well, china is waiting for russian proposals for the entry of russian companies there, here we are just stalling, because well, we haven’t, experience has been gained, and the military has an understanding in china that we are still being pushed towards the military union, despite the

repeated statement that the time of unions, as china said, has passed, and china speaks openly about it, here are all expert articles, and such serious ones. i'm not saying now, some bloggers they publish one simple thing, that if any conflict around melting starts now, it doesn't matter, this is a military operation or lockdown of taiwan isolation. ah, our main ally. here will be russia and with him. therefore, we must support now. e, including e communications for military-technical cooperation. well, read, as they say, this air defense system and everything else, that is, china does not hide the fact that russia is a military ally? it would be nice, well, it's so simple that no one has any illusions. dmitry will answer. us here, of course, is such a story. i slightly disagree with the fact that our western partners completely removed the theses of victory over the battlefield on the battlefield, in reality, it all begins to resemble. i will overcome this ukrainian zrada , yes, they removed it, then returned it. i think the

magic wheel would be a bummer. yes, when we started talking about the ukrainization of western politics a couple of years ago, but i think that none of us imagined that it would be so deep. hmm, ukraine would be so deep. this is ukrainization here e despite the fact that i absolutely agree with the thesis of aphorism and hypocrisy of western politics, i only one thing worries. well, look at it all the time they taught that we will win the war for this , the world wins and there are a lot of all sorts of examples. and now i'm looking, and i don't see how they are going to win the world. i just don't see, i collect. i roughly imagine. how to want like well, going to win the world of china hmm somewhere even india well, i understand less. but, for example, how the americans are going to win the world. this is a

big mystery to me. and in this sense, i have a hypothesis. do they want to make this war forever? well, yes, it will burn out in ukraine, but you can set it on fire, for example, central asia will burn out in central asia, but there , faster than in ukraine, the people will choose to arrange it differently, so to speak. and let's light something in southeast asia, there are a couple of hearths. uh, in this sense, of course, the idea that you can buy time for reconsolidation, as the american political system of the economic system. and they need it judging by what we see on tv, by and large, they need 15 years. 15-20 years should go. this is the generation politicians, and hmm, it is not known who will come in the right, but, nevertheless, they need it for 15-20 years anyway. yes and this will be a canoe for 15-20 years. i'm so conditional biden. i imagine a centennial

biden. no, this is a good idea, in general we are, yes, i’m starting to come to such a rather difficult thought that, and biden is now the function of the president of the united states for the next 15 years, there will indeed be biden in quotation marks. yes, how was the raig, but reagan was also not the same actor from the film in the b category. and reagan was a kind of system. the one that the actor confused iran with iraq, in my opinion, the nicaragua old man, there and so on, but nevertheless there was a certain system that actually won the cold war. so i think that now there will be a peaceful respite. you are still a system of such a collective baidan, although most likely they will merge their grandfather, the farther away you are, the more i look, grandfather becomes a burden for them. starts to do business, when he wakes up and begins to take there remnants of their own decisions, they are not at all there, what, for example, periodic

phrases about the supply of arms. i think they just wrote to him, he read no in this regard, well done, where else is this person who reads all the letters in a row, right? well, really, that is, even technically. yes, i know your relationship, he is big, but nevertheless, he is still a person who, unlike the vast majority of current american politicians, has retained, firstly, the instinct of self-preservation. secondly, common sense, but here there is a question in another question is, oh well. yes, it is clear in 15-20 years. we'll be up to in multipolar world or we won’t find ourselves, most likely we won’t find ourselves there. if we behave like this and go like this, because this is it, the growing irresponsibility of high-ranking people. this thing is very dangerous, but in reality. behind this facade

of this irresponsibility, and this, as they say, hides very understandable things. everyone in the access zone has their own set of resources, which is not enough to be china's well-powered pole china trade routes. industrial power. there are some technologies whether china, on the basis of this set of resources , is not enough to be a polis of forces in a multipolar world, china needs to pump up military force and force projection, china must at least show something in terms of allied ties of the institution. russia is already a military force with this, by the way, they began to argue less before there, russia was all rusty. now, apparently, rust is starting to gradually leave the resources of logistics opportunities, which so far no one has challenged, despite fantastic investments. can we just this? we cannot become the pole of forces. we need a

powerful economic social system that ensures the social connectivity of the entire country, by the way, there are challenges for us in the near future. these will be challenges primarily internal challenge the internal connectivity of the economy, the united states has excellent projection opportunities. uh military force. the control of the majority on today's money is the day of the existing global institutions. only the trouble is that they are all degrading and even the global information society is starting to gradually crumble as it is introduced. e administrative regulation europe but this is europe - this is generally a big cancer. but by the way, there is also common sense in germany, the discussion, it turns out, yes, in germany people thought they watched it, germany because, it turns out to lose the status of either the leader of europe, in general europathy, germany, who did not say anything about this party from the bottom. there was a setup, but

we don’t know that they haven’t said this yet. well how do we know that the minister fighting johnson has stopped to two handsome young men, after which boris johnson's liver followed them. well , petrov and bashirov received extraordinary military training. it’s just that i’m now waiting for another stupid thing to happen from germany. when something like this happens again, it means that he says that the most important thing is, you’re even in another. they all know that they are under the hood. they all know that they are being watched, that they cannot hold on to security, life does not exist and that, no, it’s not even to be held. this feeling of always being allowed they are somewhere on another level in this sense. this is what worries me about permissiveness, hypocrisy and inability. limit stop the escalation of the use of such political confrontation, and,

unfortunately, a very bad combination, so multipolarity will probably be interesting for the time, but even before it, not only everything, yes, as klitschko says, and so that klitschko does not feel alone immediately after the advertisement we remind you the ability to read the president. all day listen and we are still over the brezhnev giggle here's to robinette jr. advertising. here, don't be offended. just don't be offended. this i am not broken by joseph robinet. biden jr. incumbent, united states of america i

won't do what they say to do. i 'll do it anyway, i'll tell you the story. i saw pope john sorry weak benedict of rome. paporinsky john the second i led, that is, john well, at least not with peter the keykeeper, otherwise i won’t be surprised at anything, this man could do everything, but of course, i’m sorry. like zaton reads as he reads. it should be noted that the percentage of women registered to vote is higher than that of men, end of quote. repeat line women are not devoid of electoral and political power. stands around ugora understands that something went wrong, but kamala harris and dronov because she herself is the

same, she turned on. she speaks absolutely normally, what he says, speaks well, it means she breathes, which means she is already good alive. here he is chatting with invisible people with serushniks. professional you know intelligence, we were able warn the world about what vladimir putin planned in ukraine you saw what he did you saw. thank you thank you and lost again. i'm heading that way. thanks, i think they're bullying this man. even somehow it is not a pity in one francovich. something is remembered. chekhov firm.

you know, they forgot all the time. well, not forgotten yet, but for now. unfortunately forget it's biden this while he walks. there is also one walking around, and muttering something all the time, spare me. from him. there are such words. you know this is what i think it is worse to supply the enemy with strategic raw materials, or at home here, and it does not matter. you have us glorify his political system. but, if we look at what we study in most of our educational institutions, and not only higher ones. we do not have democracy, in general, as a kind of theory. once upon a time, which arose there during the period of athenian democracy, which developed, namely in the form in which it exists in the west, is presented as the pinnacle of the development of political regimes. in principle, it is rendered separately. if you take a look at our courses, which are taught to most students, then there the chinese system is presented as an

outdated one-party, almost totalitarian model of our main strategic partner and practically ally, and all the best is almost perfectly connected with this system, which is falling apart, which is degrading, and for any objection will tell you. well, you know, you're telling us here, the west has been rotting for 100 years. well, it will rot for a long time. this is how it happens and what the majority of russian youth support. a special military operation and the fact that even the students, who are always quite rebellious here, are quite lazy. this is a big success. i'll tell you with this attitude. here alexey alexandrovich mentioned myanmar as a concrete example of the result. i remember everything in an old man's burmese way, and they have yes, yes, i understand, we do n’t do that. they have a very name for it. if you say so, you will be no near non-alist. tell

the family it will be right. i didn't get pricked like that. although i don't think they've yet led sans against me. vice versa. so, by the way, and for some reason here little is known about myanmat in russia. moreover, a special military operation was supported, moreover, we actively want to cooperate, but some russian diplomats block this cooperation for one reason, for which non-democratic regime? well, what are you, and he himself is the suji of an idol and in general a super-liberal know then they threw off and it is unlikely that the regime will be supported, moreover, uh, the government by all means. i want to cooperate, the result is wang and the minister of foreign affairs, china and china are already going there this plot is more actively occupied. what does russia do under a regime that was completely open to russia? here is the result. that is, these are not just some subjects that are taught in the classroom and that someone can somehow perceive. no it has quite obvious

practical and often. unfortunately, negative negative value to the question. and why are these politicians being presented here, this is a western political model, why is there no kind of russification of social sciences in our country, but not in the sense of ukrainization throughout the gentlemen to proclaim that we created everything here, but still , relying on our vision on our theory on our political role, they talk about technological superiority. the west is actually a strange thing. well , for example, if russia is right there, let’s say technologically, they make german cars better, nobody argues with this, and on this basis that we should copy their model, but if russia supplies gas, it doesn’t say, give it to us history. uh, as an option or if the russians were the first to discover antarctica. they do not demand that antarctica become part of russia , but, in principle, i somehow have an internal protest against each of your people. why would i so i specifically waited for your

reaction, when you have been driving german cars for many years. last time. they need to be bought in a bunch, because the quality has fallen scary to take in a bunch. but, nevertheless, after all, this technological superiority was actually created by the previous generations. here is a generation deteriorating as politicians. this spenders. these are the people who spend the capital accumulated by previous generations of europeans, under the european inhabitants, the industrial revolution. here is the backlog of this whole base that has been completed. it was done under other political systems. it was done under other social realities, when there was no this pseudo-democratic model created after the second world war, when it happened and degradation began, if you look at these great politicians, whom we all the time refer to. and where did they church, a where is the denauer, and where is the degul, most of them were born in general in the 19th century, the first prime minister of

great britain, born in the 20th century, in my opinion, hum. yes, if not memory serves, but churchill why can't johnson be? churchill, because churchill belongs to the generation of the creators of that british empire, that british shortest answer around. he can not be without a talented person. no, he has it, but it’s just that he’s everywhere. it can’t be drawn, and therefore it can’t, that it belongs to to a completely different generation, churchill , before becoming fat and terrible, was ground handsome and served and served in the army. yes, first of all, they didn’t shoot, so that’s the point. this is a different biography. johnson, in principle, already in these realities of such a biography as churchill's, and we copy this model out of flattery and duplicate it. well , it would be fine if we presented in universities the great thinkers thomas gops john locke some small analysts, uh,

we present the seventies-eighties-nineties, like candles and their uh, we present an invention in the field of political analysis as absolutely right, and on this we educate ours. in fact, how else will she get professors, who do you have there not to be confused with sweets, hershey, hershey, i tell her i will not be with sweets in different ways. you know, we know the ways, but you have to quote all this fukuyamovism, otherwise it’s like this. but what a shmop you can’t count anything. and what will be the result if we already spoke to chekhov at the beginning, it will be like petya trofima says they left everything for 200 years all around the vulgarity of asiatic, dirt, there is nothing, they already answer him and say, and i don’t like this cherry orchard so much anymore. read russia, that's what we can get. we must decolonize our education. we must finally start this process, and not just talk, but i see that you like the ukrainian poet. do you remember what yanukovych described? chekhov

said that this famous ukraine is here to make these comparisons. ah, when i answer you. sorry here we are in fact, if we're talking about decalonization, we are in position. in which once shocked the mumba said to the king hangover. well, if he spit it himself, we are no longer your monkeys. here we must stop being monkeys of the west, returned to the family. this is your answer why? yes? well, by the way , the liberal democrats dissolved it in acid to the issue. now that was liberal democracy. this is quite a sixtieth year. and we present it as the sovereignty of peoples respecting human rights. and by the way, those who dissolved, they explained, he offended our king ah-yay-yay-yay, and it's me every time i look at a performance, blinkin, he's got it all. such a boringly offended face, and he says some set of unbearable

platitudes about something about his own, i want to say, but already a man. well, at least learn the history of the united states in the same way here, yes, that is, some people who carry, what is unbearably terrible skillfully dissolved the tooth, now blinkin is left, who is not petty about this attitude tells us something about the high principle in america which we start. yes, there are fingers to bend all the time something what happened, moralists are building themselves, but in any case, even then, now that i’m finishing it, i’ll say that vladimir vladimirovich correctly said that they hadn’t started yet, but already in some areas, we must not just start. and as aleksey alexandrovich emphasized , it accelerates sharply. the pace, after all, starts not only with the economy, not with the finances of education, the humanitarian sphere, but social science. what kind of education? what are you talking about? in the sense of being very kind, we let everyone in already. churches are coming to those who already poured shit on the special operation. are you straight

we love them so much. come back. i hope they will return galkin now. all programs on television about the bi-2 concert. yes, but but bi-2 well, listen, well, bi-2 are just guys, but by the way, i can't imagine how you can go out regardless of your political position to go out in st. petersburg in st. petersburg. at the zenit arena, where the fans of zenit are standing, spartak's scarves are already it did n't care about their political position. i expected no options, but yes the other side. and why were they invited at all, you know that one of them is there an ardent fan of spartak, that is, that's why it was done and knowing their political position, in order to show us all that no, if we pass it on, putin says, yes, the guys there are fighting all the cases. and here in the country, what is happening here, they say, but we don’t care at the same time, the same football league there, which said that we cannot afford the crimean teams, is telling us this. turn it on yes, this is the way wow,

that is, the crimean teams cannot turn it on. donetsk, probably, also cannot, and lugansk cannot . okay they said when they played europe now. but we cannot say that we understood. he has absolutely nothing to do with beauty. well then, just so that we don’t have questions then, if your steps are understandable, that is, there are no questions for us explain that we naively don’t think about you that you have something to do with russia but although, when you look who scores? you think that these are ours and these are ours, when you read a surname that you can at least immediately pronounce, you already rejoice. well no. it's good to let all the best from all over the world play, but this is no reason to not care about national interest in russia in matters. well, we don’t, well, there is such a tradition about kindness already about the czech. today they started talking, as they said earlier there is no silver coin a silver coin. so here's a gold one for you. yes, yes, yes, we will forgive everything, we will

all, yes, all forgiveness will bring us once to a cellunder. the presidents spoke about the fall of this existing world order. i would like to stop just on this issue, because it seems obvious that the world order for the last 30 years was built at the expense of russia, was built on humiliation our country and on the fact that, that is, the meaning of this world order is that russia somehow should not have anyone else in world politics, because institutionally and legally. uh, nothing new has been created since the fall of the soviet union , the same norms of international law have remained, the same international organizations have remained for the most part. well, just uh, there is no longer that bloc that was headed by the soviet union before. and now russia would have a completely different role for russia. it's the third fourth the fifth country is the blocs of these liberal states, which are simply moving in the wake of the united

states of america and it is obvious that, strangely enough, we either had to cease to exist at all, or we must destroy this world order, because we cannot exist in this format, and therefore, it seems to me , it is very symbolic that such statements were made simultaneously from biden and from our president, who demonstrates that the united states is still in that old world order, and our president is already talking about what awaits us in the future. i'll just give examples. it honestly seems to me quite funny even just to read such a rubric without comments. here, let's say. biden before visiting a country in the middle east, he says, uh, iran will be isolated until it returns to those agreements that my predecessor abandoned. here is such a phrase. let's say. the first sign of schizophrenia. we withdraw from the agreement. but if you do not return to them, you will be isolated, the second sign. he says i will make sure that the middle east will finally be united, and he will be in harmony.

excuse a. and who divided the middle east who turned it into a territory of chaos of bloodshed civil war refugees the violence of terrorist states. whoever did this themselves, the inhabitants of the middle east it seems to me that they will completely disagree with you on this and against the background. these statements sound in parallel with a statement from our president. for myself, i have noted the three most important ones that i think need to be discussed. the first is what the president said about that in fact today we are fighting against totalitarian liberalism. it seems to me a unique phrase, and it should come into use, because according to the theory of games that was imposed on us, liberals, liberalism and totalitarianism - this is not something that is opposite concepts, but there are liberalisms so that there is no totalitarianism , but if we delve into this term, and what the president said, well, he will understand that today we are

actually dealing with this toreza, if the term totalitarianism itself was developed in at the beginning of the 20th century, well, first of all, in order to designate the regime, everything that was invested in it during this time was thought, what is this regime? this is such an organization of power that seeks to penetrate into all spheres of society and a person who seeks them in every possible way. you see what liberalism does. here is reducible. i can't help but agree. you are an education, where the threads are not in the social sciences. i'm not talking about naturally, the situation is different there, but no matter where the fabric is. social sciences is either translations books, there are our western colleagues, or these are already our own improvisations, but for the same motives, but given initial parameters that you cannot change. you have to start from someone who suggested an alternative to this division of democracy, authoritarianism, totalitarianism, not every child begins his studies in any of the areas of training in social skills from

this. if you try. it will somehow tell you what a crazy person is. who is this at all, where did you get him from in this whole world is already there agreed 100 times that this is so, and all the culture climb, here it comes, the fourth month, five operations. what changes have we made in the field of education? honestly, let's say we said, we got out of the balloon system. a month after we were told, good evening. all the best. we said, we are creating a russian monitoring system, publishing activity. we didn't create it. this is the western system again. uh, and here that the president should sit down there to gather experts to look for. let's throw ideas, i now i will create a system for you. no, it already was. come on, an indication of why we are not taking the steps that are required of us in these conditions. so in every field. we must understand that this totalitarian liberalism. we sit deep enough and have no illusions. of course, it shouldn't be here, the second thing the president said and i think this is also extremely important. he uttered

the phrase like that. he said, for the time being, different states are called there with this elite of the united states of america. he said, still from this elite. i am i think this is very important, because you showed footage of farmers on strike. you showed footage of protests in various european cities, they will become much more, because that's how van bank is. come on, these political parties, their leaders did not leave themselves so much room for maneuvers in the first days of the start of the special operation, so now, as soon as there is an order, as if they were counting on the fact that if we put all our efforts now, there will be no non-state power in russia, nor russia as such, there will be no more further. we can simply use these resources to solve all our problems there, that there was not even a calculation. and if it doesn't work, we'll get an answer. it’s not even that russia is retaliating sanctions in ours , but we will begin to suffer from our own sanctions, that we will be the same as we will be our population before the next elections. did not

live, no one calculated. not me. i think that there is no level of unprofessionalism, that no one even considered what would happen. i think that their whole calculation and their whole miscalculation was that they consider our society, under the same mold, under the same criteria by which they consider their own society, and i assure you, if we did, if we were the usa and would take the same steps in relation to any average european country. she would capitulate on the third day. now, if we told you that these brands are leaving there. everyone will no longer have this fast food. you will not be able to fly and buy some goods online for yourself there . it would just overthrow the government, he does not care, that there will be neighbors with their close people, something else, it seems to me, they proceeded approximately because of this understanding that moscow is within the framework of the garden ring. it simply cannot withstand such oppression as the inability to buy cheap clothes and go to the usual fast foods. but this was

a very important calculation.

and in fact, today in europe we are faced with the fact that the traditional party systems that took shape somewhere after the second world war, somewhere after the nineties. they will soon, it seems to me, cease to act at all, because both flanks of this party system fought over who would be even more critical of russia , the conclusion showed these, uh, psychopaths, who stand for the right to kill children. and there was one of them with bracelets. i’ve been saying for some time that back, that, unfortunately, the

ukrainian people and ukraine, e, were turned into another letter in the lgbt abbreviation, and here’s what to add next, you can see it in any public, any groups that popularize an unconventional attitude, they a now two checkboxes and ukrainian it is becoming a symbol of homosexuality is becoming a symbol of the struggle for the rights of some kind of ukrainian petition for permission, gay marriage, has gained the necessary plus 25.000 and will now consider what to see how zelensky can ban. here but it must be very european. well, so now i'm waiting for him to allow gay marriage in orthodox ukraine and, uh, in line with this, since these two flanks fought each other. uh, for which of them is more about ukrainians, who will criticize more russia will soon have elections there during the year in italy there farther than other countries and will have to answer questions from the population. what about you? how did you

calculate, in general, how would you consider your steps , how it affected us and such leaders will begin to appear, which we now either do not see in the political arena, or they previously gained two three four percent and most of them will be set up either to withdraw from the membership. european union either loosen it or the maximum possible amount acquire sovereignty for themselves. while i was talking, i remembered you had such a film, a dash of an interview with the president of the world order, 2018, where the president just said that he personally considers it most important in relations with other states to try to understand their interests and make sure that these interests are theirs not violated by observing their own in the first place, but here the question is , how can one even try to guess the interests of european countries, if their leaders are not something that they should not. they don't even articulate them. they are about they are not spoken at all. they are waiting for what will be said by the main such demiurge of western politics. and after

that, they begin to fight with each other for who can best meet these expectations of the american administration, and therefore those countries that during this time will find an opportunity for themselves to create political regimes to create power that will at least guide you. we do not speak for our interests. comment on your own interests. it will be much easier for us to line up with you relationship with these countries. we will communicate, we will build, well, those countries that are simply there, i don’t know the level of local government for the american administration, and they just carry out budgeting and distribution of financial resources there, well, no more than that, they don’t make political decisions. well , apparently, they will not have their place in this new world order, and the final thing i want to draw attention to. this is what the president said, that the world order should ensure the future sovereignty of peoples and civilizations. this, in general, i think, is the most important statement of the president, because the sovereignty of the state. we know what

it is. what is the sovereignty of peoples. we also know that under the sovereignty of civilization, civilization is primarily a cultural community, that is, there must be a world order in which the cultures of various peoples of various communities of people and civilization must be protected. they are bigger and they are higher than nations, because there are several. the people are, as a rule, in one civilization, usually united religious culture and this factor will become a priority in the future world order and the fact that our country will defend just such an approach. i'm sure that's what it will bring. we have very great support in various parts of the world. our position finds much more understanding than this jacobin desire to destroy any culture of religion and other things that is being spread by our western opponents. i looked at why the americans want to impose restrictions on the purchase price of oil from russia and realized that they are they just go the way that they went in their time, germany but if you leave aside all sorts of

ekioki there, it is clear that germany's economic miracle was built on more than available russian gas, of course, so the first one who suffered the most from all that is happening is germany because germany is completely destroyed as an influential competitive economy, because if the price of gas is like a sport they have zero chance of being competitive to the industry. and now, when absolutely, honestly americans, they say the same about oil. then it becomes a means that, in fact, everything revolves around this. a layer of politics that says, how much do hydrocarbons cost, why did they always need russia? why is there always a struggle for russia? is everything clear? affordable, if you say cheap energy source, and if we start that's what we talked about, this is what dmitry drobnitsky talks about all the time ruble pricing for our hydrocarbons, then this fundamentally changes

the whole picture of the modern world. it could be very hard answer. it's just that it's just so straight tough , tough and painful, and all this chatter about liberal democracy, but it does not stand up to scrutiny. that is, well, just for this purpose, it is not by chance that westerners have completely closed themselves off from russian informational influence. it's not by chance. they carried the term propagandists, propaganda channels, and false narratives. they say china, why do you listen to repeat the kremlin propaganda and because we are telling the truth. we talk about and say america will fight against those who persecute dissidents outside their borders. well, yes, tell me. well, of course, by the way, if biden is not afraid, johnson is not afraid. is there ber god or what? i'm ready to interview them. uh-huh and it will be shown in russia tell the people of russia what i see fit, but also

answer our questions. we know what you can say, and you are ready to honestly answer our questions, because they say that you had such an aviary that you were ready to give up in your life for the right to express a point of view with which he did not even i agree, but this is clearly not right. in general, non- voltorians. yes, you know, i continue the theme under my franchise listed there danaur de gaulle. yes, i immediately remembered right now during this whole presentation of a new book, kinjar, leadership, yes, where, in particular, he wrote these six leaders, and about them, too, yes, and now i got caught thinking. i want to buy here. this is such a life of the great caesars in a new way, whom he knew personally. how do you understand? he almost knew what it was for, what, i think, you have to buy, and then you don’t think can. they themselves have cut us off, including from their information field, and are thinking of somehow influencing our we there, our voltarians, and

so on. at the same time, they themselves erected this iron wall, including the informational one, cutting them off from ours from our media and us from their own daring books , their literature, and so on. well, it's amazing what they want to achieve while not really knowing. i also wanted to pay attention to this wonderful article by biden. washington post. well , really. when i read this phrase that iran should be punished for refusing a deal that my predecessor broke, look, well, it's a formula. here are those who we are constantly amazed at, where did this phrase come from. a world based on rules. so here it is. it, that is, it does not matter the law treaties international agreements, it seems that the united states is one country. yes, well, here, i didn’t break it, i did it. this is my predecessor. it does not matter that this is also the president of the united states of america, but iran must be punished . america has never been a democracy. yes, therefore

iran here, well, and so here is the approach to international law, which has already ceased to be law, but has turned into the rules that the president of the united states now dictates, acting in this, depending on who comes to the chair in the oval office . that's all. here it is the explanation of what we have not asked now about liberal totalitarianism. you know, the clearest example is the ones mentioned here, the netherlands, yes. that is, the most liberal country in the world is always said, yes, while here japan is stunned by the assassination of a former prime minister politician. no one has been killed in years. and i, uh, i remember the netherlands in 2002, they kill the leader of the party, then the questions that came to the leadership positions, when pima fortein normal, they kill everything else, but he’s not a liberal right, he already leads a completely different anti-liberal movement and somehow society took it like that, like in 2

years theo wang is literally skinned on the streets of amsterdam, who is also. as a matter of fact, uh, he conducted his broadcasts, wrote, spoke to the idea of ​​​​views, who have been objectionable to the liberal community since then, their banner was picked up by the leader, also quite popular in the netherlands, the gertwilders party for freedom. and then there's liberal democracy. yes, it seems to be the most liberal country in the world, the prime minister goes without protection. i never met him on the streets. but the demolition of the ryut, yes, without security, he rides the bike calmly, the wilders are always forced to walk with a bunch of security guards, armed in bulletproof vests , they get to the point that they have parliamentary tv battalions and there are ryukts, there are ministers, anyone. everybody shirts are ok. wilders always has to wear a bulletproof vest on televised debates, standing next to the prime minister of the netherlands, and this is the

very liberal totalitarian country he was mentioned, how the police were now shooting from a sixteen-year-old tractor driver, yes, who was just leaving the protest. they demanded to stop pulnuli. he was there a few centimeters saved this sixteen year old boy. so he was also arrested on charges of, uh, attempt on the lives of police officers, although throughout the video it is clear that he was driving in the other direction without anyone ran into, agreed before. it was fargo four to eat. yes? uh-huh. i mean, i injured her fist with my eyes. well, yes, that’s about the same way he was arrested, where farmers are now storming police stations, and to the fact that you said that russia was not included there, putin was immediately accused of russia from the very first days that they set fire to it, everything is just there those farmer protests. firstly. the day of these massive protests, one of the leaders of these protests of farmers announced that he had called for the creation boer people's republic and we all remember. yes, the

boers in dutch - it means farmers. well, here, respectively, the farmer's republic. immediately, there is an analogy with ukraine and russia. and since they were supported by the leader of the current, also such an alternative right-wing party, a forum for democracy dash, but there right away, and he is considered putin’s agent because he always condemns the west and nato for aggression for the war in ukraine, and so on and so forth, everything here is putin's agent, in fact , inciting these very protests. and take that same sri lanka, right? that is, the same sri lanka, but hmm, there, too, you read the icon's magazine there, when they predicted hunger riots around the world. now they immediately cited sri lanka as an example, see because of the blocking of russia's grain and food supplies. e. in sri lanka, it means that butas are ripening and, accordingly, they are overthrowing the government of i thach, that in fact the rejection of the

chemical by the government of sri lanka is to blame. these are all kinds of chemical agro-fertilizers. oh well, as if putin forced them refuse. as a result, the failure of the tea harvest, not the harvest there, but the main export products and so on . what does putin have to do with the fact that putin stopped supplying tea to sri lanka? but what is krasnodar or what ? what well you concept and like this and calmly. this is how britain is blamed for everything, again, the one we mentioned is fighting johnson, who are we too, right? and? see both parts here. this is when he was already removed. now us hearings began to recall a meeting with a former agent kgb well, there, then, uh, with the former owner of the npenda newspaper and so on, and his son. excuse me baron now the siberian world. yes, well, and accordingly, that means that he is putin's agent, removing him, so the british public was told to us. today, the ndbanton newspaper comes out that see putin

rejoices at johnson's resignation in russia this is a holiday. that is, in the end, it turns out that we shackled him agent putin, uh. and why do you think today the day off has passed and already on the weekend today we rejoice, what? but now we rejoice, that's all must. i don't get it, it's a day off. if yes, and in this sense, well, yes, they specifically took fisherman's day to show up today, because johnson is going to fish, but what do i mean, in the end, and when it is revealed now that you decide sunak chancellor under boris johnson who actually provoked current resignation? yes. uh, after stepping down a few days ago, he uh registered a domain for his uh campaign in december. e last year , exactly in those days when the scandal with the party began, remember on the terrace on the down, string 10 downing street, yeah, and what's the most interesting?

that is, it is being clarified now, everyone remembered that, after all, the photo on this terrace. uh, judging by the location , it was made from a personal office. decide sunako, ah-ah stand. and what about the path? where is he registered here in the domain zone completely, that is, you understand, well, anyway, in any case, russia is to blame, as it is blinken now. here he answers questions. yes, russia blocks, and with that very look, as if something had happened to his stomach there, and all the time he says, here is russia means the grain is blocking. that 's a whole press conference was devoted to. here it would seem, yes, where is somewhere the vaunted british once vaunted british journalism. well, someone would ask a question one fact. just name what kind of ship russia intercepted, detained , stopped or threatened to blow up if it leaves the ukrainian one. grain port yes, well, here’s one small one, nothing is enough it’s clear, and no one asks about it, because there is simply a common narrative russia is to blame for everything, but,

accordingly, everyone who will question this narrative. how do you remember the unfortunate one, how do you like matthew? yes, yes, yes, he dared to ask uncomfortable questions, how everyone immediately began to bully him there. here, god forbid, you immediately agent of putin and the kremlin now he brings to advertising, and after him in the studio sunday evening. it was the director of the information department of the ministry of foreign affairs that saddened vladimir on zakharov . the western press raced, it worked on the

news about the isolation of russia, in fact, an attempt to boycott us at the g20 ministerial meeting failed even before the start of the form. now, of course, it would be more interesting to know the opinion of the head of the german foreign ministry. berburg, and the so -called rape drug is now being negotiated by lavrov. and if you don’t know this story, then it turned out that during a meeting of a large party, some ladies were drugged with this very drug or, er, drugged, during which some hours. yes, we did not know what was happening today, but the german press. it's not that interesting. but she really berburg said that lavrov was leaving, because he could not speak somewhere inside, that is, well, the person is delusional. in any if we have a lot of real problems that need to be solved, for example, kaliningrad transit response to new sanctions sunday evening studio director of the press information department of the

russian foreign ministry moril vladimirovna zakharova maria vladimir you didn’t want us very balda but not a simple flight straight from the ship to the ball hard work, just objectively, because it is very difficult we have not seen this something bulgakov for a long time. it seems to me that i want to say, the most important thing and to place special emphasis on this, the indonesian side has done, maximum for to ensure that the most important event in terms of these crises, which are now developing with the input of the west, take place at the highest level, based on the incredible difficulties that the westerners have repaired and continue to repair. western regime. here is the most seven. so that, well, in particular, the russian delegation simply technically

arrived there. after all, you understand that uh is extremely close and fly for many hours, not 5 not 10, but about fifteen hours there, and with uh the need to refuel and so on, even for this track is our so-called, as we used to say, western partners, and today we call them the western regime of the liberal dictatorship. let's get straight, well, let's start talking, the liberal dictatorship did everything to ensure that even on the issue of refueling the aircraft of the russian delegation, they create maximum obstacles. so, i would like to say that the indonesian side did everything that was necessary to ensure that this event took place, that it was held at the highest level, so that there really was an opportunity for twenty to concentrate. wow, probably today the main problems are the crisis of multilateralism and

the crisis of one way or another of the food energy agenda, so we clean them praise honor praise the official representative of the state active politician of this country, who really understanding the development of events did everything necessary to ensure that, despite the pressure of pressure, there was a colossal sides of the west and the first turn of the united states, nothing was disrupted. this is where i would like to start, and then let's start describing the volant ball, because i would not call it differently in terms of what the western regimes did there in the information and political sphere. as you remember, they started whipping up this informational hysteria long before the smith twenty, they said that it was necessary first to keep russia from growing apart , then they saw that it would not be possible

to physically keep it out. this is not silent europe for you, which takes on a visor for every click of its master. there from the ocean. this, by the way, independent asia are the very strange ones who have gone through the colonial past, which is directly connected with western regimes and know that there is no justice in unilateral us sanctions no, this is a desire to dominate and asia has shown true independence and solidarity with truth and justice for the benefit of the development of international relations, when they understood the western regimes that it was not working, and first of all, the united states of america technically did not let the delegation in, then they did not proceed with plan b. this is the plan b was to quote with your behavior, how did you see about it? many spoke

with reference to leaks and even experts close to the white house, then to some other downing street, and so on. they planned, either a massive exit from the hall or some other, well, i don’t know, to hold the so-called political torchlight processions there, and then i have such a feeling that someone hinted to them that it would be nice to remember, elementary arithmetic rules. just take 20 subtract seven from there and get 13. and when they suddenly realized that they were in the minority, because none of the other countries of the twenty supported the seven and everyone was focused on a specific result, the standard discussion of the pressing problems of the world of order, that's when they realized that if they boycott during the speeches of the meetings, then they will be in the

minority, but no longer behind closed doors, but the whole world will see the collapse of their idea of ​​dominance. then they set about the plan. i would say c, but i’ll say g. because then they took up their favorite for our information engine for our so -called free media mainstream, free of course, we take it in double quotes. they began to manage the journalists who brought them there and who were invited there in order to create an external feeling that something is going wrong, that there is some kind of boycott of russia. you won’t believe for 2 days i watched western journalists from different parts of the world in germany australia and so on literally ran around this space like a stopwatch and asked only one question. where lavrov where did he go? how much time did he spend in

the hall? and why did he leave the hall when he flies away, and when he arrived, she was no longer needed, and whether he would be diabetic for both of them was not interested in anything. i mean these western ones. the streams of journalists are not about energy or food security, or politics, or the future of the world, or the issue of migration, or anything they had an order for. they tried to work it out, but that didn't happen either.

summer will not be boring movies series documentaries cartoons no, nothing is impossible.

manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it's best to check.

the plan turned out to be real g. and then and then they gave up on it , and then, probably, for the first time in many years. i saw how these very representatives of western regimes were forced to personally participate.