because the question will then be about the financial system. because everyone is afraid that this restructuring will indeed lead to degradation in conditions when we are deprived of our usual access to sources of technology. this, of course, is what everyone here wants to avoid. this is not a task. yes, setting tasks, of course, setting the task of modernization. just how. well, here, in order not to return to the soviet union, where was it? of course, you just need to look at private initiative differently without private initiative. technological development. it's not a question. there taxes are not a support issue. e from the budget of some projects. this is everything that is connected with the development of a private initiative. if it is allowed to manifest itself, then there will be the development of technologies for the development of innovations. and what we call modernization. well, everything around this should be this is the last question.

now i said the same thing, i say, if often the initiative is welcomed, you can just uh, without explaining what and why to say, and we will let it manifest itself. are you legislators? i think that here we have a more collective image on this panel. we will definitely give it well, but then we will actually move on to issues that, as i understand it, are not the main thing, because the main thing has already been discussed. uh, everything, worried. when to say, when is the time to say there is no money. here are the tasks outlined, we believe that really. well, probably the most important thing is to ensure that people's lives get better, at least remain competitive. here.

what is your role in addressing these tasks. the budget system, if possible, just so that we can have a more specific conversation, not, uh, the role of the budget system in general. uh, i'm still trying to move away from macroeconomics. they are not very good at understanding. uh, but who will be supported by the government of the very weak. how compatible is this with macroeconomic stability, because how to solve all these problems, but at the same time not start macroeconomic destabilization and not strictly fall off the new nineties. well, okay, you will answer this later, if i ask the next question. i'm in the previous one maybe i’ll say a few words, but really, these are all the current situation. it makes you look differently, probably, at everything that

turned out to be, well, it’s going well enough for us, and so on. i mean, they start training, you know, specialists in training russian technology, that is, starting from whether we ourselves need to produce, uh, automatically boxes, means transmissions or is it power windows, moisture? at the same time and now hmm you need to rethink everything, you understand, and indeed we understand that the emphasis should be own forces and on our friendly partners. here in this direction. we will have here and the achievement of these, say, the achievement of goals, based on the new situation. as for the budget of the strong and the weak, whom to support in general, i would like to first say that the budget is a very complex instrument. it is a tool on the one

hand and creation, and on the other hand a tool. eh, it can be such a source of destruction. here it is very important to find this edge, because now we hear let's get more funding. let's invest more there, don't we look at our financial resource capabilities. yes it may be, but a permanent policy. uh, so the policy of such imbalances cannot continue, because this is ultimately, if we go back to the beginning of our discussion. this will come to inflation, will come to a decrease in the income of the population, and this will ultimately come to a decrease in the life of our citizens, therefore medicines. this is such a budgetary it should not turn into a drug, which is understandable for what uh, so the consequences uh, so we can come, so we have, uh, accumulated a whole lot of experience. here are

the overcomings. uh, means fiscal policy of this kind of difficult stages of crises. if you want to say, if i may say so, therefore we know how to do it and we know how to pursue a budget policy, but here the question is to go between the reference, what is called a charybdis in this situation and now we need to support only that. what is the first thing to ask? yes, exactly those new technologies that we talked about, which have now become less accessible to us. yes, it's electronics. this, means our numbers. these are the, uh, means productions that require. uh, restoration and reproduction is already our own hands. here's what we need to support now. and of course, in this situation, when there are big risks, by the way, speaking, i want to say that the enterprise profited as it was. so it remained. and many now even make good

money on this situation. so therefore it is necessary to do so that the happiness of the risks that business has. it took the state, perhaps the head of the stages somewhere in the subsidize there is not know under subsidize interest rates, somewhere. the most important thing is to give confidence in the sale of their products. namely, this is all somewhere, maybe, you know, like at the end of these. yes , guarantee returns and so on. it is in this vein that the budget should now, uh, help help. e entrepreneurs. that's why. uh, rebuilding the world of help we have a lot of budget support right now, but perestroika is exactly on e. those, uh, means sectors with which are at risk, in which, so to speak, we see on the one hand, but with on the other hand, one should never forget about budgetary stability. that's what i'm always talking about, because if we're just that up to one slack we are here. eh, can bring in completely different. uh, so let's

take a case, let's say turkey, argentina, where inflation is seventy eighty percent. we need it. no, of course not, so once again i repeat that you need to be very careful. eh, a decision on e means budget restructuring, which is certainly taking place now and which will take place, but this must be done taking into account the provision. uh, macro-sei macro, stability, as if i'm sorry, here again , purist. you plan to buy a kitchen for every buyer of a kitchen with a cedar countertop, a 40% discount on a mattress from a partner’s factory, ask kitchen drivers for

a cedar countertop and buy a mattress 40% cheaper. that is, here, if in other times we are ready to remember there, er fitness, someone else there. but the crisis is kings, and we are all with him, so i still have a question in this regard. what are the risks today, i don't think we need to say that it's all the same now the crisis is a very serious crisis. what risks are prepared take over the budget, that is, conditionally debt to the cash gap. here we have colossal social payments there by decision of the president. here is a solution to the problem of inequality, about which everyone said that it is very important or this. for example, the budget is ready to take on specific

investment projects in those industries that you yourself called now are breakthrough or finally. here we believe that the budget policy should be based on the introduction of new taxes on business. somehow the optimism in the hall at these words by the citizens decreased. there's a better way here. everything fine. everyone smiled here, but i would like to understand what risks you are now ready to take on precisely in connection with the second part of the question, so as not to fall off, at the same time, not to fall, uh, into macroeconomic destabilization, because we all remember the nineties, this is also no one wants. how much a bottle of milk or a loaf of bread will cost in a store depends, among other things, on this. i think a number of decisions have already been made. first, we took e, that is, we made a decision to support people under income, the second we took the risks of increasing the cost of loans in the economy, yes, and helped e topic

broadcasts, which means that this support is required, we subsidized interest rates. yes , we, uh, as the main thing, too, uh, how to say the risk that we had was to stop the suspension of these projects that were being implemented and indeed we decided that, despite all uh, uh, restrictions, continue to pursue that economic policy, which we outlined earlier is also, by the way, a very important decision. we are not stopped in this connection. that's why what risks we could take on again, i repeat that in the conditions when we need to produce more of our own e goods of our own products, which we used to import now ready-made and probably need to take certain risks, the sale of these goods still says, these are offset contracts. yes, in the state you can say, let's produce, uh. hmm, we produce uh, that means an airbag.