as far as the people's republic of china is concerned, our relations with china. well, with asian countries in general? well, yes, with china in particular. we started building them not in connection with the latest events, the events of recent years. e, the creation of new e, centers of world development was indicated. well, everyone understands it, everyone sees it, they know it. well, just look at china's gdp, how much is it? well, yes, he was now a little bit there, seven percent, and now there are more than five percent. well, it doesn't matter, this

adjustment is inevitable. everything is clear, but they are absolutely leaders and you understand, so, uh, growth the us gdp in recent years, how much it was one and seven, in my opinion, the gdp in the eurozone, in my opinion, is even less, and in asia, uh, five or more. well, that's all for you. here are the trends , you understand such trends in the world. we are not , and accordingly we have been building our relations for many years. we have a trade struggle of 140 billion and will grow this year. he will probably be more rekorm. not because the current political situation forces us to do so. no a, because it's objective objective pictures in the world. thus they add up. we are interested and profitable to cooperate. e with china especially since we have a very stable relationship of trust politically. uh, we have a wonderful personality and friendly relations with the chairman. in the full sense of the word. this

creates a good atmosphere for uh, building uh, interstate communications, but this does not mean at all that uh china should play along with us in everything or uh, or accompany us, as we are not expected to have state interests and the chinese leadership, just like us, primarily proceeds from their national interests, but they do not conflict with each other. that's the problem. if any questions arise. they are probably in the course of e in the course of a particular work always. arise at the departmental level, then e nature and quality between public relations allows us to always find solutions sure, so will continue. you've been talking now and before that you've been talking a lot about this for the last few years. speak about the freedom of enterprise. even were statements and yours from the government that in general this is what we actually

have to continue to develop and due to which we must withstand this, uh, load or blow, well, really incredible sanctions that were recognized to destroy and president of kazakhstan kasym jamar, kemerovich. i also talked about this very recently. let me quote you. you said that in the new fair kazakhstan there should be no place for police arbitrariness by an incompetent and biased prosecutor. i do not know how things are going. and with this in kazakhstan, i hope that you will now tell us about this too, and here, vladimir vladimirovich, i will probably upset you with this, you don’t talk about it all the time. say well, now people will come out of the hall and go. this will discuss smoking and will talk. well, here again the chief said about it, and again he will not hear him, because the number of landings in the pre-trial detention center for entrepreneurial articles does not change, according to some reports it is growing. at least many times i was told not to do it. and you know how

someone in our state. there is some kind of deep anti-state, like the deep state in america, and we have some kind of anti- stress, to which you are not a decree and the law that you followed. and this is very sad. maybe it can be somehow, well, more severely eradicated, for example, to legally abolish these plantings in the season. i think many will agree that there are several dozen evaders. criminal prosecution in this way will do less harm to our country than this system does harm, in which it is not the society that is protected in this way, but the interests there are some specific dishonest people. this is a thin sphere. i spoke about this just now, and now we are speaking from the side and from the side and in the interests of the business community. most of them are here, and i understand your concern.

that's exactly what i was talking about . illegal legal actions. only yes of course, millions of people ask themselves. where are the states looking? and why don't they protect us ordinary citizens, so this balance is right here. this is not true. simply put, by the way. you just mentioned about hmm about the fact that we have some kind of pressure there, but i want to return us to the real world of today, but they took it from our entrepreneurs and stole property just out of the blue. uh, punishing for their activities for their work in russia is some kind of nonsense where are these principles. uh,

observance of the inviolability of private property, sanctions often, uh, concern people and the selection of property occurs from people who have nothing to do with the state at all, have nothing to do with the decisions made by the political leadership of the country. these are just individuals who honestly worked. uh, nothing illegal in our country. not done abroad. their property was taken from them, taken away. what is it? well, it generally crosses all boundaries. not just allowed common sense even in fact, in front of the stupas where they sat, because frankly speaking, uh, many people are connected with the economy. we are the west , and to a certain extent were the conductor, well, not the interests of the west, but in any case we were supporters of the development of relations. but, when everything was taken away from them, of course, as i am not supporters from now on, you will say fie on

you, in what year in 2004 they said you are tormented by the dust of swallowing around the office, and defends your rights there. well, that's what happened. unfortunately, but i'm talking about the fact that we have nothing doesn't this happen? yes, there are problems, of course , there are, otherwise, i didn’t talk about it, and , uh, facing, uh, with today’s. e difficulties caused by external pressure, of course. i constantly talk about this and repeat it, but to respond effectively. we can only uh, only by increasing the space of freedom for citizens in general and for business in particular. but this also applies, of course, to the activities of law enforcement agencies. she also needs improvement. uh, so and uh, the number of cases filed, not brought before the court. that speaks most clearly about this, if the cases were brought to court and not brought to court, what about what? this suggests that they were most likely initiated to put pressure on business,

there is such a problem. but of course there is, so the most important thing here is not to hide from it. the most important thing is not to turn a blind eye to it. we are not going to do this, but we are going to, on the contrary. gently not violating the interests of society. in general, i will analyze the system to make the law enforcement sphere work for the interests of the whole society, including the business community, for which certainly depends a lot today and which has shown its maturity its patriotic work effectively. and here are the packages. i assure you, the paints will be made, including efforts on representatives of the business community in russia, well, understanding this state, of course, it will do everything that depends on us to support such such people, uh, and we will e build such such i work in law enforcement. well, i repeat once again, and there, of course, there are unscrupulous people. why aren't they, right? yes, of course, so look at the number of landings. uh, among law enforcement officers unscrupulous

law enforcement officers. this also has a place to be, and there is also work to clean up their ranks, but we also need a regulatory framework in this way. uh, uh, polish it up so that automatically. there's no unnecessary pressure on this . let's work on it. i assure you we understand this and will do it consistently. well, as for kazakhstan, what about the current president, eh? discussed many questions i know they pay a lot of attention to this too, not by chance, although hmm i do n’t say it very much now. greetings but, uh, well, let's say in the field of it technology. uh, many specialists are happy to go to kazakhstan and work there today from russia because the conditions are good, we will follow the example from kazakhstan. return back thank you for such a compliment,

really. we create the most favorable work opportunities for our russian colleagues friends who come to work with us believing that this is not a permanent phenomenon. perhaps in time they will return to their homeland in russia well, in any case, uh, it is here and here that we must u be together and, of course, reject people who, for one reason or another, decided to work in our country is absolutely impossible, answering u , to your question regarding law enforcement reform. here i fully agree with vladimir vladimirovich that this is a very difficult job. a very difficult problem. regarding this issue. it is impossible to decide, but in any case, we must try to do because people see injustice. this gives rise to social depression. that is why i decided to create a special

commission that deals with the return to state property and assets that were privatized illegally using administrative and political resources. in addition, i created a commission headed by the prosecutor general, which will deal with the return of financial resources illegally exported abroad, realizing that this is a difficult job, but you need to go through a large number of procedures, but nevertheless, again, this work needs to be done, as for the system, then in september i will announce a new package of reforms related to the reformatting of the judicial system. this is a very urgent problem for kazakhstan in any case, uh, the

reform of the police service is being carried out now. uh, the so -called service model is the three-zen model. e, she goes e not without difficulty. it is a reform, however, assuming that we will eventually succeed, the main thing is the presence of political will. and, of course, the support of the citizens of the country, if the citizens our society, as a whole, demands this reform and supports it, then it thinks that we will achieve final success, because, of course, those models that existed before, they may have their purpose in the past, but now. uh, we had vacillations in the law enforcement system during the reforms, then we went into humanization, used the experience of european countries, who went in the direction of tightening, that is, there was no constant constant and a clear understanding of what we want,

and now where , eventually. now we have the so-called golden mean, which is clearly based on the needs of our citizens who want to see reliable protection in the face of the police. and most importantly , not corrupt people. eh, again this is a difficult task. understand me that i'm not going to declare a great idea and then at the same moment forget about them uh, but this has to be done, as far as china is concerned, uh was very interesting talking about this country. i myself am a sinologist by my first profession, and i know well this wisdom, which i brought today. what's in each opportunity? crisis

that is, this word crisis consists of two and rollers. i still remember how they, how they are written. the first hieroglyph is the danger, the second hieroglyph is the opportunity in every crisis. there is a danger of inflicting an opportunity. i think we should start from that. uh -huh and by the way, speaking of, uh, you said about huawei. i, uh, spent almost 8 years in china and i had the opportunity to visit this company. at the very beginning of its activities in the area, i still remember when this company was located in three rooms, then, of course, no one believed that it would later become a global company, but it happened. and what is the success of china in my opinion, firstly, they managed to very pragmatically build the concept, that is, the capitalist mode of production.

essential goods were sold abroad, they earned money, they brought this money to china , they invested in the development of technology, including the acquisition of these bodies, technologies in various ways abroad. what did trump say the former president of the united states of america was offended by the chinese, but in fact, uh, they achieved great success in the technological sphere and set the task at the last party congress to turn the whole country into a cyberpower. so i think it is here, uh, lurks, the secrets of their success, that is, the right choice of priority. you see, how you spoke about the

protection of entrepreneurs of the entrepreneurial community, uh, vladimir yes, it's good. that means we are kazakh colleagues. now i spoke about the return of illegally exported capital. so you've seen it and it's legal, and now the state is taking it back. our entrepreneurs. in any case, many laws took their capital abroad, they were robbed there. now you understand, so the conclusion is about something. i said speaking invest. we must at home our native country, and our task - is to ensure the safety of these position. we will do so. and remember, this seems to be in response to the poles. you have been talking for a long time. a half lady should think about the house. when you say, what is there, or what? you better not think that someone here thinks it's better there, i think, uh, now it's only clinical idiots or obviously a hypocrite can

believe that there are practiced those very values, these very principles that we were fed and fed them to us, as the only possible, and the right word is the right of ownership. i say this as the editor-in-chief of a satellite artist who didn’t close in one day, right? and today they have approved the tradition that assange will be imprisoned for 175 years in america and he will die in prison. well, it's hard for me to talk about it. this is our former employee who led the program. and in general this is a great journalist for him for his journalistic activity will be imprisoned, so what kind of property right is there with elementary rights just to life to freedom of speech, everything turned out to be completely different from what we believed in the ninetieth, but we are not there, we are here, therefore, this is completing this topic. i want to ask you about, uh, the administrative guillotine. remember, there's also the government. medvedev started this thing. finally, the administration we have

many of them, but there is no guillotine. and well, those rules that guide many departments that come from inspections. they are often written back there in the sixties to the seventies. they are often simply irrelevant. they can no longer be fulfilled. that is, uh , once upon a time. probably it really was important. it protected the right of the consumer. anyone there, yes, a simple person, what are you talking about, this is certainly important, because it will also be impossible not to follow everything, a solid winter cherry. we do not bring the lord yes, everything will burn there, and there are also a lot of other dishonest people, but to put things in order with these rules. it seems to me necessary. you are so good surgeon, vladimiroveshsya. they know it, when it comes to this scalpel, i 'll give you a hand as an example, we had 33 checks last year, despite all these prohibitions 33 and some of what they come with? it’s just, well, you don’t know whether to laugh or cry, i don’t complain about the fact that you understand how

people come to. if it weren’t for this administrative guillotine, which dmitry anatolyevich medvedev also spoke about as president, you would have had not 33 checks, but 133 very much, i can readily believe, it would have happened, therefore, uh, after all, this the guillotine works a huge number of thousands of obsolete rules are canceled here margarita you are wrong. they've been cancelled, they don't really work. i'm sure if we gave the opportunity, uh, to the business representatives in the hall to say this, they would find, uh, formulate confirmation, because what i just said, uh, well, at the same time, many supported the fighting, that indeed, not everything in this regard has been done yet, but that is precisely why i said today that it is necessary in general, uh, to cancel all sorts of checks and not run around with risk checks oriented only checks to carry out, that is, to act only there, er, checking

organizations. where activities are related to ensuring the life and health of citizens, everything else is done remotely to create conditions so that the business community does not try to violate anything, it turns out to be possible to do everything, therefore, uh, after all, a lot has been done along this path, but we don't stop and move on. thank you, the whole world was waiting for our economy, torn to shreds, not the whole world, and here is the part of the world that is actually a minority, uh, and remember that 83% of the human population lives in countries that support us or at least do not join the sanctions. so don't wait. this fabric, from which we are sewn with the sewing of our economy, turned out to be stronger than they can handle , and we all watched with great joy, well, in fact, the lightning steps of the government. i, uh, scolded, scolded, yes, administrative glitches and

stuff, but it’s impossible not to praise how it was done, especially at first, when well, really, well, it was impossible to imagine that we would not have such a jump in inflation, which we were promised, that there would not be 200 dollars when they closed the sky, and our ministry of transport closed it to them the next day with lightning speed. that is, uh, there is a feeling that everything is working god will give more or less at the limit of possibilities. in a good sense of the word, that is, no, you know those who could, yes, sluggishness. before our e, there is no such thing. perhaps there is no such feeling at all. well question. are they the time, maybe it's different look at the system itself, what i mean . it was so interesting today that they said that it is important not just to replace imports, it is important to do something new so that they can catch up with us later. yes, this applies to technology, if i understand you correctly, industrial production. well, maybe this also applies to the economic model. as such, see.

here is the market all the years they tell us about the market about capitalism, but now they are starting to look at it differently, today at the session and the web they talked about the fact that capitalism in such a cottage, right? in the sense of the word themselves and lived and entrepreneurs should have a different attitude to the place where they live to think about their home, there is another category of expert people who say that the state. oddly enough, it’s time to intervene more in economic processes, because the same elon musk would not have become elon musk if he were just a free entrepreneur. he lives on the order of the pentagon and he is the same free entrepreneur as bbc independent television. in fact, people talk about that the state can regulate the new industry more tightly and thus a completely new economic model grows. what do you think about this? i say, i spoke about this publicly at one of the international online events, i was talking about the fact that the old models on the capitalist

system take over and shrink when it comes only to making a profit here, the world enters such a phase of development, when it is necessary and necessary everyone is forced to think, not only about this, but about the fact that the world why because here, if continue further, then the world becomes eminently balanced and the threat is growing in this problem. uh, this is the challenge of the time, uh, and therefore, in order to maintain this balance, you need to act differently, just its balancers and do not pay attention. on all the components that lead to a violation of this balance. uh, this is about today, for example, with the same food. with the same fertilizers and so on. but how if , uh, if if, like this, behave like this, uh, the largest economies in the world will vacuum all goods from the world market. yes, including food products to take home . this means that this problem will grow.

this will lead to something not just famine, it will lead to a new wave of emigration with a migration flow that will overwhelm, uh, is already overwhelmed by the same united states , uh, they want to build this one there. uh, it means that the wall is on the border with mexico, or they don’t want to, but the flows are coming, they are not decreasing, there are internal political ones, uh, can the former current presidents argue with each other as much as they like? what about immigrant flows? i say uh famine, if in africa god forbid comes and uh, this is economic migration increasing to europe and what to do with it? and it’s very simple to do. then just, uh, it means to stop. this is the attitude towards world affairs, when they think only about their loved ones and that’s it. e in this in this. and if this continues, it will lead to serious problems, so, of course, we need to move on to another

model. e economy is not regulation, but it is such a complex process. uh, i think that the inevitability is still world society to this will come. uh, well, as for us, i already said, here we fit into this general hmm, this paradigm in this is the main movement in this global trend. of course, first of all, we should think, uh, about what my colleague from kazakhstan, the president of kazakhstan, also said, because, first of all, to pay attention. uh issues of economic growth based on technological development, but new models of economic management and uh, social political sphere. that's when then we can provide leadership where we have our comments.

you also think that, well, fundamental changes, as vladimir vladimirovich said, there is no economic model of the world economy, as you inevitably consider it inevitable. i think that life itself dictates a similar need from the other side. i agree with what the president of the russian federation said about the impossibility, and the absence of the need to go into self-isolation

, nevertheless, i am a supporter of international cooperation, be it political and, moreover , investment trade cooperation. i spoke about this in my speech today. if somewhere it does not work out in one direction. we must go to another direction, because the world is like that. uh, now uh, pursue a policy of self-reliance . absolutely impossible indeed there is no possibility. china china china is of great importance for kazakhstan, as we have a common market that unites us with a border of more than 2,000 kilometers. everything that is produced by us , either raw materials or, let's say, finished products

chocolate vegetable oil finds a very wide demand and consumption in the chinese market, so we value our relationship with the people's republic of china - this is a reliable partner, so as not to talk about china in the modern world. therefore, from the point of view of regional cooperation, let alone global aspects. we are for not going into self-isolation. and, of course, work with each other to find opportunities. it is very difficult to survive alone now, of course. in russia, there are much, great opportunities, because the economy is relatively large . uh, big we have fewer options. frankly, although the potential of the kazakh economy is quite significant , in any case, in central asia, our

economy is larger than e. economics. central asian countries combined, but of course, we are not e. we treat this presumptuous, we are constantly in shape, constantly alert. we will inevitably move on to another topic, yes, it is impossible to go to ukraine without ukraine. now, probably, no discussion, but before that how do i ask a question to vladimir vladimirovich i

, as you know, on television, they say, on tv shows, taking the opportunity i want taking the opportunity. and i want to remind you how we met a year ago with you from the russian editors-in-chief. uh, the media then it was published. we had just returned from donetsk with colleagues and were under the impression, of course, very difficult and we asked you if russia was going to help these exhausted people who looked at us with such hope and they had no one else to hope for and i, well, we experienced difficult emotions. in relation to them and you then answered we are not worried margarita russia donbass we will not leave donbass you said and now there are not so many people, thank god well, some number who say that they are ashamed. for the fact that they are russian, for the fact that they are from russia, you know, we were ashamed then, and now we are no longer ashamed, of course, it is hard and anxious and scary for us, not because of the

sanction, not because of this, everything is with this. i'm sure he can handle it too, because people are dying, but we're not ashamed anymore. i just wanted from on behalf of colleagues and on behalf of millions of people who share. it is such feelings to say thank you for it. you see people really share. i didn't ask them to clap. thank you very much. now now the question. yes, what to be afraid of. you probably know what most people in our country are afraid of now in connection with this. this is the same thing. what people are afraid of in the liberated classrooms , people are afraid that we will leave, we will not leave. so, after all, first of all, the first part of what you said, say that some people

they say that they are ashamed of the fact that they are from russia, you know, it is a shame for those who do not link their fate and their lives, the fate of their children with our country, they are not just ashamed. they just simply do not want them to have problems in those regions where they want to live and want something to bring up there and their children live. this is how people are, but a thinking person who binds his fate and the fate of his family. e with russia with the russian federation e he may be alarming about current events, but he is certainly in his heart in his heart, of course, interested in the growth of the power of russia in that she becomes stronger, more confident in herself, becomes more sovereign , looked confidently into the future, but it

cannot be otherwise for a person who wants to live here children, that's what it's about, therefore, ashamed there is not ashamed. these are other categories, but it means, uh, about what's going on. well, uh, look, fighting is always a tragedy. well, it's just forced actions on our part are inevitably forced. here's the thing, us just dragged to this line. i have to remind how it all came together, but uh, listen, whatever the pro-western governments. eh, in ukraine it is possible to work with everyone normally. here, mr. yunshchenko was tymoshenko. they were absolutely pro-western oriented. the same. uh, the so -called civilizational choice of some sort . sorry for the monotony, nafig, civilizational choice. they stole money from the ukrainian people, hid it in banks and want to protect it. here is the best way to protect yourself by saying that these are civilizational civilizational civilizational choice on e.

so they started to pursue an anti-russian policy in the hope that whatever they did , uh, the money would be protected there. well , it happens, of course, what they do. it all means that they get away with everything. this is the whole point of this civilizational choice. so, e. for some reason why was it necessary in 2014 to carry out a coup d'état in ukraine , everything has already begun. well, three foreign ministers from three european countries arrived. uh, germany uh, france and poland uh, were present as guarantors of agreements between the presidents and the opposition i got a call from president obama let 's do it. so everything calmed down. let's say that a coup d'état was carried out a day later, when you ask. and why after all so, uh, this opposition came to power in a democratic way. go to the polls and win. no , for some reason it was necessary to make the boss of the first.

moreover, bloody started it all now they say, well, let's talk about it and let's not remember it, we will always remember it, because this is the reason and the reason is those people who contributed to this revolution. what did the guarantors have to do, who signed a paper of agreement between, uh, president yanukovych and the opposition, carried out a coup d'etat, they guaranteed the mines the peace process, what they had to do should have come and said, no, it won't work. guys come on. let's get back to the political normal process. go to the polls. and that's it. no, they started handing out pies there on the site. support this revolution. why is this from here please events in the crimea no, they did not want to respect. please, the first first sanctions against russia were carried out twice thrice, large-scale military operations in the donbas for 8 years.

they were shooting at people. no one notices anything. the kiev authorities refused to comply with these minsk agreements, which is also normal. for someone it turned out, well, they summed it up to the current situation. here's what happened. in addition, they began to create such an anti-russian foothold in ukraine. come on, try it, we'll start creating. uh, anti-american foothold somewhere out there on state borders in mexico well, you know, for some reason, it would never even occur to anyone to do something like that. uh, in uh, in america, at one time we even removed our military bases. you see, no one even looks at this, doesn’t want to look, that means, and they create such threats for us. 100 times a thousand times said, let's negotiate, no. why such a position where did

such a dismissive attitude towards everyone, including us , come from? everything grew after the collapse of the soviet union. this is clear. so, but as to how we will do. i already uh what are we going to do? well, of course, we will protect the interests of those people for whose sake our guys are fighting there today, uh. uh, get egyptically injured. well, of course it's the same. uh, it’s just impossible in another way, and for what then these fatties, of course, we would support the people who live in these territories, but in the end, only the people who live there will depend on the future, and we will be with respect any choice they make. how do you know for sure? and this is a special operation in an

amazing way for normal people in the expected way, but for those people who are ashamed and even more so for their sponsors and inspirers, it unexpectedly rallied our society. you probably, maybe, you are being informed about the numbers of support for the special operation and the trust that you personally have risen now, well, there is such a movement to help, humanitarian aid and let's help the troops of the dpr lpr and ask, what if our armies need something and just shelter someone for people, moscow near moscow, moscow region with trucks. they just carry there what people and not only collect, and other regions also send military correspondents there from a copter, then i don’t know the mittens. if they know that someone, somewhere , someone in the battalion needed to look at it, of course. well, it's amazing we haven't seen anything like this. we only

read such things in books about heroic deeds and about the cohesion of our society in difficult times for our country. however, sometimes, however one gets the feeling, especially in moscow, that we are living in the finale of the bernard show house, where hearts are broken, where they are there for the whole play, chatting, discussing some kind of crappy family, and then at the very end of retirement , literally at the last minute bombs. with her were flying first suddenly happened. and in moscow and not in moscow, and even more so in the west, they are increasingly saying that, well, they just pronounce even this phrase, nuclear war. world war iii, we understand that to put it mildly , this is not the first, not the second and not the third the special operation is not ours, but in general in the world in just recent years, our so-called partners have been conducting special operations and waging wars, where they want for any reason and the devil, and no one said something about the situation in libya or somewhere back in afghanistan in syria

should lead to a third world war, and now they say, here, do you think this is generally acceptable rhetoric. does she have a basis or is it just like that, well, to chat, the louder, the better to hear, sort of. of course we hear the rhetoric of this image. where does this kind of thing come from? of these, their own statements, then one irresponsible policy will blurt out something, then another. moreover, at a high-level scientific level, let's say the ministry of foreign affairs of the first person, there e rant about what it is? well, therefore, to the occasion, but we will still be silent, we will respond accordingly, as soon as we answered, they immediately cling to this , here is russia in the garage. why we are not in the garage, but everyone should know what we have and what we will use if necessary for protection. our sovereignty, these are obvious things. the special operations that you mentioned, yes, we are. what kind of special operations there were full-scale wars

unleashed, of course, they practically destroyed iraq, which means that libya still cannot restore its statehood. uh, how many fought in afghanistan? how many years? well, it's not even shameful. the fact is that in the end they left, it must be said ingloriously, of course they left. well, that's not even the point. eh, the fact is that e , too, was still developing, the way we wanted. they are as needed. e in many cases, let's say, with regard to yugoslavia, yes. e dismemberment. yes, now, of course, after our country has crouched down existence. ah, there are new countries. there were many new interests. internal contradictions, of course, this is all an obvious thing. but e contributes to the development of these contradictions, and

then they began to e, split kosovo from serbia, and so on. hmm, it's also not very clear what e means for, as far as our actions are concerned. uh, by the way, speaking, uh, here's the legal side of this thing fully complies with international law completely. uh, when the same thing happened, kosovo uh was separated, because under the pressure of western countries, the international court. he decided that, in accordance with the un joint a, when a territory is separated from the state , ask permission on this matter from the central authorities. no need. this is the decision of the international court of justice give kosovo, but it is of a general nature. this is a precedent. well , well, well then, the republic of donbass should not ask permission from kiev authorities, they declared their independence in this regard, we could have the right to recognize them or not, of course, we did that, we

concluded an agreement with them, and we provide them mutual assistance in accordance with this agreement, as well as article 51 of the un charter military assistance had the right to have in full accordance with the joints whether someone likes it or not, they themselves created a precedent, therefore our actions are absolute legitimate. uh, let's say uh, the start of the action war in uh. b. the same they are not like that in iraq, because no one called me there, there were no agreements with anyone, including there was no recognition. uh, some newly formed state structures. they just bombed the country, they did the same thing in libya . and why? but because they believe that , as i said, uh, they have appointed themselves representatives of the lord god on earth now we hear uh, it means behavior or life

according to the rules, according to what rules, who invented them? and what kind of nonsense is there only one rule that must be observed. this is uh it is public international law. what is it? these are agreements between countries that are some kind of compromise, and which are signed by the respective states. and if someone came up with these rules for himself in order to impose them on other countries, then they will never work. this is a completely obvious thing . here we proceed from the fact that sooner or later, the sooner, the better the entire international community will return to the understanding that one must live not by some rules invented by someone, but within the framework of international law here. we are ready to work in this key . i understand that the question is not an easy question

; it can be answered in different ways, but, all the same, i cannot help but ask you about your view of our special operation on its inevitability, as we believe here and on its legitimacy. well, in general, what do you think, what do people in kazakhstan think about this? uh, there are different opinions, so about i will say frankly, uh, we have an open society, and the maturity of civil society is on the face, so different opinions are expressed, but i would like to note the next thing is modern international law. this is the charter of the organization in modern times. present times have come into conflict with each other. this is the territorial integrity of the state and over the

right to self-determination. here , the co-founders of the organization, apparently, did not take this moment into account at one time, and perhaps on purpose, if, as a compromise, two principles that now contradict each other and, of course. if soon they contradict each other, then there are different understandings. some say that the territorial the integrity of the state. this is a holy concept, a holy category, while others argue that any peoples secede of their own free will.

more than 500 or 600 states will emerge on earth. of course it will be chaos. for this reason, we do not recognize either taiwan or kosovo, south abkhazia, or south ossetia abkhazia, and apparently this principle will be applied in relation to the vase of state territories, which in our opinion is lugansk donetsk, this is a frank answer to your frank question. yes. thank you very much for this frankness. before i came here, i asked my subscribers on social networks what they would like to ask you and by a wide margin won two theses, one question the other

, wishes from subscribers for health, strength and , in general, all the best. it was in the first place among the questions that they would like to ask you, and in the second place is the question that it is impossible not to ask. see every day. girls gave birth to our guys. they were filmed, then, as they were in the basement, they gave birth by cesarean, they hit the market. uh, and people ask. here we are for them this, of course, we beat hands. is it time to hit them in the jaw, and what do you mean specifically when you talk about that red line, after which the blows to the decision-making center will begin, namely, we consider them to be a blow to the jaw, as i understand it. well look we're talking about running a special

military operation, uh, and uh. even with this special military operation. we must not those uh cities and towns that we liberate turn the semblance of stalingrad into a natural thing, which our military thinks at uh, organization of hostilities. e. this is the first second thing. uh, these absolutely senseless attacks on the elderly, and on the quarters of donetsk, are due to the fact that the line of demarcation, which was created 8 years ago. she, of course, is such a serious fortified area. and uh, there is a war on this in this direction. ah, the locals. this means the corps formed from the inhabitants of donetsk and, accordingly, there, uh, a little very well, excellent, but uh, to storm these

fortified areas. this is according to the military specialists, despite these strikes on the city itself, it is not advisable, because it will lead to heavy casualties from the attacking forces, and therefore, uh, there is a different tactic. as you can see, this can be seen from the map , the media are on fire about this, in fact, systematic work is underway. eh, on the way to the rear. this e fortified area. this, of course, takes some time. counter battery, the fight is going on there, and it will certainly increase the advantages. uh, in the artillery we are very large it will be inevitable. here but a as for those red lines right here. hmm uh, let me keep that to myself, because uh, that would mean uh enough from our side. uh, tough actions by name by topic. uh, the decision center, which i have already mentioned and which you mentioned, but uh,

but uh, still this is the area, uh, that should remain. uh, on the decision, first of all, the military-political leadership of the country, and , uh, those people who deserve appropriate action. eh, of such a level on our part, of course, er, we must, first of all, draw a conclusion for ourselves. uh, with. what can they face? if you act here, uh, cross these lines and lines, and hmm strikes on residential areas. this is definitely a crime. e is against humanity. these are humanitarian humanitarian problems, but i'm sure it will be solved.

it suddenly turned out that the russian language, russian culture, russian history. this is a huge threat to ukraine in the society that has developed very quickly, what with these people of the donetsk lugansk region. halley shot at us, for these

snipers to tell zelensky about they didn’t want to decide to destroy us, where were the positions nazis burned down at home there, because they literally worked from apartment to apartment. they fired at us, as he said. we will leave the ruin of mariupol, and so it happened. we are the same people. he also decided. we have decided not to recognize you because you are criminals. an entrepreneur could simply do his job ; the government introduced a moratorium on scheduled and unscheduled business inspections throughout russia in case of its violation. leave a complaint on the public service portal and get an answer within 24 hours, kostomuksha is one of the brightest soviet-finnish projects, the city began, in the end of the seventies economic cooperation with the russian federation is not the last factor that post-war finland

has become one of the most highly developed countries and cooperation in general. the mood is fitness, no matter how they all approve that nato has gathered in finland so frighten the population of a neighboring country. people. just don't cross borders, that's what it says. yes, no, yes, i have no more foot, and others say, as soon as the vernissa is opened, i will be the first to cross it. here we were informed just yesterday that ukraine seems to be would be urgently going to accept in the eu three european leaders visited kiev and there they were frightened by sirens.