i just looked at you complaining. it meant you. well, i was just looking for the previous part, how interesting, it turns out that, on the one hand, the leader of kazakhstan says that they have an open society , any discussion is possible there, literally through the frenchman he said that in russia there is no need to lead

to the leadership of kazakhstan as the leadership of any other country that has relations with us within the framework of the akb, and so on. at the same time, i believe that, just like the leadership of kazakhstan, we have the right to our own opinion, and in any case, to react to what the guide says not everything. we think so. unfortunately, but those who, uh, consider it necessary to make comments on this matter. it reminds me of the nineties. i have already gone through the period when i was constantly reprimanded in the nineties. and they even considered me a city madman on the grounds that i say you can’t give our crimea in sevastopol, you need to ensure that these people live normally, so that they don’t ask us why they threw us, why they betrayed us? the same goes for everything else, therefore, when you make these

criticisms of yours. well, sort it out first and understand what the matter is, we cannot but respond to challenges from our opponents and comment, even our allies, when for some reason they take a position that is clearly dissonant in contrast to our ownership of the president. e. tana, for some reason known to him, in the presence of the president of the russian federation, started talking about kvass states about the dpr, but not only in abkhazia, ossetia, we know that kazakhstan does not acknowledged the return of the crimea, we do not demand an answer, kazakhstan, but i would like to note that the allies either have this alliance or not this alliance. uh, if you are allies, then be kind at this moment to show your allied talents, otherwise russia, in turn, also has its own reasons for something. something to overestimate. and you know,

literally two words of the president's st. petersburg speech. i think she calmed a lot of people, but you know me personally, that's what the president's phrase is. here it dispelled me, so to speak, here are all the hesitations and doubts when he said that the most correct and most important thing that any of us can leave to our descendants. this is your name and an example of serving your fatherland. and after this phrase , here i am. well, you know, so some, maybe even, in fact, hesitations about the further development of events. they completely disappeared from me, as far as the situation in ukraine is concerned. i think that last week zelensky missed the last chance that was given to the preservation of ukraine at least within some borders, more or less understandable. and uh, so to speak, he is the old europe, she is tired of ukraine, moreover, she is horrified by the economic confrontation with

russia, the prospects of him and this. want it it was obvious and it seems to me that you have been achieved. they persuaded president putin to give, so to speak, an opportunity and flew off. here are three leaders of european states that romanians do not consider persuading zelensky either. well i said the big one nobody reads, so i said the big european states are romanians. understandably romania is said to have a very big role. transit weapons. there is a chance to face each of the european civil states. mischief, as far as possible, yes, instead of gratitude, you understand this position, but, unfortunately, this is reality, as i understand zelensky to compromise. in europe, but you know

, the clown actor, the husband needs a standing ovation that he provided. yes, he doesn't need anything else. he is not interested in the interests of his people, he is not interested in the lives of tens of thousands of those who have already been killed, and also in the future. if all this continues and there will be hundreds of thousands of those citizens of ukraine that he threw into the furnace do you understand your own ambitions? unfortunately, today ukraine is managed by people who introduced discotheques there yesterday, which have nothing to do with state management of politics at all. here we see the result. they none of them have any relation. well, so to speak, as i understand it, maybe we'll go out, how did he even turn on the topic ? when i saw this picture, i am like a macron, no matter how we relate to the genus scholz. yes, how did they not get up at all and did not leave the table, when here is yesterday's misunderstanding today, today, being president. e, so to speak,

ironically, the president of ukraine came out in a t- shirt. you see, they are sitting, so to speak, some kind of european people, they are voted for by europeans with suits in gas, there is some kind of dress code, there is some kind of diplomatic protocol, do you understand where it smells? why why yes fight fight understand this man i don't know. i think so 5 years ago. there he heard a loud voice in the street, ran around the corner. you see, today the four-fold draft dodger is fighting. oh, by the scales. yes it's not even the point that he has four deviations , the point is in his mentality. see, they're west americans and british, they got caught. well, i say it again, the jester needs a need. why, they won vyacheslav caught him applauding the whole world, and he believes that he, so to speak, so that today serious people in ukraine imagine the truth, how where? akhmed and who do you want

me to be? and who was serious, young? you see the oligarchs. here they are now who's where? well , look there for the answer. if i'm right so to speak, we understand that the british are tough there. here, so to speak, they froze his loans there, and they created conditions for him there. i saw it right here 6-7 years ago. as i understand it, he ran, so to speak, metal was determined. well , the west froze him, they say with a deferred payment of interest for 40 years. eh, so to speak, well, i just gave it as a gift. everything, here, here was the question. why, then, in this ukraine, such people are like all boron cheese, you understand, because , uh, this will be, so to speak, a trigger the beginning of the end magnify the united states amerigo will certainly remain a great country. well one from the great countries, not the country that says either so there are two opinions, yes, the american wrong third opinion, like in august are moving into the circuit. offensive. now i want to talk about this now, yes, proceeding from this, vladimirovich, again, i am in no way

going to give advice, not to the military political leadership, not to everything else. well, i think it's about time. so to speak, take off the handbrake and start fighting for real. we should already start getting serious changes in command are definitely happening. but we are there, we are now there to beat the village. this is extremely important. he is a strong regional and so on. it is necessary to take away, kiev needs to be taken some kind of head, hydras, all the rest will surrender themselves. odessa means. no, of course, it's so to say, it's, of course, they don't admit it, that so many people died in their country. well, then we'll take odessa when we take hai yes, it's clear that this is all this is the finishing form, but you understand, if we take kiev, then the rest, so to speak, with less destruction. they sense of resistance will not. if we if tomorrow block the western borders, and, so to speak

, concentrate on hitting kiev. i would again. i am not a military man. i'm a military man decides. how much is he in any case, so to speak, the pain of this balts is on the way. we see that they generally understand, that is, again, based on this, i can not image. i repeat i'm not going to give it up. i want to go faster, i want the victim to be less, i want the problem to be what? look here . just yesterday, this muck runs around nikolaev, odessa why, if we were shot at these cities? why are we let him run there the president replied on friday. why did he say that we have a regime that does not follow certain rules. so i say, well, i hinted that if these cross over, and they know that the russian territory is already from the wounded already from the dead, in my opinion, you understand, they are not going to stop moreover, they are in the open. they say that as soon as we receive the rso, we will start to hammer on the ukrainian territory on russian territory, it will immediately happen

well after that. why should we wait? this question is not for me, says satanovsky not on my salary, well, yes, or for my benefit, yes, the supreme chief. i understand, i understand that geopolitics i understand everything. well, i want to say this so that you know it ends faster and less. and what about kiev at once ? why not take london? understandably? vladimir vladimirovich, i heard that first odessa was kiev for me, when by chance, of course, a request was first driven away near donetsk, and only then i understand, you choose what you want odessa or kiev or all at once, because what, of course, is happening now in donetsk yes yesterday's footage. these are the glow. uh, only yesterday, five civilians were killed. it is understood 24 wounded

including an eight-year-old boy. and it is now already today there are dead among the civilian population. uh. you are western weapons, indiscriminately do not even hide a civilian object. moreover, yes, and we see, yes, there they deliberately destroyed this school. yes, now i deliberately look at the fire department. why because understood? aha, the fire brigade is talking. all uh, that means if we now deprive them of the ability to put out these fires. here. test it will be better to achieve its goal of the goal of the destruction of donetsk donetsk infrastructure and so on. and of course, we are now dreaming of one thing - that to suppress these firing points in the avdiivka area and, uh, those closest to donetsk, means also to drive these troops to a more or less safe distance from donetsk. that is, of course, it is very important in this yes indeed. that's when, in

these conditions, the words of the president of kazakhstan were heard at the forum. well, i, that is, in fact , he did not say anything new. this is the position of kazakhstan. it was known and voiced. i still remember nazarbayev, nazarbayev, as i remember now, being the elbasy, and in december it’s just in de- well , then, probably, vladimir vladimirovich consciously, i don’t know, by the way, in russian, it’s probably difficult to speak, if the exact established rules of declension. word so i will be a miracle by this same elbasy in december last year, yes? uh, almost the same thing was voiced explaining why crimea is not recognized by kazakhstan. in general, but in general, these sounds are not accidental. they always name taiwan first. why because it voicing china’s foreign policy line but of course, the current president of kazakhstan would have to, yes, but understand, but the peculiarity

is the peculiarity of this moment, that is, look at how, for example, the chinese comment on this, who, of course, also do not recognize the dpr of the lpr. so far, including on all taiwanese issues, but at least they don’t use the terms of a quasi-state of this kind are destructive, because the ukrainian press happily picked up the terms themselves and joyfully use it, that is, in any case, when you even voicing your external political line must be understood. where will you voice it, and at what special moment, when really hard battles are being fought, when, but i really hope that it’s not until the end, in any case, apparently, it went well. and, probably, he really did not take into account, what is better at such moments, some terms should not be used. eh, i guess so. here, as for, uh, the joy of another holiday in ukraine, there is a truly epoch-making event of the european commission. so, approved, recommended

, uh, to give the status of a candidate, then already celebrate the mood that putin eats them for joining. no, no, it will not spoil, because, of course, they present all this as a great plowed achievement. and if the european union this week well, that is, the leaders of the european union still decide to grant such a status, i can assure you that all these celebrations of the association agreement, then the associations of the european union of ukraine they will, uh, be forgotten, because new celebrations are overshadowed. that's how they live from the fight - from the straight line and the straight line. excuse me. i involuntarily considered that for studio talk time. three times we turned to quotations from russian literature . ilfa petrov, crossword puzzler. sinitsky chicks frown. e in ukraine this week finally crossed out all e, russian literature and school programs. and it seems to me, probably, in order to avoid

these illusions, there were no allusions. or rather , to not have this cultural environment. although that's all that is happening today in ukraine as in my opinion. well, it's just that, well, almost a plot from the immortal classics. and of course from gogol, because this is a visit three officials with a bribe as a candidate for the european union means further frights, and this young man whose speech is abrupt, with dust without a king in his head, uh, these are, of course, whips and words fly out of his mouth from his mouth. uh, it was unexpected for him. this, of course, is pure khlestakovism. the immortal plot is all one in one, and it evokes. well, for those who, so to speak, in the context of literature, so to speak, evoke wonderful sensations. yes, as far as, firstly, the classic is immortal. how bright could it be to do, secondly, to what extent this all just corresponds to the fact that this is happening

, but the type does not change. this is repeated over the centuries. and you could take it. e as e comedy and wait. uh, last scene. gogol said that it must be played, superbly. the last scene where everyone has to freeze and change positions, because the lightning will definitely strike, it will definitely happen. here is the exposure of this character, but the tragedy lies in the fact that zelensky in the image of khlestakov is more and more more they begin to resemble chichikov, who are not buying souls, but are trading in the souls of ukrainians this week, and rakhami let slip in some american publication that, according to his estimates, losses per day range from 200 to 500 people, and sometimes up to a thousand, that is, thousands of people a day due to the fact that these people hold on to their ambitions, thousands of political people die a day, and most importantly, what are they talking about now, right?

what the entire ukrainian establishment writes about and kuleba wrote a large article, which we definitely let's not negotiate. we must stand to the last full of determination. give us weapons. um, well, they do know for sure. how many people per day die people they uh just send. well, pain and in fact, i repeat. they don't seem to be buying. they trade these souls to turn them. dead and it seems to me that this is the biggest tragedy for ukraine, that these people, without a king in their heads, who accidentally fell into power , determine not just the fate of the country, they are no longer similar , it is already blurring everything is already in pieces. everything so to speak. well , every day the mantra that we will definitely return everything, the next record of the counteroffensive from june has shifted to august, already there all the time the deadlines are being delayed when we hoist

the flag in simferopol, but just the last performance recorded in zelensky in tambov . well, in general, so to speak, just shocked. e. mantras and inconsistency, i again under the form and content of the inconsistency with the content of these courageous messages and tambour, a car under the sound of wheels , a man who, apparently, went out to smoke, then he begins to tell how the country is holding on, but i repeat, even if you do not pay attention to these details, the biggest tragedy of the country is that these people trade in souls. eh, i send people to be slaughtered, and it seems to me that this is, well, the most difficult of those people who arise when you carefully follow what is happening there now and, probably, it was not by chance that all russian literature was banned so that in the future , if this something is preserved, so to speak, in these features the education system will be preserved in order to those who will study further could not even compare what happened in the country with the

vast experience of mankind, accumulated in the form of literary works in the form of a plot in the form of simply realizing the reality of cyril, this and what we were talking about. the debilitation of the ukrainian people and this tragedy, because they turn smart hardworking kind people, well, into some, well, yes, i will not use the classic formulations about someone who does not remember kinship, but this is generally all sad. look at the womb that reigns in the street which has become the norm, not children at all, women, political leaders of the brand, they hand over t-shirts, they make posters comments on the uterus, which has become the norm of communication, as it is, perhaps, in an orthodox country where everyone understood. well, yes, men swear there somewhere. well, it's taboo vocabulary. and in general, well, it's not good when women and children. see how phenomenal language simplifications are. like the rejection of

literature, the rejection of philosophy from everything, the layers that the russian language gave, while they didn’t learn anything else, and when an attempt to bring ukrainianism, well, the ukrainian is correct , therefore, everything that was created by soviet ukraine also called this history and it turns out that the colossal debilitation of the population is going on. i do not want to be ready just to pick apples in poland for the ukrainian people. vasilyevich, i am one of those citizens of ukraine who are the events that took place this week. they just sadden me, some sadden me, and some i consider tragic already tragic in order. well, according to the prohibitions, ah, the ukrainian government adopted a decision, and the end of the visa-free regime and from july 1, all russian citizens of russia

can enter ukraine only on the basis of a visa. true, it is still unknown where you will take it, it helps a lot. also the presence of a chevron. z, you are just talking with these chevroires, they are allowed into ukraine without any legal action. zelensky as part of the election campaign, a trip to the nikolaev region of the odessa region, and i was simply struck by the phrase of his zelensky who, when he was nikolain, he said that we would not give the south to anyone. i read on again. not we will give it back, he doesn’t say that we won’t give the south to russia either as an invader or donbass, or he tells anyone and this phrase has what meaning it seems to me,

the trip is first of all the president of romania and second. uh, all the other triples in the first place, romania seemed to me very sad because, and the bargaining was very simple. if you paid attention. pay attention and we will not give the south to anyone, because we also plan to give it away so that the russians, uh, lyosha obstovich. and i remember when women said that we will not give mariupol. i remember when he said that, well, it's just in vain to give birth to something. and not only ukraine is given prospects in the european union , candidates are also given, if you paid attention to moldova, ukraine is at war, and president macron and many others said that

if there was no war, she said that if there was no war, then there would be no chance, but since the war, therefore, we are giving chances, but we still have to fulfill three conditions already. she said that corruption must be defeated shifts in the fight against the oligarchy, and the rights of the minority. i will dwell on them later, as regards the young or moldova and the role of the president of romania, you understand the european bureaucrats they think. so listen, let's have a conflict in moldova. well, let's do this, we give transnistria to the russians, and take the rest of moldova for ourselves, romania and we take it to the european means, exactly the same way, ukraine should be given part of russia and part of the european union, what is it? where is the inconsistency here in order to give back to russia it is necessary that the russians pass on foot nikolaev and odessa for