warns that anyone who raises the lgbt rainbow flag at the world cup will be arrested and sentenced to eleven years in prison. qatar is an islamic country. you must respect our beliefs religions and culture said government spokesman cutters. okay, by the way, not so long ago, very close to him in terms of views , a man who is now the president of the united states came up, that's what biden said, well, almost recently. this is about same-sex schedules in 2006. we will discuss this for three more weeks. i said all those gaybro crabs and us flag kites and god knows what else i just can't believe the american people don't bring. we already have a law to protect marriage, everyone voted for it. marriage is the union of a man and a woman, all states should lie down from the law. no one broke this law, no one challenged it. why do we need this constitutional amendment then? of men

and women, what game are you playing there? you? support gay marriages. no, i think, and after 16 years. i thought our administration put on gbt, plus more than all the past combined. yes, that 's exactly what i meant, so their idea of ​​values ​​changes very quickly when they come to power. i promised that the administration would be like america in every sense, with evil journalists. they just bully everyone. well , this can be further instructed here they began to scoff at the rhinestone, there are journalists asking difficult questions. this is not a gesture for the committee on foreign affairs. the just published paper on trading from the perspective. you say government will hold accountable those who violate human rights, as you are currently doing? it is in the relations of the countries of the persian gulf that these questions are regularly raised at the level of the ministries or countries that we meet. you understood, personally, i raised

personally. yes, your rep says no. what was the last human rights issue that you brought up with the gulf leaders. i'll have to revisit the issue at the committee meeting at a special time. well, tell us something you said about human rights. i definitely understood this question. come on, tell us. i'm just fulfilling my very last visit. but i can assure you that i raised this issue, i will write to you that kazan, you cannot remember a single issue on the topic of human rights, which was raised in a conversation with the leaders. i understood a certain issue on the topic of human rights when i was. well, you know, at least one i will not go into all the details of private hangings, but which i will write to you. green well quite obviously exactly therefore, when these nice people meet each other, it turns out such conversations as erdogan and biden. well, it’s just such a tangle of such a serpentariy johnson yes, and there biden is erdogan.

and johnson if you remember at one time, erdogan was very offended by johnson's extremely indecent stitch, so completely and now they saw it all together. this one is dishonoring us, he says, erdogan was pointing at johnson, what is that? is that a joke? calm down boris joke. well, nothing, by the way, the same girl who is so brazenly naked, she is on claims in all seriousness or stress that they are obligated to achieve the defeat of russia in ukraine amazing people we must do this for the sake of european security freedom and democracy long-term peace in europe is still

in ukraine well i think that this would bring a false peace the failure of the minsk agreements, what to ensure a long peace in the region must first bear the defeat of russia and then negotiate. by the way, when will you negotiate scotland will leave england or not? well, it's so worry dmitry than us this everything threatens. this is nato, which is becoming more and more the baltic sea is becoming the inland sea of ​​nato, that is, everything will have to be the black sea for us. how far can we? well, how do you say? e on the one hand, of course, it's all funny, but on the other hand, it's never funny, because it's strange, having nuclear weapons. and this is not only the united states and i am more or less calm. well

, how am i not very calm about the reality behind the nuclear weapons of the united states by memory, but the activity of a bicycle that demanded codes for itself access, there and so on. but, for example, i’m not very sure what will happen to the uk’s nuclear weapons . but in the hands of these wonderful people, in general, hmm, i’ll tell you this, they all say that they are about values ​​and they want to be percentage. this is their goal. uh, the goal of nato and these people who are going to nato is to have an alliance and in fact, this is an alliance of propaganda into propaganda, by the way, they are good at comparative rhinestones, which cannot clearly answer a single question. committee meeting and so, it means that you walk around like this against a smile with an anti-submarine zigzug and look at how she minted some absolutely empty speech, which makes no sense, it is clearly given out

by people who believe that politics is propaganda the second moment, which i would like to note these are people who live in inertia. hmm , in the forms they themselves invented. so they came up with a formula for a hybrid war against russia a. it was they who started her hybrid war against russia, and they, in fact, are inside this hybrid war. they have a choice now. what 's next for them to do? they need to intensify further. a hybrid war against russia at the same time more advisers more mercenaries somewhere more with uh headquarters groups, maybe already sending some kind of obscure business that is not british, well, most likely polish hmm maybe german units some special purpose, and so on, or follow the path of geographical escalation, but it

is absolutely obvious that they are following the path of geographical escalation. yes, the baltic sea, kaliningrad spitsbergen. mark my word, something will now be in the dnieper region and it is very dangerous. they are trying to go. they are trying to follow the path of aggravating relations with russia, but without going beyond the scenario of a hybrid war. well, in my opinion, our answer should be to quietly withdraw them from this hybrid war scenario, that is, transfer them to a real war scenario. and i think that you know what to designate individual, there is such a formula. here andrey won't let me lie in an enemy containment exercise by demonstrating one's own escalation capabilities. yes hmm on cats and it often works because they are really slaves of propaganda there. they themselves

believed in their propaganda, someone probably does not believe, but they launched such an inertial campaign , such an inertial tempo that now i look at them. hmm , and they will not stop. they cannot be stopped within the framework of political processes, but there is a third point. although they themselves fear that more as a result of sanctions that will not be against russia their lives are deteriorating so much that it can lead to destabilization in domestic politics and a change in the political elite, that is, one of the leaders directly said about this that we need to deal with the problem of our people in order to prevent discontent inside. yes, but u immediately received an answer that the most important thing, they are ready to negotiate and everything else, but the main thing, and defeat russia on the battlefield. here, mind you , this formula for victory on the battlefield is about a month old. she was sidelined what he said blurted out barrels, everyone said. well, this is probably barrel

blurted out. although you look at how she returned, she returned in a tougher and uh in the form of them, by the way , at a higher and more responsible political level, because the same listraz. this sorry, not her sheep, it is clear whom she represents, in contrast to the barali, but there is a third point. i would like to draw some attention to it. but what is nato. uh, if this is an alliance of propaganda, an alliance of pseudo-values, what is it? well, if you look at what they issued as a new strategic doctrine. this is very interesting because, firstly, there is nothing particularly unexpected there, except that we are not a threat, they are an enemy. to be honest, i thought that it would be directly written there that we are not an enemy. here they want to stay in a hybrid war. they don't want to get out of the hybrid war. here, as they say, neither friend nor enemy. and so here we are, so yes there are threats, but what did they

declare when they brought china there, when they started talking about china and china never once are located in the euro-atlantic region, under which nato was created. thus, we are witnessing a process of creeping globalization. nato nato wants to be a global alliance. well, i don’t even ask now where the un charter is. in general, this does not encourage, to put it mildly. let 's just say yes, yes, but look at the global political alliance for the propaganda of pseudo values, which inside begins to consist of regional alliances. look, a bite yes, a possible new alliance in south asia in india, the asian region, this is the british scheme yes britain poland lithuania ukraine romania that is, most likely we will see something, we will see some attempt to do this in the western mediterranean. and this will also be

a very significant change, that is, nato will become such a roof for regional alliances, a connecting link, of which there will be two elements. the first is the us navy, which will carry out the projection of military force. and the second is a loan for the financial resources of the united states that they can provide. mm help almost any ally in relatively decent, uh, sizes, but not all of them are as gluttonous as the zelensky administration , which is necessary in order to, well, like a little , uh, support the belt, there are five nine billion dollars euros. well, it doesn't matter what you give a month. well, of course, a month and weapons and weapons - this is not this, this is a separate box of cookies and a barrel to cook weapons. separately well, there are more modest people. and here is the reality. actually, there is a new world

here, a new world of american-centrism, which they are preparing for us, it will not work. don't know organizational resources most of all they have a shortage of not even financial resources and not what they have in the navy. there are certain problems of organizational resources. they do not have enough, but in principle, i still do not see the strength that i could. this is a relatively beautiful scheme, meaningless alliance uh, propaganda semitology, uh, controlling the global information society, brainwashing at the global level and very specific, you know, uh, specifically oriented regional allies, in my opinion, this scheme is worth thinking about. and this suggests that not everyone in america has lost, she’s common sense. it’s that the taluga was just empty, and this is a platform for propaganda to control the information society for the

cyber ​​war and the organizational base in the event of a big conflict in europe from which they they want to steer in every possible way, but at the same time nato is a billion, such a mobilization resource. well, as the population is not resettlement - this still does not draw, the population is always a resource. no. well, of course, yes, well, 44,800 million. well, i’ll just connect a trillion dollars right now, the enemy will add another 1.5 billion there, while no one has connected, while they are talking about us. here we are looking at the european, theater of operations, they like or dislike two million , they are doing well, excellent in conventional weapons, and the military industry is not working at full capacity, but do not deceive yourself, of course, it can earn on the full property. listen, they produce civilian planes there, how many there at 50 to 70 a month can they have a park

c-130 more than 2.500. well, that is, in order to understand this , one should not underestimate the enemy. yes, we have many small hybrid wars more profitable for them than one big reality. they can fight one big reality, they can fight more than one really big war. it is necessary, of course, for some time, as was the case in libya, therefore, to turn to america to provide additional missiles there, but their determination cannot be underestimated, and they are conducting their big exercises. i mean, well, you have to be realistic, that is, thank you. our army, what it is, but our army is 100, well, there are under 150 million people, so what a migration resource we see here. so i would be very serious about the 300,000 ready that they are here at the moment, yes, this is a serious number of all quickly responding, of course. well, this is serious, especially considering the length

of our borders. moreover, given that they have a serious aviation fleet. they are serious, so yes, if you send them all to thermonuclear hell. this is one moment, but what do they do, they try us let loose. they are trying to stretch our resources, for what? they need ukraine to see how we catch, what kind of weapons we have, to burn our weapons. we also understand the church very well. well, uh, i said you're talking, of course you can't underestimate the enemy. listen, on the one hand, 800 million people, yes, a two-million-strong army from an american , and so on, are well equipped, armed with conventional weapons and do not exceed them in all respects. we know how to have strategic and tactical superiority in nuclear forces. yes, everything they have the rest, when they started the second war in the persian hall, they quickly transferred the united states to the territory of kuwait and saudi arabia over 300,000 people, a huge number of tank missiles and nothing more.

mostly by air, the s130 has such a hercules called a double paddle 2.500, transport aircraft of such a plan cannot be underestimated. if when we talk about europe yes now the main burden, there is no doubt in europe, because they create around us and in in general, such a rigid rigid block, taking into account the entry into finland of sweden, a truly secular sea becomes an inland sea. and now, taking into account norway, it is performing through bergen. well, i know we are from kaliningrad, lithuania there and so on. we are on the verge of a big war. in the end, we won’t be able to give even the shesterberg of the leningrad region, but they are a global leader and a group around the world. this is so and correctly and not only with its military great opportunities financially. yes, now we are the president dad visited tajikistan now. yes, he asks to tajikistan well, right, he is the kidnapper , we said correctly, well, we want to see stable afghanistan, he said exactly there, why yes, very simply recently, it means that the

commander visited dushanbe. central means the teams of the us armed forces go to the middle east all three days asia afghanistan. it smoked, a very good last name. he said directly. in a short time, we have invested $ 330 million in tajikistan only for the training of law enforcement agencies, this is you know, taking into account the difference between countries. this is even more than they laid out $ 5 billion and cookies. well, he is in ukraine before i get there, no one forgot, they work in a tactful way. yes, now it means that information is coming. on june 24, president zelensky signed a decree appointing the former ambassador to tajikistan. so, you are the head of foreign intelligence of the security service of ukraine , a former border guard, they specifically note. yes and less rich operational experience. this is not a diplomat, but a person who will work 10 captive direction and right. we are now raising the issue. we can very well, er, mean the enemy turn out to be the difficult situation that the americans and their allies want. they want some other conflict on the wall, the second frost, so that they will be drawn in the most promising in a negative way, in general, the physical direction is separate and to the

tajik border, where there is a very dangerous trend, if the afghanistan-torukmen border is 900 km, everything must be said there, but a year in uzbek 170 is good, and in 1.430 km afghan-tashkent quite complicated, because the americans are now provoking a civil war in afghanistan, which is inflaming all the groups that are fighting with might and main - this is about the americans. i specifically named your last name today, but about the americans. they created a head structure in ankara otherwise they create a fixed territory, afghanistan but not alone. repeating group a guerrilla group cannot exist for a long time without support in the ground. they are looking for such support wherever they could help, yes, and to start they have a bet on what afghanity will be. yes, if he succeeds in provoking this conflict, we will be forced to interfere. we have the largest grouping of russian troops abroad. this is tajikistan, this is 201 basses and our aviation group, so we need to watch this very carefully. yes , if we miss the opportunity, the situation may be different . yes, they all work. i still.

i live like a family, here are the people to understand how deeply they work. here is one of the leaders of the so-called supreme council of the afghan resistance. this is the former one of the richest soils, he went to speak somehow, when our ambassador was a wonderful ambassador, by the way, he went extremely beautiful in a cabaret. he gave a last name. yes, it is, and there is muhammadr. it's more of a leader. balkh. such a very rich man. yes, he called the black business for drugs that come here to undermine our demographics were subject to our means of mobilization resources. he is one of the main comrades there, and so to speak, yes, but with huge funds, he sometimes happens a little further north across the beach. highly diplomatic, i say, watch this matter very carefully, so that we do not allow such this possibility the next moment from e, on which all this strategic raw material depends. and nothing come there, they need plumbing for their military industrialists. remember, i was talking about modern there at that moment zinc all that, uh, tungsten and so on. we must not allow to become physical raw materials from the territory with the state of the accident, whether it be kyrgyzstan or tajikistan

, or our warring state, like this make? how to solve it? i hope our great leadership thinks and understands what is best. we will somehow control this, than our project

. and now we are carried away, there, they have weaknesses , weaknesses are, among other things, a lack of raw materials, in general, as such only for the military-industrial complex. if we are there, oh, we are now like this everything in general, and if we miss, then that's all. this is the case. i just brought their stocks, which means that the critical plumbing for the military- industrial complex is 4.5 billion. now it is 800 million dollars. they will now accumulate. and where to get it, there is not

so much of it in the world, as we should think, where can we get it? we have a problem with chromium, for example, we have very little chromium in our country, we get it from kazakhstan, which means that we have to become almost 60-odd percent. to somehow work without chrome, there can be no metal without metal. there can be no tanks in aviation, something black and so on. it has to be done by someone. we must now strengthen our time after the sharp space, because in this direction the next moment. mystic yes, we have to deal with logistics, and really, when i hear from the road from china through the history of kazakhstan the way out, it means turkmenistan and joy, because why else would the chinese take out through this on such a road that they are planning this, and sometimes vladimir don't know cynicism impudence or something. china here is a beautiful road called the karakoram highway. at one time they built with access to pakistan pakistan has a large border with iran in such a damn legal way to carry. they even they paved the road high, which means high-altitude, yes, although you think it means books of records. how many

thousands of meters of walking people we had in cancer, i will now tell you which soviet road was built in the same area. yes, they were built through cindy, the territory must be given away to the chinese , they must be building something called gildigit batisan and access to pakistan, access to deep. here's to the water. why do we need this? you need to clearly now plan to count every penny and where to invest. and if we say why can't we tell you i will tell in the ninety-fifth year, i tried more as the head of the department to promote this idea, but where to promote it, then everyone pulled chubaisism went in full accordance with the full program, this is the road. now i looked not too lazy in 2018, the uzbek leadership. we also managed to unblock the road from turkmenistan to uzbekistan and uzbekistan kyrgyzstan a. this means that we can use such a road, including, therefore, along a certain path and also go to the highlands to build our own e, that means the rumskoe highway from e, asharov. she already has soviet engineers built and, moreover, she keeps year-round, and not like the

chinese for six months a year. i traveled this road in winter at an altitude of 4,000 m. it was a beautiful road, with an exit, please, through afghanistan, which means pakistan is an important life. i say again in pakistan and the population will withstand more than in china, and our future will not need to be dynamic. this is europe on the issue of delivering oil. gas, how can there be some industrial products, and we are of course interested in afghanistan and question. and what should we do to ensure stability there? here are the chinese, which means they are working on ainak, while the iranians are fighting oil. eh, means the iron deposit. and we why should i tell you? why? now, many will be outraged at one time. the soviet union trained professional personnel for the power structures of afghanistan, prepared a large number of otherwise these power structures. now they would want to build a modern non -partisan army. why don't we turn to tell? here, offer us training. search as hesitated wai so in the first taliban it means the main

military adviser, it means that the mulaamar founder and head leader, the taliban had a step on you, astana is the former minister of defense of the republic of afghanistan, a graduate of our course of shots drank well and ate what you need. you know our board was the man most of the major warlords of the movement. telemann of the first convocation were graduates of our soviet military teachers. why can't we take it? why do we train them on nothing to act in this way, showing, as our president of tajikistan, we are interested that there should be stable not to go there, it's none of your business. let them manage as they want, because it becomes a strategic direction for us, then we are now all in europe. by the way, there are some problems there. yes, but let's skip it. oh what not to do again. how did it turn out like that. we'll keep our eyes peeled for advertising.

yes, well, after all, since we opened this topic here in the first part, yes, and concerning the post-soviet space. and in particular. here is the caspian summit is currently taking place in ashgabat. i think that this is a very important event. uh, although uh, also deceive yourself. not necessary to a large extent. uh, the caspian summit is a way to keep the water area of ​​the caspian from the appearance of third forces there, but these third forces. it doesn't matter how one way or another they are trying to penetrate there, for example. the same, turkey, uh, through its panther projects both in the caucasus and central asia, uh. in my opinion, everyone is already well aware of this in this region. and most importantly, the

danger here is not only in the game of turkey itself, but the fact is that turkey is a member of nato, we have been discussing this fact for quite a long time. i say she she remains members. yes, but we were talking about whether to agree or, er, in turkey, about? participation in nato sweden finland er, many said. no, it won't work, yes, it will work out. in fact, it has already turned out practically. i think they 'll find a common language somehow. and this means a simple thing. all those spheres of influence that erdogan today, even if they conflict in places with americans. yes, he will receive everything in the transcaucasus of central asia. it is after him that nato will get it, and now it is actually a zone, so to speak , there is no emotion here about nato's actions. there is just a statement of fact here, everything that they do there. yes, they play their game. yes, so to speak, they tell us one thing there, they say another, so to speak, they are trying to balance, but in the end, remaining a member there is no all the sphere of influence that the turks receive and it will still turn out to be central asia and the caucasus. this is the zone of influence in the future

nato, therefore, as it were, all these formats are, on the one hand, useful to us, and this is important. yes, you definitely need it on the other side. we should just be aware there. uh, what actually happens here, by the way, if shakas says, in my opinion. eh, how is it? as it is, it's not a paradox. but our main partner is iran, not at all post-soviet countries, so to speak, because we have with iran despite the fact that we compete there in terms of sales. how many hydrocarbons is this? we have one very serious geopolitical interest, which is clearly perceived by both us and the iranians. this is a struggle against a unipolar world. iran in this case has a fairly clear position, it is both ideologically and religiously, as it were, justified and geopolitically. yes, and in this sense, too. this is what the seeds talked about in terms of developing our business projects, which would be very correct. let me remind you, uh, about this ill-fated corridor north, south, transport, which they have been talking about there for many decades, but which are still remains undeveloped. yes, they are doing something about it. yes, so to speak, in fact, in fact, this project has not developed into a full-fledged transport artery, and

there are many reasons, but one of the main reasons. yes , it stands in the fact that we just in our country have not found the optimal model for combining state policy in the economy and private initiative, because all attempts to involve a private company in this stumbled upon and we don’t want to say, they are beneficial to me. and we can't here earn as much as we earn, so to speak in a different direction. we won't be doing this . the same story in central asia. here i am, too, when there is talk about uh means investing in these projects and so on, as soon as these issues were raised. yes, yes, here in moscow they tried to pull up certain companies, these companies came and sent their delegations there. i myself am a witness in maternity hospital things. yes, yes, they wag their nose there, so to speak, yes, how would they drink it, have a bite and leave, and then they say, it’s not for us profitable. this is where investment is needed. there, relatively speaking, for decades. and we will not be doing this. this is what i mean this is what i really mean in order to develop effective geopolitics. we need to find the optimal combination of state policy in the economy and private entrepreneurship. i am completely against it. it would be like this one hundred percent state

planning, but, nevertheless, in the system of these challenges, which exist without state participation, at least strategic priorities are indispensable. they say the same the chinese, whom we often cite as an example and do not like. by the way, it’s just that they have the same missiles on a much smaller scale, they have a state-owned company. no, which, among other things, are involved in huge infrastructure projects. yes, there is private capital, everything else, but the policy is determined by the state. and so they know, well, let's call certain businessmen there, we'll talk to them and say, but now, don't you want to say so? vasya sing, so to speak, fedya and so on, to work there. vasya petya so say. well, i sent my people there, they will come, they will go there, they will come. no, we don't need it, he doesn't need it, but russia needs it from this. you are like this. so it is necessary to create a system that will do what russia needs, i'm not talking about how the topic that i love, uh, raise this topic of using economic factors for political purposes. listen, there is now being waged against us, well, an unprecedented campaign of pressure, in which there is absolutely lawlessness. i apologize for these words, as if yes, economic

measures of influence for purely political reasons. we have many such things, and have not learned to do. yes, i'm talking about the same notorious issue of migration. we are persuading someone somewhere, but in fact we have tools at hand. an impact that we are simply afraid to touch. why i will tell you why everyone knows very well, because it is very profitable for someone to earn money on this for many, many, many years. and then, when it is necessary, at least to demonstrate at least something, we don’t do it, we don’t do it, because the most powerful lobi groups are behind this, which, as it were, will give their interests to the lobby, there, yes, at a fairly high level, although in fact we could keep all these countries in one place, well, not all of them, but many of them in one place place, as if and so that they do not rock the boat at all. you are dissatisfied with something. you are against our policy. tomorrow a million of your citizens will fly out or leave from here. and at every leaflet you leave here, because your president is pursuing such and such a policy, and through this you can to arrange whatever you want. color revolutions , civil warriors, coups, which means a change of power,

you can arrange anything without spending. even the big ones don't spend a lot of money on this, but that other question immediately turns on here, the local lobbying group, some start talking. how so? we're ruining relationships. have you used relationships yet? do you think that you have some kind of relationship when countries that are completely dependent on us are completely some of them there, yes, in fact, they go inside the country absolutely anti-russian policy in the educational sphere in the cultural sphere in the information sphere and do not care. they wanted us why, because they learned in 30 years that no one from here will say anything, and no one will do anything, and moreover, will give help. why because you can sell some empty trinkets? yes, deputy, er, so to speak, such promises of conversation. i think that if we don't change anything here now, but now, uh, now is really the point where we need to stop. we often talk about it on other issues, stop holding on to those models that may have somehow worked. eh, last year. at least in my opinion. they did not work last year, but now they are completely themselves and

they lived habitually for someone in this system, someone from this system had to be. well, it means the opportunity to receive income, someone was engaged there. something else. now all this should be a thing of the past, all this requires a radical revision. in all directions, yes, and including finding this very one, so to speak, yes optimal socio-economic socio-economic model, which is absolutely clear, so to speak, and will make it clear where where is the state initiative, where is the private initiative. what can be done, uh, with these tools, what can be done with these tools, and uh, so on and so on, a few words about you. it is necessary, after all, that for the first time they spoke so actively about the chinese, that they put it in their documents, write off that they are not allowed. yes, of course, the main goal there is us, but nevertheless. eh, here. eh, quite a lot. they say from time to time that the americans will now try to make peace with the chinese. uh, and that means in order to put pressure on russia, they will find some kind of such a concept. this is the concept of not similar in any way, absolutely absolutely not like. these

are pure waters. hitting it is clear that they have, so to speak, there are their own gingerbread and there are their own, so to speak, their whip, but nonetheless. this is the system moment that makes china a potential target for i, frankly, i don’t really believe that nato has the strength to control the whole world. anyway, i think this the era is passing, but in fact, an attempt to do this can give rise to a lot of really conflicts, tense situations, and so on and so forth, but in general, and on the whole, to be honest, yes, the fact that nato members are talking about this, why they are talking in quite in my opinion, such in a disrespectful manner for china, this is also a factor that can be used. yes, including in our relations with china, they all the time say that china and russia cannot get closer, while they constantly do what russia can run away too. i don't have any illusions about the chinese. i absolutely, yes, i don’t even consider them close, relatively speaking, there are brothers there, allies and so on, but we have common interests with them. yes, they actually relate to vital things. yes, westerners somehow this situation is more difficult. uh, for them, for us, as it were, but at the same time they create, uh, some kind of

conceptual basis for rapprochement. i think to use it for propaganda purposes, among other things, i reached the goals, conveying to the chinese, these moments are promoted as undoubtedly as possible necessary. here are the chinese. no no no no it won’t be possible to pass between well, it won’t work, yes, because, roughly speaking, the defeat of russia yes, it will be, uh, it means that you and the next one are a banality, but you have to repeat it constantly, you know, like any propaganda, it must repeat one thing all the time and the same, because you will not be able to get through to american propaganda between the construction sites. and the last thing about what they do, what they will do. eh, after all, it seems to me that here our successes in ukraine, er, will have. uh, key to in order to demonstrate to them that we would not succumb to this pressure. we have proved to be quite stable, and we are achieving military success there, because in fact yes, there is not much to study, but this will also be a lesson for them. if you are going to wage a conventional war, it will not be easy for you either, and apart from everything else, the less time we give them for them to

, so to speak, turn around there , so to speak, line up there by someone, the better it will be for us. and we, uh, i don't i know there for various reasons, but nonetheless. it seems to me that we are a little bit so you know, in places we reassure that well, we have nowhere to hurry. no, it's all on the sly, yes, it's a polygon. you need to understand that time in this case is a very important resource, and this resource, as it were, yes. in general, it is somewhere comparable, so to speak, and now with the presence of certain types of weapons in your possession. so here is the confirmation of our words, the chinese began to troll everything, not only nato but already the g7 let's see. china should put pressure on russia to stop the war with ukraine claims g7 retars. and then uh, chinese official uh, the g7 representatives now believe that china is stronger than the g7 put together.

well, yes, by and large, this is how the g7 thinks that china has the strongest population yes , the population. you are right when you say that victory is needed on the fronts, but on the other hand, victory on the fronts is forging the trunk. as we were told in soviet times? yes, and here the question is in many respects and to the fact that we are mobilizing our war industry in this way, and to the need to develop new materials that are used, and work on the actual microelectronic base. if now it is hard to buy the development of microelectronics, as such, but i have a feeling that it is far from being and far from being moved everywhere. this regime, especially when we look at it, and the sphere of the humanitarian intellectual is so, uh, it’s just surprisingly some kind of legal ones, somewhat tougher ones are adopted there, but so far you can still feel such laxity, but we ourselves are the same, let’s be honest , we

also goes on top. we ourselves, as it were, well, not like you and me, yes, but this regime, when it says, well, there is a special military operation going on somewhere. and here we will live as we lived, everything will be fine and so on. we relax many, and give others hope for a return. you, as it were, do not give, so to speak, sufficiently clear, uh, clear guidelines. here's what to do, where to go and so on and so forth. and this and this creates a strange strange, so to speak, some kind of intermental, as they say, space, when on you know, like here here is one reality, here is another. yes, there is a third one. well, this is how it is possible somehow, it seems to me that this is how we somehow will not succeed. i understand now we are not studying. they do not want the light of mobilization, because they are afraid to say so, but what is it? it will get a negative negative reaction from the book in society, but, to be honest, i think that if it gives concrete results in the economic sphere, then the negative reaction will be limited. with this stinking circle, so to speak, our usual oppositionists. i think those who have become accustomed to all these years, yes, try to steer the informational

information in the country, since mobilization is a very specific military term. i would just take the better term composure, that is, not enough. here is some kind of composure of russia is concentrated. rather, this is what is missing. there is no point in announcing any wave of mobilization. they cope with military tasks and the peacetime army , plus a large number of adults, volunteers are now walking and behaving perfectly on question is another question, what is needed here more strictly. it's just really built. you need to be very careful now about what the seminary was talking about, right? that is, you need to look at what and how. where do we sell? what for? the same titan, the same uranus, that is. well, if we understand that we have been declared war not for life, but to death. well, let's take a closer look at what's going on. you have just now begun to deal with the issues of your own training of students. this is also a very important point, the question is ideological from

this is not going anywhere. here it will be necessary to work, please. well, sergei alexandrovich correctly raised the topic related to our asian rear, and even the caucasian one, but in fact, here we can again step on the rake that was advancing in relations, and there were meters in the baltic for 30 years. with our spineless soft policy, we did our best to get them to wipe our feet now. here, i am talking with colleagues who came from latvia, but this is a real fascist regime that is not afraid of anything. russia not afraid, latvia is not afraid. why because we have brought to such a state with this thirty-year policy and they, and, accordingly, our spinelessness, when we really give in, we all sell something. something you trade for yourself, by the way, about the baltic states there were purely corruption schemes. why not yes? yes? and in general, we are talking, by the way, many people say that

in general the embassy should be closed there long ago, because they don’t work anyway, and now the corruption scheme is less and less rolling, but i wanted to say a little about something else e come from afar, but returning to our main topic in 1988, a university professor from johns hopkins, and michael chansberg. he is now, in my opinion, working at the university of wisconsin in one of the here wrote a book. uh, the dialectic of oppression in zaire. the book is interesting in that it showed how modern states turn into bandits. he even has such a head of state as a bandit and it is shown, in particular, by the example of the force. structures that are needed here, well, in any state, yes, how do they eventually start to earn a living by banditry. for me , this concept was very interesting when i was studying. uh, question, kosovo and in particular. i can say with full confidence that the most striking example of a bandit state in europe is

obliquely, well, there are many bandits, and not only in africa, for example, and colombia and so on, but these are still such local small-town versions. actually. we are witnesses today. is e development process to create, and bandits, and global scale such here is banditry, and uh world players, or as political scientists would say, but political acts, eh. in 2012, the well-known russophobe zhezinsky published his book, and in my opinion, it was called the strategic vision of america and the end of global power, where he fixed the significance for america of a certain global project, literally a small one sentence the main task of the united states in 2012 wrote for the next decade is the implementation of the role of a global arbiter and mediator, as well as the main initiator of the

further expansion of the west as a single geopolitical designer, therefore and where china will be the united states yes, and where indonesia is already created and controlled by the united states. this is what they really think for decades mi strategically and if for this you have to destroy millions of people. uh, kill them there, uh, with various hmm tests, then these are only means for these here, uh, hegemons and hegemotics stopped in front of millions, and they will accept where they will prescribe uh, threats of demonization, where they will offer new absolutely ways of influence, but this is really vladimir vladimirovich, you correctly said when it was, so to speak, a limitation. er, this is not a political innovation. here is a geopolitical strategic vision of this kind. and if we look at the policy article of the

vice president of the united states, uh, harry truman, i was already scared. you say kamal harris is a person who can write. i want it right for the heart, which was published on april 24, 1941, in a newspaper, the new york times, and moreover, as we see 2 months before the start war, you'll see. well, just a mirror mirror. so what is it, and the person this citizen wrote. and if we see that germany is winning the war, then there is another war. started. yes, they are already planning a public space. nobody hides anything. for some reason, for many of our decision-makers, some kind of such revelations seem to be. uh, absolutely amazing hides nothing. so , if suddenly germany wins the war, we will help russia, but if russia wins the war, we will help germany and

let them help as much as possible. yes, this is what follows. quite right. i really should be written in the quote. i wanted to grind already. yes, you should help. not we will, but we should help, otherwise we should help germany hmm let them kill. as much as possible each other, but there are ending cases, in any case, i’m not victorious, we wouldn’t want to see germany win yes, but in any case

maybe a little less somewhere, after all, for some reason this figure was postponed for me, but there the yacht costs 100 million. it will be interesting. do you agree?

the summer will not be boring movies series documentaries cartoons

before me unique historical documents the standard of living of german citizens was continuously declining until 1918, in some regions people began to starve. one should be glad that such a good force was found, which for some reason would help disinterestedly like that. the whole experience of ukrainian statehood at the beginning of the 20th century, that the

directory, that the gate is a fan of skoropadsky - this is one big continuous caricature of skoropadsky turned out to be that he tried to sit between different chairs, the result is understandable - this is the fall of the main reasons for the betrayal of the fundamental interests of the people by the german and austrian occupiers. and here's another remark about the famine that western politicians are so concerned about. it is also ludicrous that the west has always evoked the voice of the political to remember being so worried. yes, they are so

worried that already, probably, the black screen does not climb the throat with rags of champagne. well, here it is, uh. oh, the 2002 war in africa, which went down not so much in history as the second congolese war, but as the great african war and, according to its results in 2008 , it was estimated that more than 5.5 million people died, including from hunger and disease, and well, i don’t remember that there was any noise in the west, and they were terribly worried about this and explain why the answer is very simple. while this war was going on. all these western companies, all these hegemons and hegemotics, they finally resolved the issue of the resources of the democratic republic of the congo and, accordingly, above all gold. and diamonds, therefore, this world banditry, which

we see today, and in brione suits, meeting in madrid with champagne lawyers, the noise that jokes e with each other is world bandits, for whom millions of lives. people do n't mean anything, so they're trying as much as possible to drag out the conflict in ukraine, contributing to the supply of arms, trying to threaten. can you imagine, here we are, kommersant comes out as a headline, you need to transfer military operations to the british isles, yes, or shall we say there? uh, it is necessary that yes, kapets, yes, but we don’t have zhivits. they say she represent what and there. that's all they can afford. yes? it's the free press so if it's the free press why our uh, channels, there and so on, it turns out that they're nothing. yes, they have n't changed anything. here i am, why is the problem not in

them, the problem is with us, therefore we should not disbelieve in the conclusion that we cannot believe a single word should not be served on any dishes there . it is impossible to agree with them. they understand only strength. therefore, we need to learn how to win and run not only on the ground in this sense, but we we are good at. one must begin to win in the insuvia game, which is for everyone for everyone. why not? well, if the bear will try to fight like a mongoose no, well, roughly speaking, for this you will have to lie to everyone all the time a lot. and then we lose ourselves, roughly speaking, so to speak, is it possible to defeat the devil with devilish methods? i think there is a temptation, well, you can't fail to constantly emphasize them. uh, hmm, these

bloodthirsty murder coups talk about it around the clock about it all the time talk but this again, not insulists. now they don't understand. why? for example, africa supports us when they start talking, they tell you, but, because we know who you are who they are russians have always been against colonialism, and ukraine sold russia betrayed her. therefore, we will be against them, they themselves are turned over, why am i southeast asia with you in the overwhelming majority for us. why are there middle middle east they are a completely different concept, the west we made a fundamental mistake. west never. to others, the west was honest. they live under the doctrine that kipling sang of the white man's burden. he, when he does not belong to everyone else, there are half-humans, half-beasts and they lead a big toy. yes they are they just live by their own rules and for them the g7 is a continuation of the colonial past. they don't see. what

's the problem. just in case, they sharpened japan , which, in general, is represented absolutely, but they, of course, decide everything. and you look, i agree with what to say. it just seems to me that the output is somewhat zero. there are notorious scary harari liberals, wrote a good book about there homo sappins. well, there is a lot of things where he is now, everyone is writing that any famine lately is a political issue, that is, enough food is produced in the world. the question of the distribution of this food. the west has always used the factor of food and clean water as a means of struggle and conquest. we say who won the second world war, sometimes they say that they have left tyranny. yes on the one hand, tyrants on the nobles, washed-up america or something, democracy was britain or something, democracy was france colonial kept britain getting up a terrible crime in the same india, a terrible famine provoked personally by churchill of his hatred of the indians americans, where in the same army there white and black soldiers could not go to the same

toilet, right? well, we never say this, because our leaders really wanted to be westerners. they popped right out. they say, we are yours, we are so ready. true we are with you and continues. this is what cannot be allowed. how else to play? in particular, in the caucasian and asian direction, it is necessary to play with political e structures with elites with business groups, and we continue to act on corruption when we came at all, but what can we play, what can we give. we must formulate this, that we give them to me. here is a topchik, we give out frantic sources of income in particular, which go here, we give stability. we can bring to these countries, including protection from radical islamism. we can let them solve their health problems, but in the nineties we left the work with the people and began to work. yes, you have to work with

people by different groups in politics towards. in addition, from the outside, based on what vasya, who finds power, tells us, we will support the cause. in general, our flow should be like this. we have brilliant universities to invite students to study, mostly small-towners study a little more for money , they still have a choice, so this is very important with the post-soviet space, not only with neighbors. you cut down the political elites there, that's what we should do, and here and who will form in all seriousness they ask me a question here in one very in a well-known institution, the teacher strongly opposes a special military operation. people are asking. what do you think, here they can continue to engage in professorial teaching or not, volodya turned to them to leave. yes, they themselves

must be a policy of an administrative decision. they will then go to court and restore. go. you are entitled to a street contract, of course, a house. why so, is this also a serious question? no, that's why we need to get it with us. we need to deal with ourselves. what are we talking about, what do we offer, how do we see the world? what our ends are so that's why we are on this transfer in particular. i agree. just like with hunger. why? for example, do they come to us ? because i don’t know that russia will take off its last shirt there, but will share it. yes, we will do this, and therefore africa treats us this way, and therefore azize is well understood, so the problem of hunger will not come from us. yes, but nevertheless, this underbelly, come on, let them say,

come on, this is normal. it's okay, because if you tell them, if you behave with them, like an american, like, but no, they will forget and they will not treat it like an american. well, like the chinese, we can’t behave like a russian russian, and we, with all the pluses, are very pleased with them. i don’t know how the chinese are treated by the depletion of the resources of the soviet union, the help of the infinite quickly realized that it’s not so difficult to consider it, but loves us. she says, when you come to us, that's right, we'll just come. we'll just give, we won't give anything. at least we 'll do it. do you propose to continue to be here so they come to our border. here on this one it came to our borders, because instead of working, but in particular the population of the baltic, these baltic are extinct. how many of them are ours and how many of them treated us well? we did not work with them, we never helped in germany, how many of our colossal

number that left? no, of course, to help, who put them among the people. we then were not balts. they have been us for the past 30 years. they have always been balts for the last 30 years that we i will do good for them. i'm not talking about the country. i'm talking about people. we gave them passports to him in general, to be honest, they are what they produce in europe and said, over there, please, i’m talking about power. no, i'm talking about russian-speaking people who are now throwing prisons. listen, you woke up, about which you know a lot here all these years to say the word russian correctly? what is inside the country, passing russian-sitting russian lying only not russians, only not russians. god forbid the russians are the most like, like the president speaks russians and the biggest divided yelling. the people and who lives there, there are some such incomprehensible. what to say? let them there on their own, right? the repatriation program is there at least, for example, the assistance program is the program for issuing these same documents. i know for sure, because i’m a lot after the soviet space, in general,

listen, people come here from central asia because they have them or the caucasus, because they have corrupt ties here and get passports, and the russians will come, he doesn’t have here gangs that sits in this very uh in the migration service. and he can't get a passport for years. why does he have no other historical homeland except russia, where should he go? no, you can’t, what are you, and you, and when we spoke and answer. and why pribal, and how did others start talking about the high cabin? we flew about the russians. i'm talking about russians. as a result, they began to say you know that we have a multinational country. we can't say that, you can't say that. yes, you can’t rake everything that you have now in ukraine, for example russian jews. well, what is it and can i say what is passing there now? listen, only the concept of the russian world is impossible for russians. you offend the chechen tatars there, we see, in fact, how this can work, because in fact it is the

russian world that should be promoted, as if, at least, this concept is absolutely working for the post-soviet space, at least. and that's okay. do not confuse the bridge here. you know, come on, we'll all be, as if not russian, so to speak, but as if it's not clear who. who recently. i said later, well, we are such beautiful europeans, even if you listen, even if you are a chechen, who fought in the nineties now, how would he say it. yes, we, too, are russians, we are russians not here for him, but for the people who were sitting in the offices, they were ashamed . that's all. okay. said advertisement.

recorded. i even worried i wanted to say what this person writes. i always write down for smart people now at one time they taught me what is memory? it's a good pencil, it's better, but i've listened to you. now. as a matter of fact, i also wanted to criticize, but then i thought, well, how do we live in general? how strange is this? how can she ever get along with anyone? well, i would not refer to this person, i would not refer to this person. the fact is that we ourselves here in this studio have repeatedly argued with me that they are europeans. here we are russia's europe, this is europe but different no, we are europe, we are part of europe, we are europe in general, many argued, then denied,

i do not know, but in any case, we have the entire infrastructure. i don't mean all foreign policy , only economic everything was fixated on the european direction to the far east how many times in russian history during the last 300 years we have tried to turn our eagle in that direction. i'll say putin - this is the fourth time. so pavel alexander began to settle there, well, convicts, they mastered something there in the decembrists. the great asian, the program of nicholas ii, yes. yes , indeed, they built one trans-siberian for sure completely sergey alexandrovich for state money. debts climbed, but the state was building for the money, which russian companies built signals there. russian entrepreneurs are the only thread, a small, thin thread that links the entire vast geopolitical space of russia in the 1970s. it was

bam, yes, a failed attempt. and now putin is trying to deploy very difficult to deploy what i'm sure we have 80% of in general in our litas in business in politics. yes, even in the armed forces. this european dean will go to vladivostok yes, i would not mind. i served there, whether you served another time , and now you will go to the far east for a decade to the far easter. i am the rector will not go. i would not have gone to us, it's clear i was alone, though via video link. it's february 25, then march twenty-fourth. and now here i searched the crowd mezhpohu. well, by the way, methodologically you have, or rather, i'm sorry. well, so be it. in general, in short, after that we went after 2-3 years, approximately every year, so you

the americans used the anxiety and began to actively introduce it into the nato documents in a look. here are the terms of the enemy did not appear here present danger well, the threat. there is a threat in american law. there is such a thing as a presentley danger, a direct clear threat. that's how we exist in china, that they brought it into the concept for the first time, indeed, the eighth concept was introduced by china, but how? as a system call, but it should have been considered, since last year they have considered the term rival strategic rival or competitor there a lot recruited philologists. no, i think we need to disagree, the fact is that the fact is that, according to your interpretation of the sanctions, the fact is that there is something dangerous now worse than it was in the cold. of course, it's worse, of course, it's worse, therefore, i think that it is our deeds and the like that make sense of any

operation, as the americans tried, our task now is much broader than just this operation. and it started. have us, too, until this operations. i believe that a turnaround took place in our foreign policy at the beginning of the 21st year. here with navalny this is all business. here there was a serious turn, when the foreign policy concept or the implementation of the foreign policy of its implementation at various levels from the embassies there to the consu. before before the ministry of foreign affairs changed when we really began to pursue a more offensive policy, that a more aggressive policy had been going on before. just a retreat. i think that we, of course, have not completely restructured, because here, please, the case of norway, the cases of lithuania are an incident. an incident that can be submitted for discussion by the security council. now a presidency albania from lithuania is there, it seems, now the chairman is now that he can agree, which

allows zelensky, as if by video link , to speak at the security council from the first, he must, well, this is a precedent, because he must be present. if they want to speak, then it can be put on the agenda, that albania decides this, no, not albania. but the fact that it violates, but it violates the protocol. maybe now really wait a little bit and not rush or rather politics, well, this is called an operation. which, which will turn the world, that is, between by the way, and western analytics is a problem here, their own production, which is categorically lacking. let's propose a project to the whole world, so to speak, of universal prosperity. well, hell no, we need to while the main project. this is russia’s victory, if we don’t win, only these things that such an environment is also important that all production be our own, nothing will come of it. i started with this, there is no contradiction here,

so that there is a victory there is necessary for change. here, to medium-sized businesses are directly related. why do i say concentration? why? i'm talking about changing how within a social society production industry credit financial system, of course we are by and large. now we are leaving the terrible self-imposed bondage, which we have been there for decades. we are returning to our path. suddenly realizing that us great destruction stopped. but this is a ship, you understand, you can roll over if you shift it abruptly, you need a steering wheel, i remember you must not swing the loot. i remember assad must go and this is like a spell from what seems to be from the mouth of the american president and the guaido, they appointed the president. but it would seem to be such a powerful bet. come on, the guys fit in so well, yes, that, well, it’s impossible to retreat. yes, nothing, they forgot and retreated, and so on, then no one will remember about

this ukraine, which was supposed to win on the battlefield, that is, all these words are lightweight, so they are afraid, there is nothing second message in finland sweden for everyone to even imagine that he really is. they will enter turkey there, they broke a bargain, there and so further. but actually, at that time, argentina iran applied to bx decides, and in south america next uh, so management declared us a threat, but along the way they overdid it. it seems to me that they overdid it very much with china, declaring it a systemic challenge. china. it reacted immediately in the person of the minister of foreign affairs , did they say what they thought? how many lives in vx counted how many lives and in nato they said that the guys here are from the world community, don’t say at all, and so on. poked. he just throws these things with his nose, takes everything into account, writes down and takes offense. that

there is once again pushed china to the union with us, too, nothing. let them stand until then, uh, as they say, they will run, when america will collapse them. well, the conversations that were shared there are ready, a lot of all kinds of jokes were broadcast. nowhere did they broadcast anything about what the whole world cares about, the whole world argues, well, definitely not african, not indian, or any leaders. all this will not give the impression

that they have really gathered here and demonstrated all this. these are the so-called unity that does not exist. well, ukraine needs to be deceived, we are dealing with people who have been deliberately fighting for the last 30 years in different parts of the world, of course, they are transferring large formations that use the arsenal of the air force of the navy, social doctrines, i say, if we relate to them sleeveless, that we are now their one left. we have such problems, that is, if it’s scary to imagine, no, i kind of begin to understand, you understand, you will now be now they will go to the baltic states, they are now at war, they are at war only with the help of ukraine, as we have repeatedly said here, but we can fight against them, who is scotland or what? no, we are fighting ourselves. and this is quite normal and we understand that we are fighting precisely with this coalition of nata. this should always be

borne in mind, it’s just that the levers that the soviet union had were correct, of course. so it’s necessary, because and how to do it, because someone boris nikolayevich yeltsin gave up everything in his time, and he easily destroys it in a second, but it is very difficult and difficult to restore, and there are methodically dozens of citizens for years in pairs only with tomahawks, what are you talking about 4.000 only cruise missiles and moreover, they lost everything. yes, these crete bogdans included, i say, 171 only killed 1,200,000 sorties compared to ours, which are not from ten. eh, therefore. now the army is now. yours is what he writes, there is a strategy, moreover, in ukraine it seemed to show in space that they are going to puff out their cheeks further and fight in the same way with deceptions and so on. and they really won’t give anything real to ukraine and they won’t help, and not here the very victory that they announced that it

must definitely end. they didn’t find the ways how they did it, what you were talking about tie us up and china completely objectively the americans use technology, china because the world is global and impossible eurasia is important to consider for the chinese to want to join there china turns on there is nothing to do here is an ideal option more russia india china and there is still to pull up the wounds. pakistan is generally doing well. well , let's look at the dkb first. virtual organization, it is necessary to form correctly. maybe two or three even more frighten china, which is pushed by our embrace boris well, we use the terms global local a lot here, and we must understand what they do not understand. unfortunately, the west today that there can be no local war with russia. it can only be global, and they are trying today, in fact, to

defeat russia with this local war, although this is actually impossible, that is, a war can be, that is, just in case, like napoleon’s yes in my opinion, we are knitting, and then we will see as a result of what they are fighting and who will bring it here to this place without an idea. in it, an ideologized space, our leaders think that this will work. there , as well as here, they are mistaken and very serious problems will begin. as a noun, on the contrary. just on february 24, they began to win. because ideologies for the first time in many years began to win, vladimir, you understand, i see the contours, as it were, of what we are winning, but still, for now, it fluctuates at such very. uh, dangerous game. i do not see the irreversibility of this process. you see, i would like to see him, because again we see how, well, a lot of forces today, which at first were stunned. today they quickly come to their senses and develop new strategies. that's what

it's about, that is, i still don't see that this is a victory no, well , irreversible, and therefore it seems to me that the ideology that today should just be worked out once and for all. that is, as soon as possible , that's for sure, because again, here to come, went crazy with this. i think this is a general trend. the current british elite, he generally stated that if vladimir putin were a woman, but he is not an obvious woman, he would never e start an armed conflict very much, and humanity would be a man. yes, he would definitely have behaved completely, otherwise yes, but there the man was margaret thatcher, so she doesn’t hesitate for a second to do everything that is necessary, but here’s the gender issue. uh, ben wolz would have continued. that's what vladimirovna zakharova suddenly pounced on i think that the real problem here is that the russian system considers it impossible. and i can be the minister of

charona himself, my vladimirovnas allowed my hair, of course, they live, in my opinion, he said that he would provide ukraine with nuclear weapons, just provide, that is, in the same hair, which is deeply convinced, like all, uh, british tire stalks that they can through the lip indicate to russia what and how to do, but at the end of this part? i would like before on advertising. something to say respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of other countries is one of the main priorities russia's foreign policy i personally fully agree with this priority. yesterday, on my morning broadcast , events took place that were regarded in baku as unacceptable. i apologize to the father of azerbaijan for the name because. it was the result of my personal political mistake, difficult time mistakes happen now advertising after it we will continue in the new composition. elizabeth features a live

broadcast in a different line-up about ukraine, we will talk a little later, because right now we have the opportunity. you know it ended in ashgabat the new president is a young man, energetic with brilliant armenian relations and cooperation continues and along the line. uh, our energy companies and the humanitarian sector. in the field of education. e, in. e. in transport. this is very important logistics in the modern world is one of the most important components of economic success and i must say that after the official part. uh, we were invited to an informal dinner. we had the opportunity to hear everything in directions, but there was

a lot. suggestion ideas arose if with these competencies and take steps to build such broad cooperation in the main areas, primarily in the high-tech industry. in my opinion. this is very important for the future and it is advisable to pay more attention to it. well , according to our traditional directions, and think about beauty, so i definitely agree with this in a person, everything must be harmoniously developed, both soul and body, but in order for everything to be so harmonious. uh, you need to give up alcohol abuse from other bad habits. uh, get busy physical culture and sports. to all the colleagues that you said, i know them all, personally, we are not having the best period of our relationship. this is understandable, but, nevertheless, about the beginning of hostilities opposite argentina for poklensky, a

correct reference to e on what is happening today, which could unite allies around me, i am talking about, first of all, about the state. well, iran was not very suitable for this. she fits this role in russia better. we give such a chance to unite all allies around us. on a new historical view, that it is now, most likely, a political union, but everyone was looking for a reason and an opportunity to melt away. only our assumptions about what hmm what what to further assert its role in the world. er, s, confirm to study with them, please, only they must clearly and clearly imagine that there were no threats before. for them now, uh, in the case of deploying, there, uh, military contingents and infrastructure. we will be forced to respond in a mirror manner and create the same threats, and sweden in nato is not at all like membership

ukraine completely different things they are prekratura that today entered the night in one place. now they do it in another way. let them go wherever they want and enter ukraine is completely different. so from ukraine they began to make a springboard for anti-russia in order to try to somehow swing. they protect the people who live in the donbass, they protect the interests of russia, ensuring the security of our country. well, we don't understand anything, do we ? i have already spoken about this many times, they will create such an anti-russian foothold. here are our guarantees we will constantly live under this only support. this is the first time i've heard of these ideas. i think that songs should be composed and poems written, uh, and monuments to them should be erected, they are heroes.

yes, of course, nothing has changed. i said in the early morning of the 20th, the fourth of february. i was told about this directly publicly to the whole country to the whole world, there is nothing to add to this and nothing has changed. and then, almost there, after a few did not say that the tactics may be, different tactics are applied by the ministry of defense, the general staff, where are the troops where to move? what objects to hit there? uh, what to do during this time, when uh, so several groups found there in the center of ukraine what should have been done in the donbas during this time, uh, there, uh, the kiev regime was preparing to protect these people and, uh, creating conditions that guaranteed security the blow itself. the most

complexes. eh, wow. uh, artillery, heavy equipment, residential areas in general somewhere else. well, just like that, no one in our fields and they don’t hit, as a rule. this is done based on the results of reconnoitered targets and i am sure that in this case it was all the same. well, they hide the equipment, which, especially from the west, is delivered to all sorts of hangars in the markets in the markets in factories. uh, in the shops where equipment is being repaired or put in order after a long period of distillation there from the same abroad, e does not carry strikes against any civilian objects of the russian army, there is no need. we have every opportunity to determine e, to determine what is where and in the presence of modern high-precision long-range weapons. we uh reach these goals, but uh, well, the details. of course, i know when i

will return to moscow. thank you very much. all the best. so now we will continue advertising after it in a new composition. the practices of various people involved in drugs to determine if others are hired, in general it is amazing. yes, when the president of the country threatens journalists. i

know that he watches all our programs and doesn't miss a single one, and it's hard for him. hear zelensky exhale and surrender at least to save the lives of ukrainians, which, by the way, do not give a damn about. now, under lisichansk, what is happening. well , just them. well, at least it’s already a nightmare , moreover, there, as i understand it, rodion will correct me there . there are already fights. let's go between, uh, there are terrorist defense and national battalions, because you have the same name that performs the function of a barrier of detachments. people want to surrender to them, they are shot in the back surprisingly, of course you have created a structure to harass the male population of ukraine rodion what is happening on the territory on the territory now? and planned clear you should congratulate you officially admitted, syria you know. i think the process has just begun. and this is very important, that is, it is important for us

that we be recognized by other states, that is, receiving this subjectivity. and now there was a statement from mida, syria, that is, the process of work, which we have already gone through that part of the stage of it. well, it's kind of a milestone. yes, that is, but the main one, when the recognition agreement will be signed. then. accordingly, we will be able to distribute congratulations and accept them. that is, i really hope that it will come to this very soon, therefore, it is important and important that they are recognized by the republic of donbass. and at least the struggle is recognized. our struggle is not to depend on the ukrainian regime, not to succumb to these, but these idiotic explanations, which means that not everyone believes zelensky, who speaks there with cries in front of e. well, here, he thinks, yes, it’s more right for everyone to read the notation, like it’s not enough, like it contains some of your little gingerbread, which go personally to zelensky personally to this elite that is there, that’s all, of course. that is. and who's next? yes, probably whoever threatens will threaten. if there is, this is my desire to live in the form of good

neighbors, to build normal trade and political relations there, and there will be no problems. well, it was not necessary for nato for seven. how many there are in 20 years to accept 14 states and now want to accept more and tell that nato is the bloc that does not threaten anyone at all. it's just e on the territory of the e lisichansk refinery on the territory of the volga region. and there is, but the enemy is the enemy, of course i say the enemy, that is, there the enemy suffered very, very tough. and here are the big big losses. and you know, when right now you have to explain this, but he says when it will be taken it will be taken when the initial conditions are first created, the preparation will be carried out normally, when everything is gouged. uh, here are the fortifications that were created there. and after that, when there will be a minimal threat for our guys, who will go to rake everything left with their hands, so that with minimal losses with minimal blood, because this is for ukraine unfortunately is, well, just spit on

their e, on their dead abandoned. listen. you have people lying around for 2-3 weeks, people just. i , that is, yes, that is, you understand swollen, that is, you absolutely understand them to us that we are christians, because we will treat these people with at least some respect, that we will take samples, and then your close families the dead of these people could be said to be your dead. that's where he was buried in this grave. at least it's possible to find this place. where are you where? where he died. uh, i don’t know which of your relatives is there, you understand? well, you don't care. you don't need it at all. that's why now the trend is developing enough. okay. i think that the day when it will be possible to say that the lpr is completely liberated from ukraine is not far off. naturally , we are waiting for this day, but the war will not stop there. we are actively moving towards severskaya. i understand that they are going to create another one there. uh, well, some kind of hmm, but some attempt barriers to stop the offensive, because

we can’t see it so well from here, yes, that is, it’s moving very quickly at the offensive site. that is, it is clear that here is a show-off by military standards for a serious capture of huge cities. this is a huge city. yes, that is, this is happening very quickly and very aggressively, so now he says that we have nothing there, if maybe not everything reaches us, because of this fog of war. well, in a quarrel, if anything, it was clear with whom to compare. with what city? no, this is a gurus, i understand. that is, i he said that this is approximately the whole people understood, that is, this is the size of barcelona - this is 100 m², the city of the city. this is one of the oldest cities in the donbass , this is the city of the motherland of donbass, dozens are located there, and i simply don’t know how to compare large e large enterprises in lvov square, well, unfortunately i didn’t look. yes, that's what area it is, the city is long stretched along seversky and now there is no lviv, so i think that it can be compared with any of the ukrainian cities. and you can compare understand, but this is really a big city and

it is quite mysterious for me that it is located in yes lviv north it is a new city, it is 58 years old it is very compact, it is compact four by four kilometers four by 4 km now the old town is arranged, of course, this it's a factory town. this is the city of chemists, this city was first built. e. severodonetsky azot and nearby built housing for workers, the city is very convenient in order to turn the fortress was an attempt. yes, well, or now, too, in this sense, it is very convenient, therefore, lisichansk is on top and therefore really, that is, it was simply impossible to take it head-on. that is, we would actually kill thousands of people if we just tried to go forward from severodonetsk and try to take this height, which is simply placed by the battery. that is, there it is absolutely not as simple as it seems from afar and as, well, you can imagine, so for me actually, that is, well, there are hills. there is, foliose heavy. the steppes, closer to the south, will go already. well, well,

yes, just again, to be clear. there, there's slipping around north, but he's well, you see, he's impaled on this degree. we live in the steppes of this steppe region, and therefore everything that is planted there and in the fact that everything that is now broken, when the operational space opens when you can already work a little humor, the children's people's republic is just yes, yes, that is, i am this it’s necessary, it’s not just 20 officers there. well, i think that it was there and when 50 senior officers were buried and all this was indirectly recognized, but ukraine did not officially admit it, so now they won’t even say it either and the nature of the war, that is, we deliver a lot of pinpoint strikes on command headquarters, that is, initially about a week ago. there was a population somewhere in the region of 7,000. how much remained unknown, the main movements therefore went not only from the south, where the main movement came from, but already from the northeast, they are also suitable. here, from the free side and from the side where you need to eliminate the main point, so just set it very simply. everything shows on the map so that yes

, you need to follow this, because events are developing, that is. you rumble canonate and sorry the smell that irritates the corpses is not heard here, but it happens there against the backdrop of heat and the guys perform very carefully, very serious, it was not like that. for some reason surprisingly warm after a few days. in general, the weather. i mentioned you from the very beginning of zelensky's speech on his business. he. well, first of all, of course, i am amazed, but i spoke. well we have monkeys me. well, it honestly surprised you. okay, in nato they have their own rules, but why on earth and why would the apparatus without the leadership of rags, would have come out there, i don’t know in a crown of thorns, so that something drips from the head. well, what if he is a satan to the fact that what he said there is to deprive russia of everything from the general assembly of the security council, he is out of all, uh, structures and so on, a good idea. yes, just a question. and

then what of that, he should stay and and when he began to blame russia for everything, yes. uh, well, and when he started to compare, in general, uh, at all these performances. yeah uh yourself. uh, with this old metro turnstile, or rather, these are all who demand money from it. i actually thought about it. it's like here a person thinks to you all his life, he is offended by the old, kiev subway turnstile for being forced to pay to go through this turnstile, imagine yes, well, this is a normal person. i mean, he thinks it's terrible. yes, he had to go pay for the subway pass. this is approximately the approach he is now demonstrating in relations with the whole world. he was talking all the time. you have to you have to, well, how about 5 billion a month you simply have to, that is, and even there is no thought to ask. west

they don’t even talk about ukraine anymore, neither ukraine should win, it is understandable that it will not win. we understand it all. here but here we must win anyway. and by the way, today there was a column in the times newspaper, and such a well-known venerable columnist, veteran journalist roger boyce, one of their most famous in international politics, where he is also directly the headline of this column. we must have re-arrived the time that we must transfer the war to the territory of russia, i emphasize not ukraine, we are britain and collectively, this very west, that is, uh, and they are calmly discussing how to carry out sabotage acts of terrorism on the territory of the russian federation , the task is now a question. but then we, russian russians, can transfer the war to the territory of great britain, it will immediately fall upon us. how can this people's right to choose their future, that is, to choose their own

the right to decide, to remain british, as he said, so wait. well then, what claims to the referee in the same way help. uh proud cattle of the city argentine to decide the issue is not on the side colonizers. on the side of those who want to make new colonies and so on, so the fight against this evil spirits is unconditional. this is right. you said that they say they emphasized how the defensive union is logical. if you defended someone somewhere there are results on swipe yourself the capital of afghanistan the capital of lebanon libya's capital, for example, serbia well swipe tell the

guys. we brought you - brought good values ​​​​freedom and will applaud. yes, they just hate there, because it is constantly destruction. thinks that despite what is there in ukraine, well, in ukraine it’s just a fairy tale somewhere between the droplets hints. if you are alive, then we are looking at something, and then we give weapons in plain text, that is, kill each other to modernize the turnover of the industry. kill each other, and some interesting things were written at the end. longer term , nato will help ukraine and support its efforts on the way to post-military reconstruction. that is, not now, and then, and then think, i thought, come on, well, let's compare it affairs, you will learn them today, how russia operates does not even look at the territory, because kherson is incomprehensible to the dacha of the territory, but there is a problem looking at people. we need to help restore it. mariupol begins bilateral relations of the city-brothers.

sign the agreement lugansk society of the century. yes , it works and so on. i see the military. yes, the military is already building obviously yes, they are building a housing complex of 12 houses with more than a thousand apartments. there is a whole complex of shops with pharmacies. delivery deadlines. november 1, i don’t even have doubts, because current technologies and the military knows how to build. they showed during the pandemic that they can do it and so on. that is, it will be done. and let's see. and what about the other side, except for guns, except for carrying tanks , nothing, at least, well, some kind of equipment for laying, so to speak, roads and asphalt, and then nothing irpin carry verbena. why is there destruction there, as you know, on a tour and scholz and macron and sandu well, guys, at least you treat both of them, that you couldn’t pay 100 euros, then you can restore windows, but maybe there are no windows, restores

the citizen of the window and the budget of these took not too lazy. i looked at the budget of a small town, there are 60,000 30 million dollars from state employees. i think dai did not look at who his sister cities were, but they should. yes, you are not gray. what if there is someone bigger there, the city of milwaukee in the united states of america in the eighteenth year signed an agreement brother if trouble, we are here for you and so on, milwaukee has a budget of 2 billion dollars. yes, krupnyak, well, 10 million. give it to your brother. yes, they did not come, they did not give anything. it's just bullying. and what is behind this, then they do not believe the victory of the ukrainian regime do not believe. they want to pour blood first to destroy all of ukraine like mariupol, then russia, together with ukraine, with ukrainians, with these ordinary people, will restore their own. and they want to get a double benefit. you understand, therefore, in this

case, of course, this is evil spirits and we must fight it, but there is certainly a question. the fact that the attitude towards ukraine already. well, how would you say something that is indecent, the same schwartz well , he just laughs when he is asked questions of guarantees, he just laughs, but it's yes, but he sincerely does it sincerely. well, we can even show it. it doesn't even need a translation. at this level, the german language knows all this, ukraine and if we ask you to specify, what guarantees for ukraine regarding the restoration of you at

the next italian show ask and how is the promise of the minister, italy, to restore the mariupol theater? i think they are in no hurry to call me again. after the last performance. they asked him the question how much money you will give, but still he was already laughing there, so to speak, who destroyed so ukraine irpin who shot by name, who stood for several weeks shelled russian steel, and then they shot at them, who turns out like that, the city grew up? well, this is not a woman, if our troops were standing there. and you and you came so peacefully, like a drink of water, hugs quickly met there, there the nation was hugged and met like gucci, so you shot those who hugged us and meet people, they are not here, ukraine attacked russia in general bryansk in the first place and green skiy,

so she goes 8 years. they both said that the war it's been 8 years the second moment on sorry, well, you've come to the stump. you just fired at the rpen. you destroyed it like that, well, just say that you shot like that. and teach, who fired you aviation, not aviation, like artillery, i will teach. you, by the way , a group of french policemen went there. and where are the results of the work obtained, if in 5 minutes they already made conclusions, and the entire progressive public shouted that the russians were to blame - these are motorcycles, this is not genocide. and after that, the french police arrived for 3 months of something volanded volanded and there is no result. oh, by the way, here is kremenchug, please tell me, who died? surname i don't know yet. well, who is more than

20 20 people who died. what is their gender and age? so who were they? there was no information that they were old-timers? this is plus the nature of the destruction. so zelensky decided to prove to everyone that the strike was on the shopping center and posted a video showing that the strike was not on the shopping center. zelensky is the great criminologist. he now he only studied as an addict after that alexandra kuts shows a funnel, which generally polite people say at all, and not inside this shopping center. and by the nature of the destruction, it is clear that these very ammunition were detomized and the center was blasted and a fire started with the blast wave. this is such a destruction of my character that you have bottles that are not beaten and rashchenko ’s kharigs, you still know it’s a shame for jurisprudence,

because i’m a lawyer, the former chairman here, i’ll say, so briefly what he says, this indicates that he has nothing to do with to has no jurisprudence. why are you an addict? you will say no. now you already suspect there are signs. here. when i sent them, i made the decision to send them for a forensic psychiatric examination, and then a complex one. and that's how it needs to be somewhere. yes, i knew that we have the concept of signs that this movement should be, so to speak, well, glassy eyes look at some point, that is, there is a suspicion, in total, in order not to condemn a problematic person, he sends it to specialists, so i agree with the chairman of the hungarian parliament here it is necessary to carry out an examination of the advertising of the best as a complex.

about today's conflict is very interesting, says the american political scientist john bersheimer the conflict in ukraine to summarize its causes those who are friends with the us

impact kisses the main architect of this fateful choice on the obama administration trump and biden stepped up this policy at every turn, and america's allies obediently followed behind washington. despite the fact that the russian leader bus yesan dali understand that the entry of ukraine into nato would mean crossing russia's most contrasting and red lines the united states refused to come to terms with russia's deepest security concerns and instead moved relentlessly towards it to turn ukraine into a western bastion on russia's border the

tragic truth is that if the west did not seek to nato expansion into ukraine it is unlikely that an armed conflict would flare up in ukraine today, and crimea would most likely still be part of this country, in fact, washington played a central role in leading ukraine along ways of destruction strikingly short-sighted policy towards ukraine is an absolutely sober analysis of the real situation. and why did it happen so? but you know, i'm volodya the key question,

of course, was the introduction. i’ll say exactly switzerland finland’s attempts to join nato mail and finland need to step in. why attempts, because in fact, no matter how much stoltenberg knocks on the table, there is a certain procedure that still needs to be ratified, but i looked at how, uh, insidiously, erdogan is acting, yes, today we we sign a communiqué. and tomorrow, please, give us the terrorists, but for me this is not even the main thing, for me it is not even. the main thing, it seems to me, is the main conclusion that ukraine should have drawn from everything that happened there, with what ease western countries refuse certain of their obligations and easily surrender those to whom, at least, they promised protection, immunity there, and so on. . i'm talking about the kurds, whom they can extradite tomorrow. here may in the history of our country. i mean in ukraine, including the moment when he says no, but what, well, this is a contradiction to our

national interests. well, what did you want? well, this is the situation today. well, i think no one is even in favor of this. in fact, they simply believe that the west will forever stay with ukraine and will finance unlimited support with weapons. and it will continue indefinitely. well, there are people represented in higher and residential authorities who actually see the situation this way. although, she is absolutely not now i want to say a few words about this, and about it, it will probably somehow intersect with the expertise that we just heard. i here e listened to zelensky who says that in fact the problem is the conflict that actually arose. it arose, in fact, due to the fact that russia does not recognize the sovereignty of the former soviet republics well, that is, ukraine, latvia, estonia, there, and so on. that is, they do not recognize russia. well, it seems to me that the problem is just the opposite. russia insists that these

countries were e subjects so that they independently decide conflicts caused by what is what is actually what? ukraine lost by transferring control of the country to third countries, which in fact govern ukraine to its fullest when ukraine makes a decision based not on its national interests, but on the basis of the interests of third countries, this causes a conflict, because that country becomes unpredictable. well, for example, who could imagine that in 2014 ukraine could start a coup d'état with understanding of those consequences that may result from this e, coup and those economic losses that ukraine suffered after these events. well, how could you imagine it? yes, well, here, such a level of cooperation and so on. that is so many enterprises people. all this. i do n’t take any historical things anymore as a doctor. well, who could imagine? well, he did happen. and it happened as a result of which, as a result of the fact

that part of the ukrainian political elite, in fact, gave interests, in fact state and in fact. pass them on. eh, she transferred her subjectivity to third countries, in this case, at least for the moment, these are americans and british. here they are in full control with this country, it is difficult to build some kind of relationship with such a country, you know, it is difficult to build some kind of relationship. here's the problem. it seems to me that this is exactly what it is. and again, of course, zelensky raised the issue of, uh, financing again. give us money again. give us 5 billion. give us weapons again. give us uh, 5 billion monthly funding. well, for some reason they seem to have such an idea. you say he's being so arrogant. so cynical in relation to europe and in general, in principle, well, because he believes that in fact he renders a very great service and one must admit vladimir's daughter in the

world it is difficult to find a president who would be ready to provide such a service at the cost of his own life population is difficult to understand. go such a person, and he believes that he renders a light service, which should be paid, so to speak, with elevated anor. he thinks so, and there are certain reasons for this. well, because it happens so that a country that, in fact, at the cost of the lives of its own soldiers, defends the interests of another country or an economic association. well , you still need to look for such a president. we managed to find it. i would like to highlight a couple of aspects, like everyone else, of course, i also constantly monitor not only the approach, but military operations, but i also recently discovered related operations, and operations. e. strange e activity and new vector in the work of cipso in ukraine, the center

of information and psychological special operations, if in the first months they worked with the same audience as before. eh, that is, well, the target audience was. this is our fifth column. and those who are closed to it are talking about millions of people, in fact. uh, plus they used every every tragedy that happened in russia and so on. that is, they just rocked the situation now, uh, in the course of hostilities, waiting. uh, we were driving, other events. and those are operations. they don't wear crowd there, then there is no crowd there. they sit there, there are 150 people there. in each center there were four left. actually in ukraine, uh, there are analytical departments there, and it has been quite good for many years. and it's not hiding right there with the british working with them. they also have very serious experience in this sense. it's a designed operation. knowing what will happen, i can predict, uh, the next attacks from the side of the chain on the day

when it will be officially announced by our side that the lugansk people's republic is completely exempt throughout its territory laws. they are preparing for this, which means their task. e smear the effect, uh, and they do not work for their audience, and not for our audience. they work for our country, primarily for this target. but it's not sharpened. and here they have a huge, really huge amount of these transmission points, that is, specific people, not necessarily even bots, a and hmm, a new audience with which they began to work. this became obvious in that story with saury and tairo. i don't remember hmm these are ours hot patriots. and this is very dangerous, because this audience is the locomotive of public opinion in our country, these are people who believe, uh, who are confident in victory, who believe in the military-political leadership, who are always

ready to support, and they chose this particular audience as targets. that is, when there was a story with this babichs, they untwisted it. why do we pay attention to failed operations? the tragedy of the telegram channel begins for you, when it begins to seem to you that the entire network on which you signed really there, but in real life it’s not at all, so now, well, i’m really saying go out on the street , start talking, yes, people don’t give a damn about this at all. they don't know it. but just inside a small layer, hysteria is dispersed, and when it turns out half of those who are dispersing tantrums, these are people who have long been sent in this story, playing patriots but strongly in ukrainian. therefore, this is just such a specific topic, in part. i agree with you. strange as it may seem, tvs are outlines. and moreover, he himself repeatedly said he returns to tv and people in general climb into it when there is a

question. are you commanders in chief? well, here you really determine who to change for whom. here , each of you needs to come up with something to explain, because who are you? you know all the nuances, all aspects, or they say, but you tell us, seriously. now, if you imagine the forty-first year forty, the second forty, the third where does it speak from? well , explain to us why did you do this? because i will say so. now he went through an exchange of 144 for 144, israel for his 1 maybe 200 palestinians give away because our price. that's how long it takes for ours to return. this is important, because it is important for me that our pilot, that our soldier be returned home. this is what worries me. and when the military solves military issues, this is one moment, and when the sofas solve issues. this is a completely different moment, and god forbid, when sofas

begin to affect the military, it is very dangerous. i agree with every word i myself regularly talk about this and i myself have repeatedly stated that all information wars they end with the fact that when the real fact appears, you can hold companies on the ground as much as you like, but no one can go around the tanks on khreshchatyk. summer will be interesting, i agree. you ask if it'll be fun in the summer, 'cause now throwing red roses on the windshield . my fiancé's car. victor will be

exciting. it was heterogeneous, in the summer it will not be boring. serials documentaries cartoons

it went on for years, at first there were few of them, then the indoctrination of the population became more for me. this is a necessary condition before any military operation through education through the

media each year 13. you all noticed that you started jumping. and they, in principle, came to the process, prepared from the consciousnesses, trained by western instructors of monstrous crimes against people. donbass russophobia turned out to be a profitable business of this phenomenon. it would never have reached such proportions if the americans had not invested hundreds of millions of dollars in it. europe pretends not to notice that in ukraine already has nazism. he is not born, he is. before me are unique historical documents, the standard of living of german citizens was continuously declining until 1918, in some regions people began to starve. one should be

glad that such a good force was found, which would somehow help disinterestedly. the whole experience of ukrainian statehood at the beginning of the 20th century, that the directory, that the gate fan of skarapatsky is one big continuous caricature, the trouble of skarapatsky turned out to be that he tried to sit between different chairs, the result is clear. this is the fall of the main reasons for the betrayal of the fundamental interests of the people in favor of the german and austrian occupiers.

but i'm not talking about specific topics. i'm talking about the fact that a war is going on against us against our public opinion, and in this regard , it is necessary to develop certain countermeasures, but it is impossible.