where are the boundaries of the washington regional committee biden's middle east voyage story from pakistan from love to hate hyperbole in relations how russia and the united states were friends flutter like a butterfly, pity like a bee iranian drones materials of our program. as the international crisis deepens, the main line of tension crystallizes clearly moscow washington as advertised in the era of primitive accumulation let's go take the past 100 years, frenzied maktism, the fifties or the reagan evil empire in the early eighties, the worm dangerous frontier, the sixties or the intervention during the russian

civil war and the isolation of soviet russia in the twenties on the other hand, a safe and instructive resolution of the caribbean crisis, which, by the way , began to unwind exactly 60 years ago in the summer of the sixty-second detente in the seventies. almost fraternizing, in the late eighties, not to mention perhaps the most fruitful moment of cooperation during the presidency of franklin dalan roosevelt, stalin began to establish relations with roosevelt at the very beginning of the thirties, the second stalinist five-year plan was going on in the ussr on behalf of soviet russia , the soviet trading society, amtorg, has been operating in the usa since the twenties, its main task is the export of american technologies and specialists. this requires the favor of the government and the first thing that roosevelt did as soon as he came to power in the thirty-third year recognized the ussr and established

diplomatic relations. to establish them, they used every opportunity, having learned that stalin loves american packards. roosevelt gives him in 1935, a chic armored model on the cards later. the leader will appear domestic forces. no worse, but outwardly similar to this car, although with constructive differences, cultural diplomacy is developing in the thirty-fifth year, ilya elf and evgeny petrov are going to the usa, the result of the trip was very. desirable book of essays one-story america literally 10 years later years, as part of a campaign to combat cringing before the west, it will be removed to a special squadron, the pinnacle of diplomacy is a non-stop flight to the united states via the north pole of two soviet crews on ant-25 chkalov and gromov aircraft, the president receives them personally in the oval office of an event comparable in scale to gagarin's flight roosevelt

zayadlov, the philatelist is presented with a stamp with a portrait of the levanevsky pilot and an overprint of it issued in honor of the first aborted flight to san francisco across the pole. now it is one of the most expensive stamps in the world before the start of the war relations. so strong that washington is ready to connect the union to the land lisa program already in the fortieth year, the accession of the baltic states prevented this step in the white house, they did not understand the contract for the supply of b-25 bombers. they would have been produced in the ussr under license, however, after the entry of both countries into the war, relations returned to their previous level. roosevelt was ready to open a second front. the topic is discussed at a conference in tehran in the forty- third year, it is noteworthy that roosevelt is located not in the american, but in the soviet embassy, ​​then both leaders of stalin roosevelt actively promoted the idea of ​​​​a second front, it is in europe that churchill rests and offers an alternative to landing, or in the balkans

roosevelt declares that if churchill does not agree to land in continental europe , then all american troops will go to the pacific ocean in the summer of 1944, the allies will land in normandy, but there was also a counter promise in yalta, stalin confirmed that the ussr would enter the war with japan 3 months after the end of the war in europe he fulfills his promise on august 8 , the manchurian operation of the red begins. already on september 2, japan was defeated, but roosevelt did not witness these events, as well as the victory over germany; he died on april 12, 1945, the american president was harry trumpet. in the history of russian american relations there is no irreversibility. every crisis is replaced by a thaw. but there is an inevitable cyclicality. the thaw does not

grow into a new quality of cooperation, but generates a new confrontation. last 35 years demonstrates. this is especially evident at the turn of the eighties and nineties, the pendulum swung so far towards sugary harmony that now it has just as sharply gone to the opposite and modest explosiveness. russia has finally made a choice in favor of a civilization of common sense of universal human experience. i am convinced that our people will definitely master this tele way. there is no people in the world who would be harmful. the air of freedom and this rule has no exceptions today . to the american people, to the will of the people of russia, i invite you and your lyceum to the people of the united states to take the path of partnership in the name of freedom and

justice in the 21st century. yes, for those who don’t remember, that time it’s hard to believe that this is not a fashionable deepfake now, but a genuine speech by the president of russia in the us congress 30 years by historical standards not so long ago and we invited our reliable comrade and good friend to talk about the phenomena of russian american relations ivan safranchuk ivan alekseevich has

the talent not to stray from the course in the world chaos, using the science of international relations as a compass. ivan greetings good afternoon, we have been discussing american relations in russia for 15 years. it has always been distinguished by the ability to find the right metaphor. there, sail in different boats in the same direction and so on. ah, metaphors. it changes all the time. so, if you try to sum up some constants, there is no american policy towards russia there for the last 10 or 15 years. here is a longer perspective. probably more longer term, the most uh, constant a constant is what russia is for america - it's something else. that is, it’s definitely not a part of e, of its own, not a part of its own, like, for example, europe became its e, japan well, or other

powers defeated in world war ii, but russia. this is something else. and we probably were not doomed to it. it seems to me that at first it happened, by accident. it’s just that when america entered the world arena, it emerged from the isolation of russia in russia, there was a revolution, yes, and self-isolation. and she came out of self-isolation a very energetic industrial power that uh, came to the capping in the colonial uh, ahead of or and respectively for them. uh, the opening of markets did not go through colonialism, but through the fight against colonialism. and at that time we made a revolution. above themselves, they became completely different strange incomprehensible things for a significant part of the world, and

this somehow coincided. we present two different worldview e, alternatives, but the united states, on the basis of its e exclusivity and its own ideas about exclusivity believes that their task is to lead the whole world to some kind of bright future. and they are trying to bring this world to a brighter future based on their own idea that there should be some kind of common denominator should be universation, well, universalization. naturally american style. we still have at the heart of our idea of ​​ourselves about the world, uh, the concept is close, but completely different, paradoxical as it is uniqueness. we believe that we are not like others, this does not mean that we are better others or we are worse than others. mom says i'm special. yes, yes, we are different and we believe that

others also have uniqueness and, accordingly. our task. this is how it somehow happened to fight with those who want to bring everyone to a common denominator. and now, this is, uh, not something that is not a struggle based on practical interests. this is something ideological, but not ideological in the sense that it was during the cold war, when capitalism was on the one hand on the other. uh, communism is very interesting, because in that case, from this point vision. here's what happened there 30-odd years ago is perceived in a completely different way. in my opinion. we have now reminded our viewers of the famous speech of boris nikolayevich yeltsin in the american congress on exactly 30. back in the summer of 1992, where it was just, well, just the complete opening of the merging of fraternization and stuff in the early nineties, and you are wonderful. do you remember, after all, not only idealism in

relation to the west dominated in the perception of the west. although it was also we looked at the west through rose-colored glasses. but after all, if you look even at the concept of 93 years, the concept of foreign policy in january of the ninety- third year. there, a lot of pragmatism spoke of itself, it was believed that here is communism and all the communist dogma, which was significant for russia for soviet foreign policy. it takes us away from our practical interests, so the idea was to get rid of this dogma and move on to practical yeltsin actually spoke about this, these are speeches. yes, yes, and in that sense, it's not exactly perfect. and in what was the delusion, the delusion was that very good, by the way it is written in the book. yeltsin, uh , in the first person, uh, 1994, there is uh, it seems to me a very important point where it is said that russia wants to return home to its

west. and there even, in my opinion, these are actually quotes. if you want an entente, here is sometime from the entente. uh, so they fell out. well, from this western community. and now we want to return to it. this is remarkable, considering that when we dropped out of the entente, they carried out this intervention here. in general, the second time. this there was an attempt to return somewhere in their history to that fork where, as we thought, we turned the wrong way, it turned out that when we, or there, yeltsin kozyrev went out to his own, they took away their sword and put them on their knees. in general, they were not their own at all. it’s interesting, because it turns out that we are now there 30 years later. eh , we again seem to have come to the conclusion that we didn’t go there and we need to return somewhere to ourselves, because,

again, it’s just to ourselves it's in a different place now. only we behave differently we understand, here we understand ourselves differently, but in the west during this time it also happened. eh, it happened. uh, some transformation of their views. now, if e i said that the first constant is that we are perceived as completely different, who can become their own only if they stop being themselves , so it turned out that our price for entering the west is that we no longer be. in general. in general, i must say that western civilization is generally very bad. e, integrates others into itself, and unlike some others, which it is convenient to attach large pieces and somehow , uh, give them the same rights. like, like yourself, and the most successful examples of integration into the west

that have always been extolled there in japan, germany - this is integration through military defeat through a complete rejection of oneself. we didn't and won't go for it. eh, there is a question. does this mean that we are doomed to an absolutely irreconcilable conflict, or maybe this is normal there? the main thing is that there is no war. ah, before i say it. i wanted to start talking about what happened this transformation over those 30 years ago. here is the perception of ours as others, but for decades in a cold year. e wars, probably from the thirties, we were perceived as a significant other, because it was clear that the country that had done this to itself remained alive, carried out forced industrialization at an incredible cost, then won the war, sent the first man into space, and so on. you can't ignore this, it's

different, but it's really significant, uh, different, a over the past 30 years. uh grew up a generation in the west those who inherited the constant that we are different, but lost the constant that we are significant others. they even have a fight. not so much with us. how much of our importance they want, relatively speaking, to drive us under the plinth. probably if we, uh, remained a significant other for the united states, and our relations would now be different . uh, but now we have to go through this stage where they try not to even fight us. they're trying to turn us into a historic scrap. yes, i say all the time that it is undesirable for us, as it seems to me, to enter the

long stage of being against america, we need to win back world astrakhanism without america, because we lay our fate on fighting this giant, and sometimes rather brainless e giants. it seems to me hmm, we shouldn't , we need to do this to the extent that we need to, so to speak, tear their hands off yes, but just putting fate on the fight against america, the historical fate of russia, i think this is wrong. i think we need to go to the formula relations, that we want to live without america, and not they are against america, and there are many in the world who want the same thing, by the way, now brix is ​​suddenly actively talking about expanding it, in fact . if all these talks are true, who wants

to somehow join, it turns out brix - this is such a twenty without the west, there are two large factions there. this is brix a five and e, west seven. by the way, i would also emphasize that one faction is mainly the faction of the colonialists. but the second faction is those who either were large colonies, or never became a colony, er, but in general i experienced it myself. so let's say anger, uh, colonialists and partly was uh, was under occupation. well, i remembered that after the revolution there were still foreign troops on our territory. e troops, entente. uh, china also surrendered significant territories to foreigners at the end. well, it cannot be said that in its purest form, that this is a fraction of, e, former colonies, after all, china

and russia were not colonies of them, but this is a fraction of those who experienced it. what is colonialism and what is deal with the colonists. here, too, i think, should not be forgotten. this is somewhere in the subcortex of these two factions and brick has become a fairly effective faction in the top twenty. and now e that faction is clearly experiencing problems, and the brix faction, er, is expanding and, in general, if it includes. for all the other members of the twenty, except for the big seven, then, in general, the big seven is no longer needed, just as the big twenty will be the big thirteen. this is also good. and although they are still adding iran there. so there will be more. no, it will. uh. i think, that you can reach 15 plus a good figure. yes , thank you very much. ivan saranchuk was with you. after

the commercial, we will continue to discuss american politics. now in the context of the middle east, don't walk away.

president biden made a trip to the middle east israel palestinian territories communication with the leaders of the arab states of the persian gulf the visit is not for show, there have been a lot of problems in relations with the region, which has always played a special role, but in the context of the global security crisis, it sharply adds value in israel regular political upheavals, parliamentary elections are coming again, the fourth for 2.5 years , interim prime minister yair, lapid, another interlocutor, benyamin, netanyahu, the former head of the cabinet, who intends to become the future italian, has frankly sympathized with trump. so in a conversation of warmth, there is not much more important meeting with the leadership of saudi arabia. more precisely, with the actual ruler of the country, crown prince mohammed salman. crown prince

of saudi arabia mohammed bin salman self-motivated ambitious and charismatic member of the new generation of royalty, he was born in 1985 to the third wife of his father the current king of saudi arabia studied in his homeland and received a bachelor's degree in law career began in 2009 when he was appointed special adviser to his father then governor eriyat provinces after the ascension of parents to the throne in 2015. mohammed became minister of defense and chaired the economic and development council, the main body of economic planning. the experts believe that it was he who made the decision to participate in the civil war and was the initiator of the break in diplomatic relations with the boat in april 2016 mohammed was salman outlined the program of economic modernization, the introduction of 2030, in

fact. these are plans for economic reforms, the purpose of which is to diversify the country's economy and reduce its dependence on oil, according to the crown prince of saudi arabia has three sources of strength that are beyond competition, first, it is islam. there are two main shrines for muslims mosques in mecca and medina. muslims make the hajj pilgrimage to mecca is the main event in the life of every muslim, secondly, saudi arabia has huge investment opportunities and finally. thirdly, its unique geographical position, the prince also explained that the kingdom acts as a conduit for a real moderate islam incompatible with what iran's al-qaeda and the islamic state group offer. biden publicly and more than once declared ben salman an outcast, with whom decent

people cannot communicate. the reason for the murder saudi opposition publicist, in whose organization the american intelligence services. they definitely blamed the crown prince. the saudi dissident jamal khashoggi was the nephew of the famous saudi billionaire one nahashoki. he studied in the united states, graduated from indiana university, was engaged in journalism, and in 2007 became the editor-in-chief of the saudi newspaper alvator, however, he was soon removed from this post and excommunicated journalism for criticizing the authorities and personally crown prince mohammed ben salman in 2017. jamal khashoggi emigrated to the united states and became a columnist newspapers in the washington post, he continued to criticize the domestic and foreign policy of the kingdom on october 2 , 2018, entered the building of the consulate of saudi arabia in istanbul to file a divorce

and did not leave from there then the saudi arabian authorities said that the khashoggi left the building of the consulate, through another exit in the case. turkish police intervened for 20 days. later, the media reported that the dismembered body was found in a well in the garden of the residence of the consul of saudi arabia, five hundred meters from the consulate itself. then there appeared us intelligence report, in which the blame for the murder was placed personally on the crown prince of the kingdom, mohammed bin salman. it was reported that the liquidation team that arrived in istanbul was led by saut al-qaktani, who personally reported to the crown prince, and the current president biden himself during the election campaign said that he would treat saudi arabia as a pariah on february 26 this year, the us state department released a new statement from the secretary of state , brinkin about responsibility for the murder of khashog, as well as

previous state department documents. it talked about the imposition of sanctions by the biden administration on 76 subjects of the kingdom, but the name of the crowns of the prince did not appear in the text. it didn’t work out to stay at the height of moral principles. saudi arabia is very necessary, as a key player in the oil market, the majority in the democratic party stigmatizes biden for conciliation, and the white house protocol broke his head how to arrange everything so that the president does not shake hands with ben salmanov. wald artist , hangdelsman, this is how he imagines the visit of badins to saudi arabia is an ultra-liberal view of events, on the right is crown prince mohammed ben salman, on the left is obviously biden and the adviser says sir - this is oil. harry warrell with the conservative version of america is again on his knees before opek. well listen

man. says a man who looks like a biden. i need your oil because i'm shutting down my oil pipelines. in that steglich with an illustration of biden's actions, there is a clear reference to pearl harbor and the beginning of world war ii. american energy is written on the ships, and emblems on the plane the democratic party of the usa is a classic of the genre from michael ramirez immediately clear. who is to blame for everything , the headline reads, we turn energy into weapons, our hoses, of course, it is written russia at the reception of prince ben salman, a drawing of chips. first in line is phil mickelson, a golfer who has spoken rude things about the saudi golf league and has already apologized. number two is a maidan-like man holding a canister marked with gasoline. we will discuss the features of the biden trip with

an excellent specialist in the regions nikolai surkov the leading new employee of the imo of the russian academy of sciences on the track nikolai, if you try to somehow summarize biden's visit to the region, what did he want there? why did he come biden he came first of all so that a thaw would come in his relations. e with strange regions, because almost all e are in this region. and frankly, it was frightening that america wants to reduce its primarily military presence there, of course, it is too early to talk about a complete withdrawal. it would probably be a dream for someone. well, it's not like that, the base remains military remains. just not on the scale that we observed 10-15 years ago, so we need to demonstrate that america remains an important player in the region, that it is ready to defend its allies. from whom everyone is only worried about problems. early three aspects. this is a nuclear program.

these are ballistic missiles and attack drones. and what is most important, in fact, is iran's regional policy as a whole, because they all believe that iran is pursuing a policy of expansion and are trying to resist it.

our relationship has a long contented history in 1926, our country, the soviet union, was then the first state to recognize an established kingdom. now we are very pleased to receive you here to increase khakimov in a short time

to achieve the confidence of recognition from the arabs. after a few years of his work, especially the population loves soviet russia and there were no better friends. we hope that we are worthy successors. here are the deeds of that great generation of our diplomats. the head of state pays great attention to our work, the foundation laid, as it is, of course, works. but after all, the regional ally really liked trump precisely because he declared iran, which means that the main danger was tearing up the treaty , and so on, the biden, it seems, wants the opposite, how it is linked. here with relations with the gulf, and biden is really trying to sit on two chairs. this is a very true observation, because on the one hand he

wants to reassure the arabs on the other hand. he is trying to maintain a certain course for the restoration of the coincidence, how can he succeed in this incomprehensibly? and, because the only thing he makes a bet oh, this was already sounded in his speech at the time of arrival in israel that we will provide you with qualitative superiority. we will help you create a regional missile defense system. we will help you create a regional system against air defense with you, israel is an important point. and i think, that's exactly what he wants to rely on, here, getting back to the topic, but we know. the formal reason due to which relations cooled very much during the biden. this is the murder of an oppositionist, but besides this, after all, we are used to a decade before, to the fact that saudi arabia's relationship with the united states is based on a powerful foundation of very, as it were, specific interests. and now it seems that these

interests, on the one hand, have not gone anywhere, on the other hand. they don't work like protecting good relationships. why what has changed they work? actually? hmm, there is no need to try to exaggerate the frictions that they are, they are really annoying, and there is a whole range of problems. in fact, there is even a personal fact, on really. here is uh the relationship between the leaders. well , in the middle east, this is always important. for example, vladimir putin uses this very well. yes, he had excellent relations with erdogan, they had excellent relations with them, they are well treated by mu salman e. what is not in relations between the united states and saudi arabia, for example, but the matter is different. and if you look, and in an interview given by mohammed bin salman, he directly said that america is a strategic ally, he does not call any other country that. well, except for immediate neighbors, but america is a strategic ally. mohammed bin salman said that 90%, uh, is a bilateral agenda.

it is not problematic, that is, there are 10%, but what are these 10%, the devil in detail 10% is interference in the internal affairs of saudi arabia. that is, this is criticism of the issue of minority women there. this is uh, as the saudis believe, and the propaganda campaign that is being waged against them in the united states is actually theirs. this is very annoying to the americans. here to fill that vacuum which may appear in the middle east, they need some kind of regional alliance, similar to nato, but in the middle east context, and cooperation between arabs and israel is needed to recreate, but cooperation between arabs and israel is impossible. here, on the required scale, without at least some compromise on the ballistic issue. that's why biden goes, he e -comes to palestine. he meets with palestinians. he resumes assistance. that is, it shows that the peace process is ongoing. and it gives formally. e possibility

the same saudi arabia to say that yes, israel is a completely handshake partner. we can cooperate with him, but there is another very important meeting in the region, next week in tehran. there is a so-called stalinist format putin and erdogan are going to the president of iran and syria clearly in the spotlight. we asked now less began to hear it is clear that the world 's attention. it means that it has gone a little bit to other places, but nevertheless, firstly, what is happening there. secondly, does it work, does this work? rather unique interaction that took place in the triangle a couple of years ago, in general the situation is relatively stable, another thing, which is still very strong, is the impact of the economic crisis. there is a crisis, a purely climatically terrible drought. few people talk about dust storms, but the population suffers terribly from all this. i mean, uh. well, the main thing is external

forces. everyone is practically interested in maintaining the status quo; no one wants a new big war, and the syrians themselves are tired of this. and they are all now forces are spent on finding gas for cooking on finding money for fuel for bread. and here are the elementary things turkish promises. now we're going to do the operation. it 's a bluff or really something. maybe, i think there might be some very limited operation, because erdogan has already talked about it a lot. well, do absolutely nothing. he can not, especially since there was there a very important moment, but there were indeed. still, kurdish militants killed turkish soldiers for turkish public opinion - this is unacceptable, and the attitude towards their own servicemen is very reverent there, so somehow it is necessary to punish, but nevertheless, astana is needed. what for? uh. here, where the operation can take place at all, the interests of not even russia and turkey, but rather turkey and iran, may clash, and all this must be

discussed so that there is no new big crisis. this is the last question, probably very important for us. here's to me i'm not very much at all here middle eastern colleagues, well, after all are brought, and i hear quite often in recent months, when all the events in eastern europe are taking place, fears that russia, fully concentrating on solving problems in ukraine , so to speak, will reduce its presence in the middle east, in particular. here in syria specifically and it scares a lot of people, because as you can see, it's fair that they are satisfied with the status squa not afraid of changes that will be unmanageable, is this really a problem or are they exaggerating, well, uh, it's hard to hide that russia indeed, he is directing his main resources to ukraine now. but judging by what we see, uh, the russian military presence will remain there,

because syria is not only syria, but, uh, let's say, a kind of hotbed of fight against isis. yes. russia is also interested in syria in a global context, because there is no presence. it is simply a presence in the eastern mediterranean. this is the base that is needed in order to be able to control the approaches. let's say to the black sea straits. understandable thanks. nikolai surkov was with you. as we already discussed a topic that worries all of biden's interlocutors in the middle east iran negotiations on the resumption of the so-called nuclear deal froze at a point after which arab monarchies can stop completely for israel. this would be good news. they have always been against an agreement with tehran, they believed that they would become a cover for the continuation of the nuclear weapons program. so the decision of donald trump to bury the deal 4 years ago caused a stir among

american allies in the region. applause biden. he promised to return to the agreement. however, here is the case when the exit is much easier than the return entry. iran is active in regional world politics on tuesday, a meeting of the astana meeting will be held in the iranian capital. the presidents of turkey and russia come to the summit of the ibrahimuraisi format. significant events have accumulated tension around syria, but there are also ukrainian issues in bilateral negotiations. putin and erdogan may not be a milestone for tehran-43, of course, but still, iran officially announced a couple of weeks ago desire to join the brix, which is increasingly moving towards the twenty without the west and at the september sco summit in samarkand, iran will join this organization. it is turning into the most powerful structure in eurasia at least in terms of the representation of the most important powers, significant shifts were stimulated by a special military operation

this week, another piece of news related to iran was fired by us national security adviser jake sullivan and, at his suggestion, all the leading american media sounded the alarm. russia buys. iran has a large batch of military drones. and all at once to the ukrainian front. our answer to bayrakts. so to say, whether or not to believe the insinuations of the adversary is a matter of taste, but the created excitement drew attention to an interesting phenomenon. where did the country, which for more than 40 years under punitive sanctions and constant supervision , have such advanced technologies, for details, we turned to specialist yuri lyamin, his colleagues at the center for analysis of strategy and technology recently published a book persian bastion yuri current, from where iran has such wealth, iran began to develop drones during the iran-iraq war. eh, it gradually became more and more

a priority for him, with the condition that it was precisely because of the sanctions that he made it more and more difficult to acquire a modern one. that is. well, we pilot large combat aircraft, helicopters and so on, but a drone that is smaller in size. it was easier for him to do. e, serious, therefore, to say that there was help in this that intelligence for the territory of iran was very active, the united states was conducting yes, some others. weird, as with the help of their drones many of these drones would have been shot down or fallen on the territory of iran and captured, and, accordingly, their technology. they studied it and implemented it one way or another. mq9 ripper or reaper is a symbol of death, an american shock modular drone equipped with a turboprop engine, its speed is more than 400 km / h, and the ceiling is 13 km. this is a rather large

terrorist thunderstorm drone from which the leaders of al-qaeda and the islamic state were destroyed more than once in january 2020 using this weapon. was killed general of the iranian islamic revolutionary guard corps as cashier soleimani. however, two years earlier in 2018, the iranians stated that they had several captured american drones and among them mq-9. reaper, officially none of them fell in iran, but several were lost in syria and yemen. the commander of the aerospace forces of the islamic revolutionary guard corps, general mir ali hadji , did not specify under what circumstances the drone ended up with the iranian military. well said they would serve as models to create iranian prototypes later in 2020 iranians. they even boasted that they could take control of american drones. as

evidence, two video recordings from the camera of american reapers were presented on the frames, the accident of one of them is shown, the first video is from a drone that is in distress, and the second is from another machine that destroys a faulty drone nonetheless in february last year. iran demonstrated its new command drone, 22 it turned out to be very similar to the american mq9 reaper, but smaller in size. size, according to the iranian military , the performance characteristics are not inferior to the american prototype of teams 22 can be in the air for a whole day, the mass of the combat load is up to 300 kg, for comparison, the combat load of the reaper is one and a half tons, but other performance characteristics are american. the throne and its iranian counterpart got really close technologies, so to speak, to look at. at night, then it is necessary to produce elements, components, chips,

where they come from. iran has concentrated its military industry. she can't provide. well the whole the circle of uh weapons, a technician of some sort, has simply been too long in an economy that is well under the heavy yoke of sanctions, therefore priority areas have been identified. this is the rocket program. this is just a program for the development of unmanned vehicles and other things, which is trying to ensure maximum import substitution on the other hand. if it is not possible at the moment to make a copy of some part or something, they all try to get these parts from abroad in these ways. that is, if we talk about iranian the military-industrial complex as a whole, to what extent, under the conditions of sanctions, they are able to solve the tasks that they set for themselves . well, as i said, they focus on key areas. well, basically they have. in general, it is very large and probably occupies a very significant sector of the economy. that

is, in general, where exactly they are trying to create a complete industrial cycle, that is, if possible, production there, and there the most basic materials up to the correspondingly finished products, the results are very large, of course, they don’t enough. they have a problem with the creation there, for example, modern, again, such aircraft there are helicopters. and you, for the reason that, well, it is known that the self-consciousness of modern aviation engines there, which are large and powerful , is a very sphere in which there are literally single countries. in general, they can say to do something, and iran here, of course, is difficult to compete with the capabilities of the united states, china, russia, just if we talk about the region, what is happening there in these technical areas, the same iran is extremely active throughout the spectrum well, others too, if there is an arms race, and what can russia count on under the new conditions. the richest countries in the region - they still buy it, mostly american western weapons. these are the arab monarchies. we tried to

break into this market last. well, all the last years, but i think that now in the conditions of the current sanctions pressure. it will be very difficult for us right now. well, even to keep those small positions that are there, that is. is of course strange how we had and there is, for example, if he, of course, after all, you are no longer quite the middle east north africa well, he is our major buyer of weapons of military equipment and all appearances will remain so. that is, he will, and other countries. they are more pressed under pressure from the united states, and even more so, now the european union has come to this plan of origin. and in this regard, it will be, well, much harder for us. with respect to, well, there, probably, most of the arab countries, that is, it is now clear that, for example, the same iran if it is just for him the pressure is already there. well, he himself is under the

strongest sanctions pressure, he doesn’t care here. what could be a threat. well, this is obvious, but there is another phenomenon, some traditional partners and clients of the united states there, turkey, the emirates of saudi arabia are now demonstrating to washington that no one is cooperating with them, with whom they want such a purely political positioning. this may give some additional opportunities for russia now, right now , most likely, they are just trying not to pour out the united states that's the thing. that is, there, perhaps when the situation is somewhat, well, it will be discharged or it will drag on there, so, as it were, it will be perceived more calmly there, perhaps this, that is , expansion will begin again, that is, precisely military technical cooperation. but i think that right now, right now, they will try, how to say, don’t mess around, that is, with all the contradictions that they have, the united states and for the united states now, well, the purchase of weapons from this from russia is like ? basically like red

a rag has an effect on the bull, and they can't really press very hard there. uh, they have very strong pressure elements, that is, countries, for example, like egypt, they get there, well, large-scale american military assistance. e, s. again, all these countries, they are major buyers of american weapons, depend on the supply of american spare parts for ammunition and the like in general in this, they, of course, will try not to lose contact with russia, that is, uh, they do not want to completely depend on the united states again, then have they will try these save, but he says, at the moment, most likely they will not take such measures that will be very angry usa thank you the political diversity of the world is now more and more clearly showing the former relations. even very strong ones become thinner, new ones appear. and sometimes. they are well-forgotten old ones on a new historical rifle, a report from pakistan by our permanent author asim alima.

hayat abad is a well-known shopping area of ​​peshevar. this market used to be famous for russian goods. and now it's only here chinese products in the past during the years of the soviet-afghan war. russian goods. came across here in a smuggled way from afghanistan a. then they dispersed throughout pakistan. now everything has changed in the past. in this market there were many goods of the soviet union, and they were in great demand. along with the american ones, but now there is none of this left because the border is closed. business relations between russia and pakistan were not strong before. built in in 1985, with the participation of soviet specialists, however, due to poor management and the lack of proper maintenance, this gigantic expensive facility was closed by thousands of its employees. lost their jobs is another area

of ​​cooperation military-technical pakistan this russia, some types of weapons and military equipment , mi-17 mi-35 helicopters and various types of tanks. daimur. khan from the institute of pakistan deals with relations with russia, he says that if it were not for the americans, it would be possible to cooperate more. many opportunities for trading. especially in the energy sector. pakistan has big needs in the gas sector oil gases can benefit both countries the important issue is the price and i think that russia could support pakistan's recent visit to russia by the now former prime minister of the country. he put on a lot of noise, including in the us they say that the government was overthrown due to the fact that he visited moscow and the americans were very unhappy with this. now imran khan says he discussed the possibilities imports from russia cheap oil and wheat, and the current government. against this, the americans

were outraged by my visit. in russia, they said that imran should not have gone. the americans told their people in parliament that if imran khan remained in power, pakistan would face difficult days. pakistan has a formal agreement with russia on gas supplies, but due to sanctions, it cannot be implemented now negotiations are underway to buy russian oil pakistan can export leather and textiles to russia, but import wheat trade. maybe reach billions of dollars. russia supplies us with cheap goods. such as gasoline and gas, then we must take them. we must have business relations with all countries. we will do business not only with israel, but with everyone else. the katana of russian dermantics and experts say that they welcome the development of relations with russia, especially if it trades cheap goods with pakistan, and their

quality is higher than chinese ones. in the new world, partnerships are scattered inappropriately, more that the experience was considered marginal. suddenly , we have already mentioned about iran, but without creating an independent economy, managed by its own national personnel, relying on domestic natural resources. own technologies. it is impossible to overcome the economic pressure from the imperialists and further it is impossible to maintain political sovereignty. economic independence is the basis of political independence at the root. the great leader kim irsen matured and into the future the other day, the korean people's political republic, just recognized the dpr and the lc. the country , to put it mildly, is closed to world politics, participates

only so much, since the latter affects the survival of north korea. and here pyongyang will take a position with the right people. thread, this was an international review, goodbye. how was the nosification of ukraine? why did the poisonous flower of nazism bloom in this country after 80 years as one of the reasons? why did it happen this different level of education rewrote the history of the second the world corroded the russian language, i do not want to speak ukrainian. why are you forcing me? i studied at a russian school in mariupol why do they send me to a russian school? they say that you taught everything poorly, taught in ukrainian, the cultural basis of nosification is the total adipation of the population,

we don’t know how the identification of ukraine will take place, but the fact that we need this is beyond doubt. summer will be interesting, right?

summer will not be boring movies series documentaries cartoons no, nothing impossible.

manufacturers of good things want and most importantly, but it's best to check. we are all sick of football, valya football at the stadium, meet the new season, the support card of the fan on gosuslugi.ru. i invite you, dear friends, to

our new edition of the besogon tv author's program, which will be called somewhat frivolously, are you a hunter or i hope you understand? why is it called that? looking forward to seeing you?

we start a message from the national center of defense control of the russian federation , the armed forces of ukraine continue to fire bombard residential areas. slavyansk according to colonel general. mikhail mizintsev on the eve of the artillery attacked the central