groups of russian troops involved in the special operation in ukraine were checked by the chief of the general staff of the first deputy minister of defense valery gerasimov, he heard reports from commanders and other military specialists on the use of troops in their

combat support in various directions combat control system kiev blocks the exit from the sport in 70 foreign courts, this was reported in the ministry of defense is here, for a long time they have been idle in kherson nikolaev chernomorsky ochakov odessa yuzhny, they cannot go to sea because of the constant threat of shelling from ukraine, there is also a high risk of being blown up by mines. at the same time, russia created the necessary conditions for movement along two humanitarian corridors to the black seas of azov, also with the statement of the ministry of defense in kramatorsk and bakhmuti, which, while still under the control of kiev, the militants equipped barracks in dormitories and educational institutions in the adjacent territory placed armored vehicles mortar positions heavy artillery. four settlements of the dpr survived the attacks of ukrainian

hailstones from multiple launch rocket systems . now the russian army is developing an offensive in all directions of the donbass front, including in the lpr. the northern outskirts, lisichansk, is already under the control of the allied forces. cleanups are going on in the city this was announced by the ambassador of the people's republic in russia, rodion miroshnik, according to information. the ministry of defense's failure of the ukrainian military provokes an increase in the number of deserters fleeing an entire unit. the footage of the combat work of the crews of tanks and armored personnel carriers of the marines was shown by the ministry of defense during a special operation, military personnel confidently operate on the battlefield, suppressing firing points and fortified positions of the armed forces and us battalions. tankers and crews of armored transporters are moving forward to the line. opening fire destroying targets, after which it changes

position, taking into account the religion of the area and natural shelter, while using complex tactical elements, flank shooting, the destruction of the enemy is carried out when the vehicle is in motion. this increases the survivability of vehicles on the battlefield. now about the russian fighters who showed bravery courage and heroism on the battlefield, the ministry of defense published the names of the russian military, thanks to whom they managed to free the settlements to develop an offensive over strategically important areas. and most importantly, keep life of comrades. a group of senior sergeant alexander tkachenko discovered in the forest a detachment of tkachenko's opponent and his comrades were imposed on the enemies. the battle was eliminated by the commander and nine militants. remaining nationalists. they tried to escape leaving their wounded, but in the end everyone was destroyed. the senior sergeant's group left the battle without loss. corporal bogdan sharovaren, acting as part of a tank platoon, bypassed the fortified positions of the enemy from the flank, found a convoy behind which the

leading fire, militants were hiding. our tankers destroyed two infantry fighting vehicles and 20 nationalists. through action. sharovarin, managed to take control of the settlement, sergeant, jonai, dulo safarov commander, squads of the platoon of anti-tank guns performed the task of destroying enemy positions and armored vehicles during the battle. he hit two car armor, a firing point and a machine-gun crew , the action of a sergeant allowed our troops to develop an offensive in a given direction and not allow any losses. the nato summit in brussels has never been like this. and here again russia is the main enemy western leaders have decided on the idea around which idea we all need to rally. and how to proceed further , at least until a peace agreement on the ukrainian conflict is in sight. more about this and not only in the international review. hello on air international review in the studio of fyodor lukyanov today in the program international review events of the week

of chronicles facts comments russia the main enemy report from the scene the story of a noisy divorce how relations with nato developed our materials the programs were allowed to ban the new tempest in american gun politics prior to the right to abortion. fly fly petal through the west to the east through the north through the south return made in a circle, a magic spell from a fairy tale by valentin kataev , a flower-seven-color, is the best illustration of the way the north atlantic treaty was organized after the cold war at the summit in madrid, a new strategic concept was adopted, which calls russia

is the direct and most important threat of painful wandering around the countries of the world, in search of a mission completed returned making the circle during the existence of the north atlantic alliance, its ideologists identify three main stages; the first lasted from the formation of the bloc until the collapse of the soviet union during this time, four strategic concepts were adopted ; will be attacked after the outbreak of the war in korea , the strategic concept focused on ensuring the defense of the territory of the member states of the alliance in the event of an attack, nato was to begin from air strikes, and then move on to land and sea operations as needed, it was emphasized that all types of weapons, including nuclear weapons, would be used in air strikes, even then the united states sought to push back the line of defense.

as far east as possible, closer to the iron curtain. this task was completed in may 1955 when fe became a member of nato. so the collapse of the ussr was defined by nato ideologists as the beginning of a new stage, it lasted 10 years until the september 11 attacks , during this period two more containment concept. the concept of cooperation and security was added to the defense, the russia nato council was created at the same time the expansion of the alliance to the east began, the third stage came after the september 11 attacks. nato announced that the main resources of the organization will be directed to the fight against terrorism and for the first time the forces of the alliance acted outside the euro-atlantic region. the events of this year brought out the accumulated mutual hostility and finally allowed nato to consolidate the confrontation with russia on

doctrinal level, yes, and among us who believed in sincere partnership with the north atlantic alliance, even in dietary times, the hammered wording of the aggressive nato bloc still rebounds from the teeth of most fellow citizens. why be surprised the alliance was created to oppose the ussr and played a pivotal role throughout the cold war to the origins by the end of the forties clung at our request the brilliant historian vladimir olegovich of the printed strategy of the west in this cold war was precisely the displacement of the soviet union from this sphere of influence not return to its borders. uh, 41 is better than 39. but this was supposed to be done without a big war by the soviet union by all means except war. in this sense, how to deprive the ussr of the fruits of the victory and in the second world the balance of power, the intentions of both sides were, in my opinion, as follows,

but in the west, both stalin and in the west, intelligence diplomacy came from the fact that the soviet union would not be able to. even if he wants to cut a big war in europe over the next 10-15 years, he has neither the resources nor the will to do so, readiness to fight on their part, too, was not considered that the country was threatened with an immediate military attack. from the west, from the side of the newly created over the very reaction to the creation of nato was quite calm. i would say it was a statement. mida made a statement by the soviet government, in which he said that this was an aggressive bloc, that all this was somewhere a violation of the un charter, and so on, but the soviet leadership did not take any retaliatory measures, especially of a military nature. although in general the balance of power, if we take its military the measurement was not in favor of the soviet union,

therefore, the threat, in general, of such an attack, it could not be written off from the shields. moreover, the united states itself was brought into debate and even open, and the need for a preventive atomic strike on the soviet union, especially after testing of the first soviet atomic device in august 1949, when the united states had a kind of small window of opportunity before the soviet union acquired delivery vehicles and received a sufficient number of nuclear warheads there was a temptation to launch this pre-emptive strike against the soviet union, which, of course, aggravated the situation and created such a situation of military military danger in this light. that's all soviet. post-war foreign policy was aimed, as it were, at solving this main problem. how to weaken this threat from its

creation, of course, the military in the form of nato, and there are two main directions here. e soviet foreign policy. the first is naturally creating a counterweight. its military-political bloc, which would be at least comparable better to surpass nato in terms of its resources, and in this respect, work begins immediately after the creation of nato at the end of 49, the cmea is created, as we know, economic integration begins, already in the fifty-first year, the already well-known meeting of ustalin with representatives of the socialist countries on which he sets the task, strengthened by the forced militarization of these countries, increased combat readiness, the next 2 years, hoping that by that time the united states will be bogged down by the war in korea and europe new opportunities are created, in the presence of such a military military superiority, however, in addition to

building up our own capabilities. the soviet union did not stop diplomatic efforts. the second direction was naturally, the weakening of the enemy, that is, the weakening of nato, when soviet documents and internal benefits were expressed. it was necessary to loosen, loosen or decompose this bloc, attempts were made not unsuccessfully to limit the military presence of nato in some countries close to the soviet borders, such as norway, denmark, which were offended not to host nuclear weapons and american military bases, the second task was to prevent the remilitarization of germany by west germany and its entry into nato, because in moscow, as well as in washington, london was well aware that without the german military machine without the german military economic power. it will be ineffective there. well, here are the known things. this is the fifty-second year

when they began the famous proposal to create the withdrawal of germany on a neutral basis. here's how the way repeats prevent integration of west germany into nato this plan did not pass, but there were interesting proposals. in the same, perhaps in the same spirit, more ambitious fifty- fourth year, already after stalin, in connection with the council of ministers of foreign affairs, a regular meeting and in connection with the summit meeting in geneva, soviet diplomacy prepared a whole package of then agreement proposals that would, as in some kind of degree weakened this threat from nato well, firstly, it was proposed to essentially create a system of collective security from europe this times with the participation of the united states in addition, it was proposed to conclude an attack between the warsaw pact and nato

, there were proposals for the withdrawal of foreign troops of foreign bases from the territory of european states to the disengagement of forces in the center of europe . soviet diplomacy supported the rapatsky plan, not unknown of that time , little of these proposals worked out, but the idea itself the creation of a collection of a collective security system in europe, if not in exchange for nato, then at least as such a shock absorber for this bloc confrontation. this idea has been preserved and will be restored in the sixties and will bring. in general, to create. e of this security system based on the osce. do you know, when ukraine first applied for nato membership in 1954, being the ukrainian ussr, then the soviet leadership came up with a move sent a note to the usa great britain france the ussr is ready to join the bloc and

create a joint security system of the ukrainian and belarusian ussr in the fifth year accepted won as sovereign states instructed to also request membership win-win settlement will be accepted. we will separate from the inside will not be accepted. ah, here. you didn’t accept what we created then and created the warsaw pact, then a lot more happened nikita sergeevich khrushchev was all bar-keeper at the famous plenum of the central committee who dismissed khrushchev from the post of first secretary. companions, among other sins, accused him that under him the country three times, without serious reasons, found itself on the brink of war. the united states and nato meant the suez berlin and caribbean crisis, but more on that another time. now let's remember the history of less remote amazing times when nato and i were considered strategic partners. the fact that

nato broke the promise not to expand after the cold war is constantly remembered. but the disputes of the mid-nineties. diplomats forgot how to respond to expansion, they believed that it was necessary to at least reduce the effect by agreeing on restrictions hence the idea of ​​​​a founding act, russia nato, but there was an opposite point of view, any joint document legitimizes expansion, then it cannot be stopped, the council on foreign affairs spoke with it defense policy under the leadership of sergei karaganov. as a result, the act was signed. since then, the number of members of the alliance has grown by 2.5 times. the founding act of russia nato was signed in may 1997 in paris, then the side announced that they did not consider each other as adversaries, a joint russia nato council was established whose task was to form a higher level of

trust in order to increase the security of each other and all countries in the euro-atlantic region . the act stated that nuclear weapons would not be be located on the territory of potential new members. alliance, the military potentials of the parties must be at a level that is necessary for security, taking into account international obligations, including the treaty on conventional armed forces. in europe in the document. it was also stipulated that additional combat forces would not be permanently stationed on the territory of the new members. the alliance was confirmed by both sides. that it is the un security council that has the primary responsibility for maintaining the international community? peace and security, which means nato can only act under a security council mandate, where russia has the right to vetom the first crisis occurred in 1999, due to the bombing of yugoslavia, and in 2003, without the sanction of the un security council, the invasion of the united states and its allies

into iraq began; nevertheless, russian nato consultations continued, but relations sharply worsened in august 2008 after the shelling of tskhinvali and the subsequent forcing of georgia to peace in 2014 after the coup d'état in ukraine and the annexation of crimea to russia, the nato russia council ceased its work. about the atmosphere of that time we talked with the direct participant viktor mikhailovich zavarzin. the brave military leader became in 1997 russia's first chief military representative to nato, now he is a member of the state duma. you stood at the origins, one might say, of our relations with nato, when we ceased to be adversaries, now we somehow already remember this. even as a mirage, some as it was then. well, it was like this, firstly, our country was weak, so to speak, soft and militarily

in economic terms. and of course. nato understood all this. of course, they may not be complete. i’m already saying this from experience, then my analysis was not carried out to the end, as in that film, they said they were pissing, but they understood that let’s go for rapprochement. we are in prm, then we were in the ninety- fourth year. this is prm. partner. yes, the partnership of the world, there are many states, including russia , often here a big lecture by yevgeny maksimovich primakov is very big. by the way, i was present. yes, he was brothers and worked. here on the last lines of this founding act, when she kind of half-hugs her and says, well guys, i'm leaving for the night with her last to fence these questions. if we live a conclusion, then we will drink. here is an amazing person. he is an idol for me. i'll tell you the truth, the diplomacy of all of you will remain so. and so we signed the way it was, that means it was signed in paris, that means i was summoned

in me, says they survived for a conversation here the day before this case, they offered this position as chief representative. i didn't really understand what it was. it's really all new new. it certainly is. to be honest, it was such a small confusion, but then it was all there. and uh, so in the month of may was signed on the boots of harversalan. uh, this yeltsin came to paris and all the states of 16 states signed this act, what to provide for about the act. now says the act has come. these are my personal impressions of remembering, of course. this positive document came to a positive and again the role of yevgeny maksimovich. it's obvious here, just uh, the positive thing is that we stop becoming enemies to each other. leaving for some kind of partnership goes into a discussion really into a

colloquial discussion. uh, we take into account all positions, the role of the osce is given, and definitely in peacekeeping, the settlement of conflicts, and so on and so forth, the main role of both is emphasized in this fundamental act of the security council, it is all with its permission, and so on and so on and uh clearly spelled out in the act on the non-deployment of nuclear weapons of states that enter into an asset, it is not written in the act itself that they give the taboo on entry. well we're in agreements agreed that maksimych. so he agreed that, uh, hmm, they would not place significant forces in those states that should be entered. and so we leveled it all, leveled it equally, and then we realized that this was an empty conversation. but at what point did you understand, we understood, uh, that means almost 2 years later, when

three states entered the last ninety- ninth year. this is hungary czechoslovakia and poland czech republic uh, so czech republic right? they entered, they were going, it was immediately obvious, firstly, they were there representatives of some kind they first sent, especially the pole had such an amazing wonderful nature. i was even surprised by the general. well, we talked with him in good tones literally a week later he was removed, because the americans harshly told everyone through the cia to check everyone to remove any ties that were with the former warsaw pact, the soviet union. there is nothing fast everyone who does not understand russian spoke something. yes, he spoke russian very well, of course, there was a stumbling block. it's uh, yugoslavia i'm part of the number. one here in these matters, and we really here to pay tribute to sergei ivanovich washed. with alana the most severe negotiations. all the

same. well, you are good. you know, the elite was different, no matter how they told me. here the elite was european different. there can be professionals there when you went to and throw gloves we gave ginger. i was called in czech. i called moscow, i say before i go to moscow i want to throw a glove in his face, and he blushed when he was literally, well, i'm not literally verbally lucky, verbally, well, somehow an officer of officers is a general. well, and, in short, he became victor. he even there on crucian carp. i say, it means, well, i thrashed him for what, that they prepared an analysis very poorly of what could happen, sort of before the political leadership. only for this decision - this is to water the leadership accepts that even to the elite to say that it is necessary to pay tribute to sergey ivanovich sala, she called, i don’t remember what time it was at three or what time in the morning and said, seryoga didn’t work out. they took a long time to decide luxembourg somewhere against there

, you know, it's difficult, we will bomb. at least in this do you understand that things are different now? i'm going more. i'm on me if clarke knows, well, that's all there is. and when i mean, i wrote some notes, victor agrees with me the first point, and then writes the fourth point. i agree, but i'm under the political line victor i can't make this decision. so, now some major general is snotty. sorry, he says in mons or where you need to bomb russia, you see, the elite, everything collapsed here. it wasn't the same at all. i obviously say there were other leaders. uh powerful germany there france, these are all this, all the same, the influence could be something, let's say modestly. it was possible to agree on something, all the same through serious ones. and now there is no yugoslavia, they started bombing. we flew to negotiations and gave us a corridor. eh, petty. i personally like this, as i saw you, with my own eyes, and i can’t help but

say e such for five such in my memory remained a strong man, when sarah gave him a document, he opened his wine. so he reads, well, in english. reads, reads, reads everything. there he takes it, tears it up and throws it. it's really something it was here. come on, tell the truth, he says, that's all or that's all we are witnesses, that's all. and so it went, then we led. here is a very important point. of course, they started another break. all e scythe metochia straw, and all and clandestine negotiations were. we almost agreed that it would be separate, we literally outstripped our russian peacekeeping sector. there, for 40 minutes, two battalions, having unloaded macedonia, two battalions marched. uh, british courts. to the airfield , you understand, you mean this throw. write of course, and we are already there, and when everything was chained, everything was already. well, you know what? and here, as

an eyewitness participant, many then, in my opinion, i remember very well many people said so, that this, of course, is very famously very bravo but senseless strategic. cooked completely wrong. i will now explain why the first one was deployed, the chic hospital was treated with the most chic. we all control . all situations the airfield was in our hands were different. i want to say this too. i still speak today. i am for leaving our grouping. there was our general head of the airport, our hero, any plane that landed when they were already accepting the paratroopers and placing them in these, like the sectors of our shpakovsky paratroopers. this is jackson who contacted me. he says, victor i, we can't settle. everywhere your plane lands with people. and our empty sits down. this is how they sat down. it's empty, it's empty, well, there was a report. and if there were intensified

negotiations, of course, one could leave. yes there were times the world changed beyond recognition. well , for example, 25 years ago, when they signed founding act, russia nato has anyone discussed in the nato context, china where is the euro-atlantic, and where is the prc. but in the new concept , china is called a source of systemic competition that undermines the order based on the rules of almost adversaries. we asked our longtime friend jolbo, a retired military man and now a researcher at tsinghua university, how china perceived the nato summit. for china, the most remarkable thing is the presence of the prime minister at the summit. japan for the first time in history the question is for what purpose the us secretary of defense catches austin recently at the shangala conference said

that there are no plans to create an asian? nato yes, then what about the topic of ukraine, the russian threat to solidarity is understandable, but we are most interested. why did the heads of japan and south korea come there? the fact that china is mentioned as a serious challenge means, in your opinion, that europe, the european countries, will now extend their military activity to the pacific ocean. they can demonstrate some symbolic gestures to send a couple of ships once another. remind them that they have a legitimate interests. one of the problems. the distance, as some call the tyranny of nato's geography, is simply too far from china, the second obstacle to nato as an alliance is one, but if you look at individual countries, they have different views on china, there are enough european states that have friendly relations with china, especially economic americans have decided to consider china as a strategic competitor and want to adapt nato to this task, but discard their

interests to please the us intention in the asia-pacific region. why is this and europe and what about a bite? unification of the united states united kingdom trailer could form as an anti-china alliance? yes, and a bite - this is a purely military organization and the united states will do everything to strengthen it. will other countries want australia or, say, south korea to engage in a military buildup? if i were them, i would think hard, south korea, for example, is very dependent on china in terms of peace and stability on the korean peninsula. so she cannot ignore the chinese reaction when the south koreans hosted american anti-missile systems, then received a very powerful response from china that they did not count on, if they decide to join the auction, then let them use their imagination to present chinese responses. in another highlight of the last

summit, the official invitation to finland and sweden to join the alliance, turkish president erdogan skillfully paused and agreed at the last moment not to block expansion in exchange for promises. helsinki stockholm to fight kurdish extremism. soon the number of nato countries will reach an impressive 32, but does quantity always turn into quality? we asked vladimir printed how much the ussr at one time relied on the allies under the warsaw pact on paper. everything looked good. chekhov means changed in the case. yes, it was an offensive operation in response to the attack, of course, but offensive, which means that the czech planned to invade the territory of the frg, so the poles should have easily captured denmark there and so on . . everything looked like good and reliable. but reality in reality

means, of course, there was no complete trust, and this was one of the vulnerable features, and i think the atc command structure compared to nato is still real coordination and consultations, including on military plans and nuclear planning in the atc there was no such nuclear planning group. what is it like in nato and those military plans that were in moscow, they, in general, were not brought to the attention of the allies. tactical plans were presented within the framework of military exercises of the command and staff military, which were carried out here, but he had big strategic plans, they remained secret for the allies for the allies, besides, they were very worried that most of these exercises proceeded from the fact that the main military operations would take place on the territory of the central, i.e. western central and east. without touching, especially the territory of the soviet union, that is, they

were under attack. not being fully informed about how to behave. uh, the soviet union is interested in this situation, while being informed by the soviet leadership thanks to intelligence. what was being done in nato and nato's plans was, as is now becoming understandable, very high. there were agents from among the gdrovites who worked. in brussels itself, it is quite close to making decisions. so, in moscow, they knew about nato's plans, if not about everything, of course, then the main points of the epic. there were some nato members too. what are they informed about? especially. through poland, as we know, this leak took place through the representatives of poland, uh, in the command of the department of internal affairs, the famous ukrainian colonel was a source of important information. though it seems to me that we are better informed about

what is happening in nato than we should speak, of course. nato is later on the degree of support consistency there is no mutual mutual trust. between the members of this organization in the police department, the sati command style prevailed; the main decisions were all made without much effort. they were made in moscow, which, of course, made these relations less reliable, especially at a critical moment. i think there is complete confidence in moscow that in the event of a big war. the same poles, well, in relation to the germans. i think there were no particular doubts about their discipline, diligence, so to speak, and so on. here the poles could behave differently. but viktor zavarzin was always sure that russia definitely needed to strengthen its alliance. i then already raised the role of edb. that's when i speak frankly. now

i'm standing under any camera, i want to say that the work that will last on the propaganda of road accidents is weak, work and let's honestly admit that they are coming. guys, i will not list them all in an accident and everything is sitting in the bushes or not voting or even heads against us. it didn’t matter that i didn’t have a minister from everyone on the sidelines, because i already had experience there and talked to everyone with them. it won't work that way guys. and now if we return to our time. we are these shos dkb. we must revive these organizations. you, as a political scientist, understand that this is very important, we understand precisely, therefore, while valmal and madrid were committed, the seven and nato of the russian leadership. intensively communicated with interlocutors from briks and the caspian five. maybe not all allies, but all very necessary partners worth the time, spain by the way, where the summit was held celebrates the fortieth anniversary of participation in nato how the mood in madrid is reported by daria

kustovoy after 25 years, madrid reopened its doors for donations, the choice is not accidental. this year marks the 40th anniversary of the country's accession to the organization. and it took time for the eltologist was leopold kalva, satello prime minister after 40 years of dictatorship. franco was replaced by philippa gonzalez, who, even during his election campaign, openly declared that he was an opponent of nato. however, at that moment, spain was in the process of modernization, so he was forced to ensure the security of the country and solve internal problems such as the gibraltar issue on march 12, 1986. in spain, a historic referendum was held on the further stay of spain in nato, the country became the sixteenth member of the alliance back in 82, but abstained from participating in the military structure of the bloc, according to the results of the referendum, the majority of spaniards gave a

positive answer, but 40% spoke against, which demonstrated a deep split in society. therefore, the question of the final command structure of the alliance madrid joined only in the ninety-sixth year. after nato was headed, the former minister of foreign affairs of spain , by the way, was a former opponent of joining the union. javier with alana rsfgu. show americano our cooperation with the usa has always been very close even during the war in iraq i think that in the current conflict, spain will stand up for ukraine, which it already does by accepting refugees and providing financial assistance in country and do not forget that we have a very important geographical position. we can actively help with logistics for the summit in the capital the ministry of foreign affairs took security measures and deployed more than 10,000 police fire doctors volunteers a few days before the start, the fourth level of anti-terrorist threat was introduced in the country , a special unit was activated to combat drones and the airspace

over madrid was closed the main street was also blocked for the passage of delegations, which created a number of inconveniences with a simple spaniard. the time of the summit blocked part of the roads. both the capital itself and outside it, the mayor of madrid advised all residents to transfer to public transport. to avoid traffic jams and, if possible, work many sights without leaving home. such as the prada museum and the royal palace were closed to ordinary citizens by tourists. this, of course, caused a lot of inconvenience in the days before thousands of people themselves took part in demonstrations. under the slogan. there is no nato, in particular representatives of the ultra-left party. destroyed, the incoming government coalition participants opposed the increase in the kingdom's spending on defense, according to the spanish prime minister. pedera sanchez, spain wants to double its military spending in the next few years. it is not surprising that many spaniards doubt the necessity of the existence of this organization. i believe that this

male is held only to maintain the image of the organization. it's just marketing first russian-u. conflict is everything that newspapers report, radio television, one continuous propaganda in many western countries censorship has been introduced, but if in france and germany there is still some kind of freedom in the press, then in spain 99% of the media submit the same information, which is the local population, however, and here there are people who read and have not forgotten what should have been done in yugoslavia, libya and other countries. they question the true goals of the alliance until spain has lost its choice and could change course of the country, however, the protracted political crisis and other pressing problems, such as rising electricity prices, gasoline and food products, are a difficult task, at present, the current spanish government has big plans for further cooperation with the alliance, however, the gradual decline in the prestige of the organization leading its recent actions is many spaniards think about the

need for its existence, and the country's membership in nato continues to be the subject of fierce disputes and contradictions. among the population daria kustova miguel gonzalez especially for international review madrid spain while joseph biden rides around europe, his house is horror what's going on just the same judicial lawlessness about this after advertising. this is an advertisement for vtb, there are things that will not disappear anywhere, our experience accumulated over decades, which helped us become stronger and survive all crises. that is why everything will be in order with your money, as from the fulfillment of the dream of your home and the opportunity to support loved ones at the most necessary moment. switch to vtb and everything will work out i book accommodation in russia on the site daily.ru apartments hotels guest houses at affordable prices 150,000

options for every taste. and also super. cashback 30%. the apartment works like a refrigerator or like a freezer. let me pay. no, let's still me, but let me cry, pay through sbp, and win the main prize, actually a million rubles. pay for purchases through the system of fast payments from partners of promotions and participate in the drawing of cash prizes every day. the most famous comedies of the ancient greek playwright aristophanes organized athenian women to go on strike not to perform marital duties until husbands stop endless wars mass

protesters in new york demand the same, but for a different reason, abstinence if the us supreme court does not return the right to abortion to americans the supreme court in america loves acronyms and this body is code-abbreviated scotus decided to review the landmark decision of the seventy- third year in the case of roy v. waida, thereby the highest court canceled the universal the right to terminate a pregnancy, which was previously a federal prerogative , returned to the state. in 1969, norma mccorvey noticed that a woman had become pregnant and had problems with drugs, alcohol, and two children. whose upbringing. she hardly worked out. she decided to terminate the pregnancy and claimed she was raped under texas law. it was the only legal way to have an abortion

to prove the rape. she could not and tried to have an illegal abortion, but the doctor arrested by the police at the time, lawyers linda coffee and sarah wington were looking for a plaintiff on behalf of whom they could file a lawsuit against the state of texas they did it in the seventieth year on behalf of jane roe this is, in fact, the female equivalent of the designation of a party to a lawsuit, borrowed from roman law proper name to designate unknown , say, if you were talking about a place, and not about a person, then you would call it a city. the defendant was the district attorney. oh, the court ruled in favor of the woman, but did not cancel the existing laws the case reached the supreme court, the legitimacy of the consideration was not obvious. after all, the supreme court decides only real disputes. by this time, the woman managed to give birth to a girl. they gave it up for

adoption. this means that the conflict was settled to speak on behalf of all women, the norm could not, but based on the social importance of the matter. this is not the first time the court has made an exception. in history. after all, the situation could repeat itself, the result of the trial was the decision that the right of a woman to terminate a pregnancy is guaranteed by the us constitution, she can have an abortion while the fetus is not alive capable, that is, the gestational age does not exceed 28 weeks before the decision of the supreme court question the legality of abortion. it was decided at the state level in 30 states abortions were completely banned in 16 were severely limited. and only four are freely allowed. the resonance is gigantic in the usa throughout the western world, why will we talk about this to the wonderful specialists victoria zhuravleva head of the center for north american studies and imo victoria hello, tell me

why the actual topic of abortion is clear that it is important for society, but it literally blew everything up and the main thing became. here is such a watershed into two, as it were, groups of people. in general, this topic has been difficult for american society for many long decades and the decision of the supreme court. as if periodically expected, that is, with every change, the increase in the conservatism of the supreme court in society all the time surfaced. here is the expectation. now it will be canceled now it will be canceled and it seems to me that this is a decision, but as a mirror. here it reflects all the specifics of the american state and american society, it also reflects how political decisions are made in the united states, that is, how

high the role of the judicial system is in them, then, uh, how divorced the state is from society, because if we look at social polls, then 74% societies do not support the decisions of the supreme court 74%, and 61% of americans believe that abortion should be legal. there are all sorts of nuances. from what month and so on, but in principle, 61% of american society believes that women should have the right on abortion, including the republicans and, accordingly, the question arises. and why? for whom this decision was made, and here is another point that this decision reflects is the huge politicization of the entire social agenda in american society in the seventy-third year, when the decision to legalize abortion was made, it was made in response to a social request, but it was largely advanced by the medical community,

because the percentage of female mortality was very high in the century of criminalization of abortion, it really was just a monstrous situation and the supreme court made the decision that society needed. and now the supreme court has made a decision that the political elite of the conservative wing of the republican party needs. here. this is what revolts society, why such a resonance and what generally reflects the essence of what is happening today in the united states this is the idea that with this decision not only begin, but then, so to speak, cancel everything that the progressives considered the achievement of the last few decades there, well, up to uh, the legalization of same-sex marriage. well i think that legalization of same-sex marriage is next in line. this is the very first thing that may be, because it was

generally hardly accepted. and if you look, in principle, society has an ambiguous attitude to this far, not in all states this is accepted. i mean, it 's kind of brand new. well, there is a new change in the agenda, which can be affected, but hmm it seems to me that they started from the very loudest and the most destructive , there are two points of view. i came across one that it is, well, in general, such a collapse of models or a model these delays of balances are moving towards cancer, and the other is vice versa, that this is just a very painful, but necessary such a reorganization that will give rise to a new, healthier society. who do you think is more right polarization? paradoxically, but this is something that keeps the political system from changing too abruptly, that is, here we say, well, they often criticize yes in

today's pro-situation for radicalization, but in reality. uh, look here is an example of a trump who came up with the decision to break everything change. he cannot do this, but in conditions of tough opposition from another part of society. the same comes with biden with a huge social agenda, which for the liberal side of society is exactly what they want, but 48% of american society does not believe that they are ready for such a major change. and here it is. ah, the polarity of opinions and, accordingly, the polarity of e political parties. it seems to be blocking, here, and the drastic changes that it can bring to the president. now the power is much more polarized and radicalized than society. this is the liberal-conservative dichotomy. she is obviously in the party, but she is more imposed on

society than she is in society in society. in fact, there is a very large variety between the far right and the far left and the middle. there they are more ready to agree and understand each other. although, indeed, the extreme poles speak different languages. and in general they are on different planets in different countries, if you look at the congress, then the largest faction is right. the republicans following her are the left-wing democrats. they speak in different languages. they do not allow to carry out what one side does not allow the other to carry out its agenda, and in society there is a middle ground. and in general, society is set up for dialogue, we live in a completely different legal culture. we don’t really sometimes understand that america. well , they say that america is a country with weights. and that, in general, the judiciary is the main one there, what does this mean for the political system. these are pluses or minuses in terms of this stability. it means that the separation of powers, which we often know as america, is a symbol of the separation

of powers, which implies not only a division into the executive legislative, but also an extremely large role for the judiciary. the supreme court of the united states is the highest court of appeal and can accept any case from a lower court. at the same time, the supreme court has the right to make not only legal, but also political decisions, for example, to decide whether the us constitution complies with the normative and legal acts of the us congress or the federal government's court itself selects the issues that will often be considered, they are related to the most pressing social issues. usually, about 100 cases a year go through a hearing out of eighty thousand requests, the decision is binding and cannot be argued and they can greatly change the lives of americans, for example, racial segregation in schools was abolished by the supreme court in 1954. each of the nine

judges is appointed by the president of the united states for life after approval in the senate, the vacancy appears only when the referee dies or serves himself. it is conventionally customary to divide the studio stand into conservatives and liberals, that is, nominees from republican or democratic presidents under trump. judging by the republicans, there were six against three democrats before that, the ratio was five against four, but sometimes the chairman of the court, republican john roberts , voted along with the liberals and the case was decided not in favor of conditional conservatives, for example, this is how the decision was made to ban dismissal from work for unconventional sexual orientation. very often, the vector of social development of society is changed by decisions of the supreme court. and this, of course, is a

moment that the executive legislature is also forced to take into account. it is paradoxical that at the time of the president and congress the supreme court never intervenes, but these are such indirect decisions. and like, for example, the abolition of the legalization of abortion, this is actually interference in the agenda of a democratic president. that is, it turns out to intervene and very very actively, and here again we recall that that the us political process is organized through parties and in conditions where parties are radicalized. it turns out that the president and? it is not always possible to be sure that he can carry out his social agenda, because the supreme court was formed before him. and if here he is, as he is already conservative, then the supreme court will have its own agenda. and it turns out that in the state there are at least three agendas - the agenda of the president, the agenda of the congress and the agenda of the supreme court, everything becomes very

complicated, as if the ideal idea that a court outside of politics is absolutely irrelevant for america . no, he is not out of politics. thank you very much victoria zhuravleva from immo was with you. the revision of the decision on abortion in the united states caused a controversial reaction from the supreme court - it is written on the starting pistol that opened a new civil confrontation. drawing by steve brin bill bramham from the liberal camp is dissatisfied there not only with abortions, but also with the permission to carry weapons in new york calmly, the lady says to her husband i put contraceptives in the gun, apparently a hint the fact that gun conservatives do not check michael ramirez and the traditional donkey as a symbol of the democrats on the poster says death to the supreme court, and humanity is written on the stomach. and then donkey says i need an abortion. harry warvel about the historic

court decision, death mourns the retrial. rowe against wade, a deeply conservative image and a f-branca hint at trump's return to big politics. he uses the famous biden meme. i did it, and raising the price of gasoline. it's right there on the poster. case review.ru vs. wade, gun permit in new york trump man says i did it. something else remarkable happened this week russia did not make payments to service its bonds, as the western media happily wrote the first default of russia on foreign obligations since 1918, the analogy is beautiful, but wrong provisional governments

illegal. and now the russian federation wants to pay and is ready, but it is not allowed. actually lenders. having blocked all the ways of passing money, it is possible to imagine that creditors were imbued with the spirit of not acquisitiveness, but it is difficult, which means that a landmark policy has finally won the economy. and if we add here the discussion at the big seven, the introduction of an administrative ceiling on oil and gas prices begins to smell of infusion. up not for the sake of speed, but the current we will, who sent me to the global gas plan. here is the share of the aforementioned bolsheviks and never dreamed of. it was an international review. see you. business, i am now reviewing all expenses and

i will reduce the menu well, that now there is something to save on. open a free business account with alpha bank. connect advertising in yandex.business, and we will transfer you 10,000 rubles. we will answer all questions. everything for cleanliness and hygiene in the house, as well as for your beauty with summer discounts up to 45% on

wildberries we understand you, therefore in housing lottery raffle apartments. by the sea super prize 700 million, housing lottery. open the door to your dream. the largest bank is a bank that exists even in the smallest corner of russia and its applications work reliably for everyone with this bank credit card, an advanced level even for beginners and any resident of the galaxy can become clients of this bank , that's what the largest bank post bank is a recipe for natural taste is born on the banks of the don river here, the coolness of the river and the summer sun give the life-giving power of the don barley to the main secret our non-alcoholic beer don southern is a non-alcoholic recipe created by southern nature.

groups of russian troops that are involved in a special operation in ukraine were checked by the chief of the general staff personnel from the ministry of defense on our air four settlements of the dpr survived