capital to the province every day. i'm thinking about whether the capital should be somewhere other than buenos aires, maybe it should be moved to the north to give this part of the country all the potential that any capital has, maybe the ministry of the city, the mining industry, it is better to be in a mining province , and the ministry of fisheries to be somewhere in the fishing ports of patagonia. today, the whole life of the country is concentrated in buenos aires. however, thoughts about the change of the capital for several decades, does not leave power back in 1986. well, president raul alfonsín proposed moving the capital to the patagonia region, where cities such as vedma, rio negro and carmen de patagons are located, according to alfonsón. this was supposed to decentralize the country, reduce bureaucracy and territorially separate political power from economic power, it was planned to invest in the argentine province and revise the state

structure as a whole, transfer various political and representative offices to the south of the country. functions, for example, the ministry and oil companies in cities such as commodore and vodavia or trilla, but since patagonia was considered an underdeveloped region. this was doubtful, however , the idea voiced by the incumbent president alberta fernandez has not yet been developed, there were no public opinion polls, so we went outside to find out what the people of buenos aires themselves think. came back here, but lived in the province for some time. most felt the difference. and come buenos aires for education and work in search of better opportunities, if the capital was in the center of the country, and not on the coast, people would have more work all economic activity is concentrated here the capital port i think that the transfer of the capital to the provinces would stimulate the development of the economy and

tourism. it would help to better distribute goods. however, in any medal. there are two sides. among the passers-by there are many who were not born in buenos aires, but at the same time there is no categorical opposition to the transfer of the capital to another part of the country, and no this is out of the question. buenos aires is buenos aires and will remain so. despite everything, this is our city, our culture, this question is not even worth raising. i am against they want to transfer the ministry to the province but all the documentation all the administrative part will remain here this will entail. add. and costs yes , there are cities that have an extensive system of government distributed over different regions, but they have a key element that is not in argentina in many countries of the world the capitals have been removed from the center due to the developed system of railways and roads, such as in paris or london, that is, people can live 45 km from

the capital, but at the same time get there quickly and without problems. however, buenos faces other problems that affect the well-being of the population, many of its inhabitants, for example, do not have access to a life on the necessary sewerage services and lack drinking water. it's all about the uneven distribution of the population, a third of all the inhabitants of the country are concentrated on relatively small area. and as you know , the living conditions of people in large urban clusters are not very good even after more than 30 years. many questions remain unanswered. indeed , president alfonsin's project is still relevant now, but the question of where to get the budget to transfer the executive judicial and legislative power to another part of the country still remains open? the plot of the week was the talks of sergey

lavrov in ankara, where the issue of exporting grain, blocked by hostilities in ukraine and the results. not yet known. although those involved make it clear that the process is productive, the topic of food. we have touched on it more than once and will return to it again. in the meantime, we note that there is one problem that is really important and there are two approaches to it; it seeks to avoid a shortage of food in the world and for this purpose to postpone military-political conflicts for a while, or to use this very shortage in order to obtain additional advantages in the collisions mentioned, let us join the opinion of edward grain chairs board of the russian union of grain exporters, which was announced on thursday at a discussion in the club. valdai, by the way, after she intervened, again fau. the first time was probably a few weeks ago. they seriously stated that the problem should be solved for all participants.

that is, both for ukraine ona and for the russian one, real progress only appeared then. here. i just want to thank the organization for its contribution. that is, and if it is the fau that will be more persistent in solving these problems. i sure that we can move on, that is, here uh, in no case here in our u business in our history should there be right and wrong. that is, in our history everything works very simply. we are engaged in the production of grain and its sale by delivery. uh, as for those in need inside the country, this is primarily for the nation's branches of fly agaric processing and, of course, bakery products, a lot of the most diverse, uh, feed. on the basis of grain are produced both abroad. that is, there are also, in fact, two goals, food and, uh, feed, like this works. our business. he er assumes that we just know each other well. yes, we deliver, fulfilling our obligations independence from the situation. this is our part and we as a business will

provide it, please decide. questions for us, so that such barriers do not arise, so that we do not solve problems that are not typical for us. let them solve their problems, trying not to interfere. the rest to decide their own, at least it seems reasonable to look at the international review, goodbye.

it is quite obvious that something like nuclear energy should grow and not less than two times. but what about nuclear waste gives the opportunity to completely new way to ensure the use of this is not waste. it's not trash. this is an element of further

work. quite a demanded volume of this storage. enough of the russian nuclear power industry until 2040. here it is the demand for plutonium. only all together it creates the target ruble, which is going to, if we achieve this, the fuel base increases to the side.

this is the first civilian underwater vehicle, which was created in russia, modern prostheses are made in

in russia, in skolkovo, absolutely anyone can get them for free. what, by the way, 99 percent of people with disabilities also do not know, you can stroke a cactus. you can touch it with this prosthesis can successfully distinguish the sizes of objects. well, friends? hello, you are so scary, i'm afraid of you. i want to reach the level where people can trust robots, the fourth industrial revolution will take place in our country.

berdymukhammedov was awarded the order of friendship serdar urbanulovich president of turkmenistan development friendly relations between the two countries, all the details of the visit of the president of turkmenistan to moscow, this is the first official foreign trip poor people were left, and without a home, the civilians of donetsk again under fire from ukrainian militants, and in odessa they are preparing a provocation this time with the help of the burial of plague victims. how does a strike on an airfield hit military targets?