many of our entrepreneurs, in any case, according to the laws, took their capital abroad, they were robbed there. now you understand, therefore, the conclusion of what investment is necessary at home in your native country, and our task is to ensure the security of these positions. this is how we will do businessmen who have seen things that they have not seen in recent months. throughout life, working philosophical women have been set up good, because there is no outside of it. nothing even, unfortunately, about her, so we live if we have a military operation, then here we are definitely at war in the financial sun, because what western states are doing today in relation to our banking sector. this is a war and parts, as if the war is a disconnect from swift, but the fight was not won exactly on the day of the elimination from the elevator. we didn't notice and that's why inside the country created absolutely effective much more modern. alternatives, yes, the west

is trying to hit the sick, because russia has been buying new boeings and airbuses for so long, and now these companies have denied service, but this is not quite unexpectedly, for example, we never advertised this to aeroflot 4,500 engineers. this is a very large number, we can simultaneously repair up to 20 aircraft. a group of elangs from 2,000, engineers working in this field, foreign aircraft in russia, their latest resources are still large. but a in a few years, serial production of russian liners will begin, the production of 72 ms-21e aircraft per year, at least 20 superjet 100 n aircraft of a purely domestic aircraft. but in what the west has definitely succeeded in the word in general prints, thoroughly undermined undermined. unfortunately, our partners in the west, the united states believed so much in its exclusivity that they declared themselves to be the messengers of the lord on earth. what only? the inexorable nature of the changes argued and it is

foolish to hope that everything will not be the same as before , because freedom and values ​​​​and the whole world saw it turned out to be a screen. click everyone who pulled me out of this horror with these commercials , something appeared behind the wall. that's the way it is, in fact, you see. now i see yevgeny. yes, yevgeny came to see me in prison. now i saw him today. i say, this is zhenya, you and i will see here, you understand, it’s just happiness for me that people fought for me, and our and even our ordinary compatriot citizens for me. here it really is anyway. who was, in fact, who is usually a citizen of lyosha who is a stage around the world? well, what we americans have done, you know, we have done, violating everything possible. today, of course, i did not say that these were tortures, very brutal tortures, serious broken bones, all things. here are the facts you know, the facts and the americans, you know, this is their lie. here is the propaganda machine. she is spinning, and so are these russophobic wildest moods that are happening there now. i joked

completely on myself, and their democracy there. there human rights - that's all i sat on on a person in my own skin, to who they are. i would just organize them slavs. we are third class people for them. it's like when i don't know how to tell you, like the nazis have the nazis, and they work for our mothers. well, not to drive us all i know, there are some taking some wild frames there. i do not know and completely break our side of a gigantic country with a huge history, and all its citizens. like they tried. erase, cancel at the entrance goes everything even the sport of the olympic movement a ban on the culture of masterpieces of art. i didn’t think that they would live this moment, it’s completely copied today, all these olympic charters can be thrown away, and in the trash spectators who want bread, a spectacle and stars need stars. see, and the stars now, they're all in this room tonight at this time. the european championship is going on, as if they are not just

performing for themselves, but when we performed directly, well, it was azar, i really liked everyone. big sport without russians. this, probably, is not for us to ask, and those who will not have big sports without russians are different. those who could not win will start to win. all very simply calls it stupidity. this is not enough pyotr tchaikovsky died in 1893 , how can this affect what happens in 2022. it's a mystery to me and i don't even read anything that someone said, maybe, uh, there someone is commenting on mine. what is my behavior at the remote control? okay, so he's not talking about a concert or a play at the console. how does he know they were required to be ashamed of the fact that they are russians are ashamed of those who do not link their fate and their lives, the fate of their children with our country. they are just ashamed. they simply do not want them to

have problems in those regions where they want to live and want their children to be brought up and live there, and a thinking person who binds his fate and the fate of his family. with russia he can anxiety refers to ongoing events, but he is certainly in his soul in his heart, of course, interested in the growth of russia's power in making her become stronger and more confident in herself, looking confidently into the future, but it cannot be otherwise for a person who wants to, to live here to drive, that's what it's about, therefore, uh, it's not a shame there. these are other categories by the american tv channel. of course, i wanted to talk about the failure of the forum, but it is unlikely that i can ignore the words of the head of china about the growth in trade with russia following the results year, you can count on new records. this

testifies to the high resistance to stress and the internal potential of chinese-russian cooperation. but this does not mean at all that china should play along with us or accompany us in everything, just as we do not need this, and the chinese leadership, just as we do, primarily proceeds from its national interests, but they do not conflict with each other. that's the thing. if any questions arise, then the nature and quality of state relations allows us to always find solutions. we started building not in connection with recent events , events in recent years or months. we have done and are doing this, because in asia, in china , the creation of new world development centers was clearly indicated. you all understand it all see and know. they are absolute leaders and the multipolarity of the world is inevitable. and those who cling to their imaginary global leadership. by all means, make a colossal mistake, a mistake that will cost them dearly. i don't have any doubt. this is no threat. it’s just that in fact this will happen to your country,

for sure, it puts pressure on you personally, it certainly puts pressure on secondary sanctions, threatens and so on. i would not say that there is direct pressure on our country, but sanctions exist, and we take these sanctions into account unconditionally we take it into account, but at the same time there are obligations related to our previous agreements with the russian federation, you mentioned pressure from outside. well, no matter who from the side did not press it is impossible to cancel, 24 billion dollars of turnover last year, and for the first 4 months more than 12 billion. if you do that, it will move on. calculate how much it will be, but it cannot be canceled under any pressure. it depends on it. uh, hundreds of thousands of jobs are a problem being created, but uh, they will certainly be overcome. if there is a will, we have such a will with kazakhstan. here. i want this to be clear and kazakhstan is our ally in the direct and broadest sense of the word

in today's conditions for obvious reasons. this, the more important meeting created all the conditions for frank communication. after the open part, the leaders moved here for a face-to-face conversation, however, in the public part of the forum, the president was as frank as possible. we don't recognize. not taiwan, not kosovo, not south ossetia, abkhazia, and apparently, this principle will be applied in relation to the phase of state territories, which , in our opinion, is lugansk donetsk russia kazakhstan has been connected for 30 years of mutually respectful dialogue in the new realities after the collapse of the soviet the union's allied relations with kazakhstan can be said to be fraternal. well, who in russia can think of spoiling relations with kazakhstan on any issues whatsoever. well, you understand this is nonsense, we are interested in strengthening such relations, the same would be with ukraine, but absolutely there would be no problems, by the way, even in crimea, because if

the failures of the people who live there, the russian-speaking population, were respected. they would respect the russian language culture, but it never occurred to anyone, you know? they are everything they did it with their own hands, this is nationalism, which , by the way, is the party of bonzes e in the council time is there lilies or blasphemy, right? he eventually began to gain momentum after gaining sovereignty. it is every day every day, despite our massive support, nationalism grew, grew, grew. why, for the sake of what, it’s not clear because of some ambitions of some group of people, you know, some subsequent bandera there, well, these are all, if we had normal relations, nothing like that tragedy. today would not exist. i assure you, russia has always tried to build these normal relations. even when it was hard and russia itself was in a difficult situation in the nineties, nevertheless, we constantly

helped and helped them with loans and cheap energy supplies from decades to decades, to be honest, by and large, i don’t even really understand what you could have done more. no. this is a group of people who actually seized political power and determined development vector. and then he announced some kind of civilizational choice, i repeat. in my opinion , only to forgive me, quite already in the yard language. i will say that they keep their grandmothers in foreign banks so that no one touches them. that's just for the sake of which now they have already reached the introduction of a visa regime between the closest peoples , another savagery to say differently. in recent years, because the dpr and the lpr have definitively taken the mainstream, and the west, with its games with international law, has given them every reason to have legal recognition or no, of course, we did it, we concluded an agreement with them, and mutual assistance and in accordance with

this agreement, as well as with article 51 of the charter, we provide them with military assistance had the right to have in full accordance with the joints like it to someone or they didn’t like it themselves, they created a precedent, therefore our actions are absolute and legitimate, but let’s say the beginning of the war actions in the same iraq are not like that, because no one called anyone there , there were no agreements with anyone they just bombed the country, they did the same in libya . and why a, because they appointed themselves representatives of the lord god on the land of russia, she did not appoint herself anywhere on her historical land. we return our own, but historical yes, of course, here. everything on the black sea let's say we don't actually claim all this there, but nonetheless. this is a fact of novorossi, where did it come from as a result of several wars with the turkish uh empire. well, no matter what kind of ukraine and here ukraine ukraine came to the russian empire with three

territories, in fact, kiev kiev region zhytomyr chernigov donbass, from the beginning they decided that it would be part of the rsfsr and then, as laziness said, it was necessary to cross over and transferred to ukraine in order to raise the percentage of the proletarian population in ukraine , this is how it was formed, well, it was formed, okay, we agreed with this and treated everything with respect, there was no reciprocal respect for russia or even for our own citizens. well , of course, we will protect the interests of those people, for the sake of which our guys. there are fighting today get injured. egypt. it's just impossible to do it any other way, but what are these sacrifices for? of course, we will support people who in these territories will certainly solve all the tasks of the special military operation. and the key to this courage and the heroism of our soldiers is the consolidation of russian society. whose support gives strength and

confidence to the russian army and navy the reaction of the deputy prime minister in charge of the defense industry to the western statement that russia is running out of missiles? let them talk, let them talk, we will rejoice. let them tell me that they tell me that we should be rounding up with you. i am the boss. yes on that day, many plans had to be adjusted on the go. a large-scale rotaka to the electronic forum system a longer plenary session several bilateral meetings, a foreign colleague was waiting for putin but there was also a big conversation with the editors-in-chief at 11:00 pm. putin went to the journalists and offered to meet again for a full-scale conversation, but he could not help talking right now with two war correspondents. they are back to the front to defend and in the information field. russia's independence, only such countries will set the tone in the future

, namely stronger sovereign states. russia is entering the coming era as a powerful sovereign country and we will become even stronger. this week has certainly been a very busy one. and what is planned for the president next week will be a lot of bright? we feel the best of the best today next week putin will meet with graduates of higher military educational institutions the event is traditional, but in today's circumstances a conversation with those who have dedicated their lives to defense the motherland is important, especially the great honor. on thursday , friday, the president will participate in the brix summit by telebridge, another confirmation that the world has finally and irrevocably become a multipolar and aggressive threat. the west is far from

making an impression on everyone. also next week, a meeting of the presidium of the state council on housing and communal services, the main topic is clear after putin's speech at the st. petersburg forum to launch a comprehensive program for the modernization of housing and communal services and , of course, on june 22 will lay flowers at the tomb of the unknown soldier. thank you. pavel i say goodbye to you for a week with the audience we will meet after a short pause in the studio on sunday evening.

for some reason, putin's glory at the st. petersburg economic forum at the end of the era of a unipolar world order impressed the european american media , in my opinion, vladimir vladimirovich has been talking about this, well, for the last 15 years that's right, but europeans are americans every time like how really how what happened? as again, they are generally, of course, strange guys, although on the other hand. i think that if someone wants to understand what the modern western media is, they need to read the notorious work of lenin and the proletarian literature there is something. that is, they are such a wheel of a cog, however, not a common proletarian frankly bourgeois affair. i can’t say any freedom there for a long time, especially after some other nonentity from britain made a decision, and the extradition, well, almost to the death penalty for terrible torment, of the great m-m journalist, that is, absolutely, that is, such an icon, if you like, of a free journalist of our day, she is.

for margarita, you were simply a personal and human tragedy, because margarita knows julian asan well and he collaborated with russia for some period of time, where he was an employee of artie. but he made one mistake of his life to the wrong one, he believed the embassy. this is the only mistake he made in his life. well, in any case, the west is simply not going to give up its positions ready. now to literally fight for them, the head of the british armed forces sandoras wants to create an army capable of defeating russia, but it is obvious that britain itself will not succeed under any circumstances. there is now the smallest army in the last 300 years - 73,000 people. well, as often happens, the british usually shout loudly, but from behind, that is, in such a way as to get out to fight themselves. well, you know, not in the battle of waterloo , that is, none of them are particularly striving anymore, therefore britain is already leading at all.

retreating to the epoch, it is not winston churchill about his miserable shaggy parody, and therefore it is not the iron ladies that are knocking at the back, but her weak ones. yes parodies in a shaggy hat, let's say, because it was in it or a rhinestone that she arranged a photo shoot. although it was quite hot, nevertheless, on red square, they are all somehow comical, but as we know, the clowns do not become less bloody from this. we have, for example, ukraine, when the clown is obviously the embodiment of all the fears of american children and the works of stephen kingley are embodied in reality. and this is absolutely clown evil. now makes ukraine cry tears of blood. and he is so cheerful boys meet western leaders who for some reason come to him are still wearing ties. it is necessary for everyone then in t-shirts to carry early to meet. of

course, aidan was surprised not only by the fact that why you put me on a bicycle. but he fell off it because he forgot that he was on a bicycle, as he himself explained, he was updated, he never rode no, no, but that's the point, he stopped and fell because he forgot that he was on a bicycle that you need to take your foot off the pedal, and he said, honestly forgot, after which this happened, but it should be noted that he is very good physical shape for his age. what can not be said about his mental form, well, sometimes i forgot i forgot, fortunately i didn’t crash. didn't break anything. wherein. he even demonstrated that nothing broke or crashed, realizing, as the forest of mercury wisely noted, wisdom, who does not jump, that muscovites. for some reason, leaving the church, he decided to jump to the question. how if you feel? fools, of course, not utter, but in principle, yes, and i want to ask you right away. now it has appeared. this is very dirty stuff. uh,

biden's family history of relationship with his daughter. let's not discuss it. here, let's just not be like american journalism. eh, this terrible dirt. i think that this is not a topic for our discussion. that is, we will not fall to the level of the yellow american press. that is, we already know everything about them, that is, we have no doubts, but such a terrible dirt that has now gone in the american media, i don’t even want it to somehow come up. here, whoever needs it will find a source to look at, but i don’t want to at this level is to discuss these family squabbles. this is out of the focus of attention. another important thing is that baytman believes that anti-russian sanctions are the best choice for the united states, and then he said a phrase that dmitry anatolyevich greatly surprised . to which medvedev said that, in fact, such a bifurcation in one person

is known, what is the name, that is, it is a disease, and i immediately remembered, when the berlag was pulled out, that he did it not in the interests, though in the interests of truth. that is, you decide, but in any case, biden still has time to deal with himself before the big november defeat of his party, and stoltenberg declared russia a little bit of a threat and peace and also called the challenge to the west not some territorial claims, but the rise itself, china so we are a threat to the world. well, of course, that is, nato is a peace-loving bloc, and we are a threat to the world. well , it's always interesting how it all begins. now everyone will see the producers of good things.

they will no longer hide what values ​​and rights they protect, and it is obvious that this is the only own dominance. it is not for nothing that xi jinping called western-style democracy the causes of wars and world upheavals and now western politics in the name of democracy, they are calling to prepare for a long war

with russia, but do not be offended by almost my already, but i would like to start a conversation with margarine, because first of all, well, i d was nearby. that is, i watched, i was inside, and then we had a meeting with the president of the russian federation at night, it so happened that, well, margarita took longer, well, we all the rest watched the president for for a certain amount of time, westerners and everyone else shouted that putin was sick. but i will tell you this. if you find me at least one person with at least some kind of disease that can work and keep it that way. here is the concentration of attention i would accurately formulate to be in such an ideal physical condition for such a number of hours. you of course. i was very surprised to notice how, after putin's speech, all the talk about well-being disappeared somewhere. everything

dissolved at once, it became clear that it made me laugh, of course, how we are our western colleagues some too. well, they are not very smart there, but putin speaks about the economy, and as mark twain said, the rumors about my death are greatly exaggerated. headlines immediately go out. rumors about my death are greatly exaggerated. putin that is, this is what distinguishes our kind of liberal scum from all the others, that is, but they do what they want, they don’t need any news at all, it’s enough to say the alphabet. they themselves will cut everything as they like margaritina. firstly, why congratulate you respect, because well, for our workshop, that is, for journalists this kind of work, this is the olympic games gold medal for everyone, well, this is objective, because the

number of people in the world who had the opportunity to speak for the president, especially in such a stressful environment, when all kinds of people are sitting and looking at you and when you are nearby. uh, the leader of kazakhstan and keep the concentration of attention, that is, the person, of course, was not just like you feel directly, because there was still a conversation, as i understand it. some communication before and after. come on, we're interested. i certainly don't i can tell everything publicly, then i ’ll tell you in your ear, which made me very happy. just very pleased. i haven't seen the president. first special operations never. so, i just saw it on tv. yes, and before that, when the wave came to valdai, in my opinion, there was an event. well, it's been six months already. and, of course, i was struck in the good sense of the word by his form. he was unbelievable,

sure very calm and in a very good mood. here, what is surprising, yes, that is, now we already have it so accepted. everyone has yes, whom i will not meet. asking how are you? well the current circumstances. well, slowly well, nothing, well , somehow with god's help. yes, the man is in a very good mood. there is a person in such a mood when he does not have inner anxiety and anxiety, but tomorrow. that is, this indicates that he is sure that in what he does, firstly, he is confident in the rules of nastya 's decisions, and secondly, he is sure of the correctness. and hmm, how these decisions are implemented and how everything flows, and in unconditional unconditional correctness. of what should happen, what to when it comes and physically, he was very awake. listen, we had this event. yes, it was almost 4 hours. i was squeezed like a

lemon after it. i just wanted to go to the street to take a breath of fresh air, drink a glass of wine there, and then we had an event the night before, and between these events and our meeting, all this time there were meetings after our meeting. well, there were a few more meetings. moreover, this meeting, which is known for sure. yes, this is a formal event. not just how we are sat down with colleagues for a glass of drank and entered another event. this is what kind of tone you need to maintain both physically and morally, and what kind? uh, the spirit puff up the spirit. yes, this mood and such benevolence, directly obvious benevolence, because there were times and there were moments when we saw our president very strict. ah, so collected the alarms almost go. yes, i didn't notice it at all. when we were walking, i

asked him, vladimir vladimirovich there, what we wanted to talk about, in what tone like that. eh me just interested in your opinion. how do you see this discussion. he said, he says, i don't care, and so friendly. i don't mean it doesn't matter. and so with the fact that yes, whatever. i have the answers to all questions with the certainty of being right, because he can not, uh, be taken by surprise or put an uncomfortable position in any questions. i really asked you the questions i wanted to. well, those that had time, of course, you could ask more, but the most important thing, it seems to me, we asked and it seemed to me very important. ask questions people ask. we know what they are talking about, people people on the street people in the kitchen people. uh, ordinary so-called citizens. we are all ordinary citizens. well, there is such a category that is accepted on the air to call the common people. i don't like it very much. it seems to me that it sounds like a scribble. nevertheless, it is not the expert community, not the ministers. not those who are responsible for making decisions

, their implementation, but the people who are affected by all these decisions. i even launched a poll before going live and asked my subscribers what they you asked in my place, and two theses won by a huge margin. yes, the first subscribers. they just asked me to convey wishes to him. this is good health, courage and patience and to convey that here we are, vladimir vladimirovich and the most important question was, when will they stop swindling around donetsk. when will we hit the decision-making center, which has already been said many times. and what he answered. we then discussed putin with friends and colleagues. naturally, more than once someone agrees, someone does not agree. i am i would like to share, here with you colleagues and with the audience, as i understand it, and maybe hear the rights or wrongs in the way i understand it. this is how i understand it. there are points where the nazis have barricaded themselves and from there they shy away, but in our liberated peaceful cities,

there are three ways out of this situation in donetsk and so on . the first to zarashashit these points with carpet fire. well, there, too, our people are against it, except for these nazis. these people they're holding hostage, they're hiding behind, sitting in these schools, sitting in high-rise buildings there in civilian infrastructure. so what, uh, citizens are dying in donetsk. we must now kill 10 or 20 or 100 times more citizens because of the fact that these nazis provoke us to do this. they get it. the bottom line is, what's the point. we protect equally those people who are in the already liberated territories and those people who are in the territories that have not yet been liberated. these are also our people. why are we ourselves going to roll heavy artillery simply, because for 10 peaceful there is one nazi who shirks from there. this is how i understood it, maybe the second way is wrong. then a huge number of

our military, also our guys, will lie down to storm, and this has already happened. and in this special operation and before in different places, it happened like that. is this correct, but it will be faster, right? it will be faster, well, what kind of victims and the third way, how did the sozov begin to surround them to block supply opportunities, sooner or later they will give up. yes , it will be longer, yes, we will have to put up with this news every day, which was given at five the market was again hit in the center of the city or in some village. we have the bryansk region or in the belgorod region. it’s terrible for all of us to hear this, it ’s terrible, and rabies just boils in my woman, but in my chest, when, here, i hear it every time and every time i also want to say. well, why don't we fuck them, but in the end. i actually, so i asked this question, how are the children red lines, when are these red lines, when are these decision-making centers, eh? he said

exactly what the red lines are. of course i won't say but they understand very well, i will not say, based on military property. yes, why are we going to reveal all the cards to them in advance, but i want to remind you that exactly today it was the defense that announced that they hit somewhere near the dnieper exactly in the decision-making center where 50 died. as the ministry of defense tells us, of course, at the same time we congratulate igor konashenko. he is now a lieutenant general, but during the operation, what is already a week? well, of course, but we congratulate him for the first time. yes, that is, i had not shown him before with lieutenant generals shoulder straps. over the past day , sea-based high-precision long-range missiles of a caliber at 12:30 hit a command post of ukrainian troops near the village of shirokaya otchachka, dnepropetrovsk region, at a time when a

working meeting of khamanov, the composition of the operational-strategic group of troops of alexandria, was destroyed as a result of the strike. 50 generals and officers of the armed forces of ukraine, including the general staff command of the group, troops of air assault troops and formations operating in the nikolaev and zaporizhia directions well, there is a lot more there, but this is the track itself. well, it's a decision -making center. you know, in what sense, yes, 50 general officers in a centric, centurochek, yes, promptly. yes , it seems to me that it has also become clear that banks are strategic. if anything, we will answer, so they understand you well, returning to the first test. he said, well, what are we going to turn these cities into stalingrad well, really. well, there are our people, and these are our future cities. same it is obvious where all these nazis have now mastered. we are fighting for this, that the londons have turned about

our future. johnson talks about this, why they should prepare for war with us, because if putin is different, vladimir is different. i'm just like we have a series of these evil jokes, because doctor sosnovsky joked about the need to strike at germany because germany is already sending everything to ukraine and in germany all these days they constantly say no, don't worry russians don't hit. but if they strike now, let them not sleep in london. we completely sit down, because we have nothing more to fight with. well, in general, this land is ours and ours are people. and then we have to restore it, and then we were restored, including morally. yes, not only hmm at home, it is easy to restore. but uh, morale and attitudes. it is also important now to put hundreds and thousands there because they are exactly on us. these creatures provoke it exactly

on them in that they scurry around these villages or the market. there is no military need. no, where is this famous nato intelligence, which supposedly points them to the point. she really points them to them, really they don't care about these points. they are not hitting military targets. they are not beating in order to inflict some kind of military damage or damage on us, they are beating and precisely in order to undermine the morale of the people who are there people who are here precisely in order to increase it in our society. ? why don't we answer to support everything that happens in our society, and in society there, first of all, in the liberated territories it fell. let's not fall for their vile and really bloody tricks. let's proceed from the fact that, probably, we are no smarter than our own decision-making centers and, probably, the people who sit in these decision-making centers as a

perfect commander-in-chief at the head know what they are doing. let's not just be led by someone else's propaganda military propaganda is the first. second, i can say the same moment, well based on observations. there are recent hours that the president is open to information that comes from various levels, of course, that is, the decision-making center does not behave like the god of the olympians . that is, they just take information from everywhere and official sources, unofficial sources and military correspondents and people who are on places, which is very important, because we have seen, unfortunately, in the history of our state remembered the first chechen war. how many solutions were politely speaking, political versus what was proposed military what consequences this led to, therefore it should be noted that vladimir vladimirovich just doesn’t have such a thing that here we are at the top of god, olympians and you don’t tell us what and how to do. he

just listens very carefully to me, of course, the essence of our second meeting, about which you mentioned, that people there, first of all, dual-cores, convey some things to the president. which they consider important and it was his initiative to meet with everyone correctly, it's not us, uh, i don't know, surrounded the kremlin or the building petersburg forum. give us a meeting with putin of course not, that is, it is important for him. it is to hear not just to answer questions, but to hear some information. the video that was circulated yesterday , including in the swamp, or even primarily your channel in the telegram, in my opinion, i saw them there. they are , of course, two absolutely amazing videos that say everything about what the video is going on. the first captured is not captured the remaining sushnik. a bearded check is sitting, an absolutely russian face. that's completely russian. here you go, none of you will tell him who he is russian, of course , these blue eyes are so big, uh, fair-haired

guy, fair-haired beard and says, well, i was mobilized for mandatory mobilization. we must also understand. they are not all there willingly. it is obvious. we know clearly that there is a significant number of nazis and induction people with whom nothing can be done at all. only in fact, it’s really possible to shoot there according to the laws of the dpr. unfortunately, there are a certain number of people who have been deceived. and there is a certain number of people who, in general, just i’m here, who just sat there as a baker, or what kind of pastry chef he was at home in the village, he was mobilized, they threw him in the eye, they put one in the eye, they said he’s sitting, fight back with a machine gun in one trench, he covered his machine gun with a rag, covered his machine gun and sat waiting for 2 days until him will come to surrender him. and what did you give up there says, and why am i fighting for your sake i am fighting, then i thought, i'd better stay here. this is what i'm going back to. why is it? i don’t even care where he lives; he doesn’t have any of these

military-patriotic feelings that he defends his homeland. he understands perfectly well that he does not protect any motherland. he defends someone’s interests completely alien to him and he himself doesn’t care where to live in donetsk in belgorod or there his villages near kiev where he came from and the second video, how our guys scouts are there during the execution of some kind of intelligence operation, i don’t know anymore the details stumbled upon a large number of civilians and how they take them out, and here is a detailed and long way how they take them out of the shelling, and at that time they are being swayed by them, it seems, but yury is their own power. and so every time i see this, i understand how umnos is in terms of my own logic. europe and america entered when they cut down the artist and satellite and completely closed access both on the internet and everywhere to any of our activities, because people there would watch such videos, one, the second third. well, it would be very difficult to

continue to convince them that it was russia that attacked ukraine and that this is a war between russia and ukraine, because it is absolutely obvious to any person that this is not a war between russia and ukraine, it’s not even russian special operation against ukrainian troops. this is a civil war in ukraine in which that part of ukrainians who are russophobic and, let's say, anti-russian in the sense in which the nazis were anti-semites. yes, absolutely in this sense, she destroys another part of her own people, and russia simply takes the side of one of these belligerents. why on this side is obvious? why because this russian is our people, and there are anti-russians, that's all. and such an explanation would become very clear and obvious europeans to americans and the electoral prospects of their leaders who sell them this crazy rabid russia that drinks just fights for

territory, because it’s not enough for it and being the largest country in the world is not enough, we still had to grab a piece of mariupol for some reason. yes , people, you understand that this is not so their electoral prospects in general, would rush to zero. they are now striving for 30-20 there, but they would simply go to zero. and so they show, look, they have nowhere to go, but sooner or later. truth will prevail and all they will see that in the civil war in ukraine, russia is defending the side that, without provoking anything, caused fire on itself, and which has been destroyed for many years. colonel, i'm somehow more accustomed to address thoughtless regalia. we are preparing a very big war, because i see that britain has somehow become rude. poland for now well, let's say so in the voices of retirees, but he also says that it is necessary to cover western ukraine

with an air defense umbrella, that is, we are getting involved in a serious way, firstly, it has come you don't have to always be ready, because if you 're not ready, she'll catch you. uh, secondly, but you yourself told vladimir dolvich about this that the british are masters of verbal affairs, and lately. that's when you need to do something with your hands and head, then they have problems with this , they, in fact, throughout their history, have always pushed us, whoever the turks of the 19th century were. hitler from all over united europe in the 20th century, and now they are again trying to follow the same path. what is hope for? of the entire collective west, led by the united states of america and their british allies. they

understood what had passed. 3 months of special operation no one in russia runs through the streets, no screams, no ashes sprinkled on his head, no one comes out. body of power on the contrary, the people of russia rallied around their leader around the president and the supreme commander-in-chief today, the degree of confidence in the president goes off scale, of course, for them this is a surprise. it's bad, second. they all expected that in a week, in two, in three, in a month. first the calibers run out, then the people run out, then something else runs out, but it doesn’t end, well, they don’t run out, it flies and flies, it flies, it flies. so something needs to be done, but the goal is to wear out russia, the goal will

bleed russia, sanctions were carried out. they talk about it themselves. it's just that they used to talk about economic war attraction pressure. and now they are openly talking about the military component, so there is nothing surprising in this . and the fact that vladimirovich putin went to the forum here. showed himself to the whole world and that, how he did it. what margarita was talking about, this is a message to our people. what do you guys, do n't worry, in fact, everything is fine. everything is under control. we know what we're doing, we know where we're going. the goals of a special military operation will be achieved and fulfilled by the izologist; this serves the heroism of our military and the degree of confidence in our army of our people. that's all. therefore, everything is

developing normally there, and no matter what they do, no matter how they scream, so as not to be taken there, this will not change the situation. now as for the prisoners you you know. we probably underestimate one, in my opinion, very important component, because in fact there is no officer for a ukrainian soldier, this nazi is there from azov from aydar well, an ordinary military man, including in order to surrender to a blanket, it takes more than a dozen courage to go to us, and he understands that he will be safe here to feed him to drink, heal all the wounded to protect, in the end , but his family remains hostage to his children and parents. and what can these freaks

seeds do? we know well, therefore, when they make this decision worthy of respect, believe me. and we need to talk more about this too, because you remember there was a story when one of the mayors went over to our side, and his daughter was at that time somewhere in kiev, she was taken away from our forest and then sashintaged. what are they doing to their daughter? therefore, we must continue to work with the entire population of ukraine with the ukrainian army, a soldier with an officer, we explain that they really are not fighting for the wrong people, they are fighting and that their future is only as part of russia only together with russia only next to russia then. it will be a truly peaceful existence, because what is happening now is, again, nothing new. we have seen history with you. during the time of bohdan khmelnitsky, in the polish army of jeremiah vishnevsky there were entire regiments of ukrainian cossacks

, not poles, namely, ukrainians, and they slaughtered these zaporozhians with the same pleasure, hung them and burned them. therefore, i absolutely agree that this is a civil war, but not in russia, but in ukraine, a civil war of the ukrainian people with its enslavers. only not with the nobility that used to be, but with this modern elite of bandera, perverted for money and on the idea of ​​western capital of the united states of america and their closest allies, but our cause is true, the enemy will be defeated and victory will be in support of your words, before i go to advertising, i want to show, and one frenchman who is headed by an association for a long time and confidently fighting anti-semitism. and look what he says to ukraine, which suddenly decided to become a member of the family

european peoples. introduced a european family on an equal footing ukraine must return from its history, that is, from the glorification of those who collaborated with the nazis and killed tens of thousands of jews, to the street that leads to it is called stepan bandera , who is glorified in school and who killed tens of thousands of jews and collaborated with the nazis europe is economic legal values. but also morally, one cannot simultaneously commemorate the jews who were killed by the nazis by tens of thousands of ukrainians and praise those who killed the jews. this impossible. in this case, ukraine has no place in europe if it does not leave its history. here is

what he naively does not understand that ukraine is not going to listen to ukraine is going to impose ukraine in a position where he screams tell me why? and so let's see how quickly the europeans we get tired of it. although dmitry anatolyevich medvedev is burning here again. he said it will be where ukraine will enter. he also said, that is, will the european union be there at the moment when you want? also, he said, when there is someone next from the ukrainian madmen said that in august they were going to sit down at the negotiating table, it was said that there would be someone to sit down. so the question of the type has recently been scaring ukrainians very much with advertising. different eras we will have a child.

deceive you give love stories

we look at the history of russia in the application or on the website for free without registration.

well, it is clear that the world will never be the same, this split is quite obvious and we must already take this calmly, very funny, of course, hryvnia. sechin formulated it, i liked this biblical apocalyptic approach. we have complete confidence. uh, that all tasks will be completed. gotta do it before the flood. we will be glad to see our friends among the participants in the project to build a new ark for the global economy. what is there to do? i want to continue

margarita's thought about the form. i looked into my bell towers, as a political scientist, as a person who has been dealing with the problem all his life, the world order is the theory of sovereignty and, uh, putin when he speaks on a sort of current agenda, he is always forced to be a political philosopher in a good sense of the word, he always formulates some very powerful theoretical messages that relate to the world order of such basic issues of political existence, and in this sense. here is his performance. uh, this time on the forum it was no exception. and he really said a lot of important things. so you started with the fact that what is it, all of a sudden, the europeans cannot understand about this multipolar world, which has finally come. i want to stand up for them for the europeans. yes, that's

what happened. that's the point is that the world order is the world order, it either exists or it doesn't, it always disappears gradually, but once there comes that critical point when it really ceases to be what it was yesterday, after all, we are the collapse of the unipolar world, even in this studio we are talking. well, probably, i don't know, well, 10 years is for sure, but we remember the speech of our leader in munich about the same thing. we remember our special operation or then enforcement of peace against the tbilisi aggressors. these were all signals. we said this world does not suit us. he can't be, but the trouble is we were organic part of this unipolar world. we were

integrated into it. we lived by these rules, we have to admit it, because we were members. all these institutions. it starts with the council of europe, ending there somehow with an act, and in relations with nato, and we tried to play by these rules, we provided rebound airfields for american military personnel who carried out their special operation, and in afghanistan it is all part of this world. here is greater russia, a sixth of the land. she was built into this world. unfortunately, we are not liked it. we understood that this was hurting us, that it was violating it. you're right, it destroys our security, but we still have the wto. and so on and so forth. and there really is a cutoff, it is absolutely clear this is february. 22 years russia is a huge russia fell out. here one time in the morning at night fell out of this unipolar world. why because

the unipolar world assumes that this one pole has the ability to impose the rules of life on everyone else. in general, again, as a specialist who has been doing this for many years, i want to say there is no good or bad world order. they always exist as long as they suit most of the countries that they build. let me remind you that when there was a bipolar world , it means the usa ussr nato the warsaw pact, it was a complex world. it was a world built on the principle of dividing the church of influence, and when in the sixty- eighth year the warsaw pact troops entered czechoslovakia within the soviet bloc, in addition to international law, the principle of socialist

internationalism operates in accordance with which we are obliged to protect. uh, socialist institutions in all those countries that fall within our area of ​​responsibility. what happened after august of the sixty-eighth year, and in the sixty-ninth year. in the election in germany, willy's brother was elected chancellor. he created a left-liberal coalition, which proclaimed a new eastern policy and began a total rapprochement with a terrible nightmarish the soviet union created an economic system that still holds europe's gas in exchange for pipes. these are all ours, so to speak. here are today's economic systems that bind them were created then lexicon, i noticed that when you talked about wisdom or brant pointed at dr. sosnovsky and when the terrible soviet union at me. i agree. i agree with this, why am i saying this? and, because that system, for all its contradictions, then the world order, it suited most countries and

when it collapsed this system collapsed due to reasons, about which we also talked a lot in this. it was in this studio that the unipolar world appeared. i also want to remind all of us and we connected. whom the world also had certain hopes, it seemed to us that the scenario of this kind policeman is possible, who will judge everything, who is really the most powerful on earth, who has the strongest economy, who has the most powerful ability to influence everything and everything, and he will ensure everyone’s security, everyone’s normal conditions development, and the policeman turned out to be the main bandit, who, instead of pacifying any bandit who would encroach on the safety of another himself. first thief. the very first robber himself is the first destroyer of all modes. whatever is possible and so on. we were moving towards this multipolar world not because the development of human civilization is so objectively arranged. what did putin say because new centers of power are emerging asia

china and so on. this is indeed an objective process, but there is a second one. the most important thing is this world order does not ensure the safety of everyone else. in a special special operation in ukraine - this is in addition to the fact that i completely agree. this is ours, but a duty, if you want a historical duty, to be on the side of good in this civil war in ukraine, to be on the side of our people. these are our people, who are defending their rights there today, their primordial rights to the language, to the right to self-determination, by the way, there was a very interesting discussion about this issue. when such a said 'bout self-determined nations and compared this with the principle of integrity. i am not my authority, so to speak, but to discuss with the president is such to you, but as a political scientist i can say that i am sure that the principle of self-determination is proved by the whole human history. he always eventually makes his way when it

is truly the will of the nation of the people, there are no exceptions corrected if you would take me as an example of catalonia . maybe someday it will be different realized, but when the people set themselves the goal of self-determination, he always does it and there are no exceptions in history. and so, when e today we show on e, donetsk and lugansk and we say that this is a quasi-state. well, that's right. uh, a big politician to say that, but essentially from my point of view. this is an example of an absolutely real example of political self-determination. and one more very important thesis in this connection. here is the new world order, from which today objective russia is confirming the old one, and today it is will dictate. the approaches of the rules and principles of the new

world order, the essence of which is very simple, is to provide each participant in this world order with a sufficient level of protection of their own sovereignty and their own security. that's what we're fighting for today. that's why we are changing this world and i'm interested in this among the rhetorical questions. but lithuania, which seems to have announced yesterday in relation to russia, these sanctions related to blocking the transit blockade of kaliningrad, it acts as sovereign states. here if lithuania was a sovereign state today, and not, fortunately, a unipolis world. she would not have allowed herself such madness in her life. and how will we answer this, i will tell you about it now, although i do not make the decision. this is what hits the sovereignty of this state. if you imagine other rules, when behind lithuania's back is not

the european union that blinked at her, it's not worth it, washington. are you really small, lithuania could afford it. this is how to behave in relation to the russian state, violating signed agreements are all that is possible, because transit and i draw the attention of all those present . transit is also part of the issue of limiting between lithuania and russia if there is no free transit. this is a question of whether the border is between lithuania and russia so what is needed and what should be changed. and what were they afraid of from the sudaktsinsky, uh, sulat corridor? yes, but listen , this is from theory, it may well become practice. if this policy will continue. why is this everything is first third in fact de facto, lithuania is pushing the world. and as often happens. this is such another gavrila principle. that

is, a seemingly small person performed relatively local actions. he killed the archduke, terdinand, the first world war began, and now lithuania, by its actions, may well lead to the start of a full-scale third world war. i don't think we're going to go for it. although i'm sure we still have to lead then. i think we won't be fooled, they will tell us that then everything is possible, but now kaliningrad is attacking. i think that we are not let's behave. it is in this format that we will give a reason. uh, they did, and i think that u we need to find a fairly tough retaliatory measure in terms of our bilateral relations with the cast. for example, i'm still a supporter of the relationship. now i will explain, lithuania is of such a size that there are no relations there. no, uh, well, he'll show, for now. you see such a state on the political map of the world. here is the correct wording. so far, this state is on the

political map of the world, but we have control over the baltic, and we have approximately where we took control of the baldet military control. we have on the coast in ours, so we have, we have about 3 billion military presence in the baltic yes, but in military control, i would not say. i think that it is possible, but to declare a sanctioned liver of goods that lithuania sends by sea across the baltic sea to other suppliers and that are produced using products that are shipped from russia, we have the right to do this. i don't know whether such a decision of kaliningrad can be made, but this will hurt and seriously there many years ago, when close friends were not threatened there in the first place. up and from the special forces they say, you know, just don't be offended. but we

can’t protect you, we’re not imprisoned for that, but we’ll avenge you amazingly, but cover it with your body. we cannot do this differently. that's how it is here. we are trying to solve the problem of kaliningrad or to spoil lithuania. lithuania is nothing to us at all. we need to solve the kaliningrad problem. and if we now allow some one to violate our problems of kaliningrad, alikhanov will already decide about said this. well, yes, no, there will be a complicated sea of ​​\u200b \u200bmysticism, but all goods from russia will go, because finland, sweden will join nato in kaliningrad and they will break it. they were once turks and we will already have large restrictions on the passage across the baltic sea, that is, we will watch how they clamp down in our time or we will raise an eyebrow and say, so the time is 24 hours, you either cancel it or we break through the corridor 'cause every time they play with russia

special operation. in 10 days they are standing at the english channel. if they believe that we will dream of fathers, they must understand that this is a delusion . volodya i said about the corridor, it seems, or you didn’t hear. no, i just heard, but after that you also said, very dangerous. you said that the world order is not a category of good and evil. and this is a direct category of good and evil. the thirties was the nazi world order for europe, they said that it was not moral, that there was no concept, yes, good or bad no, so i confirm i want to say that he is alive until this or that order number, while he suits the majority today does not suit terrifying even when it suits the majority, for example, the nazi world order in europe suited the majority of the population about once they really liked to rob the jews, the gypsies of the communists, and they broke him it was broken, it was broken with the help of red, it was broken from the outside and inside, of course, and

today we are breaking it from the outside, and today we are breaking it, just as we broke it in the forty-fifth year, therefore, when we talk about good and about the category of good. it is too after all, the nazis have their own idea of ​​good very conditionally, it seems to them that for them good is the complete destruction of russia what are they talking about? and all western bastards happily fit into this narrative. they gladly want to see russia completely destroyed. lithuania, for example, would be happy that we were destroyed just for a holiday and belarus, including taking the territory. well, who is now dictating to nato, or now there are 40 million. well, there will be how many ukrainians there will be at that moment. let 10 there from the territory enter to europe and what will happen to europe that is, there, in general , it will all turn into an absolute anti-russian finally, crazy i will complete my thought. you will like it. my thought is that the world order that has developed after the destruction of the soviet union, it categorically

today only does not suit russia, fortunately, it still does not suit many others. by the way, here is the form of this showed. eh, who counted there? how many countries are there in xinjianping and e, these are just signals there that this world uncomfortable for the vast majority of today's citizens and most of humanity, if we take simply the population, and including and if we take economies such as india, such as china, and so on, thereby. i want to express the main idea. right there today, in ukraine, with the help of this special military operation. we are indeed solving an absolutely global task, an absolutely global task, and moreover, we no longer have the opportunity today to deviate from solving this task. we have left this world order. we destroyed it. he is no longer exists, and in the old vision we were left, that's the difference, we didn't leave it. what's the

difference. we would like to sit in it at any cost. i've been looking at the st. petersburg elite, the forum. come on, half of you is ready, half of the epic sit down and they said, can we not be so strong already gone. that's right said, or rather the general correctly today, why is the president's support going off scale? this deep russian normal is hinting at the same time. it’s even embarrassing for me to ask who vladimirovich is hinting at , listen to the panel discussions that took place. well it was just a series of such frank howls. let me go with those. who was in this discussion. i'm with the people like this, i want to finish. today, indeed, this cut-off point - this is the beginning of a new world order, where the dominant will become higher. again, returning to putin, sovereignty, you know how to protect sovereignty, then you are a participant in sovereignty, then deal with lithuania and tell the

european union if you cannot rebuild lithuania, there is no supply. uranium no gas supply no fertilizer supply. if we supply something we all go there, if this is not understood in a month. where you can see lamash, the belarusian city reminds us to vouch, but i join the assessments that our president has long made in the political sphere. this is wise. uh, i would like to focus on economic issues, which have been given a lot of time. and if we are talking today about what was said, i would support your words, which, of course, apparently due to natural modesty. uh, many speakers, including the financial and economic bloc, did not bring it up. e on panel discussions. uh, some big decisions waiting for the president to say it. well

, now he said. i hope that starting from monday we will begin to read that we have all begun to implement what was if not said, then at least indicated by the president. i stand on some things that in my opinion are fundamental. well, firstly, it was said about the new economic model. and it was said that the sovereignty of economic sovereignty is the guarantee of our well-being of our the present of our future, which is embedded in the concept of sovereignty, the president pointed out a lot of things in particular. we are an open economy perfectly, but this does not mean that we should not focus today on creating an independent economy, which is primarily understood as. completely, as he emphasized the full cycle of production personnel technological, and not partially. this means he is straight. e, gave a direct indication of the need to form such an economy as a product that will become a different goal and a different solution to our social

economic problems, referring to business. he openly said that it would be good now to revive a different attitude towards the income received by business in our country. not only are you on- the result of an investment. well, the activity that was carried out is called. what does it say that today the goal is not profit, but the development of our country. and this development should become a subject. not just theorizing, but already practical implementation. look, it was said that these should get away from templates. i see for myself that one of the characteristics of one of the characteristics is the debate plan or market. yes, not a plan or a market, but plans and a market. and if we are talking about the fact that the planned part appears as the basis for the strategic development of our country, then the market is just as much to whom the implementation of all this is addressed today, when we say the president that the discount rate said that the discount rate puts pressure on the economy is a great signal to the central bank once again think about it about this value, but not

this, the main thing, after all, the central bank, fighting inflation. let him mind his own business, but i repeat that in order to solve strategic problems, we need a completely different approach to financing, which, by the way, was another misconception or another template when the president also said this. we must live as if, well, not that through. how much does he earn. how much are we spending right? this is about the fact that we must support the existing economy, based on the opportunities that our economy provides us with. i'm only talking about what's in our in a situation, exports will always exceed imports, because this is how the situation has developed, including the price, but when we talk about the fact that the budget should be built in such a way that we spend, focusing on earning. we must be very careful about the following concept, we have a don before a special military operation. they were very, uh, loyal to foreign direct and indirect investments, and so on. why because it was believed that these investments would be directed to what development should be directed to our economy. all this investment is not there, and the

public sector should know this place . therefore, public funding. i return to the target mission on a scale that the economy needs does not allow. and the needs of the economy can afford the state. today we stopped arguing about what should be what the value of the ruble exchange rate should be. why because closing and foreign exchange regulation and closing the possibility of exporting capital implies the possibility of virtually any injection into our economics of funds directed to industrial production. not what the president said. uh, to appeal to the west, when they pumped up money, that demand, and production, not long ago, brought it to europe, or rather, to asia. sorry and research, today we are investing in production, creating the prerequisites for the development of demand and thus controlling both inflation and the exchange rate. the main thing in this is the stability of the exchange rate for many years, that’s all, they’ll sort out the rest there, when we talk about the fact that the ruble is the only one in investment currency. i would like to return to the

topic. well, let the central bank deal with the digital ruble. well, let the euroset discuss with all countries, who is ready to work with us in the bi-currency basket, who is ready to develop this topic, please, and we will have a digital currency that will ensure the functioning of this money. and thus, it will also allow controlling inflation. well, inflation is not a panacea for everything, and the president said very importantly that our goal is not import substitution, of course, not enlightenment, but import independence. we must have a production that will not allow anyone else to look at our country. as a mood incapable of defending itself, including in the military sphere. we must become all preconditions. and by the way, returning to a new territory or refer to a new territory. i would like to say that the costs should. go out of budget. we must consider it on this territory as economically ready to implement ideas there, to implement them, based on the understanding that production there is the future income and these territories of russia, including research , should be invested there, not based on our budget capabilities, but based on the capabilities of

the needs of the economy of these territories. therefore, again, a colored mission, and we can achieve there very quickly a result that will allow breathing life not only into the economic, but also into people e, provide confidence in the future and ending at least say that speaking about what e indicates to the president the need for a full cycle of economic development, including, i repeat, the technological production staff. he also talks about the need to support the nation through what through constant attention to this. and this is a state order, as discussed here, what is more reliable for production, if not the fact that the state supports production, naturally affects this, so strategic planning is low. rates and most importantly without collateral loan. stop running into business. and when we enable this business to concentrate all resources on the implementation of the current tasks, we provide, thereby , control over the economy, and most importantly, the material and technical base for possible future

conflicts, which i do not welcome, but i think i agree with the general enough. we must be ready for him. i'd rather say. let him speak, 5% industrial mortgage does not have time to quiet putin's voice in the hall. they will immediately collect 7% ready. well, that is there, which is already good. so, we can, mariupol needs to be restored, the city, because soon someone was trying to build someday. how long life takes in terms of obtaining permits, it is immediately said here, so the military builders have already entered the people, the equipment will be there by the fall by several thousand. residential apartments of the right quality on the site of the market are already building with might and main , talking about the market and the plan, that is, when the state sets a task, then everything is solved immediately, if the state does not formulate a task, then, of course, various cleverness begins, so you need not to be embarrassed to set a task

vladimirovich, so i want to congratulate you pitersky forum. he, in the political diplomatic plan , became informational, like a volley. iskanders or daggers. generally. i think it's worth it , all these myths that were putin's health, fortune. elites, everything, just boldly. well, they will then try to revive them again, but a very important point. what did margarita simonov say about, and what did the tacticians say? why are they all here in russia, this culture, cancellation. why why did they violate? own rule back there, but because if they left them, they would just lost the competition. they could not withstand open competition with russia, and now just let's look at the last speech of putin lukashenko and compare it with what western leaders say, it's just frankly straightforward here, and there are some scraps of

political correctness of hysteria and some kind of ideological such fanaticism . everything is very clear and frank. here we are talking, er, more precisely, president putin is talking about national interests. we remembered lithuania and think how to punish it. well we in minsk were also not against it. punish someone in lithuania, but let's just look at the national interest of both poland and the baltic states, their entire strategic line goes against national interests, because in the national economic interests of any baltic countries, normal relations with russia and belarus they would just get such a profit. imagine venspils klaipeda riga without russia and belarus, they are meaningless, this is the culture of cancellation will be their ports. that's more if she supported normal relationship with germany russia would be the richest country would control all these flows. it would really be a corridor, but this does not happen between the west and the east.

first, they clearly marked the difference between western europe and eastern europe, and in western europe, the united states manages to consolidate them by the method. remember obama, he recently made a speech that he shouted and kicked. here you can see how this is macron's liver sausage, just

shouting with kicks, and in eastern europe these elites, they themselves want to ask against themselves, they raised them and here, by the way, i would argue that russia has been integrated into this unipolar world. it was not fully integrated, which is one of the reasons. this uprising is now russia because russia wanted to integrate, and she was told no. here, move aside the one who will not be supported to be integrated, then why would the separatists, if they wanted to integrate, publicly discuss how many parts of russia they would not divide russia did not want to integrate. the reason for this putin rebellion, if you like, putin's evolution is that russia in this world had no place and the masters of this world did not see russia as a normal independent sovereign place in this world. it just wasn't there. it was forced. if you like a step, but problems. that's what we're talking about someone trying to sit on two chairs. and this, in general, is a normal situation for the revolution from above. this is political

inertia, when there is a president, the leader is the people who will support him, and between them there is a layer of bureaucracy. uh, the remnants of the oligarchy, who do not need it. here is our president overcame in the nineties, because few people know, in the late nineties at the beginning of the 2000s, there was just a large layer, and she did not even support lukashenka's bureaucracy of the old post-soviet belarus, even tried some kind of conspiracy. time is lining up there and thank god russia has now managed to avoid this, but there is political inertia and this is a personnel problem, including this one. and this is a problem that we often talk about, the problem with russia's allies is this. but he said he was on the forum, because of course, just like this there was a terrific phrase when he first said that well, we immediately have a democratic society in kazakhstan, therefore it is possible, a public discussion, and through the defa he immediately said that well, you will subdue russian journalists and

russian politicians who allow you to speak, which the leaders of kazakhstan do not like, i thought an interesting idea of ​​​​open democratic does not apply to me, so why not? no, it's just that 's right, because it looks very funny with one sides boast of internal democratic. is this a society where you can conduct any discussion, and on the other hand, forbid such a discussion in russia. yes, he was a smart president, i actually respect the problems that exist in the post-soviet space. these are once again the tracks of these nineties, when they worked quite merged, and we see the current russian line, as if they froze this process a little later questions, he asked everything about allies, that is, belarus, in general, is yours, as the main only ally once again emphasized after the twentieth year and before the twentieth, also before the twentieth year. if you throw it away for a few months, then yes you are, it's just that

after the twentieth year, the optics changed. you see , just like that, after a few months of the twentieth year, an understanding appeared thank god that we all have vectors. yes, understanding. yes, of course, but the problem is still ideas. here, if we look, what was discussed a lot at the st. petersburg forum. this, uh, is still a criticism of the current world system. it's still a little anti-western. and it is important that we propose an idea to be crossed. they are gradually doing this, but so far this problem remains in reality. this is more potential, because these are dormant unused resources, due to which the one we are close to, to which putin spoke, blitzkrieg of the west against russia, failed. why did not take place? there 's unrest conspiracies lead didn't happen economic collapse and so on because the west underestimated these dormant resources, and russia until february 22 , it was not obvious enough to

use them now, the question is to unleash these economic measures to their full potential. these are informational measures, these are political ones. and if you like, you know, someone often criticizes the pace of a special military operation, these are not all the same people. well, the same people who argued lying on the couch. and here, why they didn’t surrender leningrad and that’s why they stormed berlin, it was necessary to surround it and wait until they were hyper hungry there before you change it, you understand, and now they are recruiting he speaks. no. you don’t need to go faster, really, get in where you don’t understand, you don’t need to push the military under the elbow and point out, you know, a whole blanket has appeared in ukraine. there are some arrests of zhdanova there. in the fourteenth year, which they argued how wrong the beetles fought, they also partly, here the ideology and official ukrainian historiography is that all soviet commanders were mediocre. here they are. they sincerely believe in it, in fact. and these couch experts are from about the same category. further confirmation is very important here. i

liked some english, a madman in uniform said nothing, russia's results for taking an insignificant territory. insignificant, the territory is a fifth of ukraine. i looked in square kilometers , politely speaking, it is equal to all of england, in fact, this is the most fertile. that is, he believes, well, that the territory is the territory of all of his england. i thought that she remembered britain, or rather, the british empire on such a thing that he never knew, but the fact is that there is logic. he could still say, because the same western experts. okay ukrainian western. they argue, well, severodonetsk. you know, this is not a fundamental point later, when reinforcements are pumped in, - he says - this is a very important point. the fate of the donbass is being decided there, and they have these assessments that change depending on the success in russia, what it arrests is now pretending to be the bbc, that is, the bbc

russian service is just completely arrestovich. that is, the set of brad that they carry on behalf of british intelligence and so on arises for me the question is like this, because all the time he said that british intelligence is of high quality, but the nonsense that they publish makes me doubt, or they didn’t transfer the brand to the arrest officer for a while, but yes, there is an interesting process going on there that we call ukrainization of the west is such, but again, this is what the americans allowed. here are the insults from kiev, for example. in politicians, it’s not that they are so bold and bright, it’s the settling of the score in washington with berlin for nord stream 2 for the policy that they pursued. here they insult mouth. there e zelensky arrestovich. miller is nothing more than that, uh, so do not overestimate. here such independence is the self-confidence of the ukrainian or kiev politicians who are now arriving there, but in any case, now the principal task. the st. petersburg forum has shown these potentials to open up to solve these

crisis moments. not so much the military sphere. how much in the political economic and diplomatic? well, i wish i were here. if you were waiting for you to say and most importantly, do not let such people back, because belarusian furniture. maybe completely replace everything. these are our problems, we are trying. well, you can. yes, we can, if you help . take it, although the truth is, someone is trying to buy now. british intelligence what margarita quoted, and the supreme commander in the third part about the environment. world, colonel floor map knows, it's better than me there are several types of game environment there is a tactical nasty.

strategic deeper mile lip more deep it is more effective when all paths would be cut off, then not a single howitzer would hit the territory of either berezhnaya ukraine. seryozha if you still want us to reach transnistria and climb up. i understand correctly, it was enough near the dnieper, but probably the russian command had, uh, its own limitations. uh, both our goal and the forces that we decided to conduct the operation came to the conclusion that there will be, the environment that will be. i don’t argue with this one thing, i ca n’t understand. i don't understand how it can be shelling for 2 hours. in the modern army , this cannot be. according to the state of the russian forces, this should not be there for 2 hours. art shelling.

i don't know what it's called. cannot pass today in the modern army. say gunshots more than a few battery fight should have put them down much faster. i know that the russian army knows how to do it and can do it. if they don’t deliver it, it can’t be more than 5 minutes. it won't fail anymore. and what and how to do this? artillery always was the most effective part of the russian army. and besides, there are still additional forces. so, well hear 2 hours from the shelling, i don't know, i guess not only me. and the fact that, uh, something that happened on the way, he said again, and once again

confirmed what the west does not want to listen to. the unipolar world is over, what has been so far says, we want to get away from it, it does not exist. he is not. and no matter how they spin, they must understand this. and they already understand it. it's just that they have problems with themselves to admit it officially openly. but the polar world is over and what lukashenka said he is absolutely right. the changes have just begun. and god alone knows how far they will reach, maybe even doshitsa. but already the world is completely different and this is probably what the sausage

is saying, but the european union needs to be changed. it is necessary to change the european union, will it change and since it will be measured, will it survive or not? i don't know. eh, comrade, medvedev can't believe it. let's see if he's right. with regard to the british, here i want to say everything that they promised, it does naturally. and right and traditional for england withdrew from the european union. gotta prove that she's right. that is, strange as it may seem, but england is also talking about this. yes, she will fight against the european union, she does not need it. england needs other alliances to play first fiddle and that's why she flirts with the balts, that's why she talks to poland that's why johnson left everything in england the next day he went to

kiev he needs alliances led by great britain and what will happen to the european union he doesn't care britain is never interested in europe is coming. and so now, on top of all the problems, the struggle of great britain for its place under the sun, as a strong great country, will be. by creating other unions and breaking those that are, because there she plays the main violin. who went to kiev what these will determine and you don’t like bucharest and you don’t like bucharest what because paris went fourth was rome berlin and

bukharan, no one noticed him. i did not notice romania this is something this is something near moldova this is the remnant of the great roman empire. this the one that grabbed your seam. this is the only one. this is the one from whom zelensky asked for money. nobody has ever asked romania for money. zelensky asked, has anyone ever received money from this romanian? no, not zelensky will not work. here but it's in moldova got a prime minister or is she the president of the president? she is a romanian citizen. well , that's it. it is what putin said that was interesting and he

said that it is very very important in the new world that is being created now. will determine the world order, only strong self-sufficient sovereign states of those who have no strength. to do this, they will not participate in this, that is, no principalities, no hams, rudeness under fictitious or not fictitious national flags. they are not yet states. and they won't play any role. and let them not puff up, as you like. i repeat once again what haru-e, the king of the furuka said in the middle east in the middle east, there is so much one state, egypt, the rest is everything. i think so under national flags. i can repeat his

words in relation to the former soviet union territory of the former soviet union there is only one state. and everything else under one or another national flag. principality of rudeness rudeness of the county walk the field does not matter they are not self-sufficient. they are self-sufficient and cannot determine world politics. everyone should understand this. that's what they say, experts say, they have a gut feeling where it's all going, so they said, and now we'll concentrate 40,000 military men. we will not go to the territory of ukraine, not to the territory of ukraine. why because after ukraine they give us

will be needed, that is, they understand that the present is a struggle after ukraine. and the fact that now on the territory of ukraine is a prelude and that's when the prelude ends. before the final there will be a real symphony. and that's when they're ready. and once again i want to return, and what year? i'll call shoigu after any sergei kozhugovich. we were told in december that you are not planning any summer holidays. it definitely was. it's true. you said everything, did not consult. that's why let's not be shy when we walk to go. what are you preparing for the final? well

first to the semi-finals. will not worry. and when i said there will be elections. e in the liberated areas - your president said in september he did not speak at all zap. i'm plebeians for joining russia . that's what your president said. i don't have one answer for this. that's when he said he quoted, and ukraine entered russia three was the 16th century. with three regions chernihiv zhytomyr and kiev therefore exaggerated that's what he had in mind. according to one version, with what did you come with whom and leave?

and according to another version, since russia came and gave it and in russia it will remain. here is the answer. i don't know, but there is a difference. yes exactly in three territories only. only a gift from comrade stalin to ukraine. i don't know how he would react to this, but he doesn't think it's a natural part of modern ukraine, which should remain in ukraine, and who should it belong to or not? well, i don't think the russian president is in the mood to hand out gifts. more hungary romania and stuff, well, let's see what will happen, well, the question is these three areas, what is it? is it

a gift from ukraine to russia or is it something that fell into the remnant of all of today's ukraine, in his opinion, we will see this in the final. so, uh, it's going to be very, very interesting. after the completion of what is going on on ukrainian territory, a grandiose symphony will begin. i don't know how to correct or correct the president. no need no need. yes, because some empires, when ukraine became part of russia, ukraine did not belong. because here are the cossacks, just these sections are here. zaporozhie the russian-polish war of eternal peace in 1686 from

poland and kiev and chernihiv and e, so we call kiev with towns, therefore, it also transferred kiev, in general, the city was not a ukrainian city. if you read even carefully read, uh, taras shevchenko gogol yes, gogol studied the archives there in order to write this, uh, there are ukrainians in kiev. somehow it wasn't so special. so coal or taras shevchenko huh? yes, yes, yes, i'm because taras bulba got a little confused. well, if you carefully, in general, read it, then there will be it is clear that kyiv was inhabited. in general, other people are watching. the jews were remembering that we buy a pole. well, as we bought the eternal world, we don’t buy it with money there. there was money, i correctly remember the crimean khan sold it to the lithuanians. and when lithuania united in the commonwealth, it went to the pereyaslav rada, it was transferred, don’t

offend it, and it’s close to kiev, they don’t have a city for a long time, kiev well, yes, the city of kuev, based on which it became clear that it was not a cue and all the others were, and there was a certain. excuse me excuse me margarinovna, a certain kui who founded this city and that's it. we remember the rest with him, kiev is the mother of russian cities, apparently, everything and returning the old woman to her homeland is also clear, but the simple fact is that, as if succession was a family, because we are now talking a lot about the world order . so this is the world order. so the world is such a bookcase. yes, you can't change the closet. we are now trying to attach to it there to go into outer space and increase this territory, but nonetheless. here he is, how existed, so exists, each great power takes its shelf and the world order is

how books are arranged on these shelves when there is a world war. it comes with shaking. this is how the cupboard is pushed by the books, the winners fall there, then they are arranged. so, in principle, in principle, in my opinion, the world order is arranged, the united states, after the soviet union gave up, disappeared, gave up its regiment. rather, russia gave away its mass of its shelves. she did not participate there in the eastern i gave it to europe. she left her shelf called the post-soviet space. that's when we decided to rearrange our books in the post-soviet space somehow. we were told no no no no rules. because the rules are set by whoever has the most of these books the most shelves. now, of course, this order is not completed, because this shake-up and chaos of the ejection of books and the cabinet did not happen; now such a slow re-piping is taking place. we are

at the very beginning of this period. revisiting this world order. i repeat again because it is a very important thing to note that the world order changed for the first time in the early nineties without a big war, so i fundamentally disagree. there, when biden is criticized about the fact that he said that he was the commander-in-chief who made the decision on sanctions, as the commander-in-chief, since he is not a politician in this, he is absolutely right, because in diplomatic tools from simple verbal here, well, before the declaration of war, there is gradation such as economic embargo sanctions and the like, and the cold war stopped precisely on this line, not until the end before the declaration of a hot war, and here biden is right, he did not declare it. naturally. this is announcing his predecessor, but nevertheless biden acts like a commander in chief imposing sanctions sanctions are always a tool of the commander in chief of a politician, so this is an impossible wording of

course, which is why it looks rather strange to accept. he is the decision precisely as the commander in chief he is fighting with us, and he considers us to be politics, you know much more from the politician tools, the criminal commander is here. he views ours not as a political partner of a political competitor or interlocutor. he treats us like an enemy and it's no coincidence that here. uh, the american administration is the national security strategy of the united states. well, in theory, any administration, in a year and a half, publishes this strategy. even now i can't say approximately when the strategy will be published. biden administration anal security, that is, now acting a strategy that was adopted in december 17 by trump and introduced in january 18 years before the main teams. you yourself also quoted this, the law of the concept, but when

they take us, as an enemy, the attitude towards us is somewhat different, but we understand the enemy, the enemy, of course, and now he must determine which enemy, but you understand, yes ? yes, what kind of enemy is the most interesting thing, that the national security strategy of the european union will now be released on the european union, let me stop a little more, so to speak in detail, because we are now criticizing the european union, but in principle the european union, after all, not only an economic union, when vladimir vladimirovich said at this forum that you are not against ukraine's entry into the european union. union frankly, i am against ukraine joining the european union and i will explain why there is no carbonari and i will explain why. the fact is that the european union is not only an economic association. yes , indeed, the europeans have created a single internal market and 67% of all products

manufactured in european countries are sold in this market. this is a very close internal connection, but the european union begins the first steps towards european integration. i mean, the plans for a renaissance also assumed the military-political component of the fifty-third year the western european union was created, this union was dissolved in the tenth year, because with the presence of nato , there can’t be a single european, military structure, as by definition there can be can not americans. it just won't be allowed to happen, but, nevertheless, european leaders, current and past leaders. they insist that the european union should have this military dimension. let's remember macron in november of the seventeenth year of the european army. and what does it mean if ukraine joins the economic union of the european union, and for some reason, for example, the fact that the united states

leaves nato, focusing on the asia-pacific region, nato immediately turns into a military structure, which means a european member. nato nato will look for a structure, most likely the eu military structure , moreover, if america leaves nato, then what turns into, what nato turns into, nato turns into a purely european structure, but i don’t think it will come out. i'm just not convinced, i say, there is a european if european, it stops being because there is no north atlantic because there is no usa yes, a european structure is a european structure. does not become a structure, either the europeans, still achieve a little bit of the british, or the europeans, still achieve in order for them to create their own military structure. what they are aiming at now means that all members of the european union automatically become members. nato, when we are talking about lithuania yes,

lithuania guaranteed that there was a crime in the eu, this transit through e from russia to the kaliningrad region will be preserved. sa- this obligation will be fulfilled, they will not be fulfilled. what, if anything, has already been discussed here. i don't want to just repeat myself now, so intro and intro ukraine to the european union, is fraught with the fact that ukraine may find itself in one or another military structure in the foreseeable future, so wait a second, if you agree, then agree to the same neutrality that switzerland has switzerland does not participate in military structures or in economic structures. that is, it is independent or any other neutrality that existed in europe as we know it, and sweden and finland are now being questioned in the end. i think it has. it's now just a minute

of course, it's better to wait a minute, firstly, no neutrality. no, no one is fulfilling any international agreements, no one is fulfilling any international agreements at all , it is no coincidence that the weapons that were sold to russia by the soviet union. suddenly it turned out on the territory of ukraine, this violation of all international laws in general is against us, because no one even says it was delivered without the permission of russia, the second moment nothing prevents ukraine from joining the eu in military development through a direct agreement with the united states. what have you talked about many times? where it all begins now you will see everything.

i think it is necessary with both hands to push ukraine into the country with everything that remains of it, because then the eu receives an extremely low level of income for the population. how much there is 60 euros 100 euros per month, the average salary of 160 does not matter there, that is, the infinitely low level of pensions is several times lower. a wild lack of all social guarantees, and this is 8% of the size of the european union. that is, you have the european union then must either lower all their standards, because they have a wild number of hungry poor who do not know how you will have such an economic blow to the european union, or privatize our 300 billion and invest it can be privatized. 300 billion, anywhere to invest them. it won't do anything. these are pennies that will dissolve in a moment, because when you are 20 million people who are used to taking, not counting

that there will be something for this, among which 300,000 with machine guns, who will not have borders, who inlau stingers who have everything and to whom you say go picking strawberries. they will say, we 'd better blow up a couple of banks the level of meditism the level of corruption in ukraine instantly intolerance will spread to europe the european union listen, germany can not digest east germany for many decades, and here they will have to digest ukraine yes, please, the european union will be nothing european fall apart and crack before our eyes. ukraine will bring all its characteristic features of the hatred of shtetl. this is the political ukrainians loyalty to banderi. there, mother, do not worry , the european union will begin, you will not accept ukraine. it is clear that the pathetic assumption is that the union will take ukraine, so no , take it, take it, and then we will watch.

we simply cannot allow the european union to allow ukraine to join it in any foreseeable future , ukraine will not live to see this. i also think that it should not necessarily need all of ukraine, which at this moment will still be let it not enter there, all of ukraine - this is what is meant by force ukrainians, now it's right no, all ukraine, which by this time will be all of ukraine so what will happen by this time. well, maybe lvov villages will remain to have in mind vladimir's daughter. but i don't think that margarita. i don't think there should be anything left of her. well, the fact is that when vladimir vladimirovich also reasoned, yes, they took the ramparts from them, they took away the heads of the head from not others. yes, and here it is a hodgepodge. i do not think that ukraine is capable of existing as a separate link, as a unit, and therefore now it is necessary to set the task of the fact that the termination, so to speak , of the activities of this association only for the

territorial is good, who are you looking for, because by and large then you still don’t like it on the political map of the world, put a cross. here i am, too. therefore, let's solve problems gradually and as far as we decided from a person who wants to reach his mother, right, that's why i ask, suddenly you are with me. i suggested, first, let's be precise. i suggested, firstly, to reach a coma. i have business there today that is not completed, if watch in europe and in england i suggested, yes, that, he quotes the western media in this way. well , you also wanted to call raguzin, yes, dmitry olegovich, ask if everything is fine, then what exactly alaska will fly in and california will remind you of. what is the name of alaska, yes, and everything from crimea, of course. so listen, well may islands. we joke about it. yes

, jokes are jokes. they know how things will turn out, but for any tasks at all, consider that we if we can use the armed forces against members of the natata. i seriously consider these here, if the united states of its members will not start this then this is the end they mean that the nation does not use the armed forces against us. i think that it will also not apply yet, as they can, it cannot happen. well, hello, here i accidentally have these that the poles have added, they can do anything at any moment, and then nato will sit and think, as with the turks who shot down our plane at one time. sit down and think about what to do with it. nat's brain sits behind the atlantic. look, it doesn't matter where he sits. but then it was a tantrum in nato, they didn’t know what to do if russia was hammering on turkey. and now, for example, the poles will strike at belarus, it’s possible that there is a very high probability

of some kind of provocation from the territory of privalka, there is a very high probability that we won’t join our ally. let's intervene, that's right, then everything is the third, world war, in general, you need to understand that we are standing from a full-scale nuclear war in seconds. and all the rhetoric that sounds from the other side, and not from our side, i can have fun with us. there margarita can strongly hint, but we are not politicians. we just show the urgency of the topic, but politicians declare it there. that's the difference. vladimir vladimirovich just says, very calm and balanced, but look at johnson's hysteria. look at the hysteria of their howling, which is preparing to fight with russia, look at what 's going on with the warheads. what difference does it make how many warheads he has he understands. you yourself say that tomorrow your warheads will be heavily american, because if they are not heavily american, then the united states they will not. i mean, i don't know if there is.

maybe i understand you offer at the same time. and broom. no, if you hit then yes, that is, right away, yes, that is, you will adjust at the same time how to avoid it now. well, now we are fighting a wild number of foreigners, who yesterday they were combat units, today they supposedly, volunteers have already turned hundreds of them there and the good ones will continue to do so, johnson says we will train 12 or how many thousand ukrainian soldiers there? where will he cook them? what territory on the pool in poland most likely, which means that these are legitimate targets for us to strike on the territory, they are no longer considered. as far as i understand, yes, we don't know while this is a very serious question, it's very difficult. you demote to colonel general, that is, a de-factor. let's look realistic realistic. we are on the verge of being

so responsible politician. here among all one putin, on the other hand, a responsible politician is more or less biden. how are you right. say look at johnson look at those who only go to kiev in bunches european politicians and a separate johnson and these bunch come in one car. disgrace, how offended sausage is, to be honest, to be honest, it will be said in his mind, but still it disgusts me to repeat the miller because let the miller keep himself, i will not name him. that's right, but he is offended, he is offended, but i imagine tomorrow's headlines in the german press with horror. uh, at the party. vladimir solovyov has several generals margarita simonyan, dean of a higher educational institution, representative the belarusian representative of germany enjoyed

discussing the attack on the english channel there on alaska, on the contrary, and so on, well, i ask myself one question. how did they see it? after all, everything is closed. good question, how did they look at it? i watched in full the evening with vladimir solovyov they will show trick and fau show glare the four swiss will show, but there is glare and fau. it's just that they parodied solovyov there. it needs to be looked at, of course. in what voice did they read a couple of words there that were not on the program, but they done. this, of course, is all ridiculous, but here oleg viktorovich said about brand. well , the problem is that this is the era of great chancellors. she's over. it ended, of course, not on the scholz. i think that it did not even end with angela merkel, although she, of course, we are on bismarck. well, it's probably over. she is on bismarck, by the way, merkel is trying to behave quite tough, and even now when she is being tortured, she maintains

such a line that i did everything, i did everything, right. therefore, whatever you say in particular everything about energy dependence or independence i see no problems. eh, for which i could be scolded, therefore, in this regard, she showed herself rather harshly. now, as for everything else, um. here is the most important conclusion that the germans made, the german media wrote about putin's speech, they wrote putin rhetorically attacked the whole of the rest of the world. well, you need to understand what is what is the concept of this rhetorical they are all rhetorical they they perceive any spoken phrase, even taken out of the context of some kind of russian film there, is funny, like some kind of comedy, and then insert it into their speeches in their reports, and for them it sounds like some kind of rhetorical an attack on the rest of the world, and this situation is actually connected in the first place. it seems to me with a failed system of globalization. that is why

russia has become the number one target, and, if a military operation had begun in eastern ukraine, it would not have started against russia anyway. should have been some specific attack was carried out, maybe even a military one, because it did not fit into this system of globalization. russia, together with russia, is still china. i think, probably, after all, india is globalizing. let yakov always not be offended by me, but she envisaged the whole world as such one kibbutz, when everyone, in general, to a certain extent, was equalized by one religion, one commodity-money relationship, one protection. well, it's probably going to be different. i have never been there. i just imagine it according to some soviet the truth. you know why each whale is a separate ideology, all boots adhere to one ideology. well, so, that, all this is approximately and right here in this plan. and of course, when the

theorists of globalization were planning all this, they, of course, stumbled because they did not imagine that they would not be able to build all of you into this system and the first. what did they fall into. these are, of course, western values. after all , it was not by chance that they practically did not destroy all religious foundations, both catholic and, evangelical and whatever they had, they tried to replace it all. it is with these new values ​​and these new values ​​to fill this global world. well, russia doesn’t fit into this global world with these new erzations of religion, but it didn’t fit in the same way as china, i think, probably, india in the same way and when all this arose. this is the understanding that this global world will not be like this - this is a system of globalization. she began to crumble, then arose. as a matter of fact, there is only one question, or russia needs to be subdued and entered into this system of globalization with new ones. with those with this new ideology, in which russia will be here, as one of

such members of this entire community, where everything is the same for everyone, including some basic moral foundations, or russia needs to be defeated somehow and forced to e force change and here is the change. it went in the form of this powerful roll on russia starting from e. the time of nato expansion and ending, of course, with all these gestures related to ukraine, because ukraine of course, this is just a way to try to stick russia. here in this system of general globalization, realizing that russia will not agree to this . and then it will be necessary, uh, there will be a basis for applying sanctions for the use of some kind of military action against russia, and this system has gone, but unfortunately for them, but it turned out that they can’t do anything here either, because uh, that’s what, what we have seen in the last few days. this is a sign that even that internal globalization. which they imagined. here is a division

or a connection of some kind of society. it did not take place, because the visit of the troika plus uh, romanians and the next day. johnson's visit absolutely clearly showed that this unity does not exist in this system of the globalized world, and it goes further and further. we will move on, the further the split within this system will go june 2 germany will supply weapons to ukraine no, no, germany will not supply weapons to ukraine i think that this issue will generally be moved. uh, i don't know, for how long, because the scholz must be given back. he owes him absolutely unequivocally, firstly, while in kiev, he never answered questions about the supply of weapons. secondly, e, what you didn’t think there, you didn’t write in the bild and in focus. uh, germany itself cannot give permission, it is not ready. well, by the way, as you know, germany now has big problems, including, in my opinion , with slovakia, which the german leopards did not want to take and deliver, uh, the highest soviet tanks to

the territory of ukraine, as for the exchange ring, they had to give 30, and they were given 15%. yes and germany came out very harshly against the spaniards, who even already apologized to germany, uh, so there will be no deliveries of these tanks from the territory of spain yet. and most importantly. uh, in spite of all anti something there i wanted to say, in spite of all your love. the chancellor to our beloved german chancellor olaf schulz is still quite beneficial for russia today, because it means it will be enough courage, for example, to give me an interview as you see. now let's check how courage is enough. i'm ready the difference is that sansa so you guys are his problem i can’t, that’s why they watch the program, we’ll meet in serbia belarus that you can explain

anything, if they have the audacity to follow hitler, it is considered their main enemy of a journalist do not compare themselves with levitan, we are many levitan's heirs but it was hitler who was afraid of journalists, then they will now understand if europe is hitler's political heir there, they will be afraid to speak to journalists. and if they are really democrats, then let them cancel sanctions imposed against russian citizens. well interview at the same time. well, you know, in the end, i want to say about the schultz. he brought with him. well, he brought such leaks, his plan for zelensky. they say he didn’t hand it to him and didn’t hand it to him, because there was just that person whom yakov forgot about. there arrived unexpectedly a representative of, er, glorious, romania, which, in general, no one there expected even for a schulz. it was a complete scrapping of all plans. he wanted to come there, like some kind of peacemaker who will give zelensky his daddy with a

piece of paper that was inside zelensky will then come out and say i agree to everything, and then suddenly there was some other johan from whom everyone did not expect. well, how to get this piece of paper when these plans have not been agreed with anyone, so scholz returned, terribly dissatisfied. and , of course, he didn't give any consent. but as for membership, very briefly, membership of ukraine or the eu, of course, they will give candidate status, but believe me, nothing shines for the next 50 years. will there be ukraine what will remain of ukraine, where is ukraine being quiet rude, they are striving straight for europe , it is not known right in the eu. true, how many of them will go there, and most importantly, really live fully meets all the criteria fully meets, really. europeans don't know about it. they say that it is completely inconsistent with the

ukrainians. they say you will specify another criterion for us. you generally imagined nothing europeans. and well, quickly accepted europe so, well, yes, of course. how wonderful the mood is, when we talk about europe, we must understand that even our great ancestor lomonosov confirmed that there is a law of conservation of energy. if you take away somewhere, then somewhere you need to add. here comes the uk . ukraine must enter. that's all ivan ticket in that direction to the west, by the way, it's curious what is the main thing. recently, boris johnson has obviously become a consultant to the leadership of ukraine, this is exactly the one, that is, the prime minister of the very country that made his chip out of the european union zelensky, all of ukraine, if you believe zelensky, is rushing into the european union, somehow it does not coincide with one

another. but if in essence, then i want to say that of course. what we call a special military operation is underway. but it seems to me that we have all come to understand internally that this is a special military operation. it has two incarnations - this is the patriotic war. for the survival and preservation of russia in the world, which she leads not only and not so much with ukraine as with the west united by the united states? and on the other side, this is the same postponed civil war. for the preservation of common values, as they say in such cases, but we have other common traditions of common general principles of a common state of a common past common city, especially when it

comes to the mother of cities, the russian city of kiev concerns the very ukraine, which for some reason decided that the word ukraine in slavic languages, meaning just the outskirts is actually something special. they are just a fact of geography, this part of our common world, which on some at this stage, she succumbed to the temptation to believe that she had absolutely nothing to do either in the past or with her neighbors, but was something completely separate from herself. uh, special, and so on, if at all to draw some kind of analogies according to european patterns, it seems to me that it is somewhat similar to catalonia in spain. spain developed over a long time, as the spanish empire collapsed, but retained its influence in the hispanic world. i have great

respect for this catalonia on the outskirts of the ukraine spain felt that because it is closer to some euro printing centers in germany or in france then, it will be a separate independent there, in my opinion, the two sibilants differ from the spanish language on this basis. we are generally more europeans. here are the spaniards they are not the same, but those and so on. there are of course different versions in order to not be free. it seems to me that so often catalonia is offended. i began to worry about dimon's path. in catalonia, like any territory that strives for independence , it has the right to do so in order for this right conquer. indeed, it must pass through the test through sacrifices. etc. the donbass goes through these sacrifices throughout the use of the famous formulation in the fight you shake your right so they argued and i don’t think they were

wrong. but i just want to say that, on the basis that you are closer to the european union, on this basis, to consider that you are something special in this is not enough. and now , it seems to me, we are coming, uh, the need to decide on the military-political leadership of our countries are responsible for making these decisions. but it seems to me that it is not enough just to exit on the border of donetsk and luhansk regions in this way. the acquisition of the full sovereignty of the dpr lpr in this territory, in which they claim as a state, but it is also important to understand that kherson, zaporozhye, kharkov and odessa and nikolaev regions. these are the very territories within ukraine that have traditionally developed as novorossiya. which commands the percentage of the russian russian -speaking population, which in no way

were not acquired by the hetmans until the pereyaslav rada, which they had nothing to do with it , where the cities were built by the efforts of catherine the great potemkin, where before the arrival of the russian empire there was a wild field, from which ukrainians and russians and poles and everyone who did not belong to the turkish-tatar premium at all. and here, based on these circumstances. of course, we must outline the prospects for this military operation. yesterday. it didn't sound. more precisely the day before yesterday. i think it sounded and not only the day before yesterday during many of our programs. no. no about what putin said because putin is not accidental when he described the current situation. he says, and what does it have to do with russia in general? in russia, the russian empire fought, he said, with the turkish empire. well, although there was an ottoman one. yes, yes,

and what does ukraine have to do with it in general, what did he already say? ukraine came with three regions. well , stalin took the rest there, took it from someone. it seems to me that putin never, by chance , says anything, that is, well, everyone will hear the supreme and president of our country, because this discussion continues to develop in different corridors of power, including our hearts, on which the heart should rest. it seems clear to me that there will be no genetics and demolitarization, no neutrality in those territories that will remain under the rule of the current kiev regime. it cannot be and will not be. or we should set ourselves the ambitious task of reaching the border of the soviet union in this direction in general. but i believe that this is not only a great sacrifice, but also the most the main thing. uh, the question of keeping all these

territories after the completion of this military operation is the same question that the soviet union faced after the forty-fifth year, when it came to western ukraine to let the trojan horse into its territory. this is a serious risk of risk , which belonged both before the revolution and after the revolution and which in fact we see was quite er, in this respect it is obvious obvious. here, we face it now. or should we then push back our boundaries so that no e delivery vehicles did not reach the undocumented sea or to donetsk sluhansky, in order to be calm for shipping in the black sea. i have just returned from sevastopol met from the command of the black sea fleet from the veterans and residents of this city, who was a pioneer in returning to their native, harbor, i believe that people are us. i just know that people insist that this is a threat. shifted otherwise calm life on these shores of the black sea will not. different

eras one great power wanted to deceive fate with you you can't deceive these places have a bookish feeling, my heart is free a great country.

love story we watch the history of russia in the application or on the website for free without registration.

i've looked at you complaining. it meant you. well, i was just looking for the previous part, how interesting, it turns out that on the one hand, the leader of kazakhstan says that their society is open there, any possible discussion is possible, but literally through the french.