the theme worked fine. here, mr. yushchenko was tymoshenko. they were absolutely pro-western oriented. the same so-called civilizational choice. what is there? sorry for bad manners. nafig civilizational choice money stole from the ukrainian people hid in banks and want to protect them. that's the best way to protect yourself by saying that these are civilizational elections that they began to pursue an anti-russian policy in the hope that they would not make them. uh, the money will be protected there. well, that's how it goes of course what they do. they get away with everything. this is the whole point of this civilizational choice. i 'll call you right now, shoigul, where last year he reported to putin about the provocation of the british destroyer. in the black sea. the west, together with ukraine, are rattling their weapons very close to the russian border at a distance of 20 km from our state border. or that is, strategic bombers, and not, as you know, carry very serious unplanned weapons. here

i want to emphasize this unplanned teaching in in the black sea, respectively, the impression that we are not allowed to relax. well, let him know that we are not relaxing, sergeyevich, it is necessary to raise the question of seeking to provide russia with a serious long-term guarantee of ensuring our security in this direction, because it’s just to exist and constantly think that russia can happen there tomorrow can't, but if everyone wants peace, tranquility in well-being trust is the key here of the bad. someone can not place shock systems near our borders reply? and what is wrong here, please, we will create conditions for increasing trust and security. well, what's wrong with not one of these points, not just no position or even no answer or yes, the impression that we didn't even put these questions to them. just bypassed we see there are political clichés and proposals on some minor issue. putin repeatedly

emphasizes the further expansion of nato is not acceptable, what do you think, the west does not understand about russia, we sometimes seem to live in a different world. here i just told you the obvious things. well, how can you not understand this, they said we will not expand and expand, on the contrary. it was necessary to treat russia as a possible ally, strengthen no, everything, on the contrary, an attempt to further collapse in 1991. we divided ourselves into 12, in my opinion, parts. yes , well, the impression is that, e, a partner of this is not much too big russia in their opinion today. it seems to me that only this can explain such constant pressure and so year after year and every time we snapped at something hinder something of concern expressed. you go with your concerns , we will do what we think is necessary one two three, four five five, out, expanded. so why does she

not understand us? i think everything is clear. we want to ensure our security ukraine will be given the eyebrows in recent months. western weapons are coming to ukraine simply in a continuous stream, defiantly in front of the eyes of the forces of peace, the united states and nato have embarked on the unsteady development of the territory of ukraine as a theater of potential war of actions that is now is happening, and the tension that develops in europe is their fault. at every step. russia was forced to somehow respond at every step, the situation was constantly deteriorating, deteriorating, deteriorating, and degraded to graded. here. today we are in a situation where we have to decide something. well, it's not clear, is it? it should be clear there. the thing is, we have nowhere to go. they pinned us to such a line. sorry for my then what's next for us. there is nowhere to move, but where do we move now? just they have brought us to such a state that we must tell them, stop from the side. nato says

that such an entry in the coming years is simply unrealistic, which means saying, well, you and i must understand what they say in interstate relations. we are already 30 years old. they say that there will be no nato expansion at all. and today we see the infrastructure of nato right at our house. moreover, ukraine's accession issues are being discussed , they say, as you said, it won't be tomorrow. and when the day after tomorrow and what does it change for us in historical perspective exactly? we hear nothing that ukraine is not ready today to join nato, we know it's you, but they will accept it when it is prepared for this, but for us it may be too late to arm and push extremists from a neighboring state against russia, including including certain regions of the russian federation, well, let’s say they are crimea what do they think we do not see these threats or think that we will limply look at the threats created for russia, and in the

doctrinal documents of ukraine it is written that a russia is an adversary and b is possible the return of the crimea by military means. imagine that ukraine is a member of nato, which means there will be a military confrontation between russia and there is what to fight nato well, i want to ask you, there is the second part of this question, do you want to fight with russia? ask your readers viewers of users of internet resources. you want to want france to fight with russia but that's the way it will be. there will be no winners. and you will find yourself drawn into this conflict against your will. you won't even have time to blink an eye. after that emergency meeting with putin in february, macron, it turns out, invited a documentary filmmaker from the film crew to capture his telephone conversations with the russian leader.

happens and uh did not say that uh cutting is ready for any specific steps that he has prepared? uh, some bill on the agreement of several agreements about appeared on the seventeenth of february - this is the president's said. and that in the minsk agreements i quote the representation so that we were initially losing positions dear colleague mr. everest, in fact believes that this is the same thing, that ukraine should

return to nuclear status and turn on the two functions of coffee and then quote so that they are fulfilled, that such a situation was once again discussed yesterday, as i already said with a french colleague, made public to france itself, fragments of secret negotiations were only emphasized by europe, which signed the minsk agreements, in fact encouraged kiev not to comply with them. calls representatives of donbass separatists.

so, i'm already telling you, when we met in person, we even point out nine 11 12 minsk authorities, modulica. a bloody coup with murderers, arsons from

burning people alive. so zelensky is in this command, which means dialogue implies taking into account the interests of the other side. yes, they submitted their offer. but these separatists somehow call them. they answered the same answer. yes, no, no, where is the dialogue of the metastalks of a fun situation, the ducks have finished eating me, it smells like such a hut. i'm telling you that these so -called separatists have responded to these proposals. they answered, but they don't respond to them, they don't want to talk directly with representatives of donbass. well, it 's written there to directly discuss and agree with

them. but how else then it is impossible to work, therefore, you need to muster up the courage to admit that it is written not to speak in white black to black and white and it works like it or not like it, be patient, my beauty. it is necessary to perform in a different way, but it was just like that kiev does nothing, and from it does not require anything. but they demand everything from russia, but when we ask our partners, including in the norman format, what exactly does russia not fulfill at the place of the agreement and what, in your opinion, under the minsk agreements? would russia have to answer no? we cannot articulate. i am not kidding. that's exactly the dialogue. and what exactly does the lnr not do? there is no dpr under the minsk agreements either, they can’t formulate it, but nevertheless publicly all the time demands execution from us.

meet your colleagues from the united states from europe with such, moreover, you know we have a good attitude of personality, and we still propose to move places first to work to prepare, and then the female, fucking, about the meeting, because otherwise, if you just come to talk about nothing, then this will mean that we have again been sent away.

we had agreed language. but it seems to me that now we need to forgive our assistant, so that they call right now and these wordings are agreed on the whole, of course, i agree with the absolutely correct direction. uh, talking to you, but before the team,

respectively, employees will proceed with a critical exercise. the shelling of the donbass was already seriously growing about the minsk agreements. no one except russia spoke anymore 8 years endlessly long 8 years. we did our best to resolve the situation by peaceful political means. all in vain with the osmian agreements. now, the implementation of which russia insisted on for exactly 7 years, the minsk agreements were killed long before yesterday’s recognition of the people’s republics of donbass yes, of course, now the minsk agreements don’t exist. russia called for peace for 8 years, but

it couldn’t continue like this. we had no other way out. we had to end the eight-year war, so the tasks set by the supreme commander will be completed in full. dnr lnr. nothing will threaten denazification and militarization of ukraine will be carried out, we must be sure that there will be no threats to our country. paul what's in store for us next week? it will be very, very saturated armored territory, armored, armored next week, apparently, will become the territory in iran in tehran to meet the president of russia, turkey and iran to discuss the syrian settlement, but bilateral meetings of leaders will also be held separately. this special political dimension is obvious, that there are a lot of acute

and extremely important issues for discussion. thanks next week. putin has a lot of internal events and the president will hold a meeting of the council on strategic development and national projects. it is clear that the programs require adjustments to the new conditions in the economy in the world, but the main task, unchanged with the help of our projects, was actually solved the most sensitive problems of people, in addition to this, in the schedule of the president, participation in the forum of the agency of strategic initiative ideas for the new time and also will communicate with the participants of the all-russian competition big break, and such teleconferences are always distinguished by surprises. bravo a small announcement for the audience a couple of times we will not be on the air. do not lose. but, and vladimir does not concern you. you are always on duty. yes, i'm always on duty. thanks pavel

summer will be interesting. you ask, you ask, the summer will be exciting, the summer will be an exciting prayer. you know? come on how did you know that the paint was on shot. in the summer there will be an informative premiere like no other in the world. the series will not be boring in the summer.

ah, realizing the colossal amount of difficulties that we face, we will intensively and competently look for hands, certainly no one will