russia is the main enemy report from the scene the story of a noisy divorce how relations with nato developed materials of our program allowed to ban the new storm in american politics the attitude of weapons, yes, the right to abortion. fly fly petal through the west to the east through the north through the south return made in a circle, a magic spell from a fairy tale by valentin kataev, a flower-seven-color, is the best illustration of the way the north atlantic treaty was organized after the cold war, a new one was adopted at the summit in madrid a strategic concept that calls russia the direct and most important threat. painful wandering around the countries of the world, in search of a mission completed, returned having made a circle during the

existence of the north atlantic alliance, its ideologists distinguish three main stages; the first lasted from the formation of the bloc until the collapse of the soviet union. block was supposed to be activated if containment did not work and was committed attack after the outbreak of the war in korea , the strategic concept focused on ensuring the defense of the territory of the member states of the alliance in the event of an attack, nato was to begin with air strikes, and then move on to land and sea operations as needed, it was emphasized that air strikes would use all types of weapons, including nuclear weapons, even then the united states sought to push back the line of defense. as far east as possible, closer to the iron curtain. this problem was solved in may fifty

fifth year, when fe became a member of nato. so the collapse of the ussr was defined by nato ideologists as the beginning of a new stage, it lasted 10 years until the september 11 attacks , during this period two more containment concepts were adopted. the concepts of cooperation and security were added to the defense, the russian nato council was created at the same time the expansion of the alliance to the east began, the third stage came after the september 11 attacks. nato announced that the main resources of the organization will be directed to the fight against terrorism and for the first time the forces of the alliance operated outside the euro-atlantic region. the events of this year brought out the accumulated mutual hostility and finally allowed nato to consolidate the confrontation with russia to the final level. yes, and among us who believed in sincere partnership with the north atlantic alliance, even in dietary times, the hammered

wording of the aggressive nato bloc still rebounds from the teeth of most fellow citizens. why be surprised the alliance was created to confront the ussr and played a pivotal role throughout by the end of the forties , the brilliant historian vladimir olegovich clung to the origins of the cold war at our request. the printed strategy of the west in this cold war was precisely the expulsion of the soviet union from this sphere of influence, not the return of its border. 1941 is better than 1939, but it was supposed to be done without a big war by the soviet union by all means except war. in this sense, how would the ussr solve the fruits of victory in world war ii , the balance of power, the intentions of both sides were, in my opinion, as follows, but in the west, stalin and in the west intelligence diplomacy proceeded from the fact that the

soviet union would not be able to. even if he wants to unleash a big war in europe over the next 10-15 years, he does not have the resources , the will, the readiness to fight. stalin, for his part, also did not believe that the country was threatened with an immediate military attack. from the side of the west, from the side of the newly created over the very reaction to the creation of nato was rather calm. i would say it was a statement. mida was a statement by the soviet government, in which he said that this an aggressive bloc, that all this is going on in violation of the un charter and so on, but the soviet leadership did not take any retaliatory measures, especially of a military nature. although, in general, the balance of power, if we take its military dimension, was not in favor of the soviet union, therefore, the threat, in general, of such an attack, it could not be written off, especially

since the united states itself was introduced from debate and even open, and the need to e preventive atomic strike on the soviet union , especially after testing the first soviet of the atomic device of forty-nine, when the united states appeared, as it were, a small window of opportunity before the soviet union acquired delivery vehicles and received a sufficient number of nuclear warheads, there was a temptation to pre-empt this preemptive strike on the soviet union, which, of course, aggravated the situation and created here such a situation of military military danger in this light. that's all soviet. post-war foreign policy was aimed, as it were, at solving this main problem. how to mitigate this threat creations, of course, military in the form of nato, and here are two

directions of the main e-e of soviet foreign policy. the first is naturally creating a counterweight. its own military-political bloc, which would be at least comparable better than nato in terms of its resources, and in this respect, e, work begins immediately after the creation of nato at the end of 49, the cmea is created, as we know, economic integration begins, as many as fifty the first year, the already well-known conference at stalin's with representatives of the socialist countries, at which he sets the task of intensifying the forced militarization of these countries, strengthening the combat readiness for the next 2 years, hoping that by that time the united states will be bogged down in the war in korea and new opportunities are created in europe, with such military military superiority, however, in addition to building up their own capabilities. the soviet union did not stop diplomatic efforts, the second

direction was. naturally, the weakening of the enemy, that is, the weakening of nato, as soviet documents and internal benefit. it was necessary to shake loose or break up this bloc. attempts were made, not without success, to limit the military presence of nato in some areas close to the soviet borders. such as norway, denmark, which pledged not to host nuclear weapons and american military bases, the second task was to prevent the remilitarization of germany by west germany and its entry into nato, because in moscow, as well as in washington, london was well aware that without a german military machine without the german military economic power. it will be ineffective there. well, here are the known things. this is the fifty-second year, even under stalin, the famous proposal to create the withdrawal of germany on a neutral basis. here is

how the method repeats the prevention of the integration of west germany into nato. this plan did not pass, but the proposals were interesting. in the same, in the same spirit, more ambitious fifty-fourth year after stalin, in connection with the council of foreign ministers, a regular meeting and in connection with the summit meeting in geneva of soviet diplomacy then prepared a whole package of agreements of proposals that would, to some extent, weaken this threat from nato. well, firstly , it was proposed to essentially create a collective security system from europe, this time with the participation of the united states. in addition, it was proposed to conclude between the warsaw treaty organization and nato were proposals for the withdrawal of foreign troops from foreign bases from the territory of european states to the

disengagement of forces in the center of europe soviet diplomacy supported rapatsky's plan, not unknown at that time from these proposals little has happened, but the very idea of ​​​​creating, uh, a collective security system in europe, if not in exchange for nato, then at least as such a shock absorber for this bloc confrontation. this idea has been preserved and will be restored in the sixties and will lead. in general, to create. e of this security system based on the osce. do you know, when ukraine first applied for nato membership in 1954, being a ukrainian ussr, then the soviet leadership came up with a move and sent a note to the usa to great britain france, the ussr is ready to join the bloc and create a joint security system of the ukrainian and belarusian ussr, which, at the insistence of moscow

, accepted won as sovereign states in the forty-fifth year, they also instructed to request membership, a win-win calculation will be accepted. we will separate from the inside will not be accepted. ah, here. you didn’t accept what we created then and created the warsaw pact, then a lot more happened nikita sergeevich khrushchev was all bar-keeper at the famous plenum of the central committee who dismissed khrushchev from the post of first secretary. companions, among other sins, accused him that under him the country three times, without serious reasons, found itself on the brink of war. the united states and nato meant the suez berlin and caribbean crisis, but more on that another time. let us now recall the history of a less distant, amazing time when nato and i were considered strategic partners. the fact that nato broke its promise not to expand after the cold war is constantly remembered. but the disputes of the

mid-nineties. diplomats forgot how to react to the expansion, they believed that at least reduce the effect by agreeing on restrictions hence the idea of ​​​​a founding act, russia is nato, but there was an opposite point of view, any joint document legitimizes expansion, then it can no longer be stopped with it the council on foreign defense policy led by sergei karaganov spoke. as a result, the act was signed. since then, the number of members of the alliance has grown by 2.5 times. the founding act of nato russia was signed in may 1997 in paris, then the side announced that they did not consider each other as opponents a joint russia-nato council was established whose task was to form a higher level of trust in order to increase the security of each other and all countries in the euro-tactical region. the act

stated that nuclear weapons would not be placed on the territory of potential new members. alliance, the military potentials of the parties should be at a level that is necessary for security, taking into account international obligations, including the treaty on conventional armed forces, and in europe, the document also stipulated that additional combat forces will not be permanently stationed on the territory of the new members. the alliance was confirmed by both sides. that it is the un security council that has the primary responsibility for maintaining the international community? peace and security, which means that nato can only act under a security council mandate, where russia has the right to vetom the first crisis occurred in 1999, due to the bombing of yugoslavia, and in 2003, without sanctions from the un security council, the invasion of the united states and its allies into iraq began, nevertheless, russian nato consultations continued, but relations sharply

worsened in august 2008 after the shelling of tskhinvali and the subsequent forcing of georgia to peace in 2014 after the coup d'état in ukraine and the annexation of crimea to russia, the nato russia council ceased its work. we talked about the atmosphere of that time with a direct participant, viktor mikhailovich zavarzin. the brave military leader became in 1997 russia's first chief military representative to nato, now he is a member of the state duma. mikhailovich, you stood at the origins of our relations with nato when we have ceased to be opponents, now we somehow already remember this. even as a mirage, some, as it was then. well, it was like this, firstly, our country was weak, so to speak, mildly and militarily in economic terms. and, of course. nato understood all this. of course, they may

not be complete. i’m already saying this from experience, then my analysis was not carried out to the end, as in that film, they said they were pissing, but they understood that let’s go for rapprochement. we are in prem, then we were in the ninety-fourth year. this is prm. partner. yes partnership of the world, there are many states, including russia now, here yevgeny maksimovich primakov's contribution is very large. by the way, i was present as a soldier and worked on the last lines of this fundamental act, when it kind of half hugged her and said, well guys, i'm leaving for the night with her to straighten these questions. so let's have a drink then amazing man. he is an idol for me. i 'll tell you the truth, the diplomacy of all of you will remain so. and so we signed this one, so it was, so it was signed in paris, uh, so they called me everything is in me, he says he was summoned for a conversation here the day before and on the 77th day he was offered this position

of chief representative. i didn't really understand what it was. it's really all new all new. it certainly is. it was uh, to be honest, there was such a little confusion, but then it was all there. and uh, so in the month of may was signed on the boots of harversalan. uh came to this yeltsin in paris and all the states of 16 states signed this act, what is envisaged about the act. now says the act represents it's mine personal impressions of recollection, of course. this positive document came to a positive and again the role of yevgeny maksimovich. what 's obvious here is just, uh, the good thing is that we stop becoming enemies to each other. leaving for some kind of partnership goes into a discussion really into a colloquial discussion. uh, we take into account all positions, the role of the osce is given, and definitely in peacekeeping, conflict

resolution , etc. permissions, and so on and so forth, and it is clearly stated in the act of non-deployment of nuclear weapons of states that enter into an asset, it is not written in the act itself that they give a taboo on entry. well, we agreed in the agreement that maksimych. so he agreed that, uh, hmm, they would not deploy significant forces in those states that should enter. and so we leveled it all , leveled it equally, and then we realized that this was an empty conversation. but at what point did you understand, we understood, uh, so, uh, almost in 2 the year when the three states entered the last ninety-ninth year. this is hungary czechoslovakia and poland czech republic uh, so czech republic right? they entered, they were

going, it was immediately obvious, at first, they were there representatives of some kind they first sent, especially the pole was such an amazing wonderful kind. i was surprised the general, even we were there, well, we talked in good tones, literally a week later he was removed, because the americans harshly told everyone through the cia to check everyone to remove any ties that with the former warsaw there was nothing in the agreement with the soviet union. they quickly changed everyone in russian, they said something. yes, he spoke russian very well, of course, there was a stumbling block. this is, uh, yugoslavia, i am the number one participation here in these matters, and we really were here to pay tribute to sergei ivanovich . with alana the most severe negotiations. all the same. well, you are good. you know, the elite was different, no matter how they told me. here the elite was european

different. there can be there by professionals when i went to and throw gloves we gave ginger to me than i was called back. i called moscow saying before i go to moscow i want to throw a glove in his face. and he blushed when his literally, well, i'm not literally verbally lucky, of course. well, how are you an officer of officers general. well, in short, he became victor. he even there on crucian carp. i say, it means, well, i thrashed him for what, that they prepared an analysis of what could happen very poorly, sort of for the political leadership. only for this decision - it takes politics, that even for the elite to say what is necessary to pay tribute to sergei ivanovich, the salon called, i don’t remember what time it was at three or what hours in the morning and said, seryoga didn’t work out for long, they decided luxembourg somewhere against there, you know, it’s difficult, we will bomb. at least in this regard, do you understand that now is a different matter? i'm going

more. i'm on me if clarke knows, well, that's all there is. yes, and when i mean, i wrote some notes, i agree with the first point. victor agrees, and then writes the fourth paragraph. i agree, but i'm under victor's political line. i can't do it. the decision, then, is a chat of some kind of major general snotty. sorry, he says in mons or where you need to bomb russia, so the elite, you understand, everything brought down it was completely different from that. i obviously say there were other leaders. eh, powerful germany there, france, these are all this, all the same, the influence could be something, let's say modestly. it was possible to agree on something, all the same, it will come through serious ones. and now there is no yugoslavia, they started bombing. we flew to the negotiations, gave us a corridor. e meloshvich, i personally like this, as i saw you, i can't tell with my own eyes. and he is like that again, in my memory he remained a strong man, when the tsar gave him documents, he opened

his wine. so he reads, well, in english he reads, reads, reads everything, then he takes it, tears it up and throws it. it was something. this is already true. he says is this, is this all? we are witnesses, that's all. and so it went, then we are here is a very important point. of course, they started another break. all e scythe metochia straw, and all and clandestine negotiations were. we almost agreed that it would be separate, our russian we literally outstripped the peacekeeping sector separately. there, for 40 minutes, two battalions, having unloaded macedonia, two battalions marched. uh, british ships at the airfield. see, you mean this throw? well, of course, and we are already there, and when something was already chained. well, you know what? and here, as a participant eyewitness. many then i remember very well many people said so, that it is, of course, very famously very bravo but senselessly

strategic wrong. they spoke absolutely wrong. now i will explain why this is the first deployed, a chic hospital, the chicest treated . we all control. all situations the airfield was in our hands was different. i want to say this too . even today i say, i am in favor of leaving our group. there was our general head of the airport, our love plane somewhere, which landed when they were already accepting the paratroopers and placing them in these, like the sectors of our shpakovsky paratroopers. this is jackson who contacted me. he says, victor i, we ca n't settle. everywhere your plane lands with people. and our empty sits down. this is how they sat down. it's empty, it's empty, well, there was a report. and if there were intensified negotiations, of course, one could leave.

yes there were times the world changed beyond recognition. well, for example, 25 years ago, when the founding act was signed, russia nato did someone discuss in the nato context, china where is the euro-atlantic, and where is the prc. but in the new concept , china is called a source of systemic competition, undermining the order, based on the rules, almost an adversary. we asked our old friend jailbo retired military, and now a researcher at tsinghua university, how china perceived the nato summit by chance for china, the most remarkable is the presence of the prime minister himself. japan for the first time in history the question is what is the purpose of the us secretary of defense catches austin recently at the shangala conference said that there are no plans to create an asian one? nato yes, then what about the topic of ukraine, the russian threat to solidarity

is understandable, but we are most interested in. why did the heads of japan and south korea come there? china mentioned as a serious challenge means in your opinion that europe european countries will now extend their military activities to the pacific ocean. they can demonstrate some symbolic gestures to send a couple of ships a second time to remind them that they have legitimate interests there. one of the problems. distance, as some call the tyranny of nato's geography, is simply too far from china, the second obstacle nato as an alliance is one, but if you look at individual countries, they have different views on china, enough european states, who have friendly relations with china, especially the economic americans, have decided to consider china as a strategic competitor and want to adapt nato to this task, but discard their interests in favor of the us intention in the asia-pacific region. why is it in europe with the unification of the united states of great britain can be

formed as an anti-china alliance? yes, the aucus is a purely military organization. and the united states will do everything to strengthen it. will other countries want australia or say south korea to engage in specifically a military buildup? if i were them, i would think hard, south korea, for example, is very dependent on china in terms of peace and stability on the korean peninsula. so she can't ignore the chinese reaction when the south koreans hosted american anti-missile systems, they got a very powerful response from china that they did not count on, if they decide to join the auction, then let them use their imagination to present the chinese responses. another event of the last summit is the official invitation of finland and sweden to join the alliance, turkish president erdon masterfully paused and at the last moment

agreed not to block expansion in exchange for promises. helsinki stockholm to fight kurdish extremism. soon the number of nato countries will reach an impressive 32, but does the quantity always turn into quality? we asked vladimir printed how much the ussr at one time relied on the allies under the warsaw pact on paper. everything looked pretty good. so it changed in the case, yes. it was really an operation in response to an attack over the course, but offensive, therefore, it means that the czechs planned to invade the territory of the federal republic of germany, so the poles should have easily captured denmark there and so on. in the course of a week there, another has already come out of the rattler, that is, on paper. everything looked good and safe. yes, but reality in reality means, of course, there was no complete trust, and this was one of the vulnerable features, and i think the air traffic control structures compared to nato are still

real coordination and consultations, including on military plans for nuclear planning the vvd did not have a nuclear planning group, such as it is, as it is in inata, and those military plans that were in moscow, they, in general, were not brought to the attention of the allies. tactical plans were brought up as part of the military exercises of the command and staff military, which were carried out but he was big strategic plans, they remained secret for the allies for the allies, besides, they were very worried that most of these exercises proceeded from the fact that the main military operations will take place in the central western central and eastern europe without touching, especially the territory of the soviet union, that is, they were under attack. not being fully informed about how to behave. uh, the soviet union in this situation is interesting, while

being informed by the soviet leadership thanks to intelligence. what was being done in nato and nato's plans was, as is now becoming understandable , very high. here there were agents from among the gdrovites who worked in the very. uh, brussels itself is pretty close to making decisions. so what did moscow know about nato's plans, if not about everything, of course, then the main points of the epic. there were some nato members too. what are they informed about? especially. through poland, as we know, this leak took place through representatives of poland, uh, in command of the department of internal affairs, the famous ukrainian colonel was the source of important information. although it seems to me that we are still better informed about what is happening in nato than we need to speak about the ats? of course you have to. all support consistency end

no there mutual mutual trust. between the members of this organization in the police department were dominated by sati 's commanding style; the main decisions were all made without much effort. they were made in moscow; this, of course, made these relations less reliable, especially at a critical moment. i think there is complete confidence in moscow that in the event of a big war. the same poles, well, in relation to the germans. i think there were no particular doubts with their, so to speak, discipline, diligence, and so on. here the poles could behave differently. but viktor zavarzin was always sure that russia would definitely we need to strengthen our alliance. i then already raised the role of edb. that's when i speak frankly. now i'm standing under any camera, i want to say that the work that will last on the propaganda of road accidents is weak,

work and let's honestly admit that they are coming. guys, i'm not going to list them all as dkbeshnye and that's all they sit in the bushes or don't vote or even head against us. i was the minister of all the corridors, the birthday girl of all, because i already had experience there and talked to everyone with them. it won't work that way guys. and now if we go back to our time. we are these shos dkb. we must revive these organizations. you, as a political scientist , understand that this is very important, we understand precisely, therefore, while valmal and madrid were committed, the seven and nato of the russian leadership. intensively communicated with interlocutors from briks and the caspian five. maybe not all allies, but all very necessary partners are worth the time, spain by the way, where the summit was held, the fortieth anniversary of participation in nato is celebrated. how is the mood in

madrid ? nato summit, the choice is not accidental. this year marks 40 years since the country joined the organization. and it took time to join the alliance. leopold kalva was the initiator of joining the alliance. satello prime minister after forty years of dictatorship. franco, he was replaced by philip gonzalez , who, even during his election campaign , openly declared that he was an opponent of nato. however, at that moment, spain was in the process of modernization, so he was forced to ensure the country's security and solve internal problems such as the gibraltar issue on march 12, 1986. in spain, a historic referendum was held on the further stay of spain in nato, the country became the sixteenth member of the alliance back in 82, but abstained from participating in the military structure of the bloc, according to the results of the referendum, the majority of spaniards gave a positive answer, while 40% were against, which demonstrated deep division in society. therefore, the question of the definitive command

structure of the alliance madrid joined only in ninety-sixth year. after nato was headed, the former minister of foreign affairs of spain , by the way, was a former opponent of joining the union. javier salana ercedeushou americano our cooperation with the us has always been very close even during the war in iraq i think that in the current conflict, spain will stand up for ukraine, which it already does by accepting refugees and providing financial assistance in the country, and we should not forget that we have very important geographical position. we can actively help with the logistics for the summit in the capital, the ministry of foreign affairs took security measures and deployed more than 10,000 police firefighters and volunteers a few days before the start, the fourth level of anti-terrorist threat was introduced in the country , a special unit was involved in the fight against drones and the airspace over madrid was closed. central street was also blocked for the passage of delegations, which created a number of inconveniences for ordinary spaniards. the time of the summit blocked part of

the roads, both the capital itself and beyond the mayor of madrid has advised all residents to change to public transport. to avoid traffic jams and, if possible, work from the comfort of home many attractions. such as the prada museum and the royal palace were closed to ordinary citizens by tourists. this, of course, caused a lot of inconvenience in the days before thousands of people themselves took part in the demonstration. under the slogan. there is no nato, in particular representatives of the ultra-left party. destroyed, the incoming government coalition members opposed the increased spending of the kingdom, on the defense according to the spanish prime minister. petersons, spain wants to double its military spending in the next few years. it is not surprising that many spaniards doubt the necessity of the existence of this organization. i believe that this summit is held only to maintain the image of the organization. it's just marketing first russian-y. the conflict is everything that the newspapers

radio television reports, one continuous propaganda in many western countries, where there is censorship, but if there is still some kind of freedom in the press, then in spain 99% of the media provide the same information that the local population is led to, however, there are people here who read and have not forgotten what libya and other countries should have done in yugoslavia. they question the truth of the alliance's goals so far, spain has not lost the choice and could change the course of the country. however, the protracted political crisis and other pressing issues like rising electricity prices, gasoline and food products represent a difficult task, currently, the current spanish government has big plans for further cooperation with the alliance, however, the gradual decline in the prestige of the organization. leading her recent actions is the thought of many spaniards about the need for her existence, and a member from the outside and in nato continues to be the subject of fierce disputes and contradictions. among the population daria kustova miguel

gonzalez especially for international review madrid spain while joseph biden rides around europe, his house horror what's going on just the same litigation mayhem about it after advertising. switch science. the first month for only a ruble half price until the end of the year, rbt large stores and generous discounts benefit up to 50%, so an atlant refrigerator with autonomous cold storage until 17:00 for only 23.490 rubles. generous discounts at rbt.ru. let me pay. no, come on, i’m still, but let me

cry, we haven’t heard about the prank. pay through st. petersburg to win the main prize, in fact, a million rubles through the fast payment system of promotional partners and participate in the drawing of prize money every day about head is spinning on pep. to improve cerebral circulation of the brain, restore memory and reduce dizziness. now i won't forget. for sportmaster, the prices are divided in half in the mobile application on the website and in stores, it seems that in order to get a discount on the old group of one, we now do not have a single tariff package. tele2 has different rules, without changing the personal tariff, everyone receives a discount to the group, even if you are from different cities,

each of you will receive a discount and your connection will become even more profitable. join groups and get discounts from tele2 are you thinking about moving to a bigger apartment? find it on the site domclick domclick is the number one real estate service in russia in terms of the number of ads for the sale of apartments. and there is also a discount on a mortgage when buying an apartment or house, domclick is the number one real estate service, there are places that we know well. and where do we go for the very same taste of that very smile, the very same. mom , you can have potatoes goodbye, which was once and will be remembered forever for coffee, without which you can’t wake up and the very moment when you went for coffee, but stayed for an hour, after a random stop and a phrase, the route was rebuilt to the same table where couples were walking and quality, behind which dozens of suppliers stand and stand behind the wall, the name changes love remains the same 162,000 people

are already waiting for millions to say delicious again. the point works like a refrigerator or a freezer that makes comfort available, discomfort, and sickens, throws up and turns everything, boils and diarrhea. here you need a filter as soon as possible thanks to millions of micropores, filtrum like a sponge absorbs various bacteria toxins, helping to eliminate unpleasant symptoms filtrum style, to clean up the stomach for the whole family. now spending has grown, but salaries will not be cut anyway. okay? what is there to save now? open a free business account with alpha bank. connect advertising in yandex.bise, and we will transfer you 10,000 rubles. shopping for a summer residence in a savings banquet turns into a profit. pay for goods from your favorite stores with sberbank cards and get 10% bonuses. order. before me is a unique historical

document the standard of living of german citizens was continuously declining until 1918, in some regions people began to starve. i was glad that such a kind force was found that would somehow help disinterestedly. the whole experience of ukrainian statehood at the beginning of the 20th century, that the directory, that the gate fan of skoropadsky is one big continuous caricature, the misfortune of skoropadsky turned out to be that he tried to sit between different chairs, the result is understandable - this is a fall in the betrayal of fundamental interests people to please the german and austrian occupiers. the heroine of the most famous comedy of the ancient greek

playwright aristophanes organized athenian women to strike not to fulfill their marital duties until their husbands stop the endless wars the participants of mass protests in new york demand the same, but for a different reason, abstinence if the us supreme court does not return the right to abortion to americans the supreme court in america loves abbreviations and this body passes under the code abbreviation scotus ruled to reconsider the historic decision of seventy third year in roy v. wide, in doing so, the highest court overturned the universal right to terminate a pregnancy, which had previously been a federal prerogative returned to the state.

in 1969, norma mccorvey noticed that a woman had become pregnant and had problems with drugs, alcohol, and two children. whose upbringing. she hardly worked out. she decided to terminate the pregnancy and said that she was raped under the laws of the state of texas it was the only legal way to have an abortion prove rape. she failed and tried to have an illegal abortion, but the doctor was arrested by the police at this time, linda coffee's lawyers. and sarah wendington was looking for a plaintiff on behalf of whom they could sue the state of texas they did so in the seventieth year on behalf of jane roe this is, in fact, the female analogue of the designation of a party to a lawsuit, a proper name borrowed from roman law to designate unknown. let's say if you were talking about a place and not a person, then you would name the city of ann as the defendant. the district attorney spoke. and oh, the court ruled

in favor of the woman, but did not cancel the existing laws, the case came to the supreme court, the validity of the consideration was not obvious. after all , the supreme court decides only real disputes . by this time, the woman managed to give birth to a girl. they gave it up for adoption. this means that the conflict was settled to speak on behalf of all women, the norm could not, but based on the social importance of the matter. this is not the first time the court has made an exception. in history. after all, the situation could repeat itself, the result of a lawsuit the proceeding was the decision that a woman's right to terminate a pregnancy is guaranteed by the us constitution she can have an abortion as long as the fetus is not viable, that is, the gestation period does not exceed 28 weeks before this decision of the supreme court questioned the legality of abortion. decided at the state level. thirty states banned abortion entirely, and 16 were severely restricted. and only

four are freely allowed. the resonance is gigantic in the usa throughout the western world, why we will talk about this to the wonderful specialists victoria zhuravleva head of the center for north american studies and momo victoria hello, tell me why? actually, the topic of abortion is clear that it is important for society, but it literally blew everything up and the main thing became. here is such a watershed into two, as it were, groups of people. in general, this topic has been difficult for american society for many long decades and the decision of the supreme court. as if periodically expected, that is, with every change, the increase in the conservatism of the supreme court in society all the time surfaced. here is the expectation. now it will be canceled now it will be canceled and it seems to me that this is a decision, but as

a mirror. here it reflects all the specifics of the american state and american society, it also reflects how they are accepted. political decisions in the usa, that is, how high the role of the judicial system is in them, then ah, how divorced the state is from society, because if we look at social polls, then 74% of society does not support the decisions of the supreme court 74%, and 61% americans believe that a-a abortion should be legalized. there are all sorts of nuances. yes? from what month and so on, but in principle 61% of american society believes that women should have the right to have an abortion, including republicans, and accordingly the question arises. and why? for whom this decision was made, and here

is another point that this decision reflects is the huge politicization of the entire social agenda in american society in the seventy-third year, when the decision to legalize abortion was made, it was made in response. social request, but it was largely promoted by the medical community, because there was a very high percentage of female deaths in the century of criminalization of abortion, it really was just a monstrous situation and the supreme court made the decision that society needed. and now the supreme court has made a decision that the political elite of the conservative wing of the republican party needs. this is what revolts society. why such and such a resonance and what generally reflects the essence of what is happening today in the united states that, with this decision, they not only begin, but then, so to speak, cancel everything that the

progressives considered the achievement of the last few decades there, well, up to, well, the legalization of same-sex marriages. well, i think that the legalization of same-sex marriage is next in line, this is the very first thing, because it was generally hardly accepted. and if you look, in principle, society has an ambiguous attitude to this far, not in all states this is accepted. that is, this is just such a brand new new change. and in the agenda, which can be touched upon, but hmm it seems to me that they started from the very loudest and the most destructive there are two points of view. i got one, what is it? well, in general, such a collapse of a model or a model is moving these checks and balances is moving towards rahu, and the other is vice versa, which is just very, uh, painful, but necessary. here is the reorganization

that the new will bring forth. uh, a new healthier society. who do you think is more right polarization? paradoxically, but it's something that uh keeps the political system from too drastic changes, that is, we say, well, they often criticize yes, for today's pro-situation, for radicalization, but in reality. uh, look. here's an example of a trump who came up with the decision to break everything and change everything. he cannot do this, but in conditions of tough opposition from another part of society. same comes biden with a huge social agenda, which for the liberal side of society is exactly what they want, but 48% of american society doesn't think they're ready. to such significant changes. and here it is. ah, the polarity of opinions and, accordingly, the polarity of e political parties. it seems to be blocking, here, and

the drastic changes that it can bring to the president. now power is much more polarized and radicalized. than society. this is the liberal-conservative dichotomy, it is obvious in the parties, but it is more imposed on society than it is in society in society. in fact, there is a very large variety between the extreme rules and the extreme left and the middle. there the more they are more ready to agree and understand each other. although, indeed, the extreme poles speak different languages. and in general they are on different planets in different countries, if you look at the congress, then the largest faction is the legal republicans, the next after it are the left-wing democrats. they speak in different languages. they do not allow to carry out what one side does not allow the other to carry out its agenda, and in society there is a middle ground. and in general, society is set up for a dialogue, we live with it in a different legal culture we don’t really understand sometimes that america well, they say

that america is a country with weights. and that, in general, the judiciary is the main one there. what does this mean for the political system? this is a plus or minus in terms of this stability. it means that the separation of powers, which we often know about as america, is a symbol of the separation of powers , which implies not only a division into the executive legislative, but also an extremely large role for the judiciary. the supreme court of the united states is above the appellate instance, it can accept any case of a lower court. at in this case, the supreme court has the right to make not only legal, but also political decisions, for example, to decide whether the normative and legal acts of the us congress or the federal government comply with the us constitution, the court itself selects issues that will often be considered related to the most pressing social topics. usually, about 100 cases a year go through a hearing

out of eighty thousand requests, the decision is binding, they cannot be argued and they can greatly change the lives of americans, for example, racial segregation in schools was abolished precisely supreme court in 1954. each of the nine judges is appointed by the president of the united states for life after approval by the senate. a vacancy appears only when the judge dies or serves himself. the stand of a judge is conditionally divided into conservatives and liberals, that is, nominees from republican or democratic presidents under trump. judging by the republicans, there are more than democrats. six to three before the ratio was five to four, but sometimes republican chief justice john roberts voted with the liberals and the case was decided not in favor of conditional conservatives, for example, this is how

a decision was made to ban dismissal from work for non-traditional sexual orientation. very often, the vector of social development of society is changed by decisions of the supreme court. and this, of course, is a moment that the executive legislature is also forced to take into account. it is paradoxical that at the time of the president and congress the supreme court never intervenes, but these are such indirect decisions. eh, like, for example, the abolition of the legalization of abortion is, in fact, interference in the agenda of a democratic president. that is, it turns out to intervene and very very actively, and here again we recall that the political process in the united states is organized through parties and in conditions where the parties are radicalized. it turns out that the president and? it is not always possible to be

sure that he can carry out his social agenda, because the supreme court was formed before him. and if here he is, as he is already conservative, then the supreme court will have its own agenda. and it turns out that in the state there are at least three agendas - the agenda of the president, the agenda of the congress and the agenda of the supreme court, everything becomes very complicated, as if the ideal idea that the court in its politics is absolutely not relevant for america. no, he is not out of politics. thank you very much victoria zhuravleva from immor was with you. the revision of the decision on abortion in the united states caused a controversial reaction from the supreme court - it is written on the starting pistol that opened a new civil confrontation. drawing by steve brin bill branki from the liberal camp there is unhappy not only abortions, but also permission to carry weapons in new york quietly, the lady says to her husband i put contraceptives in the gun, apparently

a hint that gun conservatives do not check michael ramirez and the traditional donkey as a symbol of the democrats on the poster says death to the supreme court and on the belly is the inscription humanity. and then donkey says i need an abortion harry warvel over the historic court decision death mourns the revision did roll against wade, a deeply conservative image and f-branca hints at the return of trump to the big politics. he uses the famous biden meme. i did it, and raising the price of gasoline. it's right there on the poster. case review.ru vs. wade, gun permit in new york trump lookalike says i did it. something else remarkable happened this week russia did not make payments to service its

bonds, as the western media happily wrote the first russian default on foreign obligations since 1918, the analogy is beautiful, but wrong 104 years ago, the bolsheviks refused to pay, declaring borrowing of the tsarist and provisional governments illegal. and now the russian federation wants to pay and is ready, but it is not allowed. actually lenders. having blocked all the ways of passing money, it is possible to imagine that creditors were imbued with the spirit of not acquisitiveness, but it is difficult, which means that a landmark policy has finally won the economy. and if we add here the discussion at the big seven, the introduction of an administrative ceiling on oil and gas prices begins to smell of infusion. and the current we sent to the will of the global gas plan. here's a share aforementioned bolsheviks never dreamed of. it was

an international review. see you. it went on for years. at first there were few of them, and then there was more indoctrination of the population. this is a necessary condition before any military operation through the media. and they, in principle, came to the process, monstrous crimes against people trained by western instructors. donbass russophobia turned out to be a profitable business of this phenomenon. never would have reached such proportions. if the americans had not invested hundreds of millions of dollars in this, there would already be nazism. he is not

born, he is.

during the war, the mountains from dump mine rocks became important strategic objects. he does not understand what the interests of the west are. every day, 10-15 people receive medical assistance for russian paratroopers in the donbass . first of all, fire damage is inflicted on them. bring to your brothers. yeah hold on hold on homie i've been in occupation for 8 years from the fourteenth year, if the donbass loses the

west will not stop, it will continue to tear russia it will be interesting you ask, you ask in the summer it will be exciting in summer it will be exciting in prayer. you know? come back. summer will not be boring movies series documentaries cartoons

the russian army forces of the luhansk people's republic have taken control yet.