but i'm not talking about specific topics. i am talking about the fact that a war is going on against us against our public opinion, and in this regard , certain countermeasures must be developed. it is not possible to offer that it will resolve itself.

offer to plant. by the way, in a separate case, well, answer me, i think i'll hear you. well, look, yes, today they say why you changed those, yes, we gave away those who have no hands. why is there a threat here? they no longer represent those who were given , obviously do not belong to the category of serious criminals, who would have to be judged there. considerations also humanism is important, that in their received back. and you need to listen and read the guys who are serious poddubny sweet cat, well, professional people, they are those who are mom, well, the extreme thesis in this regard. uh, first of all, it seems to me, uh, well, i personally do this, but it's clear that i'm not enough. uh, it is necessary to develop, after all, certain standards of perception among our public. hmm, people need to be told about this. well, the easiest way is

never to react emotionally to stuffing. it is necessary to pause, leave, drink coffee , come back and again, so that the mind turns on. and i advise everyone this, by the way, it works, but if the downside is not only the development of certain methods and they need to be explained to people, but there is also such a phenomenon. that is, we do not have it, like a talking army. uh, it seems to me that our army, uh, it's time to join some kind. conversation with society, because now i'm sorry now, just god forbid as if you imagine, i imagine, the third year. here we have a talking army, and whoever told him something, and ta the side found out our plans. and i'm not talking about plans, i say, char. we have igor evgenievich kanashenko , lieutenant general, who clearly states, we have military experts who come and explain the military to be silent military

experts - they say this at their own peril and risk. eh, that's their personal opinion. e me, i think that the army should find one two three people who not only report on our victories, but also answer people's questions not about plans of course, but of course i, i'm sorry, but this is an option to lose any war. because you are giving such information to the enemy. please note that not a single army in the world behaves like this. you propose, on the contrary, that is, not a single army in the world, not army wars, ever behaves like this. you speak not outwardly, like the arresting officers, but for the military to say no, no, no, no, it could be people who are already in reserve. so lieutenant colonels come in, speak only question. they must answer questions. which? here you are under the cat to

a professional society - who formulates it? here comes the society, and what will it ask. and why are you storming in this way for how many days or now? and a person should come out to explain, but because here we decided to use this tactical task. and here we have applied such a technique, and there is a trick in this, so that the other side would record everything so carefully and watch, which means that such and such was used, the aspiration of such forces and means was started . yes, yes, yes. no, i'm not suggesting doing it with a topographic map on the table. eh, it's possible do more uh, general more neat. just god forbid you have seen, for example, that there is also the american side in iraq in afghanistan, any at all, what is the matter, can you imagine? yes , we recall that 45 until the forty-fifth year, this is a victory, in general there was almost informational silence. i know, maybe not by chance, maybe the soviet times were not fools, and moreover, they won, what are we talking

about. but this is an attempt to play around, this is an arrest, and then leads to grave consequences. that's what the army should do solve that combat mission. yes of course, what should people do who are responsible for the information components they do. yes, in ukraine there is a talking army in the front, how many times has he already leaked? yes, the operation of the ukrainians, of course, how much did you help us here? yes? he really fought information, about which he reminded one correspondent for some time in one warring army. i turned it on and it was clear where it is in real time and something flew there. therefore, this is not necessary. here, first of all, everything must be taken into account for front, everything for victory and society with society, we also say it is harmful for the front in society, when tantrums begin, if you want something, take machine guns, go fight, well, this is

naturally provoked, because hysterics are served. giving in to hysterics, take the machine guns. go fight. do you want to help? go stand at the machine. and if you decide to lie with your fingers, then you serve the enemy by pretending that you ask important questions and the hysteria is dispersed within a very specific circle, so people should not pay attention to this they receive accurate verified information from kanashenko twice a day, where there is still such a thing twice a day, an indication is clearly given more. here, where , how, that the supreme commander-in-chief regularly says, how the operation is going. what are the goals of the task, what will they be solved? the leadership of the lpr dpr each has its own information service , the war correspondents work brilliantly the great school of military correspondents of the all-russian state television and radio broadcasting company, excellent military correspondents of komsomolskaya pravda, excellent military correspondents, our colleagues rt first ntv channel, we give information

clear clearly adjusted, which does not allow the enemy to use it to their advantage. this is the information army. and society, judging by the president's support rating, believes us, because we are telling the truth, and we are showing the truth. and that's when these games begin. but let's now here we know this is such shooting. yes, when slavyansk passed and instead of taking machine guns you go now to die for your deeds and pour shit on everyone through your lips . this is not a russian officer. that's all therefore, the ego is very important here, but love for the motherland well, at least your answers, now you can cut out and launch information networks on the internet, which is my personal opinion. i see a huge difference between the decisions themselves, especially last year's atlantic and this

year's. and even if there is no doubt, because when this year, after the g7, biden came to spain, the picture is as follows . here he is at the top , it doesn’t matter, there are diets. he is like, but he is the main, the whole the rest of the punks. he said, like this, and everyone walks quietly. and whoever does not walk, quietly, he sits quietly on the pope. everything is gone, no one else, no leader of france, no leader of germany, no leader. there is one person who will go to spain who says i have decided to increase the budget. i decided to put so many baltic countries so much more so much in romania, everyone else understands, gennady is the nato secretary who jumps and stands and says he won. that's what russia wanted putin wanted it to be a kilometer now got twice as much hurray hurray hurray

he is i as an official i understand him, he is an official, he decided to start negotiations on joining nato yes, ugh, step on them, you need to go there so that he says everything, i started to read everything, and now in this situation in this situation, ukraine as for me, it lost a lot and lost. unfortunately, thanks or vice versa. for the first time i will say this by the action and especially by the conversation of president zelensky, the supreme commander-in-chief, who addresses the participants latitude, how are you owe 5 billion. here you owe this, lithuania here more listen, you were invited there, you say, and you tell me about ukraine and talk about the problems of ukraine and tell the head of the minat when vladimir zelensky says that we are offended by you, because you did not give us weapons before the start of the war. you didn’t give us an iron dome. when the war started, nato didn’t accept us at all, it

didn’t give me a candidacy, they didn’t give me anything, so ugh, you guys are sitting on it, everything has already changed. there was still some noise last year. this year everything is quiet, and then someone spits and wipes. they're his legs, right? so here it is in the nomenu, he won’t even feel what will happen to him, and for the first time i felt sorry for president zelensky, he is, in principle, a young man. i recommended him a lot. he could do a lot of things. especially this is the bad babble of a lawyer who has not graduated from some kind of bursa. i, i, i understand what forensic science is, i understand what nonsense it is talking about, and finally, vladimir aleksandrovich stop scaring russian journalists, you understand that criminal the case that was against the same solovyov here is responsibility and prayer. and those who attempted on me rose on you. well, what is it to talk about the fact that russian propagandists are guilty. you say the guilty one is the one who missed the missiles something else. well, nonsense you do not sit. and that's the main thing

here, why i'm so emotional, it turns out, that is, you know, here's vladimir, i say the situation has changed, everyone is on the alert, and vladimir aleksandrovich is still rolling, but they will give him time, but there is a person in ukraine, we turned to him the attention that writes. here he has a telegram channel. the commander-in-chief of the armed forces of ukraine is zaluzhny, so he writes. i take quote from his telegram channel. he writes to me to everyone else he says that i had a conversation with the head of the joint chiefs committees so that the us has a mile mark and the chief of defense staff of britain, admiral tony rodnick, here he had a conversation with a person reporting to the father - this is about 4 days ago russia 4 days ago launched 50 l rockets from different platforms 3 days ago 26 mole of missiles 2 days ago 40 for the past joke 12 years, otherwise the battles went from the north of kharkov

to kherson along the dnieper, where there are fights then what is the situation in donetsk now, that is, the person reported the situation was correctly informed and partners leaders, that god is the usa britain received from them our tsuvu to carry out commands, everything is clear, everything is clear with the guy. he is so military. what army does he serve in and now, look here, i’m saying why they gave the command, which is bad for ukraine i said about zelensky and now about ukraine as a whole. this person says that we are together we are with but we are not talking with britain. i'm not him together he's definitely together and we fight we say where we apply, how we apply we get intelligence we get operational data. if that is, we have a team. we are inside the team, it’s another matter that he understands this, and he conveys this to me to the ukrainian society, well, the ukrainian society, which is fighting part of these rodions, you are talking about the fact that there are

settlement with corpses and so on people and especially them mother's wives, who still receive, they cry and they say, listen to tens of thousands, perhaps there will be 100,000 people, citizens of ukraine, peasants. they just die, they just die, because some die untrained , others die because there is no technology or technology that comes new, it doesn’t can write off. well, something else i can still give a technician, but they write off. well this is who the same ukrainians are dying. and here is the problem of ukraine number one, when i hear from mr. zelensky today. mr macron is aging him, that the war will be before winter, and we must help. what kind of winter, shorter than six months? how many how many these people will cross out

tens of thousands of hundreds of thousands of citizens. ukraine understand questions hang in the air. i perfectly understand how they speak in front of me. i would have a month come, someone will elect someone. and i do not believe that the western elite, uh, will change. the people will not change it i believe, because after these successes in joining nato in sweden in finland they will say, we took them they do n’t interest me at all. i am interested in the fate of ukraine and the citizens of ukraine, and no one gives an answer to this question. well, maybe they say fight. well , maybe tomorrow we will find the answer. and the expansion of nato, a special military operation, even about the health of the leaders of the g7, vladimir putin gave a press conference following the results of the caspian summit in ashgabat and the questions concerned, of course, not only the machine. they asked the russian president and what answers sounded anastasia will tell in detail the firm is not the best period, so the russian president

characterized the current relations between russia and the g7 countries at a press conference following the results of the caspian summit, the head of the russian state was asked to comment on the events of another past in germany themselves. this is the g7 where the leaders were ready to undress no more, no less, like to the waist, to look cooler than putin's quote did not work. i don't know how they wanted to undress to the waist, or below the waist, but i think that it would be a disgusting sight in any case. well, if you recall pushkin, i can make a mistake there in the words in detail, but, in my opinion, he said that you can be an efficient person and think about painting your nails, so i definitely agree with this in seagull everything should be harmoniously developed, both the soul and body, but in order for everything to be so harmonious. uh, you need to give up alcohol abuse from

other bad habits. uh, exercise. to all the colleagues you they said, i know them all, personally, we are not having the best period of our relationship. this is understandable, but nevertheless, they are all people. eh, they are leaders. so there is a character. and if they want to, they, uh, need to succeed. they will definitely succeed . well, you need to work on yourself. and the fact that they talk about it is also well praised for it, i remind you that the brilliant idea of ​​​​undressing belonged to the british prime minister and it turned out to be not the only bold assumption made by boris johnson at the summit in bavaria, so he said that almost verbatim. be russian president with a special military operation woman. in ukraine, an assumption would not have happened that contradicted not only common sense in world history. i just want to in this regard. recall the events of recent history. when margaret

thatcher decided to start hostilities opposite argentina from the lenin islands, a woman decided to start hostilities, where are these islands and where is britain, uh, so, uh, and this is dictated by nothing more than imperial ambitions to confirm her persian status, therefore, i think that in any case from the current prime minister of great britain this is not very e not very uh, the correct reference to uh. to what is happening today in parallel with the caspian in madrid, the nato summit continues, which also started with frankly anti-russian statements by the head of state called for treating them as a fact that the north atlantic alliance was preparing for active actions against our country and this preparation, including prompted moscow to protection. of their interests is a vestige of the past

era of the cold war era, we were always told something that nato had changed, that it was now, most likely, a political union, but everyone was looking for reasons and opportunities. uh, give it a new impetus, exactly. eh, just like military organizations. well, please, they do it. there is nothing new for us here, a call to ukraine, uh, to continue hostilities and a call to abandon further negotiations. this confirms only our assumptions that hmm that hmm and ukraine is not the goal, uh and the benefit of ukrainian people. this is not the goal. e of the united west and nato, and this is a means to protect their own interests, that is, by the hands of the ukrainians by the hands of the ukrainian people, nato members and the leader. ananata

just want to assert themselves further assert their role in the world. e with confirm e is not leadership. and er your hegemonism in the truest sense of the word, your own imperial ambitions. that's all, the north atlantic alliance sum - it is already obviously planning to further expand in line for the entry of finland and sweden at the same time how the russian president noted that moscow has no territorial issues with helsinki and stockholm. as there are no problems similar to those existing in relations with ukraine, however, given nato's rhetoric , it is hardly possible to completely exclude the emergence of such problems in the future. we do not have such problems with sweden, finland, which, unfortunately, ukraine has, we do not have a third of the real issues or disputes. we don't have anything to

worry about in terms of finnish or swedish nato membership. they must clearly and clearly imagine that there were no threats before. for them, now there are cases of deployment, there, of military contingents and infrastructure. we will be forced to respond in a mirror manner and create the same threats to the territory. where are the threats coming from? us. this is the obvious thing. do they not understand this? everything was fine with us. but uh, now there will be some tension, obviously, definitely, so it’s impossible to repeat without it. if this will create threats to us, and the thesis that uh, we u fought against the expansion of nato at the expense of ukraine and now we got it due to the admission of sweden and finland , he does not have any serious grounds, because for us the membership of, uh,

finland and sweden in nato is not at all the same as the membership of ukraine necessary. these are completely different things. they understand this very well. if we talk about a special military operation and its goals, as the russian president emphasized, tactics may not change, but the liberation of donbass, the creation of conditions that would guarantee the security of our country, is still the key task tactics can be different tactics proposed by the department of defense. genna where troops, where to move? what objects to hit there? what to do during this time? when and so several groups found there in the center of ukraine what should have been done in the donbass during this time, uh, there uh regime, kiev was already preparing for this. it has been for a long time since 2014, so some distracting actions were carried out there. i am, of course, the supreme commander. starts still did

not finish the academy of the general staff. i trust those people who are professionals, they act as they see fit to achieve, of course, the goal, and the ultimate goal we have designated is the liberation of donbass from the protection of these people and, uh, the creation of conditions that guaranteed the security of russia itself, that's all. and uh, the work is going smoothly rhythmically. well, as you can see, uh, the troops are moving and reaching those lines, uh, which are set as a task at a certain stage of this combat work. everything is going according to plan. so, uh, well, there's no need to talk about timing. i never talk about it because it's life is, uh, it is real things to adjust to some deadlines. this was incorrectly asked to the head of state. your questions about the events in the city of kremenchug and about the speculations that the western media are so enthusiastically engaged in in this regard, no one just shoots or hits our fields, as a rule, this is done. uh, done according to

the results of explored targets. uh, and i'm sure it was the same in this case. well, they hide the equipment, which, especially from the west, is delivered to all sorts of hangars in the market in the markets at the factories of e. workshops where equipment is repaired or put in order after a long period of distillation there from the same abroad. e, not on any civilian objects of the russian, the army does not carry strikes , there is no need. we have every opportunity to determine, uh, to determine what is where and in the presence of modern long -range high-precision weapons. we, uh, achieve these goals by military personnel who perform combat missions within the framework. special military operations put their lives in danger, and many sacrifice themselves for achievement of the set goals, and as the head of state emphasized. they deserve their names