that is, well, not well, if zelensky imagines himself to be a neuron, although this is somewhat, a different era, but he simply liked to quote. virschy, looking at the hot rome which, by the way, turned out to be a historical anecdote did not correspond to reality, but to fight the christians. yes , it was at a certain stage in roman history. but just think about it, a man who calls himself a catholic is proud of his audience with the pope of rome, the second president of the united states is a catholic. george what is his name junior? declares in all seriousness my next administration i think we have more lgbt+ people in our administration than in all the past combined. yes, that's exactly what i meant. coming to power, he promised that

our administration would be like america in every sense. we have done. this is a record number of appointees given to the city at all levels of our government. it says, katulik, he generally read the bible, let me remind you with the wind. the covenant is leviticus the book of levi where it is very harshly said. what will happen to a man who lies with a man like women let me remind you that in the covenant it is very strictly written that i will not find muzhiks. the kingdom of heaven. this is a verbatim quote. i have nothing against. let the lgbt people live plus or minus on the side of the cake. is it just lily or are you a catholic? or are you lgbt plus? well, it's just impossible to combine all this at the same time. it

's just false. and most importantly, when a person gets a job, he must now also determine his professional qualities, and his orientation. what is this all about? that is, and this is what western values ​​are now. well i probably somehow differently i imagined the great west and its values ​​and now it’s somehow very strange, they ask the girl whom the evil sidorov called chunga-changa, and her name is actually karina jean-pierre. here she said, karen genpeer just quietly asked her, listen, there saudi arabia banned lgbt toys and then she suffered, we work around the world to protect lgbt plus people treated abuse to

criminalize discrimination stigmatization, as well as empower local lgbt plus movement and individuals. we do it through otherworldly multilateral channels, expressing official concern to the governor's government, both publicly and privately, coordinating our efforts with kinky minded people and offering emergency assistance to lgbt+ individuals through our foreign programming aid program. we support the civic common view of the individual by the community, and he says this plus tools are a resource for repulsion mitigation and recovery from violence discrimination and stigmatization, we consider human rights. universal and where is lgbt plus written in human rights? those human rights that they refer to official there 40 of some year there is something to find nothing is said little. this is what i imagine. yes, this is it, they will now start in the arab countries. okay, but what about the

vatican? is everything all right? no, at least not officially. well, that is, he will arrive now in perim and say, but show me where you have lgbt plus what the pope will tell him that so minus somewhere plus somewhere minus. well , jokes, but seriously and they are trying to destroy russia, after all, the hatred that they had for trump. now it has been transferred to putin, then it will be transferred to china. for them, china is not so scary, because civilizationally for them, china is not an internal competitor, it is in its own clearing. that is, he, as it were, is not trying to show, guys, that you are. and of course, we are extremely dangerous. fun time we live dmitry time, of course, fun, but on the other hand, it is to a certain extent honest,

because the more these people talk, um, the more america learns about itself well, if the biden administration is blind to america, well, something from this america has long been wrong or something is wrong with the administration in general, of course , that's when they disagree so much. uh, what is called structure and representativeness, u power and population, in general it is called ethnic chimera yes america it is quite obvious that it is beginning to be realized, therefore, the scenario. i think saudi arabia learned a lot about itself arab countries muslim countries, for example, in the far east and they found out about themselves what the americans want to do with them. hmm in my opinion, very good. uh, a good lesson in honesty for hmm saudi arabia for qatar united arab

emirates oman there and so on, but if no one learned the lesson of egypt and the revolution about tahren squares , well, please tell you. how will the americans get into, and inside the political life of the saudi kingdom. i think that only fighting for lgbt rights is a plus, by the way, is there any discrimination in this? here she says lgbt plus. there are also a lot of letters, this is a plus. yes, but we must talk about everything, after all, is there some kind of discrimination and stigmatization of those who did not fall into the first four letters in this. i think that there are girls here, you have to work very hard on yourself. vladimir zakharova has already proposed to defend the rights of the guitar of sexuals and they ask who is she ready to become a breast for the protection of heterosexuals in such a photo posted and asked who many signed up with me. i think, what give, in every joke there is a share of a joke, and i

'm afraid that in a few years in a number of countries. well, first of all in europe, i think that in the usa it will not come to that, and in some european countries it will have to protect the rights of heterosexuals. but we are all well aware of the quota principle of hiring in large western corporations. it is clear who has the advantage in today's political environment? well, in fact, people will hide their heterosexual, yes, and mimic this, as she says lgbt plus no need to hide behind impotence, if you please prove it. well, the students are also asked about their affiliation. here, too, you are determined. hmm , it develops into tragedy when these jokes, these jokes that we poisoned 10 years ago , become part of political practice. and you can ask dmitry for this. i’m just now thinking from here, if lgbt values ​​are declared, plus this

means that war is being declared on islam and judaism. orthodoxy, all catholicism, all abrahamic is absolutely not in the mystical region, but 10. uh, why is the situation in ukraine important? because the situation in ukraine has shown how it is really possible to conduct a religious war in the 21st century on a plane, not in the information space, not in the virtual space, but on the field on the plane. well, look who we are with her, but we are already openly at war with the satanists azov aidara banned in russia well, this is pure satanism. and this is pure everything that does, including europe in ukraine, this is an unequivocal religious war of europe against. yes, er nominally

against orthodox christianity against christianity associated with hmm the russian orthodox church, but after all, this is a war against christianity, in principle, this is the destruction of the foundations of christianity. and i must say once again that the vatican takes an active part in this. the vatican seems to have gotten too small in its frayed cassocks, and they want to come up with some somewhat broader generalization of the social spectrum. but this is, uh, a very dangerous thing. the further. you are moving away from religion. hmm, the more satan becomes your employee of god, so, who simply performs certain functions from the point of view of these people, and then it is permissible, but to kiss. uh, the flag of the right sector of gold and so on. it 's okay. abnormally few. it turned out dr.

zasnovsky. the pope was not politically correct enough. she did not condemn russia therefore, she will be expelled. come on, let's see, i think twice the projectile. i disagree with dr. i think two times the projectile in the same funnel. it won't happen in such a short amount of time. don't want to start a nursing home, dad, yes, that's it. well, you just understand, and hmm , the institution of the papacy, and can not turn into a joke. and two dads can’t now, but how was it all dad? yes, of course, everything was rather a process . and, by the way, speaking, there was quite a lot of it , but that's not the point. the fact is that well, that's

right before our eyes. yes, and then the third. that's right there . well, i say, yes, well, who is this, and this is our dad, right? the question is different. and we see a new world. and indeed, such a phrase is the key that they pronounce. and we mean that this is where russia was, who will be with russia, they will fall on the wrong side of history. and what is that and what is that side of history, but who is with them on the other side of the history of the theomachist, that's the thing, while this is the tradition of idolatry, if you look at almost all the enemies of russia they were all theomachists, that is, that hitler of all variations of religion are involved in the occult. there, with the mixed nietzschewagner and everything else,

it was not so european still not cleared up, but now lgbt q but in reality in reality. now, if you look at that, uh, in the direction of history, where it stands now, and what is called the collective west , which looks less and less like a collective, because these three plus one, who arrived by train, and you you know, they don’t impress people on their own if a former kvnschik talks to them, like this through a lip in a t-shirt in a t-shirt . this is a very important signal, that is, it comes from the fact that this is a courier. well, yes, god would him, and couriers brought pizza and sushi. but if you look at who is on that side of them, the story that they consider

correct, but you will, of course, excuse me, but this is the world, not even the twentieth or nineteenth century. this is something very deeply archaic, in which they want to push us. and the last very last thing i want to say. this is the fight against god, satanism , the annihilation of existence, it manifested itself, including the fact that of all the possible options for the further continuation of the crisis in ukraine, it is the west that chose the option to fight to the last ukrainian. yes , zelensky agreed with this, but they also proposed this. no calls, no attempts to go back towards negotiations again. and now, let's not narrow down whether we need or don't need it, but on their part there is no urge towards negotiations. this means that they are using the potential of the current crisis to the maximum to

impose this anti-christian god-fighting hmm god-fighting situation. for us , here the question arises that we are vulnerable precisely from an ideological point of view. yes we are withstood the economic military. we do not, but from an ideological point of view, we have problems and electricity. well, in ideology, i don’t know what kind of trap to pull. eh, in this hung conversation there are a lot of nocturnal sergeevich tsipkov, as soon as this article was mentioned to him. i noticed it, i immediately read it. the fact is that i know very well from sergeevich the tenacity of the soviet era, i was a lot of friends with him. what can i tell you about him, but at least soon he e so boldly, as he said e threw the entire russian public to all intellectual layer. e in the face. uh, your revelation putin dictator

that's where it starts. i will tell you. all the truth is already beginning to be discussed, that is, with an open gathering of power. he is already in leforto. no, he is not, the dictator or from peter and paul wrote no , well, this is sympathetic. yes, this is not a very original statement. in order to plant him for this even in our harsh times. well, the fact is that alexander sergeevich is always his friends for here, in fact, for portunism, here are the words opportunism in russian political language and in western political language has different opposite concepts. uh, empty, we have since the time of bolshevism. an opportunist is someone who has defected to the side of the enemy and accepted other people's ideas . here's another one. and so, on the contrary, this is a man of compromise, who was forced or

somehow otherwise into an alliance from the opposite side. uh, there it's positive. we're negative. sergeevich's father has always been e. it's just that there is a man there, but the main thing i want to say is that he has reached, er, with all his accumulated knowledge. oh yes, first of all, he is in love with poland here it was right that this was his ideal of poland at the time of the commonwealth, or let's take solidarity, but in any case, this explains a lot. eh, but the main thing for our general conversation is, after all, not tenaciously in the fact that many russian intellectuals have gone through such a classic path, which is collaborating, that they are collaborating with the authorities. and he still boldly wrote the soviet era. i just know, here, uh fights with power at the same time, then enters

directly. e to work in power, that too here is something normal for an enlightened person. here but in the end they understand that here they are personally with their hmm er with their own with those who and like-minded people can do nothing with this power . well, she seems to be evil. and why does she keep holding on holding on and so on. to the fall of many, uh, russian intellectuals, uh, they begin to accuse the people of the matter is not in power, power has always kissed. he writes like this. here, well, in russia it has more words than in other countries, but this is the last but the people from here are this cultural inferiority and so on, not the same. yes, it doesn’t come, another genius, all the people, not here. all chubais, the people are not here. these are directly russian horror films of russian relations with the intellectual

people, so that it would not be noticed, if the modification is such that the article, at the same time, did not separate the democratic ukrainian regimes in every possible way and did not say that here in the kremlin i think myths, including confusing, that there are some nazi nationalists. it says to me, dear aunt vodose, and she told me . that there are no nationalists here, but there is one per hundred, well, one per hundred, what can such an argument of the murderous alexander sergeevich do here? in general, he is ukrainian. it also appeared in it. he once distinguished himself by the fact that he also has ukrainian blood. he spoke directly about it to everyone, so i'm not revealing anything here. so this is the way here this is no crime, medina ukrainian blood. yes, and matvienko ukrainian blood. almost all of us have. the head of the country in one form or another will return in general,

i definitely do not have a general opinion about ideology. well of course, already sergeyevich ideology. i mean tenaciously, and not pushkin can no longer offer us anything constructive in this sense. in addition to the fact that we are all culturally or full-fledged, by the way, he quotes authors of the early 20th century. here is the evidence. he quotes only from the beginning of the 20th century, the wind of modern literature. apparently he is not very found not among those, and among those who are ashamed to kiss, so we constantly complained and discussed here that we have no ideology. there is no ideology how to develop here, well, someone said that there is patriotism, this is

hello. i'm already in the crimea, the weather is wonderful 30 °. no one rushes in the most interesting place, when i tell them about what i feel, they listen, but they do not hear. and that's bad. no one can rewrite our history. this is just one of the folders prepared by the soviet accusations for the international military tribunal in nuremberg, no one will close the borders for us. i will evaporate

always together always online. the internet is so strong. wow frozen won't break watching the masterpieces of the world documentary true hero. now we really miss the classics, new items , exclusives. without registration, we look in the application or on the site.

now, in my opinion, everything has been cut out. it is quite obvious that if we act only on the contrary. this is what is being said in the west. this is evil. well, here's lgbt power. so we shouldn't have lgbt power. and we should have straight people's power. such a strange word, well, it's clear, what are we talking about. yes, we simply do not need to ask the question initially, that is, who sleeps with whom and how, if this does not violate the criminal code, and please, all collapsed. uh, the basic uh pillars of the tenets of liberal liberalism, what's your private life?

this is your private business, and no one has to interfere there, but this should not affect anything , including that promotion. either one way or the other way there with this one with the right in private. actually. it's all been discussed. well, in this case, i mean specifically here. that second means that for a long time they undermined the narrow orthodox church as a separate issue. uh, i believe that religion is a classic die. well, how no matter how you twist it, uh it happens they are replaced by something else. here, uh, the soviet union failed. the communist ideology has uh completely uh, the religion is orthodox islam. and well , he dies, like everything dies from the moment of birth, but it’s clear. here are some. that's what christianity is, there are more than two thousand years. everyone dies and dies

. yes. well, those who expect the body starts before the age of 25. he, uh, that is, a man of such a classical life. it grows, develops, as if healthier, and then they begin gradually humanity dies becomes decrepit and insignificant, because, as the doctors say, everyone has died. therefore, humanity is now gently degrading and dying, so further. well, i'm just your own thought prolonging the logic. i affirm that in the case of a medical example, i understood it in order to explain that the process is inevitable in general, everything in this world, of course, this is definitely not what i said. this is the second time. i express my opinion. i have my own opinion, how do you yourself the universe was born once initially already finite, at least from one end you deny beam concept. how better it goes from somewhere, it goes where it doesn’t have, and the beginning of three rays, just the beginning. this is the other side of the end of nothing like

that, and it is not enough if you believe in god, but you do not believe in god. do you know that humanity in general is known to have the rainbow of the covenant which clearly explains this? we will not have anything to do with leading a discussion about what new world ideology or civilizational ideology within this former real, judas of christianity and euro-atlanticism there include the brezhnev east and russia, uh, it can take a long time, but at least the crisis phenomena. you just flowed out, that is catholicism, says the pope. and the papacy. well, where is his father, his mother? you see, the whole family is mistaken there, that is, they are good about themselves. i'll tell you, this is the postman, maybe you don't like it, right, but the letter take what is the speech, therefore, the message

of god what do you like? how did you count? he brings you so well with you not at all. and in anglicanism, who is the postman the queen exactly? here comes the american problem queen turns y'all out to some minister of the ministry to the minister of the minister of foreign affairs. and who is the head of the church is always the lord a. here they go further. here are the small positions declared, uh, war. well, of course, all religion, of course, you just didn't mention the queen. well, now, well, the queen has been silent for now, but i won’t be surprised that we are now reciprocal sans, then we will have to fuck the queen. i don't know, i don't know that. now, i'm surprised she is now, but she's the

head of the church is not surprised at anything. it is truth too. so i'm what it is now i'm high trilogy spoil. i'm generally in a positive sense about religion. i just think that so far nothing better has come up. let there be this traditional religion. so, if, uh, the west, in the person of its own, handed over the detachment, and the uk, uh, opposes the patriarch, and moscow all russia , by the way, i note that for some reason, but the change to the issues of children. well, it would seem that it is considered there with a shoulder that she allegedly gave ukrainian children the right to do so. this is part of such a false narrative of the british flier. we must stand up for strengthening of the russian orthodox church. that's just why you can find

several such positions. so, when i listen to a speech in st. petersburg at this very forum , economics in our ministers by many experts in economics, which many of whom would generally have to shoot themselves, since all their forecasts did not come true, and recipes that, by the way, uh, these most nobel prize winners in economics. there, half would have to , uh, just hang themselves from suffering for the capitals, because everything collapsed what they promised they offered predicted. what prescriptions were given? here i hear how harsh the reality of today's interstate struggle. moreover, apparently under the pressure of the instructions of vladimir vladimirovich putin, they are compiled, as it were, through the chains of economic liberalism, intellectual, which are their own, but somehow they are made very hesitantly. somehow so reluctant. offer to squeeze liberals out of yourself drop by drop.

i propose to pull off the chains at once, some radical reforms are needed. this, of course, is political - this is a terrible picture and a liberal, pulling off the chains and reforming. why is this horror of modern contemporary art that can decorate any exhibition, that she has something in new york, that in moscow she likes this horror no. horror. i don't like it, but to see how they pull it off is good. so i'm finishing up. eh, at its most important. unfortunately he talked about it. this is where i'll get to. it's happening so fast now. uh, the words are forecasts of those who spoke differently than everyone else, including in our country, about the economics of the politics of ideology, which we will see at school. it's me and the political system is rotten and outdated in everything in the modern world. i do not

accept islamic scans. i'm not scientists in this climb in their regimes. and i mean, here is our familiar to us this euro-atlantic world, our part of civilization, and the political institution is outdated. i have nothing against so don't like democracy. and how can one love or dislike one of the uh, mechanisms, uh of the management of society, that is, do not love this mechanism in any way, deny it, love it, like one of the yeah, but it is outdated on the fire shield must hang corcanus-shaped bucket. here is a hatchet wagon fire extinguisher and a pile of sand and a shovel. everything should be in some cases one another. i feel that the hand reaches for the hatchet, it's time to make a global political reform and russia should offer something. i have long proposed disbanding

all parties to liquidate. briefly, parliaments need to be formed on the basis of class. not in the sense, they are a hundredfold of this captivity. no, by profession, the most important profession in this country, which is held by the state, armed people hold kept to be education t-pedagogics teachers must hold on, you need to see each other to educate, which are also needed no well, just keep it there, and not who are the authoritative boys. yes , this is the death of civil society. she always finds it. yes, here. yes coolies professional measles. yes, the military estates of the estates here for 18 workers, hired workers are represented in our parliament. you represent all employees. we have all the deputies, probably workers and state

people called the supreme soviet there were representatives of the army of the creative intelligentsia only partly told the collective farmers, yes, the society should be an operational government for the next five years and a statistical government that plans and forecasts for 25 years in the form. they spoke. this is also a back. shhh asked comrade makarov absolutely wonderful person and a great specialist deputy of the state duma committee andrey mikhailovich just he said the real one, like an amateur, right? well , let's listen to another naftavaz offer. talk about solving these problems, what does it mean again a question of an amateur fan of the beatles or something else? that is, it is not here now. yes, because

the apparent economy of the soviet union was inefficient throughout history. i would not be in the subject, because it was closed. it was efficient because it was not competitive. she was inefficient because she was the centralized section of it all. no, of course, russia no, well, another model, what should be said about such a period of soviet history. of course he tries to tell, so that it is more accurate, because if she was inefficient, as she managed to defeat the most efficient european thirties forties are at the beginning of the gigantic. it 's impossible. if you liked these words of makarov or beatles, i myself benchal on the guitar. i'm a child myself what makes this song so? here. ah, why do we willingly use any

historical experience of any country, except for the historical experience of our own theatrical novel. yes , why write new ones there are such wonderful old ones, that is, our any search for new ways to show that why come up with political answers from writers to write or dreamers smart alcohol to look for political answers, therefore, that is, if you don’t like writing or who to look for, by the way, one good writer was even the founder of the genre and, you know, a good statesman turned out to be kylie beheld. the founder of the genre of military memorials, women's civilizations were all in sweden, it's like under communism, dad, uh, write poetry on the earth. it would be a long time ago in puffiness, too , it will be so. do you think you think that in

antiquity was easier than it is now, but if you look at the structure of a language, then the thinker of machine guns is not your plan, chapaev said everything, but at the same time, if you look at the structure of the language, then ancient languages ​​\u200b\u200bare much more complicated than modern ones. which indicates, well, enough to look at the grammar of the language, that is, to see how and what to compare with the current one, so it’s not necessary that humanity didn’t have such a task. still better than giant changes. look, we've had philosophers who are comparable to socrates. with pythagoras that they discovered a set of platitudes, this set of platitudes, because they were discovered, right. because the most difficult thing is to formulate simply in such a way that they later said, but this is necessary. and if you think that plato is a set of platitudes, well, do you know the theory of shadows is definitely not banal advertising? where

it all begins now you will see everything. but it's best to check. please, i will return a little to the beginning of our program, otherwise you were already going to reform the political system of the russian federation. as for the feelings of various representatives of the west towards russia, they

vary in strength and depth. here is passive hostility to metaphysical even existential hatred, but with those who, let's say passively. uh, we are quiet, she hates us so much, we won’t talk about her . but those who metaphysically hate us. i would divide them into two categories. the first is the so-called, well, the state, it is not up to the hole that cannot forgive russia, that is, the forces of historical power, which prompted the creation of the largest and pro-continental empire and the strongest power that allowed, well grind all e. enemies of the country in different historical eras, but these are the european backyards. eh, such tobacco jackals are, of course, poles, first of all. eh, these are the same ukrainians, the balts. and it’s clear that they still experience this metaphysical hatred, because we created the greatest russia, the russians created

the greatest culture of modernity, in fact, and we can talk about several cultural eras. yes, this is antiquity, this is byzantium, in fact. e, european flourishing and russian e. culture. behind if he says this, let's say about the western model and there is more. well, this is what i said, but such are the state's shortcomings, but there is a serious main opponent. these are, of course, the anglo-saxons, who, from a cultural point of view, they, uh, cannot hate us, because, uh, too, in general. uh, great empire great nation, but what makes us hate them, just recently a book came out, uh, russians about the main enemy. and there are collected works by ivan vernadsky and edrikhin van damme and andrey fursov, uh, troika like this in particular. uh, it is well shown there

that the anglo-saxons hate us because of the fear of, uh, this hypercontinental power that was russia, so they were always used by russia and in various ways by deceit and so on in all the wars of the major wars when russia was pulling the weight huge they are afraid. these are the dominants of the heartlind, and the core of the earth above the romanland. if we take the mackinders, therefore, it must be understood that we have here, but two such external opponents, but rather with russophobia outside it is impossible without defeating e, without destroying the russophobia inside and going to the program. i think lord, maybe vitaly tovich will still be, because he talks about internal enemies on his telegram channel. i even launched such a rubric, and who are the enemies and peoples. how do they fight him? i thought of twisted daughter as the first editor of the

independent newspaper editor-in-chief since the day of foundation and that you came up with this motto without anger or predilection. well, tazzitz, uh, well, i understand that's how you brought it. here approved, they say contributed by another person. i remember his last name points, i adopted this motto without rotten predilections. so here is the article. but in fact, of course, uh man. in general, i also know this author for a single year, a rarely stupid person, in fact, because, uh, the way he spoke, the way he spoke, by the way, the last article seemed to me. uh, as if copied from his work of the nineties . here are the quotes that he plucked from the collection from the depths. and now they still serve him, so they use this citizen

like, well, the same useful idiot, here are the anglo-saxons in their struggle against russia why because against the backdrop of a colossus? they never play. uh, with one uh, with a checker, the anglo-saxons for them the whole world, like a chessboard, vandamme wrote about this, which means, our geopolitician is a core, even yes, they don’t see the whole earth, how uh exactly. eh, the map is like a chessboard, they are osya. here it is a very good word, it feels it all and for them the representation of these figures. it 's really theirs. the big game is so, they never get off linearly, they say, long systemically. well, something, probably, is comparable with the game go and when there is a colossal first time in all 8 years such large-scale shelling of peaceful cities, when, from day to day, e, the

bombing is intensified by this. in our country, a series of publications suddenly appears that, moreover, someone writes under pseudonyms. eh, someone, let's say , under his last name on different resources. here are the last 2 weeks. and it's very good to observe even with some uh writers had to come into explanation they start talking about, wondering, like, why is this at all, and when will it end? yes, but the fact that we agreed that we, it turns out, are culturally inferior people. we cannot make the only correct decision, which is related to the fact that the wrong person is punished, as a result , he is in power. and by the way, on this writer from the independent he, uh, proposed candidates, which ones would suit him? yes, he says, if he was

appointed to yeltsin. eh, nemtsov or primakov instead of putin would have been completely different, but in fact this is the hatred of the russian. well, very different ways. development is directly very different, but in fact. that 's it, both one and the other are very different. all russian, she appeared for the first time in the fourteenth year. and, by the way, which is very important now, i will return to this, after all, we can talk about this old man as much as we like, uh, call him there, yes, lenin’s words are useful, but in fact, why was it important to me that vitaltovich was here to be published in such a serious newspaper, you need to go through a series of reduction moments. i have published myself in independent. it is not just the will of a person to express his thoughts. oh, and by the way, in many publications the opinion of the author is written, it may not coincide with

the opinion of the editors of this one. i did not find, by the way, in the newspaper. well, i banned everything, because this is an absurd statement. i don't have a car. can never coincide with the opinion of the editors, especially since i do not have the editors. this means that this coordination is going on at the level of the editor-in-chief. the starting number is a must. i know how to rule, this or that text, some thoughts are invested, probably even a political order will be made to this person. and this is what confuses me the most. not the author of this man's e. and what he expresses. but no, what he expresses often he expresses the opinion of a certain class, the opinion of a certain class , and this is in conditions when it is against my country. a large-scale total war is launched. it deeply offends me, as a citizen, and i think that there are millions of such people, whom these

expressions are insulting about cultural inferiority and you see the wrong one now i'm just distracted, just everything, so that people can concentrate. you understand that you did not understand, you can imagine for a second the formulation of the cultural inferiority of the jewish people. so that with such a wording an article was published in any newspaper in the world, well, except for iran, you can imagine how to formulate, because the jewish people have, an amazing property right away, any encirclement to the nation is immediately suppressed. this wave immediately rises, but in russia sorry in the nineties on tv in guelman's performances were shown when a pig with the inscription russia was slaughtered live. you do not remember such plots, so this is constantly humiliation of picking and mockery of one's own history. it is simply impossible, and not to be in the ethnic sense of budget money,

but in the social destruction of russianness in the socio-cultural sense and what did he let slip. he said that putin was very close to me. well, until 2011, well, somewhere until 2014. why because it was opened by liberals, let's go like that further, but after the fourteenth, his social base changed, that is, he became for putin. uh, a completely different social category began to support him. yes, putin has become closer to the people. remember, as they said on one of the broadcasts, that as soon as the emperor. uh, the russian begins to grow a beard, he becomes invincible, because in a beard it is a connection with the people. now putin has such a beard, because he is supported by the majority of the population and tenaciously, and peter was not invincible. well, nikolaev was and helped for appeared on time. yes, in the 19th century it was scary. yes , under peter it was not yet so, that is, the

social base that the president now has. it scares a certain part of the people, they pour it into their here in this one. what he said is not true. he honestly signed in hatred in contempt for the russian people. put what he said to me so from his point of view simply, because it was understandable, that is, we do not like that someone it says about us. we believe that we need to get an article. now now we need to be petted wool. no, i want to say why i remembered the motto of the independents, this is an angry article, of course, this article was like that, yes, and er, this is an article. uh, an indicator of disrespect for one's own people and for the country, the residence of this people for the government that created this country. sorry , peter's three hundred and fiftieth birthday was celebrated in different ways, well, many states, in general, were not on the continent at that

time. we already had an empire and we already had such an emperor

so that every entrepreneur could just do the government introduced a moratorium on scheduled and unscheduled inspections of businesses throughout russia in case of its violation. leave a complaint on

the portal of public services and get a response within 24 hours. we can show the world a lot of cultural historical moments to sign, well, obviously emchugov, and then the whole list of liberals from koch to

chubais. yes, because it was the mainstream that russians said to nature. the whole history of russia is vicious. and it is necessary to abandon this as soon as possible. russia must be divided into several small european states, in order to rule the russian, one must apologize for a long time to learn to be treated for their imperialism. and then, therefore, to see, but what did you say to us, that the poles say that the americans say, that is, this, which is very important, this whole mainstream destroyed the soviet union from the eighties and destroyed russia in the nineties, and this whole stream is still has its mishandled agents in the structures of higher educational institutions, where they directly own these, but is it not so until now. how many are there in different structures of the government, so, what are we talking about, that is, this, but he was put up? like a useful

fool? yes, so that he, uh, demonstrated strength, why did i say that you can not win? uh, russophobia is outside, until you deal with it, there must be some things inside. here, uh, moral condemnation, p-, uh, some informational things. oh well, it’s just that the state should have some kind of its own representation of aspects, that is, its conditions for wartime things are unacceptable. yes, we will prove ourselves before the crimean war, if you remember in russian newspapers published in laudatory articles about the french and british troops. this is a congratulatory telegram after the russians just before. you need to do something , you know, because this is a phenomenon. it is not new against russia against orthodoxy a thousand-year history. yes , it is. how is it passed on from generation to generation when we say that the russian empire was rightly taken over by the byzantine empire, which the russian empire claimed, but really corresponds

not because the writing was created here by byzantium, orthodoxy of byzantium well, this is because in general russia as an empire as a kingdom was then declared after the wedding of ivan the terrible to the kingdom, when it turned into a principality into a kingdom and this is a synonym for empire. yes? we remember that he the terrible behaved like a pedigree from someone along the line. grandmother sophia pavlova what is typical? yes, and then an ideology appeared that the russian empire should expand, it should be taken, how to inherit from the byzantine empire to go to the straits of constantinople and so on and so on, yes, and in general, not without reason after the baptism of ivan the terrible all the major patriarchates of the orthodox church, constantinople you have a boob the orthodox church, being under the ottomans, they congratulated him and said, we hope that finally there is a new emperor, which means yes, then then and then everyone thought that

they are the way we are here, the byzantine empire finally existed for thousands of years, which collapsed and glory to you, lord, after all, the strangest thing. you know that the empire called byzantine did not exist. this western historians came up with called it byzantine why but, because the claim was on the great prince of the roman empire, she was an empire, although the santyans, there, to be honest, were very bad. there are other relationships. yes, but it was perceived negatively. they believed that this could not be, then ours. unfortunately, historians have picked up this name. yes, and the fight has been going on ever since. well understand, they can't let you into vast territories. even now, after the collapse of the ussr, there are some resources that are huge in minerals. yes, we have zymography problems, yes. it all existed. here now see veles sanctions, it would seem that everything will be strangled. well, there are no natural resources. yes, in order to develop their industry. yes, but we have them , and we somehow still can withstand, so the task was always to destroy. this is the first time. i gave him the seat of the russian empire, it is obvious that

this was done, not only by forces within the state, like these between people, as if we are now condemning the chick, the same people were in the russian empire. this elite was the so-called sarik who appointed all the relatives. yes on their relatives. yes, but many would be connected there abroad, so to speak, and it’s no secret to anyone that the nikolaev time was then. so, yes, and when and when they realized that i would stand up cska cpsu, the time has come that you can blame everything on the king to remove him and come to power yourself. and somehow they did it in a different way, but there was a terrible thing in the february and then terrible october civil war, tens of millions of murderous blood guards. all this has been revived, what does the soviet union mean since the time of stalin. sorry of this, the born russian empire is only more powerful more powerful and so on under the thin shell of communism. s. excuse me for being frank, the imperial ideology has always been hidden and everything that is good in the soviet union is waiting for it, you can even arrest the first

secretary, like some kind, that is, the state. it's okay to hit it doesn't work that way. yes, that is, everything to do with this, it was a huge empire, and now they managed to destroy it , too, inside the elite, there were a lot of people , when we say boris nikolaevich traveled. where did you listen, the first secretary of the moscow member pour a pen. who took it? it will all be, yes, everything was done from the inside, and the elite played a negative role. yes, and i'm not the people, no one asked, no one was interested. so we decided, so we did it, and we are now reaping the benefits. this is a civil war, what is now going on after the collapse of the ussr, all the wars on the territory, it means that the soviet union is a civil war, a civil war, when the former citizens kill each other. in the name of what under, of course, he says, oh my, they didn’t expect this and we need to kill them now. they need to be destroyed so that they do not revive again, god forbid, but

what needs to be done for this, the basis is to try the elite, it means this one, it means to use it. you say published remchukov. chief editor. he is like that, he remains on. yes, he says, newspapers, regardless of what is completely, completely independent, we have such and so on. few published, well offended the russian people. yes , think, nothing terrible, but the whole problem. you you are right, these urges are very perceived. many universities, let's not hide it. yes, part of the intelligentsia, so to speak, yes, part of them, including getting used to it, what did you start, what is it called? lgbt plus? yeah well, it's called lgbt abvgd in another way. i will not use my own words. it's called a little differently. yes, and this is also being implemented you say? there's nothing wrong with us there. well, what is there, there? alcove fry? no, with this in the west, too, it began from the beginning. yes, no, no, we won’t condemn, and then now they are introducing teaching in schools school. if you want, you don't want to - piss on your children, teach that it turns out to be normal . boy, boy, girl is better. and if you do n’t take your children to school, several states , according to the law, can bring you to a criminal case, that is, it is

forcibly introduced and this cannot be underestimated. when we say, yes, it's okay, here, it's okay. no, it's very scary. and it is necessary to suppress the germs of all this, to suppress the germs of the appearance of such articles. these people should be mean to wrangle to criminal responsibility. what responsibility should be considered? what answer is the responsibility of the time it is not the thirty-seventh year no, the thirty-seventh year after the birth was the revolution. we don't need another revolution. we saw it. today i even today, even colonel general and kartopolov, asked a question in the morning. it turns out that if a citizen of the russian federation is fighting against the russian federation, let's say the ukrainian army, then yes. this can serve as a basis to consider something treason and with 12 years in prison. i say that you are mocking, that is, a person is fighting against his countries from 12 years 20 minimum. and better life we ​​have no higher measure. that is, if this is not treason, if it is not transmitted, then a for

cooperation with foreign special services from eight years, that is, efremov, drunk, kills a person, gets 8.5 years. and you sold the country. there you entered into direct contact with a foreign intelligence service , and for eight years nothing like that happened at all, which means that this is an underestimation. this includes such publications. now let's keep silent and discuss, no action will be taken. tomorrow is another trip, then the day after tomorrow and no one in this studio has a question. or maybe it’s not just someone who decided to express their thoughts, but maybe it’s a deliberate presentation of thoughts that are encouraged from the outside in order to create explosive material here because the hope is that sooner or later the economic situation will be difficult, yes, remember? let's kick the criticism. it can be said that if an insult to the titular russian people is not any kind of criticism. this is a specific criticism.

it is an insult. in fact, calling for the collapse russian state. enough twice. we survived it. nobody else wants. understandable criticism. we will now ban criticism of saltykov-shchedrin, because if he considers it that way, then he insulted the russian people terribly. you know, i have not lived, i say, we have saltykov-shchedrin. i am aware. i didn't live like that. lucky for him, he was lucky, but i didn't put him in prison by people who understood that the russian state was not subject to insult. and what do you say in israel now, too, can be different. say that the arab people it's bad. well let's be realistically, where the critic ends and the felony begins. i will tell you where, where it is called for the collapse of the state. this criterion is understandable, you understand? and this article falls under this can't be planted. well, how? and how do you prove , let's take a tough version with us, that this article

calls for the collapse of the state? alexander sergeevich subko calls sincerely thinks so is another matter, that i do not agree with him, that he calls for the improvement of the russian people of russia, who will kill each other. as it is now? we are now killing each other, as was the case after the so-called october revolution, which is not very scary when we go in this direction of a complete ban on criticism. i do not speak after the soviet is also very critical. yes, criticism, maybe we are simply against the authorities to properly strengthen the state. this is normal constructive criticism. well, when a person says, it is necessary to ruin it, it is a state thing that decides who decides how. are we blind deaf deaf stupid we can't read this article that whether? that's the point how independent newspapers are attentive, but nevertheless, this is not a substitute for the court. this is, well, like, and others read and read and say, everything is fine. this is a very dangerous topic,

very dangerous. you know me here recently. i've dared to ask a number of questions during a special military operation. and there they began to get angry that it was solovyov who allowed you to ask questions. if you offered to improve a certain mechanism that you were interested in. for example, you spoke. yes, you saw how westerners began to quote bagdasarov, kedna, step nazarovo and all at once here local patriots shout. but let's see what they allow themselves to say. listen if it contributes to the improvement of the mechanism. this is a person to call openly and then the regional court will decide. yes, sorry, i survived the collapse of the great state. i saw blood. i saw how under the guise of democracy freedom of speech, scum. in the 1990s, you remembered vitaliyevich, and do you

remember that this man did not understand, he was still young , what was published there? what flew away means that this is democracy, stalinism, the return of socialism, that he wants to tell you one case. well, you can’t wait either, because in the end you can clean everything up and this will lead to the fact that later there will be an answer to the officials. this is the big problem. after all, how many bureaucrats work for any criticism. you frame will say, oh, he is against the state oh, tell me right, let me, let's go to hell. if you didn't call, he is a state in liquidations. can you say anything? well , if you call for it, if you say that it doesn't match. well then, any harsh criticism, any meanness you say, well, i don't want the state to fall apart and, like , scribble, wait. well, what did they write, what did they say? chubais well, pavel, i gave everything i could to privatization, because the main task

was not to raise money, but to hammer the last nail in the nickname of the coffin of communism. this is the collapse of the state, and he believes that this is how the creation of a new one, in our eyes, a terrible thing happened. state property, accumulated for decades, was handed out scammers. this time, and i'm talking about the fact that the tragedy is that there is always a court on the pages and the court, on the basis of laws, can only determine what is a crime, what is not good, because it started differently. now, of course, they can. we now have crowds going around, then they confirmed the legal understanding, they will go around demanding to be hung there shoot the auctions. they were done at the suggestion of the higher people standing on the chubas, he was already in the court time camp. we have the most independent court in the world. as you remember, the hero of the famous film, he confirmed that our most attentive authorities will simply be at a time when such power existed,

so this is a very difficult moment. i understand your pathos, i share it. i share the more important public moral judgment is public judgment. well, the great vernadsky was morally condemned for a lot, you know, condemnation and representation is always very difficult, because the russian people have a delicate spiritual structure. why in the first world war the russian army, having absolutely success in the caucasus, it seems, on the western front, the enemy did not stand at the walls of petrograd, it was not moscow that fell apart from the inside. that's liberalism. it led to dire consequences. and why were the germans under leningrad during the second world war? here, near moscow, this did not happen, but because here is the iron power in the iron understanding of statehood and i'm sorry, i had no public judgments for such an article. they slapped you right. that's all

the drug addict. now you have put a few fundamentally important questions that we bring out every time, our big problem is that we did not give an assessment. we did not give an assessment and did not reveal the true reasons for the seventeenth year. from a management position, we did not really assess the stalinist era, we denigrated it, but did not give a real assessment. we did not take into account the experience of the collapse of the soviet union , they gave me an assessment of the nineties. institutes in china, individual institutes are engaged only in the study of perestroika. and why do we have to blame, therefore, it is very important for us to understand that we they didn’t realize they didn’t survive, they didn’t appreciate and didn’t draw conclusions from their own history, so every time it’s often painful to repeat either one or the other mistakes. well, we have smart people. they will probably appreciate it, but the truth is they won’t be in time for advertising.

in the meantime, at the st. petersburg economic forum , a meeting on the automotive industry is also taking place, when vladimir vladimirovich asked. why have prices gone up so much? with what joy prices? so do you think these prices will go down? we have prices, they listen so much when i do, and i really liked it. today, a few statements by mr. miller in my opinion very witty and listen to change the paradigm. and if we remember the classic. uh, scheme money

commodity money stroke. here it is the prestand paradigm. now a completely different formula comes to the fore. money sold goods first gas, then it was extracted. our product our rules we don't play games. the rules that we did not come up with, this is actually a very important wording. we don't play games whose rules we didn't make up only now we have reached this formulation, because , unfortunately, over the past 30 years. we all the time played by the rules that we did not come up with and were surprised when these rules were changed for us. well, let's put one more small fragment from alexei borisovich. and remember the anecdote. yes

, when a man's leg hurts, he comes to the surgeons, the famous academician consults and the first, says it is necessary to amputate a lot as soon as possible, the second says. no, you know you need to speak as quickly as possible. no, i need it urgently console. and the men are a little sorry. he comes to the hurried man and says, listen, look what this psychopath says with his foot and they say, there is a lot to go. no. no, what is not needed. how is it that all the academicians of surgery said that there is nothing new to worry about. she will wither on her own. you don’t understand this, these global international institutions, when the system is being shipped, it also slowly dries up because it dries up, and we no longer feel their rudders, and they themselves no longer understand their own. e from i emphasize the meaning is simply lost, the meaning is lost. i am

i really didn’t understand what the two lovely girls were talking about, looking at the name that the oldest one is nearby it can be seen from this young man, something at this moment dmitry here in this general philosophical discussion, nevertheless, we must not forget, uh, the affairs of our brands. well, yes. in general , i wanted this bass to be preserved, that we often discussed longer, but in fact, as if there were still new ones sitting next to it. here they just had a benefit performance today. i’ll submerge all of us a little over the past 50 for 6 hours, the price of gas has increased by 65% ​​class, why has it increased increased because nord stream alone stopped deliveries by about 60%. as a matter of fact, it supplied 167 million barrels a day. now 67 minus 100,100 million barrels per day - this is 36, and

five, which is logical, and, accordingly, a billion barrels per year, and we have a total throughput capacity of nord stream 2,55 billion. that is, this is a lot, given that , which, accordingly, we still have this fried now, it costs now not for 3 weeks, it costs for 3 months, at least. here, respectively, it is from the market, as if it would still go away, it will approximately go a month for a-a, somewhere around 1.8 billion, but cubic meters. that is, this is a very large volume, respectively, this is the question of what, in principle, there is a possibility. u some things impose why what started now is just proof that the words here are quotes from well europe last year, uh for energy resources in general. it paid somewhere between 350-400 billion euros, but this year thanks to the decisions

that it took on the embargo of oil and petroleum products, regarding the statements that are being made relatively gradually abandoning russian gas due to the increase in prices that occurred for gas by 3 to 4 times for oil, about twice europe will overpay about another 400 billion euros. well , imagine what an additional load. this is actually, in our opinion, not the limit yet, because there will be friends can be much critical and today's photos of two. well, i won't comment. just look at these people. 400 billion plus into the pipe, probably a macron in zelensky's ear whispers what good fellows we are, but in fact, pasta might find out this sunday, when they have the second round of elections in the parliamentary elections, i remind you when it is actually lost and the coalition of two people. he will most likely have to go to the republicans, who will score about 80-60 according to

operational data. it will be funny that the party that loses the choice after the fact, he will have ah. she will lower will decline, she will decide for the first time in history, france is so interesting. that's all to what to what, in fact, what the whole thing began with the fact that europeans did not impose sanctions on gazprom, respectively, by the way, as on nord stream alone and on everything else, which is why the situation, because from the fact that there is only one unit, there are about eight, like siemens yes, they repaired it in montreal canada canadian sanctions canada seems to be the most severe sanctions in this production chain and because of this now the price of gas or europe such as in winter. for 3 days for 2 days is actually 2 1/2 days. here, 14, 14, respectively, a-a june increased by 65%. here she is so fast at all, in principle, not will never break up, if it is recalculated, it is in the inflationary component. this is just an acceleration of inflation, that is, for germany, for example, which

mainly receives cheap gas, the same nord stream alone goes to germany first of all. how many times does she go to germany for her. this will be a very serious blow. here, there are various calculations . on this account, including employment. but this is a loss of about 60% of cheap gas that goes directly. this is the cheapest one. why gas goes to europe through nord stream alone there cheap pumping cost. this is a very serious blow, so it seems to be the time to sort of agree on something, and all because europe has become a hostage of canadian sanctions , in fact, a strong dry from the russian market. here, god, punished such a question. this is about the fact that this is a statement that you know that we have energy resources under sanctions that have been withdrawn from you by one point by one production process. here is one there. one plant is located. in which only can be repaired matched aggregates, because of this, these volumes are already decreasing, moreover, if they can be dreamed of, generally to zero. this will be a very serious blow. that is, as if now there is not even an opportunity to deliver this gas from nowhere additionally even terminal capabilities, there are no such two-something filled. but this is the only

way, by the way, guys, the equipment is all new there, so their situation is not paradoxical. now it is very difficult from this point of view formally. there is even technical gas there, that is, in principle, it can be launched some speed. but the problem is that now it is precisely because of this sanctions impact. here is the price of this issue can be calculated. okay, respectively, this is 400 billion. so i want to note that, firstly, this, so to speak, will lead to additional costs only due to the additional costs that the economies of the european court are now spending to support their own, and counter-inflationary struggle, only one and waist will spend more than ten billion moment. she will spend, france will spend more than 10 billion. there they co- it was my property being taken away by an italian. i understand that he is sitting. incidentally , italy is also now actively no zamora, gas is the most interesting even expensive rad rad you will know, this, by the way, to the question of there in the communities and everything else is a question of

integrity. if biden was so principled, then he is going to saudi arabia in july. i remind you that somewhere we are a democratic country in the world of business. okay god to everyone that he promised to make this some of the toughest moments requirements, as it were, according to the lgbt i will buy plus in general in the world, in principle, and he goes there. it doesn't seem to break him at all. or, for example, suppose the situation is now in the usa, which is happening, i remind you that in the usa in 2010, the requirements for all diesel engines are that there must have been a def df, as it were, respectively, this is a separate such hmm tank that is connected to this facility, respectively , he added an exhaust system so that exhausts, damn it, are so difficult for the environment, respectively, this requirement. it is now a mandatory requirement in most countries of the world. well, in the big countries there like, italy is a rope. uh, india canada, many others brazil, soon there will be a driver in france in germany, so, the main part, as it were, the main part, right 38% is urea - this is, respectively. uh part of the production. from the gas they are limited

to the gas supply of the russian federation as a result. they will soon just have a diesel, because without this thing it cannot be started, that is, in fact , it can go about 5 km / h. plus or minus. here, and then, accordingly, it can be cut off, but the fines for this are colossal and this is up to the main components of the green agenda, by the way, because it allows you to seriously reduce diesel emissions. so this is all what is the point of principle? that is, if for the sake of principles you take accordingly and increase the production of energy carriers, which simply reduce a serious increase, as it were, and, accordingly, gas emission plus diesel fuel in fact. put it like this in a old format removes from it as depressants. and in this way you overstep your principles, you are ready to start over your principles, which for some reason are held by you in individual countries. but issues like your lgbt agenda or your green agendas or your human rights agendas that you promised never to cross, for that you are ready to

cross. you are ready to date a person who promises to date something. you are ready, respectively, to produce more, and to cause more damage to nature in your mind, respectively, although promised, but during their election dig. what to do? you never will, and you are even starting to open gas pipelines that you promised you would never open at the time of the tramp. and this is the most interesting of your principles. it is limited to some territories the economy will break you, because five-five dollars a gallon is an argument for an election campaign, respectively, and human rights or a green energy issue. this is not an argument, apparently . and this is a very big tragedy. she is is that the most dangerous, when you have out of the entire segment. here is something that works according to the rules. everything else is included. this exception is on or the corruption component, which in fact is a very dangerous part of this to the question of the first about the first. uh, lines of discussion. i can give the example of many heads of the constituent entities of the russian federation who actually said that they have problems with roads, with the economy, with everything else, that this is external influence, external influence. despite all that, a person is simply

built it wrong. or, for example, now i passed the wrong one or the wrong about the detachments spent it flowed. well, that is, as if the autumn season had passed, and the person would actually sit and tell that this was an external influence. and there, that china will drag in and there are such stories . i will not personal make problems. in that. you are. we must understand the boundary. we should not go to different radical components. first. just how to give, but as if on a boat, and the regulators are all, in principle, how we ended, in principle, we see, but on the other hand, we really need to keep some kind of our own vision. here it is more visible, the strongest is. it's always interesting how it all starts. now everyone will see the producers of good things they want and most importantly, but it is best to check.

if you break it with this vision, if this refrigerator, roughly speaking, is your refrigerator, how

do you understand breaking the agenda? here it will be yours, as it were, your victory, you will not fight with articles. you will fight the reality that five dollars a gallon surrounds people. they are see every day. they may not read the article, but they will see it at every gas station. here, i look at these three musketeers who came to kiev, uh, a miserable leader who brought his country to almost almost complete ruin, what what what successes? these three have a macron in their countries, what has he achieved in france, that he is going somewhere to teach someone? only because of the wretchedness of the political elite of france that they could agree, he remained president. it's liverwurst

, what he's doing to germany what he's done in germany, whom is he going to teach? is your italian friend italiano? well, what enters the pantheon is better at the first sheet of italy, uh, a good caricature, he enters supermario, a super financier, he’s just what they are, this is a four, here they are all of the same level, they sank to the level of this clown and there is no they are the difference. the unfortunate ones that each of them in their own country did not achieve anything worthwhile came to him to teach him how to govern the state. history laughs disaster what you said, if you know me

met him in the nineties in the early to late eighties. it is said for a long service. it was interesting for me to see what a person who works in the ideological apparatus is, who i wanted to understand lies to understand, it doesn’t matter through what i understand her? yes, they recruited to speak directly. no no no. here i was recruiting. why not ? because to understand what is happening in the country to recruit. and it was an interesting conversation. basically, we talked philosophy. there was an intelligent man , nothing of what i now see, he said. he did not say, i was interested in a strange thing. no , no, uh, such an apparatchik, i wonder, i knew

some and maybe others. okay, so what happened to him must be considered. he was not like he is today. this is a speaker. this is evolution - this is development. that is, those people who later did perestroika and smashed your country with a rake, they were not like that. this is their development, that is, you need to understand when you evaluate the states of people. and what will be the dynamics? what they will turn into were such signs or were not unimportant, well, blame his that he was then pretending to be. no , he wasn't like that. well, he told me how he worked in poland. how did he argue with his polish comrades, how did he teach marxism? and i believe in

it in such a way that not everything is so simple and very often in politics in the state they do not take into account the dynamics, they did not teach physics. they only taught, by the way, but politics is the dynamics of a completely unexpected dynamo kiev must be taken into account and try to understand in relation to what he is saying today. that is, the russian people are not worthy to govern the state, and the german worthy. what did the german people bring the whole world to when he ruled, when they were given into the hands of the state. it was bismarck who trained the reichstag and became the german empire, for which the german people brought both germany and the whole world in the twentieth century, and you can let's govern the state. can a pole be allowed

to run the state? technique he refers to these here, this, to which they came and can be given to rule the state. can the american people see what's going on there? who can and cannot be given control state? russia is at the very end? there is still half the world ahead, and who gives permission to govern the state of the wording, and this can or cannot govern the state, but the people never ask. it just manages to succeed will you succeed not to be many peoples. there is not. they have many states in relation to russia, what i can say is that russia is

a unique state, it is generally the antithesis of any european state, europe is one. no minerals, so she needed colony, so it got on its economic feet at the expense of the colony. and in russia there is no need for a colony, she herself is richer than all of europe put together. and according to european concepts, russia should have been columns. previously, she has minerals, it must be a colony of europe, they are obtained, and you are in this different, that russia is so rich. it can be an independent state more successful than any european state, than all they place to take. but about this forum, which you said, they showed here. i don't know, maybe i'm wrong. maybe my requirements are too high. here he says.

nuts that the economy of the soviet union was inefficient it was inefficient because it was closed. it was inefficient because it wasn't competitive, it was inefficient because it was over-centralized of it all. no, of course, and in russia will not. and when the russian economy was open competitive. when it was not centralized, where did it come down to? already this does not notice. all this discussion went on, as it were, under the slogan, god forbid, to return to the ussr, which is the current problem of the russian economy, and someone is being scared there. yourself no not yourself. you and

power do not exist, and you and power. to do this, they say not to return to the soviet union, they scare them with the soviet union, not realizing that it was you rightly said. they are the soviet union, it was different. man, the twenties were the thirties. it was a war, it was the fifties. you can't smear everything in one. why so surface on the mountain to talk about the gravest problems these people speak so agully and unprofessional and superficially have no right to talk about the country's economy. this is not a theoretical debate. it is considered historically, as you can say so. here's the thing said. i don't understand the heartless initiative in russia there will be no technological development when russia has achieved

the highest technological and scientific development involved in the initiative. until now, some broadcasts of your military industry. reaping the fruits of the soviet military industry, everything that now flies. except church everything, these are improvements russian soviet military industry, which were abandoned, which were stopped, which were almost buried by the heartless initiative. yes, how can a person one of the central of your economy say such things? this is serious. dishonest initiatives are moving here. why were there economic successes in the soviet union ? because she was in the state. she

was social, she was for justice in order to develop science, culture and the people and not for private initiatives to build yachts. palaces and carried money abroad. there was no objectivity of the soviet economy of the stalin period, subject to the existence of artels of private initiative, when , for example, technological development, for example, the same more than 20 percent, yes, and why did each system have, that is, decay began all the time of khrushchev when he destroyed private

initiative, he destroyed the artillery. there went the things of the state were not artels, the basis of the state was the dictatorship of the proletariat. no, i'm talking about the economy from the nep to industrialization. target the soviet economy was to build an economy for the state and the people, as the base of the state and for the people. and not in order to enrich someone, this was not the goal, there is never such a goal in different ways, this is a long time unequivocally. but when created, excuse the whole caste above pictures of workers who lived quite like an aristocracy. matchmaker, 5

years old average in russia, she has a dress in which you have to work for 10 years in order to get a suit from him, which is the head of salary, i want to remind you that the same thing happened in soviet times and from the time of lenin they handed out envelopes in which there were several salaries of a simple worker and there were two hundred sections of the gum in which they gave out things that the workers could not get, never under any circumstances and received apartments received state dachas received cars in the absence of everything and even boats were not it was the economy. well no, that was the purpose of the economy in each system its pros and cons. if you the soviet economy was perfect, it would be and who said that it was her, so when we clean up often. we get reverse kink when jeans start to win, common sense. and here it is necessary to clearly

understand here that the loss of one of the components leads, unfortunately, to unification. and this is a very dangerous topic. who determines what people need, and when the state determines, then i have a shortage, speculators begin to look , it’s unknown where our states know, relatively speaking, three pairs of pants for a year, and you don’t know what competition was scientific historical institutions. it was very strong competition as well. by the way you while she was mad. this is this is just such a primitive approach to the economy of the state, the main directions of the economy are determined by the state. the main ones. and what am i talking about? i'm not talking about shawls, but people live on sandals of the state; they don't live on sandals; the state lives on industry. and when the state does not live on the sandals of the people of the state. you get the soviet union in the late eighties.

rising at the level of the unknown brought jeans or an ostrich took out a batch file took out a band-aid brought a video recorder, the current corruption of government officials. it is thousands of times greater than it was under soviet rule. yes listen to life, because other current corruption of state officials is orders of magnitude lower than it was in the nineties, an order of magnitude lower , because in the nineties because there was even your pursuit of jeans in the nineties and destroyed the state on the eighties foundations of the economy. they are industrialists. this means that you fought the heart of the people, creating an economy, if the people find themselves in such a state when they are ready to give up your state, then to whom to make these demands on yourself, or maybe the authorities that prepared this. i tell her power. well, that is power, so i will say this, if they manage to read, for what money did they buy themselves a watch. i don’t give a damn what watches they don’t have, for example, i didn’t care. what car

he drove, the king does not give a damn that lenin drove a rolls-royce. well, he rode a rolls-royce, tsarsky well, he did the right thing, sorry vasily ivan chapaev rode, what on a rolls-royce, they deserved it normally on a horse horses, if not a question there must be poverty, and the question is that there must be fair accountable incomes that people can explain this, but equality in poverty leads to the fact that people say no, full runs those, i just did not hear. so far, there is something to talk about the economy for the state. it was also a separate section, where hearing problems spoke. no, i just didn’t look, there were separate people and galushka talked about the economy for the state and it was very convincing there too. that is, there are many different panels many different discussions. and it was too. i just panels a lot of different judgments. okay. i said

no, of course, we need the synergy of our previous experience. all the best is taken from there and not distributed. i don’t know, you suggested that you shouldn’t look at 70 years of soviet power. here. what period of soviet power do you like? well, from the point of view of the pipeline of the structure, an excellent period is rushing. however, we were the most basic pipeline. yes, there are advantages. i tell you like the economy i don't measure like or dislike yes s another criterion of efficiency, what period of the economy? each in his own way, when he solved the problems that faced the state , the best period of the economy that he saved, this state is the thirties quite right, but this period is a combination of state- planned and private insiders. he said, i do not say

400.000. only americans. i didn’t say, as i said, the goal of the economy is formulated correctly by the authorities, and the authorities are formed by who, therefore, here we find ourselves in such a vicious circle, because the authorities should not only hear the people, but also see into the distance and understand that it is possible to do the same. only when you see this image of the future. this is possible only if you have an ideology, you are striving for something. what society? why is the people's state formed power, and not vice versa in real? in life, of course, on the contrary, well, i see then. state who will form formed, and that the people formed the government? lenin, the power forms the people of the state or vice versa? with what joy when your people formed lenin and his government was 20.000? the bolshevik people

did not know anything about them at all, so what did they say. i said that the people form the power. i said the power to form three times. i said. you just speak differently. i say i can't hear well. and one more thing about a friend will not have time to say. yes, it turns out the story is everything, this is what it is. it has already been in the history of this garden, it is absolutely a sin. and they only destroy their states when power is chosen on a gender basis, scientists , enterprise managers, workers - this is the state is doomed alexander well i can only become aufiderzein, because she no longer has time . no, my best time, by the way, was, if we take the soviet union. it was the end of the eighties , you will laugh. i quit a big government position that

i really quit and set up an honest medical center and felt pretty good. yes, yes, yes and it was very good for me, so i can say that it suited me quite well. although there were a lot of attacks on me, but now i'm completely about other i am tenacious to the philosopher. but when i listened to him, uh, i read his quote. here, i 'll read you another quote. she's a little hmm from another time, but she's remarkably similar. i will translate it from german. uh, national socialism was not based on russian pre -russian prejudices. we just wanted to create our own racial and national, our own racial national unity. i never spoke. e that the jews are people of the low as the lower class. i never said it was a different race. i am he simply admitted that the mixing of different cultures does not lead to a good result, and we will only

lose our roman and greek culture on this . there are a lot of interesting things, and this whole conversation and this quote, but chick, which i read. she me. for some reason, she suddenly returned the forty-sixth year to the curby trial. you know that when hmm well the process went to them was wrong. they were sent to them. eh, to several psychologists were sent to the defendants. one of these psychologists, then, later published an excellent book, i recommend reading the title later, i will name it, e he says that the first thing he did, of course, went to everyone in his cell and had conversations with them from everyone with whom he talked. uh, except for julius penaler juliustracher. it was the editor-in-chief of the newspaper der sturner, the main propaganda newspaper in germany, besides julia with the

stracher coat, there was also a guileiter of some territory . yes, absolutely additionally. yes he uh he has had a very low iq and everyone else was much above average. that is, these are all people whom he assessed as people with a very high intellectual and educational potential. and it's very interesting how these people behaved, how they talked and justified and talked about their superiority over others, because what we have became a lull for me. this is the most terrible thing about this, that this is an attempt to present, uh, one race or one nationality below or worse than another taras theory. it's nothing else here no philosophy. this is purely racial theory. here is yulia stracher. he said, here you accuse me. e that i preached the russian theory that i was against the jews, nothing of the sort. i told the children, explained that jesus christ explained to all of us that the jews are the children of satan, this

is satan, and until we destroy them. we won't be able to live. okay? in the past, i told them what really is reality, for which you are going to punish me, they hanged him too, and hans frank is the governor general. poland is the one who just led this star, he generally spoke of david. by the way, he accepted catholicism while in nuremberg and he spoke. well, in general, i'm now coming to an understanding of what is certain through god. in many ways wrong, but in what we were wrong, after all, we were fulfilling our mission. we just wanted to show that we are good. e that we are not just good. and that we provide this good for everyone else and we wanted to clear everything else from this filth, we are normal people, and keitel said, uh he was talking about to me, it has nothing to do with it at all. i just fought, i spent 44 years fighting the enemies of the fatherland. and now you are going to award me,

uh, those in righteousness for whom the possessed furs were responsible , he said so, the possessed furs, and so it was all of them there who were executed, who were given 20 years, one hess there, served until 87 years. and this is the whole story, when i read all this. i ask myself a question. what happened like this, i was 90 in 2005. i met in a berlin cafe with one then a young girl, who at the first meeting was german, who told me about her suitcase in this way. well, not a suitcase, such a redicure and got me some old glasses there. she says, look at these glasses. these are himmler glasses. and this is the great-niece of himmler. i know her well and still know her well. she once wrote a very interesting book. i asked katherine we are with her on you, i say katherine why did you bring me this? what do you want me? there's an interesting story there. i already told. she had her husband israel and she gave birth to

him, then a child, but this is a separate story, but the story with glasses. she shocked me even more, because she says, well, i tried to understand all the time, here, there were three himmlers, three himmler brothers, one heinrich one and her grandfather the other, who, as it were, was not involved in these crimes. she says, these are my grandfather's glasses. for me, this is the memory of my family, but i was not. well, yes, he was, of course, a member of his d. yes, well, of course, he knew what he was doing, brother. he knew, that the brother was responsible for the final solution of the jewish question. well, as it were, well, this memory , it remains. i can’t just take these glasses and throw them in the oven and burn them so that nothing happens. we still have chairs and himmler families at home. we have books left. we have photos. they keep that memory. they kept this memory in relation. i won’t say a word to katherine, an absolutely decent normal woman, but with an absolutely normal outlook on life, who understands everything perfectly, but the question is, i think you asked last night at the party. why didn't

the nuremberg trials go through to the end?

different eras, different rulers, one great power wanted to deceive fate with you, you can’t deceive these places, they have a religious feeling, my heart is free.

love story we look at the history of russia in the application or on the website for free.

after all, those who were even convicted and who were not executed ended it with nothing, they were free after 10 years. they wrote books. they talked about national socialism. they explained why it’s good when one nation becomes better than another, and

what we are now reaping, including chick and what, including what we see now in ukraine, are the results of not being completed, not finishing the nuremberg trials. well, they probably all know. e. well, everyone knows that many azov people have. here they found these nazis with swastikas of the sun. here are the symbols. yes, yes, do you know what it is in 2019, the nazis of azov, first of all, together with their brothers of the publication, organized the order of the centuria, the order of the centura is a national a socialist group, which is a symbol, which is precisely this sun, therefore, many of them see tattoos about them, it exists. but in europe, no one cares about it at all, maybe even no one knows except. i read it. eh, there is such a site, i recommend his voltaire site. there are a lot of interesting philosophical things. it 's just the whole story here. uh, well, in

german it is recommended in french for those who do not know and uh, this is it exists, and this, too, is not the end of this nuremberg trial. that is, we say, well, russians, probably they are somehow they are crazy. well, they were always not like that, so you need to crush them. it is necessary to destroy them ukraine in everything. it has been developing all these years, no one has done anything to ensure that i mean europe not only russia in order to destroy it in order to say that this is the russian theory. well, now finishing the last sentence. e so that we do not return to the nurweg process, but in order to bring to the end what is happening now in ukraine, there is only one person, only one person. the emotion that allows these problems to be solved is the emotion of fear. only this emotion makes a person make those decisions that he could not have been rich in emotions, such as joy, they are completely different, therefore, it is possible to defeat what is happening early in

ukraine only with the help of fear. i'm not about to intimidate the population. well, you know, here's my last question. that's who today in germany, when they talk about russia's special military operation in ukraine, they quote and whom they are most afraid of, well, with the exception of vladimir vladimirovich putin and now dmitry anatolyevich medvedev, whom they also suddenly began to be afraid of. they are peskov e medina no ramzan kadyrov ramzan kadyrov they are afraid, because they understand that this man said, i will find and destroy and find and destroy, and then they begin to be afraid, and then they understand. that's what we have to reckon with, and those are all. which say let's have a meeting. let's have some conversations, this is all pinos, as the germans say, this will lead to nothing, therefore, from understanding these here is another hebrew word. i understood why you smiled, and

understanding, now i understand why we are reaping all this and therefore, saying, he is the nuremberg trials. now we need to finish it and finish it on fear for those nazis who should understand they will get it. well, as ramzan akhmatovich says , shaitanov is destroyed, where shaitanization will occur, ukraine was shown a german television report in which these grandchildren of goebbels slandered our country by showing. artillery shelling of donetsk and they said that this makes the russian troops visible, they looked at us or paid attention to the rt request and they officially apologized. but the truth is they were not enough to make an honest report, but at least they publicly admitted that they lied alexander, do i understand correctly? yes, it’s in the middle, where they write from the word dorta they don’t write. there accidentally crept in, mistake where we are

they said he was an attack about a russian, and an attack is such a mistake that when we accepted this text. we didn't pay attention to it, but it makes us very angry, and we are very sorry that this happened and does not correspond to our journalistic uh rule of conduct. and uh, can you imagine? you can't honestly walk. sorry no. give to donbass and make an honest report. otherwise, you are just lying granddaughters. goebels, better let kadyrov come to them, it will be a little later. forgive me if i'm on advertising, then today we are strongly that we have not decided that alexander sergeevich sabko should be put in jail for this article . i will tell you that it is not in our competence to impose any criminal decision, of course. although they share his opinion against it. although i am by no means voltaire yes, that is, the phrase,

but i believe that only the court should rule. but what is. there are a lot of questions here, i absolutely agree with the seminarkevich questions, and there are a lot of advertising now, after we will continue in the new composition. yes, now, of course, is the time for amazing stories. well, first of all, i like how european snobbery

appears in everything. but how many, for example, today there were leaders of states in kiev, only 4 for some reason held them from the side. it didn’t really bother anyone , and then in april, that means grown-up guys, and they don’t like security in the cars, so that no one knows where they will go to the cars with three leaders. yes, you are still on the same track . are you sick? and then they landed at one station in poland, while others changed there several times. are you polyakov? be afraid because if we wanted to solve this issue, but there there is no problem, by the way, they bombed almost everywhere everywhere was okay. at the first moment , the first thing zelensky did was to hand over his

coordinates so that, god forbid, he would not be covered. we know at any moment where zelensky is then at any moment, which means that they decided to come in a different way, listen, of course, but you think that this is not the case. and when they start arranging a macron, don't just go, or rather think about it. yes , the macron went and they carried such provisions behind him. that is, well, what did dima read? this reminiscent of an experienced wife just an experienced wife. it just immediately reminds me of the three musketeers. yes, when they went to the fortress there, they took ford with them to have a feast, or the offended liver sausages, he took bars with him. they are silent about the italian, but i will not believe that he went without his cook without pasta. that is, the dredge must have come to arrange something. why were they taken away, they stood and waved their heads, and if you don’t want to go to sirius, don’t, but these triumniks don’t want, for example, to go to libya

which they destroyed. well, let me show you how it is. after that, they do n’t want to clatter their tongues there. i'm not talking about the donbass, the macron doesn't want to raise it. uh, your little body is not yes, as it was called nedonapoleon. no no, not all the way. i have the same characteristic. he gave, therefore, with this and for him to look. here i traveled around the donbass in donetsk, that french artillery had done it to his frenchman. just in the same place, the french artery, as if they were shelling at civilians. no, why come to these places? these are our ren we have here ren a 8 years before the donbass could not reach. and now it will click the tongue. all three of them want to go together , while still in odessa, the house of trade unions to see how the russians burned there. no, it's not interesting. well, of course, it's different. it's okay. that is. the same can be done, of course, during the time of phenomenal stories. in general, i understood ukraine is actually a country with such, but i

would say a mythologized consciousness. that is, they believe in something of their own, they come up with something. well , let's first show these three bogatyrs. i thought, which image to choose, but it's not in naf-naf. this is not the right image, so let's call it the three heroes at the station. yes, here comes the sholtsy. it's like a suitcase, and excuse me, a man is following him. this is what escorts him so that they do not go anywhere on the chrome, and behind him, as i understand it, louis de funes is not a policewoman, that means three, but then they went to irpenya. here they are watching this experience, they really don’t like it. this is such a workaround. that is, now, if i understand correctly, the main ones are absolutely. uh, the tourist guide of europe is zelensky, that is, he is already so, probably, accustomed to conducts. you know, here we have a stump here

they were raped here they were killed. at the same time, you see, even at home, he could not get dressed. therefore, people in suits and ties come to him, and he is still smelly and unwashable t-shirts. and now someone has already broken kulebe's leg . separate words of gratitude and such three european leaders decently dressed and met by gopniks such gopniks, gop-stop, we approached from around the corner. yes, that's all, yes, such uh-huh well, now i'll show you the macron, at the same time. i like the professional love look. where no matter what he looks at. true, he remembers he understands very well where he is. and this is romanian. well, we found out who leads romania well, of course, as always, they asked for a lot, they received little, but still something yes, he will get uh, he doesn’t have an ethnic yes, but the president of romania, yes, and the president of

moldova is a citizen, romania, yes, but this or democratic. and this means three old wagons something interesting, what language they spoke among themselves. in what language? they are at the macron. all conversations among themselves will be funny if on russian, although i think that of course not in english in english, but in russian, she now wants to show and shut up one amazing woman. i think that for such fantastic stories it is necessary to give out the nobel prize in literature . she is running. anyway, 8 people piled up and cut off her legs and left her

grandmother, who survived, left her to die. what did the germans steal at night in her youth? the vastness of you mocked. look at that stupid face. so, this is a fool, but usually in such cases, they say, she sobbed, the whole minibus could not stop. this fool combined two old soviet jokes. the first was when they approached, when an old grandmother had to slaughter a pig, she came up to the glasses, she said, men. help, i'll be back in an hour. he’s like the dawn, he says, no, grandma don’t worry, but in a blizzard or even hard, and the second anecdote was when they approach a neighbor they say, listen, what do you have, uh, a pig is available, for the sake of jelly, kiss, belly, or something cut, but main question. this is how humiliating a fool

you have to be to paraphrase vulgar russian jokes. and thus ask a question. and what's the deal with the pig in the hut, what does the pig do in the hut, then the orcs enter the hut, and there the pig meets them. i don’t know what that is, the world runs after her and beats her. pivo beat the pig and cut off the hind legs. that is, while she herself understands, what is nonsense in russian , but the whole of ukraine believes did not laugh. and yes, he can give an anecdote to the old press? maybe it's a denisovy changer. i'm waiting now based on these stories, we will be presented with an animal welfare fund. fool of 50 million people, i just saw how stupid ukrainian propaganda works, the main theme knows, maybe pigs live in the huts of ukrainians. maybe now she will finally get married, unfortunate woman. i don't

know, i don't know who went to whom. well, who came to her, to cut off half of the brain, you know? well well, nevertheless, you understand, here, nevertheless, such nonsense is carried. and you say so. we show this to go to work krestovich. over there they collect such immoral ones, both regarding and regarding the visit. yes, there is no point in commenting on the duty statement that has been made and will be made more. i think it makes no sense to wait 2-3 days there for ukraine, everything will definitely flow, and then it will be clear what to say so, why all of a sudden, but there was such a meeting, right? it seems to me. they will try, i think, to persuade him somehow. i guess. yes, they will be inclined to negotiate. some concessions, yes, we are going to talk to him from the fact that they

so to speak, e will decline. i'm talking about what we are. we owe it to the fact that they were able to appear there. there are no doubts here, but only we could give guarantees of safety, no one else could give a visit. here are these comrades, ukraine, which a-a was sharpened, as a weapon against russia today has turned into a double-edged weapon. and here i am, only for this alone, i can explain for myself the pace of the special operation, maybe the tasks that are not quite clear, so to speak, uh, the criteria, yes, for us what is what in the end, well, until now, these are all our entrepreneurs. yes, that's why, so to speak, uh, ukraine was either thrown to the slaughter with the west. yes, uh so to speak, and uh, it is giving ashes now and a new new

world order will be established, because we can see very well that they are trying to weaken us. and we, in turn, are trying to weaken them already through it, while we are very grateful, we are weakening by a billion. per day. we get a special military operation. west such periods only money. that, yes, well nevertheless the war she so to speak, she can not bear the damage, only one side. it still brings, so to speak, and some damage to us may be, so to speak, it is acceptable to us, but nonetheless. in any case, of course, of course, another option. we don't have a business. here. i now turn to my third thesis. i believe that i do not know what decisions will be made. well, if we go to some negotiations, if we go to some agreements, if we allow them to survive, you understand already. together

understanding of ukraine - this is a dead end branch of the development of a russian person, unfortunately, it turned out that way they did it, they turned ukraine into anti-russians. they did it for them, if we are now ukrainian, you know, i know each other. if a person speaks russian, he is an enemy, if you are ukrainian, this has become, so to speak, a symbol of e. let's just say the fight against russia wow, if you're ukrainian, you must hate the russian, they didn't leave a choice, except to clean up the ukrainian double to- to shine to the last rust understand self-ukrainians. explain, i'm not saying what we should see. only those people are there. we should have just explained. e, a honorary plaviakacha. why is this song a duck, right? there are very good words, where in particular he speaks, and also we take away the language, we will not give them anything. we will

not give them ukrainian culture. we will not give them the ukrainian language, so where people want and like to speak ukrainian. they will speak ukrainian. we will not go their way, we are not going to clean up prohibit let me remind you that ukrainian culture flourished under soviet rule so well. i understand that it was artificially done. it was artificially necessary and we will continue to do it artificially. what for? and because it's a beautiful language, because it's wonderful, i'll argue. i was afraid. well, for the sake of this, they had to destroy the russian language and russian culture. no, you did not study at the ukrainian school. we were not forced to learn languages . of course, it is impossible to forbid you to always hear the ukrainian language. sometimes yes, but always understood

that you came from the village to sell something there, you understand? everything and let everything, but the harms treated this with humor. it was some kind of folklore. yes, today it was turned into a p- go right, and they raised a whole generation of people who, if you speak ukrainian, then russians, the german language will not be forced to be forced. you know how many people suffered, study german at school, goodbye. i have remained such a culture; now we will forbid the english language, because a fool or a guardian speaks in israel is called to ban the ukrainian language. i'm just saying that this is ukrainianism, which they wrote out, did you understand the language, including this symbolism there? turn them all on, all of this is built on hatred of russia, of course. if you are a carrier, here i am, everything is non-attributed, so you are a patriot of ukraine, you hate russians.

they can't do it any other way. yes, we should just explain them symmetrically to people. i'm talking about this, i'm not calling on anyone to destroy. well cultivate it so to speak cultivation here all of these, uh, this ukrainian. it must be nipped in the bud, because it contains only one semantic load and was laid back by the anti-russian, nothing else. it does not carry in itself and the last thing i wanted to say. you know, the west today, i just, uh, read. eh, that's the thing. here the americans announced such pathos in russia, a deficit began. e food carton for e for products. i don't know, maybe food cardboard, probably some important element. yes i want to say yes? but this is imagine the result, the result of hellish sanctions. yes, they are news. they rather report it in the

new food cartons. you know, here's your here's how to say it. this same this same very important have them not easier. more to say, the shortage has not begun. there, i don’t know gadgets, and a shortage of gasoline began and a shortage began. something else, the ruble didn’t fly away for 200. why we don’t have enough cardboard to america but it wasn’t by planes from germany that they transported food cardboard somewhere, that is, they are what they are starting to understand again, that is, all these attempts at negotiations very a lot of our country and thanks to the president thanks to the right calculated tactics. yes, many, many shots are still to come. well, no, no, you can't. we now understand that it is impossible to complete this operation in ukraine completely. no, you can’t go, just some hundred percent you can’t be able to when everyone is talking. you have to talk to russia a. in general, he will speak. here they are not accepted , you understand how the relationship is with us. they

push negotiations without asking us. we can talk in the morning on the scales and talk on the nightingale slava, look, vladimir zakharova, she was just on her way to a session at the st. petersburg forum, and he says, here the macron declares surprisingly. here you don’t have to humiliate russia and who needs to be humiliated, that is, it turns out that someone can be humiliated, someone cannot be humiliated, that is, the president of some france is undoubtedly a great country and some president, when well, there and now the great side of the great that he can humiliate someone or not, by the way, let me remind you that in france there is still so much responsibility for the destruction of libya no, you mean in the latter, so it’s definitely not for them and themselves to build something here. well, of course, it's interesting that they come it's interesting that they are ready to fight to the last ukrainians, but it's scary france germany italy

romania stands for the immediate status of candidate members. if ukraine is a macron, and who are you talking to? the question is different, but immediately it's some kind of status? why worry about years to you? two are needed. yes, for what, well, to enter after the status of dozens of years, it all depends on the mood of these leaders slowly, slowly seek to immediately take really longer medvedev said that in 2 years, maybe there will be no ukraine. therefore, you know how interesting. there will be an excellent status and there will be a piece of paper on which it is written and will quietly and calmly fall and there will be nowhere to land, because there will be no such country. what status do you need? that you are acting like fools, what will it give you, what has it given the baltics population loss crazy inflation crazy prices three baltic in the emirates

total unemployment for industrialization losses everything that this will give ukraine as they picked apples in poland and strawberries. this is how you collect. and this is her happiness, if only to escape from ukraine. that's how much you have to hate to do anything, just to escape from ukraine as a candidate, i'll tell you now. but in continuation of what igor olegovich said here about the lack of food cardboard. what is this time times? yes, it's a headline. putin takes away from us, uh, fish snack chips do. yes, but they also came up with a sailor on every corner, running an armadillo, then. this is zheleznyak, when kherson came out, i mean, you understand, and here is the headline of the newspapers. putin takes away you start reading. why cod cod banned only russian cod? here, moreover,

these british owners, it’s not the poet who ran russian cod in general, it’s expensive for them to carry far. yes, they buy norwegian. and then putin but you know, they banned the sanctions, banned russian cod to buy. as a result, the cod flew into the price, the norwegians are cashing in on these same british eateries, they do not have enough money to buy this very one. putin is to blame takes away the most expensive insurance logic. that is, this is all russophobia they have there and an ash pan from any corner. they tell you putin is to blame. in this, the cat abandoned the kittens. it's putin 's fault and everything and everywhere everywhere it means it's coming. that is. uh, as for fakes about jelly from pork legs. yes. um hmm listen. so, well, some aunt told me. you will open. unian agency ukrainian once. their main agency was considered there, if the neander already said, then

there is no need to double-check, once upon a time it was such a long time ago. now, if you let me now, well, every message is something like this, they recently had news, one of the main news was quoted by all kherson region. these same orcs, as they say, are occupiers. yes, they mean, because no bills, full of hunger. they hire local kherson residents to pick strawberries at 50 hryvnias per hour and they are paid. do you understand? what terrible invaders, yes, they could shoot and rape everyone in a row there, what is there, what do they do, and then they do it, then they take the strawberries, and after receiving the money they shoot you know, and that's it. well, that's what they don't give out every day. just like that on the stream and believe. well, in any case, someone else who has absolutely losses, well, now he is sorting out losses with losses. yes, because when from 60 to 100 it has already reached 1,000,000. yes, it's just that ukraine's participation

is at least realistically understood . they say up to 1,000 ukrainian soldiers - this is an interview given by rahami and to the american to publish their accessories up to 1,000 american well said ukrainian soldiers are killed or injured every day in the donbass in eastern ukraine, on average from 200 to 500 killed and many more injured, but sorry, this is only in the donbass not yet a bow. yet. well, everything is closer and closer in fact to real numbers. this is also some kind of progress. and now about the status of the candidate and the visit of this collective route. yes, e macron scholz dredge. yes? here they also tell me, it’s necessary to cheer up, and yohana mashodra, yes, it turns out he has already arrived. here, well, what am i to the fact that, uh, this car arrived, and they begin to

discuss it. by the way, we have, again, that the agency does not report on i just posted a post like this, it was necessary to have this information agency, it was necessary for my schoolgirl not to give a taxi in uh to the station. and, when he called zelensky and asked where the taxi would be in august, he would say, imagine these are such news agencies. now in ukraine they are rejoicing, having fun, as a dear man came to them with good news about the immediate the status of the candidate, they still omit him and will not care to spit. oh, you give us so much, in fact, it's the features who decided that everyone owes them. well, because i say it again, this is reality. their whole ideology is based on this, everyone should be fed, everyone should know, and it has always been like this, honestly chekhov in politics, not a single one has always been like that.

hello, i'm already in crimea, the weather is wonderful 30 ° , no one is rushing to the most interesting place, when i tell them about what i feel, they listen, but they don't hear. and that's bad no one can rewrite

our history. this is just one of the folders prepared by the soviet accusations for the international military tribunal in nuremberg, no one will always close the borders for us. always online mouth so strong. wow, it won't break in the cold, we are watching the masterpieces of world documentary cinema. i'm talking about something new. gagarin was discovered for himself. he is a hero. a real hero. now we really miss the classics, new items, exclusives. 15 years free without registration

remember petlyura's treaties there with the poles and the germans in 18-20, everything is on this hat. and here turned out to be a thief for my thief, but only one thieves friends, what should i do? and why and here they announced the good news. tomorrow, the european commission will almost certainly approve this very status of candidates. ah, it is necessary, immediately it is necessary to slowly accept, at the same time. i look at the crisis in the eurozone will be such a weapon will be so much misunderstood. in

their newspapers, yes, for their public, they explain that you understand, there will be no european union for ukraine, no, no, so that in no case is it even close to being ready. and it's unlikely to once it is ready, but you understand, if we don’t give the status now, what will be the signal for ukrainians and for russia it will be a gift to putin but, but today a very revealing editorial column, the financial editorial column emphasized nothing there. times where it is written that ukraine must immediately be given the status of candidates for the european union and there is a very good phrase. why, for what, and that there was always a membership carrot in front of them, so it is written by the members' members, that is, the membership carrot. you understand in front of whom they hang a carrot, yes, and who has been following this carrot for years non-stop constantly for this membership. forgive me. you can't throw away the words from the song. and well, finally to

ukraine like a scythe that goes for this very carrot, but you need to hang it in front of him. imagine yes in all seriousness now, when the swiss say, the british say, the danes say, we are already tired of the ukrainians. well , when they cut off the assistance program in almost all countries, and now they are told by the european union of public opinion. look no, writes. yes that evseev to europe well, not all europeans, but europeans for the most part say that already hand over to putin what he wants, here today's newspaper , citing public opinion issues, among europeans, therefore ukraine is the main thing, ukraine is wildly annoying with its phenomenal rudeness. that 's the point. this is all through the lip of manners, but from somewhere they saw them filed by female relatives. that's awful provincial manners. no, well, listen, well, what kind of zelensky

when it had to happen, he is in malinovka yes treasury the lads laugh at the fact that we are without a gold reserve. i'm not a gateman, not a gateman at all, you know, and when this trinity arrives, at least two of them. yes, they come again to talk about the world, yes, that is, gentlemen. or maybe we'll answer for the minsk talks first. maybe we can answer for 8 years, when you were fooling around there in the normandy format, and at that time, and ukraine was stuffed with weapons. maybe you will answer first for this, before bringing some new peace initiatives, which, again, but the second layer will go again. let's freeze the conflict for a while. we are now pumping up ukraine again. they will already teach and train their own, and the kerbats already yes, because there the professional has already been shot, and here we will start, we will start the war first, yes, that is, no. yes, no, such stories don’t take off anywhere, secondly, and now , well, there’s an obvious division, that is, now germany and france, and even more so, they are romania

. you understand that everything is very close. and the romanians generally understand that it goes clearly in their direction, that now they will come and very close, and then for the supply of weapons for stolen wheat for all sorts of sorties for ukrainian planes at their airfields, you will have to answer for all this and you will have to answer not in words and not in concepts, you will have to answer specifically about some kind of torah there there will be sanctions, or agreements, or restrictions, well, somehow they will definitely pay for it. now germany also understands very well, and after them the statement of the british immediately flies, who say no in which case we will not allow any peace any territorial concessions. nothing will split between the europeans understand the danger, and they go just in case to agree on something, the americans and the british. they say no, we have stocks, so let's let it continue in ukraine on the street divided said that biden wildly yelled at austin to stop generally calmer rhetoric. in

feeling. come that is, he just understands what russia said. you let sasha militancy. calm down, you understand, your ukrainians and germans will win. they don't understand that it's all very close, that it's all very real, and that now it's going to start thumping very close. here, especially since even if it doesn’t start to bang, the french and germans, and the poles. come on, the poles, it’s true, they are sitting on excuse me, on actively subsidizing the americans, that is, they understand the number of people who came there and the refugees who need to be supported, but to pacify, and so on, the number of people who will bring there weapons that are there will remain, which will be used when the government definitely does not need it. well, the list goes on. that is, they understand that everything is close and everything. it's extremely extremely palpable, so it's just that it's all a story, and the little things like the idea. now, if now ukraine urgently accepts the european union, this is such a rich idea , economic crises, immediately crazy, just crazy crime rates. it will take off

colossally while ukraine will depopulate at the moment. it is necessary to open the border, and in the same place they offer crayfish immediately to immediately open the border to take checkpoints, that's all, immediately immediately offers to call for another 2 million and can you imagine how fast they will drape from ukraine so as not to be on the front line. now these are about two million. but i'm wondering when people start to sober up, that's when they begin to understand that listen, well, tomorrow they will come for you, that is, people who potentially get caught. here in this segment, which can go to fight him, and in ukraine there are so many, that is, in reality. it will end somewhere. well, 4.5 million is all if to clean up everything in general, yes, that is, this is half of this woman, then the age limit, then the children, then the disabled, then, and so on and so forth. so you will succeed here, and rachamia went there, and he counted himself there. interestingly, they also considered themselves. there you can not minus the oligarchs minus the power. s uh,

golden youth minus minus minus yes, it’s almost zero and it turns out, that is, they are those who will be sent now, but these are a million and two. yes, that is, and here add to each each person add at least three. this children. these are wives. this is the mother. these are the parents. yes add here. and you will understand that every family in ukraine will receive its own coffin. that is, for this , the army went there to sell this coffin, that is, we didn’t do it, that is, we didn’t climb, but it was n’t us who climbed into the donbass in february, yes, that is, it wasn’t we concentrated 150,000 near our houses and tried to start war. ukraine started it all and now it has gone, guys. let's continue the deal. we are still ready to add millions without spending. that is, on in fact, after all, the figure that they are shown, they see a realistic one. that is, now, when they talk about this thousand. that is, i think that if we are talking about really, here we have 110 days there, in my opinion, how many there are 112,113 days, and the escalation, which is called the ukrainian side. that's somewhere in this order is i'm not talking about the dead. i'm talking about the fact that these are the people that

you were from the war, that is, this is the floor of the army of the original 250.000. now half the army. sorry already cancelled. that is, you think about that, in general come to consciousness, understand, and what what is it about? as you and i raise a number of questions here together. that is, i think that we should not be like the ukrainian side. that is, when we say, let's ban the ukrainian language, the ukrainian language is not to blame, the ukrainian regime is to blame, which used the language to pump people up, that is, you should not make second-class speakers from ukraine, you should not do what they do when they tell what they say. if you are russian-speaking, then you are not a titular nation, then you if you lose your rights, you'll be there, we can't go for it. that is, if we want these people to be equal with us, that we want people to think about it, in the end, in order for their enlightenment to pass, you don’t need to do it, you don’t need to force it. you don't have to twist your arms. we need to bring back the opportunity to learn russian . it is necessary to give commitment to the great russian culture and must in the end. let's look at our tomorrow, this is how we will have

tomorrow. that is, i don't want tomorrow to be with these are some cruel restrictions. you know today. here, thank god, the economic forum is coming. uh, in st. petersburg and there there are leaders of our republics, there are. everything and leonid pasechnik there is denis pushilin, and the issue is already being actively raised there. and yes, we understand that we will make a democratic procedure, we will first analyze security. let's make sure that it's not scary, that people are free from a military strike from and then, then we will carry out democratic procedures. we will still be with russia let's decide how to proceed. yes, that is republics of autonomy, but this is an entry in the form of a province. what interval? let's release now, and then you decide now, you need to talk now, discuss it now, because the image of tomorrow is made up of these parts, you understand where people will be in this society, like how quickly we can restore the economy. we are not for war. it's all something. we found out today. here you raised the question. it's just that the ministry of internal affairs was immediately at the feet of the

head of the migration service. lieutenant general, went on the air to us. everything told everything to grind off, on the contrary, they gave incorrect information, on the contrary, no one presses. no one interferes in 3 days, the answer is no one is expelled , covid restrictions have been removed. so now please come and stay. only as much as needed, that is, no one will be sent anywhere by the middle of august . there will be no pressure. now the deputies, now a bunch of documents, how they will accept on this occasion, she told, and she said that konstantin fedorovich zatulin is really a draft law, so that also what we are talking about here they told those who claim refugee status not to take away their ukrainian passports, that is, everything is spelled out. so everything works. everything will be fine. thank you very much for raising this topic, and that this topic really needs to take on a real shape, and in order for people to feel that they are not at home with them, these restrictions.

this is the first time that an independent state of the dpr lpr takes part in the st. petersburg forum, right? about advertising, so that every entrepreneur can just do his own business, the government introduced a moratorium for scheduled and unscheduled inspections of businesses throughout russia in case of its violation. leave a complaint on the public service portal and receive an answer within 24 hours that he is ready to consider the issue of unblocking. that is, he is ready. storyteller, and now he's got to know vladimir's daughter in regards to the plot that you showed the woman. i think professor preobrazhensky would say, what

a fine specimen. and i don't have a free room for her. entirely one deputies and politicians. well, because here's their actually such things in a lot on the internet. when you speak, they believe, but simply no one else speaks there. here in ukraine , no one speaks anymore. here are those who have the right to speak. here they are broadcasting such things, and other people have the right to speak. no, yesterday i only raised the issue of banning political parties. the party was banned today. well, they took it and banned it, everything is fine. now, with regard to europeans, when you say, why do ukrainians behave in such a way in relation to europeans, what do you say? they owe everything, in fact, they owe them, i'll tell you they owe them a secret, because everything that happened with ukraine can be said as much as you like that it was the americans, their goals and objectives were clear. and americans understand. they are cynical open

people who want a coup, they write we will carry out coups. everything is clear here. there is nothing to argue here with the question of spinelessness and meanness of europeans. you see, it all started with them and everything continues, thanks to her, everything began with guarantees. uh, remember that they did not give yanukovych and then they were not fulfilled, they went aside, and now it lasts 8 years the minsk agreements that i spoke about. eh, rodion, they are not so determined. yes, that is, what is this from the side of the conflict? this is who, who? with whom the europeans are fighting, they did not give an answer to this question. and this conflict lasted for a long 8 years, solely due to their spinelessness and unscrupulousness. by and large, it is the europeans, by and large, with their inaction, that have allowed in ukraine to implement, that military bloody, the project that is being implemented today, therefore, the ukrainians. not well, we are our own for you. they don't even hide. they. we are fighting in ukraine for your europe, so, of

course, you owe us. you owe us. they tell us ukrainians, they say we will give you a candidacy. e, so to speak, e membership of the candidacy due to or membership in the candidacy here is incomprehensible. and i'm asking a question. and what does it give ukraine well, what does it give in europe, i understand when you acquire this status. you also acquire certain e, you get some more certain obligations to those where you want to integrate, that is, the europeans, they will continue to dictate to us the conditions that ukraine should do what she should do? and i'm asking a question. and this candidacy is what it gives to ukraine well, what will change in the life of ukrainians, if the country becomes a candidate among them, this is what will change, but nothing will change for people, in fact, in addition to the fact that we take obligations, well , no feedback no, it's the same with uh, trying to retreat into members. nato come on, what's the point

of nato's obligations to ukraine, but does ukraine have obligations to nato? well, it's okay. they they feel great so why ukraine says that it is fighting for europe well, because it was just afraid with us. yes? well, well, they are presenting it, which is only due to the fact that ukraine is now at war with the russian federation . no, throughout europe, that is, ukraine is holding back the orcs in the face. i don't know if they will . yes, that's it. only thanks. this war, so to speak, did not acquire such proportions. e continental on the same stupidity was filled with stupidity. yes, they argue, but nevertheless it works. it works in europe and it works in ukraine they really believe. what yes, thanks to the ukrainians. why such, uh, sociological polls? you believe because they believe. yes, thanks to the ukrainians who are fighting and only thanks to the ukrainians no, no, the ukrainians, whom they are fighting

in the house, are not ukrainians, who are far from the house, some are already in the ground. and in fact the fate of these people. it is of little interest to anyone, i'm not in europe with me. yesterday we showed porridge, it turns out to be enough to say. yes, i'm not trained and that's it. it cut loose. something they didn't guess excellent level for an ordinary ukrainian. i am unusual, but for an ordinary ukrainian vladimir, this is not enough, he will be drafted into the army. dependency is all in my head. uh, a video of one, uh, surrendered azov man, yes, who calls his wife , probably after a week or a week and a half. well, they gave him the opportunity to call zhenya, he

asks her, and someone from my unit called you, in general, he asked where i was, where i went to you, maybe they wanted to help with something. she says no one tells me about anything at all asked. well, you can imagine. yes , i’m already talking about those people who are buried there namelessly, yes, as we discussed it yesterday with flags, they don’t even know who these people are, but this is a living person, yes, who is in captivity, he is gone, already 2 weeks in location. there e that part or there. the grottoes or the battalion do not care about this at all. and the last thing i want to say about the language, you know, vasily is fluent in russian. he studied well in the soviet school. yes, and thanks to this, he stands in solovyov's studio, he could stand, by the way, any other studio, for example, in the polish one and perform there, and i ask a question. and if he

knew only the ukrainian language, he could stand in solovyov's studio or in the polish studio, but i have it when a person who did not speak more than one language. i understand you have different people there are studios. yes, yes, it happens. i'm just leading to what i'm leading to the fact that you can perfectly know the ukrainian language, but if knowledge of the ukrainian language limits your possibilities of self-realization. you you will have to learn other languages. why should people be forced to spend additional financial resources on family and without that people do not live richly so that their children have great opportunities for self-realization. why ban it? what for? that's for sure? well, why, if a person wants to? let him learn russian english spanish, the more languages ​​a person knows, the more opportunities he has. they even compare ukrainian and russian without even realizing that russian is the language of interethnic communication -

this is the language of the united nations but for them you know it, this is a dark forest and the last state you know will be. yes, the state will be comfortable only when the state can speak the language of its citizens. so far, he will not learn to speak the language of his citizens, there is no comfortable life. in this state there will be no constant conflict over eu membership sergei lavrov also said. if ukraine is given this roadmap to prepare for membership, which will only mean one thing is that the european union is once again ready to turn a blind eye to all its criteria that have always existed for candidates and is ready to be guided solely by geopolitical considerations. you see, they have the whole uh, the process is a mixture of play ah and serious intentions, but games, of course more and generally staged

a lot. but we mean, so to speak, e in europe and in the western world, and processes that resemble e, a club of cheerful and resourceful, for example, there are 95, everything is staged and played out like clockwork. well sometimes they're true false even for a-a from the point of view of their logic. julia is fake, well, it's just not a complete quote. there , sergey viktorovich also said that he would give ukraine membership for a package of packages, probably. excuse me. well, you see, as usual, there are two parallel realities. yes , here is one alternative, uh, where three representatives of the european union come. and, to be honest, you know, it seemed to me? well, i'm sorry, i didn't mean to offend romania came out on strength. i just forgot the girl's memory. uh, i think it was very marvelous. it was very surprising for europe

in the first place, because they arrived and just got off the train to the platform. they started making excuses. here it is, the ingratiating tone, we are not not we, you did not understand us. you understand, we didn't say that we want to save putin's face. we do not refuse to supply you with weapons. you know, i still have enough. here, unfortunately, and zelensky by virtue of his own. then it is very rare for anyone to look at him from the bottom up, as it were, yes, but here is the feeling that they have arrived make excuses. they came to ask to offer and even beg for the favor of someone universal, and he is there like a master yes, that is, even this is his dress code, his demonstrative disregard for the boy’s protocol, they don’t know, it was deliberate. it even seems to me that this one is covered. excuse me, as it were, but there it is clear that genetically modified foods are already bearing fruit on his body. well, excuse me, yes, but here is

a woman. usually such things are also noticed. that's why yes, well, it's bad here. but when he is it is with schultz, it is directly visible there, you know everything and when the leader of european countries, which a give them money b gives them weapons c. yes, they are there they promise something to him a suit, they literally humiliate themselves in front of him for what, but look at the same schoolgirl. are we not only that he is with the messenger like that fish on the parcels? yes, and miller can say everything he says. well, except that he doesn’t peck at him, while still publicly. this is still. i think a little more will start to do it. yes? okay, but the italians. well italians. i understand that the dredge is against the background of scholz and macron. he had a more or less decent appearance, as it were, yes. well, why? he also came there to observe how these two were humiliated, so that later he could say? i saw how you peredelensky crept there. it 's very embarrassing. it's very embarrassing. i hope the european voters have looked at all this and drawn their conclusions once again. of course i want to say, thank you lord that we live the strength we have

president vladimir vladimirovich yes, who is the studio vladimir vladimirovich vladimir vladimirovich, too, and there is an objective reality, if if what is such a possibility? here i have the last photo in the feed, if i can show it, if possible, yes, just this morning, but in principle, this is not an ending process for us. we have news coming from gorlovka from donetsk yes, there are light blue and so on. and you're looking at it all, what's going on, right? and when mr. zelensky said today that he spoke with his guests about the needs of ukraine for powerful weapons and that he needs a lot of help and dropped such a phrase every weapon means lives saved. well, as it were, yes, the phrase, of course, is in itself from the yes series of the uroll series. he would have appreciated it for sure, and then the news comes that france will supply ukraine with six additional 155 mm artillery mounts.

caesar declared macron. yes, and i would like to show something, that is, let's find these photos. and in my feed. she stands extreme here it is here. georgy medvedev filmed this gorlovka this is a kindergarten , please, this is also a typical picture typical, gorlovka has been living for the ninth year. that's it, but i understand why they hit infrastructure facilities, because they also believe that we use the infrastructure facility just like they do, you are already alive ukrainian mayor, because the orcs struck there for 14 seconds, and there you can see, well, the boxes are good gun cases. i just why they just don’t understand that we are not like them , this doesn’t come to mind.

always wondering where it all starts? manufacturers of good things want and most importantly. but it's best to check.

hello alexander, before the start of our live broadcast, we discussed that you have a very busy agenda, including the agreement signed by the participants in some sessions. tell us more about what exactly is discussed on the first day.