how did the nazification of ukraine go? why did the poisonous flower of nazism bloom in this country after 80 years ? why this happened is a different level of education rewrote the history of world war ii etched out the russian language, i don't want to speak ukrainian. why are you forcing me? i studied at a russian school in mariupol why do they send me to a russian school? they say that you taught everything badly in ukrainian. the cultural basis of nazification is the total adaptation of the population, we do not know how the identification of ukraine will take place, but the fact that it is necessary is beyond

any doubt. and they are just hysterical. we have russian passports. we are not. we, your bourgeois , say, no, it doesn’t fit, but i’m still a historical optimist and i think that with all the costs we have, we will achieve victory in a special military operation, primarily in the danazification of the former ukrainian ussr, but this does not remove, and i will try here insist on your point of view. this does not remove the task already now, it means to start telling the outside world that

will be after our victory remember this movie was at 6:00 pm. after the war. it was filmed, when nothing had been decided yet, but i have not met. do you know how the world will be? well, it’s real, if you say, i don’t know, we know the trend here. yes, nothing, we don’t know here, i see, well, you’re from the country now it’s like we have a special operation, it’s like we have some people coming here, that you are carrying them, no one is watching at all, some kind of all-partisanship has already begun, that is , it feels like you do something with fleas flirting, right, how do you come up with? yeah , stop it. what are you, that is, people in general, really, or something, do not understand anything people do not understand at all what is happening in their loved ones, because their fleas and this is the whole problem, but a declaration of how we see the future world. it is a declaration

that these fleas are no longer their own to hear what mozart said. yes, you know, here show us the max, if i understand correctly, it's not just max it was a citizen deputy hmm let's look at the deputy. i just deputies. from below, they fired a mule such that there was aggression, something such that there was an agritian state, this state, and another war was blamed. on the border of ukraine for 24 years, they seemed to be, right up to voronezh somewhere in 1924, the lesson is whether putin is leading it with someone else. it must be destroyed by itself, that the system of magic seems to know, it is

itself a benefit. the victory of the whole we only think of this, but we need a military victory in the first place. i recognize something badly after plastic surgery, this is the same maksakova. well, what's the problem, then there is this same maksakova who loved putin until she lost consciousness, who was a deputy from united russia, was married to voronkov, who was a deputy of the communist party of the russian federation where everyone thought this, who then regularly repented, help, this is it, this is it. this illiterate, worthless creatures kindred open. and you can recognize all those who protected her all these years, now they are calm and asked and fed them with money. it 's something. this is mediocrity, no one wants to answer for these projects. why are these questions yes, have to be asked. and where? and where to

get dressed from these questions? the main thing is that these questions are better in kiev in kiev killed her husband. i'm in very similar oral murky circumstances, but that's not important. that's what it means, you see, well done, here are the traitors and how many of them how many of them in ukraine, by the way, i wonder a. and she has property here. she lost in court and suffered and immediately felt that russia should be defeated immediately. oh my god, the attraction came right away. yes , amazing creatures, and where they live can be directly documentary film shoot advertising. i invite you, dear friends, to our new edition of the besogon tv author's program, which will be called somewhat frivolously. are you a hunter or i hope

you understand? why is it called that? looking forward to seeing you? well, a few words about the values ​​there. yes, it is important. here we are discussing all sorts of different gender things with laughter. i understand that this causes wry smiles. in general, the conversation is like this. what do you say, or what? nothing more or something, like, in fact, this a very serious thing, which, it seems to me, western civilization has grasped well, so to speak, in this sense. that's because, uh, you know, i don't want to act as a doctor here, but, nevertheless. each of us knows that sexuality plays a very important role in life. and what did western civilization do. she legitimated any sin climbed into everyone's soul, and most of her such, so to speak, you know, hidden and dark corners, and in fact, so to speak, dismembered. here, if you will be with us, here we are in our culture everything is allowed. no, nothing forbidden at all, whatever

you think of. it can be any muck, not muck at all. if that's what you want, actually, it's the strongest thing, the strongest thing, that they work very well with young people, especially in their so-and-so this period, what is called growth? yes, puberty and so on. of course, this is not quite my topic, but as if it were a reality, they work very seriously. and with other, so to speak, groups of the population, who also, as it were, may have some. uh, this is the most dump head on the subject. they have always raised this topic very seriously in relation to any opposition, because the revolutionaries are positionalists and others and so on, they are all turned on the freedom of sex, everything, because for many of them, if you dig around like that and ask, for example, say, there are a couple of dozen such pinpoint questions. you will eventually come to the simple things the simple things freedom through the destruction of tradition tradition many of them actually see things through . accepts as absolute freedom of sexual

intercourse, so that everyone fucks everyone and everything that moves them, there was nothing for it. i bring this case specifically to such a rude, as if so rude i agree, because it really depends on age. it's clearly younger. it's the one that moves older. it is that those who are no longer moving can no longer catch up with these age move. they provide for their joys. i'm not talking about the fact that the next question of the joke fell well in that who how much can pay for it. that is, this hedonism is consumerism, brought to the level of absolute disgusting and is in fact one of the main value ideals of western civilization. and they understand what they are doing. they understand how with this thing you can get into the soul of anyone. they understand how something can be pulled out of anyone's life in order to say later. but look, there was this and that and the fifth or tenth, they understand all this very well. why because their own elite really long mired in debauchery? as in the

way of life and under this, many ideologies are largely tucked in with this they go hence all these, so to speak, 333 genders, as if from here all this boundless freedom, and they primarily operate on young people. and this is given to him, by the way, because many young people, as it were, simply do not have enough experience, knowledge, or understanding of themselves to realize what they actually operate on, so they speak small age, you don’t have to choose anything, not only good and bad, not only good and evil, floating categories, even you yourself or yourself even your gender, as it were, yes. this floating category. complete freedom, absolute flexibility is another thing that is also. well, roughly speaking, i lived here, so to speak. it seems to me that i should understand this, in fact, a person immersed in an endless analysis of himself in terms of sex, sex and other things gradually becomes incapable of anything else crazy. he can't do anything anymore . he is not really capable of any

kind of creative creation, he is not capable of learning. he becomes incapable of digesting a large amount of information, knowledge he does not it is interesting to work and all that, and this in turn is supported by the drug culture . the drug culture immerses you in a situation that you generally swim into a completely different state. illusory life. in general, everything is perfect for you, when the light bulbs are on, as if the following are all sorts of different categories. well , for example, let's say, by the way, one of the things that is pushed by a well-known, so to speak, behind-the-scenes figure. it's like, yeah. uh, moreover, at the same time, to immerse a young man state of the eternal student. put him on perpetual welfare. and let him do nothing at all. and we are for him paris uh, we will decide from it. let him sit on the steppes until the age of seventy, crawling from one indistinct state, so to speak, to another indistinct state. so to speak, changing some things, he presents himself with this and that. with this and here

we see these, so to speak, stoned multi-colored old men covered from their feet with tattoos who do not understand. they lived up to 60-70 years. they don't understand what's wrong with them. going looking for looking for. yes, so to speak. what are you doing? looking for really looking. that's the main thing, in my opinion, or one of the main values, in fact , that's western culture, they understand where they climb. in this sense, they very skillfully calculated psychology, and they play these things like a piano for a religious person. quite obviously. they legitimized every sin of sin, no more . there is your desire. how to implement it through receiving money, therefore, by the way, such, as it were, frenzied vulgar iconocentrism. understandably, that the economy you can not remove from this life, but honestly. if you tell any of you that you are of this stomach, anyone will object. how am i? and i have these fantasies, some dreams, and i love someone or not at all. you are your intestines and nothing else. it is impossible to live without an intestine. it is obvious. the stomach, too, but you are

not the intestines, or at least not only the intestines, but from here, as it were, yes, this endless endless obsession with the vulgar understanding of the economy as an absolute meaning. you should earn money to have fun. you have to take money from somewhere to get this pleasure, which may be considered forbidden by some, and we allow you to get out of here, by the way, such a struggle is also moving further into the political plane, the struggle of democracy against autocracy and autocracy. whether you like it or not , for various reasons, for one reason, for other reasons, but they adhere a little, so to speak, to the traditional view of life, although it is clear that they vibrate, as if they too so to speak, in places they are floating, crumbling, all this is hidden behind the scenes, but nevertheless the most interesting topic or something. do you know at least one autocracy, as they call us? where would soft drugs be allowed? well, not that they are allowed, er, so to speak, yes, but they took place as part of the culture here. but i don’t know

why the chinese are banned in russia, but as a practice , there are no banned, but in a democracy. yes, they are not just allowed to introduce you, so to speak, catholic excitement. as they say as they say, yes so, here they go through medical management of a person in a political. why is it so important to destroy the traditional society, because it moves huge masses of people into a state of apolitical in a state that is called freedom in which they are generally not able to create themselves not as a sovereign unit in this life, not as sovereign communities, as a sovereign state and so on hence all these things. i do not absolutize these moments, because, of course, we have any, as it were, really much more diverse multifactorial multifaceted there, and that also plays and in different historical periods. they are different in different cultures. it happens in different ways, but what kind of this topic is being promoted as a central one. it's not an accident at all, it's never an accident well, there, again, i don't want to

leave the religious ones for some kind of these categories, so to speak. well , of course, this orthodoxy is infernal to us, this is called a satanic theme, because turning plus to minus is what it is. as a matter of fact, well, as if the main main task, what is it called? this is a settled look doubts a vivid example of ukraine is now in the whole propaganda of homosexuality. including e vsu to the fullest the requirements for allowing cannabis to be free with it, but it’s going to the fullest that now they have collected more than ten thousand gay marriages, the war with orthodoxy and satanic will vote through these things they are hacking, that is, plus mass culture institutions are hacking all traditional cultures, imposing an absolutely unlined and identical mass culture all over the world, passing, including to the political level. that didn't want to all must answer the same one, move the questions are the same or someone else did not want to be shown. just digging so deep. that's right in confirmation of his words, what to show you? here's

how you like these cakes, which are now on sale in kiev . look, they think that this is normal, these are objects. they take photos of our fallen servicemen and sell them on cakes and happily eat it. and what was even clearer was how crazy they were ukrainians. here is the coronazi. check out their recipe. stormy the transcarpathian brigade is preparing a delicious bograch, the recipe for the dish is very simple, for this you need three two types of meat, a muscovite, a buryat and a kadyrovets, we take javelins, that is, we will set up and shoot their t-90 tank. well, then everything is clear. this is mental satanism. here is satan. well, this is also a multiplied hysteria, which is caused by the fact that they do not succeed in what they would like to do, and therefore here, yes, they absolutely cannot

themselves, but keep it within human limits. well, this humanization. this is actually this post. humanism he is. the main thing is that the development of western civilization is actually a trend of such a pillar road. but i think that's where it really is, after all. well, when the end will be, i don't know, to be honest, yes, but it will. that's for sure, but still, for now. it seems to me that this is where they will stumble, among other things, their attempt to reduce the entire world history in the struggle between democracy and autocracies. she's too primitive too. superficial and too annoying to a huge number of people in this world and it is difficult accept because she is so obsessive aggressive. and well, if you have to say that this aggressiveness is so sometimes, so to speak, it is pointless that a huge number of people are a billion people in this world. she still seems repulsive. i think that with this, with this agenda, he, too, went to saudi arabia and correctly american buildings write that how he is going there? yes, in this paradigm - autocracy against democracy to act. this one has this one so to speak. this feed has mass of their abortions discuss salons. it

's interesting forbidden. this submission has a lot of internal problems. there are a lot of internal problems these problems. in any case, so to speak on a joint. to be honest, i think that the sincere fascinated people of western democracy are actually the most left . unfortunately, in the post-soviet space, it's true, and uh, in big social security, yes, and this is a separate conversation. why is this so? but it's real, so the people most of all lying to themselves about the west remained right here here. at russia in the post-soviet states of the former countries of eastern europe well, there may be less, but nonetheless. this is a phenomenon that also needs to be studied. but this one, as it were, is clear that it is separate. subject the very last thing i would like to say, listen, stop well in my personal opinion. stop repeating. here are these spells about the fact that if we do not achieve such and such results in this military operation, we will collapse. and that means it 's about time. no, there are no results. we already we have achieved some, we may still achieve, this is not what we would like, at least i would like to, but no hands. we won't disappear, we won't fall

apart, automatically. no, it won't. actually don't. you know this self-fulfilling prophecy. there is a problem. they need to be solved, some are being solved, some are not being solved, we must be aware of the mistakes that were. although a lot these are not mistakes, but in fact regular results, as far as the same economic policy is concerned. it seems to me that much of what we are discussing here is, unfortunately, not mistake, but quite natural regularity of the results of the philosophy of economic development all these 30 years. in which dependence was included, as one of the fundamental elements that allegedly guarantee development, now we have come to the conclusion that this is a problem, but it’s good that at least we are aware that there are problems, but even if we don’t achieve any results in we will not disappear in the economy or in politics, and there is no need to bury ourselves here with some afterlife songs, no matter how they sing it, they won’t wait and don’t exhibit here some you know the conditions. now, if it will be then it will be, let's let your forecast be the most come true. let's choose this forecast as self-forgetting, what

will not happen. well, the historian, as it turns out, it is much more complicated and, in general , people do not give a damn about any progress, but it is necessary to win there, this does not raise doubts, but a little from afar in april 89. gorbachev flew to cuba as a treacherous entity. uh, the last secretary general of the ussr, uh fedeli caster, i understood a long time ago and therefore the photographer is very clearly fixed. you can find a photo of this relationship on the net, in which gorbachev, with his stupid smile, says something about freedom. you understand his perestroika and fidel castro is looking at him from the side with surprise and contempt. but when i analyze the activities of western leaders and other political pygmies today, i often remember the fire, in general, cubes are a separate, my love. and here, but, but surprise, i don’t have feelings of contempt, disgust and

rage, including noble ones, if we remember lines from lebedev kumach's holy war about the rage that boils up, this is connected with that satanic yes cruelty and joy that not only the ukrahunta, but also the fascist experience. under the bombardment of mirny cities of ukraine while destroying the population of ukraine and its infrastructure, uh, social and cultural facilities. well, at the same time, i understand perfectly well, and we all know what it is, but the traditional practice for these e western countries, because at the end of the second world war, according to the patterns that developed livin and morgenthal were bombed. eh peace. yes yes yes. yes, thank you, as you can see, when he

looks like that. that's what deep eyes fidel seems to have. i could just give a dome now. yes and here you are and he is watching. you think, and now you're just going to rub me now about the peaceful existence of systems. after that, all assistance from the soviet union, in fact, to cuba was stopped and gorbachev , e., surrendered. eh, the whole socialist camp. we know what was the fate of both hongikera and uchiushi and so on, but now this is not the point so, uh, rage of course, associated with the activities of modern liberal hmm democracy, as they call themselves uh, it uh, goes back to the events of the second world war when german cities were bombed and nuclear bombs were dropped, but we know very well that not only by force, but solve their geopolitical tasks. uh, these so-called political werewolves. they also came up with not

violent methods, but which they replicated and were exposed as the main ideologist. yes, jinsharpa political upheavals. actually, there was a whole machine working and the institutional financial that served these coups and when i listened to bolton's speech. why did i remember the adventures of pinocchio remember? there is such a phrase, a toad, in my opinion, a toad, in my opinion, says pinocchio that one leech sucked so much blood that it became too much to talk. here, uh, all these demons are people, otherwise, you probably can’t call them. they have already sucked so much blood and, uh, that they already talk too much, are not shy about anything, write everything , tell everything, and so on. well for the last 50 years more than 200 coups have been committed in the world's four main zones. we know, yes africa south of the sahara. latin america middle east asia and

the post-soviet space until now, the first political upheavals since 2000 have not subsided , more than 40 times a statesman was removed as illegitimate or not quite legitimate. by the way, i'm dealing with this problem. with uh, very tightly since the eleventh year in 2012, a large article of my secret of color revolutions has been published. that would be mikhal gennadievich delyagin would have confirmed in a magazine with free thought and then m-m in the twelfth year. uh, many colleagues played me at whisk and they said that this is all conspiracy theories, that you write about all sorts of american ngos about all sorts of funding from the state department. you still write about the washington regional committee says to me, yes and now there are high-ranking officials. uh, the americans openly talk about it. well, we already knew that. we just got another confirmation. why did they bleed? yes, because each coup

is hundreds of thousands sometimes and millions of lives, because the destruction of the overthrow of milosevic. this is one mild scenario. soft option. but the destruction of libya, an attempt to destroy syria, is a completely different thing. yes, and korenko and that maidan subsequently, which we today, we are grinding, we are experiencing, we are suffering together with the population of ukraine - this is also a consequence of a political upheaval. and why eh? what else can be here feelings of disgust? yes, these are the things that sergei and sanych vladimir vladimirovich cooked with this one, but biofascism, you can’t call it otherwise alteration, uh, the human race, but moreover involved. again, the most complicated machine, starting from scientists who explain it all, a lot of uh articles by touch, graduating from university yes and uh, including including politicians, economists and so on, but there is another feeling that i have.

why i remembered castro and gorbachev, this contempt is not so much for western politicians as for the patriotic soil now i will explain. i am currently reading a very interesting book. stanislav yurievich kunyaev. this is our wonderful poet and publicist in zaga-heads delivered a phrase from ahmaduli's poem was betrayal, the mysterious passion of the book is dedicated to the sixties, but against this background, our modern history develops. and in fact, this book tells us why there is such a craving for betrayal, and on this on this craving for betrayal. e of their homeland, their e, the interests of their e values, and this revolutionary verse is being built, which unfolds like this to pick up these people in order to carry out a new turmoil is possible,

but isn’t it a betrayal, when, for example, we we see today the results of the education system, as a result of which 42% is the last - a large opinion poll of 42% of the country's young population aged 14 to 35 years. they say that the motherland is where they pay well and where it is comfortable to live. isn't it a betrayal when the teachers of the higher school urge students to go out into the courtyard of moscow state university opposite the arena and hold anti-war demonstrations. and don’t those who are now dying on the front line and under the e- boards of the e-nato artillery not betray their attitude. e, there let's say protecting some public procurement, in general, isn't it a betrayal, when officials and people responsible for certain decisions show strange loyalty to people who take a clearly anti-state position. so i

will be interesting in the summer, do you agree?

summer will not be boring movies series documentaries cartoons no, nothing is impossible. manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it's

best to check. our relations have a long happy history in 1926, our country the soviet union was then the first state to recognize this educated amount is now. it is a great pleasure for us to receive you here. increase akimov was able in a short time to achieve the trust of recognition from the arabs. after a few years of his work, especially the village loves soviet russia and there were no better friends. we hope that we are worthy successors. this is the business of that great

generation of our diplomats. the head of state pays great attention to our work, the foundation laid, which, of course, works. ah, kapets, the legislative base is a society of judges, who sees everything and everything. how can, here now i will lead to what is happening in the states now

now got should not get a lot. and this is one, by the way, this feeling of public contempt should go. if yes, uh exists, it's not a handshake feeling next to that person. eh, you can not be, who is a traitor already a lot, then, but not vice versa now feel. they are public money, of course. why don't they still work then? questions to relevant the first departments were closed to the structures no, the girl with you, volodin clearly expressed, please, if the parent’s point of view is not a question of a specific leader, if he fires a person who was there in social networks or opposed this operation or something else, he becomes a court. let's see if the court will restore or not. where will it be restored?

it depends on what he said, otherwise his court can restore. if a person simply condemned, so to speak, did not call for anything and to restore him to the court, he experienced an unsanctioned rally. here is the call holding a sanctioned rally. i'm talking about it , they don't. they do things a little differently. nevermind. we are now talking about a feeling of contempt for these people and disgust at your activities and nothing has changed in name. they are very bad. you know somehow differently. no time. who gets worse? yes, you know, if we do not get better on this site, which is watched all over the world without exaggeration, we will not raise the price of this issue and, most importantly, that it is fuel. here is the material for the turmoil that perhaps it is no coincidence that on june 10 of this year there were hearings in the us congress in which the question of the need to activate the so-called

opposition forces in russia was raised, and on such traitors in particular they will again rely, so this is a very serious thing that needs to be discussed it's time us smersh i beat it. i'm now speaking on the outside of the inside we need a little to be said. yes, so to speak, everything, here, it is clear who we have what we have. yes? briefly here to put things in order and all the same. let's be honest. let's say. this is the relationship between different people. e. the honor of which, regardless of the situation, destroys each other, it must be torn apart by themselves, they will not leave, nowhere. this danger is a great danger. along with separatism, which is, on which the west is counting, and not without reason. i want now from the outside. i'm sorry people people say. forgive me , just to understand the curling iron, here are many who are here under sanctions, many for a long time, like sergei alexandrovich, even before i was fourteen. how did it happen? it turns out,

that a number of our prominent statesmen are not under sanctions, it turns out that, for example, a person who worked all the time for the gazprom midia structure, which was a member of the wild number of public organizations of the soviets, public chambers, some types of not boys, you looked at the diamond hand you are not closed open translation and this is it, when you look and think, are they just theirs or what? well, of course, therefore, until there is a change in the elite. yes, elite is very serious. yes, it will be so soon or late. it will be very painful for uh, the situation is aside. well now about external factors. hence, external facts in context. here's a visit by bai to saudi arabia the whole problem is for us next in the west to be forgotten. yes, unfortunately, the coming decades. they don't remember us. maybe someone from just these and dreams. yes, we are now the road of life to the south for us the

caspian iran is becoming the road of life, we will not go anywhere. yes, and if we want to enter some serious markets, not the chinese market. china is also behaving very peculiarly enough, and in the south asian market with 2 billion people, you need to keep an eye on this. why is it flying to the middle east that it is in saudi arabia the first oil price to be such that it was beneficial to me without the decision of saudi arabia, he cannot make this decision. yes, the second thing he wants is the creation of an anti-iranian coalition. yes , where will she enter saudi arabia with israel, another slave for us, what will it give if there is a destabilized des? to stabilize in this way they will block in the south direction. that's what it happens there, but from here and such gestures i will draw requests in every possible way, but let's compose all sorts of food, and we can’t calmly watch, but it will turn out killing in saudi arabia or it won’t work. yes, we must actively work in this direction. we actively should be early yesterday. we

must activate saudi arabia, we must actively work with iraq. somehow, two months ago, during this meeting, i said that in fact , there are some tendencies towards a rapprochement between saudi arabia and iran and the so-called baghdad meetings in iraq this is also an important country for us. we mentioned it here. now listen to iraq like this. before the first in the persian hall, 80% of all the weapons of the iraqi army were soviet, and most of the officers. e. it means that a significant part of the bureaucracy studied with us. well, we forgot one day. it was we who followed the lead of the united states and in the first lane. i say, yes, and they didn’t supply spare parts to the second one either, they didn’t do anything there, so to speak, and so on and looked, and now we we want, we want to intensify our actions in this regard, we can act as a third party in relations between saudi arabia and iran, now baghdad, paradoxically , is acting. but i think they gave him that power. why are we not doing this? we can do it, something will happen, of

course. of course, you don't. we are doing this . now i'm listening carefully. so the president of the russian federation announced the president of the russian federation in tehran pursued several first siri there mr. erdogan, our president and the president of iran, russia , as i understand it, they will arrange some kind of there. e. well, i don't know there will be a conversation. yes, the conversation, he says, brother, shaking with the situational, what do you think about starting a war in syria arhaha, everything ends with eid al-adha, just yes, there in northern iraq , too, no one finished for the first time. he is already obviously rubbing his hands, the second field army. turkish means, which is responsible for the syrian operational direction and iraqi readiness. now they will convince him. no no this, and erdogaz is interested in cooperation with both iran and russia, the turks

earn a lot in iran. this window is on us too. god forbid that they persuade him and ten this question will be somehow. well, temporarily, at least. uh, so forgotten, we need to step up this work. here saudi arabia flies. yes, and you can remember koshogi. there's a lot more there. well, we have to come to the saudis to say, let's have a chance, sit down at the technical in the area to do. so-and-so, we have to warm up anti-american sentiment in the regions. here we are talking, why do we get the question of the murders, that means the atrocities of the americans, as soon as our troops withdrew from afghanistan the question of what needs to be raised there there, well, we do not do anything. the mass of documents that brought down the atrocities of terrible atrocities, listen, when a small child is killed in order not to cut off the little finger, but to cut it off, because this is a souvenir, it turns out that one fighter means to him, which means he gives the british to another fighter. it's like a trophy souvenir fashionable little fingers collect. yes, there are terrible atrocities, but we

do not raise anywhere. i say so to myself, where there , somewhere else, blocking is not blocked, this is not the point. why not hold some kind of tribunal in moscow, but simply gather representatives of all the middle eastern countries. excuse me on the basis of shos. yes, these are details, so to speak, yes twist. remember not a single muslim leader in saudi arabia to iran or anywhere else. when will all this mass of information go. he will not be able to understand, he with everything there, what kind of power was not there. they don't care looking down down thinks arab or pirate street, yes, and when it's going to heat up, because it's been done. sorry western crusaders towards. the population will be different. iraq well, how many here in this studio you here, excuse me, they said massacres, still not honored, whether a million were killed, or 900,000, that is, over a million looting of the destruction of the most powerful historical foundation. yes , the destruction of the state. yes, on which you told the genocide, christians, right? yes question who

it will raise for us someone will do. we still continue to pretend that none of this happened. and against this background, the mood in the middle east and in saudi arabia and in iran and iraq will change, it will play out in our favor, because it will not see us as the defenders of one big country, in general european, which turns out to be close to them. look , nato is actively supplying weapons to ukraine, yes. why don't we get the right answer right away? well, for example, they supply some of their own himars or something, there and ukraine why didn’t we supply , for example, more long-range systems and a wound to north korea well , right away, that is, automatically, for example, you imagine there, no, we have much more seriously. for example, can you imagine, there are 10 systems for ukraine, we are implementing sanctions, but we don’t care now either sanctions, for example, yes, we are quietly

talking carefully there from the kander, there are either calibers or installed, which means the missiles are the plans of a technician, such as an iskander , calibers, no need, they have there is a fatex 110 something similar. on i said not only that, they are a problem. now they launched a month ago, which means that a space rocket to an orbit of 500 km. yes. so of course we can substitute the equipment asked for 400 at the request. 400, and how they left my s -300, the whole story was even unpleasant to remember. listen, come on, we also behaved very interestingly very strangely. yes, all of a sudden now it ’s just the idea, so that, for example, you need to know, as soon as they transfer pieces of equipment to ukraine, we immediately supply all the enemies of nato that are more powerful weapons. i think it's a question. we raised the level of military-technical strengthening of military-technical cooperation, the exchange of information, and the exchange

of technologies. they also have accumulated something, of course, using the same files. sorry rule. they have a good one there. uh, so now there is a new heavy mayhem of teams-22, but my idea is that you need to understand that they gave here a threat to show themselves excellent actions after all, for example, testing a nuclear weapon on some small island. as bequeathed to us the north sea? as vladimir volfovich jolie bequeathed to us, but i would sit on a weapon more, i would feel the scope. what it is? well a test is needed. well, i don’t know, that means, therefore, we are interested that we deprive you of our trump cards, so that our positions in this region will be strengthened, and oil, the second is the way out. to the outside world. we cannot exist without it. the second afghanistan is the first caravan through banderabas. finally, finally, 22 years have passed since we signed the document on the corridor. well, then the second question is afghanistan

you know, excuse me, the americans are doing everything to destabilize him, do everything as much as possible , and in this regard we must be very tough in our policy towards those countries that border on afghanistan in the north, but we say it’s not enough time to act, you understand, and here is what i recommended from you on the radio today. this is what she does. this is not an image of philosophy does not sleep. it needs to be done, only these people don't do it. what are you not doing? you don't want to work, do you? you have a lot of diplomats released? send him open there this most beautiful mountain view fresh air. everything is fine. let it work. well, think about it, we criticize the west let's take ourselves no, if it is 10 much more aggressive much more actively agree. well, you so agree 100%, and who are you now, let's say, so that later our partners, the turkmens, will close everything, the uzbeks work there, right? let's join them. let's means e reopen the old railroad to

join. i don't see yet. well, bander-abbas sent a deck. thank you, well, not even 22 years have passed. so to speak. you never see, therefore, in this regard , we must act and act very actively. excuse me for being frank. the united states is acting aggressively for them in this region. he is vital to them, he does not understand. these are minerals, so we need communication, so we need to work for it. the question is not to work. why 22 years you could not do it. and why yes, because they sat in the offices and this matter came up very well and that's it. it's great for someone they do, you know as they say. who are you talking to now? well, not in that sense, but to whom do people who actually didn’t see the direction point-blank, for whom there was nothing there, who saw themselves only in miami, relatively speaking, well, listen, well, we’re all right, we understand, these people who well, where it is more interesting for them to go on a business trip to paris to new york or a fairy tale, you say, that’s why they

didn’t do what they think all the time, with whom and where they will sleep absolutely such things. this is how they are connected. that's it. absolutely correct. as you understand? let katya sleep? comrade dean, state your point of view. of course, it is very difficult for me to perform, if i feel this dove, the only thing. because, well, yes, because the problem is that the problem is that the problem is that we, in principle, now, well,

sort of determine the main development of mankind. it is we who are moving in one way or another in the world of integrity, that is, we are moving towards something in the world of integrity. a single world for several decades or centuries, but we will come to this; moreover, there were two development paradigms in the twentieth century. you know what a spy is. you see, yuri the fact is that there were two projects, yes, there were two projects, not the tower of babel. the communist project was so expedient later, so they put forward globalization, and here another project died . we are now we are actually establishing our activities. i don’t think that saving oneself can even unite allies around oneself, that if russia puts forward the idea that we now have to survive to us, someone to

someone came to us from the soviet union since 1942, and the soviet union had an idea, we fought until the forty- second year from the age of 22, when the soviet union began to try in 2002, what was the idea, by the way, the defense of the social socialist fatherland, correctly arranged no the image of the world for no one mocked any defense of the socialist this is a slogan, because the fact is, the fact is that the soviet work the soviet union carried tenth years, of course, was not. and here i am, a small-scale production of the seventy-seventh year. you say what it is. here you will be a communist, communist, distribution was a tough imperial state policy. it was formed by such a thin layer of communism, and it was rigidly carried out. this is the

basis, which means to spread socialism. yes? this was forgotten even better by the war. it started like this and they forgot about it, which means evil people. and so she started these years with her own wings of destruction. this is what i'm talking about. they close right away. here is the main main idea was precisely this construction, by the way, communism without a class of its society and without a state in the end. bottom line, because it's not necessary. to say, but what do you have to do with the brain bones do not want to build a social everywhere in the whole world i have not seen in my life. and why didn’t you want to build communism, comrades, and we did it, and then then go to the system of the order of the sword, as it was called? this excuse me, it was another caste, such a caste give andrey let andrey say our main idea. now it's really traditionalism, a defense against traditional values. and as for

around this idea, they around survival, you can unite someone else, any other states that, in principle, are closer to us in this idea, which they don’t perceive, what sergey alexandrovich spoke about. here they don’t perceive it for religious feelings on the political, therefore such an attitude towards us in the arab world is such an attitude towards us in china in india why hysteria? because they say the russian narrative wins outside of the seven because much more sympathy is more beautiful than for ukraine because it is perceived as america's mongrel but not survival, you understand, it's not the main thing, that if we are now the main thing, for us it's survival, the main thing, we have a chock's victory, it's just clear there is no survival. either you win or not, your measurement is also certain, the measurement is simple and that's it, salivan said three days ago that

russia had already failed its strategic social studies. kiev none of us announced this to us in half, what is considered salel? on what matters is what the russian people think? sullivan has become an authority for us. i'm not saying that it's small, it 's just that the concept of victory is real. our victory when realized. well, it’s not enough that we already from my point of view, when we go to the western border, when the supreme commander-in-chief said through. and what options then your point of view will be dominant for the troops? well, i'm unlikely to be the commander. well, at least all the little ones would love to hear this incarnation. more precisely, where is our feeling victory for nosification, dementalization, the feeling of victory is simple and clear. first. now lnr. released, further given, it is necessary to release

further, to push back so that there is no threat. the destruction of the military infrastructure neutral status of that territory, so that from there we would not be threatened there is no neutral status, but again, it started well. offer to surrender, there can be no neutralization, so let's go dalamanji nothing to go to break than these moreover, volodya, this is what you propose to break to go right, fuck. they we need. sorry for being right. wait. that is, it turns out you need the western borders. and you don't need to go any further. that is, if they fire at you from poland, then it suits you, that is, no one else fires at you, no problems with me at all. yes, what's the problem? now? sorry with lithuania that it turns out that the european commission gave an explanation, according to which they explain to us how we owe this

contribution to our territory from our territory . now what country international law right now the main thing in upholding international law, what lavrov constantly says russia will uphold international law, so we can’t supply weapons to the wound, we can’t supply, and the dpr, maybe china’s weapons, maybe through the lc, maybe enough has collapsed. i agree that it collapsed? well, with us we proceed from our state, my state proceeds from the fact that there is international law and we have it andrey from the head of some leaders do not exist. andrei is just talking about this, here you can refuse it. i something i agree that this international law does not exist at all, you are domestic law well, when they say military operation special military

operation, then the president said, she ve so to say, do not touch our inner life, therefore, when he has not yet begun, we conduct another legal sensation. here is betrayal. we have the concept of gosmeny in our legislation, and there is the concept of betrayal. what is betrayal if a person has a different point of view and says that our economic policy is fundamentally wrong how do you say it? you betray, no, i'm talking about learning the state. and why betray these - what do you understand here? this is why they pass it on to someone , therefore, what i convey when you say that for this economic policy people in the nineties had to be taken out into the street and fed with vouchers. yes, if they do not have the rule of law, then we should have it. this is also a traditional thing. we have to pull this over to ourselves,

by execution, according to the law, right? i don't dispute all the procedures followed, not public executions, they clarified with them in the procedure, the area was selected. i'm talking now about russia right there, you don't need a third thing. you are criticizing the young promising bolton politician, he is only 74 years old. it can generally be balanced against the current background of the current american leadership. maybe run anywhere. here it is komsomolets komsomolets yes, right? well, by the way, he was a komsomol member because he comes out of, uh, under the wings of a gold doter year sixty-four. corner. he was a young guy. that's it, there are make-ups from there and other such prominent american conservatives. came out actually. and i would say that he admitted that

their experience would not suit us, because we had our own experience, our experience was more successful. in my opinion. well , stalin dismissed this experience in the forty-third year. i mean cominter. this, too, was a change in the political political system and gain an earthly comrade. here the question around what then the comintern was created around the idea and proposed to his turn, but also without comment. you are the successful work of the seventies in africa in latin america, well, they worked, they worked, because again there were tools for this work . which we actually say, yes, this is an important important point, so you have an association like this, you don’t have to go out. from which organizations they need to be reformatted for themselves, and uniting around itself, for example. tail, why do you need to go from there to fight on this

site. you see, on the site where the pharmaceutical giants decide. that's it, i'm just wondering how you will fight on this site. can you create within me? yes, well, i 'll take a look. javadxan can already such was for hao is called. yes, we also thought that now we will compete on this site. yeah, well, the next one there is, by the way, large companies that are not connected with the west, for example, indian companies, you have to follow the line. you need completely different create their own institutions. what about the brix there, for example, we have sco brix sco. this is our institution. yes, there in the name of the ears stick out for a minute. and do you think that he not only said there are large indian pharmaceutical companies well, our indian companies are going to negotiate with our organization, it is i and the csto about allies in our organization.

this is the army and navy. no, by the way, by the way, this is a phrase that you know wagner and wagner's music you mean a private military company. i have mean whatever you want. they played more postmodern with you. yes, it's postmodern. by the way, great fellows well, of course, we must set goals and, of course, we must solve them, and we have, as it were, our own red lines, for which we will lose in any way. well, as a last resort, as if in specific things they are. here is the loss of moscow, as it were, a loss. this is how you can do it. then pack everything up, as if explaining to everyone else, as it were, but if you don’t wear these red ones, no one will be there. and besides you. as a matter of fact, fulfill this is our big problem. and so there are indicators there under other areas, what is it? respectively. we only have everything together in saudi arabia, as if shooting skis, that it’s like saudi arabia before that, by the way, remember everything all together after the fourteenth year and when we cut off oil prices and cut them through saudi arabia. then, of course, she

did it all perfectly, there were no problems, moreover, that she played against her own budget. and now suddenly something has changed dramatically, something has changed, and there was a coronavirus. i remind you, and after that i made a drop, it was not just a deal, it took a fierce turn, we went to negotiate with dolma, they offered us specific solutions and pulled out this price, this price was wiped off by specific people. take it off, you should notice. there are a lot of people talking about the new ones, including, but if there weren’t serious representatives of the stack, respectively, there would be nothing , as a matter of fact, and there would be no india it would be china, there would be no one, there would be nothing, all this would not exist. there are people who are engaged in the rest, as it were, not very efficient, and they have specific performance indicators. you have the task in the near future to orient, relatively speaking, there are 3 million barrels there or 25, which is between the energy agency, everyone is going to survive with us. naturally, they will reorient them to east asia. accordingly, how would it be necessary to throw more. here are the specific figures for specific tasks. there is no how would desire to do something there, tackle grounds, respectively. i doubt that they are more in line with the modern one in their view. that's very