a-a a person who cites historical facts a person who appeals to historical memory a person who knows history. and this is not a rarity in world practice today, but the very key speaker that he should have been, given that now the central

topic is the post-soviet space. russia ukraine can comment on this agenda as a result. unfortunately, i agree on the screen, but unfortunately the media in israel partly belongs to our fugitive oligarchs, whose position is good the western community about the american one, and i have been raising this issue in various forums for several years now. as closed, both military and civilian. unfortunately i used to stand against all public opinion. this is not the first time, not the second time, moreover, it was only my leader who said no when the american embassy wanted to know my opinion for 3 1/2 hours. i explained to them the same thing that i explain, here in russian. i have explained it to you without fine as i see the situation. so i claim me claim ko i can only be charged for why i ca

n’t do it, but i don’t succeed in everything in my country. if i could do everything my country would look different. so i took it, i generally achieved it, but not all of me. did i hear what you said correctly, that a country that is part of the western community does not meet the high standards of freedom of speech and the standard of journalism. of course, all the time to talk, but i have, but i still have a unique experience in the world, which almost no one else has. i opposed the a country that is not democratically trying to give freedom of speech, both in the soviet regime, and today, and in the united states and in israel. so from all sides i know this problem and i can compare today about no concept close to freedom of speech

in the west, says impossible. this is contempt for the concept of journalism and freedom of speech, today's today 's clamping. freedom of speech. it is different and for the worse so that it was in the fifties in the soviet union, and if then we returned with mufflers. today it is much more efficient than dryers and is something that comes from the heart. i wish you jacob with all my heart the same sparkling ethers. what do you have in russia on russian state television in israel, let's take israeli state television and will such broadcasts be good? it 's not bad. thank you, we will not be on such a level, as in russia, but for other reasons, you know, and and the last thing i would like. this is what

is happening in the west now when they demand the czech republic well, and only the czech republic from russian students to sign some statements of sadza and protest against what the russian government is doing or what? this is reminiscent of the pressure of the holy inquisition of the middle ages on the jews to give up their beliefs to give up their faith sign that you do not support them and we will accept you. as people of the second class anyway, but still then you can exist in society. this is the same. this is the same holy inquisition. only now i don’t burn at the stake, then they burned it when at the stake are the same ancestors of those who make today, including in the czech republic. i want to remind you who the czechs burned at the stake in their time. unlike

the bastard today, he did not agree to give up his faith in his beliefs and the czech republic burned him. yakovich, here in our country there is a whole galaxy of people who are well aware that it is time to betray this foreseeing. at the same time, they hide behind alcoholism for an abomination. and not so long ago , our authorities loved them so passionately, our liberals lived in poverty, they were given money by everyone. here look at one such bastard, who can’t be called a traitor to the motherland and a degraded alcoholic cattle by a certain vasily. well, maybe, in your opinion, stop the war today or whoever yes, only defeat

and, in fact, in fact, that was russia's chance. i think the soviet union would lose the war , lose the war of the nazis, and then the hitlers would become. naturally, all the same , sooner or later, the combined forces won out for you from russia, which remained the losers in that war. she started like now germany yes here is this slumped little man. this abomination expresses these views of an entire stratum. so i read on the telegram channel that another citizen, by the way, an acting teacher at one of the universities receiving gigantic state support, argues in exactly the same way when they say, well, then you would not have been born our answers. what do you mean, i'm not jewish. and that you don’t feel sorry for the jews, he says, well, probably it’s a pity. here is all this pony, which all the 90s in our country

spoiled all these berezovsky mongrels all this the nonentity that was here was a citizen poet, who so carefully raised the project to collect all this scum and send them once on an excursion so that they could see what a german concentration camp was in operation, so that they went through all the stages and realized all the meanness of their words. even you are their alcoholic vile venal. insignificant brain, maybe something shuddered. and even more i'm interested in, when is finally their curators at various levels of russian power. this is how they call and say. well, are you happy with what kind of dump they brought up, which i poured into the ears of the russians for decades, who raised them to the height of the information ladder? now you will not find, not a single one to blame, everyone will say, yes, well, well, well, stop it well, why are you

looking like that, whom did you produce? remind me who was talking the same nonsense, bastard bykov remind me who else is talking. look at the lists of those who pretend to be economic leaders and now hang out in the west high sitting cabinets are being cleaned. at least you 'll be able to play. your indignation is justified, well, as it were these people are probably on the surface. this is not even very not very surprising much more frightening. well, it's not scary. in any case, it's annoying to say the least. here i go around moscow, here are the billboards. there, corporal petrov, a fighter of the russian armed forces

, a participant yes, there is lieutenant magomedov all this is wonderful. well, how does a billboard turn over mortgages at 0.5% apartments in new khimki? well, i have a question for people who do this. they generally they understand, in general, they seem to understand what is happening. but if you, if you feel sorry for the money, well, you gave an order, probably, well, so to speak, well, if you feel sorry for the money, you better not put these portraits of our guys at all. well, this is the most natural disgusting, but it says what it says about the internal state of society. that's what's scary. here they are not performing. they are not, as they say, not nowhere. no. it is moreover, probably, where it is necessary and keeps quiet. but here, well, it's, well, it's

obvious, but a person is a caring person, at least someone who understands will not do it, or you will do the whole. well, board to be there. our military guys either don't do it at all. well, well, well, so to speak, save money apartments. these are like his, uh, mortgage there pantyhose, please, then you are already earning money in this problem. you understand this is the problem. i am always alexander mikhailovich with great pleasure. listen, i agree with him. he gives some answers to my questions. i am, well, probably alexander mikhailovich due to my official position. no, not everything how to formulate, maybe, or i attribute it, but mine, so to speak, is very simple in order to do what you are talking about, it’s necessary that the control system is changing a lot, in general, you need to return with a horn to the soviet system of control, because to exchange for goods are not available today. i agree with you. i also think, why

do we sell oil and gas at all? there is a forest, probably branded so far, probably a forest hair dryer. yes , we're probably selling. yes, with all the same, they join nato and at the same time, as they say, we are with them we really can't buy anything. why do we need this money? then it’s easier to print them there and just to the workers or gas, whatever, let it gasify russia so to speak, some rather intelligent man says, we don’t have combine harvesters. there are dozens of such heels. well, probably right, but for this you probably need to arrange it a little differently. you see, there in the soviet union, as it was outwardly, there was an orc, that is, a different system was , you know, i say so. well, i understand that this is it, as soon as you talk about it,

because all this thirty-year-old political elite is completely brought up in an anti-soviet spirit for them. just monsters, well, listen, they cannot understand, this is the collapse of the entire system, but i want to say, guys, now we are talking about survival. now there is no more talk. now we are really talking about you not only surviving, but winning this war, because war is really fundamental to this war. this is a war for our resources, which in my opinion. it's so unconscious. it doesn't sound like it's being said, but it's actually obvious. suddenly the whole situation opened up. how much the world depends on our resources. and this is a war for this, but something needs to be done for this. that is, i would, as it were, return to the principle that someone took ped said. in short, what color is the cat? the main thing is to catch mice correctly, well, strictly speaking, where the market works works where the market does not work for you correctly?

you say that the state planning commission is needed for this. call it not gosplans. you don't hate everything soviet name it and we love it. well, because we are marxists, we understand that with us he is also a good lunacharsky artist, by the way, he was for god with might and main. well, it wouldn't hurt to be an artist. well, you know, they are no longer there, so no one can have them, and so on. this is so, in short, for this you need to change consciousness. apparently, it is necessary to change to update the elite, frankly speaking, the political one. well, there are people who are simple. of course, they are able to understand this, they will not understand, do not hope for this. do not rely on the fact that they will understand someone, and someone just fundamentally will not

understand. there's nothing you can do about it, but we really are. well, let's just say in a revolutionary situation. we have such a situation. i'm far from saying so. i believe that we historically must win, but for this we need very serious changes. including the historical efforts of entrepreneurs, in order to win historically, it is necessary to make historical efforts. absolutely nothing in itself did not intensify. now e you said a good phrase. how will the series end feeling that the author of this series? i talk a lot, i'm not an enthusiastic person, but as a believer, i'm absolutely convinced that there is an author of the series. he speaks now. he doesn't know where. this is what happens when you write a script. yes, and so to speak, that's where to move him went to smoke and you think you stand thinking where along some such radical route to a nuclear war, there are options, or vice versa,

a happy ending. suddenly, everyone saw the light and sat down at the negotiating table. agreed to satisfy the claims. we made some compromises. understood that the russian position is obvious and all the talk that putin i heard. yes, putin has been preparing war for a year. it's clear he wasn't ready. listen, putin has been convincing these minsk agreements for eight years, against which, frankly, there are many on this program who spoke out. and in general, the patriotic public of russia was against it, because they were beneficial to ukraine, they were russia more than that moment. if sancho here shouted all these years always putin if they were executed they a huge danger for him as a politician, because the application would have accused him of betraying the interests of the russians, that he was waiting for the russian world, and this would be serious, so blaming putin for preparing this one, but it’s

pointless on the contrary . for 8 years he tried to make sure to say that they would fulfill the agreement, which is unprofitable for him, so this is complete nonsense, but here i like it. these are the turns of this great playwright with erdogan. he is, of course, an outstanding person, yes, which i wanted to praise erdogan dagan, and mind you, i was in turkey 100 years ago. i have retrospectives. the company has not been to resorts since then, i don’t go, so to speak, but we must give him his due, that he is amazed at his incredible charisma and, in general, his mind. well, that's all, what he did now with the swedes from e and from the finns. when he missed them. after that he said, and now guys. here let's 70 kurds. here immediately. you see, in this there is not just his political, as it were, the benefit of which is understandable to him. well, there is also an inner one, i understand

a state of absolutely internal contempt for the west. here's contempt, because he now put them out as complete prostitutes, complete, you see, they have to, and they will betray. they wo n't go anywhere. you. well, that means, that is, they gave people shelter, they have values ​​​​they have something to say, they seem to have all this around and now he said, well, here come on, well, there is, of course, nothing to eat you will. i am absolutely not enough to consider that mr. erdogan is a friend of russia there, despite the fact that he is an outstanding really a leader. he's part of nato and so on and so forth, but i think there's one more thing to it. this conflict is increasingly acquiring the scale of this conflict, the outlines of a global conflict. west eurasia the west is even wider than the east therefore, absolutely everything is mixed up in it. note

there are no ethnic and confessional affinities, all slavs, all orthodox are against us for muslims on our side, except for belarusians. well, i told them yes, except for belarus, serbia, so to speak, well, as it were, too, forced, well, so to speak, well, it doesn’t matter, well, mind you all everyone who is there greece orthodox bulgaria romania orthodox all all slavs. this does not mean that ukrainians and i are orthodox slavs. uh, there is a war. so , the muslim world, by the way, sympathizes with us one way or another and helps us. i'm not talking about russian muslims who are passionately fighting there, and not only. and central asia, kazakhs , uzbeks, that is, it takes on the character of this global east-west conflict, in which, of course, turkey’s place is actually on this side it is not yet a fact that in the end they will not turn out to be

not because they love russia, but because this is a fundamental conflict between two really eternal rivals. and if russia loses in this conflict, then the whole east will lose, and they understand this very well, therefore, as they say, this is our great playwright he is now in no one. he smokes in some thought, but i am sure that he will make the right choice when he sits back at the beautiful desk. and what will the political demiurges say, but i think, of course, erdogan will give us, at the first opportunity, just a question. it is how much you can rent us. he will do everything for this, not if he does not treat them with very great sympathy. i think handsome has much less sympathy for him, because there is more to rake and lose than turkey in its history. our country did not lose from any, and all these wars are not a matter of the political will of the rulers personally, but

an uncontested geopolitical situation in the brigane, which simply cannot be different, either they or we are here, we take advantage of the situation of their conflicts. they take advantage of the situation of our conflict, historical crossroads often arose, but they always end up with our turkish partners making a choice in favor. one block is simple, because the choice in favor of the russian block will finally end with the fact that constantinople will acquire the name of tsargrad and will be a russian city, as all our tsars wanted, who have always strived for this, you know , they began to talk about what is in the west now again, we are always called some flawed , weak country, apparently. this educational policy, that less theory is needed, less philosophy and more concentration on applied and exclusively technical specialties, gave its result to western countries, they stopped reading even their own philosophers. not that they now

act as strangers directly in accordance with the work and with the treatises, let's say invertoeku, who singled out the signs of urfascism and one of these main signs was that rivals are always considered both incredibly weak and incredibly strong. i mean, he's so weak. that we sneeze and he will not be, but at the same time he is so strong that he can enslave us, destroy us and bring us to our knees. they live and move in full accordance with these treatises, and , apparently, they are not very familiar, or they are familiar and took this as the basis for their activities. you know , the lecture was canceled not so long ago. interesting story enough. uh, such a german biologist maria olbrach was supposed to speak in the gumball university of a fairly famous university, but canceled her lecture, because the whole essence of her scientific activity boils down to the fact that she

proves that there are two sexes in nature. and because of what you imagine. yes, it's so outdated. imagine him, she was supposed to speak at boomball university, there were demonstrations by left-wing liberals. against her with demands, they don’t let her into the territory of univer yes, because she dehumanizes and inflicts incredible insults on the transvestite and other, i don't know all kinds. eh, these perversions that are listed there, because there are a lot of them; these letters do not end with the alphabet that is listed there. well, it means that with such a comrade she inflicts some terrible ones. ah, mental anguish. she was not allowed to speak at the university. and here you need to understand that it was not a rally, it was going to hold. yes, she was not going to carry out any calls there. this is a scientific lecture. she was supposed to give academically, uh, lectures like that on the subject. so

the question arises, liberals are people like we they are always accused of making it easy for you. you are there, simply, you believe in some ossified ideas of your own. and we, as people are progressive, we rely on the street. we rely on arguing that we are so critical, but you do not allow any criticism. well, here you are, let's go ahead and speak. they would come, maybe they would present their theses and say, here, for example, i’ll show you this one right now. here is the official june 19th. i now served my country. as deputy assistant secretary of state for disposal of this fuel and waste in the department of energy's nuclear power administration . this is a boy or a girl. what gender is this? i don't understand these varieties, so freak answer freak in every way. it's just me being an old man. how long have i been living i have only seen either we or the same, if they explain to me, that's all the rest - how is it? well, that 's kind of the part in america that they express,

i think there's a lot. here you can still show the american selections was better visible. i'm 32 but i'm with you too in solidarity. i also think that there are only two and they. i don't have everything else for me. this is some form of madness, but still. uh, they don't want to listen, they don't want to discuss it. they uh, you have to understand that liberalism is uh, it is absolutely definitely not a philosophy. this ideology is completely devoid of. whatever the possibility of criticism, because it is already completely built on axioms that do not even try to discuss, prove, somehow subject to critical reflection. it's just a declaration one after another and all this ideology. it is based on lies from the very beginning. that's any postulate of liberalism does not correspond to reality, neither nature nor the

world that surrounds us. and that's precisely the ideology that everyone here agrees with, which is, well, appalling, that they're unacceptable. see how she manifests herself within our country. here i am very closely following the change in the discourse of our e, representatives of the liberal hmm camp, such a camp inside the country has now become very popular. they began to support ukrainian children. i can’t say anything bad, because children need to help all children, but i have only one question. they do not exist children in the donbass, these children do not exist, for you , these children did not exist for 8 years. they were not subjected to terrible crimes by ukraine, these children did not go through suffering, you didn’t have to sell something there in order to direct this money to help these children, it never occurred to you to talk about these children to do something for them. now, now i have friends they have such social project. uh, it's called distance

speech therapy, and they work with children from the donbass who have lived for eight years. e in areas that were constantly subjected to shelling by the armed forces and deal with the speech defects of these children. they will tell terrible things that children in the third and fourth grade cannot lay out words into syllables. they constantly have difficulty persuading letters there. let's say these are my friends. they didn't expect the ministry of education to now say and engage in. or the ministry health will send them there. these are the real representatives of civil society, because they know their mission is to make people's lives better. i don't know who their people are their people. this is the population of our country. these are our compatriots who live there and that's the first thing. we must help them and we think about them, otherwise we have some kind of civil society that worries life, anyone, anywhere, but not their own, they absolutely do not care about their own, they are aimed at working off. uh, whatever agenda they

aimed at criticizing day and night, the actual statehood. own tradition of social and political institutions, whatever. yes, but do nothing to make life in the country better. so i 'm telling you now, please, er, the number of tasks that we have to solve in the liberated territories. you do not wait there, but the russian federation is now leading them into russia, or will they be independent republics or what? what's the difference to you? russian people live there, they have a lot of problems. now a huge number, please contact your counterparts in the field. find a way to show support and devote all your resources to making these people's lives even one percent better. better then you really will be representatives of civil society. otherwise, you simply represent the interests of foreign states, which at the moment set their goal to officially declare this the

collapse of russian statehood, their other goal is the present moment and enough with you then it will be in accordance with this. but it will only do something, who are we showing such unprecedented kindness that the hair is worth it. if the way they deal with our entrepreneurs, they would deal with traitors to the motherland, everything would be fine in our country, but how will they look at us, so that our pre-trial detention center is clogged with entrepreneurs. they are traitors. something needs to be changed in the conservatory. need a little. the angle of view, entrepreneurs will change, just release, but traitors must be dealt with and dealt with seriously.

well, this time, since here they touched again on my favorite topic. yes, about what's up there. do you even think about what will happen, yes, when the author of the series, but you know ours. at least, the author of the series, as it were, yes, the god in whom i believe there. he doesn't write the script. he knows he will be leaving. well, this is understandable, yes, but here i am saying, he is alone, but i believe in him, someone, maybe, believes in something else. i don't know, see, but he doesn't write shows, although he knows the future, he gives people freedom of action and most often looks with sadness at how they use this freedom here, therefore, as it were, there is no fatal predestination here, therefore, if there is so little to digress into such lyrical ones, so to speak , some further, can, for example, let's say the current confrontation end with an end? sveta yes , maybe maybe, including so to say quite

to herself in accordance with those scriptures, in which, as it were, which form the dogmatic basis, at least of christianity, because if we talk about revelation, she is the theologian, as a matter of fact, there in black and white it is written that you who, well, if so, here, by and large, that just those who oppose god will establish world power. this world power will collapse. yes, and the second coming of christ, as it were, yes, bring victory, but before that there will be the establishment of a global e, anti, divine power, which will be characterized by wars, yes, pseudo pseudo-truth and absolutely total global power, so can this be the beginning of the end? but we, in principle, and still in this in this, as if the process were present in any case, yes, maybe we're on the eve of that as well. it's possible, but it all depends not on what, uh , comes up with, so to speak, an auto-scenario at the top, but on how we turn, ah, or don't turn these events around. yes, that's why, so to speak, the exodus may be both final and terrible, but at the same time for me as

a christian, it doesn't matter how he comes to the victory of truth. here, maybe already as if i did not see it in this world. yes here. well, let's see from that, then i hope they will give us this opportunity. yes, there may or may not be. may be, we can go to some other stage of history, which, so to speak, yes, uh, will allow more people to save their souls, because in the end there are salvations of these souls. in fact, the main goal. in this sense, by the way , i will also argue a little from the point of view that there is absolutely no ethnic religious background here. here they say the slavs and the orthodox against the orthodox slavs. i would say so. it's uh, it's kind of, kind of. you can talk about it, but it's a little, so to speak, without deepenings, because i, in this sense , am, as it were, in touch with a large number of people, as it were, that they write from ukraine from greece and safon, for example, where the monks live, i will tell you so. in fact, those who believe in god are rather on our side. those who do not believe in god are more likely to be against us. and here this

watershed passes here, because formal orthodoxy or not orthodoxy, formal slavism or non-slavism does not mean, in fact , the designation of real faith in god and does not means, so to speak, actually a real location. here on these two sides. you can put on yourself, so to speak, five crosses, as it were, yes, and it will not. it means that it’s okay, and so on, to be a slav by blood, but at the same time to say that i’m ashamed that i’m russian, and so on and so forth, you understand, here is this factor, if you dig deeper, as if, it seems to me, he a little more serious right here are the same muslims, yes many of them why rather on our side, because they are in the western world in form, avant-garde, the destruction of a society based on faith in god, not because they, so to speak, maybe you know there for this political paradigm or against this political one. they see , feel, justify for themselves, as it were, yes. at least those who are believers and this position of theirs that america and the west they see as the avant-garde destruction of the traditional world, in which faith in god but if not the most important thing, it is very important therefore. ponies rather on this side the same

applies to ukraine yes, formally orthodox side. let's be honest. yes, uh, to be frank, yes of post-soviet ukraine as well as post-soviet russia to a large extent. these are countries that have got a chance to revive orthodoxy, but not necessarily reviving it. i do not see, for example, orthodox people among those who today are in charge of this situation in ukraine. who is there from the orthodox really. here are orthodox christians. who defines this discourse? yes there are no such people there, there are no such people, but people with whom , for example, i communicate, including within the ukrainian orthodox church. many of them are simply afraid or unable to speak out. yes, actually is rather on our side. so, well, i know just by correspondence on some things that the public public sphere does not go there, so i will tell you that here this line of confrontation is more likely, just it is completely determined by revelation and it is the theologian and this apocalyptic thinking when those who are ready to believe in god and in metaphysics are more likely on this side. and those who think it's what it's like atavism they are rather on the other side. look even how it would be in our country, so to speak, in

this sense. uh, like the bulk of conditionally liberal oppositionists. these are people rather, non-believers or actively atheistically minded. yes, those who are on this side, roughly speaking, they are more or less believers, or at least respect tradition, respect tradition. it says something, it seems to me, it tells me in my personal view. again, we are here, i do not impose on anyone. we can argue, but in my opinion, if you dig the depth is precisely this in the depths, and on other levels, everything else is ideology , the economy and all that and so on, since this topic has been touched upon. i think it makes sense to search, but at the same time, yes, it means that the move can be the most catastrophic. if you go back so to speak, well again for again. i'm speaking for orthodox christians. this catastrophe will end in victory. in any case, another question is who sees it, who will not see it, but in any case, sooner or later to see everything in one state or another. well if there is a return, so to speak, of political economies and so on, after all, the west must understand a simple thing, that they are now looking at the conflict in ukraine, they are looking, so to speak, that something is working out for us , something is not working out. extrapolates, but perhaps the conflict with russia, we

must clearly understand that if the use of nuclear weapons is impossible in ukraine, then in a conflict with the west it will be guaranteed, it will be guaranteed, because they are now building their tactics, so to speak they began to arrange, based on the fact that there could be a conventional war with russia, in which it would lose. yes or let's say that the modernization of nato's potential can lead to the fact that they will receive such superiority in nuclear weapons delivery that it will completely nullify, as it were, our potential. i think, as if here, uh, all sorts of different, so to speak, some kind of equivocations and so on and so forth should be a thing of the past. they must understand very clearly. yes, they may attempt to destroy russia, but yes, this is for europe and for america yes, the wildest catastrophe will be fraught, which will bury the concept of the west as a society, e. we generally have uh, more, uh, who understands all this? and, by the way,

it's interesting, that's what yes, they really chose russia as their main goal now. uh, in my opinion, for two, so to speak, for two serious reasons, the first reason is that russia really so really. by the way, historically initially we present some kind of alternative to domination and in order to destroy this alternative. yes, as if they tried, and this way and that, and now they believe that this can only be done by military means, but, and the second is more such a more tactical moment, still to the americans. it was necessary to keep europe to itself, and the development of a conflict-free situation in the united-russian continent, in any case , dragged europe away from them, because the beginnings of a security system that included europe and russia, sort of, yes. well, this is not what actually destroyed global dominance, but the question is: what, and could it have been avoided? in my opinion, tactically, probably, at different stages, it was possible to build some other combinations. there in the same fourteenth year, but strategic, most likely, this could not be done, because the west is in its own. in its struggle for global dominance,

any growth is perceived as a challenge by an example, for example, the inclusion of china in the nato concept. in fact, china is presented with only one thing he has become too successful he has become too strong, he does not threaten anyone by and large , but he has healed too well. he thinks something incredible about himself. yes? this is you, in fact , if you translate some kind of yard language, he began to think a lot about himself, so he needs to be bent. it says, what about that, in fact, some kind of conflict with the west. from our point of view, it was absolutely inevitable if we wanted to develop at all, but proceeding from this, in in this case, yes, so to speak, of course, our thirty-year orientation to align the entire economy and all politics and all culture towards integrating the west in this direction raises big questions. we built everything. why are we in such a difficult situation now, because we built everything, basically only in this direction for 10 only for this. yes. it was also ideologically definite, because many in their heads are secondary, it’s not at all the best, so to speak, right? not so inescapable, but in

including, so to speak, financial and economic. and most importantly, it was determined. that's the unwillingness to actually be, uh, the masters of one's historical destiny. here we are ukraine. there we scold, we say, ukraine is completely secondary, non-sovereign, it surrendered itself there. one of the main reasons for everything that happens to us is not the desire to be responsible for its historical fate. and let's stupidly build these pipes there. and let's build pipes, build connections with that world. we'll talk money on it, and that's all and you don't need to do anything else, but in order to build in civilization, you need to do much more much more than just signing lucrative contracts much more than just, so to speak, a supply chain and other things. for this, historical creativity of a huge scale is needed for our elite. all these 30 years were not enough. and now, by the way, hmm, it was not actually abandoned. and by the way, coming back to that, and now i fully support what you are saying, i would like to draw attention to it. not only to the fact that you have been saying this for many years, but to the fact

that look why the west is by and large understandable is transparent and consistent and succeeds. they have already gobbled up almost everything that was from the soviet union in the european part. they ate it up. they methodically, consistently acted towards the litas and nastya by and large. they've almost digested it. what didn't work out was that putin came and then they began to hurry a little. but what you say is terrible, what needs to be understood by ours, but we still don’t offered their own long-term policy. we have tactics, but no strategy. but where are we going? look where we are leading, and the west knows where it is going and where it is leading us. well, first of all, let's do something. eh, so to speak, once again we note that this was a historical mistake, because the lack of diversification of this movement, that is, its diversity. yes, it led, including to this addiction, uh, but apart from everything

else, so to speak, apart from everything else. this applies, by the way, to issues of ideology. here i am er personally, er, of course, a supporter of the fact that all politics should be permeated with some kind of philosophical understanding and partly ideology, no doubt, it is extremely important that i go into logic. although this word is all discredited. it seems to me that she still needs some simpler russian word. it is not because russian is not something that needs to be done to the best of the best russian, but simply because we are all a term. it's pretty much already bearing such, well, negative impacts. how fashionable to say so poisonous toxic or whatever you want you can call it a different worldview, goal-setting there, whatever you like, but more so to say, in such a word, which does not unambiguously carry itself. eh, this is some kind of negative value, but nonetheless. here , too, you know from one extreme. no need to fall into another the fact is that just in fact, our whole life is 30 years. these, including the economic model, were deeply and ideologized. just an ideology. it wasn't ours. she was deeply ideologized, and in this sense, if these are about the economy, here i am too i support this discussion, which was here, so to

speak, including alexander mikhailovich spoke, in fact. now the economy is not needed. ideology is not needed, ideology, the main ideology is to achieve a result. the good thing is that it produces results. set, so to speak, a goal for yourself and determine which tools, regardless of how they fit into a particular school , give results, give results well, do not give results. it doesn't matter any way to say it, yes, how it is interpreted, but you know in uh, it means in coordinates of some ideologies there or schools that were there in the nineteenth xx century, and so on and so forth, uh, other things, so to speak , an essay. therefore, in this sense, by the way, i just think that we need to get away from the infinite here of this tossing with each other. here it is in soviet , this is anti-soviet. this is like soviet, this is like not in soviet we need a result, regardless of , so to speak, what it was called in the past in the past. it could be called whatever you like, and one of the problems i think with the modern one, including economic bloc. he is

still living in the past. he is in the past. he didn't move. this milestone on february 24 is worse than that. it seems to me that he didn’t even cross the border of 2014 inside. he lives on the deeds of the past. and by the way, speaking in a defensive degree. here in this one, which also inherited, there are still perestroika in the nineties. this, uh, means this dichotomy, so to speak, soviet anti-soviet and so on and so forth, in this case, all this should be forgotten, right? it is only possible that the one who does not understand this gives a result, at least it should say to vacate your position. yes, but here's what's missing, by the way. it's even said here. look, the ministry of finance is fighting with the central bank and other things. let's be honest with the visual degree. this is war. she is self fighting for several boys. these are nanai boys. you know, there is such a number, as if a person gets into a suit, as if two or three are fighting, but in reality there is a serious lack. until now, we have said many times, well, until now these are the most important thoughts, but there is not enough open discussion on economic issues. well, no, you understand, no, that's all we are talking about here, it's all air. they are

there, roughly speaking, to solve some problems among themselves. here it is necessary to ask people this way or not. well, i don't have to, so to speak. i'm not an economist, as it were, yes, well, ask people, maybe there are other opinions. no there is. so, relatively speaking, the ministry of finance is the central bank, so to speak, there is, relatively speaking, some kind of higher school of economics, which has been powdering the bridge for many, many years, because of which we, including in largely because of them lost 300 billion, which by the way, could have something else. yes, for the same production jobs and so on, but besides them there are still people in this country , imagine, that's all. they do have an education. they, too, or rather, they. they love their homeland, and they believe that you yourself say that the challenges are incredible, yes, you need support. refer refer to an open discussion. yes, make a contest of these projects. i don't know why, because it turns out that way when you need support. you say the society should support you. and when you don't, you say. e, hello, in short, you are there yourself. we have our own here, we will figure it out without you . you won't figure it out without us, because you haven't figured it out already. and last but not least

, really. hey, the question is, have you figured it out or not? after all, in fact, if this is already quite back to the tactics of military operations, one of the big problems that we have, even though the military operation is all that happened after the liberal economic reforms in country, because the reduction of the army is the concept of a small mobile army, which will transfer, so to speak, a unit from one. another concept of low costs for these things is also in order, again, so to speak, from financial considerations and considerations that supposedly finances rule everything, as if it led to a number of negative consequences that we now have, including on fronts one of them is the strength. we don't have enough army. why? because their time was told, we are not we need such an army, why do we no longer have it. threats. at best, they will be small. so to speak, it is terrorist operations. we will solve all this. but it didn’t work out, which means that you, dear gentlemen, made a lot of mistakes in strategy and tactics

, which means that we need to radically change our approaches to everything, and a serious change is needed here. by the way, in order for this society to feel this dynamic. she this fracture. it is necessary to offer to provide, and then it will be possible talk about ideologies about everything, the rest about this in due time, we'll talk, as in a famous film, so to speak, right? well, congratulations, the lugansk people's republic has been liberated, although, as it was rightly said, security will only be if the ukrainian troops are moved at least 300 km from the border of the luhansk people's republic. i think somewhere in the region. san dini, a suburb of paris, is perhaps right there for them. the very place. with great interest, of course, i read arrestovich fantastic man, he is still convinced that luhansk, the lugansk

people's republic, has not been liberated and that everything is still wrong with the lisichansk people, but so that he has no doubts, please, here is a video, if now i don’t see arresters anywhere in the background, so that he confirmed that since this is the very center of lisichansk, that this is all wrong, that this is a hoax. by the way, also, so that there is no doubt, perhaps in the last settlement. uh, the luhansk people's republic and they hoisted this pokale now it's lisichansky where, and you were friends with the flag, and now the last settlement falls, the export is strictly blocked and i know victory so that no one has any illusions, in general, i understand that you look at it with interest, you remember , remember, such videos will appear very often. remember remember. and if europe

will lead badly, then in europe i recommend to look carefully carefully. and by the way, so that there are no illusions, we don’t give a damn about how much and what kind of military equipment, but they will put it in ukraine on here, so that there are no illusions, we don’t give a damn on lenglis, we don't care at all, because the task set by the supreme commander will be completed. yes, it hurts. yes, you use the resulting equipment to strike at our peaceful cities. and yes, nothing will save you. and nothing will help you, by the way, so that there are no illusions, how people treat us in the liberated territories. look, when in lisichansk the british tried, uh, to talk to the people and the answer they heard, where did it come from russia, right? britain and so do not write the truth

do not write the truth. well, they tied it up yesterday, they also have a different section, on the contrary, they want to help in ukraine why do we say that they unleashed no one else, because july 2, 2014 is a terrible date for those who generally understand at least something, this is when launched an air strike and when a large number of civilians , including children, died, but then europe did not pay the slightest attention to it, they did not care. yes, igor just now, when he was listening to your speech, caught himself thinking. if only all our officials were subject to the principle that you just announced in assessing their work, yes, before how to quit and go to the front. i think that we would have changes much faster in the mind of smersh, it's time to create, we

understand, this is already. i think it's already obvious . if i may, i would like to touch on two events that took place last week, which caused a wide response, so to speak. since in society, so to speak, in social networks everywhere this is a situation with an acute snake situation with the exchange captivity, with regard to the situation of the serpentine. although, we continue to call it a special war operation. and many are already calling it a holy military operation. well, i think we should already be aware of it, because there is a full-scale war going on and the war is not with ukraine. but the instructors are fighting with the nato bloc. western equipment is fighting, so to speak, the statement that the western americas are fighting. given this factor, so to speak, uh, a departure. since morning. take it from our military leadership there were reasons for that, the war does not consist of only victory. we would very much like the problems of this war, because it goes in an online format and any

actions or any so to speak, e moments cause almost panic or there is not e in the age of indignation. i would like to say so, that's more than you would like to reassure everyone that no tactical actions of ours on the leadership. they are not like this, they are the re- result will be the one that the president spoke about the results of the military operation. there will be the one that the president said or you need to turn and panic out of the blue retreated. so it was necessary to get long-range artillery , so to speak, to receive funds that well, why risk the lives of our soldiers? i don't understand what those comments are. to be honest, with the deepest image. you know, we are for the same goodwill. well, can you imagine that we made gestures to hitler for the second year? goodwill, motherfucker. give him grain, yes, after istanbul and everything that followed, including when i hear this expression, vladimirovich causes the most

indignation. come on. neat words of course, yes, everyone perfectly understands that they are getting heavier. we have very smart people. we have very smart people. everyone is well aware of departed, so it was necessary. so today we took a step back. tomorrow will be two ahead. so we protect our courts in life, i want to hear from ours they are from everyone. bastards it's the nazis. well, why why out of the blue to create problems? i don't understand it. go no. you see, when you hear, tin. good will. you start, you start, but inside you understand, do you understand ? again, some kind of agreements, some voluntarily, of course, but this is what i think, but this is just some kind of stupidity, you forgive me, please, but it’s possible to destroy the government quarter in kiev, how good will i want to say, yes, about it ukrainian joy. and the fact that the investigation means that they occupied, so to speak, an island. i think that he and who we are, therefore, there is no victory for

ukraine here. we're just saving lives. good will. in connection with the supply of a large number of nato equipment, you can finally go to hell mothers will destroy the entire civilian military transport infrastructure in western ukraine as a gesture of goodwill will destroy their own substations television repeater towers completely deprive the country of electricity, water supply communications. how good will it be with regard to the exchange of prisoners. yes? there have also been many conversations there, so about. i believe that this is one of the postulates. what has always held and stood russian liberty. this is the principle that russians do not abandon their own. i absolutely support it, as if inside me no, boiled and whistled, teeth. we must do everything to pull out all our guys and then the scum that we give in return. yes, she breathes on credit sooner or later. we will get to each of them and each and for each will get his own.

everyone will answer for everything he did, but today absolutely the right decision by any means to pull everyone into our guys, not a single person should be left, so that no matter what, no matter who we give in return. they say so, they i repeat once again for all their crimes. they will answer no one will escape punishment, but today the priority is the lives of our guys. regarding the situation in ukraine, well, you know two. in my opinion, the absolute is inadequate in the full in the truest sense of the word. this is johnson zelensky , led by a become senile biden. bluffing try to portray that they are ready to go all the way . i repeat again. i am deeply convinced that this, damn it, and those provocations that, at the command of the west, zelensky arranges by shelling peaceful cities from a military point of view makes no sense. yes but since they arrange a provocation, yes, it means in their

tasks. uh, they have the task of provoking us to respond. so they understand why we are waiting and they are forcing us. i understand that this is indignation of the public opinion of russian citizens. yes, that's all and so on. what kind of retaliatory action can be, what are you just talking about, this action is obvious, when we talk about belgorod this means. it should not be possible to strike, which means that ukrainian troops must be pushed back, at least 300 km in 30 km - this is where it is so kharkov must be russian, vladimir i, kharkov region, and in general, to hell, so that the nazi bastards would not be seen anywhere in the near approximation. why why, there is resistance, because i will explain too kindly, because you understand what is happening. uh, zelensky is located in kiev, there is a central ukrainian government and local authorities of the

local elite. yes, i can not power. there is a state they don’t tell that we will win now, that now the whole world is with us, that’s why so to speak, they are not forced to liberate these cities with such difficulty and with such difficulties, as soon as zelensky is liquidated or is forced to leave the country with the locals. the elites will be able to say that everything he escaped, so because of the city they will stop resisting. i'm not the same obvious things. why don’t we go this way, maybe there is some topic that i already spoke about in the last program, maybe there are some higher goals, about which you just don’t guess, and so say we we only look at the map of ukraine to understand why this is happening carefully glob on the world globe understands this differently. look , ukraine is conducting a terrorist release directed against the leadership, the liberated territories of ukraine are here recruiting assassins due to exile, to annoy the magazines and the territory of

russia we are just saying i am sure that we will respond, just not yet time. summer will be interesting. there will be a captivating rose on the windshield of my fiancé's car, my friend in the summer will capture.

nothing is impossible. we look, we always wonder where it all begins. now you will see everything.

but it's best to check. i understand that i am much more intelligently informed than any of us, so everyone understands perfectly well, it is necessary. we all need to calm down, trust the top political leadership to speak the truth, so to speak, for now, no matter how painful it is.