the complex is the property of the country, including research and development facilities, centers and institutions that he managed. well, it wasn’t you and i who chose the path that, uh, was actually launched, there since the 90s of the early nineties and uh, today this function is performed either by state-owned companies or corporations and the private and state ministry in this case consolidates just everything, but the regulatory function is all administrative from the point of view of the development of creative norms. uh means solution a of work on interaction with industry associations, but at the same time it has tools within the ministry. for example, if we need to solve the problem of

diesel engine development today, it is necessary for the energy department and for the automotive industry or the shipbuilding industry, and so on, so it’s just in one department how they do it. many other countries. they actually came to this, so the well- forgotten is, uh. today, a new format, as the world has chosen, is the consolidation of all areas in one department. thank you thank you denis valentinovich faction of the communist party of the russian federation nikolai vasilyevich prepare for the ears him. thank you dear denis valentinovich, i asked you this question many times, but today the situation is different - the orientation of the ministry towards foreign enterprises and foreign trade networks has led to the complete sabotage of these foreign masters of the russian economy. today it is necessary to take radical measures towards foreigners, up to the

nationalization of their enterprises and the creation of their own national industry and trade network that would provide for the country. well, at least 80-90%. russian enterprises registered abroad also need to return the russian jurisdiction. is there a task in the plans of the ministry of transformation of foreign enterprises in the creation of their national industry and trade on the basis of real planning. and if there is , how long it will take thank you very sensitive topic, but i will start from how many foreign companies or companies with foreign capital are represented in our country. uh, in the economy of our country. that's about 25,000 and what you, uh, said about those who made

the decision or are making the decision to leave, uh, s our market of such statements on our monitoring is about 150. well, that is, 150 and 25,000 - this is a big difference, but thank you that you, uh, considered the bill in the first reading, which was called during the uh abrupt departure of one or another. the owner to take control and ensure the performance of a particular enterprise and keep the teams loaded, paying wages , paying taxes, and so on, taking into account the fact that this, among other things, is a message for our foreign

partners to think about how and what solutions they will take for themselves. ah. we are not interested. uh, in the nationalization or on the rise of some enterprises, we want comfortable, but mutually beneficial, respectively, working relations. i can give an example of how this happened with avtovaz very much. implemented my colleagues and i agreed that we would transfer the money to the state represented by our profile institute for a ruble. uh, it means that their stake in avtovaz, while retaining the possibility of an option. there, within 6 years, to return with compensation for the costs that the state can bring, which means and invest in development. eh, this will definitely

happen, because today we are betting on avtovaz a lot of such examples somewhere, this state somewhere. somewhere else , other russian property appears for management. we always try to find a balance of interests, as long as there are no cases of slamming the door and leaving, but you correctly said that there is such a bill, therefore we will do it thank you please ldpr koshelev vladimir alekseevich prepare for the future dmitry gennadievich dear denis valentinovich abroad. they effectively help our exporters, but many of them are now in countries that have taken an unfriendly position today to maintain the trade balance, it is obvious

that the flows of our exports and imports will be shifted to other macroeconomics, and in connection with this issue. what changes are planned in the work of russian turkmen missions, taking into account today's realities? what should we close? which ones to open and what in general should change in their work. vladimir thank you for today registered 57 trade missions abroad, which cuts off the interaction, taking into account additional agreements with other states in the company post 72 states. indeed, today we have somewhat, but narrowed down, and the tasks and priorities for western countries for the uk for switzerland in part, but for active

interaction, as it was before, while we are not in the mood to close them today, we are optimizing teams and transferring specialists to other countries . and in those countries where it already exists, reinforcing representation and aiming at concrete results in honor of, uh, the development of foreign markets. that includes, uh, we're working on issues. today i said this in my speech that we, well, today we are expanding, and in that state, penetration into other markets. e through the union of agreements with other countries of africa, the

middle east and southeast asia, latin america, where we may open new representative offices where a specialist is required, so we will find here the maximum balance in order to uh, keeping your presence somewhere. and somewhere else. thank you. thank you question from a fair russia for the truth gusev dmitry gennadievich get ready for klyakin vladimir dear denis valentinovich, you have been doing a lot of import substitution as a minister and managed to do a lot, but import substitution itself . this is a reactive measure, catching up, where we will try to copy what has been done in the world, what already exists, the work of the deputy prime minister. it is still a strategic work and assumes that you will determine the directions where we should expect a technological breakthrough and the technology of this

breakthrough. you also determined the creation of research institutes, which, together with production, will provide these breakthrough breakthrough ideas, breakthrough technologies. the question is in which industries what products should we expect? on this path on these technologies on this technological breakthrough, in which we will be ahead of the rest in the very next few years. thank you very much for your reply. gennadievich thank you for your question. in general, i tried just the same in my speech to identify those strategic areas where we see both challenges and growth points in order to ensure technological sovereignty

. independence and rights are absolutely that, well, in addition to current duties, as the minister of industry, energy and trade of the russian federation as deputy prime minister, in addition to removing certain sharp corners in coordination, and we must and will definitely deal with authoritative questions about the tasks of development of this bloc and new strategies. uh, the directions on which our independence in the economy as a whole, but also in key industries in particular, will depend. i'm ready to list them again. it's energy security, and everything that goes with it , it's food security. and these

are its constituent elements, just laid down in industry. this is agricultural chemistry, and including mineral fertilizer, this is also transport accessibility, which includes aviation, the automotive industry , transport, engineering, and shipbuilding, without which we will not be able to provide, uh, comfortable logistics for our manufacturers and consumers, so move away from the direction where we see the main accents that we will develop and create new points in the near future growth. thank you, please, faction new people vladimir vladimirovich plyakin prepare for vladimir viktorovich pavlov but people dear denis valentinovich uh, one of the key factors in economic growth and development

industry is the availability of cheap and long-term money, the chairman of the new people party, alexei nechaev, at a meeting of russian president vladimir putin with the leaders of the faction on july 7, further suggested that the state support a program to finance medium-sized enterprises to scale their business and more intensive growth of progressive russian companies. we propose that the government work with the participation of industrial enterprises and launch the new industry program from october 1, 22 in order to provide russian industrialists with tools that are long with a horizon of 10 years and cheap money at a rate of no more than 3%, in order to produce products that are in demand on the market, such a measure must be supported not only those who already produce products, but also attract capital owners who are ready to invest free funds to create new domestic industries. are the government ready to support the development of this program. what is your personal opinion on this proposal? thank you so much. thank you in unison with vladimir vladimirovich

putin, who instructed us at the st. petersburg economic forum to develop a program in the near future, and we will do this before the autumn to support, and industrial enterprises focused on creating products that ensure technological sovereignty, and just based on those approaches and principles, which you just mentioned, i mean, these are available credit resources and a rate of up to 7% per annum was designated, these are preferential tax regimes and fourth. this ensuring demand for the developed and produced.