a three-room apartment in the residential areas of yekaterinburg and we are very actively involved in the implementation of individual housing projects, we have almost 40% of the total commissioning of housing. this individual housing construction and the very popular wooden housing construction are in great demand and we are able to satisfy it at our own facilities on our own cheese with the participation of our ural design and engineering schools, and dear vladimir vladimirovich also proposes to reflect in the minutes of instructions the development of support sites for manufacturers of rapidly erected structures. and uh dear vladimirovich colleagues, in conclusion, every year, with the support of the russian ministry of construction, we hold an international construction forum and exhibition 100 plus technobil in yekaterinburg. this year, for the first time , a new section for the production of building materials will be organized. we will consider in detail the issues of technological re-equipment of enterprises of the construction industry, modernization of production capacities, replication

of modern technologies for the production of building materials, i am sure that this event will be useful for further dynamic development construction. so, inviting all of you dear vladimir vladimirovich, you have colleagues to take part in the work of this forum. thank you for your attention, i am ready to answer the question. no thanks no questions. uh, i wanted to thank you for your suggestion regarding hmm lacking in the right amount. domestic materials and equipment technology , and this is precisely the opportunity for our economy and structural changes and qualitative growth. we need to use the vacant niches in the domestic market in order to to fill it, uh, these niches are quality domestic products. i hope that this is how it

will be and your proposal will certainly be supported. thank you very much sergey semyonovich please. good afternoon, dear vladimir vladimirovich, i also support the strategic directions that were announced today in the construction industry, which is really the locomotive locomotive of the economy and social changes in cities and towns. where people live, what they use every day, what is for them. actually, a few things are vital. i would like to pay attention, but pay attention. this is first. eh, what you already talked about about the creation of complex development, but, usually, complex development is understood to mean that the kindergartens of the school are communal. uh, in my opinion, after all, this problem can be looked at and needs to be looked at more broadly, in addition to social facilities, create more complex

jobs . walking distance decreases pendulum, igna- migration decreases traffic flows, and becomes more comfortable areas. after all, we have a complex development, in fact. these are big cities, but there are developments near moscow in moscow and in the same yekaterinburg. it covers there. there are one million 2 million square meters. there, sometimes in these, and in these territories, already 10-20-30 thousand people live. and, of course, they should already be considered as new cities with all the ensuing consequences, including not only social infrastructure, but also jobs, therefore, and what do you suggest enemy dianich said if he in the report, of course, it is necessary to support not only housing construction, but also commercial construction and the creation of jobs, subsidizing,

motivating the developer, providing them with land plots for this and creating such urban planning documentation that would already consider these large, and complex development, namely , like mini-cities, which we actually build from building up, and for the second moment, which i paid attention to, but a huge program that is being implemented on your behalf for emergency housing. she, of course, is definitely important, just, well, that's critically important. in my opinion. at one time, you supported the renovation program in moscow, and today we would already have hundreds of thousands of square meters of emergency housing. if not for this program, that is, we are planning ahead of time the exit of dilapidated housing. now it’s already in emergency and ahead of time we are planning to create urban planning documentation for complex development and this is happening much, well, it’s more comfortable for residents and for gas construction development,

because what happens when we relocate an emergency house, it is one house in the whole area, we grab this house, we relocate people, where god knows it, well, uh, far enough from the place of residence, then we proceed to the next house in the same way. firstly, this is more expensive, and secondly, it still leads to the fact that we already have a shaft already in emergency housing, which is not only uncomfortable, but also hmm is simply dangerous for residents, and according to the dynamics when a, according to that growth dynamics emergency housing, we see that its volume everything will grow, well, for objective reasons, because the industrial construction of the times of the khrushchev building there. and even already bldnevskaya, when a number of houses. in general, they were built, to put it mildly, not of very high quality; today they are moving into emergency housing. this is a huge area. thank you so much again for your support to

support this program then, in my opinion. still, it is necessary to gradually move from the contribution of emergency housing somewhere, perhaps, at least there, well, large cities, where it is profitable construction to more complex development, especially since such mechanisms have already been created, adopted in federal laws. etc. it is clear that it is impossible to do it all at once, but it seems to me that this is important. very direction. this is such a story, also connected with some kind of social justice, because we are now building a large volume. e jelly of the new then moves people who, well, more or less, but have a good income and leave behind a huge fund of dilapidated iron. ah, the third thing i wanted note. a law on the integrated development of the territory was signed with you. thanks a lot. this is such a development tool. uh, cities, well,

which, well, it’s hard to overestimate, here, and in moscow today about 10-15% of the territory is occupied, not abandoned, industrial zone, well, industrial zones that no longer fulfill their function. now, if we fly over moscow, we can just see from above that a significant area of ​​it is occupied by such depressive areas. and so we analyzed and introduced into this program the territory already they can give us, but in the future, somewhere around 35-40 million square meters of construction without compacted buildings and without removals of a new moscow there, and so on old from moscow . well, to give the development of the city such opportunities are in all cities, without exception, a huge industrial area. there are everywhere and many of them are simply not

in demand in terms of production development. but this does not mean that it is necessary to build only one home, of course. we also need to create jobs there, but i would really like to support my colleagues on investment budget loans. we even tested this mechanism in moscow, it works. well, very good fast decision making prompt review is just an effective effective mechanism, which is in my opinion. yes, we need to develop further. and one more question of principle, which was discussed by all the colleagues and we all in vladimirovich's report on mortgages. thank you so much for the solutions were adopted on preferential mortgages, a decrease in the interest on mortgage lending, but what i would like to draw attention to. ah. today we are talking about long-term

housing construction projects and construction in general in the country. hmm , short-term decisions on preferential lending to mortgage lending, and to a large extent leads to the fact that we generate demand within one year. this leads to the fact that we create tension in the market, the price increases, and then there is a decline. today is the same history, since people do not know what will happen in a year or two, the volatility is very large, therefore, even with preferential loans today . they hardly plan for tomorrow their uh their purchases of the contract and so on, that is, in order to provide us with stable housing and the development of the construction industry. we need programs, including those on mortgages, that would have a horizon of not one year, but three four five,

then the builders would plan their activities with a request, plan development, plan not if there were these jumps and price increases, it is clear that this is a complicated story. it is clear that it is necessary to calculate in such a way that the budget is balanced and so on, but nevertheless, but this would be the right ideological story. after all, this kind of program should be made long-term. they would be much more efficient and last. i would like to draw vladimirovich's attention. many thanks for the decisions that were made as anti-crisis decisions. we made a number of decisions during recent months. they are real, just real, and we were allowed to speed up decision-making, including urban planning policy, but, but many of these decisions were made before the end of 22, we understand that the crisis in the twenty-second year will not end and the problems that we are experiencing today in in view of the

sanctions pressure at the end of the year will not end, therefore, today we can instruct some of these measures to calmly analyze how they work in the autumn session. maybe restart. eh, longer term. it is clear that not everything is clear what is weighed, but nevertheless it would be nice to carry out such work. thank you very much for your attention to the industry. this is a very important direction. thank you so much. thank you for the prospects, here and evgeny vladimirovich just said, uh, the lack of planning for the use of building materials, equipment equipment, but now, if we set ourselves the task there, uh, to keep the construction site at least at the level of the current year. uh, next it's ninety-two plus million square meters, then, in principle, and now, if the building materials and technology of the future e at 10:00. she can generally find the numbers to

navigate here, and planning from here. as for me, as far as the use of industrial areas in cities is concerned, you are absolutely right. this is very promising. well, uh, city planning. uh, including millionaires built in the last century, based on the technological capabilities that the country possessed, there are so many territories, they are big. and they are often located right almost in the center of cities and, of course, and they need to be used, but certainly it needs to be done uh, in the form of uh, complex development, i mean jobs, meaning the transport infrastructure of social infrastructure, and everything that is connected with the normal life of a person. and so, in principle, of course, this is interesting and, most importantly, these costs will be minimal and we will leave. like you said, here, uh, here, uh, seal. uh, sergey

semyonovich is your birthday. we are with you we are with you congratulations everyone and spend your birthday as we see everyone in the workplace. i want to wish that everything is in order with you, both at this workplace and in the family. all the very best to you and your loved ones. i wish you all the best. happy birthday to you and all colleagues. i'm sure joining this, uh, yes, i reviewed your letter of yesterday about , uh, yesterday's date about. uh, by the way, uh, resettlement of emergency housing. in this case. uh, profsoyuznaya street, you just agree, yes, and with definitely agree with this. talk over, please, the address of ancho. okay? today i sent you this letter to your faithful thank you very much so colleagues, who would like to add something, please correct or from the regions, please, if there is something

shulgino yes. yes, please, please, thank you for the following, dear, i cannot but respond to the proposal of alexander yuryevich rustam nurgalievich and between the lines for participating in the proposal regarding the preservation yes 550 rubles. for 15 kw of power, this is 6 rubles. 1 kw but it is practically free connection. uh, so, although the actual cost is from 10 to 17,000 rubles. for 1 kw, but we do not offer this, because all our proposals related to the development of a new order and e, which means that the cost estimates are several times lower, but i would like to remind you that there has been no additional funding for the grid complex over the past 10 years only for the zone rosseti amounted to more than 100 billion rubles in nine constituent entities of the russian

federation, they turned to you, you understand, and with a request to provide budgetary support for programs improving the reliability of networks and such an order. you have, but so far we have received only from 90 billion to about one billion this year. uh, i guess he 'll get to dagestan a 50 from 50 to 60%, but ask the children. this does not give them a fortune, sometimes, in the regions, up to 70% of the investment program of networks is only preferential for those joining with all those negative points that alexander yuryevich spoke about and then downloading consumers who joined, this is generally about 20%, that is, uh, all these idle costs go. and in february, law 12 of the federal law was adopted, which gave us the opportunity to change the procedure and calculation of the cost of e-preferential underlining, again, preferential

connection. so, today he, uh, this decision has already gone into coordination, all of their people have agreed, except for the ministry of construction. we wanted to carry out an assessment of the cost of technological connection for the construction of individual houses, and in different regions of e and 100 square meters and 200 m². here is the preservation of today's rate of 550 rubles. it turns out that the cost, and those joining such a house is 0.7%, and the value of the house is higher in our applications. uh, it means to increase and it will be 0.6, well, up to 1% therefore, i would suggest that we return to this. at the very least, our deadlines, of course, are short until july 1, but vladimirovich, you will hear an honest, uh, honest assessment.

the state of the distribution grid complex in the country in order to stop further degradation. thanks for agreeing. uh, of course, the lack of additional financing of the grid complex should not turn into a problem comparable to the problems housing and communal services with water supply and sanitation networks. ah, yes, all questions. in this area, they should be economically justified and balanced. this will need to be taken into account when preparing the draft inverse instructions, please. dear vladimir vladimirovich dear colleagues, i proposed to change the mechanism for disclosing spark accounts. we ca n’t support this, let me remind you, what is a scroll , uh, those accounts, where our citizens keep money, and until the builders receive apartments, this is a

guaranteed demand, backed by money, and this is the basis of the mechanism. e hmm now, in order not to appear deceived equity holders, let me remind you that this is still the means of citizens. they are funds from developers. they must either get an apartment or they have this money. now. here it is to reveal, considered cool to pass. uh, citizens' funds to developers after receiving documents called zos. yes, the documents are a conclusion of conformity. built in facilities required design documentation before commissioning , while we watched and she is very different by region, there are regions somewhere that happens quickly, for example, the moscow region, somewhere by monday, but there are regions where between receipt. and this zoss and the decision we put into operation takes two and three months. and uh, if there's no risk involved. no, then in my

opinion. you don't need two documents. you already put on the papers, but here it is very important to keep the principle. uh, builders don't take money from people until they give out an apartment. i would really do, uh, support it, especially since the banks are within the framework of this mechanism. uh, represent-provide loans builders. now the volume of loans granted is 3,120 trillion. and the average weighted rate, because i think it is 3.93%, and it has practically not grown since last year and in our opinion. this is the mechanism that works. uh, the second topic, uh. i must fix the instructions here in the draft. uh, uh, already uh, expenses are different, uh, goals. it seems to me that it would be more correct to do this later, when it will be clear. the entire construction of the budget and all expenditures in order to just maintain macroeconomic stability and the third speech was made to fix

mortgage interest rates and fix interest rates on loans. if there is such a system to create, then it is necessary, probably, as a joke. i hope i will also fix the cost of an apartment per square meter that people receive, but uh, in our opinion. here is a fix. it will simply reduce the availability of credit. because if banks can't, uh, offer different rates more efficiently, less efficient developers more for loans, less loans also for citizens, then they'll just will not give loans to those for which they are now giving, maybe a little more high rates. we end up with just a decrease in availability. e for loans. i have all thanks. well, really a spark account and the point of their vision was to guarantee, uh, that citizens receive housing that is actually

paid for by citizens. this was the whole point of the reform that we did in this area is aimed at ensuring the interests of the people unconditionally ensure these do not allow anyone abuse their resources financially , therefore, i propose to listen to what has been said negatively by the central bank. so please colleagues. who else can? yes, please, anton and thank you. eh, there's been a lot of suggestion here. they're all expensive, so uh, i'd like a few. profinance to say and, as it were, a comparison of these proposals with real financial opportunities , we have money for construction on the road for housing and communal services in the budget, a considerable amount is spent only on the federal address of the investment program, about a trillion rubles and on road. the area of ​​a trillion is somewhere around 100 trillion

. uh, that means rubles annually. we are still adding money to raise the cost, e-e construction, and it was really said that 100 billion still need a rise in price, plus now infrastructure loans are entire programs for a million rubles, the housing and communal services fund is 150 billion . billion rubles such loans are subsidized, that is, uh, big uh, the amount of resources is spent precisely on building complexes and construction sites. you can say e really us a priority. but actually this is an important area, but not the only one, so uh, to say that more additional resources are being offered. here is what has now been said and that the materials are additionally about half a trillion rubles annually about a trillion. well, uh, big big funds

that need to be compared with the possibilities by which we now determine e when preparing the budget for the next three years. and we have a new task for the three-year period, too. er, it means that they have identified those requiring funding, so i would like to briefly go through the main proposals that were made and well, give me your thoughts. the first is the modernization of communal infrastructure at the cost of 150 dashes 300 billion rubles. in year. e at the expense of the budget, but our opinion. eh, if that matters at all. management and we agree with marat kirzyanovich that we need to work here, but should we do it only at the expense of the budget? yes, we think not. if modernization leads to a reduction in losses, this is true, actually the goal for such modernization, which means there are reserves. e in the tariff, which can be

directed to the relevant investment component, that is. eh, the tariff must be economically justified. uh, savings should increase investment, a component. in general, this is a good business project. especially in cities and therefore, budget components. yes , you can attend. well, in theory, this is a good business. e project, because there is a constant cash flow. and him. eh, naturally. necessary right. just means, uh hmm include the project next add- on program. loans of 250 billion rubles. we have foreseen a trillion rubles in the budget for 4 years. the program is just beginning. colleagues say, come on, let's do it before the thirtieth year. well, first of all, we are here for credit entities. we have a common debt of the regions. today is 2.4

trillion. we are also giving a trillion rubles, as we have just said. well, maybe four trillion, but what will this lead to, will the regions again be out of the situation, only we have cleared them of their debts again in uh, so, uh, we will lend only now with non-commercial loans, and with budgets, loans on the one hand, and on the other hand, in fact. this is public funding. because loans provide for a return in 15 years. now the governors are collecting loans. and what will happen in 15 years and no one thinks. that's because they will come. eh, well, god forbid, if they work, of course, this is a period. but how will they be? say goodbye at the expense of what resources? yes? uh, so this is not being considered now, so the person is very carefully needed. uh, it means to approach the new expansion, so the new is the program. we need to complete the trillion-dollar program first, and then we will see what effect this program has and we will make a decision. in my opinion. uh, i would have

done so. not completed, it is proposed to give it to completion. need to finish. uh, where can i get resources? well first, you first need to understand inventory. what is not finished? it's maybe, i don't know, there, 10 or five percent. here's a rack of everything mastered, maybe this plot should be sold or uh, so uh realize they are really somehow new. uh, so investors to consider the relevance, generally you're fine-tuning, so you first need to look. e means e. how to use this object, and then make a decision about completion, where does the money come from? here we are every year, some resources are freed up in our country somewhere they are not mastered, somewhere they are transferred to later, here is the first thing to direct, we release the resource for completion, we agree. here they are just to highlight. let's add 50 billion there

rub. building materials industry support fund. we have such a fund to support the industry, we have pumped 200 billion rubles into the ministry of industry. now this money is already being partially returned, about 40 billion rubles, but is it necessary to create such a fund under each ministry and now we are saying, let's fund the building materials industry. we have the industry development fund. it can also issue loans for building materials. that's why to bring entities, we don't think it's wrong, so there is, uh, means the industrial development fund, please contact there, especially since the decision on its mm, means capitalization, and it was rightly said that now, due to the departure of a number of foreign companies, the demand for our building materials will only grow, and this well, vice versa with a high margin.