tons of grain have accumulated in the warehouses of zaporozhye since last year and the farmers are ready to work in the elevators according to the old trading schemes. however, kiev does not provide corridors for the export of grain, blocking the accounts of entrepreneurs, and ukrainian counterparties do not transfer money for the delivered grain. therefore, new old connections are a priority. this is russia, including the peninsula, crimea to dagestan from the donbass brought children with developmental disabilities for them prepared a rehabilitation program in one of the local sanatoriums with each child will engage in speech therapists and psychologists planned creative workshops and hypotherapy trip organized by the all-russian people's fund. in the republic of donbass, concerts are held in honor of the day of russia, the stars of the russian stage arrived in the lpr dmitry pevtsov jasmine zara rodion gazmanov artists will visit five cities in the region, music festivals will be held, including in the liberated territories, massive deliveries of weapons to ukraine

led to the flourishing of the black market from kiev , weapons are ready resell almost anywhere country, including on the territory of the eu, about this, as well as about the diplomatic scandal in the balkans and about how america itself went, see the international review program. hello on air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events of the week of chronicles facts comments massive military supplies to ukraine from kiev directly to the black market not allowed into serbia powder keg, still smoking. it is hard to remember when at the highest world

level there would have been so much talk about armaments. in the most applied sense, no wars around the world did not stop, but over the past decades. we are accustomed to a certain type of hostilities - a clash of obviously unequal rivals, when a major power, whether it be the ussr or the usa, russia or france, came into conflict with countries that are not comparable to them, the result was clear from the outset . so the question of the ratio of weapons was not so important now otherwise fighting. comparable forces are leading in ukraine. the very nature of the operation is largely determined by the quality and quantity of weapons, hence the discussions on this topic of different intensity and content , in particular, about how increasing supplies to the ukrainian country will change the course of the company. it

is very difficult to give an accurate assessment of all arms deliveries to ukraine at the beginning of june, the united states apparently transferred weapons and military equipment to ukraine in the amount of more than $ 4 billion, in particular, from february 24 kiev received more than 6.5 thousand javel anti-tank missile systems, 1,400 stinger anti-aircraft systems, more than 200 armored personnel carriers. m-13 several hundred humve 108 armored off-road vehicles, m-77 howitzers and 220,000 shells for them. in addition, the united states supplied ukraine with 20 soviet-made mi-17 multi-purpose helicopters, as well as four multiple launch rocket systems. fire highmars. these versions are capable of firing at a distance of about 780 km, on april 25, polish prime minister mateusz marowecki officially announced that his send the government. polish tanks to

ukraine in addition, warsaw delivered to ukraine several dozen infantry fighting vehicles grad and about 20 self-propelled howitzers 2s1 cloves. this contract was not specified. the czech republic supplied kiev with several dozen t-72 tanks, more than 50 infantry fighting vehicles and hail installations. in general, in general, over the past months. ukraine received various types of weapons and military equipment from australia, great britain, hungary, poland, germany, the czech republic and some other countries. however, the longer the company, the greater the need, the more acute the questions are, where to get such a volume of weapons, what types of weapons should be supplied, and which ones are not. and finally,

where all this will end up. today. we will deal with an excellent specialist and our good comrades ruslan poohov ruslan hello good afternoon. let's start with quantity. here now they are writing that in the west they are writing so anxiously that soviet weapons and the fact that their derivatives are running out will no longer be everywhere and there is nothing to supply, does this mean that the era of soviet weapons is generally ending in the world? no, no, they are slightly different things. the fact is that initially at the beginning of the cold war there were, as it were, two branches of the development of weapons. that's what they called truth. so differently and westanteknula. yes, that is, there m16 is western technology kalashnikov there is an instant-21 there is phantom yes, respectively absolutely it is obvious that now this dichotomy is absolutely false. that there are, uh, wonderful weapons that even turkey produces ractar, probably, it would be better if only a ripper in this scheme for the american one has excellent weapons

from south korea, uh, a country that supplies not only third world countries norway sweden buy in the usa they buy there what -the number of south korean weapons, so the age does not end. she is transforming. and if we talk about specific reserves, we must remember that e the western world is often through a proxy with the help of let's say. for the past 10 years, the saudis, with the help of the exchange arab emirates and the kators, have been vacuuming all the warehouses in central eastern europe and a number of other regions where there were soviet weapons, or, as it were, according to the east model. well, they delivered it to syria because yes, there were known cases , there is china's bubble which clearly had to, qatar yes was a well-known case table, but basically all parties. there they fought with soviet weapons. yes, it could have been made in north korea it could have been produced in iran. but it was, as it were, clones of soviet russian weapons, somewhere legal, somewhere illegal, and one of the reasons.

why is ukraine now lacking, because those huge reserves that were already largely under uh were squandered uh in the civil war and but these reserves are renewable or they are still really renewable, but it must be remembered. what shall we say? the same sides of central eastern europe, uh, refused, as it were, from the soviet heritage. yes, and a number production were, and the liquidation went bankrupt. yes. or how they were somehow transformed, there the technological chains in czechoslovakia were broken, so let's say we hope that they are serious. they will produce tanks, there is a t-72 somewhere for the ukrainians. no, i smiled very much. this story that the greeks decided, so to speak, there, given that these weapons came to greece in the ninety-fourth ninety-third year from the gdr that is, they all had no spare parts for them for more than 30 years, therefore from this big dozens of quantities. there are one and a half

hundred, i think, at best, 20 pieces can be collected. so they crumble with a high degree, so it’s not always when you hear some beautiful phrase. this means that all these e, all these units will appear there, say, within two weeks on the battlefield. but now they are talking about the fact that if ukraine is supplied with the most modern weapons, the russians will seize it and develop it and understand. as it is done, this is true, and there is a fear. and it really is, it is i will say more. i took a chance e from the screen. this tv. yes, your transmission to urge the russian authorities not only to develop and do something similar. pass it on to all the enemies of the west like, uh, north korea like iran, and to the strange ones pursuing an independent foreign policy like china let them also promote and do the same to themselves , so that next time they think twice before transferring modern weapons to the enemies of russia, we have a good audience . i think it will resonate. uh, discussion around the system

salvo fire, as far as it is generally typical that the supplier says we will supply you, but you will only shoot here, but you don’t shoot here. here, according to the experience of conflicts, in general, portable units of missile systems seemed to be. until recently, the largest load and several aircraft were lost. but, when you can imagine what will be staged. uh, volley fire hall systems are western-made, primarily american, and the launch range of these missiles is greater than our agrads. respectively we have 20 km. they have much more. therefore, in these artillery duels, they can shoot us, i’ll say more in a number of hotheads in ukraine, there may be a desire to really strike. for purposes, uh, in the depths of russia, let's say. we have large settlements, even small towns like gayvoron, uh, which from the ukrainian side can simply be shelled and cause serious damage, so, probably,

the americans and a number of europeans understand that there are a number of, uh, restrictors, which in general can infuriate russia therefore, if at least some rules remain. this will always allow, then to establish a dialogue. if there are no rules left, it will not seem to anyone, this happened unconditionally. it's just that usually it is not advertised due to the fact that the last 20 e have been summer, especially 10 years. this is, so to speak, twitter diplomacy. everyone rushes to declare in real time. yes , we helped to drown in moscow, we helped to kill russian generals. and you know it on tells the story, which, in general, is probably enough a large number of the adult population of the planet, both men and women, have some other connections besides their spouses, but usually no one declares this on the air. yes, he doesn’t write on twitter, but for some reason another another point of view prevailed here. its income from the illegal arms trade

exceeds 10 billion dollars a year, and in terms of profitability it is second only to the drug trade, the international illegal arms market. it can be divided into actually criminal black and quasi -criminal gray. selling in the first case predominantly small arms in small batches, in the second we are talking not only about light weapons, but also about large deliveries of heavy weapons, behind which, as a rule, are corrupt state structures, the military-industrial complex and high-ranking military, and not only developing, but also very developed countries a major illegal supplier of weapons, the united states remained so during the war in afghanistan of the seventy-ninth to eighty- ninth years. the cia, through shell companies, purchased in the warsaw pact countries, soviet-made weapons and sent them to pakistan, where did the weapons go to afghan militants? or erangeld, who almost cost ronald

reagan the presidency in 1986 , became aware that the united states was secretly selling spare parts for american tank fighters to iran, despite its own embargo, and the proceeds were sent to the nicaraguan contrast black market for weapons. was very important for countries under un sanctions such as iran and cancer, north korea after the collapse of the ussr , ukraine became the largest supplier of illegal weapons from the soviet army, it inherited a large inheritance, practically. all valuable military equipment was sold abroad. in the nineties , ukrainian weapons were ever supplied to afghanistan, and to the northern alliance. it also secretly went to iraq in syria, libya, names according to some sources, during the reign of mikhail saakashvili , ukraine sold t-72 tanks to georgia for 250,000 dollars apiece. with a market price of $ 1 million

, the head of interpol recently quite officially said that a significant part of the weapons that are supplied to ukraine are very likely to fall into completely different hands and criminal hands, and again, based on the experience of those conflicts that we know over the past decades. how much is real. the first wave of a large distribution of weapons in the nineties was from the balkans; the second big wave began after the fall of yanukovych ; europe's biggest headache is primarily the continental but also other corners of the world. now it's quite obvious. these weapons splatter, and the big ones in very waves. you especially understand if

you get a kalashnikov assault rifle or a pistol or a machine gun or even an rpg-9 rpg-7 in your hands. you can sell it for a few hundred, huh? dollars, and if you fall into the hands of a javelin, you can sell it for 5-6-7 thousand dollars, respectively, there will always be buyers, there will always be sellers. i am deeply convinced that we will say russian special services are already doing this and are also buying it out through one channel or another. well , firstly, because to look, and secondly, because, well, just less of our tankers will die and in the same way, mm private, various kinds of criminal structures. i'm willing to bet it won't even be 24 months. somewhere in mexico, in some cartels, one of these stocks will be found, the same thing will pop up in africa and , especially in the middle east, when there is a demand for weapons, it remains only a matter of time how quickly it, uh, will spread and how quickly it,

in fact, will strike directly or indirectly at the countries supplying these weapons to the same americans, to the same british, maybe not on their territory, but on their citizens, but in the third world, well, the question to which i suspect that i know the answer, but still such is the atmosphere, the military in the world, does this probably mean that the military-industrial complex is already rubbing its hands everywhere and is ready to increase appetites are preparing to develop large funds and should we wait for the race weapons? you know straight there is no correlation between appetites, but the military-industrial complex and the arms race do not, because there is always the military , there is always politics as a spacer. but what any war heats up is the arms market. see how e owners. uh, armatin bike, manufacturers would be so dizzy. yes, one is already declaring huge plans there and a desire to

sell to the whole world there, but it’s quite obvious that these ritual hmmlans at the same munich conference, and european arms manufacturers, that we are lagging behind, that the americans are doing well . we have everything badly. and now they are definitely rubbing their hands, thank you. ruslan pukhov, director of the technology strategy analysis center, was with you. last week, the balkans again got into the spotlight before the current events, the last war in europe was there, but already relatively long ago at the end of the last century. since then, the region has experienced various cataclysms, thank god only political ones , however, the history of the powder magazine of europe is stormy, nothing can be ruled out, and to such an extent it is impossible that even the most mighty the man of the world is the president of the united states and he feared membership in nato implies that we are obliged to defend

any country take montenegro why on earth? should my son go there to protect montenegro from attack? i have exactly the same question, montenegro is a very small country with very strong people or albania is a very strong people. very aggressive people. they attacked someone and congratulate. you are already in the third world war. a fair scandal came out then with this statement, a fresh informational reason for the refusal of bulgaria north macedonia and that most aggressive, according to trump, montenegro, let the plane of foreign minister sergey lavrov pass. he was supposed to fly to belgrade on a visit, the russian authorities did not fly, and the president of serbia, vučić, is indignant at the authorities of obstinate countries, shrugging his hands nothing personal, just european sanctions in serbia itself, by the way, reactions are different. and why was this visit needed at all right now,

only geese. in the sense of teasing europe. and the political situation in the balkans, let's talk with alexander pivovarenko from the institute of slavic studies of the russian academy of sciences alexander hello a. can you tell now? that russia has any general policy towards the balkans as a whole? or it all breaks up into separate countries, and a feature of russian foreign policy is high adaptability at the beginning of the 2000s, but when the current regional structure stabilized, and russia accepted it and tried to integrate into it as much as possible. yes, this is in the middle of the 2000s and did. this is enough. were interesting. uh, interesting projects opportunities. although, probably, not everything was implemented to the full extent and many chances were missed, but the fact is that the architects of this system, which created it, and at one moment, but mm decided to

revise it and this process it is quite slow architect. you mean, here in the balkans. yes, i mean sooner. uh, let's say, from the euro-atlantic world from the european system of international relations. russia has some separate elements here. it is, for example, the guarantor of active peace agreements. but, and the basic rules they were not written by us. we rather accepted them. uh, and when these rules began to be revised in the same bosnia-herzegovina in other regions. eh, we didn't quite. e, they are ready for this and began to worry very much about this, and metaphorically, this can be compared with a cherry orchard, and with ranevskaya, who worries about the passing times, there is yermolaya lopakhin from brussels, who has a specific plan, and according to the cutting down of this forest, the earlier one yearns. e, yermalai lopahi, persistent. and as we recall, yes, in the

background already. the sound of axes is heard cutting this very, uh, but hmm watching how it all ended for everyone. nobody was badly hurt. it seems to me that the chekhovs are here. well, the company has forgotten. only who in this story is firs interesting, here is this firs. it seems to me that president vučić, who generally found himself between a rock and a hard place, on the one hand, he seems to be pro-russian and very, so to speak, quite a pro-russian mood in at the same time, serbia must do all things with europe, so here 's what to do, but in my opinion. uh, serbian foreign policy is determined by two circumstances. the first is the motive of national survival. but the fact is that in the 20th century serbia experienced, but in fact, three national catastrophes. the first world war, the second world war nineties great human losses, every fifth person. every tenth died in the first world war, and the second world war and in the service definitely do not want a repetition of this disaster. they don't want damage. yes, that is, and if you wait - how is it? it seems to me, their

installation, but on the other hand. if we look again at the structure of relations in the region, it turns out that the situation is the same. serbia is not so bad, because in recent years a lot of investments have come to the region along european lines alone. uh, more than 14 billion euros not only for serbia yes the entire region yes but serbia is one of the main recipients of this money. and there is not only this money, but there is a big upgrade in the infrastructure, new ports, new railways it-sphere, and a new company is coming to serbia and , to some extent, other countries. this is not such a periphery as it was the last 10 people in the expert environment here? i refer rather to such a euro-atlantic opinion. yes, there is such a thesis that the foreign policy neutrality of serbia , uh, it concerns only the military sphere, that is, we are military neutrality, and politically we are not a neutral state. yes, we are still committed to one line or another, but this was

emphasized by the state position. it's rather expert position state position. she is more careful. well, the motive is clearly expressed here, so to speak, and gizma, that is, this is a reliance on international law, and an attempt to prick to catch, uh, both sides, not only moscow but also brussels, on all sorts of international precedents. yes, and the kosovo situation. here it is very strongly used, again, i repeat, not only to reproach moscow, but also to reproach the forces that, in principle, tore this region away from serbia, it is appropriate here. remind, of course, that ukraine is a country that did not recognize, kosovo does not recognize kosogo for his own reasons, and here there are certain motives for understanding, of course, the belgrades. here is kursovsky, uh, the kosovo factor is a problem to teach. uh, it seems like he participated in some attempts, uh, to agree to find a political solution, then, on the contrary, he took a sharp position. eh, dry matter. now something is happening on the part of the settlement. or

put it all aside. a. well, look. uh, the kosovo situation, it is characterized somewhere. with a traditional speaker, there periodically occurs some kind of bursts in bursts of incidents as well, but this has been going on for many years, basically. uh, with some periodicity here, probably there is nothing new, but, again, the question is much more interesting about what the structure of regional relations is like here , and not only about belgrade and pristina, but also neighboring countries, which, for example, include macedonia and albania and which , uh, are now forming some kind of integration association that is not the european union. it is in his area of ​​interest. it is called open balkans or balkan skill schengen a out of 10 is actually an interesting situation. because if you look at some regional diplomatic agenda, it turns out that in the creation of this regional union it can be

called a customs union, or some kind of economic union, it turns out that while serbia and albania, that is, early they are somewhere interested in that it took place, and kosovo, that is, pristina, and it sabotages these efforts in every possible way. uh, justifying this by saying that firstly, and this is not european integration. this is not honored in the eu and now we want in the eu in kosovo they don't want eu membership, but on the other hand. uh, they're talking about the so -called economic expansion was hail. and this is confirmed. because if you remember a few years ago came. they even imposed customs barriers of a duty of 200% on serbian goods a and e, pristina, these efforts are sabotaged quite consistently and it turns out that serbia albania yes, they have a common interest somewhere in order to appease this one somewhere a rather destructive position is considered to be that

bosnia is a constant and persistent headache because once there was an active agreement, but since then russia has been accused of national building more than once, uh europeans americans for allegedly ruining blocky flirts what is happening there now. three months ago, on february 28, representatives of the republika srpska, miloradodik, announced that bosnia and herzegovina would not join any of the west's sanctions against russia politician also stressed that the bosnian serbs will not support bosnia's accession to nato, which is especially important during the current crisis in ukraine . according to the dayten agreements of 1995 , the country's authority is essentially the presidency of bosnia and herzegovina. the trium rada, which includes one representative each from the three main ethnic groups of bosniaks, slavs, orthodox serbs who converted to islam, and catholic croats.

all important decisions in battle. with it, the consensus of three parties must be taken. true, the last word remains not even behind them, but behind the foreign supreme, whose representative is appointed by the un security council, this is a foreigner, equidistant from all conflicting parties. for almost 12 years this post was occupied by an austrian slovene. valentin intsko, and on august 1, 2021, he was replaced by a german. christian schmidt in besson's nose could not approve his candidacy due to the position of russia and china moscow and beijing want to abolish the post of high representative so that bosnia can become truly sovereign the collective west opposes the state. appears in press narratives. and the idea that bosnia and herzegovina is destined, supposedly fell apart

into several parts, but, it seems to me that this is not the only possible future for this territorial entity numbness, but perhaps the scenario of, uh, some internal transformations of political transformations, is more likely, but related to interchangeable elites and what will follow after this, but the big question, of course, and some kind of crisis is possible, eh, but uh, i would say what is eh what, here is the second scenario, it is somewhat more likely. and what is the problem of bosnia herzegovina and the current political system is very complex built on many compromises. it really provides stability, but economically it is stability, it is provided by external funding, mainly european funding and in our terminology. this is the south one. unprofitable region and uh, definitely not happy with this. uh, some european countries. this

does not suit germany and the new so-called high representative. this viceroy of the european union is in fact one of christian schmidt a and what is curious, if earlier career diplomats were usually appointed to this position, then the peasants schmidt he, in the past was, the minister of agriculture of the german government, that is, in fact, they sent to the south, the business executive is one to rake, as they say, some well-known principles. ours was exactly the same. so uh, if we look at some german sources, they talk about the need to establish a hard hand. uh, the pressure on the local elite and the question is, uh hmm where this could lead thanks. alexander pivovarenko from the guidance conditions institute was with you. the balkans and its environs, more precisely , southeastern europe, a space more than saturated with military potentials according to

the global fire power analytical center, turkey has the strongest army in the balkan region, it is also the main support of nato forces in the balkans of its armed forces there are more than 700,000 people, 3,000 tanks and 11,000 armored vehicles, hundreds of artillery pieces and rocket launchers. including russian s-400 anti-aircraft missile systems in the service of the turkish air force are more than 600, aircraft, of which 200 are fighters, mostly american in 16, the turkish navy is also the most powerful in the region in the greek army, there are half as many people, but there are still more thousands of tanks. about 6,000 armored vehicles and over 150 rocket launchers. the air force is still inferior to the turkish, and the park of the military fleet. comparable with turkish only by the number of frigates of submarines and patrol ships corvette, there are no greeks, in general, but mine tra to

only three armed forces of romania serve 100.000 soldiers officers are armed with american patriot rocket launchers and m142 haymovs, but the romanian air force is represented by obsolete mig -21 fighters and 60 helicopters, too, mainly, the soviet naval forces are also weak queen mary frigate former british f95. london was launched almost half a century ago by the armed forces. serbia has about 80,000 soldiers and officers, 300 tanks and 1,200 armored vehicles. in recent years. the country is free. received from russia six mig-29 30 armored reconnaissance and patrol vehicles brdms and t-72ms tanks serbian fleet of military aircraft is represented by ten fighters and 17 attack aircraft, as well as 50 helicopters of which four uda although the

country does not have access to the sea, but the river flotilla operates on the danube the croatian army is half the size of the serbian. in terms of numbers, composition, the situation is similar with armored vehicles, tanks and artillery installations of only missile systems. croatia has more attack helicopters than serbia, but has 12 fighters four of them purchased in ukraine and modernized mig-21 in the bulgarian army, the basis of the air force is the soviet su-25. last year, the country signed a contract for the purchase of 12 french-made rafael fighters that will replace the mig-21 and mig-21 bis. less than 10,000 people serve in the slovenian army, while the country's military budget of $ 550 million allows spending much more per soldier than its balkan neighbors.

the turn of the century swept through the balkans crushingly from the most prosperous socialist a state envied by many to be tormented by national religious wars and foreign interference. then it seems to be the end of history in the european union and that's it, and here europe is in a fever. no one knows what the european project will be like in 5-10 years, but for the balkans there was no other scenario, except for integration into the eu . no, plan b but wait for new upheavals for all societies. depopulation is typical there, because so many have left their countries, an acute problem of aging. ask an ordinary person in zagreb that if because of ukraine the whole european union will ban at the seams, if a big war starts the answer that you will get we are all too tired to fight. look at politicians. they periodically wave warlike banners, but to whom people

leave to fight, they send money transfers home. them. need a job. earnings, of course, there are veterans who are unhappy, but they are no longer warriors of age. so the return of the wars of the nineties is unlikely. in the extreme case, socio-economic chaos and instability. but yes no plan b. no, that's completely accurate. we have often been told that the collapse of the ussr was sparingly lucky to have avoided the worst yugoslav scenario. hurry up. in our open spaces, the delimitation with a new drawing of borders turned out to be simply postponed. what the yugoslav experience teaches, the craving for the former unity has not returned, of course, in the imagination of people there is nostalgia quite often, even in croatia, many talk about the past. what a good time social justice stability, no need to worry about tomorrow, but these are nothing more than images. there are no organized political forces that would appeal to yugoslav ideals. the legacy

of the war is too strong to dream of a revival. i must say that they remember that era. in general , positively with more sympathy than here in russia the soviet union is remembered in general, there is no way back, only forward, so that it does not mean after advertising we will go to another hemisphere. summit america this year is special and also influenced by events in distant eastern europe on the polaris wi-fi collection control your equipment from anywhere in the world, this is when it is easy to choose a high interest rate on a deposit and quickly transfer

money there, one platform for deposits in different banks. only now we raise the rate by 5%. bonus for your first deposit in any bank in finus lug, register and open a deposit online . good fellow laugh. if you see a zebra , skip it. if the traveler is traveling, on the right we give way by right to the order, observe and live and live. be sure that with a credit savings card you have the most favorable conditions 120 days without interest

free service forever rate of nine and eight percent. apply online or at a branch for a credit savings card, the most profitable in the country. my name is sergey and i am not an actor. i am an online delivery product assembler and found this job on hh.ru. on hh.ru. there is a job for everyone. marina, remember the love that the artist gives to the viewer. she always comes back. you understand what a cashback percentage for everything marinochki is already high, and i an increased free card with a 5% cashback on the whole

discovery. let me treat you to a mix from tele2 50 gb of movie music added and a discount on smart devices. we supplement the ideal ingredients in one subscription already at a bargain price, and the first connection is free. i'm sure, maybe in a new way, what's for sure? what is it like? it works comfortably and safely. fast payment system a new method of contactless payment for purchases

los angeles hosted the summit of america meeting of the leaders of all american states the previous one was in 2018 around the forum always there was enough noise, as a rule, because of the conflict between washington and havana, and then caracas, but this year everything, especially. nervously, the biden administration did not invite the autocrats of cuba's venezuelan leaders to the event. and nicaragua, in response, changed their minds to go the leaders of mexico, bolivia, honduras , guatemala and el salvador sent lower-level delegations, and the president of brazil was sonar. right before the trip and the first meeting with biden, donald trump's like-minded person publicly doubted that he had honestly won the elections of the twentieth of the year, biden's leitmotif is democracy of all countries, unite against russia and china, the second in

the region is very actual, beijing is methodically expanding cooperation with latin american states, and the blues in the region will talk with juan pablo prada lallanda, professor of the independent university, benami rita in mexico why this time there are especially many there is a political and ideological fragmentation of the whole world around this summit and latin america is part of this we cannot forget the time of trump when the us was derailed and multilateral cooperation and integration ideas the us wants to consolidate its position on the world stage, and in the western hemisphere, primarily to counteract expansion. china but the united states wants everyone to play by their rules, namely that the participants meet the formal criteria of democracy, so they exclude some countries. this does not enjoy the support of many other states, as a result, not unification, but separation, however, occurs. the context itself is somehow

unfavorable tangled rather strange insist on a democracy versus auto approach. but at the same time, it is striving to ensure that venezuelan oil returns to the market, there are no very serious challenges ahead of american policy, of course , against the backdrop of the ukrainian crisis. the united states needs oil, a natural source of venezuela in mexico , for example, there is simply not enough oil, but for this it is necessary to establish relations with venezuela, formal and informal maduro. us support is needed to maintain power, however, it is not yet clear whether the americans are ready to go for this if the war and the crisis continue. continue, i think washington will have to move towards the oracus it will be interesting to see. on december 2, 1823, in his annual message to congress , us president james monroe outlined the basic principles of his policy towards the states of the

american continent. holy alliance russia prussia austria return spanish dominance over lata on the american colonies, which proclaimed independence, the monroe doctrine became the answer of the united states should not interfere in the internal affairs of european countries, and the state of europe in the internal affairs of america, any attempts by european powers to impose their political system on the american state or to acquire new colonies in the western hemisphere were considered as hostilities and an attempt on the national security of the united states but this did not prevent the united states themselves from conducting colonial policy on the continent, later the

monroe doctrine was repeatedly used to justify us intervention in the affairs of latin american states, for example, to justify the invasion of mexico in 1846 or to explain the entry into the war with spain in 1898, after which almost all spanish colonies in the pacific ocean and the caribbean sea the united states remembered the doctrine and during the intervention in cuba, haiti, nicaragu, panama and colombia, the monroe doctrine was in effect for almost two centuries until the united states abandoned it in 2013. everybody knows they recalled the historical monroe doctrine for the last time in washington under trump. and now she is acting. the us understands that latin america is no longer their backyard. we are now different nationalism is increasing here. and it has a growing influence on our foreign policy. this summit only confirms this. you

see how many countries refuse to accept the line that the united states is proposing . american influence in the region is declining and this is another challenge. their foreign policy is already too many challenges. biden. would like to use this summit to consolidate american positions, but now it won't work when you talk about nationalism. this is nationalism of various kinds, left right, so quite right. latin america is extremely diverse. this is a kind of planning cauldron, there are both left and right and different types of nationalism. but it grows everywhere. nothing good in no, because nationalism leads to fragmentation of the region, and the summit - it only aggravates. and what feelings does the conflict in ukraine evoke in vosinskaya america? we see that the countries of the region as a whole are trying, well, to refrain from expressing a position, but first of all, these events look very distant from here,

of course, no one supports the war latin america itself has suffered enough from the violence of wars and invasions, by the way, primarily from invasions from united states the united states in the late 19th and early 20th centuries occupied cuba twice during the second occupation, the american guantana base, bay, was founded there in 1915-1916 command of the general. john peshida invaded several hundred miles of mexican territory in 1912 the united states captured and occupied nicaragua for 20 years, and from 1915 to 34 haiti from 1916 to 24 american troops were in the dominican republic and in the sixty-fifth they organized military coups there held puppet elections april 17

sixty the first year the us tried to overthrow fidel. castro on the playa giron. landed one and a half thousand cuban mercenaries trained and equipped by the cia, but they were castro in 3 days on september 11, 73 in chile, with the support of the united states, the military path of the alienda president took place, one of his former associates , general august, pinochet, a military dictatorship reigned in the country in the seventy-seventh, the americans unleashed the civil war in el salvador, and on october 25 - 83 years more than 7,000 us military invaded grenada, where the leftist government of maurice bishop was overthrown shortly before , but his former companions took power 6 years later on december 20, 1989 the us invaded panama with the aim of overthrowing the manuel government in riga and adopting

a regime loyal to washington in order to control the panama canal from 81 to 89. the us provided the main military and financial support to the nicaraguan contrast. in their war with the marxist government of the sandinistas, we condemn the war, but many countries also reject sanctions, such as mexico, the position of the mexican government - this is a signal not even to moscow, but to washington that we will not act on his instructions, we are different and we independent. well, of course, the ukrainian conflict will have a great impact on world affairs for latin america. we look at the huge financial assistance that the united states provides to ukraine and we understand that nothing like this is close to us. latin america is losing some of its significance in the international arena. all attention, again on europe, published latin america understands that the conflict began, actually, not in

february, 22 years. it was simply the culmination of a long process, when the united states involved ukraine with its sphere. yes, here it is understood that the difference between today and latin america that was a few years ago is that we have many more different sources of information thanks to a smartphone in modern communications. it's not like it used to be when cnn or the bbc were the main source. so there are a lot more different opinions than before, for example. compare the twitter of the russian and ukrainian embassies, mexico city, and there and there there is support for the mexicans, but i must say that the russian representation has more, in general, the russian position of latin america is gradually gaining. thank you, our mexican interlocutor says that nationalism, emphasizing one's own identity, is the main trend in latin america. and what is more important for identity than national symbols, for example, the capital of a report from argentina on december 6,

1880, buenos aires was officially declared the capital of the republic of argentina even then it was the most populous city in the country, but then in a young country its population barely reached 500,000 inhabitants. today in buenos aires constantly about 3 million people live and 3 million more. recently, president alberta fernandez proposed to move the capital to the provinces every day. i'm thinking about whether the capital should be somewhere other than buenos aires, maybe it should be moved to the north to give this part of the country all the potential that any capital has, maybe the ministry of the city, the mining industry, it is better to be in a mining province , and the ministry of fisheries to be somewhere in the fishing ports of patagonia, the whole life of the country is concentrated in buenosli. however thoughts about changing the capital for several decades have

not left power back in 1986. president raul alfonsín proposed moving the capital to the patagonia region, where cities such as vietma, rio negro and carmen de patagons are located, according to elfonsín. this was supposed to decentralize the country, reduce bureaucracy and territorially separate political power from economic power, it was planned to invest in the argentine province and revise the state structure as a whole, transfer various political and representative offices to the south of the country. functions, for example, the ministry and oil companies in cities such as comadora rio dave or trilla, but since patagonia was considered an underdeveloped region. this was doubtful, voiced by the incumbent president alberta fernandez, until it was developed, there were no public opinion polls, so we went outside to find out what the people of buenos aires themselves think, but lived in the

province for some time. most felt the difference. and they come to buenos aires for education and work in search of better opportunities, if the capital located in the center of the country, and not on the coast, people would have more work, all economic activity is concentrated. here, the capital of porto , i think that the transfer of the capital to the province would stimulate the development of the economy and tourism. it would help to better distribute goods. however, any medal. there are two sides. among the passers-by, there are many who were not born in buenos aires, but at the same time are categorically against the transfer of the capital to another part of the country. there is no question of this and there can be no question of buenos aires - this is buenos aires and will remain so. despite everything, this is our city, our culture, this question is not even worth raising. they want to transfer the ministry to the province, but all the documentation, all the administrative part, will remain

here, this will entail. add. well, there are cities in which an extensive system of state administration is distributed over different regions, but they have a key element that is not in argentina in many countries of the world, the capital is removed from the center due to a developed system of railways and roads, such as in paris or in london, that is, people can live 45 km from the capital, but at the same time get there quickly and without problems with ayres, it faces other problems that affect the well-being of the population, many of its residents, for example, do not have access to life on the necessary sewerage services and lack drinking water. it's all about the uneven distribution of the population, a third of all the inhabitants of the country are concentrated in a relatively small area. and how do you know the living conditions of people in large urban clusters are not very good and muzzle after more than 30 years.

many questions remain unanswered. indeed , president alfonsin's project is still relevant now, but the question of where to get the budget to transfer the executive judicial and legislative power to another part of the country still remains open? the plot of the week was sergey lavrov's talks in ankara, where the issue of grain exports blocked by hostilities in ukraine and the results were discussed. not yet known. although the persons involved make it clear that the process productive food theme. we have touched on it more than once and will return to it again. in the meantime, we note that there is one problem that is really important and there are two approaches to it; it seeks to avoid a shortage of food in the world and for this purpose to postpone military-political conflicts for a while, or to use this very shortage in order to

obtain additional advantages in the mentioned collisions, let us join the according to eduard zernin. the chairmen of the board of the russian union of grain exporters, which were announced on thursday at club discussions. valdai, by the way, after she intervened, again fau. the first time was probably a few weeks ago. they seriously stated that the problem should be solved for all participants. that is, when ukraine is the same for russian, yes, then only real progress appeared. here. i just want to thank the organization for its contribution. that is, and if it is the fau that will be more persistent in solving these problems. i'm sure that we can move on, that is, here, uh, no way here in our e business in our history should not be right and wrong. that is, in our history everything works very simply. we are engaged in the production of grain and its sale by delivery. uh, as for those in need inside the country, this is primarily for donat the fly agaric processing industry and, of course, bakery products,

a lot of the most diverse, uh, feed. on the basis of grain are produced, and abroad. that is, there it is the same way, in fact, two goals are food, and, uh, feed works like this. our business. he uh assumes that we just know each other ok. yes, we deliver fulfill our obligations independence from the situation. this is our part and we as a business will provide it, please decide. questions for us, so that such barriers do not arise, so that we do not solve problems that are not typical for us. let them solve their problems, trying not to interfere. the rest to decide their own , at least it seems reasonable to look at the international review, goodbye.

it's always interesting how it all starts. now you will see everything manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check.

at the nitrogen plant in severodonetsk, up to 400 ukrainian soldiers are blocked, and now they are discussing how the negotiations are organized. how many civilians can hold the bomb shelters of the creative landing force in the donbass in the republics are concerts in honor of the day of russia, festive performances and celebrations, including in the liberated territories. we went to the port for a couple of days, stayed for several months from the first days of the operation in kherson, a turkish ship was blocked, who provides the sailors with food, and when organized a safe corridor for passage through the black sea? how is cooperation between roscosmos and nasa being built under the current conditions and

what is more important, the search for extraterrestrial civilizations or the protection of the earth from asteroids about this and not only in an interview with the head of roscosmos immediately after the release of the news? approximately 400 ukrainian militants are blocked at the nitrogen plant in severodonetsk , lugansk russian ambassador rodion miroshnik said, and did not rule out that civilians could also remain there . they are located in other parts of the plant, according to the diplomat, contact has been established with the militants. they are trying to put forward their demands. so they ask to organize a corridor for the exit together with the hostages in the direction of lisichansk. miroshnik stressed that such conditions are unacceptable; instead , the blocked are offered to release civilians to stop resistance and surrender . in the donetsk republic, again shelling from ukraine, according to the joint center for control of the armed forces, opened fire 60 times per day , killing 5 civilians.