good evening so please hear. hello , dear vladimir vladimirovich, i am batyr muradov

, dear vladimir vladimirovich, some time has passed since your last visit to turkmenistan. today you arrived in our country to participate in the work of the sixth caspian summit and today you met with the president of turkmenistan and the chairman of the hubbastakanta milegenshturkinistan, burlan, alikovichd, who turn 65 today. you congratulated a former colleague on his anniversary. in this regard, i wanted would. find out what value you are selling in your current visit to turkmenistan and what are the prospects for further partnership with the caspian states in your opinion? e, following the results of the sixth caspian summit, which is held today, the highest base, thank you, well, i have already said and i want to

repeat it again, i want to congratulate. e, turkmenistan e people of torkmenistan. with a choice with such a good one. uh, the new president is a young man, energetic, uh, with a brilliant education and experience already in government activities. we have good relations, good ones, he took the baton from his predecessor from his father. and we had a very useful good conversation. during his visit to moscow, we on the spot outlined a plan of concrete actions for the development of bilateral relations and began to put it into practice, as for the leader vyrubaleikulevich, he and i have developed very good friendly relations, and thanks to his efforts, a basis has been largely created for development of russian turkmen relations and cooperation continues along the line. uh, our energy companies and humanitarian sphere. in education, m-m in a in

transport. this is very important logistics in the modern world is one of the most important components of economic success and i must say that here we are after the official part. uh, we've been invited to an informal facility. uh, we had the opportunity to congratulate him on his birthday, of course, on his anniversary. but e percent, probably, still devoted 90 of the time. uh, informal conversations on the free mode about the development of e-cooperation in the caspian sea region. well, actually, almost everyone heard on but uh there were a lot of proposal ideas arose. now i will not anticipate all this, because all this should be reflected in the relevant multilateral and bilateral documents, but, of course, we were talking about hmm uh, oddly enough, not only about energy and logistics, but also industrial

cooperation, and in in areas that are undoubtedly of common interest to all countries, bearing in mind the main areas of our economic activity. we have agreed on the fact that we choose these priority areas, we will distribute among ourselves hmm competence and in accordance with these competences. uh, let's take the steps to line up. for such broad cooperation in the main areas, primarily in the high-tech industry. in my opinion. this is very important for the future and it is advisable to pay more attention to it. well, in our traditional directions. e, too, on energy in some other areas , too. there are specific specific agreements, in including the continuation of some of our contracts, the leadership of gazprom will soon travel to e, turkmenistan so we are very grateful to the leadership. e of turkmenistan for organizing this

event after such a long, so-called guinea vacation. we succeeded, finally. uh, in full format mode, work with each other. this turned out to be very helpful. so thank you very much. went under the sign. how is it more painful to punish russia both for jokes and about yours. sorry naked torso. they all distinguished themselves prime minister of canada let's take off our jackets, we'll be cooler than putin. you accidentally didn't discuss something like that at the caspian summit. and boris johnson also said that if the president of russia were women, then there would be no war, how does this apply in general. i guess i don't know how they wanted to strip to the waist or below the waist, but i think it would have been a disgusting sight either way. well, if you remember pushkin, i can make a mistake there in the words in detail, but, in my opinion, he said that you can be

a separate person and think about beauty, so i i definitely agree with this that everything in a person should be harmoniously developed, both soul and body, but in order for everything to be so harmonious. uh, you need to give up alcohol abuse from other bad habits. uh, exercise, sports, and to all the colleagues that you said, i know, personally, we are not having the best period of our relationship. this is understandable, but nevertheless, they are all people. eh, they are leaders. so there is a character. and if they want, they, uh, need to succeed, of course , but you need to work on yourself. but the fact that they talk about it, it's already well praised for it. now for the second part. and johnson, then, well, i'm not going to say now, if uh, to be, i just want to in this regard. recall

the events of recent history. when margaret thatcher decided to start hostilities against argentina for the foklin islands, a woman decided to start hostilities, where are these faklin islands and where is britain, uh, so, uh, and this is dictated by nothing more than imperial ambitions to confirm her persian status, therefore, i think that in any case from the current prime minister of great britain this is not very e not very. eh, correct link to e. to what is happening today, the nato met started and started somehow immediately very militantly, that is, for a start, russia was declared a direct threat to the security of the alliance, while stoltenberg. he admitted that the alliance had been preparing for a confrontation with our country since 2014. there is one more statement. e the prime minister of belgium that ukraine

must approximately win at the same time by all means, on the battlefield and this has already been agreed upon, allegedly with the authorities of ukraine you could evaluate all these statements. and how should we treat them now, we should treat this as, uh, hmm, as a fact that since the fourteenth year they have been preparing for some kind of active actions against us. for us, it is not exactly news. uh, that explains our determined actions to protect our own interests. they e for a long time they needed some kind of external enemy such, around, which could be, uh, around. i am a threat which could unite allies around itself. i say, first of all, about the state. well, iran was not very suitable for this role. russia suits better. we gave them such a chance to unite all allies around us in a new

historical turn. well, there is nothing new for us. uh, this once again confirms what we have been talking about all the time, namely that the nato bloc is a rudiment, the past era of the cold war era, we are always on this one, that they answered that nato has changed, what is it now most likely political union but everyone was looking for a reason and an opportunity. uh, give it a new impetus, exactly. eh, just like military organizations. well, please, they do it. there is nothing new for us here. and the victory of ukraine yes, we know about this, and the ukrainian authorities are worse with us better, at some point they agreed on something, then they from their agreements. sorry for my tone , we moved away, but uh, but a call uh, a call to ukraine uh, continue fighting and a call to refrain from further negotiations. this confirms

only our suppositions that ukraine is not the goal, and the good of the ukrainian people. this is not the goal. e of the united west and nato, and this is a means to protect their own interests, that is, by the hands of the ukrainians by the hands of the ukrainian people. uh, hmm, nato and the leading nato countries just want to assert themselves further assert their role in the world. e. s e to confirm e not leadership, but e his guidnemonism in the truest sense of the word, his own imperial ambitions. that's all. e, and. that's what they always said, uh about being unique, uh spoken and introduced into the consciousness of the world community. eh, the thesis and slogan about, and that whoever is not

with us is against us, this is all a manifestation of the same, the same, the same policy, there is nothing new for us here. and vladimir vladimirovich turkey, uh, renounced some of its beliefs about the entry of sweden and finland and somehow this decision will affect the relationship between russia and turkey and and what will russia do now, all the more, taking into account the latest statements, which voiced stoltenberg, and they say that your goal, but about that, e. nato were away from russia now , on the contrary, as it were, led to the fact that nato forces will be closer to russia, i know, these are theses. this is a false thesis that has nothing to do with reality. uh, our position has always been and is what i have already said, uh, about this in the course of our conversation today. e that nato is a vestige of the cold war, and it is needed

only as a tool of the foreign policy of the united states in order to keep e in obedience their satellites. nothing else here. no. we gave them that opportunity. i understand this, they use these arguments efficiently and energetically enough to drag their so-called allies around them. er, that's why it's on one side on the other side. as for sweden and finland, we don't have such problems with sweden and finland that, unfortunately, we have with ukraine. we don't have to lose real issues, not disputes. we don't have anything to worry about in terms of membership. uh, finland or about sweden in nato well, they want, please, only they must clearly and clearly imagine that they had not had any threats before. for them , now there are cases of deployment, there, of military contingents and infrastructure. we will have to respond in a mirror manner and create the same threats. uh,

for the territory from where the threat is created to us? this is the obvious thing. do they not understand this? everything was fine with us. but uh, now there will be some tension, obviously, definitely, so it’s impossible to repeat without it. if it will be created by us a threat, but the thesis that, uh, we fought against the expansion of nato at the expense of ukraine, and now we got it due to, uh, accepting sweden and finland, uh? it does not have any serious grounds, because for us the membership of, uh, finland and sweden in nato is not at all what the membership of ukraine is necessary for. these are completely different things. they understand this very well. they just throw a thesis into public opinion. uh, this uh, to show yeah, russia didn't want to, and now it's doubly so. no it's completely different thing, and we are aware of this report, and they

understand it, but in order to, uh, here, replace these concepts, uh, to show that hmm russia is not achieving the result we need. eh, it's on us and we are deceived by this, they do not lead. well, i want e sweden and let them join. you know, we have such rude jokes. just right they all entered, which means that in one place now in another they are doing it. let them go wherever they want. ukraine is completely different, which means that they began to make anti bridgehead from ukraine in order to try to somehow shake russia itself, e., they began to fight with russian culture with russian with the russian language. uh began to persecute people, uh, who feel like part of the russian world nothing like finland in sweden. no, it's a completely different situation. well, at least they do, please hmm